How does nurse plant facilitation influence seed predation and recruitment in the living rock cactus Ariocarpus retusus?

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The most vulnerable stage in the plant life cycle is recruitment (seed germination and seedling survival), influenced by seed predation, herbivory, competition, and the availability of water, light, and nutrients. Nurse plants facilitate the recruitment of various species in arid environments. Therefore, we evaluated their effect on seed predation, germination, and seedling survival of Ariocarpus retusus through both field and controlled experiments. Seeds were attached to aphid mesh, and we monitored seed predation and germination at the study site under two factors: (1) microhabitat (presence or absence of a nurse plant) and (2) predator exclusion (with or without protection). Under controlled greenhouse conditions, we assessed germination and seedling survival using jiffy pots covered with shade mesh to simulate the presence of a nurse plant (artificial nurse). Seedlings obtained under these conditions were reintroduced into the field 15 months later to evaluate their survival. Natural nurse plants reduced seed predation, possibly by concealing seeds from predators; however, they did not offer the same protection to seedlings, which experienced high mortality due to herbivory. Although the artificial nurse favored both germination and seedling survival, natural nurse-plant facilitation is facultative, with A. retusus not strictly dependent on it for establishment. The differences observed in germination and survival between nurse types could be attributed to predator exclusion and constant watering in the artificial nurse treatment, highlighting the roles of water availability and herbivory in the recruitment of A. retusus.
Full text 2,800 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

The most vulnerable stage in the plant life cycle is recruitment (seed germination and seedling survival), influenced by seed predation, herbivory, competition, and the availability of water, light, and nutrients. Nurse plants facilitate the recruitment of various species in arid environments. Therefore, we evaluated their effect on seed predation, germination, and seedling survival of Ariocarpus retusus through both field and controlled experiments. Seeds were attached to aphid mesh, and we monitored seed predation and germination at the study site under two factors: (1) microhabitat (presence or absence of a nurse plant) and (2) predator exclusion (with or without protection). Under controlled greenhouse conditions, we assessed germination and seedling survival using jiffy pots covered with shade mesh to simulate the presence of a nurse plant (artificial nurse). Seedlings obtained under these conditions were reintroduced into the field 15 months later to evaluate their survival. Natural nurse plants reduced seed predation, possibly by concealing seeds from predators; however, they did not offer the same protection to seedlings, which experienced high mortality due to herbivory. Although the artificial nurse favored both germination and seedling survival, natural nurse-plant facilitation is facultative, with A. retusus not strictly dependent on it for establishment. The differences observed in germination and survival between nurse types could be attributed to predator exclusion and constant watering in the artificial nurse treatment, highlighting the roles of water availability and herbivory in the recruitment of A. retusus. Supplementary Material File (versión final_articulo granivoria.docx) - Download - 72.26 KB Information & Authors Information Version history Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License.

Keywords

Authors Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 172views 99downloads Citations Download citation Diana Cárdenas Ramos, Pedro Luis Valverde, Vinicio Sosa, et al. How does nurse plant facilitation influence seed predation and recruitment in the living rock cactus Ariocarpus retusus?. Authorea. 14 August 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175513876.60338960/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175513876.60338960/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00