PGP 9.5 Positive Neural Fibers in Eutopic Endometrium of Women with Endometriosis: A Prospective Case-Control Study

In: Türk Üreme Tıbbı ve Cerrahisi Dergisi · 2025 · vol. 9(3) , pp. 91–96 · doi:10.24074/tjrms.2025-116346 · W7122766776
article OA: diamond CC0

Abstract

Objective: TTo investigate the presence and number of PGP 9.5-positive endometrial neural fibers in women with sonographically confirmed endometrioma and pain symptoms, and to compare these findings with an asymptomatic control population.Material and Methods: In this prospective case-control study, 59 women aged 18-49 years were divided into 2 groups (31 endometriosis, 28 controls).The endometriosis group consisted of women with ultrasoundconfirmed endometrioma.Controls had normal ultrasonography and underwent endometrial biopsy for abnormal uterine bleeding without pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, infertility, or clinical suspicion of endometriosis.Pain severity was graded using the Biberoglu-Behrman scale.Pipelle was used to sample the eutopic endometrium.Specimens were stained for PGP 9.5 using an automated immunohistochemical platform.A single blinded gynecologic pathologist evaluated neural fibers.Appropriate parametric and non-parametric tests were applied, and p<0.05 was considered significant.Results: Mean age, age at menarche, and parity distributions were comparable, whereas median gravidity was lower in the endometriosis group (p=0.005).Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain were substantially more frequent and severe among endometriosis patients (all p<0.001).PGP 9.5 positive neural fibers were detected in 2/31 (6.5%) cases and 1/28 (3.6%) controls, with no significant difference in detection rates (p=0.599).Conclusion: In hormone-naive women sampled in the mid-proliferative phase, PGP 9.5 positive endometrial neural fibers were uncommon and did not discriminate endometriosis-associated pain from asymptomatic controls.Larger laparoscopically validated studies using standardized quantification are needed to clarify eutopic innervation and any biomarker role in pain phenotypes.
Full text 1,857 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective TTo investigate the presence and number of PGP 9.5-positive endometrial neural fibers in women with sonographically confirmed endometrioma and pain symptoms, and to compare these findings with an asymptomatic control population.

Material and methods

In this prospective case–control study, 59 women aged 18-49 years were divided into 2 groups (31 endometriosis, 28 controls). The endometriosis group consisted of women with ultrasoundconfirmed endometrioma. Controls had normal ultrasonography and underwent endometrial biopsy for abnormal uterine bleeding without pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, infertility, or clinical suspicion of endometriosis. Pain severity was graded using the Biberoglu–Behrman scale. Pipelle was used to sample the eutopic endometrium. Specimens were stained for PGP 9.5 using an automated immunohistochemical platform. A single blinded gynecologic pathologist evaluated neural fibers. Appropriate parametric and non-parametric tests were applied, and p<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Mean age, age at menarche, and parity distributions were comparable, whereas median gravidity was lower in the endometriosis group (p=0.005). Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain were substantially more frequent and severe among endometriosis patients (all p<0.001). PGP 9.5 positive neural fibers were detected in 2/31 (6.5%) cases and 1/28 (3.6%) controls, with no significant difference in detection rates (p=0.599).

Conclusion

In hormone-naive women sampled in the mid-proliferative phase, PGP 9.5 positive endometrial neural fibers were uncommon and did not discriminate endometriosis- associated pain from asymptomatic controls. Larger laparoscopically validated studies using standardized quantification are needed to clarify eutopic innervation and any biomarker role in pain phenotypes.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

Biberoglu-Behrman

Condition tags

endometriosisendometriomachronic_pelvic_paindysmenorrheadyspareuniainfertility

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK