A Second Photoactivatable State of the Anion-conducting channelrhodopsin GtACR1 empowers persistent activity | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article A Second Photoactivatable State of the Anion-conducting channelrhodopsin GtACR1 empowers persistent activity Carsten Kötting, Kristin Labudda, Mohamad Norahan, Lisa-Marie Hübner, and 4 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5677201/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Optogenetics is a method to regulate cells using light. It is applied to study neurons and to develop diagnostic and therapeutic tools for neuron-related diseases. The cation-conducting channelrhodopsin ChR2 triggers photoinduced depolarization of neuronal cells but generates very low ion currents due to the syn -pathway of its branched photocycle. In contrast, the homologous anion-conducting ACR1 from Guillardia theta ( Gt ACR1), exhibits high photocurrents. Here, we investigate the mechanistic cause for the observed high photocurrents in Gt ACR1 using FTIR spectroscopy. Unexpectedly, we discovered that the O intermediate of Gt ACR1 is photoactivable, allowing for fast and efficient channel reopening. Our vibrational spectra show a photocyclic reaction sequence after O excitation similar to the ground state photocycle but with slightly altered channel conformation and protonation states. Our results provide deeper insights into the gating mechanism of channelrhodopsins and pave the way to advance the development of optimized optogenetic tools in future. Biological sciences/Biophysics/Molecular biophysics Biological sciences/Biological techniques/Optical spectroscopy/Infrared spectroscopy Biological sciences/Biological techniques/Optogenetics Biological sciences/Biophysics/Membrane biophysics Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Introduction The identification and characterization of natural channelrhodopsins, such as the cation-translocating channelrhodopsin 2 ( Cr ChR2) found in the chlorophyte Chlamydomonas reinhardtii , marked a milestone for optogenetics 1 – 6 a research field that utilizes genetically modified eukaryotic cells to elicit physiological effects triggered by visible or ultraviolet light 7 – 9 . Ectopically expressed Cr ChR2 can control action potential firing with high temporal and spatial resolution in mammalian neurons 10 , 11 . Recent advances highlight the vast potential of optogenetics for various medical applications, including the treatment of blindness and Parkinson’s disease 7 , 12 – 14 . Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying channelrhodopsins is crucial for improving these proteins as optogenetic tools through rational design. In parallel, researchers are seeking agents with naturally higher photochemical efficiency and improved properties. For instance, anionconducting channelrhodopsins (ACRs), which belong to the same superfamily as cation-conducting channelrhodopsins namely, microbial rhodopsins but differ in their ion selectivity 15 ,16 . Among the anionconducting channelrhodopsins, anion channelrhodopsin-1 ( Gt ACR1) from the cryptophyte Guillardia theta , is so far the best characterized ACR in terms of its gating mechanism and photochemical reaction cycle 1 7–19 . The use of heterologously expressed Gt ACRs 2 0,21 has facilitated the application of optogenetic tools for neuron suppression via anion-mediated cellular hyperpolarization 1 7, 2 2,23 . Both members of the microbial rhodopsin superfamily, Cr ChR2 24 and Gt ACR1 22,25 share the common topology of seven transmembrane α-helices (TM1TM7), with the chromophore retinal bound to a lysine side chain 26 – 2 9 , and a high sequence identity in the central constriction site (see Fig. 1a), representing the functional core of the protein, suggesting that they operate by similar reaction mechanisms. Cr ChR2 has been extensively studied using electrophysiological and spectroscopic methods 2,3, 30 – 3 2 . In our previous work, we investigated the physiological and biophysical mechanisms of Cr ChR2 with time-resolved Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, a powerful technique for studying molecular processes and obtaining dynamic information at high spatial and temporal resolution 33 – 3 8 . For microbial rhodopsins, light absorption by retinal triggers a photocycle involving several spectroscopically distinguishable intermediates 3 9 . FTIR has been particularly effective in characterizing structural changes in the photointermediates 4 0 . In the case of Cr ChR2, blue light excitation (λ = 470 nm) induces two parallel photoreaction cycles (see Supplementary Fig. 1) 4 1 . One of these is the so called "darkadapted" anti cycle, characterized by the exclusive occurrence of a C = N anti configuration of retinal and a well-conducting open state that decays relatively quickly. The other one is the slowly decaying "lightadapted" syn cycle, characterised by the 13 cis , C = N syn configuration of retinal and the presence of poorly conducting photoproducts 41 . Electrophysiological measurements show that under continuous illumination, the highly conductive anti -cycle is associated with a current peak that drops rapidly referred to as attenuation when Cr ChR2 switches to the lowconductivity syn cycle 33,4 1 (see Fig. 1b). Both cycles are spectroscopically distinguishable due to their cycle-specific retinal configurations. The spectroscopic marker band of the anti cycle is found at 1188 cm − 1 representing the C = N anti retinal configuration, while the marker band for the syn cycle is at 1154 cm − 1 , corresponding to the C = N syn retinal configuration 41 . In contrast to Cr ChR2, only a highly conductive photocycle actively operates in Gt ACR1 19,33 . The photocycle model by Sineshchekov et al. 19 , based on electrophysiological data, was significantly improved by Dreier et al. 33 using FTIR-spectroscopic measurements (see Fig. 2). After photoexcitation (λ = 480–500 nm) of the ground state, retinal in Gt ACR1 isomerizes from its all trans configuration to the 13 cis C = N anti configuration, initiating the K intermediate. Within 450 ns, K decays to the non-conducting L 1 /L 1 ' intermediate. As L 1 /L 1 ' decays, channel opening occurs in a two-step process with fast (18 µs) and slow (1.9 ms) phases, leading to the conducting L 2 intermediate. Channel closing also occurs in two steps, with the mechanistic closing happening in the transition from L 2 to M (35 ms). The photocurrent shuts down completely upon formation of the N/O intermediate, following the M intermediate, with a half-life of 107 ms. Finally, Gt ACR1 relaxes from the N/O intermediate a fast equilibrium that is difficult to dissect spectroscopically back to the ground state with a lifetime of 4.4 s 33 . There is no spectroscopic evidence for a syn cycle, as its typical marker band at 1154 cm − 1 is absent in the Gt ACR1 WT 3 3 . This is also reflected in the electrophysiological measurements, where photocurrent amplitudes are much higher than those observed in Cr ChR2, without significant current attenuation 1 5, 1 8, 1 9 . High photocurrents and low current inactivation levels in channelrhodopsins are highly desirable for optogenetic applications, as both features enable efficient, targeted stimulation of neurons. A fundamental prerequisite for the rational design of optimized optogenetic tools is a detailed functional understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying channel opening and closing at the atomic level. Therefore, we investigated the mechanistic role of the central gate, which is crucial for ion conductivity in channelrhodopsins 42 , by comparing the relatively ineffective Cr ChR2 to the highly effective Gt ACR1. To gain insights into the limiting characteristics of Cr ChR2, we performed mutagenesis on Gt ACR1 to convert it to a more Cr ChR2like variant. In doing so, we unexpectedly discovered a second photoactivatable state in addition to the Gt ACR1 ground state, which allows fast and efficient channel reopening. This second photoactivatable state explains the sustained high conductivity observed in electrophysiological studies under continuous illumination. Results and Discussion Gt ACR1 Variant Q46E To gain insights into the functional differences between Cr ChR2 and Gt ACR1, we compared the existing X-ray structures 24 , 25 of the central constriction sites, which represent the functional cores of both proteins, as shown in Fig. 1a. Cr ChR2 and Gt ACR1 exhibit high sequence identity in the central gate, with residues such as S63, E90, D253 and N258 in Cr ChR2 being conservatively substituted by S43, E68, D234 and N239 in Gt ACR1. Especially E90 in Cr ChR2 and E68 in Gt ACR1 are critical for the function of both proteins. E90 in Cr ChR2 is one of the key determinants of ion selectivity, and its deprotonation is linked to ion conductance after light adaptation 24 , 41 , 43 – 47 . In Gt ACR1, early deprotonation of E68 has been shown to be crucial for gate formation 18 , 19 , 48 . However, there are notable differences within the central constriction sites of Cr ChR2 and Gt ACR1. For example, L66, V94, and F226 in Cr ChR2 are replaced by Q46, Y72, and Y207 in Gt ACR1, making these latter residues promising targets for investigating the limiting characteristics of Cr ChR2. Among the residues of the central constriction site that are potential candidates responsible for attenuation, we focused on the most promising Gt ACR1 variant, Q46E, which exhibits electrophysiological features comparable to the wild type of Cr ChR2 15 (see Fig. 1b). Under continuous illumination, the variant displays a sharp current peak followed by current attenuation, which similar to Cr ChR2 15 might be due to the occurrence of a low conducting syn cycle in this variant. To test this hypothesis, rapid-scan FTIR measurements were carried out at ambient temperature and compared to wild type measurements. The major difference between the WT and the variant lies in the reaction rates, expressed in the halflives derived from global fit analysis, as the Gt ACR1 variant Q46E is significantly slower than the wild type. In this case, only the halflives T 4 T 6 were spectroscopically distinguished, as rapidscan measurements were performed and T 1 T 3 fall outside the time-resolution limit. As summarized in Supplementary Table 1, the variant's half-life T 4 is about five times slower than the WT, T 5 is about seven times slower, and T 6 is about twice as slow as the WT. Interestingly, the course of the key marker bands identified so far (see Supplementary Table 2 for a list of marker bands) of Gt ACR1 WT and its variant Q46E remain similar (see Fig. 3a/b). The conformational changes during channel opening and closing in the amide I region, visible at 1644 cm - 1 , as well as channel opening itself and the conducting state, visible at 1691 cm - 1 , follow the same pattern as described in literature for the wild type 33 . Furthermore, the protonated 13 cis retinal (1184 cm - 1 ) and the retinal C = C vibrations in the ground state (1529 cm - 1 ) could be readily followed. Overall, the entire mid-IR amplitude spectra from 1000–1800 cm − 1 for Gt ACR1 WT and Gt ACR1 Q46E are almost identical (see Fig. 3c), indicating nearly indistinguishable photocycle processes for both proteins. The only notable difference is a shift in the marker band of the protonated Schiff base in 13 cis configuration, which is shifted from 1184 to 1180 cm − 1 in the T 6 FTIR amplitude spectra. This shift could be explained by the altered electrostatic environment resulting from the change from glutamine to glutamate in the central constriction site. Most importantly, in both the WT and the Q46E variant of Gt ACR1, the band at 1154 cm − 1 , which is typical for a 13 cis C = N syn configuration in Cr ChR2, is absent (see Fig. 3c). This clearly contradicts our initial assumption that a syn cycle is responsible for the attenuated current in Q46E. The observed reduction in photocurrents in the Q46E variant must therefore be due to another cause. The extensive similarity between the UV/Vis and FTIR spectra suggests that Gt ACR1 WT and Q46E exhibit similar reaction mechanisms, except for the significantly decelerated photocyclic reaction rates in the variant. Since a syn cycle is ruled out, and the conductive state of the channel is relatively short (even the slow channel-closing lifetime is about 290 ms), compared to the long return time to the excitable ground state, due to the increased T 4 –T 6 half-lives, we conclude that the electrophysiologically observed attenuation is due to the accumulation of intermediates preceding the photoactivatable ground state. Given the above explanation, it is questionable why attenuation is almost absent in Gt ACR1 WT upon continuous illumination (see Fig. 3). The channel closes completely with a halflife of only 107 ms, compared to the long half-life of T 6 = 4.4 s for the return to the ground state. This should immediately enrich the nonconducting N/O intermediate, leading inevitably to conductive attenuation. However, as no attenuation occurs in WT Gt ACR1, we hypothesize that continuous photocycling is driven by the N/O intermediate, specifically through photoactivation of the O intermediate, whose retinal cofactor is already in the all trans configuration. This is a precondition that is otherwise only satisfied by the dark ground state. Repeated Photoexcitability of the Relaxing State To validate our new theory on the photocycle model and the potential initiation of another photocycle from the N/O intermediate more specifically, from the O intermediate we conducted additional investigations on the Gt ACR1 WT. These experiments provided more insights into the gating mechanism of Gt ACR1 WT, as detailed below. To test whether the hypothesis of additional excitability of the O intermediate applies to the Gt ACR1 WT, the proper timing for repeated excitation must be adjusted to ensure that the O intermediate is precisely targeted. Based on the known photocycle time constants, it was calculated that 1 second after the initial activation from the ground state, the M intermediate (which decays with a slow channelclosing halflife T 5 of 107 ms) is reduced to less than1 % of its initial value (see Supplementary Note 1), indicating that over 9 % of the protein has transitioned to the N/O intermediate. Similarly, it was calculated that the Gt ACR1 ground state is populated with only a negligible4 % after 1 second of activation, with 6 % of the proteins remaining in the N/O intermediate (see Supplementary Note 2). At this time point, a second flash was applied to initiate another photocycle, which was monitored by time-resolved FTIR spectroscopy. A comparison of the excitation spectra shows that efficient photoexcitation indeed occurred, with approximately 5 % of the sample being reexcited. Global fit analysis of the FTIR data obtained after the second laser flash revealed three distinct reaction steps. The amplitude spectra for these steps are similar to the last three partial reactions (T 4 –T 6 ) of the normal photocycle (see Fig. 4a) 33 . The halflives of the reactions after the first and second flashes are comparable for T 4 , but significantly slower for T 5 and T 6 following the second flash (see Fig. 4b/c and Supplementary Table 1). The amplitude spectra of the partial reactions after the first and second laser flashes show largely identical absorption bands (see Fig. 4a), suggesting that the secondary triggered photocycle is very similar to the first and that rapid channel opening occurs. The most prominent differences between the spectra from single and repeated exposure are observed in the amide I and amide II regions (see Fig. 4a). Specifically, in T 5 , shifts are observed from 1645 cm − 1 to 1635 cm − 1 and from 1659 cm − 1 to 1667 cm − 1 , indicating conformational changes in the protein backbone, and from 1555 cm − 1 to 1562 cm − 1 , indicating changes in the surrounding of the retinal. The most striking difference in the T 5 amplitude spectra is the band of protonated E68 at 1708 cm − 1 . Although still visible, this band is largely reduced after the second flash. For T 6 , shifts from 1640 cm − 1 to 1652 cm − 1 and from 1184 cm − 1 to 1180 cm − 1 occur (see Fig. 4a/f). The changes around 1640 cm − 1 are also associated with conformational changes in the protein backbone, while the shift of the 1184 cm − 1 band suggests alterations in the environment of protonated retinal in the 13 cis C = N anti SBH⁺ configuration. The 1691 cm − 1 band, which is attributed to conformational changes during pore formation, shows an increase in absorption with repeated excitation (see Fig. 4d). To determine whether the observed changes are intensified with increased exposure to activating light, spectral development was monitored under different illumination regimes: after one flash, two flashes, and five flashes (with 1 Hz repetition rate; see Fig. 4d/e), as well as after 30 s of continuous illumination (see Fig. 4f/g). Illumination after two and five flashes, as well as after 30 seconds, resulted in comparable halflives of the reactions, although T 4 and T 5 were slightly slower under continuous illumination (see Supplementary Table 1). In the amplitude spectra, the most prominent shift was observed at 1184 cm − 1 in the T 6 amplitude spectrum (see Fig. 4f/g), which shifted down to 1178 cm − 1 after the excitation with five flashes, while continuous illumination produced a shift to 1179 cm − 1 . Furthermore, it was observed that the amplitude assigned to the E68 band at 1708 cm − 1 decreased further with increasing exposure time, while the band at 1691 cm − 1 became more pronounced. (see Fig. 4d/e). In summary, the effects of repeated flash excitation or continuous illumination indicate various changes within the functionally active region, specifically the central gate of Gt ACR1. The decrease in the E68 band at 1708 cm − 1 (see Fig. 4f/g) demonstrates a lower degree of reprotonation with increased light exposure. Since the fast deprotonation of E68 is associated with the channel opening process 33 , 49 , the deprotonated state of glutamate may facilitate opening more readily than the state reached after full deprotonation and reprotonation, as observed after a single flash activation. The central constriction site may therefore exist in a “preopen state,” which allows for rapid channel opening upon excitation from the O intermediate. This interpretation is further supported by the increased formation of the band at 1691 cm − 1 during stronger light exposure (see Fig. 4f/g), which reflects alterations in the secondary structure during channel opening and clearly supports the buildup of the postulated preopen state of the ion channel. The environmental changes may also affect the neighboring protonated Schiff base, which explains the observed shift of the band of protonated 13 cis C = N anti retinal at 1184 cm − 1 (see Fig. 4d/e). Channel state after photoexcitation of the O intermediate A major question is whether the state of the ion channel is altered when the protein is excited from the ground state or from the O intermediate. Photoexcitation spectra, i.e., FTIR difference spectra directly recorded after flash activation, provide insight into such alterations. A comparison of the excitation spectra of Gt ACR1 WT after one, two, and five flashes, as well as with continuous exposure, reveals changes in the positive bands (see Fig. 5d). The positive bands in these spectra provide information about the reached intermediate, while the negative bands reflect changes in the ground state or the O intermediate respectively. With increasing light exposure, band shifts are observed from 1659 cm − 1 to 1667 cm − 1 (see Fig. 5a), from 1555 cm − 1 to 1562 cm − 1 (see Fig. 5b), and from 1184 cm − 1 to 1176 cm − 1 (see Fig. 5c). As previously described, the bands at 1659 cm − 1 and 1555 cm − 1 indicate changes in the backbone of the protein and surrounding the retinal. The 1184 cm − 1 band is a marker for the protonated 13 cis configuration of the retinal. Regarding the negative bands, a shift from 1645 cm − 1 to 1650 cm − 1 is observed. These shifts suggest that Gt ACR1 enters a related photocycle upon excitation of the O intermediate compared to the ground state, as the positive bands exhibit only minor changes. The bands most affected are those that provide information about the global structure of the protein, particularly those in the amide I and II regions. However, it is important to note that the increased band shifting observed under repeated exposure in the amplitude spectra is also present in the excitation spectra. Of particular importance is the following observation, illustrated in Fig. 5a: The negative band at 1708 cm − 1 , which represents the deprotonation of E68, diminishes under increased illumination conditions, consistent with the lack of reprotonation observed in the amplitude spectra of the corresponding photocycle. This indicates that E68 remains deprotonated throughout these conditions. The band at 1691 cm − 1 is associated with conformational changes during pore formation. The decrease in this band under strong illumination, where efficient ion current is observed, suggests that the pore is not fully closed and therefore does not need to open at the beginning of the photocycle. These two band changes are fully consistent with the previously described amplitude spectra, supporting the idea that E68 remains deprotonated under repeated excitation and that secondary structural changes occur during pore formation. Other retinal-related bands, such as 1184 cm − 1 (assigned to the C-C bond) and 1555 cm − 1 (assigned to the C = C bond), show slight shifts, indicating changes in the environment of the retinal. These findings further support our hypothesis that the changes induced by the deprotonation of E68, which contribute to pore formation in Gt ACR1, are pre-formed upon repeated excitation. This strengthens our postulate of a 'pre-opened' state in Gt ACR1, which, under continuous illumination, stabilizes and facilitates rapid channel opening. This process significantly contributes to the effectiveness of Gt ACR1, and helps explain the consistently high photocurrents observed in electrophysiological experiments 15 . The findings also apply to the Gt ACR1 variant Q46E. The high attenuation of the photocurrent observed in this variant, compared to the WT, can be attributed to the prolonged presence of the L 2 and M intermediates. During these states, the pore is in a non-conductive state, and since the retinal remains in the 13 cis configuration, no new excitation can occur. Once the O intermediate is reached, a photocycle is also initiated in the Q46E variant (see Supplementary Fig. 2). Extended photocycle model Our data allows us to expand the photochemical model of Gt ACR1 (see Fig. 6), as explained in detail below. According to our current view, the initial stages of the photocycle, as outlined in the introduction, remain unchanged. Photoexcitation (λ = 480–500 nm) of the ground state ACR1 leads to retinal isomerization, initiating the K intermediate, followed by the non-conducting L 1 /L 1 ’ intermediate and the conducting L 2 intermediate. Subsequently, channel closing occurs in two steps: from L 2 to M and from M to N/O. In the previous version of the cycle, Gt ACR1 relaxes into the ground state from the N/O intermediate with a halflife of 4.4 s, a process that still occurs without further photoexcitation. However, photoactivation of the O intermediate, which contains all trans retinal and the pore in a “preopen” state, generates a shortened photocycle. The first observable intermediate within our time resolution is L 2 , therefore we cannot characterize earlier intermediates. We hypothesize, that with the transition to the 13 cis configuration a shortlived K-like intermediate, which we refer to as K’, is reached before entering the known photocycle at the L 1 /L 1 ’ intermediate, followed by channel opening. The identification of the O intermediate as a photoactivatable state provides the opportunity to reconcile the apparently conflicting data from optical and FTIR spectroscopy using a flash activation setup, as well as electrophysiological measurements based on continuous illumination (see Fig. 2b). Gt ACR1 enters a highly conductive photocycle upon initial excitation, which is reflected in a high current deflection. Following excitation of the shortened cycle from the O intermediate by continuous exposure, the photocurrent remains elevated. The small current loss of Gt ACR1 observed in Fig. 2b can be explained by the retention time of the channel in non-conductive intermediates, such as the M or the N intermediate, as only the O intermediate is excitable. This insights offer a new perspective on the previously published data by Szundi et al. 50 , 51 , proposing a parallel photocycle kinetic model and a red-absorbing intermediate as open channel state. Furthermore, new approaches for improving Cr ChR2 for optogenetic applications, aiming to increase the channel's conductivity, can be found based on these findings. Conclusion During our investigations of the Gt ACR1 variant Q46E, in an effort to gain further insights into the strong attenuation effect associated with the syn photocycle, we observed the absence of the typical marker band for 13 cis retinal in syn configuration, as well as significantly retarded partial reaction rates, leading to an enrichment of non-conducting intermediates. This raised the question of the wild-type kinetic behavior, prompting us to investigate distinct illumination schemes. We found that with the arrival of the all trans configuration of retinal at the O intermediate, another round of the photocycle can be triggered by flash irradiation. Amplitude spectra derived from global fit analysis, along with photoexcitation spectra, showed a high degree of resemblance between the O intermediate-generated and the ground-state-generated courses, suggesting that their functional behavior is closely related. Subtle alterations in the evolution of secondary structural changes and protonation events within the central constriction site of the channel such as changes in the protonation of E68 or signs of pore formation led us to propose a so-called “preopen” state, which facilitates easier channel opening. Our investigations of Gt ACR1 have revealed that the high efficiency of the channel is due to the second photoactivatable state, which allows the photocycle to be reexcited from the O intermediate and is associated with the formation of a “preopen” state. This finding offers new approaches for improving Cr ChR2 for optogenetic applications, aiming to increase the channel's conductivity. Methods Biochemical methods Site specfic mutagenesis and preparation of mutant DNA If not indicated otherwise, all molecular biological work was carried out as described in Dreier et al. 33 . To obtain the Q46E variant we used the site-specific mutagenesis Quik-change protocol using the template plasmid pPIC9k-ACR1-His10 and the oligonucleotide primers GTTGTTTCTGCTTGT GAA GTTTTCTTTATGG and CCATAAAGAAAACTTCAC AAG CAGAAACAAC. Transformation of Pichia pastoris, mutant selection and ACR1 expression Pichia pastoris strain SMD 1168 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA) is streaked onto a YPD agar plate and incubated for 72 h at 30°C. Subsequently, 10 ml of YPD medium is inoculated with a single colony from the YPD plate and shaken overnight at 30°C and 150 rpm. The next day 50 ml of YPD medium are inoculated with the 10 mL culture to an OD 600 of 0.2 and shaken at 30°C and 150 rpm until an OD 600 of 1-1.6 is reached. After centrifugation at 1500 g and 4°C for 5 min the resulting sediment is resuspended in 50 ml sterile ice-cold water and centrifuged again under the same conditions. The sediment is resuspended in 25 ml sterile ice-cold water followed by another centrifugation at the same settings. Finally, the sediment is resuspended in 2 ml of 1 M sterile ice-cold sorbitol and centrifuged again as previously described. After removal of the supernatant, the cells are taken up in 100 µl sterile ice-cold sorbitol. Subsequently, 12 µg of PmeI linearized DNA is added to 80 µl of the cells, incubated on ice for 5 min and transferred using electroporation at 1.5 kV, 25 µF and 200 Ω. Immediately afterwards, 1 ml of ice-cold 1 M sorbitol is added to the mixture, which is then shaken for 60 min at 30°C and 450 rpm. The transformed cells, now containing expression vectors with HIS4 genes, are streaked out on a MD plate and incubated at 30°C for 72 h to select for the uptake of the plasmid. Colonies were picked and transferred to plates containing the selectant Geneticin at increasing concentrations (0.25 mg/ml, 0.5 mg/ml, 0.75 mg/ml and 1 mg/ml) and incubated at 30°C for one week to check for the number of copies. Thereafter, 6 precultures are prepared by inoculation of from 50 mL BMGY, with a colony which survived the highest geneticin concentration, and shaken at 30°C and 170 rpm. By use of PCR from precultures positive clones carrying the desired gene fragment are verified and used to inoculate 1 l of BMGY medium 52 . The culture is shaken at 30°C and 100 rpm overnight. To prepare the main culture, 6x 1 litre of BMGY medium is inoculated with the preculture to a starting OD 600 of 1. In addition, 10 µl all- trans retinal in 10 ml 100 %methanol is added to each flask 53 , 54 . The cultures are shaken at 30°C and 90 rpm. After 6 h, 5 µl all- trans retinal is added to 5 ml 100 % methnol. After 24 h, 10 µl all- trans retinal in 10 ml 100 % methnol is added again as at the beginning and after 48 h 5 µl all- trans retinal in 5 ml 100 % methnol is added. After shaking another 6 h, the cultures are harvested for 15 minutes at 5000 rpm and 15°C in an Avanti centrifuge. The sediments are resuspended in 20 ml lysis buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7,5, 5 % glycrol, 1 mM EDTA, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF) and stored at -20°C. Membrane preparation and protein purification Cells were disrupted by 15 cycles at 1500 bar using a microfluidizer M-110L (Microfluidics Corp., Newton, MA) and lysis buffer. Non-disrupted cells and large debris are removed by centrifugation for 15 min at 5000 rpm and 4°C. The membrane containing supernatant is sedimented by ultracentrifugation for 1 h 15 min at 45000 rpm and 4°C. The obtained membrane components are homogenised in a 9-fold amount of solubilisation buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF, 1% (w/v) n-Dodecyl-beta-maltosid) and solubilised overnight at 4°C under stirring in the dark or under red light. After addition of 50 mM imidazole another ultracentrifugation (1 h 15 min at 45000 rpm and 4°C) is performed to remove unsolubilized membranes and the supernatant is used for affinity chromatography. Gt ACR1 purification was performed by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography using a HisTrap™ Fast Flow 5 ml column (Cytiva, Dassel, Germany) and a step gradient elution (buffer A: 20 mM Hepes, 100 mM NaCl, 0,15% DM, pH 7.5; buffer B: 20 mM Hepes, 100 mM NaCl, 0,15% DM, 500 mM imidazol, pH 7.5). Coloured fractions are pooled and loaded on a gel filtration column using a HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 200 pg (GE Healthcare, Düsseldorf, Germany), and eluted with buffer A, yielding purified Gt ACR1, which is characterized by SDS-Page and Western blotting. Reconstitution of GtACR1 using egg phosphatidylcholine and preparation of samples for FTIR spectroscopys To simulate conditions of a natural lipid environment 55 in spectroscopic measurements, purified Gt ACR1 are reconstituted into egg phosphatidylcholine (Avanti Polar Lipids, AL). The lipids are solubilized with 0.15 %n-Dodecyl-beta-maltosid in 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl by incubation at 50°C for 10 min. Solubilized lipids and purified Gt ACR1 are mixed at a 2:1 ratio (w/w, lipid to protein) and incubated for 30 min. The detergent is removed overnight by adsorption on Bio-Beads SM 2 (BioRad, CA) using 40:1 (w/w, Bio-Beads to detergent) at room temperature. The following day this procedure of detergent removal is repeated for 4 h. The resulting suspension containing proteoliposomes and buffer is further processed by separating the proteoliposome suspension from the beads and ultracentrifugation at 55.000 rpm for 3 h using a Thermo Scientific MTX150 micro-ultracentrifuge with a S55-A2 rotor. To assemble the sample, two CaF 2 windows (Ø 2 cm, 2 mm thickness, one of them with a 10 µm deepened area 1 cm in diameter) were cleaned with detergent, isopropyl alcohol and de-ionized water. The edge of one window was greased with a thin layer of silicon grease to seal the sample. The pelleted protein/phospholipid sample containing either wildtype or mutant full-length Gt ACR1 is applied to the deepened window and covered by the second window to obtain an optical path length between 5 and 10 µm. The double window stack containing samples are sealed, placed to a metal cuvette and mounted to the FTIR spectrometer (Bruker Vertex 80v, Bruker Corporation, MA, USA) at 21°C. Samples were equilibrated overnight. Spectroscopic methods FTIR-experiments Time-resolved FTIR difference spectroscopy was performed to gain insight in the changes upon illumination. After sample equilibration, background spectra were taken (400 scans) and the samples were illuminated with a short laser pulse of a Minilite Nd:YAG laser (Continuum, Pessac, France, λ max : 532 nm, 6 ns pulse) in case of single- and multi-flash measurements. For continuous illumination measurements green LED lights were used (λ max : 525 nm). Measurements were performed in the rapid-scan mode of a Vertex 80 v spectrometer and OPUS 7.2 software (Bruker Corporation), an Adwin Pro II A/D converter and ADbasic 6 software (Jäger Computergesteuerte Messtechnik GmbH), and a Lecroy WaveRunner HRO64zi oscilloscope with WaveRunner 6 Zi Oscilloscope Firmware version 6.6.0.5 (Teledyne LeCroy) and MatLab R2015a (The MathWorks, Inc.). Data between 1900 and 1000 cm − 1 were collected with a spectral resolution of 4 cm − 1 in the double-sided forward-backward data acquisition mode with a scanner speed of 120 kHz. For the Fourier-transformation, a zerofilling factor of 4 and Norton-Beer weak apodization was applied. Global fit analysis When it comes to the analysis of the time-resolved data a global fit 56 in MatLab (The MathWorks, MA, USA) and in OPUS (Bruker Corporation) was used. The time-resolved absorbance change ΔA (ν, t) of Gt ACR1 measurements is described by the absorbance change induced by photoactivation a 0 (ν) followed by three exponential functions fitting the amplitudes a for each wavenumber ν (Eq. (1)). $$\:\varDelta\:A\left(\nu\:,\:t\right)=\:{a}_{0}\left(\nu\:\right)+\:{a}_{1}\left(\nu\:\right)\left(1-{e}^{-{k}_{1}t}\right)+{a}_{2}\left(\nu\:\right)\left(1-{e}^{-{k}_{2}t}\right)+{a}_{3}\left(\nu\:\right)\left(1-{e}^{-{k}_{3}t}\right)$$ Dreier et al. identified a 1 (ν, t) as the transition from L 2 to M, a 2 (ν, t) as transition from M to N/O and a 3 (ν, t) as transition from N/O to the ground state ACR1 33 . In the figures disappearing bands face upward and appearing bands face downward. Rapid-Scan spectra were obtained from a total of 48 measurements from three protein samples per measurement condition. Statistics and reproducibility Rapid-scan spectra were obtained from a total of 48 measurements from three protein samples per measurement condition. The number of repetitions was adjusted according to data quality. IR-Measurements with large baseline drifts were excluded. Declarations Data availability The raw data of the spectroscopic measurements as well as the simulation trajectories and input files will be provided upon individual request by the corresponding authors. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Author contributions K.G. obtained the funding; K.G., M.L., T.R. and C.K. designed the research; K.L., M.J.N., L-M.H., and P.A performed the research; K.L. performed FTIR measurements with the help of M.J.N. and L-M.H. supervised by K.G., T.R., and C.K.; K.L. and L-M.H performed biochemistry supervised by M.L.; all authors analyzed the data; K.L., K.G., M.L., T.R., and C.K. wrote the paper with edits from all co-authors. Acknowledgements We thank Elena Govorunova for providing the raw electrophysiological data for Fig. 1 a. We thank Max-Aylmer Dreier for all the support and helpful discussions as well as Simon Völker and Olga Zapolskaia, who contributed to the project during their respective thesis. We acknowledge Harald Chorongiewski for his technical support with the spectroscopic setup and Gabriele Smuda for molecular biology support. This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) Individual Research Grant, “Molecular mechanisms of cation and anion-conducting channelrhodopsins” (GE 599/23 − 1) to K.G. and the DFG Priority Program SPP1926 (GE 599/19 − 2 and GE 599/19 − 1) to K.G. Further support was provided by the Ministry for Culture and Science (MKW) of North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) through grant 111.08.03.05- 133974 to K.G. and the Protein Research Unit Ruhr within Europe (PURE) funded by the Ministry of Innovation, Science and Research (MIWF) of North-Rhine Westphalia (Germany) to K.G. References Sineshchekov, O.A., Jung, K.-H., Spudich, J.L.: Two rhodopsins mediate phototaxis to low- and high-intensity light in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 99 (13), 8689–8694 (2002). 10.1073/pnas.122243399 Nagel, G., Ollig, D., Fuhrmann, M., et al.: Channelrhodopsin-1: a light-gated proton channel in green algae. Science. 296 (5577), 2395–2398 (2002). 10.1126/science.1072068 Nagel, G., Szellas, T., Huhn, W., et al.: Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 100 (24), 13940–13945 (2003). 10.1073/pnas.1936192100 Suzuki, T., Yamasaki, K., Fujita, S., et al.: Archaeal-type rhodopsins in Chlamydomonas: model structure and intracellular localization. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 301 (3), 711–717 (2003). 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)03079-6 Bregestovski, P., Mukhtarov, M.: Optogenetics: Perspectives in Biomedical Research (Review). Sovrem Tehnol Med. 8 (4), 212–221 (2016). 10.17691/stm2016.8.4.26 Deisseroth, K., Optogenetics: Nat. Methods. 8 (1), 26–29 (2011). 10.1038/nmeth.f.324 Govorunova, E.G., Sineshchekov, O.A., Li, H., Spudich, J.L.: Microbial Rhodopsins: Diversity, Mechanisms, and Optogenetic Applications. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 86 , 845–872 (2017). 10.1146/annurev-biochem-101910-144233 Kim, C.K., Adhikari, A., Deisseroth, K.: Integration of optogenetics with complementary methodologies in systems neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18 (4), 222–235 (2017). 10.1038/nrn.2017.15 Boyden, E.S., Zhang, F., Bamberg, E., Nagel, G., Deisseroth, K.: Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (9), 1263–1268 (2005). 10.1038/nn1525 Kojima, K., Watanabe, H.C., Doi, S., et al.: Mutational analysis of the conserved carboxylates of anion channelrhodopsin-2 (ACR2) expressed in Escherichia coli and their roles in anion transport. Biophys. Physicobiol. 15 , 179–188 (2018). 10.2142/biophysico.15.0_179 Kuleshova, E.P.: Optogenetics – New Potentials for Electrophysiology. Neurosci. Behav. Physi. 49 (2), 169–177 (2019). 10.1007/s11055-019-00711-5 Berry, M.H., Holt, A., Salari, A., et al.: Restoration of high-sensitivity and adapting vision with a cone opsin. Nat. Commun. 10 (1), 1221 (2019). 10.1038/s41467-019-09124-x Kravitz, A.V., Freeze, B.S., Parker, P.R.L., et al.: Regulation of parkinsonian motor behaviours by optogenetic control of basal ganglia circuitry. Nature. 466 (7306), 622–626 (2010). 10.1038/nature09159 Zenchak, J.R., Palmateer, B., Dorka, N., et al.: Bioluminescence-driven optogenetic activation of transplanted neural precursor cells improves motor deficits in a Parkinson's disease mouse model. J. Neurosci. Res. 98 (3), 458–468 (2020). 10.1002/jnr.24237 Govorunova, E.G., Sineshchekov, O.A., Janz, R., Liu, X., Spudich, J.L.: NEUROSCIENCE. Natural light-gated anion channels: A family of microbial rhodopsins for advanced optogenetics. Science. 349 (6248), 647–650 (2015). 10.1126/science.aaa7484 Govorunova, E.G., Sineshchekov, О.А., Spudich, J.L.: Three Families of Channelrhodopsins and Their Use in Optogenetics (review). Neurosci. Behav. Physi. 49 (2), 163–168 (2019). 10.1007/s11055-019-00710-6 Li, H., Huang, C.-Y., Elena, G., Govorunova, C.T., Schafer, O.A., Sineshchekov, M., Wang, L., Zheng: John L Spudich. Crystal structure of a natural light-gated anion channelrhodopsin. eLife Updated January 7 , (2019) Sineshchekov, O.A., Govorunova, E.G., Li, H., Spudich, J.L.: Gating mechanisms of a natural anion channelrhodopsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 112 (46), 14236–14241 (2015). 10.1073/pnas.1513602112 Sineshchekov, O.A., Li, H., Govorunova, E.G., Spudich, J.L.: Photochemical reaction cycle transitions during anion channelrhodopsin gating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 113 (14), E1993–2000 (2016). 10.1073/pnas.1525269113 Govorunova, E.G., Sineshchekov, O.A., Rodarte, E.M., et al.: The Expanding Family of Natural Anion Channelrhodopsins Reveals Large Variations in Kinetics, Conductance, and Spectral Sensitivity. Sci. Rep. 7 , 43358 (2017). 10.1038/srep43358 Govorunova, E.G., Sineshchekov, O.A., Hemmati, R., et al.: Extending the Time Domain of Neuronal Silencing with Cryptophyte Anion Channelrhodopsins. eNeuro. 5 (3) (2018). 10.1523/ENEURO.0174-18.2018 Kim, Y.S., Kato, H.E., Yamashita, K., et al.: Crystal structure of the natural anion-conducting channelrhodopsin GtACR1. Nature. 561 (7723), 343–348 (2018). 10.1038/s41586-018-0511-6 Acharya, A.R., Vandekerckhove, B., Larsen, L.E., et al.: In vivoblue light illumination for optogenetic inhibition: effect on local temperature and excitability of the rat hippocampus. J. Neural Eng. 18 (6) (2021). 10.1088/1741-2552/ac3ef4 Volkov, O., Kovalev, K., Polovinkin, V., et al.: Structural insights into ion conduction by channelrhodopsin 2. Science. 358 (6366) (2017). 10.1126/science.aan8862 Li, H., Huang, C.-Y., Govorunova, E.G., et al.: Crystal structure of a natural light-gated anion channelrhodopsin. Elife. 8 (2019). 10.7554/eLife.41741 Spudich, J.L., Sineshchekov, O.A., Govorunova, E.G.: Mechanism divergence in microbial rhodopsins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1837 (5), 546–552 (2014). 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.06.006 Ernst, O.P., Lodowski, D.T., Elstner, M., Hegemann, P., Brown, L.S., Kandori, H.: Microbial and animal rhodopsins: structures, functions, and molecular mechanisms. Chem. Rev. 114 (1), 126–163 (2014). 10.1021/cr4003769 Kandori, H.: Biophysics of rhodopsins and optogenetics. Biophys. Rev. 12 (2), 355–361 (2020). 10.1007/s12551-020-00645-0 Govorunova, E.G., Sineshchekov, O.A., Spudich, J.L.: Emerging Diversity of Channelrhodopsins and Their Structure-Function Relationships. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 15 , 800313 (2021). 10.3389/fncel.2021.800313 Gerwert, K.: Channelrhodopsin reveals its dark secrets. Science. 358 (6366), 1000–1001 (2017). 10.1126/science.aar2299 Deisseroth, K., Hegemann, P.: The form and function of channelrhodopsin. Science. 357 (6356) (2017). 10.1126/science.aan5544 Schneider, F., Grimm, C., Hegemann, P.: Biophysics of Channelrhodopsin. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 44 , 167–186 (2015). 10.1146/annurev-biophys-060414-034014 Dreier, M.-A., Althoff, P., Norahan, M.J., et al.: Time-resolved spectroscopic and electrophysiological data reveal insights in the gating mechanism of anion channelrhodopsin. Commun. Biol. 4 (1), 578 (2021). 10.1038/s42003-021-02101-5 Garczarek, F., Gerwert, K.: Functional waters in intraprotein proton transfer monitored by FTIR difference spectroscopy. Nature. 439 (7072), 109–112 (2006). 10.1038/nature04231 Garczarek, F., Brown, L.S., Lanyi, J.K., Gerwert, K.: Proton binding within a membrane protein by a protonated water cluster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 102 (10), 3633–3638 (2005). 10.1073/pnas.0500421102 Barth, A.: Infrared spectroscopy of proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1767 (9), 1073–1101 (2007). 10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.06.004 Barth, A., Zscherp, C.: What vibrations tell us about proteins. Q. Rev. Biophys. 35 (4), 369–430 (2002). 10.1017/S0033583502003815 Ataka, K., Kottke, T., Heberle, J.: Thinner, smaller, faster: IR techniques to probe the functionality of biological and biomimetic systems. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 49 (32), 5416–5424 (2010). 10.1002/anie.200907114 Kandori, H.: Ion-pumping microbial rhodopsins. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2 , 52 (2015). 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00052 Ogren, J.I., Yi, A., Mamaev, S., Li, H., Spudich, J.L., Rothschild, K.J.: Proton transfers in a channelrhodopsin-1 studied by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectroscopy and site-directed mutagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 290 (20), 12719–12730 (2015). 10.1074/jbc.M114.634840 Kuhne, J., Vierock, J., Tennigkeit, S.A., et al.: Unifying photocycle model for light adaptation and temporal evolution of cation conductance in channelrhodopsin-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 116 (19), 9380–9389 (2019). 10.1073/pnas.1818707116 Sineshchekov, O.A., Govorunova, E.G., Li, H., Wang, X., Spudich, J.L.: The photoactive site modulates current rectification and channel closing in the natural anion channelrhodopsin Gt ACR1 ; (2019) Kuhne, J., Eisenhauer, K., Ritter, E., Hegemann, P., Gerwert, K., Bartl, F.: Early formation of the ion-conducting pore in channelrhodopsin-2. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54 (16), 4953–4957 (2015). 10.1002/anie.201410180 Eisenhauer, K., Kuhne, J., Ritter, E., et al.: In channelrhodopsin-2 Glu-90 is crucial for ion selectivity and is deprotonated during the photocycle. J. Biol. Chem. 287 (9), 6904–6911 (2012). 10.1074/jbc.M111.327700 Ruffert, K., Himmel, B., Lall, D., et al.: Glutamate residue 90 in the predicted transmembrane domain 2 is crucial for cation flux through channelrhodopsin 2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 410 (4), 737–743 (2011). 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.06.024 Lórenz-Fonfría, V.A., Heberle, J.: Channelrhodopsin unchained: structure and mechanism of a light-gated cation channel. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1837 (5), 626–642 (2014). 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.10.014 Lórenz-Fonfría, V.A., Resler, T., Krause, N., et al.: Transient protonation changes in channelrhodopsin-2 and their relevance to channel gating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 110 (14), E1273–E1281 (2013). 10.1073/pnas.1219502110 Tsujimura, M., Kojima, K., Kawanishi, S., Sudo, Y., Ishikita, H.: Proton-mediated gating mechanism of anion channelrhodopsin-1 ; (2021) Shikakura, T., Cheng, C., Hasegawa, T., Hayashi, S.: Exploring Protonation State, Ion Binding, and Photoactivated Channel Opening of an Anion Channelrhodopsin by Molecular Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B. 128 (36), 8613–8627 (2024). 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c03216 Szundi, I., Kliger, D.S.: The open channel state in anion channelrhodopsin GtACR1 is a red-absorbing intermediate. Biophys. J. 123 (8), 940–946 (2024). 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.03.006 Szundi, I., Kliger, D.S.: Parallel photocycle kinetic model of anion channelrhodopsin GtACR1 function. Biophys. J. 123 (12), 1735–1750 (2024). 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.05.016 Radu, I., Bamann, C., Nack, M., Nagel, G., Bamberg, E., Heberle, J.: Conformational changes of channelrhodopsin-2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (21), 7313–7319 (2009). 10.1021/ja8084274 Karbalaei, M., Rezaee, S.A., Farsiani, H.: Pichia pastoris: A highly successful expression system for optimal synthesis of heterologous proteins. J. Cell. Physiol. 235 (9), 5867–5881 (2020). 10.1002/jcp.29583 Macauley-Patrick, S., Fazenda, M.L., McNeil, B., Harvey, L.M.: Heterologous protein production using the Pichia pastoris expression system. Yeast. 22 (4), 249–270 (2005). 10.1002/yea.1208 Stritt, P., Jawurek, M., Hauser, K.: Mid-IR quantum cascade laser spectroscopy to resolve lipid dynamics during the photocycle of bacteriorhodopsin. J. Chem. Phys. 158 (15) (2023). 10.1063/5.0139808 Kötting, C., Gerwert, K.: Proteins in action monitored by time-resolved FTIR spectroscopy. Chemphyschem. 6 (5), 881–888 (2005). 10.1002/cphc.200400504 Additional Declarations There is NO Competing Interest. Supplementary Files ManuskriptPaperACR1finalSupportingInformation.docx Supplemental Information Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5677201","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":405752736,"identity":"90fe6ba1-05b8-415c-a638-8ee80c116c94","order_by":0,"name":"Carsten Kötting","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3599-9657","institution":"Ruhr-University Bochum","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Carsten","middleName":"","lastName":"Kötting","suffix":""},{"id":405752737,"identity":"651a11c4-58d2-40b0-85c2-34eb3a8ef295","order_by":1,"name":"Kristin Labudda","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0548-3585","institution":"Ruhr-University Bochum","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kristin","middleName":"","lastName":"Labudda","suffix":""},{"id":405752738,"identity":"2787f539-5e2e-40e7-b74d-b39116ae61cb","order_by":2,"name":"Mohamad Norahan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ruhr-University Bochum","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mohamad","middleName":"","lastName":"Norahan","suffix":""},{"id":405752739,"identity":"683b8382-5938-4a0c-9092-1705793876de","order_by":3,"name":"Lisa-Marie Hübner","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ruhr-University Bochum","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lisa-Marie","middleName":"","lastName":"Hübner","suffix":""},{"id":405752740,"identity":"77834eb0-7701-40a5-b2e2-79ee3847201a","order_by":4,"name":"Philipp Althoff","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ruhr-University Bochum","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Philipp","middleName":"","lastName":"Althoff","suffix":""},{"id":405752741,"identity":"3c47813d-9e36-44a4-9109-51d8b476a958","order_by":5,"name":"Klaus Gerwert","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ruhr University Bochum","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Klaus","middleName":"","lastName":"Gerwert","suffix":""},{"id":405752742,"identity":"c7f9c713-d10c-4555-b1eb-4afeaead296a","order_by":6,"name":"Mathias Lübben","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mathias","middleName":"","lastName":"Lübben","suffix":""},{"id":405752743,"identity":"a9638407-141a-46d3-a08c-900976be9bae","order_by":7,"name":"Till Rudack","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2693-9561","institution":"Ruhr University Bochum","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Till","middleName":"","lastName":"Rudack","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-12-19 13:36:16","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5677201/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5677201/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":78698781,"identity":"3e77b3f6-d84a-4e13-a057-44dd35adc84d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-17 18:15:18","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":127407,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eStructural and functional comparison of \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCr\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eChR2 and \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGt\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eACR1 a)\u003c/strong\u003e Structural alignment of the central constriction site residues of \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 (green amino acid carbon atoms) from PDB-ID 6EID\u003csup\u003e21\u003c/sup\u003e and \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 (gray amino acid carbon atoms) from PDB-ID 6EDQ\u003csup\u003e22\u003c/sup\u003e. The retinal (black carbon atoms) is taken from \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1. Nitrogen atoms are coloured blue and oxygen atoms red. \u003cstrong\u003eb)\u003c/strong\u003e Photocurrents of \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 WT, \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 WT and \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 Q46E. The shown photocurrents are a response of \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 and \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 (data replotted from Govorunova et al., 2015, Fig. 1D12) and \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 Q46E (data replotted from Kim et al., 2018, Extended Data Fig. 8) to a 1\u0026nbsp;s light pulse. \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 shows the characteristic decay of the photocurrent upon continuous illumination. \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 produces a significantly larger photocurrent compared to \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 and does not display the described inactivation of the photocurrent. However, channel closing is much slower in \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 compared to \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2. The photocurrent of the \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 variant Q46E shows a very similar profile to that of \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2, although the signal is smaller.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Picture1.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5677201/v1/bd96fc095a0fcbc068b81a5a.jpg"},{"id":78698782,"identity":"5886cd1c-488e-4e7c-8622-3345264a35ab","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-17 18:15:18","extension":"jpg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":131062,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePhotocycle model of \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGt\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eACR1\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003ea)\u003c/strong\u003e. The photocycle model is modified after Figure 4 from Dreier et al.\u003csup\u003e33\u003c/sup\u003e. After excitation of the \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 ground state the retinal isomerizes from all‑\u003cem\u003etrans\u003c/em\u003e to the 13‑\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e configuration, leading to the K Intermediate, which then decays to the non‑conducting L\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e/L\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e’ intermediates (450\u0026nbsp;ns). Channel opening occurs in a two‑step process with fast (18\u0026nbsp;µs) and slow (1.9\u0026nbsp;ms) channel opening, leading to the conducting L\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e intermediate (highlighted in blue). Channel closing takes place in the transition from L\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e to M (35\u0026nbsp;ms). Due to the equilibrium of L\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e and M, the photocurrent does not disappear completely until the formation of the N/O intermediate (107\u0026nbsp;ms). Finally, \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 relaxes into the ground state from the N/O intermediate. \u003cstrong\u003eb)\u003c/strong\u003e Illustration of the structural formulae of the retinal configurations that occur during the photocycle. Shown are all‑\u003cem\u003etrans\u003c/em\u003e C=N‑\u003cem\u003eanti\u003c/em\u003e retinal with protonated Schiff base (grey), 13‑\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e C=N‑\u003cem\u003eanti\u003c/em\u003e retinal with protonated Schiff base (blue) and 13‑\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e C=N‑\u003cem\u003eanti\u003c/em\u003e retinal with deprotonated Schiff base (orange). The colours of the boxes in A match the colours of the corresponding retinal conformation.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Picture2.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5677201/v1/98c9e0bb4233bc48979b8309.jpg"},{"id":78699103,"identity":"cb099bcf-b169-46ba-9122-a7b40b4a7846","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-17 18:23:18","extension":"jpg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":174825,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eComparison of the spectroscopic data from \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGt\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eACR1 WT and its variant Q46E. a)/b)\u003c/strong\u003e Time course of \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 marker absorption bands in the \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 WT and the variant Q46E. The time resolved data was obtained from rapid-scan FTIR difference spectroscopic measurements. The band assignment is based on the work by Dreier et. al.\u003csup\u003e33\u003c/sup\u003e assigning the 1644\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e band (light blue) to conformational changes during channel opening and closing in the amide I region, the 1691\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e band (pink) to channel opening and therefore the conducting state, the 1184\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e band (black) to protonated 13‑\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e retinal and the 1529\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e band (orange) to the retinal C=C vibrations in the ground state. \u003cstrong\u003ec)\u003c/strong\u003e Comparison of the amplitude spectra from \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 WT (black) and \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 Q46E (red). Shown are the reactions from L\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e to M (WT T\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e= 43.7\u0026nbsp;ms, Q46E T\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e=291.74\u0026nbsp;ms), from M to N/O (WT T\u003csub\u003e5\u003c/sub\u003e= 149.95\u0026nbsp;ms, Q46E T\u003csub\u003e5\u003c/sub\u003e=1145.42\u0026nbsp;ms) and from N/O to ground state (WT T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e= 15.9\u0026nbsp;s, Q46E T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e=32.66\u0026nbsp;s). Due to the low amplitude of some spectra, they have been amplified as indicated. An enlarged extract of the \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 amplitude spectra at T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e of the reaction of \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 WT and \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 Q46E is displayed, showing no absorption of a \u003cem\u003esyn\u003c/em\u003e‑marker band at 1154\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e in either the WT or the variant and the shift from 1184\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e towards 1180\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e in the variant.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Picture3.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5677201/v1/a99e44eacedc018b1bfe0dd6.jpg"},{"id":78698791,"identity":"18cc96dd-5802-4399-8b5a-b1cf01c449eb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-17 18:15:18","extension":"jpg","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":397177,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eComparison of single flash and multi flash experiments of \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGt\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eACR1 WT\u003c/strong\u003e. \u003cstrong\u003ea)\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 amplitude spectra of the reaction after the first flash (black) and the second flash (red). Shown are the reactions from L\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e to M (1\u003csup\u003est\u003c/sup\u003e flash T\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e= 44\u0026nbsp;ms, 2\u003csup\u003end\u003c/sup\u003e flash T\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e=88\u0026nbsp;ms), from M to N/O (1\u003csup\u003est\u003c/sup\u003e flash T\u003csub\u003e5\u003c/sub\u003e= 150\u0026nbsp;ms, 2\u003csup\u003end\u003c/sup\u003e flash T\u003csub\u003e5\u003c/sub\u003e= 1438\u0026nbsp;ms) and from N/O to ground state (1\u003csup\u003est\u003c/sup\u003e flash T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e= 16\u0026nbsp;s, 2\u003csup\u003end\u003c/sup\u003e flash T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e= 93\u0026nbsp;s). Due to the low amplitude of the T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e spectra and the spectra after the second flash, they have been amplified as indicated. \u003cstrong\u003eb)/c)\u003c/strong\u003e Time course of \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 marker absorption bands after one flash (b) and after the second flash (c). The time resolved data was obtained from rapid-scan FTIR difference spectroscopic measurements. The band assignment is based on the work by Dreier et. al.\u003csup\u003e30\u003c/sup\u003e assigning the 1644\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e band (light blue) to conformational changes during channel opening and closing in the amide\u0026nbsp;I region, the 1691\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e band (magenta) to channel opening and therefore the conducting state, the 1184\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e band (black) to protonated 13‑\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e retinal and the 1529\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e band (blue) to the retinal C=C vibrations in the ground state. \u003cstrong\u003ed)\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 amplitude spectra at\u003csub\u003e \u003c/sub\u003eT\u003csub\u003e6 \u003c/sub\u003eof the reaction after one flash (black, t\u003csub\u003e1/2\u003c/sub\u003e= 16\u0026nbsp;s), two flashes (grey, t\u003csub\u003e1/2\u003c/sub\u003e= 93\u0026nbsp;s) and five flashes (red, t\u003csub\u003e1/2\u003c/sub\u003e= 69\u0026nbsp;s). Spectra were scaled to the 1531\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e marker band for all‑\u003cem\u003etrans\u003c/em\u003e retinal. A reduction in the amplitude of the band at 1708\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e and an amplification in the amplitude at 1691\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e can be observed. \u003cstrong\u003ee)\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 amplitude spectra at T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e of the reaction after one flash (black, t\u003csub\u003e1/2\u003c/sub\u003e= 16\u0026nbsp;s) and 30\u0026nbsp;s of continuous illumination (red, t\u003csub\u003e1/2\u003c/sub\u003e= 68\u0026nbsp;s). Spectra were scaled to the 1531\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e marker band for all‑\u003cem\u003etrans\u003c/em\u003e retinal. A reduction in the amplitude of the bands at 1708\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e and 1691\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e can be observed. \u003cstrong\u003ef)\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 amplitude spectra at T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e of the reaction after one flash (black, t\u003csub\u003e1/2\u003c/sub\u003e= 16\u0026nbsp;s), two flashes (grey, t\u003csub\u003e1/2\u003c/sub\u003e= 93\u0026nbsp;s) and five flashes (red, t\u003csub\u003e1/2\u003c/sub\u003e= 69\u0026nbsp;s). Spectra were scaled to the 1184\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e marker band for protonated 13‑\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e retinal. A shift towards 1176\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e can be observed with growing number of flashes. \u003cstrong\u003eg)\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 amplitude spectra at T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e of the reaction after one flash (black, t\u003csub\u003e1/2\u003c/sub\u003e= 16\u0026nbsp;s) and 30\u0026nbsp;s of continuous illumination (red, t\u003csub\u003e1/2\u003c/sub\u003e= 68\u0026nbsp;s). Spectra were scaled to the 1184\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e marker band for protonated 13‑\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e retinal. A shift towards 1179\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e can be observed.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Picture4.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5677201/v1/2968b1333669987b3f807f95.jpg"},{"id":78698794,"identity":"838afbbc-e801-4f8d-83b2-94d72ef3c5ab","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-17 18:15:18","extension":"jpg","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":300417,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eComparison of the excitation spectra after different illumination times.\u003c/strong\u003e The respective excitation spectra after one (black), two (red) and five (blue) flashes as well as after continuous exposure to light (green) are shown (\u003cstrong\u003ed)\u003c/strong\u003e). A shift can be observed with increasing exposure from 1659\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e to 1667\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e (\u003cstrong\u003ea)\u003c/strong\u003e), from 1555\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e to 1562\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e (\u003cstrong\u003eb)\u003c/strong\u003e) and from 1184\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e to 1176\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e (\u003cstrong\u003ec)\u003c/strong\u003e). 1659\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e and 1555\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e represent the amide region of the proteins. 1184\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e‑1\u003c/sup\u003e is a marker band for protonated 13‑\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e retinal.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Picture5.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5677201/v1/de420c91f54efd91acaf5820.jpg"},{"id":78698787,"identity":"a566fad2-1722-4b4d-bb76-debb5c940205","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-17 18:15:18","extension":"jpg","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":151018,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRevised photocycle model of \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGt\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eACR1\u003c/strong\u003e. The revised photocycle model is based on previously published FTIR- and UV/Vis-spectroscopic data combined with published electrophysiological measurements and our new ambient temperature time-resolved FTIR-spectroscopic data. It explains the efficient ion conductance despite the long living late intermediates with a closed channel by the possibility to excite the O-intermediate, leading to retinal isomerization from all‑\u003cem\u003etrans\u003c/em\u003e to the 13‑\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e C=N‑\u003cem\u003eanti\u003c/em\u003e configuration. The first observable intermediate within our time resolution is L\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, therefore we cannot characterize earlier intermediates. We hypothesize, that with the transition to the 13‑\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e configuration a short‑lived K-like intermediate, which we refer to as K’, is reached before entering the known photocycle at the L\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e/L\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e’ intermediate, followed by channel opening.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Picture6.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5677201/v1/93c17d746272f2c4c84fdb4c.jpg"},{"id":78699824,"identity":"55b0aa6d-ea23-470c-aa1e-631365d8e279","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-17 18:39:20","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2497326,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5677201/v1/6402c4df-87c0-4481-b7e2-b8bea0ae4d03.pdf"},{"id":78699416,"identity":"a2b7b2a9-6fa6-46e6-bf8d-fa91ef347c5b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-17 18:31:18","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":308912,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplemental Information","description":"","filename":"ManuskriptPaperACR1finalSupportingInformation.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5677201/v1/ea60588c3bb611af3a3e6d34.docx"}],"financialInterests":"There is \u003cb\u003eNO\u003c/b\u003e Competing Interest.","formattedTitle":"A Second Photoactivatable State of the Anion-conducting channelrhodopsin GtACR1 empowers persistent activity","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe identification and characterization of natural channelrhodopsins, such as the cation-translocating channelrhodopsin 2 (\u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2) found in the chlorophyte \u003cem\u003eChlamydomonas reinhardtii\u003c/em\u003e, marked a milestone for optogenetics\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR2 CR3 CR4 CR5\" citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e a research field that utilizes genetically modified eukaryotic cells to elicit physiological effects triggered by visible or ultraviolet light\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR8\" citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Ectopically expressed \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 can control action potential firing with high temporal and spatial resolution in mammalian neurons\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Recent advances highlight the vast potential of optogenetics for various medical applications, including the treatment of blindness and Parkinson\u0026rsquo;s disease\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR13\" citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying channelrhodopsins is crucial for improving these proteins as optogenetic tools through rational design. In parallel, researchers are seeking agents with naturally higher photochemical efficiency and improved properties. For instance, anionconducting channelrhodopsins (ACRs), which belong to the same superfamily as cation-conducting channelrhodopsins namely, microbial rhodopsins but differ in their ion selectivity\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e,16\u003c/sup\u003e. Among the anionconducting channelrhodopsins, anion channelrhodopsin-1 (\u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1) from the cryptophyte \u003cem\u003eGuillardia theta\u003c/em\u003e, is so far the best characterized ACR in terms of its gating mechanism and photochemical reaction cycle\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e7\u0026ndash;19\u003c/sup\u003e. The use of heterologously expressed \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACRs\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e0,21\u003c/sup\u003e has facilitated the application of optogenetic tools for neuron suppression via anion-mediated cellular hyperpolarization\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e7, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e2,23\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBoth members of the microbial rhodopsin superfamily, \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2\u003csup\u003e24\u003c/sup\u003e and \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1\u003csup\u003e22,25\u003c/sup\u003e share the common topology of seven transmembrane α-helices (TM1TM7), with the chromophore retinal bound to a lysine side chain \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e, and a high sequence identity in the central constriction site (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;1a), representing the functional core of the protein, suggesting that they operate by similar reaction mechanisms. \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 has been extensively studied using electrophysiological and spectroscopic methods\u003csup\u003e2,3, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e. In our previous work, we investigated the physiological and biophysical mechanisms of \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 with time-resolved Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, a powerful technique for studying molecular processes and obtaining dynamic information at high spatial and temporal resolution\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e8\u003c/sup\u003e. For microbial rhodopsins, light absorption by retinal triggers a photocycle involving several spectroscopically distinguishable intermediates\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e. FTIR has been particularly effective in characterizing structural changes in the photointermediates\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e0\u003c/sup\u003e. In the case of \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2, blue light excitation (λ\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;470 nm) induces two parallel photoreaction cycles (see Supplementary Fig.\u0026nbsp;1)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e. One of these is the so called \"darkadapted\" \u003cem\u003eanti\u003c/em\u003ecycle, characterized by the exclusive occurrence of a C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;N\u003cem\u003eanti\u003c/em\u003e configuration of retinal and a well-conducting open state that decays relatively quickly. The other one is the slowly decaying \"lightadapted\" \u003cem\u003esyn\u003c/em\u003ecycle, characterised by the 13\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e, C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;N\u003cem\u003esyn\u003c/em\u003e configuration of retinal and the presence of poorly conducting photoproducts\u003csup\u003e41\u003c/sup\u003e. Electrophysiological measurements show that under continuous illumination, the highly conductive \u003cem\u003eanti\u003c/em\u003e-cycle is associated with a current peak that drops rapidly referred to as attenuation when \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 switches to the lowconductivity \u003cem\u003esyn\u003c/em\u003ecycle\u003csup\u003e33,4\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;1b). Both cycles are spectroscopically distinguishable due to their cycle-specific retinal configurations. The spectroscopic marker band of the \u003cem\u003eanti\u003c/em\u003ecycle is found at 1188 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e representing the C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;N\u003cem\u003eanti\u003c/em\u003e retinal configuration, while the marker band for the \u003cem\u003esyn\u003c/em\u003ecycle is at 1154 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, corresponding to the C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;N\u003cem\u003esyn\u003c/em\u003e retinal configuration \u003csup\u003e41\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn contrast to \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2, only a highly conductive photocycle actively operates in \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1\u003csup\u003e19,33\u003c/sup\u003e. The photocycle model by Sineshchekov et al.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, based on electrophysiological data, was significantly improved by Dreier et al.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e using FTIR-spectroscopic measurements (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;2). After photoexcitation (λ\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;480\u0026ndash;500 nm) of the ground state, retinal in \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 isomerizes from its all\u003cem\u003etrans\u003c/em\u003e configuration to the 13\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;N\u003cem\u003eanti\u003c/em\u003e configuration, initiating the K intermediate. Within 450 ns, K decays to the non-conducting L\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e/L\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e' intermediate. As L\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e/L\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e' decays, channel opening occurs in a two-step process with fast (18 \u0026micro;s) and slow (1.9 ms) phases, leading to the conducting L\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e intermediate. Channel closing also occurs in two steps, with the mechanistic closing happening in the transition from L\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e to M (35 ms). The photocurrent shuts down completely upon formation of the N/O intermediate, following the M intermediate, with a half-life of 107 ms. Finally, \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 relaxes from the N/O intermediate a fast equilibrium that is difficult to dissect spectroscopically back to the ground state with a lifetime of 4.4 s \u003csup\u003e33\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere is no spectroscopic evidence for a \u003cem\u003esyn\u003c/em\u003ecycle, as its typical marker band at 1154 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e is absent in the \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 WT\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e. This is also reflected in the electrophysiological measurements, where photocurrent amplitudes are much higher than those observed in \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2, without significant current attenuation\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e5, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e8, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e. High photocurrents and low current inactivation levels in channelrhodopsins are highly desirable for optogenetic applications, as both features enable efficient, targeted stimulation of neurons. A fundamental prerequisite for the rational design of optimized optogenetic tools is a detailed functional understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying channel opening and closing at the atomic level.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTherefore, we investigated the mechanistic role of the central gate, which is crucial for ion conductivity in channelrhodopsins\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, by comparing the relatively ineffective \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 to the highly effective \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1. To gain insights into the limiting characteristics of \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2, we performed mutagenesis on \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 to convert it to a more \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2like variant. In doing so, we unexpectedly discovered a second photoactivatable state in addition to the \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 ground state, which allows fast and efficient channel reopening. This second photoactivatable state explains the sustained high conductivity observed in electrophysiological studies under continuous illumination.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results and Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eGt\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eACR1 Variant Q46E\u003c/span\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo gain insights into the functional differences between \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 and \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1, we compared the existing X-ray structures\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e of the central constriction sites, which represent the functional cores of both proteins, as shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;1a. \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 and \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 exhibit high sequence identity in the central gate, with residues such as S63, E90, D253 and N258 in \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 being conservatively substituted by S43, E68, D234 and N239 in \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1. Especially E90 in \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 and E68 in \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 are critical for the function of both proteins. E90 in \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 is one of the key determinants of ion selectivity, and its deprotonation is linked to ion conductance after light adaptation\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR44 CR45 CR46\" citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. In \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1, early deprotonation of E68 has been shown to be crucial for gate formation\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. However, there are notable differences within the central constriction sites of \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 and \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1. For example, L66, V94, and F226 in \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 are replaced by Q46, Y72, and Y207 in \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1, making these latter residues promising targets for investigating the limiting characteristics of \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAmong the residues of the central constriction site that are potential candidates responsible for attenuation, we focused on the most promising \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 variant, Q46E, which exhibits electrophysiological features comparable to the wild type of \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2\u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003e (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;1b). Under continuous illumination, the variant displays a sharp current peak followed by current attenuation, which similar to \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2\u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003e might be due to the occurrence of a low conducting \u003cem\u003esyn\u003c/em\u003ecycle in this variant. To test this hypothesis, rapid-scan FTIR measurements were carried out at ambient temperature and compared to wild type measurements.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe major difference between the WT and the variant lies in the reaction rates, expressed in the halflives derived from global fit analysis, as the \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 variant Q46E is significantly slower than the wild type. In this case, only the halflives T\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003eT\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e were spectroscopically distinguished, as rapidscan measurements were performed and T\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003eT\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e fall outside the time-resolution limit. As summarized in Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;1, the variant's half-life T\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e is about five times slower than the WT, T\u003csub\u003e5\u003c/sub\u003e is about seven times slower, and T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e is about twice as slow as the WT.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInterestingly, the course of the key marker bands identified so far (see Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;2 for a list of marker bands) of \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 WT and its variant Q46E remain similar (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;3a/b). The conformational changes during channel opening and closing in the amide I region, visible at 1644 cm\u003csup\u003e-\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, as well as channel opening itself and the conducting state, visible at 1691 cm\u003csup\u003e-\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, follow the same pattern as described in literature for the wild type\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Furthermore, the protonated 13\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e retinal (1184 cm\u003csup\u003e-\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e) and the retinal C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;C vibrations in the ground state (1529 cm\u003csup\u003e-\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e) could be readily followed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverall, the entire mid-IR amplitude spectra from 1000\u0026ndash;1800 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e for \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 WT and \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 Q46E are almost identical (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;3c), indicating nearly indistinguishable photocycle processes for both proteins. The only notable difference is a shift in the marker band of the protonated Schiff base in 13\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e configuration, which is shifted from 1184 to 1180 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e in the T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e FTIR amplitude spectra. This shift could be explained by the altered electrostatic environment resulting from the change from glutamine to glutamate in the central constriction site.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMost importantly, in both the WT and the Q46E variant of \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1, the band at 1154 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, which is typical for a 13\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;N \u003cem\u003esyn\u003c/em\u003econfiguration in \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2, is absent (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;3c). This clearly contradicts our initial assumption that a \u003cem\u003esyn\u003c/em\u003ecycle is responsible for the attenuated current in Q46E. The observed reduction in photocurrents in the Q46E variant must therefore be due to another cause. The extensive similarity between the UV/Vis and FTIR spectra suggests that \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 WT and Q46E exhibit similar reaction mechanisms, except for the significantly decelerated photocyclic reaction rates in the variant. Since a \u003cem\u003esyn\u003c/em\u003ecycle is ruled out, and the conductive state of the channel is relatively short (even the slow channel-closing lifetime is about 290 ms), compared to the long return time to the excitable ground state, due to the increased T\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026ndash;T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e half-lives, we conclude that the electrophysiologically observed attenuation is due to the accumulation of intermediates preceding the photoactivatable ground state.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGiven the above explanation, it is questionable why attenuation is almost absent in \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 WT upon continuous illumination (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;3). The channel closes completely with a halflife of only 107 ms, compared to the long half-life of T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;4.4 s for the return to the ground state. This should immediately enrich the nonconducting N/O intermediate, leading inevitably to conductive attenuation. However, as no attenuation occurs in WT \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1, we hypothesize that continuous photocycling is driven by the N/O intermediate, specifically through photoactivation of the O intermediate, whose retinal cofactor is already in the all\u003cem\u003etrans\u003c/em\u003e configuration. This is a precondition that is otherwise only satisfied by the dark ground state.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eRepeated Photoexcitability of the Relaxing State\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo validate our new theory on the photocycle model and the potential initiation of another photocycle from the N/O intermediate more specifically, from the O intermediate we conducted additional investigations on the \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 WT. These experiments provided more insights into the gating mechanism of \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 WT, as detailed below.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo test whether the hypothesis of additional excitability of the O intermediate applies to the \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 WT, the proper timing for repeated excitation must be adjusted to ensure that the O intermediate is precisely targeted. Based on the known photocycle time constants, it was calculated that 1 second after the initial activation from the ground state, the M intermediate (which decays with a slow channelclosing halflife T\u003csub\u003e5\u003c/sub\u003e of 107 ms) is reduced to less than1 % of its initial value (see Supplementary Note 1), indicating that over 9 % of the protein has transitioned to the N/O intermediate. Similarly, it was calculated that the \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 ground state is populated with only a negligible4 % after 1 second of activation, with 6 % of the proteins remaining in the N/O intermediate (see Supplementary Note 2). At this time point, a second flash was applied to initiate another photocycle, which was monitored by time-resolved FTIR spectroscopy. A comparison of the excitation spectra shows that efficient photoexcitation indeed occurred, with approximately 5 % of the sample being reexcited.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlobal fit analysis of the FTIR data obtained after the second laser flash revealed three distinct reaction steps. The amplitude spectra for these steps are similar to the last three partial reactions (T\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026ndash;T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e) of the normal photocycle (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;4a)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The halflives of the reactions after the first and second flashes are comparable for T\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e, but significantly slower for T\u003csub\u003e5\u003c/sub\u003e and T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e following the second flash (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;4b/c and Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe amplitude spectra of the partial reactions after the first and second laser flashes show largely identical absorption bands (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;4a), suggesting that the secondary triggered photocycle is very similar to the first and that rapid channel opening occurs. The most prominent differences between the spectra from single and repeated exposure are observed in the amide I and amide II regions (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;4a). Specifically, in T\u003csub\u003e5\u003c/sub\u003e, shifts are observed from 1645 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e to 1635 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e and from 1659 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e to 1667 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, indicating conformational changes in the protein backbone, and from 1555 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e to 1562 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, indicating changes in the surrounding of the retinal. The most striking difference in the T\u003csub\u003e5\u003c/sub\u003e amplitude spectra is the band of protonated E68 at 1708 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e. Although still visible, this band is largely reduced after the second flash. For T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e, shifts from 1640 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e to 1652 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e and from 1184 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e to 1180 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e occur (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;4a/f). The changes around 1640 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e are also associated with conformational changes in the protein backbone, while the shift of the 1184 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e band suggests alterations in the environment of protonated retinal in the 13\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;N \u003cem\u003eanti\u003c/em\u003eSBH⁺ configuration. The 1691 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e band, which is attributed to conformational changes during pore formation, shows an increase in absorption with repeated excitation (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;4d).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo determine whether the observed changes are intensified with increased exposure to activating light, spectral development was monitored under different illumination regimes: after one flash, two flashes, and five flashes (with 1 Hz repetition rate; see Fig.\u0026nbsp;4d/e), as well as after 30 s of continuous illumination (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;4f/g). Illumination after two and five flashes, as well as after 30 seconds, resulted in comparable halflives of the reactions, although T\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e and T\u003csub\u003e5\u003c/sub\u003e were slightly slower under continuous illumination (see Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the amplitude spectra, the most prominent shift was observed at 1184 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e in the T\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003e amplitude spectrum (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;4f/g), which shifted down to 1178 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e after the excitation with five flashes, while continuous illumination produced a shift to 1179 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e. Furthermore, it was observed that the amplitude assigned to the E68 band at 1708 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e decreased further with increasing exposure time, while the band at 1691 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e became more pronounced. (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;4d/e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn summary, the effects of repeated flash excitation or continuous illumination indicate various changes within the functionally active region, specifically the central gate of \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe decrease in the E68 band at 1708 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;4f/g) demonstrates a lower degree of reprotonation with increased light exposure. Since the fast deprotonation of E68 is associated with the channel opening process\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, the deprotonated state of glutamate may facilitate opening more readily than the state reached after full deprotonation and reprotonation, as observed after a single flash activation. The central constriction site may therefore exist in a \u0026ldquo;preopen state,\u0026rdquo; which allows for rapid channel opening upon excitation from the O intermediate.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis interpretation is further supported by the increased formation of the band at 1691 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e during stronger light exposure (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;4f/g), which reflects alterations in the secondary structure during channel opening and clearly supports the buildup of the postulated preopen state of the ion channel. The environmental changes may also affect the neighboring protonated Schiff base, which explains the observed shift of the band of protonated 13\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;N\u003cem\u003eanti\u003c/em\u003e retinal at 1184 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;4d/e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eChannel state after photoexcitation of the O intermediate\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA major question is whether the state of the ion channel is altered when the protein is excited from the ground state or from the O intermediate. Photoexcitation spectra, i.e., FTIR difference spectra directly recorded after flash activation, provide insight into such alterations. A comparison of the excitation spectra of \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 WT after one, two, and five flashes, as well as with continuous exposure, reveals changes in the positive bands (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;5d). The positive bands in these spectra provide information about the reached intermediate, while the negative bands reflect changes in the ground state or the O intermediate respectively.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWith increasing light exposure, band shifts are observed from 1659 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e to 1667 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;5a), from 1555 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e to 1562 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;5b), and from 1184 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e to 1176 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;5c). As previously described, the bands at 1659 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e and 1555 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e indicate changes in the backbone of the protein and surrounding the retinal. The 1184 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e band is a marker for the protonated 13\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e configuration of the retinal. Regarding the negative bands, a shift from 1645 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e to 1650 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e is observed. These shifts suggest that \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 enters a related photocycle upon excitation of the O intermediate compared to the ground state, as the positive bands exhibit only minor changes. The bands most affected are those that provide information about the global structure of the protein, particularly those in the amide I and II regions. However, it is important to note that the increased band shifting observed under repeated exposure in the amplitude spectra is also present in the excitation spectra.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOf particular importance is the following observation, illustrated in Fig.\u0026nbsp;5a: The negative band at 1708 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, which represents the deprotonation of E68, diminishes under increased illumination conditions, consistent with the lack of reprotonation observed in the amplitude spectra of the corresponding photocycle. This indicates that E68 remains deprotonated throughout these conditions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe band at 1691 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e is associated with conformational changes during pore formation. The decrease in this band under strong illumination, where efficient ion current is observed, suggests that the pore is not fully closed and therefore does not need to open at the beginning of the photocycle. These two band changes are fully consistent with the previously described amplitude spectra, supporting the idea that E68 remains deprotonated under repeated excitation and that secondary structural changes occur during pore formation. Other retinal-related bands, such as 1184 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e (assigned to the C-C bond) and 1555 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e (assigned to the C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;C bond), show slight shifts, indicating changes in the environment of the retinal.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese findings further support our hypothesis that the changes induced by the deprotonation of E68, which contribute to pore formation in \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1, are pre-formed upon repeated excitation. This strengthens our postulate of a 'pre-opened' state in \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1, which, under continuous illumination, stabilizes and facilitates rapid channel opening. This process significantly contributes to the effectiveness of \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1, and helps explain the consistently high photocurrents observed in electrophysiological experiments\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe findings also apply to the \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 variant Q46E. The high attenuation of the photocurrent observed in this variant, compared to the WT, can be attributed to the prolonged presence of the L\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e and M intermediates. During these states, the pore is in a non-conductive state, and since the retinal remains in the 13\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e configuration, no new excitation can occur. Once the O intermediate is reached, a photocycle is also initiated in the Q46E variant (see Supplementary Fig.\u0026nbsp;2).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eExtended photocycle model\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOur data allows us to expand the photochemical model of \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;6), as explained in detail below. According to our current view, the initial stages of the photocycle, as outlined in the introduction, remain unchanged. Photoexcitation (λ\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;480\u0026ndash;500 nm) of the ground state ACR1 leads to retinal isomerization, initiating the K intermediate, followed by the non-conducting L\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e/L\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026rsquo; intermediate and the conducting L\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e intermediate. Subsequently, channel closing occurs in two steps: from L\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e to M and from M to N/O. In the previous version of the cycle, \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 relaxes into the ground state from the N/O intermediate with a halflife of 4.4 s, a process that still occurs without further photoexcitation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHowever, photoactivation of the O intermediate, which contains all\u003cem\u003etrans\u003c/em\u003e retinal and the pore in a \u0026ldquo;preopen\u0026rdquo; state, generates a shortened photocycle. The first observable intermediate within our time resolution is L\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, therefore we cannot characterize earlier intermediates. We hypothesize, that with the transition to the 13\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e configuration a shortlived K-like intermediate, which we refer to as K\u0026rsquo;, is reached before entering the known photocycle at the L\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e/L\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026rsquo; intermediate, followed by channel opening.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe identification of the O intermediate as a photoactivatable state provides the opportunity to reconcile the apparently conflicting data from optical and FTIR spectroscopy using a flash activation setup, as well as electrophysiological measurements based on continuous illumination (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;2b). \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 enters a highly conductive photocycle upon initial excitation, which is reflected in a high current deflection. Following excitation of the shortened cycle from the O intermediate by continuous exposure, the photocurrent remains elevated. The small current loss of \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 observed in Fig.\u0026nbsp;2b can be explained by the retention time of the channel in non-conductive intermediates, such as the M or the N intermediate, as only the O intermediate is excitable.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis insights offer a new perspective on the previously published data by Szundi et al.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, proposing a parallel photocycle kinetic model and a red-absorbing intermediate as open channel state. Furthermore, new approaches for improving \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 for optogenetic applications, aiming to increase the channel's conductivity, can be found based on these findings.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eDuring our investigations of the \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 variant Q46E, in an effort to gain further insights into the strong attenuation effect associated with the \u003cem\u003esyn\u003c/em\u003ephotocycle, we observed the absence of the typical marker band for 13\u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e retinal in \u003cem\u003esyn\u003c/em\u003econfiguration, as well as significantly retarded partial reaction rates, leading to an enrichment of non-conducting intermediates.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis raised the question of the wild-type kinetic behavior, prompting us to investigate distinct illumination schemes. We found that with the arrival of the all\u003cem\u003etrans\u003c/em\u003e configuration of retinal at the O intermediate, another round of the photocycle can be triggered by flash irradiation. Amplitude spectra derived from global fit analysis, along with photoexcitation spectra, showed a high degree of resemblance between the O intermediate-generated and the ground-state-generated courses, suggesting that their functional behavior is closely related.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSubtle alterations in the evolution of secondary structural changes and protonation events within the central constriction site of the channel such as changes in the protonation of E68 or signs of pore formation led us to propose a so-called \u0026ldquo;preopen\u0026rdquo; state, which facilitates easier channel opening.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur investigations of \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 have revealed that the high efficiency of the channel is due to the second photoactivatable state, which allows the photocycle to be reexcited from the O intermediate and is associated with the formation of a \u0026ldquo;preopen\u0026rdquo; state.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis finding offers new approaches for improving \u003cem\u003eCr\u003c/em\u003eChR2 for optogenetic applications, aiming to increase the channel's conductivity.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eBiochemical methods\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSite specfic mutagenesis and preparation of mutant DNA\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIf not indicated otherwise, all molecular biological work was carried out as described in Dreier et al.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. To obtain the Q46E variant we used the site-specific mutagenesis Quik-change protocol using the template plasmid pPIC9k-ACR1-His10 and the oligonucleotide primers GTTGTTTCTGCTTGT\u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eGAA\u003c/span\u003eGTTTTCTTTATGG and CCATAAAGAAAACTTCAC\u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eAAG\u003c/span\u003eCAGAAACAAC.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eTransformation of Pichia pastoris, mutant selection and ACR1 expression\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003ePichia pastoris\u003c/em\u003e strain SMD 1168 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA) is streaked onto a YPD agar plate and incubated for 72 h at 30\u0026deg;C. Subsequently, 10 ml of YPD medium is inoculated with a single colony from the YPD plate and shaken overnight at 30\u0026deg;C and 150 rpm. The next day 50 ml of YPD medium are inoculated with the 10 mL culture to an OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e of 0.2 and shaken at 30\u0026deg;C and 150 rpm until an OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e of 1-1.6 is reached. After centrifugation at 1500 g and 4\u0026deg;C for 5 min the resulting sediment is resuspended in 50 ml sterile ice-cold water and centrifuged again under the same conditions. The sediment is resuspended in 25 ml sterile ice-cold water followed by another centrifugation at the same settings. Finally, the sediment is resuspended in 2 ml of 1 M sterile ice-cold sorbitol and centrifuged again as previously described. After removal of the supernatant, the cells are taken up in 100 \u0026micro;l sterile ice-cold sorbitol. Subsequently, 12 \u0026micro;g of PmeI linearized DNA is added to 80 \u0026micro;l of the cells, incubated on ice for 5 min and transferred using electroporation at 1.5 kV, 25 \u0026micro;F and 200 Ω. Immediately afterwards, 1 ml of ice-cold 1 M sorbitol is added to the mixture, which is then shaken for 60 min at 30\u0026deg;C and 450 rpm. The transformed cells, now containing expression vectors with HIS4 genes, are streaked out on a MD plate and incubated at 30\u0026deg;C for 72 h to select for the uptake of the plasmid. Colonies were picked and transferred to plates containing the selectant Geneticin at increasing concentrations (0.25 mg/ml, 0.5 mg/ml, 0.75 mg/ml and 1 mg/ml) and incubated at 30\u0026deg;C for one week to check for the number of copies. Thereafter, 6 precultures are prepared by inoculation of from 50 mL BMGY, with a colony which survived the highest geneticin concentration, and shaken at 30\u0026deg;C and 170 rpm. By use of PCR from precultures positive clones carrying the desired gene fragment are verified and used to inoculate 1 l of BMGY medium\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The culture is shaken at 30\u0026deg;C and 100 rpm overnight. To prepare the main culture, 6x 1 litre of BMGY medium is inoculated with the preculture to a starting OD\u003csub\u003e600\u003c/sub\u003e of 1. In addition, 10 \u0026micro;l all-\u003cem\u003etrans\u003c/em\u003e retinal in 10 ml 100 %methanol is added to each flask\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The cultures are shaken at 30\u0026deg;C and 90 rpm. After 6 h, 5 \u0026micro;l all-\u003cem\u003etrans\u003c/em\u003e retinal is added to 5 ml 100 % methnol. After 24 h, 10 \u0026micro;l all-\u003cem\u003etrans\u003c/em\u003e retinal in 10 ml 100 % methnol is added again as at the beginning and after 48 h 5 \u0026micro;l all-\u003cem\u003etrans\u003c/em\u003e retinal in 5 ml 100 % methnol is added. After shaking another 6 h, the cultures are harvested for 15 minutes at 5000 rpm and 15\u0026deg;C in an Avanti centrifuge. The sediments are resuspended in 20 ml lysis buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7,5, 5 % glycrol, 1 mM EDTA, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF) and stored at -20\u0026deg;C.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMembrane preparation and protein purification\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eCells were disrupted by 15 cycles at 1500 bar using a microfluidizer M-110L (Microfluidics Corp., Newton, MA) and lysis buffer. Non-disrupted cells and large debris are removed by centrifugation for 15 min at 5000 rpm and 4\u0026deg;C. The membrane containing supernatant is sedimented by ultracentrifugation for 1 h 15 min at 45000 rpm and 4\u0026deg;C. The obtained membrane components are homogenised in a 9-fold amount of solubilisation buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF, 1% (w/v) n-Dodecyl-beta-maltosid) and solubilised overnight at 4\u0026deg;C under stirring in the dark or under red light. After addition of 50 mM imidazole another ultracentrifugation (1 h 15 min at 45000 rpm and 4\u0026deg;C) is performed to remove unsolubilized membranes and the supernatant is used for affinity chromatography. \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 purification was performed by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography using a HisTrap\u0026trade; \u003cem\u003eFast Flow\u003c/em\u003e 5 ml column (Cytiva, Dassel, Germany) and a step gradient elution (buffer A: 20 mM Hepes, 100 mM NaCl, 0,15% DM, pH 7.5; buffer B: 20 mM Hepes, 100 mM NaCl, 0,15% DM, 500 mM imidazol, pH 7.5). Coloured fractions are pooled and loaded on a gel filtration column using a HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 200 pg (GE Healthcare, D\u0026uuml;sseldorf, Germany), and eluted with buffer A, yielding purified \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1, which is characterized by SDS-Page and Western blotting.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eReconstitution of GtACR1 using egg phosphatidylcholine and preparation of samples for FTIR spectroscopys\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo simulate conditions of a natural lipid environment\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e55\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e in spectroscopic measurements, purified \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 are reconstituted into egg phosphatidylcholine (Avanti Polar Lipids, AL). The lipids are solubilized with 0.15 %n-Dodecyl-beta-maltosid in 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl by incubation at 50\u0026deg;C for 10 min. Solubilized lipids and purified \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 are mixed at a 2:1 ratio (w/w, lipid to protein) and incubated for 30 min. The detergent is removed overnight by adsorption on Bio-Beads SM 2 (BioRad, CA) using 40:1 (w/w, Bio-Beads to detergent) at room temperature. The following day this procedure of detergent removal is repeated for 4 h. The resulting suspension containing proteoliposomes and buffer is further processed by separating the proteoliposome suspension from the beads and ultracentrifugation at 55.000 rpm for 3 h using a Thermo Scientific MTX150 micro-ultracentrifuge with a S55-A2 rotor. To assemble the sample, two CaF\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e windows (\u0026Oslash; 2 cm, 2 mm thickness, one of them with a 10 \u0026micro;m deepened area 1 cm in diameter) were cleaned with detergent, isopropyl alcohol and de-ionized water. The edge of one window was greased with a thin layer of silicon grease to seal the sample. The pelleted protein/phospholipid sample containing either wildtype or mutant full-length \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 is applied to the deepened window and covered by the second window to obtain an optical path length between 5 and 10 \u0026micro;m. The double window stack containing samples are sealed, placed to a metal cuvette and mounted to the FTIR spectrometer (Bruker Vertex 80v, Bruker Corporation, MA, USA) at 21\u0026deg;C. Samples were equilibrated overnight.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSpectroscopic methods\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eFTIR-experiments\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTime-resolved FTIR difference spectroscopy was performed to gain insight in the changes upon illumination. After sample equilibration, background spectra were taken (400 scans) and the samples were illuminated with a short laser pulse of a Minilite Nd:YAG laser (Continuum, Pessac, France, λ\u003csub\u003emax\u003c/sub\u003e: 532 nm, 6 ns pulse) in case of single- and multi-flash measurements. For continuous illumination measurements green LED lights were used (λ\u003csub\u003emax\u003c/sub\u003e: 525 nm). Measurements were performed in the rapid-scan mode of a Vertex 80 v spectrometer and OPUS 7.2 software (Bruker Corporation), an Adwin Pro II A/D converter and ADbasic 6 software (J\u0026auml;ger Computergesteuerte Messtechnik GmbH), and a Lecroy WaveRunner HRO64zi oscilloscope with WaveRunner 6 Zi Oscilloscope Firmware version 6.6.0.5 (Teledyne LeCroy) and MatLab R2015a (The MathWorks, Inc.). Data between 1900 and 1000 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e were collected with a spectral resolution of 4 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e in the double-sided forward-backward data acquisition mode with a scanner speed of 120 kHz. For the Fourier-transformation, a zerofilling factor of 4 and Norton-Beer weak apodization was applied.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eGlobal fit analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhen it comes to the analysis of the time-resolved data a global fit\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e in MatLab (The MathWorks, MA, USA) and in OPUS (Bruker Corporation) was used. The time-resolved absorbance change ΔA (ν, t) of \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 measurements is described by the absorbance change induced by photoactivation \u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e0\u003c/sub\u003e(ν) followed by three exponential functions fitting the amplitudes \u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e for each wavenumber ν (Eq.\u0026nbsp;(1)).\u003cdiv id=\"Equa\" class=\"Equation\"\u003e\u003cdiv format=\"TEX\" class=\"mathdisplay\" id=\"FileID_Equa\" name=\"EquationSource\"\u003e\n$$\\:\\varDelta\\:A\\left(\\nu\\:,\\:t\\right)=\\:{a}_{0}\\left(\\nu\\:\\right)+\\:{a}_{1}\\left(\\nu\\:\\right)\\left(1-{e}^{-{k}_{1}t}\\right)+{a}_{2}\\left(\\nu\\:\\right)\\left(1-{e}^{-{k}_{2}t}\\right)+{a}_{3}\\left(\\nu\\:\\right)\\left(1-{e}^{-{k}_{3}t}\\right)$$\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDreier et al. identified \u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e(ν, t) as the transition from L\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e to M, \u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e(ν, t) as transition from M to N/O and \u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e(ν, t) as transition from N/O to the ground state ACR1\u003csup\u003e33\u003c/sup\u003e. In the figures disappearing bands face upward and appearing bands face downward. Rapid-Scan spectra were obtained from a total of 48 measurements from three protein samples per measurement condition.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistics and reproducibility\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eRapid-scan spectra were obtained from a total of 48 measurements from three protein samples per measurement condition. The number of repetitions was adjusted according to data quality. IR-Measurements with large baseline drifts were excluded.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e "},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eData availability\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe raw data of the spectroscopic measurements as well as the simulation trajectories and input files will be provided upon individual request by the corresponding authors.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003ch2\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAuthor contributions\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eK.G. obtained the funding; K.G., M.L., T.R. and C.K. designed the research; K.L., M.J.N., L-M.H., and P.A performed the research; K.L. performed FTIR measurements with the help of M.J.N. and L-M.H. supervised by K.G., T.R., and C.K.; K.L. and L-M.H performed biochemistry supervised by M.L.; all authors analyzed the data; K.L., K.G., M.L., T.R., and C.K. wrote the paper with edits from all co-authors.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe thank Elena Govorunova for providing the raw electrophysiological data for Fig.\u0026nbsp;1 a. We thank Max-Aylmer Dreier for all the support and helpful discussions as well as Simon V\u0026ouml;lker and Olga Zapolskaia, who contributed to the project during their respective thesis. We acknowledge Harald Chorongiewski for his technical support with the spectroscopic setup and Gabriele Smuda for molecular biology support.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) Individual Research Grant, \u0026ldquo;Molecular mechanisms of cation and anion-conducting channelrhodopsins\u0026rdquo; (GE 599/23\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1) to K.G. and the DFG Priority Program SPP1926 (GE 599/19\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2 and GE 599/19\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1) to K.G. Further support was provided by the Ministry for Culture and Science (MKW) of North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) through grant 111.08.03.05- 133974 to K.G. and the Protein Research Unit Ruhr within Europe (PURE) funded by the Ministry of Innovation, Science and Research (MIWF) of North-Rhine Westphalia (Germany) to K.G.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSineshchekov, O.A., Jung, K.-H., Spudich, J.L.: Two rhodopsins mediate phototaxis to low- and high-intensity light in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. \u003cb\u003e99\u003c/b\u003e(13), 8689\u0026ndash;8694 (2002). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1073/pnas.122243399\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1073/pnas.122243399\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNagel, G., Ollig, D., Fuhrmann, M., et al.: Channelrhodopsin-1: a light-gated proton channel in green algae. Science. \u003cb\u003e296\u003c/b\u003e(5577), 2395\u0026ndash;2398 (2002). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1126/science.1072068\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1126/science.1072068\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNagel, G., Szellas, T., Huhn, W., et al.: Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. \u003cb\u003e100\u003c/b\u003e(24), 13940\u0026ndash;13945 (2003). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1073/pnas.1936192100\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1073/pnas.1936192100\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSuzuki, T., Yamasaki, K., Fujita, S., et al.: Archaeal-type rhodopsins in Chlamydomonas: model structure and intracellular localization. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. \u003cb\u003e301\u003c/b\u003e(3), 711\u0026ndash;717 (2003). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/S0006-291X(02)03079-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/S0006-291X(02)03079-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBregestovski, P., Mukhtarov, M.: Optogenetics: Perspectives in Biomedical Research (Review). Sovrem Tehnol Med. \u003cb\u003e8\u003c/b\u003e(4), 212\u0026ndash;221 (2016). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.17691/stm2016.8.4.26\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.17691/stm2016.8.4.26\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDeisseroth, K., Optogenetics: Nat. Methods. \u003cb\u003e8\u003c/b\u003e(1), 26\u0026ndash;29 (2011). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/nmeth.f.324\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/nmeth.f.324\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGovorunova, E.G., Sineshchekov, O.A., Li, H., Spudich, J.L.: Microbial Rhodopsins: Diversity, Mechanisms, and Optogenetic Applications. Annu. Rev. Biochem. \u003cb\u003e86\u003c/b\u003e, 845\u0026ndash;872 (2017). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1146/annurev-biochem-101910-144233\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1146/annurev-biochem-101910-144233\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim, C.K., Adhikari, A., Deisseroth, K.: Integration of optogenetics with complementary methodologies in systems neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. \u003cb\u003e18\u003c/b\u003e(4), 222\u0026ndash;235 (2017). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/nrn.2017.15\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/nrn.2017.15\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBoyden, E.S., Zhang, F., Bamberg, E., Nagel, G., Deisseroth, K.: Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity. Nat. Neurosci. \u003cb\u003e8\u003c/b\u003e(9), 1263\u0026ndash;1268 (2005). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/nn1525\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/nn1525\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKojima, K., Watanabe, H.C., Doi, S., et al.: Mutational analysis of the conserved carboxylates of anion channelrhodopsin-2 (ACR2) expressed in Escherichia coli and their roles in anion transport. Biophys. Physicobiol. \u003cb\u003e15\u003c/b\u003e, 179\u0026ndash;188 (2018). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.2142/biophysico.15.0_179\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2142/biophysico.15.0_179\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKuleshova, E.P.: Optogenetics \u0026ndash; New Potentials for Electrophysiology. Neurosci. Behav. Physi. \u003cb\u003e49\u003c/b\u003e(2), 169\u0026ndash;177 (2019). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s11055-019-00711-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11055-019-00711-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBerry, M.H., Holt, A., Salari, A., et al.: Restoration of high-sensitivity and adapting vision with a cone opsin. Nat. Commun. \u003cb\u003e10\u003c/b\u003e(1), 1221 (2019). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s41467-019-09124-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41467-019-09124-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKravitz, A.V., Freeze, B.S., Parker, P.R.L., et al.: Regulation of parkinsonian motor behaviours by optogenetic control of basal ganglia circuitry. Nature. \u003cb\u003e466\u003c/b\u003e(7306), 622\u0026ndash;626 (2010). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/nature09159\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/nature09159\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZenchak, J.R., Palmateer, B., Dorka, N., et al.: Bioluminescence-driven optogenetic activation of transplanted neural precursor cells improves motor deficits in a Parkinson's disease mouse model. J. Neurosci. Res. \u003cb\u003e98\u003c/b\u003e(3), 458\u0026ndash;468 (2020). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1002/jnr.24237\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/jnr.24237\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGovorunova, E.G., Sineshchekov, O.A., Janz, R., Liu, X., Spudich, J.L.: NEUROSCIENCE. Natural light-gated anion channels: A family of microbial rhodopsins for advanced optogenetics. Science. \u003cb\u003e349\u003c/b\u003e(6248), 647\u0026ndash;650 (2015). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1126/science.aaa7484\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1126/science.aaa7484\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGovorunova, E.G., Sineshchekov, О.А., Spudich, J.L.: Three Families of Channelrhodopsins and Their Use in Optogenetics (review). Neurosci. Behav. Physi. \u003cb\u003e49\u003c/b\u003e(2), 163\u0026ndash;168 (2019). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s11055-019-00710-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11055-019-00710-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi, H., Huang, C.-Y., Elena, G., Govorunova, C.T., Schafer, O.A., Sineshchekov, M., Wang, L., Zheng: John L Spudich. Crystal structure of a natural light-gated anion channelrhodopsin. eLife Updated January \u003cb\u003e7\u003c/b\u003e, (2019)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSineshchekov, O.A., Govorunova, E.G., Li, H., Spudich, J.L.: Gating mechanisms of a natural anion channelrhodopsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. \u003cb\u003e112\u003c/b\u003e(46), 14236\u0026ndash;14241 (2015). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1073/pnas.1513602112\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1073/pnas.1513602112\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSineshchekov, O.A., Li, H., Govorunova, E.G., Spudich, J.L.: Photochemical reaction cycle transitions during anion channelrhodopsin gating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. \u003cb\u003e113\u003c/b\u003e(14), E1993\u0026ndash;2000 (2016). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1073/pnas.1525269113\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1073/pnas.1525269113\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGovorunova, E.G., Sineshchekov, O.A., Rodarte, E.M., et al.: The Expanding Family of Natural Anion Channelrhodopsins Reveals Large Variations in Kinetics, Conductance, and Spectral Sensitivity. Sci. Rep. \u003cb\u003e7\u003c/b\u003e, 43358 (2017). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/srep43358\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/srep43358\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGovorunova, E.G., Sineshchekov, O.A., Hemmati, R., et al.: Extending the Time Domain of Neuronal Silencing with Cryptophyte Anion Channelrhodopsins. eNeuro. \u003cb\u003e5\u003c/b\u003e(3) (2018). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1523/ENEURO.0174-18.2018\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1523/ENEURO.0174-18.2018\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim, Y.S., Kato, H.E., Yamashita, K., et al.: Crystal structure of the natural anion-conducting channelrhodopsin GtACR1. Nature. \u003cb\u003e561\u003c/b\u003e(7723), 343\u0026ndash;348 (2018). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s41586-018-0511-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41586-018-0511-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAcharya, A.R., Vandekerckhove, B., Larsen, L.E., et al.: In vivoblue light illumination for optogenetic inhibition: effect on local temperature and excitability of the rat hippocampus. J. Neural Eng. \u003cb\u003e18\u003c/b\u003e(6) (2021). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1088/1741-2552/ac3ef4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1088/1741-2552/ac3ef4\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVolkov, O., Kovalev, K., Polovinkin, V., et al.: Structural insights into ion conduction by channelrhodopsin 2. Science. \u003cb\u003e358\u003c/b\u003e(6366) (2017). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1126/science.aan8862\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1126/science.aan8862\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi, H., Huang, C.-Y., Govorunova, E.G., et al.: Crystal structure of a natural light-gated anion channelrhodopsin. Elife. \u003cb\u003e8\u003c/b\u003e (2019). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.7554/eLife.41741\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.7554/eLife.41741\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSpudich, J.L., Sineshchekov, O.A., Govorunova, E.G.: Mechanism divergence in microbial rhodopsins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. \u003cb\u003e1837\u003c/b\u003e(5), 546\u0026ndash;552 (2014). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.06.006\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.06.006\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eErnst, O.P., Lodowski, D.T., Elstner, M., Hegemann, P., Brown, L.S., Kandori, H.: Microbial and animal rhodopsins: structures, functions, and molecular mechanisms. Chem. Rev. \u003cb\u003e114\u003c/b\u003e(1), 126\u0026ndash;163 (2014). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1021/cr4003769\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1021/cr4003769\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKandori, H.: Biophysics of rhodopsins and optogenetics. Biophys. Rev. \u003cb\u003e12\u003c/b\u003e(2), 355\u0026ndash;361 (2020). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s12551-020-00645-0\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s12551-020-00645-0\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGovorunova, E.G., Sineshchekov, O.A., Spudich, J.L.: Emerging Diversity of Channelrhodopsins and Their Structure-Function Relationships. Front. Cell. Neurosci. \u003cb\u003e15\u003c/b\u003e, 800313 (2021). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fncel.2021.800313\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fncel.2021.800313\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGerwert, K.: Channelrhodopsin reveals its dark secrets. Science. \u003cb\u003e358\u003c/b\u003e(6366), 1000\u0026ndash;1001 (2017). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1126/science.aar2299\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1126/science.aar2299\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDeisseroth, K., Hegemann, P.: The form and function of channelrhodopsin. Science. \u003cb\u003e357\u003c/b\u003e(6356) (2017). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1126/science.aan5544\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1126/science.aan5544\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchneider, F., Grimm, C., Hegemann, P.: Biophysics of Channelrhodopsin. Annu. Rev. Biophys. \u003cb\u003e44\u003c/b\u003e, 167\u0026ndash;186 (2015). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1146/annurev-biophys-060414-034014\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1146/annurev-biophys-060414-034014\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDreier, M.-A., Althoff, P., Norahan, M.J., et al.: Time-resolved spectroscopic and electrophysiological data reveal insights in the gating mechanism of anion channelrhodopsin. Commun. Biol. \u003cb\u003e4\u003c/b\u003e(1), 578 (2021). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s42003-021-02101-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s42003-021-02101-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarczarek, F., Gerwert, K.: Functional waters in intraprotein proton transfer monitored by FTIR difference spectroscopy. Nature. \u003cb\u003e439\u003c/b\u003e(7072), 109\u0026ndash;112 (2006). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/nature04231\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/nature04231\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarczarek, F., Brown, L.S., Lanyi, J.K., Gerwert, K.: Proton binding within a membrane protein by a protonated water cluster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. \u003cb\u003e102\u003c/b\u003e(10), 3633\u0026ndash;3638 (2005). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1073/pnas.0500421102\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1073/pnas.0500421102\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBarth, A.: Infrared spectroscopy of proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. \u003cb\u003e1767\u003c/b\u003e(9), 1073\u0026ndash;1101 (2007). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.06.004\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.06.004\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBarth, A., Zscherp, C.: What vibrations tell us about proteins. Q. Rev. Biophys. \u003cb\u003e35\u003c/b\u003e(4), 369\u0026ndash;430 (2002). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1017/S0033583502003815\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1017/S0033583502003815\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAtaka, K., Kottke, T., Heberle, J.: Thinner, smaller, faster: IR techniques to probe the functionality of biological and biomimetic systems. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. \u003cb\u003e49\u003c/b\u003e(32), 5416\u0026ndash;5424 (2010). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1002/anie.200907114\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/anie.200907114\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKandori, H.: Ion-pumping microbial rhodopsins. Front. Mol. Biosci. \u003cb\u003e2\u003c/b\u003e, 52 (2015). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fmolb.2015.00052\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fmolb.2015.00052\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOgren, J.I., Yi, A., Mamaev, S., Li, H., Spudich, J.L., Rothschild, K.J.: Proton transfers in a channelrhodopsin-1 studied by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectroscopy and site-directed mutagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. \u003cb\u003e290\u003c/b\u003e(20), 12719\u0026ndash;12730 (2015). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1074/jbc.M114.634840\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1074/jbc.M114.634840\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKuhne, J., Vierock, J., Tennigkeit, S.A., et al.: Unifying photocycle model for light adaptation and temporal evolution of cation conductance in channelrhodopsin-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. \u003cb\u003e116\u003c/b\u003e(19), 9380\u0026ndash;9389 (2019). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1073/pnas.1818707116\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1073/pnas.1818707116\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSineshchekov, O.A., Govorunova, E.G., Li, H., Wang, X., Spudich, J.L.: \u003cem\u003eThe photoactive site modulates current rectification and channel closing in the natural anion channelrhodopsin Gt ACR1\u003c/em\u003e; (2019)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKuhne, J., Eisenhauer, K., Ritter, E., Hegemann, P., Gerwert, K., Bartl, F.: Early formation of the ion-conducting pore in channelrhodopsin-2. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. \u003cb\u003e54\u003c/b\u003e(16), 4953\u0026ndash;4957 (2015). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1002/anie.201410180\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/anie.201410180\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEisenhauer, K., Kuhne, J., Ritter, E., et al.: In channelrhodopsin-2 Glu-90 is crucial for ion selectivity and is deprotonated during the photocycle. J. Biol. Chem. \u003cb\u003e287\u003c/b\u003e(9), 6904\u0026ndash;6911 (2012). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1074/jbc.M111.327700\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1074/jbc.M111.327700\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRuffert, K., Himmel, B., Lall, D., et al.: Glutamate residue 90 in the predicted transmembrane domain 2 is crucial for cation flux through channelrhodopsin 2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. \u003cb\u003e410\u003c/b\u003e(4), 737\u0026ndash;743 (2011). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.06.024\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.06.024\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eL\u0026oacute;renz-Fonfr\u0026iacute;a, V.A., Heberle, J.: Channelrhodopsin unchained: structure and mechanism of a light-gated cation channel. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. \u003cb\u003e1837\u003c/b\u003e(5), 626\u0026ndash;642 (2014). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.10.014\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.10.014\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eL\u0026oacute;renz-Fonfr\u0026iacute;a, V.A., Resler, T., Krause, N., et al.: Transient protonation changes in channelrhodopsin-2 and their relevance to channel gating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. \u003cb\u003e110\u003c/b\u003e(14), E1273\u0026ndash;E1281 (2013). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1073/pnas.1219502110\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1073/pnas.1219502110\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTsujimura, M., Kojima, K., Kawanishi, S., Sudo, Y., Ishikita, H.: \u003cem\u003eProton-mediated gating mechanism of anion channelrhodopsin-1\u003c/em\u003e; (2021)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShikakura, T., Cheng, C., Hasegawa, T., Hayashi, S.: Exploring Protonation State, Ion Binding, and Photoactivated Channel Opening of an Anion Channelrhodopsin by Molecular Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B. \u003cb\u003e128\u003c/b\u003e(36), 8613\u0026ndash;8627 (2024). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c03216\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c03216\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSzundi, I., Kliger, D.S.: The open channel state in anion channelrhodopsin GtACR1 is a red-absorbing intermediate. Biophys. J. \u003cb\u003e123\u003c/b\u003e(8), 940\u0026ndash;946 (2024). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.bpj.2024.03.006\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.bpj.2024.03.006\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSzundi, I., Kliger, D.S.: Parallel photocycle kinetic model of anion channelrhodopsin GtACR1 function. Biophys. J. \u003cb\u003e123\u003c/b\u003e(12), 1735\u0026ndash;1750 (2024). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.bpj.2024.05.016\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.bpj.2024.05.016\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRadu, I., Bamann, C., Nack, M., Nagel, G., Bamberg, E., Heberle, J.: Conformational changes of channelrhodopsin-2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. \u003cb\u003e131\u003c/b\u003e(21), 7313\u0026ndash;7319 (2009). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1021/ja8084274\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1021/ja8084274\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKarbalaei, M., Rezaee, S.A., Farsiani, H.: Pichia pastoris: A highly successful expression system for optimal synthesis of heterologous proteins. J. Cell. Physiol. \u003cb\u003e235\u003c/b\u003e(9), 5867\u0026ndash;5881 (2020). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1002/jcp.29583\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/jcp.29583\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMacauley-Patrick, S., Fazenda, M.L., McNeil, B., Harvey, L.M.: Heterologous protein production using the Pichia pastoris expression system. Yeast. \u003cb\u003e22\u003c/b\u003e(4), 249\u0026ndash;270 (2005). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1002/yea.1208\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/yea.1208\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStritt, P., Jawurek, M., Hauser, K.: Mid-IR quantum cascade laser spectroscopy to resolve lipid dynamics during the photocycle of bacteriorhodopsin. J. Chem. Phys. \u003cb\u003e158\u003c/b\u003e(15) (2023). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1063/5.0139808\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1063/5.0139808\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eK\u0026ouml;tting, C., Gerwert, K.: Proteins in action monitored by time-resolved FTIR spectroscopy. Chemphyschem. \u003cb\u003e6\u003c/b\u003e(5), 881\u0026ndash;888 (2005). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1002/cphc.200400504\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/cphc.200400504\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"nature-portfolio","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Nature Portfolio","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":false,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5677201/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5677201/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eOptogenetics is a method to regulate cells using light. It is applied to study neurons and to develop diagnostic and therapeutic tools for neuron-related diseases. The cation-conducting channelrhodopsin ChR2 triggers photoinduced depolarization of neuronal cells but generates very low ion currents due to the \u003cem\u003esyn\u003c/em\u003e-pathway of its branched photocycle. In contrast, the homologous anion-conducting ACR1 from \u003cem\u003eGuillardia theta\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1), exhibits high photocurrents. Here, we investigate the mechanistic cause for the observed high photocurrents in \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 using FTIR spectroscopy. Unexpectedly, we discovered that the O intermediate of \u003cem\u003eGt\u003c/em\u003eACR1 is photoactivable, allowing for fast and efficient channel reopening. Our vibrational spectra show a photocyclic reaction sequence after O excitation similar to the ground state photocycle but with slightly altered channel conformation and protonation states. Our results provide deeper insights into the gating mechanism of channelrhodopsins and pave the way to advance the development of optimized optogenetic tools in future.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"A Second Photoactivatable State of the Anion-conducting channelrhodopsin GtACR1 empowers persistent activity","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-03-17 18:15:13","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5677201/v1","editorialEvents":[],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"communications-biology","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"commsbio","sideBox":"Learn more about [Communications Biology](http://www.nature.com/commsbio/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Communications Biology","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Communications Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"55ddc4d1-50d8-406d-bbcf-af7016a4787e","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 17th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[{"id":43265399,"name":"Biological sciences/Biophysics/Molecular biophysics"},{"id":43265400,"name":"Biological sciences/Biological techniques/Optical spectroscopy/Infrared spectroscopy"},{"id":43265401,"name":"Biological sciences/Biological techniques/Optogenetics"},{"id":43265402,"name":"Biological sciences/Biophysics/Membrane biophysics"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-07-17T20:25:10+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-03-17 18:15:13","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5677201","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5677201","identity":"rs-5677201","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.