Context Matters: A Note on the Special Conditions for Effective AI Adoption in Organizations

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

This research note argues that successful AI integration is not solely a matter of technological capability but depends on a constellation of _special conditions_ determining whether organizations can deploy AI ethically, strategically, and sustainably. These conditions include leadership commitment, ethical governance, data ecosystem readiness, cultural adaptability, sectoral and institutional constraints, and strategic alignment. Drawing on recent interdisciplinary studies across healthcare, finance, and public administration, the note demonstrates that AI adoption often remains superficial or problematic without addressing these contextual enablers and constraints. The note emphasizes that responsible AI implementation is a socio-technical process requiring tools and the right conditions for trust, capability, and alignment. By providing a framework for identifying and cultivating these conditions, the paper contributes to ongoing efforts to guide inclusive, reflective, and context-sensitive AI adoption across diverse organizational environments.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00