Full text
55,891 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Integrating Genome-wide and Epigenome-wide Associations for Antipsychotic Induced Extrapyramidal Side Effects | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Integrating Genome-wide and Epigenome-wide Associations for Antipsychotic Induced Extrapyramidal Side Effects View ORCID Profile Kai Yao , View ORCID Profile Johan H. Thygesen , View ORCID Profile Siobhan K. Lock , Antonio F. Pardiñas , Antonia L. Pritchard , Michael C. O’Donovan , Michael J. Owen , James T. R. Walters , David St Clair , Nick Bass , View ORCID Profile Andrew McQuillin doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.27.25323006 Kai Yao 1 Molecular Psychiatry Laboratory, Division of Psychiatry, University College London , Rockefeller Building, 21 University Street , London, WC1E 6BT Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Kai Yao Johan H. Thygesen 2 Institute of Health Informatics, University College London , London, UK Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Johan H. Thygesen Siobhan K. Lock 3 Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University , Hadyn Ellis Building, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Siobhan K. Lock Antonio F. Pardiñas 3 Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University , Hadyn Ellis Building, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Antonia L. Pritchard 4 Division of Biomedical Science, University of the Highlands and Islands , An Lochran, Inverness, IV2 5NA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Michael C. O’Donovan 3 Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University , Hadyn Ellis Building, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Michael J. Owen 3 Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University , Hadyn Ellis Building, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site James T. R. Walters 3 Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University , Hadyn Ellis Building, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site David St Clair 5 School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition University of Aberdeen, King’s College , Aberdeen, AB24 3FX Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Nick Bass 1 Molecular Psychiatry Laboratory, Division of Psychiatry, University College London , Rockefeller Building, 21 University Street , London, WC1E 6BT Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Andrew McQuillin 1 Molecular Psychiatry Laboratory, Division of Psychiatry, University College London , Rockefeller Building, 21 University Street , London, WC1E 6BT Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Andrew McQuillin For correspondence: a.mcquillin{at}ucl.ac.uk Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Background and Hypothesis Antipsychotic medications are the first-line treatment for schizophrenia. However, around 40% of people with schizophrenia who are treated with antipsychotics could develop extrapyramidal side-effects (EPSE) including: 1) Dyskinesias, 2) Parkinsonism, 3) Akathisia, and 4) Dystonia. Study Design We conducted Genome-wide association (GWAS) and Epigenome-wide association (EWAS) meta-analysis of EPSE utilising data from previous schizophrenia case control studies. We integrated significant EWAS findings to an EPSE GWAS meta-analysis to enhance our understanding of the functional impact of common variants on EPSE. We also investigated whether polygenic risk scores (PRS) for schizophrenia, Parkinson’s disease, and Lewy-body dementia could be predictive of EPSE development. Study Results The top index SNP rs2709733 (A/G) from EPSE GWAS (p=2.214×10 -7 ) mapped to a long intergenic non-protein coding RNA, LINC01162 with consistent effects across all cohorts. We identified 9 differentially methylated positions (DMPs) associated with EPSE when controlling for methylation age, sex, derived estimates of cell composition, smoking score, and schizophrenia PRS. Four of the DMPs cg14531564, cg20647656, cg12004641, cg22845912, and their affiliated genes ( SDF4, ANKMY1, TNS1, SLA ) were associated with the risk of developing EPSE and not with schizophrenia risk. Another DMP (cg12044923) which mapped to the STK32B gene, showed significant enrichment for association with risk of EPSE. Conclusions Our study sheds new light on the potential biological mechanisms underlying EPSE development in schizophrenia, highlighting the importance of exploring both methylation shifts and common SNP associations. Further research with larger samples sizes and a focus on the role of STK32B are encouraged. Introduction Antipsychotic medications are the first-line treatment for schizophrenia. 1 Although many people benefit, around 70% may experience treatment failure such as psychiatric rehospitalization, suicide attempt, discontinuation or switch to other medication. 2 Extrapyramidal side-effects (EPSE) are common with antipsychotic treatment, 3 , 4 with approximately 40% of patients treated with first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) experiencing EPSE. 5 FGAs are primarily dopamine D2 receptor antagonists, which reduce dopaminergic activity to alleviate positive symptoms of psychosis. This, however, often leads to motor side effects such as EPSE, 6 which describe the movement abnormalities induced by antipsychotics including: Dyskinesia , hyperkinetic choreiform involuntary movements of the face, extremities, and the trunk. 7 When dyskinesia persists for more than one month it is termed tardive dyskinesia which can sometimes become chronic. Parkinsonism , symptoms of rigidity, tremor and impaired or slow movement (bradykinesia). 8 Akathisia , characterised by subjective inner restlessness and objective increase in motor activity such as pacing. 9 Dystonia , characterised by sustained and abnormal contractions, that can result in abnormal movements and postures. 10 These movement abnormalities can lead to severe impairment and reduction in the quality of life of individuals with schizophrenia, 11 by interfering with daily living activities and social functioning. 12 , 13 In a meta-analysis, the prevalence of spontaneous dyskinesias and parkinsonism was found to be higher in antipsychotic-naive patients with schizophrenia and in first-degree relatives of patients with SCZ as compared to healthy controls, indicating a heritable, non-drug induced component to these abnormalities. 14 Parkinsonism seen in EPSE can be clinically indistinguishable from the movement abnormalities seen in the neurological disorders like Parkinson’s disease (PD) and Lewy Body Dementia (LBD). Previous studies have identified shared significant loci between SCZ and PD. 15 , 16 For example, SCZ and PD are both associated with the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. 17 A duplication of the SNCA gene, for which pathogenic variants are associated with autosomal dominant Parkinson’s and encodes α-synuclein, a major constituent of LBD, was reported in an individual diagnosed with SCZ nine years prior to the development of mild Parkinsonism. 18 A recent neuroimaging study on individuals with first episode psychosis found that higher iron loading in the basal ganglia correlated with greater motor abnormalities including EPSE. 19 Similar associations were found with motor abnormalities in PD. 20 , 21 In view of this, it is plausible that there are shared genetic features between these disorders which also contribute to the shared phenotypical features including movement abnormalities like EPSE in SCZ. Genome-wide Association Studies (GWAS) are a promising approach to identify potential genes associated with development of EPSE given the often-complex biological pathways implicated in psychiatric traits. 22 However, to our knowledge, only one past study investigated antipsychotic induced EPSE using GWAS. 23 The genotype data in that study had somewhat limited genomic coverage compared to contemporary studies and furthermore there was no imputation of genotypes not captured on the genotyping array. Epigenome-wide Association Study (EWAS) allows for the examination of environmentally induced methylome variation which could directly result from chronic antipsychotic exposure. 24 , 25 To date, there has been no EWAS on EPSE to examine the influence from antipsychotics. Our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying EPSE may be improved using an integrated functional genomics strategy. The overall aim of this study was to conduct an integrated GWAS and EWAS meta-analysis of EPSE data from existing schizophrenia studies. We also investigated whether Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) for schizophrenia, PD and LBD could be used to predict risk of the development of EPSEs. The findings could provide a better understanding of the genetic underpinnings of EPSE and pave the way for the identification of informative genetic biomarkers that could allow for specific tailoring of treatments in the future. Method Participants Selection and Genotyping UCL Participants All UCL participants received an ICD10 diagnosis of schizophrenia from a UK National Health Service (NHS) psychiatrist. Details have been reported elsewhere. 26 , 27 Ancestrally matched healthy controls were recruited from the National Health Service (NHS) blood transfusion service and from study sites where case participants were also being recruited. The healthy controls were screened for an absence of a lifetime history of the following disorders: schizophrenia and any other psychosis, major affective or schizoaffective disorders, eating disorders, alcohol/drug addiction, and obsessive-compulsive disorders. All participants read an approved information sheet and signed a physical informed consent form. The study was approved by the NHS Metropolitan Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee (MREC/03/11/090). Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism data were generated in three waves at the Broad Institute, Boston, MA, US, using the, Affymetrix Array, Illumina PsychArray, and Illumina Global Screening Array (GSA). The three waves of data underwent equivalent quality control and imputation methods which had been described in details elsewhere. 28 Aberdeen Participants The Aberdeen case–control sample has been described elsewhere. 29 Briefly, the cohort contains participants with schizophrenia and healthy controls who have self-identified as born in the British Isles (95% in Scotland). All participants with schizophrenia met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders fourth edition (DSM-IV) 30 and ICD-10 criteria for schizophrenia. 26 Controls were volunteers recruited through general practices in Scotland. Volunteers who replied to a written invitation were interviewed using a short questionnaire to exclude major mental illness in the individual themselves and their first-degree relatives. The study was approved by both local and multiregional academic ethical committees and all cases and controls gave informed consent. The samples were genotyped at the Broad Institute, as described for the UCL participants. Cardiff Participants Participants were recruited from community mental health teams in Wales and England on the basis of a clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (depressed sub-type) as described previously. 31 Diagnosis was confirmed following a SCAN interview 32 and review of case notes followed by consensus diagnosis according to DSM-IV criteria 30 . The UK Multicentre Research Ethics Committee (MREC) approved the study and all participants provided informed consent. The samples were genotyped at the Broad Institute, as described for the UCL participants. UK Biobank (UKB) Participants UKB is a biomedical database and research resource of approximately 500,000 individuals from across the UK aged 40 to 69 years at recruitment (between 2006 and 2010). 33 Potential participants in UKB were selected using diagnosis of schizophrenia from ICD10, including codes from F20.0 to F20.9 and excluding participants with any primary Parkinson disorder with G20. Coding of Extrapyramidal Side-effects Data Participant EPSE status was derived from clinical data recorded following: (1) diagnosis of schizophrenia, (2) prescription of antipsychotic medications (FGA or second generation antipsychotics; SGA); (3) recorded clinical features of EPSE side-effects; and/or recorded medications prescribed to alleviate EPSE side-effects. We used keywords to classify participants with schizophrenia as cases (having EPSE) or controls (not having EPSE). These key words covered two main areas: behavioural and pharmacological (Supplementary Table 1 and 2): 1) Behavioural features of the four types of EPSE, (dystonia, akathisia, parkinsonism, and dyskinesia) . To compile a list of keywords for each of these EPSE types, we consulted several rating scales that are frequently employed to measure EPSE including: The Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), 34 the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS), 35 The Simpson Angus Scale, 36 and the Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS). 37 In addition, we searched reliable sources of clinical information for each of these abnormalities including the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines 38 and the BMJ Best Practice. 39 2) Pharmacological treatments for EPSE. To generate key words for pharmacological treatments for EPSE, we searched The NICE guidelines 38 and The Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines in Psychiatry 40 for the most recent recommendations on managing EPSE to identify a list of medications. The UCL and Aberdeen participants’ EPSE status was derived using the same list of key words described in Supplementary Table S1 and S2. The Cardiff participants’ EPSE status coding had a few minor adaptions. The keywords “dribbling” was added as it better captured other saliva-related key-words; ‘shakes’ was removed as it was described in the context of anxiety; “still” was removed as it referred to still doing something not being physically still; “tap” was removed as it was in the context of ‘tapered’; “march” was removed as it referenced the month of March; “irritable” was removed as it was in the context of IBS/irritable bowel syndrome; “parkin” was removed as it referred to Parkinson’s disease not parkinsonism; ‘tropin’ was excluded as it captured atropine as opposed to benzatropine. The UKB participants were retained if they received any first or second generation of antipsychotics (See medication codes in Supplementary Table S3 and S4), then stratified by whether participants received any medication to treat EPSE (See EPSE medication codes in Supplementary Table S5); diagnosis of other drug-induced secondary Parkinsonism in G21.1; Drug-induced dystonia in G24.0 or Drug-induced tremor in G25.1 were selected as cases. GWAS Meta-analyses & Follow-up Analyses For each set of samples, we applied logistic regression taking a within case design based on the participants’ EPSE status (participants with schizophrenia and antipsychotic exposure having EPSE vs not having EPSE) to evaluate the association between imputed SNP dosages. For UCL participants, we performed three separate GWAS for data from each wave using PLINK v2.00a2LM. 41 The participants’ age, sex and the first three principal components of population structure were included as covariates to control for population stratification. We conducted the same sets of analyses for Aberdeen, Cardiff, and UKB samples separately where Cardiff and UKB analyses included seven additional principal components as default. We then conducted fixed-effect meta-analysis taking each GWAS’s effective sample sizes (Neff) as weights using METAL (See calculation of Neff in Supplementary Table S6). 42 The genome-wide significance threshold was set at P<5×10 −08 . The output results were uploaded to FUMA for interpreations. 43 EWAS methylation data Methylation data was only available on a small proportion of individuals. In consideration of sample size, we switched to a between case design for the EWAS taking participants with schizophrenia and antipsychotic exposure having EPSE vs healthy controls (64 EPSE cases and 322 healthy controls from UCL; and 54 EPSE cases and 433 healthy controls from Aberdeen). In addition, comparing EPSE cases with healthy controls may provide clearer insights into accumulated methylation changes resulting from long-term antipsychotic exposure. The EZ-96 DNA Methylation kit (Zymo Research, CA, USA) was used to treat 500ng of DNA from each sample with sodium bisulfite in duplicate. DNA methylation was quantified using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip (Illumina Inc.) run on an Illumina iScan System (Illumina) using the manufacturers’ standard protocol. Detailed data collection and imputation process has been described elsewhere. 44 As smoking status information was not present for all samples, we estimated a proxy based on the DNA methylation profile at sites known to be associated with smoking status following a previously described approach. 45 EWAS analysis and Meta-analyses As cell composition data were not available for these DNA samples, these were estimated from the DNA methylation data using both the Epigenetic Clock software 46 and Houseman algorithm, 47 , 48 including seven variables recommended in the documentation for the Epigenetic Clock in the regression analysis and smoking score. DNA methylation values for each probe were regressed against case–control status with covariates for methylation age, gender, seven cell composition scores, and smoking score. To eliminate potential schizophrenia influence from a between case design, we included the participants’ schizophrenia PRS as an additional covariate. The EWAS meta-analysis significance threshold was set at 1x10 -07 . EWAS Integration and Permutation test We performed separate GWAS on the same participants used in EWAS following the same procedure described. The results were combined using METAL and clumped to represent LD independent loci in lead using the 1000 genome European samples as a reference. 49 Any significant CpG sites from EWAS were mapped to within 250 kb of each in the associated GWAS results to identify an enrichment in the region. To quantify significance, 5000 random permutations were generated. Empirical P values for each region were calculated by counting how many of the permutations had more significant P values than the mapped P value from GWAS and dividing by the total number of permutations performed. The CpG sites’ locations were also mapped to clumped schizophrenia GWAS results within 250 kb for comparisons. 27 Regional plots were produced using GWASLab. 50 PRS Calculation & Analyses We calculated the participants’ PRSs for schizophrenia, Lewy body dementia and Parkinson’s disease using the PRS-CS method with the latest available reference GWAS. 51 We chose the European samples from the 1000 Genomes Project Consortium as our LD reference panel given all samples included were of European Ancestry. 49 Once weights were produced, individual PRSs were calculated using PLINK v2.00a2LM. 52 We then used the mean and standard deviation of the healthy controls’ PRSs from each sample to standardize their cases’ PRSs. The SCZ GWAS came from Trubetskoy et al. (PGC wave 3), which were derived exclusively from European samples. 27 The GWAS statistics for Parkinson’s disease came from European samples of Nalls et al. excluding 23andMe data. 15 The GWAS statistics for Lewybody dementia came from Chia et al., only including European samples. 53 We adapted the schizophrenia GWAS to exclude each sample’s participants used in the current study to avoid sample overlap. The new GWAS generation followed the same procedures as previously described. 27 We performed multiple logistic regression analyses to assess how these various PRSs predict the presence of EPSE in each sample. Then the results were meta-analysed using a fixed effect model. The assumptions for logistic regressions were pre-checked and found to be satisfactory for each regression. The significant threshold was kept as 0.0167 (i.e. 0.05/3), for multiple testing correction. Results GWAS Sample demographics Overall, the GWAS meta-analysis included 2471 participants with schizophrenia, of whom 1178 (48%) had EPSE. The participants had a mean age of 46.57 (SD 12.22) years old and were mostly males (70%; Table 1 ) as is typical of genomic studies of schizophrenia. All participants had antipsychotic exposure and most of the participants had taken at least one type of SGA (78%). The participants with and without EPSE did not differ in terms of age at assessment (46.53 vs 46.62, p =0.855) nor sex (males 71% vs 69%, p =0.213). EPSE was more prevalent in those who had taken the first generation of antipsychotics (47% vs 34%, p <0.001). The participants’ characteristics differed between sample sets (Supplementary Table S6). The participants who developed EPSE were at an older age at assessment than those who did not in the UCL (46.33 vs 42.72, p <0.001) and UKB samples (56.06 vs 53.94, p =0.020; Supplementary Table S6). In the Cardiff sample, participants who developed EPSE had an earlier age of schizophrenia onset (24.30 vs 27.50, p =0.006). The pattern of EPSE being more prevalent in those who have taken the first generation of antipsychotics were consistent across most cohorts (UCL 60% vs 40% p <0.001; Aberdeen 64% vs 39% p <0.001; UKB 69% vs 30% p <0.001) except for the Cardiff samples where most participants only had exposure to the second generation of antipsychotics (first 18% vs second 82%). View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1. GWAS Participants’ Demographics and Clinical Characteristics concerning EPSE Presence GWAS Results We did not observe any SNP passing the genome-wide significance threshold at 5x10 -08 ( Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 1). We found no evidence for population inflation across the samples given the lambda value of 1, suggesting the test statistics are not inflated by population stratification or cryptic relatedness (Supplementary Figure 2). We observed no evidence for excessive heterogeneity across the samples. The top index SNP rs2709733 (A/G; Z=5.180; p =2.214×10 -07 ) mapped to a long intergenic non-protein coding RNA, LINC01162 and its effect was consistent across all cohorts ( Table 2 ). The other affiliated protein-coding genes from the suggestive SNPs included USP36 and CYTH1 from rs11077391 ( p =3.765×10 -06 ) and RBMS3 from rs6779029 ( p =4.674×10 -06 ). EWAS Sample demographics The UCL participants who developed EPSE were younger than the healthy controls in terms of age at assessment (36.90 vs 44.48, p <0.001; See Supplementary Table S7) and methylation age (39.54 vs 44.08, p =0.008). The UCL EPSE cases also had higher ratios of males (81% vs 44%, p <0.001). The Aberdeen participants’ methylation age (54.29 vs 53.04, p =0.473), and males’ ratio (70% vs 74%, p =0.737) were balanced between the EPSE and the control group. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 2. Regions of the Genome showing the Strongest Association Signals with EPSE Presence EWAS Meta-analysis Results and Permutation Testing In total, we identified 9 differentially methylated positions (DMPs) associated with EPSE presence among schizophrenia participants ( p <1×10 −07 ) when controlling for methylation age, sex, derived estimates of cell composition, smoking score, and schizophrenia PRS ( Table 3 ). Five of these identified DMPs have been implicated by past schizophrenia EWAS meta-analysis including cg12524168, p=7.61×10 -20 ; cg05419385, p=3.08×10 -18 ; cg22583147, p=5.66×10 -22 ; cg12044923, p=1.32×10 -19 ; and cg20730966, p=4.90×10 -24 . 44 The other four DMPs cg14531564, cg20647656, cg12004641, cg22845912, and their affiliated genes SDF4 , ANKMY1 , TNS1 , SLA were not identified in past schizophrenia or smoking EWAS. 45 , 54 View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 3. EPSE-associated differentially Methylated Positions We next examined whether the locations of theses DMPs could map to the corresponding GWAS of the same samples or to previously published schizophrenia GWAS. The GWAS summary statistics were first clumped so that multiple non-independent associations were collapsed into single associated loci. None of the identified DMPs were found to be associated with any genome-wide significant loci from past schizophrenia GWAS according to our regional mapping (Supplementary Figure 3-11). 27 The SNP rs7622757 within a 250kb window with cg22583147 was closest to genome-wide significance at p =4.44×10 -07 (Supplementary Figure 8). Our mapping of the DMPs to the GWAS of associated samples found that cg12044923 was significantly associated (permutation p =0.010) with index SNP rs13108591 which had a GWAS p value of 7.482×10 -05 . cg20647656 was associated (permutation p =0.030) with index SNP rs75037293 which had a GWAS p value of 2.73×10 -04 . According to the past schizophrenia GWAS, the SNPs rs13108591 (T/C) had p value of 0.761 and rs75037293 (G/C) had p value of 0.117 indicating minor relevance to schizophrenia. 27 The SNP rs13108591 is located on chr4:5162317 (hg19), mapping to the intron of STK32B . SNP rs75037293 is located on chr2:241453995 (hg19) mapping to the intron of ANKMY1 . PRS Results We found no evidence to suggest any of the selected PRS could predict the development of EPSE ( Table 4 ). According to the fixed model meta-analysis, the participants’ genetic predisposition to Schizophrenia ( p =0.566), Parkinson’s disease ( p =0.492), and Lewy-body dementia ( p =0.765) were not associated with the presence of EPSE. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 4. Results of Multiple Regression Analyses Discussion In the present study, we report the largest GWAS meta-analysis of EPSE and the first EWAS meta-analysis of EPSE. The prevalence of any type of EPSE was found to be 48% among participants who have taken either FGA or SGA independent of age and sex. EPSE was found to be more prevalent among those who have taken FGA. No SNP passed the genome-wide threshold of significance. The top index SNP rs2709733 mapped to a long intergenic non-protein coding RNA, LINC01162 with consistent effect across all cohorts. In addition, we identified multiple DMPs associated with EPSE. The gene STK32B implicated by cg12044923 seemed relevant to both psychiatric and movement disorder. We found no evidence that participants’ schizophrenia, Parkinson’s, and Lewy-body dementia PRSs predict EPSE development. The GWAS meta-analysis results may represent a false negative due to the limited sample size and power; but the data produced here are the result of a concerted effort to increase sample size as a starting point for future studies. Other factors may also be relevant. For example, FGA primarily target dopamine D2 receptors, particularly in the mesolimbic pathway. 6 Strong D2 antagonism in other pathways, notably the nigrostriatal pathway, is associated with a higher risk of EPSE. 55 SGA targets both dopamine D2 and other receptors such as 5-HT2A . Serotonin modulation offsets some dopamine blockade effects thus reducing EPSE. 56 , 57 Combining participants who have taken either FGA or SGA may conflict identification of genetic risk, given each drug type may have distinct pharmacological mechanisms and biological effects. Alternatively, the negative GWAS and PRS findings may suggest that EPSE are more strongly driven by epigenetic modifications over time. Studies have suggested that methylation changes in dopaminergic or serotonergic pathway genes may impact motor control pathways more dynamically than SNP-based variations. 58 This dynamic epigenetic regulation aligns with how EPSE can vary significantly among patients and change with continued antipsychotic use, whereas GWAS-derived SNPs only offer a static view of genetic risk. Therefore, integrating EWAS may provide insights into the gene-environment interactions involved in EPSE development. Our permutation test from EWAS implicated that two genes ANKMY1 and STK32B were of significant relevance to the presence of EPSE. ANKMY1 encodes the protein Ankyrin Repeat and MYND Domain Containing 1, which has a role for protein-protein interactions and cellular signalling. This could indirectly influence pathways relevant to neurodevelopment or dopamine signalling. However, we have found little additional corroborating evidence directly linking ANKMY1 to schizophrenia or EPSE. The other implicated gene STK32B encodes for a member of the human N-myristoylated proteins, which are involved in various cellular signalling and transduction pathways, although its exact biological function remains insufficiently defined. 59 A 520-kb homozygous deletion encompassing STK32B has been described in Ellis-Van-Creveld syndrome, which is a rare genetic disorder that primarily affects the skeletal system and other tissues. 60 Notably, changes in the methylation of the STK32B promoter region have been previously linked to both schizophrenia and anxiety disorders. It is suggested that the protein plays a role in executive functions such as working memory and selective attention. 44 , 61 Moreover, STK32B was implicated in a GWAS of essential tremor, 62 and patients with essential tremor showed increased expression of STK32B in the cerebellar cortex, highlighting a potential relevance to movement abnormalities. The current study has several limitations. First, the study’s data collection was cross-sectional and we could not investigate how the methylation shifts were introduced by anti-psychotics and EPSE development over time. We used a mixed definition of EPSE, which may introduce variability in the classification and characterization of EPSE symptoms. Additionally, our analysis included mixed antipsychotic medications and EPSE medications, each of which may have distinct profiles of EPSE risk, contributing to potential heterogeneity in the manifestations of EPSE. This variability could impact the consistency of our findings and warrant careful consideration in future studies to clarify the effects of specific antipsychotic medications on EPSE with increased sample size to do so. In addition, although we have implemented strategies to control for collider bias related to schizophrenia, our results may still be influenced by participants’ genetic predispositions to schizophrenia. Overall, our study provides new insights into the biological mechanisms underlying EPSE development in patients with schizophrenia. Notably, our approach integrated findings from EWAS with GWAS results, allowing us to explore EPSE- associated methylation shifts using accessible SNP data. The findings of this study indicate that further investigation of the epigenetics of EPSE and the role of STK32B in EPSE is likely to enhance our understanding and inform future research and treatment directions. Funding Recruitment of a proportion of the UCL schizophrenia and control samples and for genotyping of the samples were supported by the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad Institute. UCL participant recruitment was also funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC grant code G1000708). The Cardiff participants were recruited by the CardiffCOGS project, supported by a Medical Research Council Programme Grant (MR/Y004094/1) and The National Centre for Mental Health (funded by the Welsh Government through Health and Care Research Wales). Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors Acknowledgments The UCL participants’ genetic and clinical data was collected with support from, the Neuroscience Research Charitable Trust, the Central London NHS (National Health Service) Blood Transfusion Service, the Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, a research lectureship from the Priory Hospitals and the National Institutes for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Research Network (MHRN). JT was supported by NIHR HDR-UK. AM and NB were supported by the UCLH NIHR BRC. ALP was supported by a legacy donation from the Schizophrenia Association of Great Britain. SKL was funded by a PhD studentship from Mental Health Research UK (MHRUK). MJO, MCOD, and JTRW are supported by a collaborative research grant from Takeda Pharmaceuticals Ltd. for a project unrelated to work presented here. AFP, MJO, MCOD, and JTRW also reported receiving grants from Akrivia Health for a project unrelated to this collaboration. The authors have declared that there are no conflicts of interest in relation to the subject of this study. References 1. ↵ Sabe M , Pillinger T , Kaiser S , et al. Half a century of research on antipsychotics and schizophrenia: A scientometric study of hotspots, nodes, bursts, and trends . Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews . 2022 ; 136 : 104608 . doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104608 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 2. ↵ Tiihonen J , Mittendorfer-Rutz E , Majak M , et al. Real-World Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Treatments in a Nationwide Cohort of 29 823 Patients With Schizophrenia . JAMA Psychiatry . 2017 ; 74 ( 7 ): 686 – 693 . doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1322 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Carbon M , Kane JM , Leucht S , Correll CU . Tardive dyskinesia risk with first- and second-generation antipsychotics in comparative randomized controlled trials: a meta-analysis . World Psychiatry . 2018 ; 17 ( 3 ): 330 – 340 . doi: 10.1002/wps.20579 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. ↵ Huhn M , Nikolakopoulou A , Schneider-Thoma J , et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 32 oral antipsychotics for the acute treatment of adults with multi- episode schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis . The Lancet . 2019 ; 394 ( 10202 ): 939 – 951 . doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31135-3 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 5. ↵ Wubeshet YS , Mohammed OS , Desse TA . Prevalence and management practice of first generation antipsychotics induced side effects among schizophrenic patients at Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital, central Ethiopia: cross-sectional study . BMC Psychiatry . 2019 ; 19 ( 1 ): 32 . doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1999-x OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 6. ↵ Kapur S , Remington G . Dopamine D2 receptors and their role in atypical antipsychotic action: still necessary and may even be sufficient . Biological Psychiatry . 2001 ; 50 ( 11 ): 873 – 883 . doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01251-3 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 7. ↵ Lim K , Lam M , Zai C , et al. Genome wide study of tardive dyskinesia in schizophrenia . Transl Psychiatry . 2021 ; 11 ( 1 ): 1 – 10 . doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01471-y OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 8. ↵ Keener AM , Bordelon YM . Parkinsonism . Semin Neurol . 2016 ;36(4):330-334. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1585097 OpenUrl CrossRef 9. ↵ Factor S , Lang A , Weiner W . Drug Induced Movement Disorders . John Wiley & Sons ; 2008 . 10. ↵ van Harten PN , Kahn RS . Tardive Dystonia . Schizophrenia Bulletin . 1999 ;25(4):741-748. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033415 OpenUrl CrossRef 11. ↵ D’Souza RS , Hooten WM. Extrapyramidal Symptoms . In: StatPearls . StatPearls Publishing ; 2023 . Accessed December 14, 2023. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534115/ 12. ↵ Fujimaki K , Morinobu S , Yamashita H , Takahashi T , Yamawaki S . Predictors of quality of life in inpatients with schizophrenia . Psychiatry Research . 2012 ; 197 ( 3 ): 199 – 205 . doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.10.023 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. ↵ Schouten HJ , Knol W , Egberts TCG , Schobben AFAM , Jansen PAF , van Marum RJ . Quality of Life of Elderly Patients With Antipsychotic-Induced Parkinsonism: A Cross-Sectional Study . Journal of the American Medical Directors Association . 2012 ; 13 ( 1 ): 82 .e1-82.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.12.003 OpenUrl CrossRef 14. ↵ Koning JP , Tenback DE , van Os J , Aleman A , Kahn RS , van Harten PN . Dyskinesia and Parkinsonism in Antipsychotic-Naive Patients With Schizophrenia, First- Degree Relatives and Healthy Controls: A Meta-analysis . Schizophrenia Bulletin . 2010 ; 36 ( 4 ): 723 – 731 . doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn146 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 15. ↵ Nalls MA , Blauwendraat C , Vallerga CL , et al. Identification of novel risk loci, causal insights, and heritable risk for Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies . The Lancet Neurology . 2019 ; 18 ( 12 ): 1091 – 1102 . doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30320-5 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 16. ↵ Smeland OB , Shadrin A , Bahrami S , et al. Genome-wide Association Analysis of Parkinson’s Disease and Schizophrenia Reveals Shared Genetic Architecture and Identifies Novel Risk Loci . Biological Psychiatry . 2021 ; 89 ( 3 ): 227 – 235 . doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.01.026 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 17. ↵ Jonas RK , Montojo CA , Bearden CE . The 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome as a Window into Complex Neuropsychiatric Disorders Over the Lifespan . Biological Psychiatry . 2014 ; 75 ( 5 ): 351 – 360 . doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.07.019 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 18. ↵ Takamura S , Ikeda A , Nishioka K , et al. Schizophrenia as a prodromal symptom in a patient harboring SNCA duplication . Parkinsonism Relat Disord . 2016 ; 25 : 108 – 109 . doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.01.028 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 19. ↵ Cuesta MJ , Lecumberri P , Moreno-Izco L , et al. Motor abnormalities and basal ganglia in first-episode psychosis (FEP) . Psychological Medicine . 2021 ; 51 ( 10 ): 1625 – 1636 . doi: 10.1017/S0033291720000343 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 20. ↵ Kim J , Wessling-Resnick M . Iron and mechanisms of emotional behavior . The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry . 2014 ; 25 ( 11 ): 1101 – 1107 . doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2014.07.003 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 21. ↵ Ward RJ , Zucca FA , Duyn JH , Crichton RR , Zecca L . The role of iron in brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders . The Lancet Neurology . 2014 ; 13 ( 10 ): 1045 – 1060 . doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70117-6 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 22. ↵ Duncan LE , Ostacher M , Ballon J . How genome-wide association studies (GWAS) made traditional candidate gene studies obsolete . Neuropsychopharmacol . 2019 ; 44 ( 9 ): 1518 – 1523 . doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0389-5 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 23. ↵ Åberg K , Adkins DE , Bukszár J , et al. Genomewide Association Study of Movement-Related Adverse Antipsychotic Effects . Biological Psychiatry . 2010 ; 67 ( 3 ): 279 – 282 . doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.08.036 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 24. ↵ Wagner JR , Busche S , Ge B , Kwan T , Pastinen T , Blanchette M . The relationship between DNA methylation, genetic and expression inter-individual variation in untransformed human fibroblasts . Genome Biol . 2014 ; 15 ( 2 ): R37 . doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r37 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 25. ↵ Murphy TM , Mill J . Epigenetics in health and disease: heralding the EWAS era . The Lancet . 2014 ; 383 ( 9933 ):1952-1954. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60269-5 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 26. ↵ World Health Organization . The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders : Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines . World Health Organization; 1992. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/37958 27. ↵ Trubetskoy V , Pardiñas AF , Qi T , et al. Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia . Nature . 2022 ; 604 ( 7906 ):502-508. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04434-5 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 28. ↵ Grigoroiu-Serbanescu M , Giaroli G , Thygesen JH , et al. Predictive power of the ADHD GWAS 2019 polygenic risk scores in independent samples of bipolar patients with childhood ADHD . Journal of Affective Disorders . 2020 ; 265 : 651 – 659 . doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.109 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 29. ↵ Stone JL , O’Donovan MC , Gurling H , et al. Rare chromosomal deletions and duplications increase risk of schizophrenia . Nature . 2008 ; 455 ( 7210 ):237-241. doi: 10.1038/nature07239 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 30. ↵ American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) . ( American Psychiatric Association , 1994 ). 31. ↵ Carroll L s. , Williams H j ., Walters J , Kirov G , O’Donovan M c. , Owen M j. Mutation screening of the 3q29 microdeletion syndrome candidate genes DLG1 and PAK2 in schizophrenia . American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics . 2011 ; 156 ( 7 ): 844 – 849 . doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.31231 OpenUrl CrossRef 32. ↵ SCAN: Schedules fonr Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry | JAMA Psychiatry | JAMA Network . Accessed October 25, 2024. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/article-abstract/495050 33. ↵ Sudlow C , Gallacher J , Allen N , et al. UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age . PLOS Medicine . 2015 ;12(3):e1001779. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 34. ↵ Munetz MR , Benjamin S . How to Examine Patients Using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale . PS . 1988 ; 39 ( 11 ): 1172 – 1177 . doi: 10.1176/ps.39.11.1172 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 35. ↵ Chouinard G , Margolese HC . Manual for the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS) . Schizophr Res . 2005 ; 76 ( 2-3 ): 247 – 265 . doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2005.02.013 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 36. ↵ Hawley C , Fineberg N , Roberts A , Baldwin D , Sahadevan A , Sharman V . The use of the Simpson Angus Scale for the assessment of movement disorder: A training guide . International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice . 2003 ; 7 ( 4 ): 349 – 2257 . doi: 10.1080/13651500310002986 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 37. ↵ Barnes TRE . A Rating Scale for Drug-Induced Akathisia . The British Journal of Psychiatry . 1989 ; 154 ( 5 ): 672 – 676 . doi: 10.1192/bjp.154.5.672 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 38. ↵ National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). ( 2014 ). Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: Treatment and management (NICE Clinical Guideline CG178) . Retrieved from https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg178 . 39. ↵ BMJ Best Practice ( 2021 ). Retrieved 13 September 2021, from https://bestpractice.bmj.com/ . 40. ↵ Taylor DM , Barnes TRE , Young AH . The Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines in Psychiatry . John Wiley & Sons ; 2021 . 41. ↵ Purcell S , Neale B , Todd-Brown K , et al. PLINK: A Tool Set for Whole-Genome Association and Population-Based Linkage Analyses . The American Journal of Human Genetics . 2007 ; 81 ( 3 ): 559 – 575 . doi: 10.1086/519795 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 42. ↵ Willer CJ , Li Y , Abecasis GR . METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans . Bioinformatics . 2010 ; 26 ( 17 ): 2190 – 2191 . doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq340 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 43. ↵ Watanabe K , Taskesen E , van Bochoven A , Posthuma D . Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA . Nat Commun . 2017 ; 8 ( 1 ): 1826 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01261-5 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 44. ↵ Hannon E , Dempster E , Viana J , et al. An integrated genetic-epigenetic analysis of schizophrenia: evidence for co-localization of genetic associations and differential DNA methylation . Genome Biology . 2016 ; 17 ( 1 ): 176 . doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1041-x OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 45. ↵ Elliott HR , Tillin T , McArdle WL , et al. Differences in smoking associated DNA methylation patterns in South Asians and Europeans . Clinical Epigenetics . 2014 ; 6 ( 1 ): 4 . doi: 10.1186/1868-7083-6-4 OpenUrl CrossRef 46. ↵ Horvath S . DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types . Genome Biology . 2013 ; 14 ( 10 ): 3156 . doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115 OpenUrl CrossRef 47. ↵ Houseman EA , Accomando WP , Koestler DC , et al. DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution . BMC Bioinformatics . 2012 ; 13 ( 1 ): 86 . doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-86 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 48. ↵ Koestler DC , Christensen BC , Karagas MR , et al. Blood-based profiles of DNA methylation predict the underlying distribution of cell types: A validation analysis . Epigenetics . 2013 ; 8 ( 8 ): 816 . doi: 10.4161/epi.25430 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 49. ↵ 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Auton A , Brooks LD , et al. A global reference for human genetic variation . Nature . 2015 ;526(7571):68-74. doi: 10.1038/nature15393 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 50. ↵ He Y , Koido M , Shimmori Y , Kamatani Y . GWASLab: a Python package for processing and visualizing GWAS summary statistics . Published online May 1 , 2023 . doi: 10.51094/jxiv.370 OpenUrl CrossRef 51. ↵ Ge T , Chen CY , Ni Y , Feng YCA , Smoller JW . Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors . Nat Commun . 2019 ; 10 ( 1 ): 1776 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09718-5 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 52. ↵ 52. Chang CC , Chow CC , Tellier LC , Vattikuti S , Purcell SM , Lee JJ. Second- generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets . GigaScience . 2015 ;4(1):s13742-015-0047-0048. doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 53. ↵ Chia R , Sabir MS , Bandres-Ciga S , et al. Genome sequencing analysis identifies new loci associated with Lewy body dementia and provides insights into its genetic architecture . Nat Genet . 2021 ; 53 ( 3 ): 294 – 303 . doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00785-3 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 54. ↵ Zeilinger S , Kühnel B , Klopp N , et al. Tobacco smoking leads to extensive genome- wide changes in DNA methylation . PLoS One . 2013 ; 8 ( 5 ): e63812 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063812 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 55. ↵ Stahl , S. M. ( 2013 ). Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific Basis and Practical Applications (4th Ed.) . 56. ↵ Leucht S , Corves C , Arbter D , Engel RR , Li C , Davis JM . Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis . The Lancet . 2009 ; 373 ( 9657 ):31-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61764-X OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 57. ↵ Zhang JP , Gallego JA , Robinson DG , Malhotra AK , Kane JM , Correll CU . Efficacy and safety of individual second-generation vs. first-generation antipsychotics in first-episode psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis . International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology . 2013 ; 16 ( 6 ): 1205 – 1218 . doi: 10.1017/S1461145712001277 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 58. ↵ Loke YJ , Hannan AJ , Craig JM . The Role of Epigenetic Change in Autism Spectrum Disorders . Frontiers in Neurology . 2015 ; 6 : 107 . doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00107 OpenUrl CrossRef 59. ↵ Takamitsu E , Otsuka M , Haebara T , et al. Identification of Human N-Myristoylated Proteins from Human Complementary DNA Resources by Cell-Free and Cellular Metabolic Labeling Analyses . PLOS ONE . 2015 ; 10 ( 8 ): e0136360 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136360 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 60. ↵ Temtamy SA , Aglan MS , Valencia M , et al. Long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE1)-mediated deletion of EVC, EVC2, C4orf6, and STK32B in Ellis–van Creveld syndrome with borderline intelligence . Human Mutation . 2008 ;29(7):931- 938. doi: 10.1002/humu.20778 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 61. ↵ Ciuculete DM , Boström AE , Tuunainen AK , et al. Changes in methylation within the STK32B promoter are associated with an increased risk for generalized anxiety disorder in adolescents . Journal of Psychiatric Research . 2018 ; 102 : 44 – 51 . doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.03.008 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 62. ↵ Müller SH , Girard SL , Hopfner F , et al. Genome-wide association study in essential tremor identifies three new loci . Brain . 2016 ; 139 ( 12 ): 3163 . doi: 10.1093/brain/aww242 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted February 28, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Integrating Genome-wide and Epigenome-wide Associations for Antipsychotic Induced Extrapyramidal Side Effects Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Integrating Genome-wide and Epigenome-wide Associations for Antipsychotic Induced Extrapyramidal Side Effects Kai Yao , Johan H. Thygesen , Siobhan K. Lock , Antonio F. Pardiñas , Antonia L. Pritchard , Michael C. O’Donovan , Michael J. Owen , James T. R. Walters , David St Clair , Nick Bass , Andrew McQuillin medRxiv 2025.02.27.25323006; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.27.25323006 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Integrating Genome-wide and Epigenome-wide Associations for Antipsychotic Induced Extrapyramidal Side Effects Kai Yao , Johan H. Thygesen , Siobhan K. Lock , Antonio F. Pardiñas , Antonia L. Pritchard , Michael C. O’Donovan , Michael J. Owen , James T. R. Walters , David St Clair , Nick Bass , Andrew McQuillin medRxiv 2025.02.27.25323006; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.27.25323006 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (568) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (300) Cardiovascular Medicine (4436) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (444) Dermatology (382) Emergency Medicine (608) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1509) Epidemiology (15229) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1124) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6600) Geriatric Medicine (668) Health Economics (997) Health Informatics (4538) Health Policy (1368) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1613) Hematology (542) HIV/AIDS (1264) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15917) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (623) Medical Ethics (146) Nephrology (667) Neurology (6599) Nursing (346) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1144) Occupational and Environmental Health (957) Oncology (3333) Ophthalmology (974) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (436) Palliative Medicine (130) Pathology (663) Pediatrics (1693) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (691) Primary Care Research (711) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5447) Public and Global Health (9232) Radiology and Imaging (2198) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1370) Respiratory Medicine (1196) Rheumatology (593) Sexual and Reproductive Health (712) Sports Medicine (530) Surgery (712) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a0104f40adc4df94',t:'MTc3OTY2Nzc0Nw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.