Determinants of Support for Female Genital Mutilation and its Practice on Young Girls in Northern Iraq

Determinants of Support for Female Genital Mutilation and its Practice on Young Girls in Northern Iraq | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Determinants of Support for Female Genital Mutilation and its Practice on Young Girls in Northern Iraq Farman Zahir Abdullah, Bakhtiar Piroozi, Azad Shokri This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5297115/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Introduction: Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a widespread practice that affects millions of girls and women worldwide, violating their human rights and posing significant health risks. This study aims to explore the determinants of support for FGM and its practice on young girls in Northern Iraq. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in three cities, and data were collected from 348 women who had undergone FGM and had at least one daughter. The study employed logistic regression analysis to identify the factors influencing agreement with performing FGM and having a daughter undergo FGM. Results: Approximately 10% of women agreed with performing FGM, and 7% reported that their daughters had undergone the procedure. However, among those whose daughters had undergone FGM, a small subgroup expressed disagreement and held strong beliefs against its future occurrence. Religious recommendations and traditional practices were the main reasons cited by women for supporting FGM. Age, education status, marital status, and age of the daughter were found to be significant determinants. Notably, women with daughters above 10 years old and illiterate women exhibited higher odds of supporting FGM. Additionally, women with illiterate husbands were more likely to support the practice. Discussion: This study highlights the persistence of FGM in Northern Iraq and identifies key determinants associated with its practice. Efforts to eradicate FGM should focus on addressing sociocultural factors, promoting education and awareness, and engaging religious leaders and communities. By understanding the motivations behind FGM and targeting interventions accordingly, progress can be made towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and advancing gender equality. Female genital mutilation (FGM) Determinants Northern Iraq Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Introduction Female genital cutting, also known as female genital mutilation (FGM), encompasses all procedures involving the partial or complete removal of external female genitalia or other forms of injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons. It is a widespread issue affecting over 200 million girls and women worldwide [1], each year, 3 million women and girls are added [2]. FGM is practiced by numerous ethnic groups in 27 African countries, as well as in Iraq, Yemen, Indonesia, and among migrant populations from communities where FGM is prevalent [3]. The United Nations and WHO recognize FGM as a violation of human rights, and its eradication is an integral part of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [4]. Therefore, eradication of FGM by the end of 2030 is a critical objective within the framework of SDGs. This endeavor serves as a significant stride towards advancing gender equality [5]. FGM is associated with different health consequences and even death. The practice can result in pain, bleeding, infection, and urinating problems as immediate health consequences. Chronic infections, cysts, chronic pain, birth complications, and sexual and emotional suffering are examples of long-term consequences of FGM [6]. Although there has been a gradual decline in the practice of FGM, it continues to pose a considerable threat to the health and overall well-being of individuals in diverse communities [7]. Motivations for FGM vary across different contexts and individuals, but they are predominantly driven by sociocultural factors. FGM is often believed to ensure virginity before marriage, promote sexual restraint, enhance marriage prospects, improve fertility, and prepare girls for their roles as wives and mothers [8, 9]. Despite predating major religions, FGM continues to be perpetuated in some religious communities. The physical and psychological consequences of FGM are significant, yet in communities where it is practiced, these consequences are often disregarded, disconnected from the practice itself, or considered outweighed by perceived benefits [10]. FGM is a global phenomenon, but its prevalence is primarily concentrated in certain regions of Africa and Asia. Additionally, FGM is practiced in specific areas of Iraq, where approximately 7.4% of girls undergo circumcision annually [11]. In the Kurdistan region of Iraq, an autonomous region in northern Iraq, the prevalence of FGM is notably higher, with an estimated prevalence rate of approximately 40–58% [12]. Examining the perspectives and experiences of women who have undergone FGM is crucial for gaining insights into the impact of this practice, formulating effective strategies to eradicate it, and updating the existing knowledge base regarding FGM in Sulaymaniyah. Materials and Methods Study Design and Setting: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2024 in three cities of Halabja, Chamchamal, and Rania in Iraq. The study population consisted of women with a history of FGM who had at least one daughter. The sample size included 360 participants, with 120 women selected from each city through convenience sampling among women attending healthcare centers. These women were then asked about their history of FGM, and those who had undergone the procedure and expressed willingness to participate were included as study samples. Data for this study were collected using a researcher-developed checklist and completed through interviews with women with a history of FGM, conducted by three midwives. The checklist included questions about women's attitudes towards FGM, reasons for its practice, and necessary strategies for eradicating FGM. Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic characteristics of the participants, including age, education status, and marital status. The prevalence of agreement with performing FGM and having a daughter undergo FGM was calculated. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the determinants of agreement with performing FGM and having a younger daughter undergo FGM. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated initially. Adjusted odds ratios were obtained by removing variables with little effect on the dependent variable in the adjusted models. Ethics statements All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Sulaimani Polytechnic University under the ethics code No. 139.24. Also, informed consent was obtained from all subjects or legal guardian/Legally authorized representatives of illiterates. Results The study included 348 women who had undergone FGM, all of whom had at least one daughter (Table 1 ). Among them, 46.3% (161 individuals) fell within the age range of 40 to 45 years. Interestingly, the majority of the youngest daughters, comprising 52.9% (184 individuals), were older than 10 years. Additionally, it was observed that 12.1% (42 individuals) of the women were unable to read or write, and an equal proportion of 12.1% (42 individuals) had illiterate spouses. Furthermore, a notable 16.7% (58 individuals) of the women were widowed and living independently. Table 1 Descriptive statistics of demographic variables of the women who had underwent FGM and had at least one daughter (n = 348) No % Age 40> 111 31.9 40–45 161 46.3 45–50 76 21.8 Age of Daughter 10≥ 164 47.1 10< 184 52.9 Education status Illiterate 42 12.1 Primary 96 27.6 Middle school 113 32.5 High school and Diplom 60 17.2 Academic 37 10.6 Husbands' education status Illiterate 27 7.8 Primary 106 30.5 Middle school 111 31.9 High school and Diplom 67 19.3 Academic 37 10.6 Marital Status Married 290 83.3 Widow 58 16.7 FGM: Female genital mutilation Table 1 . 10% (34 individuals) of women who underwent FGM expressed agreement, with the majority citing religious recommendation (85%) and traditional practices (82%) as the main reasons supporting FGM (Fig. 1 ). Figure 1 Based on Fig. 2 , within the group of women who had undergone FGM, a total of 7% (25 individuals) reported that their daughters had also undergone FGM. Out of these 25 individuals, 4 belonged to women who held opposing views regarding the practice for their daughters. It is noteworthy that among this subgroup, 8 individuals expressed their disagreement with FGM and held strong beliefs against its future occurrence. Figure 2 Table 2 presents the determinants of agreement with performing FGM and having a smaller daughter undergo FGM in both crude and adjusted models. In the crude model, the majority of variables were found to be significant determinants of agreement with performing FGM and having a smaller daughter with FGM (p < 0.05). For instance, females in the 45 to 50 age group had 3.7 times higher odds (p = 0.003, 95% CI: 1.58–8.72) of agreeing with performing FGM and 4.84 times higher odds (p = 0.002, 95% CI: 1.74–13.46) of having a smaller daughter undergo FGM compared to females below 40 years of age. Additionally, for women whose youngest daughters were above 10 years old, the odds were 22.1 times higher (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 12.19–43.67) for agreement with performing FGM and 6.61 times higher (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 2.22–19.69) for having a smaller daughter with FGM. Illiterate women also showed significantly higher odds, 12.78 times (p = 0.018, 95% CI: 4.56–43.60) for agreement with performing FGM and 6.61 times (p = 0.025, 95% CI: 3.36–32.80) for having a smaller daughter with FGM. Also, mothers who were agree with performing FGM were more likely to have a daughter subjected to FGM (p > 0.05). In the adjusted models, the independent variables that had little effect on the dependent variable were removed to obtain the desired model. Women whose youngest daughters were above 10 years old had 36.9 times higher odds (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 8.13–67.93) for agreement with performing FGM and 10.1 times higher odds (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 3.16-32.00) for having a younger daughter undergo FGM. Illiterate women had 49.0 times higher odds (p = 0.010, 95% CI: 5.39–84.24) for agreement with performing FGM and 28.9 times higher odds (p = 0.002, 95% CI: 3.28–74.65) for having a younger daughter undergo FGM. Women with illiterate husbands had 10.3 times higher odds (p = 0.036, 95% CI: 1.16–25.38) for agreement with performing FGM (Table 2 ). Table 2 Table 2 logistic regression results for determinants of Agree with performing FGM and Having a smaller daughter with FGM Agree with performing FGM` Having a smaller daughter with FGM OR (95% CI) P-value AOR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value AOR (95% CI) P-value Age 40> 1.00 1.00 40–45 1.33 (0.52–03.39) 0.547 1.79 (0.59–5.32) 0.332 45–50 3.71 (1.58–8.72) 0.003 4.84 (1.74–13.46) 0.002 Age of Daughter 10≥ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10< 22.06 (12.19–43.67) < 0.001 36.96 (8.13–67.93) < 0.001 6.61 (2.22–19.69) 0.001 10.05 (3.16-32.00) 0.001 Education status Academic 1.00 1.00 Illiterate 12.77 (4.56–43.60) 0.018 49.02 (5.39–84.24) 0.010 11.25 (3.36–32.80) 0.025 28.89 (3.28–74.65) 0.002 School Education 3.21 (0.42–15.52) 0.262 6.64 (0.56–31.23) 0.070 1.98 (0.252–15.48) 0.517 3.58 (0.45–28.38) 0.227 Husbands' education status Academic 1.00 1.00 Illiterate 6.26 (1.66–20.57) 0.111 10.29 (1.16–25.38) 0.036 School Education 4.09 (0.54–30.98) 0.172 2.44 (0.32–18.80) 0.393 Marital Status Widow 1.00 1.00 Married 0.51 (0.23–1.17) 0.112 1.05 (0.35–3.19) 0.926 Agree with performing FGM No … 1.00 … Yes … … 125.19 (37.53-217.59) < 0.001 … … AOR: The stepwise regression method by adding or removing predictor variables to obtain the most parsimonious model Discussion The current study results indicate that 10% of women subjected to FGM consented to the procedure. The majority attributed their agreement to religious recommendations and traditional practices as the main reasons. In Egypt, this percentage was around 30%, with religious and social reasons being the major factors [13]. In Ethiopia, 48% of respondents favored continuing FGM, and 47% stated that they would have it performed on their children due to issues related to traditions, culture, and community values [14]. Another study conducted in Egypt reported that 82% of participants mentioned social and cultural reasons [15]. In another study conducted in Djibouti, tradition and culture were identified as the primary factors [16]. The findings of this research demonstrate that the attitudes towards FGM and the likelihood of subjecting their daughters to FGM are influenced by various factors. Among the factors investigated, the age of the youngest daughter, and the literacy levels of women and their husbands play a significant role. Women whose youngest daughters are over 10 years old are more than 36 times more likely to consent to FGM. Additionally, women's illiteracy increases the likelihood of FGM consent by more than 49 times. Studies conducted in African countries indicate that higher education among women has contributed to a reduction in the prevalence of FGM [17]. These findings are also consistent with a study conducted in rural communities in Nigeria, where participants without formal education are more likely to accept and engage in FGM [18]. Studies in Ethiopia have similarly shown that higher maternal education is associated with a lower likelihood of FGM among women [19]. This result aligns with a study conducted in a Sudanese village, which revealed that a woman's education level plays a significant role in her decision-making and attitude towards this practice [20]. This finding is consistent with a study conducted in Sudan, reporting a higher prevalence of FGM/C among the impoverished population [21]. Poverty restricts individuals' access to education and, as a result, can be a major obstacle for women to become aware of the harmful effects of FGM or gain knowledge about it. In other words, educated women are more likely to evaluate the advantages and risks of FGM before making a decision [22]. Similarly, high levels of FGM were observed in Sudan and Sierra Leone for each age group, indicating a significant prevalence of FGM among women in these countries [21, 23]. Furthermore, mothers at older ages were found to have a higher likelihood of being affected by FGM in 19 Sub-Saharan African countries [24]. The present study also revealed that women with younger daughters over the age of 10 were more inclined to support the circumcision of girls. It is presumed that younger respondents are more likely to have received education, which increases their exposure to FGM education and the associated harmful effects, thereby influencing their decisions [25]. Furthermore, the results of this study indicate that women whose youngest daughters are over 10 years old are 10 times more likely to subject their daughters to FGM. Additionally, women with low literacy levels are more than 29 times more likely to practice FGM on their daughters. Similarly, women whose husbands have low literacy levels are also more than 10 times more likely to consent to FGM. Higher education among mothers in African countries [9, 24] and the Eastern Mediterranean region [26, 27] has been shown to decrease the likelihood of families opting for FGM for their daughters [21]. Similarly, in West Africa, women without formal education were over 4 times more likely to subject their daughters to FGM in the future [25]. In Nigeria, a significant proportion of women in rural areas expressed the intention to perform FGM on their daughters in the future. It is expected that women in rural areas have lower educational levels and limited access to information and media compared to women living in urban areas [19]. Furthermore, we found that there is a correlation between fathers' lower education levels and mothers' positive attitudes towards FGM, as well as the practice of FGM on their daughters. Similarly, studies indicate that a significant portion of fathers in families had involvement in the decision-making process regarding FGM, and therefore, a higher education level of fathers played a protective role against FGM [28, 29], although in some studies, no association between fathers' education and FGM was found [2]. Ultimately, as the results showed, mothers who had a positive attitude towards FGM were highly likely to have a daughter subjected to FGM. Similar studies also demonstrated that mothers who had a positive attitude towards the continuation of FGM were more likely to have their daughters exposed to FGM [27, 30]. The present study has some limitations, including the limited scope of identifiable variables considered. Additional factors such as wealth, religion, occupational status and employment, knowledge of FGM, village/urban residency, and other related factors could have potentially enriched the study's findings and analysis. Conclusion Several determinants of agreement with performing FGM and having a younger daughter undergo FGM were identified. Factors such as age, education status, age of the youngest daughter, and husband's education status were found to have influential associations with support for FGM. Efforts should focus on addressing sociocultural norms, promoting education and awareness, and engaging religious and community leaders to challenge the misconceptions and harmful beliefs associated with FGM. Additionally, empowering women and girls through education and providing alternative opportunities can contribute to changing attitudes and behaviors related to FGM. Declarations Financial support and sponsorship This study did not receive any kinds of funding resources. Conflicting Interest (If present, give more details): The authors declare that they have no conflicts interests. Author Contribution Authors Contributions Conceptualization: Farman Zahir Abdullah and Azad Shokri.Data curation: Bakhtiar Piroozi and Farman Zahir Abdullah.Formal analysis: Azad Shokri. Methodology: Bakhtiar Piroozi and Azad ShokriSupervision: Farman Zahir AbdullahWriting: Bakhtiar Piroozi, Farman Zahir Abdullah and Azad ShokriAll authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript Acknowledgments The authors of this article would like to thank all the participants who took part in this study. References Unicef, Female Genital Mutilation/cutting: a Global Concern. UNICEF's Data Work on FGM/C . 2016: Unicef. Ahmed, M.R., et al., Psychological impact of female genital mutilation among adolescent Egyptian girls: a cross-sectional study. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 2017. 22 (4): p. 280-285. Abdulcadir, J., M. Rodriguez, and L. Say, Research gaps in the care of women with female genital mutilation: an analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2015. 122 (3): p. 294-303. Agwor, D.O., E.H. Nyekwere, and I.C. Okogbule, A Legal Assessment of the Protection of the Human Rights of Women and Children under the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the Light of Some Selected Human Rights Instruments. 2022. Weny, K., et al., Towards the elimination of FGM by 2030: A statistical assessment. PLoS One, 2020. 15 (10): p. e0238782. Bjälkander, O., et al., Health complications of female genital mutilation in Sierra Leone. International journal of women's health, 2012: p. 321-331. Chikhungu, L.C. and N.J. Madise, Trends and protective factors of female genital mutilation in Burkina Faso: 1999 to 2010. International journal for Equity in Health, 2015. 14 : p. 1-10. UNICEF, Female genital mutilation/cutting: a global concern. 2016 [ http://www.unicef.org/media/files/FGMC_2016_brochure_final_UNICEF_SPREAD.pdf ] . 2016, Accessed. Greis, A., et al., Attitudes towards female genital cutting among adolescents in rural Burkina Faso: a multilevel analysis. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 2020. 25 (1): p. 119-131. Johansen, R.E.B., N.J. Diop, G. Laverack, and E. Leye, What works and what does not: a discussion of popular approaches for the abandonment of female genital mutilation. Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2013. 2013 . UNICEF. Protecting girls in Iraq from female genital mutilation . 2018; Available from: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/fles/resources/Protecting%20Girls%20in%20Iraq%20from%20Female%20Genital%20Mutilation.pdf. Shabila, N., Geographical variation in the prevalence of female genital mutilation in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 2019. 25 (9): p. 630-636. Elbendary, R.N., D.A. Shokry, W.S. Deeb, and E.M. Morsi, Female genital mutilation (FGM): Is it still an existing problem in Egypt? Forensic science international, 2021. 318 : p. 110574. Abebe, S., M. Dessalegn, Y. Hailu, and M. Makonnen, Prevalence and barriers to ending female genital cutting: the case of Afar and Amhara regions of Ethiopia. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. 17 (21): p. 7960. Rohym, H.H. and H.S. Mahmoud, Female genital mutilation/cutting is continued problem. The Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences and Applied Toxicology, 2023. 23 (3): p. 45-53. Martinelli, M. and J.E. Ollé-Goig, Female genital mutilation in Djibouti. African health sciences, 2012. 12 (4): p. 412-415. Asekun-Olarinmoye, E.O. and O.A. Amusan, The impact of health education on attitudes towards female genital mutilation (FGM) in a rural Nigerian community. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 2008. 13 (3): p. 289-297. Allam, M., et al., Factors associated with the condoning of female genital mutilation among university students. Public health, 2001. 115 (5): p. 350-355. Setegn, T., Y. Lakew, and K. Deribe, Geographic variation and factors associated with female genital mutilation among reproductive age women in Ethiopia: a national population based survey. PloS one, 2016. 11 (1): p. e0145329. Almroth, L., Genital mutilation of girls in Sudan: community-and hospital-based studies on female genital cutting and its sequelae . 2005: Karolinska Institutet (Sweden). Elduma, A.H., Female genital mutilation in Sudan. Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 2018. 6 (2): p. 430. Adhikari, R., Effect of Women’s autonomy on maternal health service utilization in Nepal: a cross sectional study. BMC women's health, 2016. 16 : p. 1-7. Sabahelzain, M.M., et al., Decision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan: a cross-sectional study. Global health research and policy, 2019. 4 : p. 1-8. Beller, J. and C. Kröger, Differential effects from aspects of religion on female genital mutilation/cutting. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2021. 13 (4): p. 381. Ameyaw, E.K., et al., Female genital mutilation/cutting in Sierra Leone: are educated women intending to circumcise their daughters? BMC international health and human rights, 2020. 20 : p. 1-11. Saleem, R.A., et al., Female genital mutilation in Iraqi Kurdistan: description and associated factors. Women & health, 2013. 53 (6): p. 537-551. Alosaimi, A.N., et al., Factors associated with female genital cutting in Yemen and its policy implications. Midwifery, 2019. 74 : p. 99-106. Yasin, B.A., N.G. Al-Tawil, N.P. Shabila, and T.S. Al-Hadithi, Female genital mutilation among Iraqi Kurdish women: a cross-sectional study from Erbil city. BMC public health, 2013. 13 : p. 1-8. Arafa, A.E., R.S. Elbahrawe, S.M. Shawky, and A.M. Abbas, Epidemiological and gynecological correlates with female genital mutilation among Beni-Suef University students; cross sectional study. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 2018. 23 (3): p. 184-188. Kandala, N.-B., et al., A spatial analysis of the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting among 0–14-year-old girls in Kenya. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. 16 (21): p. 4155. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5297115","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":368332054,"identity":"2e565ab5-8983-4223-976d-ba531744e87d","order_by":0,"name":"Farman Zahir Abdullah","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Charmo University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Farman","middleName":"Zahir","lastName":"Abdullah","suffix":""},{"id":368332057,"identity":"bceff700-f1c8-44cc-b866-674b088f5387","order_by":1,"name":"Bakhtiar Piroozi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bakhtiar","middleName":"","lastName":"Piroozi","suffix":""},{"id":368332058,"identity":"bcb6f36a-f93a-4458-b593-3d81e94b9915","order_by":2,"name":"Azad Shokri","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Azad","middleName":"","lastName":"Shokri","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-10-20 06:53:18","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5297115/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5297115/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":67927348,"identity":"4e22c919-3df7-4665-a26b-afa569cf5538","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-31 09:18:32","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":126894,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePrevalence and Reasons for Women's Agreement with Performing FGM (Female genital mutilation)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5297115/v1/ec3853f848296a7c52d7ce22.png"},{"id":67927347,"identity":"46781116-111e-4fa9-a1ef-f703d546ef1f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-31 09:18:32","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":112840,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eHaving a Daughter with FGM and Expressing Satisfaction about FGM (Female genital mutilation)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5297115/v1/34b2d90619dfc774d28630f1.png"},{"id":74303858,"identity":"d91fa327-e555-49b8-b073-500cd862056e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-01-20 22:31:21","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":960554,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5297115/v1/75ff64a0-9365-4f46-9f2d-cf86ed13cc29.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Determinants of Support for Female Genital Mutilation and its Practice on Young Girls in Northern Iraq","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eFemale genital cutting, also known as female genital mutilation (FGM), encompasses all procedures involving the partial or complete removal of external female genitalia or other forms of injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons. It is a widespread issue affecting over 200\u0026nbsp;million girls and women worldwide [1], each year, 3\u0026nbsp;million women and girls are added [2]. FGM is practiced by numerous ethnic groups in 27 African countries, as well as in Iraq, Yemen, Indonesia, and among migrant populations from communities where FGM is prevalent [3]. The United Nations and WHO recognize FGM as a violation of human rights, and its eradication is an integral part of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [4]. Therefore, eradication of FGM by the end of 2030 is a critical objective within the framework of SDGs. This endeavor serves as a significant stride towards advancing gender equality [5]. FGM is associated with different health consequences and even death. The practice can result in pain, bleeding, infection, and urinating problems as immediate health consequences. Chronic infections, cysts, chronic pain, birth complications, and sexual and emotional suffering are examples of long-term consequences of FGM [6].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlthough there has been a gradual decline in the practice of FGM, it continues to pose a considerable threat to the health and overall well-being of individuals in diverse communities [7]. Motivations for FGM vary across different contexts and individuals, but they are predominantly driven by sociocultural factors. FGM is often believed to ensure virginity before marriage, promote sexual restraint, enhance marriage prospects, improve fertility, and prepare girls for their roles as wives and mothers [8, 9]. Despite predating major religions, FGM continues to be perpetuated in some religious communities. The physical and psychological consequences of FGM are significant, yet in communities where it is practiced, these consequences are often disregarded, disconnected from the practice itself, or considered outweighed by perceived benefits [10].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFGM is a global phenomenon, but its prevalence is primarily concentrated in certain regions of Africa and Asia. Additionally, FGM is practiced in specific areas of Iraq, where approximately 7.4% of girls undergo circumcision annually [11]. In the Kurdistan region of Iraq, an autonomous region in northern Iraq, the prevalence of FGM is notably higher, with an estimated prevalence rate of approximately 40\u0026ndash;58% [12].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eExamining the perspectives and experiences of women who have undergone FGM is crucial for gaining insights into the impact of this practice, formulating effective strategies to eradicate it, and updating the existing knowledge base regarding FGM in Sulaymaniyah.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003eStudy Design and Setting:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis cross-sectional study was conducted in 2024 in three cities of Halabja, Chamchamal, and Rania in Iraq. The study population consisted of women with a history of FGM who had at least one daughter. The sample size included 360 participants, with 120 women selected from each city through convenience sampling among women attending healthcare centers. These women were then asked about their history of FGM, and those who had undergone the procedure and expressed willingness to participate were included as study samples. Data for this study were collected using a researcher-developed checklist and completed through interviews with women with a history of FGM, conducted by three midwives. The checklist included questions about women's attitudes towards FGM, reasons for its practice, and necessary strategies for eradicating FGM.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical Analysis:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic characteristics of the participants, including age, education status, and marital status. The prevalence of agreement with performing FGM and having a daughter undergo FGM was calculated. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the determinants of agreement with performing FGM and having a younger daughter undergo FGM. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated initially. Adjusted odds ratios were obtained by removing variables with little effect on the dependent variable in the adjusted models.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eEthics statements\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll procedures performed in studies involving human participants were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Sulaimani Polytechnic University under the ethics code No. 139.24. Also, informed consent was obtained from all subjects or legal guardian/Legally authorized representatives of illiterates.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe study included 348 women who had undergone FGM, all of whom had at least one daughter (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). Among them, 46.3% (161 individuals) fell within the age range of 40 to 45 years. Interestingly, the majority of the youngest daughters, comprising 52.9% (184 individuals), were older than 10 years. Additionally, it was observed that 12.1% (42 individuals) of the women were unable to read or write, and an equal proportion of 12.1% (42 individuals) had illiterate spouses. Furthermore, a notable 16.7% (58 individuals) of the women were widowed and living independently.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescriptive statistics of demographic variables of the women who had underwent FGM and had at least one daughter (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;348)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAge\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40\u0026gt;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e111\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e31.9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40\u0026ndash;45\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e161\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e46.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e45\u0026ndash;50\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e76\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAge of Daughter\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u0026ge;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e164\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e47.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u0026lt;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e184\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e52.9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eEducation status\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIlliterate\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrimary\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e96\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e27.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMiddle school\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e113\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e32.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh school and Diplom\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e60\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcademic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eHusbands' education status\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIlliterate\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e27\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrimary\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e106\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMiddle school\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e111\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e31.9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh school and Diplom\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e67\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e19.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcademic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eMarital Status\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMarried\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e290\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e83.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWidow\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e58\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16.7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"4\"\u003eFGM: Female genital mutilation\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e10% (34 individuals) of women who underwent FGM expressed agreement, with the majority citing religious recommendation (85%) and traditional practices (82%) as the main reasons supporting FGM (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFigure \u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBased on Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, within the group of women who had undergone FGM, a total of 7% (25 individuals) reported that their daughters had also undergone FGM. Out of these 25 individuals, 4 belonged to women who held opposing views regarding the practice for their daughters. It is noteworthy that among this subgroup, 8 individuals expressed their disagreement with FGM and held strong beliefs against its future occurrence.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFigure \u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e presents the determinants of agreement with performing FGM and having a smaller daughter undergo FGM in both crude and adjusted models. In the crude model, the majority of variables were found to be significant determinants of agreement with performing FGM and having a smaller daughter with FGM (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). For instance, females in the 45 to 50 age group had 3.7 times higher odds (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.003, 95% CI: 1.58\u0026ndash;8.72) of agreeing with performing FGM and 4.84 times higher odds (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.002, 95% CI: 1.74\u0026ndash;13.46) of having a smaller daughter undergo FGM compared to females below 40 years of age. Additionally, for women whose youngest daughters were above 10 years old, the odds were 22.1 times higher (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001, 95% CI: 12.19\u0026ndash;43.67) for agreement with performing FGM and 6.61 times higher (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001, 95% CI: 2.22\u0026ndash;19.69) for having a smaller daughter with FGM. Illiterate women also showed significantly higher odds, 12.78 times (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.018, 95% CI: 4.56\u0026ndash;43.60) for agreement with performing FGM and 6.61 times (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.025, 95% CI: 3.36\u0026ndash;32.80) for having a smaller daughter with FGM. Also, mothers who were agree with performing FGM were more likely to have a daughter subjected to FGM (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the adjusted models, the independent variables that had little effect on the dependent variable were removed to obtain the desired model. Women whose youngest daughters were above 10 years old had 36.9 times higher odds (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001, 95% CI: 8.13\u0026ndash;67.93) for agreement with performing FGM and 10.1 times higher odds (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001, 95% CI: 3.16-32.00) for having a younger daughter undergo FGM. Illiterate women had 49.0 times higher odds (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.010, 95% CI: 5.39\u0026ndash;84.24) for agreement with performing FGM and 28.9 times higher odds (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.002, 95% CI: 3.28\u0026ndash;74.65) for having a younger daughter undergo FGM. Women with illiterate husbands had 10.3 times higher odds (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.036, 95% CI: 1.16\u0026ndash;25.38) for agreement with performing FGM (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003elogistic regression results for determinants of Agree with performing FGM and Having a smaller daughter with FGM\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"13\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c8\" colnum=\"8\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c9\" colnum=\"9\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c10\" colnum=\"10\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c11\" colnum=\"11\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c12\" colnum=\"12\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c13\" colnum=\"13\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"5\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAgree with performing FGM`\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"5\" nameend=\"c13\" namest=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHaving a smaller daughter with FGM\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOR (95% CI)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eP-value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAOR (95% CI)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eP-value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOR (95% CI)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eP-value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAOR (95% CI)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eP-value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40\u0026gt;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40\u0026ndash;45\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.33 (0.52\u0026ndash;03.39)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.547\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.79 (0.59\u0026ndash;5.32)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.332\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e45\u0026ndash;50\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.71 (1.58\u0026ndash;8.72)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e0.003\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.84 (1.74\u0026ndash;13.46)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e0.002\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAge of Daughter\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u0026ge;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u0026lt;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e22.06 (12.19\u0026ndash;43.67)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36.96 (8.13\u0026ndash;67.93)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.61 (2.22\u0026ndash;19.69)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e0.001\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10.05 (3.16-32.00)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e0.001\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eEducation status\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcademic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIlliterate\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.77 (4.56\u0026ndash;43.60)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e0.018\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e49.02 (5.39\u0026ndash;84.24)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e0.010\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11.25 (3.36\u0026ndash;32.80)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e0.025\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e28.89 (3.28\u0026ndash;74.65)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e0.002\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSchool Education\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.21 (0.42\u0026ndash;15.52)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.262\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.64 (0.56\u0026ndash;31.23)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.070\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.98 (0.252\u0026ndash;15.48)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.517\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.58 (0.45\u0026ndash;28.38)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.227\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eHusbands' education status\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcademic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIlliterate\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.26 (1.66\u0026ndash;20.57)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.111\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10.29 (1.16\u0026ndash;25.38)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e0.036\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSchool Education\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.09 (0.54\u0026ndash;30.98)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.172\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.44 (0.32\u0026ndash;18.80)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.393\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eMarital Status\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWidow\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMarried\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.51 (0.23\u0026ndash;1.17)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.112\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.05 (0.35\u0026ndash;3.19)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.926\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAgree with performing FGM\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026hellip;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026hellip;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026hellip;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026hellip;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e125.19 (37.53-217.59)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c11\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c12\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026hellip;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c13\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026hellip;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"13\"\u003eAOR: The stepwise regression method by adding or removing predictor variables to obtain the most parsimonious model\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe current study results indicate that 10% of women subjected to FGM consented to the procedure. The majority attributed their agreement to religious recommendations and traditional practices as the main reasons. In Egypt, this percentage was around 30%, with religious and social reasons being the major factors [13]. In Ethiopia, 48% of respondents favored continuing FGM, and 47% stated that they would have it performed on their children due to issues related to traditions, culture, and community values [14]. Another study conducted in Egypt reported that 82% of participants mentioned social and cultural reasons [15]. In another study conducted in Djibouti, tradition and culture were identified as the primary factors [16].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe findings of this research demonstrate that the attitudes towards FGM and the likelihood of subjecting their daughters to FGM are influenced by various factors. Among the factors investigated, the age of the youngest daughter, and the literacy levels of women and their husbands play a significant role. Women whose youngest daughters are over 10 years old are more than 36 times more likely to consent to FGM. Additionally, women's illiteracy increases the likelihood of FGM consent by more than 49 times. Studies conducted in African countries indicate that higher education among women has contributed to a reduction in the prevalence of FGM [17]. These findings are also consistent with a study conducted in rural communities in Nigeria, where participants without formal education are more likely to accept and engage in FGM [18]. Studies in Ethiopia have similarly shown that higher maternal education is associated with a lower likelihood of FGM among women [19]. This result aligns with a study conducted in a Sudanese village, which revealed that a woman's education level plays a significant role in her decision-making and attitude towards this practice [20]. This finding is consistent with a study conducted in Sudan, reporting a higher prevalence of FGM/C among the impoverished population [21]. Poverty restricts individuals' access to education and, as a result, can be a major obstacle for women to become aware of the harmful effects of FGM or gain knowledge about it. In other words, educated women are more likely to evaluate the advantages and risks of FGM before making a decision [22].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSimilarly, high levels of FGM were observed in Sudan and Sierra Leone for each age group, indicating a significant prevalence of FGM among women in these countries [21, 23]. Furthermore, mothers at older ages were found to have a higher likelihood of being affected by FGM in 19 Sub-Saharan African countries [24]. The present study also revealed that women with younger daughters over the age of 10 were more inclined to support the circumcision of girls. It is presumed that younger respondents are more likely to have received education, which increases their exposure to FGM education and the associated harmful effects, thereby influencing their decisions [25].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurthermore, the results of this study indicate that women whose youngest daughters are over 10 years old are 10 times more likely to subject their daughters to FGM. Additionally, women with low literacy levels are more than 29 times more likely to practice FGM on their daughters. Similarly, women whose husbands have low literacy levels are also more than 10 times more likely to consent to FGM. Higher education among mothers in African countries [9, 24] and the Eastern Mediterranean region [26, 27] has been shown to decrease the likelihood of families opting for FGM for their daughters [21]. Similarly, in West Africa, women without formal education were over 4 times more likely to subject their daughters to FGM in the future [25]. In Nigeria, a significant proportion of women in rural areas expressed the intention to perform FGM on their daughters in the future. It is expected that women in rural areas have lower educational levels and limited access to information and media compared to women living in urban areas [19].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurthermore, we found that there is a correlation between fathers' lower education levels and mothers' positive attitudes towards FGM, as well as the practice of FGM on their daughters. Similarly, studies indicate that a significant portion of fathers in families had involvement in the decision-making process regarding FGM, and therefore, a higher education level of fathers played a protective role against FGM [28, 29], although in some studies, no association between fathers' education and FGM was found [2]. Ultimately, as the results showed, mothers who had a positive attitude towards FGM were highly likely to have a daughter subjected to FGM. Similar studies also demonstrated that mothers who had a positive attitude towards the continuation of FGM were more likely to have their daughters exposed to FGM [27, 30].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe present study has some limitations, including the limited scope of identifiable variables considered. Additional factors such as wealth, religion, occupational status and employment, knowledge of FGM, village/urban residency, and other related factors could have potentially enriched the study's findings and analysis.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eSeveral determinants of agreement with performing FGM and having a younger daughter undergo FGM were identified. Factors such as age, education status, age of the youngest daughter, and husband's education status were found to have influential associations with support for FGM. Efforts should focus on addressing sociocultural norms, promoting education and awareness, and engaging religious and community leaders to challenge the misconceptions and harmful beliefs associated with FGM. Additionally, empowering women and girls through education and providing alternative opportunities can contribute to changing attitudes and behaviors related to FGM.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003eFinancial support and sponsorship\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study did not receive any kinds of funding resources.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConflicting Interest (If present, give more details):\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that they have no conflicts interests.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAuthors Contributions Conceptualization: Farman Zahir Abdullah and Azad Shokri.Data curation: Bakhtiar Piroozi and Farman Zahir Abdullah.Formal analysis: Azad Shokri. Methodology: Bakhtiar Piroozi and Azad ShokriSupervision: Farman Zahir AbdullahWriting: Bakhtiar Piroozi, Farman Zahir Abdullah and Azad ShokriAll authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgments\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe authors of this article would like to thank all the participants who took part in this study.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnicef, \u003cem\u003eFemale Genital Mutilation/cutting: a Global Concern. UNICEF\u0026apos;s Data Work on FGM/C\u003c/em\u003e. 2016: Unicef.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAhmed, M.R., et al., \u003cem\u003ePsychological impact of female genital mutilation among adolescent Egyptian girls: a cross-sectional study.\u003c/em\u003e The European Journal of Contraception \u0026amp; Reproductive Health Care, 2017. \u003cstrong\u003e22\u003c/strong\u003e(4): p. 280-285.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAbdulcadir, J., M. Rodriguez, and L. Say, \u003cem\u003eResearch gaps in the care of women with female genital mutilation: an analysis.\u003c/em\u003e BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics \u0026amp; Gynaecology, 2015. \u003cstrong\u003e122\u003c/strong\u003e(3): p. 294-303.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAgwor, D.O., E.H. Nyekwere, and I.C. Okogbule, \u003cem\u003eA Legal Assessment of the Protection of the Human Rights of Women and Children under the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the Light of Some Selected Human Rights Instruments.\u003c/em\u003e 2022.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWeny, K., et al., \u003cem\u003eTowards the elimination of FGM by 2030: A statistical assessment.\u003c/em\u003e PLoS One, 2020. \u003cstrong\u003e15\u003c/strong\u003e(10): p. e0238782.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBj\u0026auml;lkander, O., et al., \u003cem\u003eHealth complications of female genital mutilation in Sierra Leone.\u003c/em\u003e International journal of women\u0026apos;s health, 2012: p. 321-331.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChikhungu, L.C. and N.J. Madise, \u003cem\u003eTrends and protective factors of female genital mutilation in Burkina Faso: 1999 to 2010.\u003c/em\u003e International journal for Equity in Health, 2015. \u003cstrong\u003e14\u003c/strong\u003e: p. 1-10.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUNICEF, \u003cem\u003eFemale genital mutilation/cutting: a global concern. 2016 [\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003ehttp://www.unicef.org/media/files/FGMC_2016_brochure_final_UNICEF_SPREAD.pdf\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e]\u003c/em\u003e. 2016, Accessed.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGreis, A., et al., \u003cem\u003eAttitudes towards female genital cutting among adolescents in rural Burkina Faso: a multilevel analysis.\u003c/em\u003e Tropical Medicine \u0026amp; International Health, 2020. \u003cstrong\u003e25\u003c/strong\u003e(1): p. 119-131.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJohansen, R.E.B., N.J. Diop, G. Laverack, and E. Leye, \u003cem\u003eWhat works and what does not: a discussion of popular approaches for the abandonment of female genital mutilation.\u003c/em\u003e Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2013. \u003cstrong\u003e2013\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUNICEF. \u003cem\u003eProtecting girls in Iraq from female genital mutilation\u003c/em\u003e. 2018; Available from: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/fles/resources/Protecting%20Girls%20in%20Iraq%20from%20Female%20Genital%20Mutilation.pdf.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShabila, N., \u003cem\u003eGeographical variation in the prevalence of female genital mutilation in the Kurdistan region of Iraq.\u003c/em\u003e Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 2019. \u003cstrong\u003e25\u003c/strong\u003e(9): p. 630-636.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eElbendary, R.N., D.A. Shokry, W.S. Deeb, and E.M. Morsi, \u003cem\u003eFemale genital mutilation (FGM): Is it still an existing problem in Egypt?\u003c/em\u003e Forensic science international, 2021. \u003cstrong\u003e318\u003c/strong\u003e: p. 110574.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAbebe, S., M. Dessalegn, Y. Hailu, and M. Makonnen, \u003cem\u003ePrevalence and barriers to ending female genital cutting: the case of Afar and Amhara regions of Ethiopia.\u003c/em\u003e International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. \u003cstrong\u003e17\u003c/strong\u003e(21): p. 7960.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRohym, H.H. and H.S. Mahmoud, \u003cem\u003eFemale genital mutilation/cutting is continued problem.\u003c/em\u003e The Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences and Applied Toxicology, 2023. \u003cstrong\u003e23\u003c/strong\u003e(3): p. 45-53.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMartinelli, M. and J.E. Oll\u0026eacute;-Goig, \u003cem\u003eFemale genital mutilation in Djibouti.\u003c/em\u003e African health sciences, 2012. \u003cstrong\u003e12\u003c/strong\u003e(4): p. 412-415.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAsekun-Olarinmoye, E.O. and O.A. Amusan, \u003cem\u003eThe impact of health education on attitudes towards female genital mutilation (FGM) in a rural Nigerian community.\u003c/em\u003e The European Journal of Contraception \u0026amp; Reproductive Health Care, 2008. \u003cstrong\u003e13\u003c/strong\u003e(3): p. 289-297.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAllam, M., et al., \u003cem\u003eFactors associated with the condoning of female genital mutilation among university students.\u003c/em\u003e Public health, 2001. \u003cstrong\u003e115\u003c/strong\u003e(5): p. 350-355.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSetegn, T., Y. Lakew, and K. Deribe, \u003cem\u003eGeographic variation and factors associated with female genital mutilation among reproductive age women in Ethiopia: a national population based survey.\u003c/em\u003e PloS one, 2016. \u003cstrong\u003e11\u003c/strong\u003e(1): p. e0145329.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlmroth, L., \u003cem\u003eGenital mutilation of girls in Sudan: community-and hospital-based studies on female genital cutting and its sequelae\u003c/em\u003e. 2005: Karolinska Institutet (Sweden).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eElduma, A.H., \u003cem\u003eFemale genital mutilation in Sudan.\u003c/em\u003e Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 2018. \u003cstrong\u003e6\u003c/strong\u003e(2): p. 430.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAdhikari, R., \u003cem\u003eEffect of Women\u0026rsquo;s autonomy on maternal health service utilization in Nepal: a cross sectional study.\u003c/em\u003e BMC women\u0026apos;s health, 2016. \u003cstrong\u003e16\u003c/strong\u003e: p. 1-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSabahelzain, M.M., et al., \u003cem\u003eDecision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan: a cross-sectional study.\u003c/em\u003e Global health research and policy, 2019. \u003cstrong\u003e4\u003c/strong\u003e: p. 1-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBeller, J. and C. Kr\u0026ouml;ger, \u003cem\u003eDifferential effects from aspects of religion on female genital mutilation/cutting.\u003c/em\u003e Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2021. \u003cstrong\u003e13\u003c/strong\u003e(4): p. 381.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAmeyaw, E.K., et al., \u003cem\u003eFemale genital mutilation/cutting in Sierra Leone: are educated women intending to circumcise their daughters?\u003c/em\u003e BMC international health and human rights, 2020. \u003cstrong\u003e20\u003c/strong\u003e: p. 1-11.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSaleem, R.A., et al., \u003cem\u003eFemale genital mutilation in Iraqi Kurdistan: description and associated factors.\u003c/em\u003e Women \u0026amp; health, 2013. \u003cstrong\u003e53\u003c/strong\u003e(6): p. 537-551.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlosaimi, A.N., et al., \u003cem\u003eFactors associated with female genital cutting in Yemen and its policy implications.\u003c/em\u003e Midwifery, 2019. \u003cstrong\u003e74\u003c/strong\u003e: p. 99-106.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYasin, B.A., N.G. Al-Tawil, N.P. Shabila, and T.S. Al-Hadithi, \u003cem\u003eFemale genital mutilation among Iraqi Kurdish women: a cross-sectional study from Erbil city.\u003c/em\u003e BMC public health, 2013. \u003cstrong\u003e13\u003c/strong\u003e: p. 1-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eArafa, A.E., R.S. Elbahrawe, S.M. Shawky, and A.M. Abbas, \u003cem\u003eEpidemiological and gynecological correlates with female genital mutilation among Beni-Suef University students; cross sectional study.\u003c/em\u003e Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 2018. \u003cstrong\u003e23\u003c/strong\u003e(3): p. 184-188.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKandala, N.-B., et al., \u003cem\u003eA spatial analysis of the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting among 0\u0026ndash;14-year-old girls in Kenya.\u003c/em\u003e International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. \u003cstrong\u003e16\u003c/strong\u003e(21): p. 4155.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Female genital mutilation (FGM), Determinants, Northern Iraq","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5297115/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5297115/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eIntroduction: Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a widespread practice that affects millions of girls and women worldwide, violating their human rights and posing significant health risks. This study aims to explore the determinants of support for FGM and its practice on young girls in Northern Iraq.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMethods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in three cities, and data were collected from 348 women who had undergone FGM and had at least one daughter. The study employed logistic regression analysis to identify the factors influencing agreement with performing FGM and having a daughter undergo FGM.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eResults: Approximately 10% of women agreed with performing FGM, and 7% reported that their daughters had undergone the procedure. However, among those whose daughters had undergone FGM, a small subgroup expressed disagreement and held strong beliefs against its future occurrence. Religious recommendations and traditional practices were the main reasons cited by women for supporting FGM. Age, education status, marital status, and age of the daughter were found to be significant determinants. Notably, women with daughters above 10 years old and illiterate women exhibited higher odds of supporting FGM. Additionally, women with illiterate husbands were more likely to support the practice.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiscussion: This study highlights the persistence of FGM in Northern Iraq and identifies key determinants associated with its practice. Efforts to eradicate FGM should focus on addressing sociocultural factors, promoting education and awareness, and engaging religious leaders and communities. By understanding the motivations behind FGM and targeting interventions accordingly, progress can be made towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and advancing gender equality.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Determinants of Support for Female Genital Mutilation and its Practice on Young Girls in Northern Iraq","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-10-31 09:18:28","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5297115/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"a0e0c822-40e1-46cd-9f85-fc8d5a7161ba","owner":[],"postedDate":"October 31st, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-01-20T22:23:16+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-10-31 09:18:28","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5297115","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5297115","identity":"rs-5297115","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}