Your Blood is Out for Delivery: Considerations of Shipping Time and Temperature on Degradation of RNA from Stabilized Whole Blood

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Remote research studies are an invaluable tool for reaching populations in geographical regions with limited access to large medical centers or universities. To expand the remote study toolkit, we have previously developed homeRNA, which allows for at-home self-collection and stabilization of blood and demonstrated the feasibility of using homeRNA in high temperature climates. Here, we expand upon this work through a systematic study exploring the effects of high temperature on RNA integrity through in-lab and field experiments. Compared to the frozen controls (overall mean RIN of 8.2, n = 8), samples kept at 37°C for 2, 4, and 8 days had mean RINs of 7.6, 5.9, and 5.2 ( n = 3), respectively, indicating that typical shipping conditions (∼2 days) yield samples suitable for downstream RNA sequencing. Shorter time intervals (6 hours) resulted in minimal RNA degradation (median RIN of 6.4, n = 3) even at higher temperatures (50°C) compared to the frozen control (mean RIN of 7.8, n = 3). Additionally, we shipped homeRNA-stabilized blood from a single donor to 14 different states and back during the summer with continuous temperature probes (7.1 median RIN, n = 42). Samples from all locations were analyzed with 3’ mRNA-seq to assess differences in gene counts, with the transcriptomic data suggesting that there was no preferential degradation of transcripts as a result of different shipping times, temperatures, and regions. Overall, our data support that homeRNA can be used in elevated temperature conditions, enabling decentralized sample collection for telemedicine, global health, and clinical research.
Full text 2,788 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Remote research studies are an invaluable tool for reaching populations in geographical regions with limited access to large medical centers or universities. To expand the remote study toolkit, we have previously developed homeRNA, which allows for at-home self-collection and stabilization of blood and demonstrated the feasibility of using homeRNA in high temperature climates. Here, we expand upon this work through a systematic study exploring the effects of high temperature on RNA integrity through in-lab and field experiments. Compared to the frozen controls (overall mean RIN of 8.2, n = 8), samples kept at 37°C for 2, 4, and 8 days had mean RINs of 7.6, 5.9, and 5.2 (n = 3), respectively, indicating that typical shipping conditions (∼2 days) yield samples suitable for downstream RNA sequencing. Shorter time intervals (6 hours) resulted in minimal RNA degradation (median RIN of 6.4, n = 3) even at higher temperatures (50°C) compared to the frozen control (mean RIN of 7.8, n = 3). Additionally, we shipped homeRNA-stabilized blood from a single donor to 14 different states and back during the summer with continuous temperature probes (7.1 median RIN, n = 42). Samples from all locations were analyzed with 3’ mRNA-seq to assess differences in gene counts, with the transcriptomic data suggesting that there was no preferential degradation of transcripts as a result of different shipping times, temperatures, and regions. Overall, our data support that homeRNA can be used in elevated temperature conditions, enabling decentralized sample collection for telemedicine, global health, and clinical research. Competing Interest Statement EB, AJH, and ABT filed patent 17/361,322 (Publication Number: US20210402406A1) and EB, AJH, ABT, and FS filed patent 63/571,012 through the University of Washington on homeRNA and a related technology. ABT reports filing multiple patents through the University of Washington and receiving a gift to support research outside the submitted work from Ionis Pharmaceuticals. EB has ownership in Salus Discovery, LLC, and Tasso, Inc. that develops blood collection systems used in this manuscript, and is employed by Tasso, Inc. Technologies from Salus Discovery, LLC are not included in this publication. He is an inventor on multiple patents filed by Tasso, Inc., the University of Washington, and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the University of Washington in accordance with its policies governing outside work and financial conflicts of interest in research. LGB, SN, and AJH have also filed additional patents through the University of Washington outside the scope of this publication. Footnotes Updated figure captions to include BioRender.com citation.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00