Mapping the Neural Control of Force and Impedance of Wrist Movements Using Robotics and fMRI

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

While robots are becoming increasingly valuable tools in neurorehabilitation, our limited understanding of the brain's response during human-robot interaction tasks restricts advancements in training programs to restore neural pathways after injury. Co-contraction is characteristic of several neuromuscular disorders, such as stroke and cerebral palsy, and it is often targeted by assessments or rehabilitation programs. Despite its importance, the neural mechanisms underlying co-contraction remain poorly understood. To address this gap, this study investigates the neural substrates of muscle co-contraction via functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a dynamic motor task with an MR-compatible wrist robot. To establish suitable fMRI experimental conditions, we first conducted a behavioral study assessing muscle activity during a wrist-pointing task with four participants. Participants reached toward a target while experiencing four main perturbation conditions (no force, divergent force, constant force up, and constant force down), designed to elicit distinct force and impedance responses. Following this behavioral validation, five additional participants performed the wrist-pointing task during fMRI. Our results suggest localization of force and impedance control within the cortico-thalamic-cerebellar network. These findings provide new insights into the neural mechanisms of co-contraction, supporting the development of neurorehabilitation paradigms.
Full text 1,754 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract While robots are becoming increasingly valuable tools in neurorehabilitation, our limited understanding of the brain’s response during human-robot interaction tasks restricts advancements in training programs to restore neural pathways after injury. Co-contraction is characteristic of several neuro-muscular disorders, such as stroke and cerebral palsy, and it is often targeted by assessments or rehabilitation programs. Despite its importance, the neural mechanisms underlying co-contraction remain poorly understood. To address this gap, this study investigates the neural substrates of muscle co-contraction via functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a dynamic motor task with an MR-compatible wrist robot. To establish suitable fMRI experimental conditions, we first conducted a behavioral study assessing muscle activity during a wrist-pointing task with four participants. Participants reached toward a target while experiencing four main perturbation conditions (no force, divergent force, constant force up, and constant force down), designed to elicit distinct force and impedance responses. Following this behavioral validation, five additional participants performed the wrist-pointing task during fMRI. Our results suggest localization of force and impedance control within the cortico-thalamic-cerebellar network. These findings provide new insights into the neural mechanisms of co-contraction, supporting the development of neurorehabilitation paradigms. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes This work is supported by the National Science Foundation under Award 194712 and the University of Delaware Graduate College through the Doctoral Fellowship for Excellence.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00