Cortical inhibitory potentiation reverses maladaptive amygdala plasticity after noise-induced hearing loss

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Summary Across sensory modalities, peripheral deafferentation can induce maladaptive central plasticity that amplifies sensory responses while distorting affective processing, rendering innocuous stimuli unpleasant, intrusive, or even painful. Here, we examined the affective dimension of compensatory plasticity in a mouse model of hyperacusis by introducing noise-induced focal cochlear lesions and tracking maladaptive plasticity in the lateral amygdala (LA), a key limbic hub for sensory-affective valuation. Whereas control mice habituated to neutral sounds, mice with noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) showed sustained LA hyperresponsivity and abnormally strong temporal coupling between calcium transients and pupil dilations, an autonomic index of arousal. NIHL also disrupted discriminative auditory threat learning, producing poorly selective, non-extinguishing enhancement of LA responses and freezing to both threatening and non-threatening sounds. We posited that potentiating inhibition in the higher-order auditory cortex (HO-AC), a prominent source of auditory sensory input to the LA, could reinstate normal affective sound processing after NIHL. Brief bouts of 40-Hz optogenetic activation of HO-AC parvalbumin-expressing inhibitory neurons (PVNs) durably reversed LA sensitization, normalized pupil-indexed arousal dynamics, and reinstated discriminative auditory threat memory. These findings identify cortical inhibitory potentiation as a strategy for reversing neural, autonomic, and behavioral signatures of distorted affective sound processing after peripheral sensory injury.
Full text 1,678 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Summary Across sensory modalities, peripheral deafferentation can induce maladaptive central plasticity that amplifies sensory responses while distorting affective processing, rendering innocuous stimuli unpleasant, intrusive, or even painful. Here, we examined the affective dimension of compensatory plasticity in a mouse model of hyperacusis by introducing noise-induced focal cochlear lesions and tracking maladaptive plasticity in the lateral amygdala (LA), a key limbic hub for sensory-affective valuation. Whereas control mice habituated to neutral sounds, mice with noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) showed sustained LA hyperresponsivity and abnormally strong temporal coupling between calcium transients and pupil dilations, an autonomic index of arousal. NIHL also disrupted discriminative auditory threat learning, producing poorly selective, non-extinguishing enhancement of LA responses and freezing to both threatening and non-threatening sounds. We posited that potentiating inhibition in the higher-order auditory cortex (HO-AC), a prominent source of auditory sensory input to the LA, could reinstate normal affective sound processing after NIHL. Brief bouts of 40-Hz optogenetic activation of HO-AC parvalbumin-expressing inhibitory neurons (PVNs) durably reversed LA sensitization, normalized pupil-indexed arousal dynamics, and reinstated discriminative auditory threat memory. These findings identify cortical inhibitory potentiation as a strategy for reversing neural, autonomic, and behavioral signatures of distorted affective sound processing after peripheral sensory injury. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00