Molecular characterization of enteroviruses in patients with acute respiratory infection and influenza-like illness in the Central African Republic revealed mainly polioviruses and other enteric enterovirus types.

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Enteroviruses (EVs) that infect humans cause a broad range of pathologies, notably neurological, respiratory, cutaneous and enteric diseases, leading to morbidity and mortality, especially in young children. These pathologies particularly affect countries in Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. In the last decades, some EVs with a marked respiratory tropism have emerged as source of acute respiratory illnesses: EV-D68 has been associated with outbreaks of severe respiratory distress and acute myelitis since 2014 while several respiratory genotypes belonging to the species Enterovirus coxsackiepol were discovered in the 2010s. Very little is known about the latter, and no data exist on their circulation or clinical impact in the Central African Republic. In an attempt to bridge this gap, a retrospective study was carried out on nasopharyngeal samples collected as part of influenza surveillance at five sentinel sites in Central Africa Republic in 2019. A total of 178 samples negative for influenza viruses were pooled and screened for the detection of EVs (rhinoviruses excluded). A positive result was obtained for 17 out of 20 pools. Genomic amplification was attempted by using generic primers against EVs (rhinoviruses excluded) and the virus genomes were partly sequenced by Illumina technology. A total of 46 contigs covered the VP1 region. The corresponding viruses belonged to several virus types of three species: E. coxsackiepol (14/26, 58.3%), E. betacoxsackie (9/26, 34.6%) and E. alphacoxsackie (3/26, 11.5%). Unexpectedly, no respiratory virus types (such as EV-D68, EV-C104, EV-C105, EV-C109, EV-C117 or EV-C118) were detected. Of note, polioviruses from vaccine origin were detected in 8 pools (40.0%), supporting the notion that respiratory specimens may serve as a source for poliovirus re-introduction after eradication. In conclusion, we did not detect any respiratory EVs, a finding that most likely reflects a low baseline prevalence of these viruses during inter-epidemic periods. Moreover, we confirmed that several EV types whose primary replication site is the gastrointestinal tract are also capable of replicating in the oropharynx. These findings suggest that respiratory surveillance platforms in the Central African Republic may capture a broader spectrum of EVs than initially anticipated, including polioviruses. Our results support the hypothesis that upper respiratory sampling may provide complementary insight into EV ecology beyond classical respiratory types. Strengthening integrated and syndromic molecular surveillance will be essential to better delineate enterovirus transmission dynamics and to support post-polio risk monitoring in Central Africa.
Full text 2,966 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Full text loading... Abstract Enteroviruses (EVs) that infect humans cause a broad range of pathologies, notably neurological, respiratory, cutaneous and enteric diseases, leading to morbidity and mortality, especially in young children. These pathologies particularly affect countries in Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. In the last decades, some EVs with a marked respiratory tropism have emerged as source of acute respiratory illnesses: EV-D68 has been associated with outbreaks of severe respiratory distress and acute myelitis since 2014 while several respiratory genotypes belonging to the species Enterovirus coxsackiepol were discovered in the 2010s. Very little is known about the latter, and no data exist on their circulation or clinical impact in the Central African Republic. In an attempt to bridge this gap, a retrospective study was carried out on nasopharyngeal samples collected as part of influenza surveillance at five sentinel sites in Central Africa Republic in 2019. A total of 178 samples negative for influenza viruses were pooled and screened for the detection of EVs (rhinoviruses excluded). A positive result was obtained for 17 out of 20 pools. Genomic amplification was attempted by using generic primers against EVs (rhinoviruses excluded) and the virus genomes were partly sequenced by Illumina technology. A total of 46 contigs covered the VP1 region. The corresponding viruses belonged to several virus types of three species: E. coxsackiepol (14/26, 58.3%), E. betacoxsackie (9/26, 34.6%) and E. alphacoxsackie (3/26, 11.5%). Unexpectedly, no respiratory virus types (such as EV-D68, EV-C104, EV-C105, EV-C109, EV-C117 or EV-C118) were detected. Of note, polioviruses from vaccine origin were detected in 8 pools (40.0%), supporting the notion that respiratory specimens may serve as a source for poliovirus re-introduction after eradication. In conclusion, we did not detect any respiratory EVs, a finding that most likely reflects a low baseline prevalence of these viruses during inter-epidemic periods. Moreover, we confirmed that several EV types whose primary replication site is the gastrointestinal tract are also capable of replicating in the oropharynx. These findings suggest that respiratory surveillance platforms in the Central African Republic may capture a broader spectrum of EVs than initially anticipated, including polioviruses. Our results support the hypothesis that upper respiratory sampling may provide complementary insight into EV ecology beyond classical respiratory types. Strengthening integrated and syndromic molecular surveillance will be essential to better delineate enterovirus transmission dynamics and to support post-polio risk monitoring in Central Africa. - Received: - Version Posted: Funding - Institut Pasteur (FR) (Award PTR-161) - Principal Award Recipient: Mael Bessaud - Pasteur Network Foundation (Award Pasteur Network Doctoral Grant 83-2023) - Principal Award Recipient: Joël W. Doté

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00