Forever an optimist? Investigating the temporal consistency of optimism within and across life phases in rats

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

It is long known from human psychology that people differ in their perception of the world, with some judging ambiguous information more positively (i.e., “optimists”) and some more negatively (i.e., “pessimists”). About 20 years ago, this knowledge was transferred to animal welfare science to assess emotional states in animals by quantifying optimistic or pessimistic judgement biases. More recently, with increasing interest in animal personalities, researchers have also begun to explore whether differences in optimism and pessimism remain consistent across time. While first evidence suggests that optimism and pessimism represent a stable trait, less research has focused on their consistency within and across specific life phases. Using laboratory rats, we therefore aimed at systematically investigating the consistency of optimism and pessimism within and across two life phases during adulthood. Specifically, a cognitive judgement bias test relying on tactile cues was conducted twice during early and full adulthood, respectively. Temporal consistency within and across life phases was assessed by analysing the repeatability of individual optimism levels. While we did not detect consistent individual differences in optimism levels during early adulthood, they stabilized across phases and remained consistent during full adulthood. These findings align with human psychological research, suggesting that personality traits consolidate over lifetime. Despite this consolidation process, however, we also found considerable within-individual variation in overall optimism levels, indicating a high degree of behavioural plasticity. We therefore encourage future research on the ecological relevance of consistent versus flexible decision-making and highlight the significance of considering life phase when assessing behavioural traits.
Full text 2,462 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

It is long known from human psychology that people differ in their perception of the world, with some judging ambiguous information more positively (i.e., “optimists”) and some more negatively (i.e., “pessimists”). About 20 years ago, this knowledge was transferred to animal welfare science to assess emotional states in animals by quantifying optimistic or pessimistic judgement biases. More recently, with increasing interest in animal personalities, researchers have also begun to explore whether differences in optimism and pessimism remain consistent across time. While first evidence suggests that optimism and pessimism represent a stable trait, less research has focused on their consistency within and across specific life phases. Using laboratory rats, we therefore aimed at systematically investigating the consistency of optimism and pessimism within and across two life phases during adulthood. Specifically, a cognitive judgement bias test relying on tactile cues was conducted twice during early and full adulthood, respectively. Temporal consistency within and across life phases was assessed by analysing the repeatability of individual optimism levels. While we did not detect consistent individual differences in optimism levels during early adulthood, they stabilized across phases and remained consistent during full adulthood. These findings align with human psychological research, suggesting that personality traits consolidate over lifetime. Despite this consolidation process, however, we also found considerable within-individual variation in overall optimism levels, indicating a high degree of behavioural plasticity. We therefore encourage future research on the ecological relevance of consistent versus flexible decision-making and highlight the significance of considering life phase when assessing behavioural traits. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2J912 Subjects Life Sciences

Keywords

cognitive judgement bias, decision-making under ambiguity, optimists/pessimists, Animal personality, Rat, consistent behavioural traits Dates Published: 2025-01-31 00:10 License CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Additional Metadata Data and Code Availability Statement: Open data/code are not available yet but will be accessible with peer-reviewed publication. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00