Domain-specific Digital Twin Platforms: Concept, Evaluation Framework and Case Study

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract As digital twin (DT) applications continue to proliferate across diverse industries, a noticeable gap exists in the availability of evaluation methods or frameworks to aid in the selection and development of DT platforms, particularly for Domain-specific application. To address this gap, this paper proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework for DT platforms, with a focus on Domain-specific application. The framework uses the Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method (BWM-FCE) to assess the performance, user experience, and economic effects of DT platforms. The proposed framework is applied to a case study of a high-speed railway DT platform and compared with other evaluation methods (Analytic Hierarchy Process and Best-Worst Method-Set Pair Analysis). The results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed framework and highlight its potential for guiding the development and selection of DT platforms for Domain-specific applications.
Full text 12,165 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Domain-specific Digital Twin Platforms: Concept, Evaluation Framework and Case Study | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Domain-specific Digital Twin Platforms: Concept, Evaluation Framework and Case Study Zhao Tang, Dayuan Zhuang, Jianjun Zhang This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4392520/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 27 Mar, 2025 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted 11 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract As digital twin (DT) applications continue to proliferate across diverse industries, a noticeable gap exists in the availability of evaluation methods or frameworks to aid in the selection and development of DT platforms, particularly for Domain-specific application. To address this gap, this paper proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework for DT platforms, with a focus on Domain-specific application. The framework uses the Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method (BWM-FCE) to assess the performance, user experience, and economic effects of DT platforms. The proposed framework is applied to a case study of a high-speed railway DT platform and compared with other evaluation methods (Analytic Hierarchy Process and Best-Worst Method-Set Pair Analysis). The results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed framework and highlight its potential for guiding the development and selection of DT platforms for Domain-specific applications. Physical sciences/Engineering/Mechanical engineering Physical sciences/Mathematics and computing/Information technology Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 27 Mar, 2025 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 25 Aug, 2024 Reviews received at journal 23 Aug, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 14 Aug, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 10 Jul, 2024 Reviews received at journal 08 Jul, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 26 Jun, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 24 May, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 24 May, 2024 Editor invited by journal 12 May, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 12 May, 2024 First submitted to journal 09 May, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4392520","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":303962569,"identity":"53262b79-6027-40d0-bd0b-b592b8d2fa91","order_by":0,"name":"Zhao Tang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Southwest Jiaotong University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zhao","middleName":"","lastName":"Tang","suffix":""},{"id":303962570,"identity":"0313f7bc-b0c3-457c-844b-36e61af0ca37","order_by":1,"name":"Dayuan Zhuang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Southwest Jiaotong University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dayuan","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhuang","suffix":""},{"id":303962571,"identity":"5ebfa142-e138-4fbf-9b90-e419ed87c53d","order_by":2,"name":"Jianjun Zhang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Bournemouth University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jianjun","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhang","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-05-09 04:42:41","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4392520/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4392520/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82154-8","type":"published","date":"2025-03-27T15:57:03+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":79604787,"identity":"0523812a-e0a8-402e-8d2a-dac325756d9c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-31 16:05:16","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":3235112,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscriptnew.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4392520/v1_covered_c1cbd667-c112-436f-8545-c8ff40b0d5c6.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Domain-specific Digital Twin Platforms: Concept, Evaluation Framework and Case Study","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4392520/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4392520/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"As digital twin (DT) applications continue to proliferate across diverse industries, a noticeable gap exists in the availability of evaluation methods or frameworks to aid in the selection and development of DT platforms, particularly for Domain-specific application. To address this gap, this paper proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework for DT platforms, with a focus on Domain-specific application. The framework uses the Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method (BWM-FCE) to assess the performance, user experience, and economic effects of DT platforms. The proposed framework is applied to a case study of a high-speed railway DT platform and compared with other evaluation methods (Analytic Hierarchy Process and Best-Worst Method-Set Pair Analysis). The results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed framework and highlight its potential for guiding the development and selection of DT platforms for Domain-specific applications.","manuscriptTitle":"Domain-specific Digital Twin Platforms: Concept, Evaluation Framework and Case Study","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-05-21 11:06:51","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4392520/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2024-08-26T03:55:25+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-08-23T17:35:06+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"329635192089674833129016849337137672934","date":"2024-08-14T10:03:01+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"171704271931672760870200898125018965663","date":"2024-07-10T14:53:18+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-07-08T16:53:49+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"236464818367829717932170595287075993482","date":"2024-06-26T18:06:52+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-05-24T06:15:26+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-05-24T06:08:43+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2024-05-12T14:02:31+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-05-12T13:57:07+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2024-05-09T04:13:21+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"09d1e933-a908-471f-9a65-3bcca303ce0f","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 21st, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":32091260,"name":"Physical sciences/Engineering/Mechanical engineering"},{"id":32091261,"name":"Physical sciences/Mathematics and computing/Information technology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-03-31T15:58:58+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-4392520","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82154-8","journal":{"identity":"scientific-reports","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Scientific Reports"},"publishedOn":"2025-03-27 15:57:03","publishedOnDateReadable":"March 27th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-05-21 11:06:51","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41598-024-82154-8","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82154-8","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4392520","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4392520","identity":"rs-4392520","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00