[Continuous/extended/flexible use of combined hormonal contraceptives: Prescribing habits of practitioners in Centre Val deLoire region]

other OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

Health professionals frequently prescribe extended combined oral contraceptive regimens for various indications, demonstrating satisfactory knowledge but poor adherence to scientific guidelines.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To date, oral contraceptives remain the most frequently prescribed contraceptive method. New combined oral contraceptive (COC) regimens (continued, extended or flexible) were developed to try and space out or avoid withdrawal bleedings in order to meet women's expectations and improve their quality of life. However, there is no recommendation published regarding the management of the prescription. The purpose of our study was to describe provider's prescription habits when it comes to new COC regimens. METHODS: This is a descriptive observational study. A questionnaire was sent to gynecologists, general practitioners and midwives employed or in training in the Centre Valde Loire region. Prescription habits and knowledge about new oral contraceptive regimens were evaluated. RESULTS: 83% of health professionals frequently prescribed new COC regimens. Most frequent indications were endometriosis, severe menstruation-associated symptoms, patient's desire for amenorrhea or patient's request. The extended regimen (hormone-free interval not every month) was the most frequently used. Provider's knowledge about indications and benefits of those new regimens were satisfactory. However, scientific societies guidelines were poorly acquired. CONCLUSIONS: New COC regimens are frequently proposed by health care professionals with large variability in terms of prescription model. Along with reinforcement of COC prescription guidelines for healthcare professionals, further researches are needed to better understand differences in tolerability and acceptability in terms of quality of life of the several potential regimens.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Menstrual Cycle Quality of Life Contraceptives, Oral, Combined Contraceptives, Oral, Combined Female Habits Humans Menstruation

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-19T06:14:56.452680+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:23:57.700195+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine