From short to long reads: enhanced protist diversity profiling via Nanopore metabarcoding

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

In the last decades environmental metabarcoding has revolutionised biodiversity research, particularly for microbial organisms such as protists, enabling large-scale assessments of diversity and ecological patterns across time and space. With the advent of long-read sequencing, Nanopore-based metabarcoding represents a promising alternative to short-read approaches. Due to the limited number of available studies, the effectiveness of Nanopore sequencing - alone or in combination with short-read data - for assessing the biodiversity and ecological patterns of protists in different ecosystems is not yet sufficiently explored. Here we present BaNaNA (Barcoding Nanopore Neat Annotator), a pipeline designed to generate high-quality OTUs and abundance estimates from Nanopore sequencing data. The performance of the pipeline was evaluated using a mock community as well as on marine and freshwater environmental samples to demonstrate its relevance for protist biodiversity and ecological studies. Our results show that BaNaNA generates high-quality full-length 18S rDNA OTUs from Nanopore long reads that are directly comparable to short-read V4-18S rDNA ASVs, supporting their synergistic use in long-term biodiversity studies. While both approaches reveal similar overall community diversity, long-read OTUs provide greater taxonomic resolution, richer phylogenetic information enabling the discovery of new clades, and yield fewer false positives. These advantages make long-read Nanopore metabarcoding not only a powerful complement but also a reliable replacement to short-read methods. By providing a pipeline for processing Nanopore data, BaNaNA paves the way for a broader application of long-read Nanopore sequencing in protist ecology and biodiversity research.
Full text 1,863 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract In the last decades environmental metabarcoding has revolutionised biodiversity research, particularly for microbial organisms such as protists, enabling large-scale assessments of diversity and ecological patterns across time and space. With the advent of long-read sequencing, Nanopore-based metabarcoding represents a promising alternative to short-read approaches. Due to the limited number of available studies, the effectiveness of Nanopore sequencing - alone or in combination with short-read data - for assessing the biodiversity and ecological patterns of protists in different ecosystems is not yet sufficiently explored. Here we present BaNaNA (Barcoding Nanopore Neat Annotator), a pipeline designed to generate high-quality OTUs and abundance estimates from Nanopore sequencing data. The performance of the pipeline was evaluated using a mock community as well as on marine and freshwater environmental samples to demonstrate its relevance for protist biodiversity and ecological studies. Our results show that BaNaNA generates high-quality full-length 18S rDNA OTUs from Nanopore long reads that are directly comparable to short-read V4-18S rDNA ASVs, supporting their synergistic use in long-term biodiversity studies. While both approaches reveal similar overall community diversity, long-read OTUs provide greater taxonomic resolution, richer phylogenetic information enabling the discovery of new clades, and yield fewer false positives. These advantages make long-read Nanopore metabarcoding not only a powerful complement but also a reliable replacement to short-read methods. By providing a pipeline for processing Nanopore data, BaNaNA paves the way for a broader application of long-read Nanopore sequencing in protist ecology and biodiversity research. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00