A study of prevalence of thyroid dysfunction in abnormal uterine bleeding
This study found a 24.9% prevalence of thyroid dysfunction among 153 women with abnormal uterine bleeding, with subclinical hypothyroidism being the most common form.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This hospital-based prospective cross-sectional study assessed the prevalence of thyroid dysfunction among 153 reproductive-age women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding over two years in Bangalore. After excluding women with known thyroid disease or other gynecologic diagnoses including endometriosis and adenomyosis, the authors found 24.9% had thyroid dysfunction: 14.4% subclinical hypothyroidism, 9.2% overt hypothyroidism, and 1.3% hyperthyroidism, with euthyroid status in 75.2% of participants; they also reported that TSH was the most sensitive test used. The study’s main limitation is its hospital-based design and exclusion criteria that limit generalizability to broader AUB populations, particularly those with coexisting thyroid disease or certain uterine conditions. Relevance to endometriosis: adenomyosis and endometriosis were explicitly excluded from the study’s AUB cohort, so the findings pertain to thyroid dysfunction in AUB cases without these conditions.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
4,463 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Background
Methods
Results
Conclusions
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (9)
- W1577362193 via openalex
- W1607732053 via openalex
- W2099828950 via openalex
- W2122094404 via openalex
- W2589044585 via openalex
- W2618739817 via openalex
- W2738479503 via openalex
- W3148377640 via openalex
- W6678285217 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00