Case report on resistant postpartum hemorrhage during cesarean section treated with a modified quadruple uterine belt suture technique for uterus preservation
This case report describes a modified quadruple uterine belt suture technique that achieved successful hemostasis and uterus preservation in a patient experiencing severe postpartum hemorrhage during cesarean section due to complex placental and uterine abnormalities.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This case report describes a 40+2-week pregnant patient who developed severe postpartum hemorrhage during cesarean section, with blood loss up to 2,500 mL, in the context of gestational diabetes mellitus and prenatal fever. The hemorrhage was attributed to complex placental pathology and uterine conditions, including complete dense adhesion between placenta and membranes, partial placental implantation on the posterior uterine wall, extensive intrauterine adhesions with pseudocyst formation, and uterine atony; multiple conventional hemostatic interventions (including uterotonic agents, arterial ligation, local figure-of-eight sutures, and intrauterine packing) failed. Emergency modified quadruple uterine belt (dorsal) suturing was then used and reportedly achieved rapid hemostasis with successful uterine preservation, followed by multidisciplinary postoperative infection control and thrombosis/anemia/albumin management, with favorable 3-month follow-up imaging. Limitations include that evidence is limited to a single case and the report’s conclusions are not generalizable beyond this scenario. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
4,521 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· 3 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Conclusions
Acknowledgements
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-08-09T06:04:05.141522+00:00