Effect of capsular tension ring on optical and multifunctional lens position outcomes: a systematic review and a Meta-analysis
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Abstract AIM: To evaluate the effect of capsular tension rings with multifunctional lens position and optical outcomes.METHODS: We defined multifunctional lens more than improve vision, but also restore visual quality. Search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library. Scopus for English-language articles published up to November 11, 2020. Randomized controlled trials and comparative prospective clinical trials were selected. Data extraction was completed by independent pairs of reviewers. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool for RCTs and select items from the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for comparative prospective clinical trials.RESULTS: a total of 5 randomized controlled trials and 6 prospective comparative clinical trials were included. Evaluating 1099 eyes of implantation intraocular lens. Capsular tension ring was helpful associated in un-corrected distance visual acuity (SMD: 0.54, 95%CI=0.15 to 0.94, P=0.829) in 1st month. Contrary to 1st month, no show positive effect in 3rd month un-corrected distance visual acuity (SMD: -0.30, 95%CI=-0.70 to -0.10, P=0.311), corrected distance visual acuity (SMD: 0.02, 95%CI=-0.78 to 0.81, P<0.001), sphere (SMD: 0.44, 95%CI=-0.43 to 1.31, P<0.001), cylinder (SMD: -0.12, 95%CI=-0.36 to 0.13, P=0.262), and spherical equivalent (SMD: 0.41, 95%CI=0.13 to 0.69, P=0.084). Our study also revealed low correlation between capsular tension ring and postoperative optical outcome with un-corrected distance visual acuity (SMD: 0.43, 95%CI=-0.69 to 1.56, P=0.001), corrected distance visual acuity (SMD: -0.11, 95%CI=-0.43 to 0.20, P=0.56), sphere (SMD: -0.26, 95%CI=-1.18 to 0.66, P=0.005), cylinder (SMD: 0.10, 95%CI=-0.39 to 0.59, P=0.075), spherical equivalent (SMD: 0.22, 95%CI=-0.10 to 0.54, P=0.849) in 6th month. The position of intraocular lens co-implantation with capsular tension ring was no significantly difference in 1st week with lens de-centration (SMD: -0.34, 95%CI=-1.19 to 0.51, P=0.038) and tilt (SMD: -1.00, 95%CI=-2.19 to 0.19, P=0.007), but capsular tension ring is helpful to prevent lens tilt in 1st month (SMD: -0.67, 95%CI=-1.08 to 0.27, P=0.323). In 3rd month, no significant difference between two groups in lens rotation (SMD: -0.51, 95%CI=-1.71 to 0.69, P<0.001).CONCLUSION: The correlation is low between capsular tension ring and postoperative optical outcomes and lens position, based on small numbers of studies in a short range of follow-up.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00