Assessing Nile Delta Coastal Region shoreline dynamics to inform urban resilience planning

Assessing Nile Delta Coastal Region shoreline dynamics to inform urban resilience planning | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Assessing Nile Delta Coastal Region shoreline dynamics to inform urban resilience planning Taher Osman This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8007558/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The urbanized coast of the Nile Delta, a region of immense socio-economic importance, faces escalating threats from coastal erosion and accretion, driven by a confluence of anthropogenic pressures and climate change. This study presents an integrated, multi-method assessment of shoreline dynamics to analyze their implications for urban resilience. The research combines a high-resolution observational analysis of shoreline change using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery (2017–2022) with a process-based numerical model (LITPACK) to quantify the underlying drivers of littoral sediment transport and establish a regional sediment balance. Furthermore, future shoreline retreat is projected under IPCC RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios for near-term (2030–2040) and long-term (2050–2070) horizons. The findings reveal a complex pattern of coastal change, with a regional median erosion rate of − 0.8 m/year masking localized hotspots where erosion exceeds − 20 m/year. The numerical model quantifies the severe sediment deficit and transport gradients responsible for this erosion, particularly around the Rosetta and Damietta promontories, and validates these findings against observed shoreline changes. Projections indicate continued and potentially accelerated shoreline retreat, directly threatening critical urban infrastructure. The results demonstrate a critical disconnect between localized, hard-engineering adaptation strategies and the regional scale of the sediment deficit, which often exacerbates vulnerability in downdrift locations. This paper argues for a paradigm shift in coastal management, moving from a reactive, site-specific protection approach towards a proactive, integrated framework that prioritizes regional sediment management and nature-based solutions to build long-term socio-ecological resilience for the delta's urban centers. Earth and environmental sciences/Climate sciences Scientific community and society/Developing world Earth and environmental sciences/Environmental sciences Social science/Environmental studies Scientific community and society/Geography Social science/Geography Earth and environmental sciences/Natural hazards Urban Resilience Coastal Erosion Nile Delta Sediment Management Remote Sensing Numerical Modeling Climate Adaptation Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 1. Introduction River deltas represent some of the most productive and dynamic landscapes on Earth. As critical interfaces between terrestrial and marine systems, they host immense biodiversity, support fertile agricultural lands, and are hubs of global commerce and population (Bianchi and Allison, 2009 ; Nienhuis et al., 2020 ; Macklin et al., 2013 ). Nearly half a billion people reside in deltaic regions, which are characterized by their low-lying topography and rich natural resources (Nienhuis et al., 2020 ). However, these vital socio-ecological systems are facing a global predicament, increasingly recognized as a "triple threat" that jeopardizes their long-term viability. First, anthropogenic alterations to river basins, most notably the construction of upstream dams, have drastically reduced the fluvial sediment supply that is essential for maintaining deltaic landmass against natural subsidence (Bianchi and Allison, 2009 ; Stanley and Warne, 1994 ; Williams et al., 2018 ). Second, this sediment starvation is compounded by accelerated relative sea-level rise (RSLR), a combination of eustatic sea-level rise driven by global warming and localized land subsidence from sediment compaction and groundwater extraction (IPCC, 2019 ; Sweet et al., 2022 ; Allison et al., 2021 ). Third, intensifying urbanization and agricultural development lead to "coastal squeeze," where natural coastal habitats are trapped between rising seas and fixed inland infrastructure, eliminating their capacity to adapt naturally (Agrawala et al., 2004 ; De Graaf-van Dinther, 2021). This convergence of pressures has pushed many of the world's major deltas, including the Mekong, Mississippi, and Indus, into a state of crisis, characterized by land loss, increased flood risk, and shoreline retreat (Bianchi and Allison, 2009 ; Nienhuis et al., 2020 ; IPCC, 2022 ). The Nile Delta stands as a stark paradigm of this global challenge. It is one of the world's most anciently settled and intensely modified deltaic systems, and it is now considered among the most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and human intervention (Agrawala et al., 2004 ; Sestini, 1992 ; Stanley, 1988 ; IPCC, 2022 ). Historically, the annual flooding of the Nile River deposited vast quantities of nutrient-rich sediment, building and sustaining the delta for millennia (Nienhuis et al., 2020 ; Macklin et al., 2013 ). This natural process was abruptly terminated following the completion of the Aswan High Dam in 1970. The dam, while providing critical benefits such as flood control and hydroelectric power, trapped over 90% of the Nile's sediment load in Lake Nasser, effectively starving the delta of its lifeblood (Ali and El-Magd, 2016 ; Stanley, 1988 ; Sestini, 1992 ). This sudden shift from an accretional to an erosional regime initiated a phase of widespread coastal retreat and disequilibrium that continues to this day (Darwish et al., 2017 ). The socio-economic stakes of this transformation are immense. The Nile Delta, comprising just 2.3% of Egypt's land area, is home to nearly half of its population and is the nation's agricultural heartland and industrial engine (Agrawala et al., 2004 ; Abdrabo and Hassaan, 2015 ; Sestini, 1992 ). Major urban centers, including the metropolis of Alexandria and the port cities of Damietta and Port Said, are situated directly on this vulnerable coastline, concentrating critical infrastructure and economic assets in areas of high physical risk (Darwish et al., 2017 ). Projections of RSLR, combining global sea-level rise with local subsidence rates of up to 8 mm/year in some areas, suggest that a significant portion of the delta could be inundated by the end of the century, displacing millions of people and threatening trillions of dollars in economic value (Agrawala et al., 2004 ; Becker and Sultan, 2009 ; Sestini, 1992 ). In response to these threats, coastal management in the Nile Delta has historically followed a "coastal protection" paradigm, characterized by the deployment of hard-engineering structures such as seawalls, revetments, groins, and breakwaters at specific erosion hotspots (Eldeberky, 2011 ; Williams et al., 2018 ; El-Asmar and Taha, 2022 ). While these interventions can provide localized, short-term stability, they often fail to address the root cause of the problem—the regional sediment deficit—and can trigger unintended negative consequences, such as accelerated erosion in adjacent, downdrift areas (Ali and El-Magd, 2016 ). This fragmented approach highlights the limitations of a purely engineering-focused framework and underscores the need for a more holistic and integrated perspective. This paper adopts an "urban resilience" framework to re-examine the challenge of coastal change in the Nile Delta. Urban resilience is defined not merely as the ability to resist shocks, but as the capacity of complex urban systems—encompassing their social, economic, ecological, and physical components—to absorb disturbances, reorganize while retaining essential functions, and adapt and transform in the face of chronic stresses and acute events (Holling, 1973 ; Folke et al., 2002 ; Bruneau et al., 2003 ; Adger et al., 2005 ). Within this framework, shoreline dynamics are not viewed as an isolated physical problem but as a critical driver of urban vulnerability. Persistent erosion directly threatens urban resilience by undermining critical infrastructure (roads, ports, power plants), degrading economic livelihoods (agriculture, fisheries, tourism), and increasing the social vulnerability of coastal communities to flooding and storm surges (Ali and El-Magd, 2016 ; Darwish et al., 2017 ; Leichenko, 2011 ; Kirshen, Ruth and Anderson, 2008 ). The response to this erosion is itself a critical component of the system. A sequence of poorly planned, localized interventions can create a negative feedback loop, where solving one problem creates another, progressively undermining the resilience of the entire coastal system. This process is evident in the Nile Delta, where the initial shock of the Aswan Dam has been followed by decades of urban expansion into vulnerable areas and the implementation of fragmented coastal defenses that disrupt natural sediment pathways, ultimately amplifying risk across the region. While the general vulnerability of the Nile Delta is well-established in the scientific literature, there remains a critical gap in high-resolution, spatiotemporally explicit analyses that quantitatively link shoreline dynamics to the efficacy of current management strategies and the broader goals of urban resilience. Many existing studies rely on decadal-scale analyses with limited spatial detail, which can obscure the highly localized and rapid nature of coastal change. This study aims to fill this gap by providing a robust, up-to-date quantitative assessment of erosion and accretion hotspots using a dense time-series of high-resolution satellite imagery. The novel contribution of this paper is threefold: first, it delivers a detailed, quantitative baseline of recent shoreline change rates (2017–2022) across the entire delta at a 200 m spatial interval, identifying and quantifying the most extreme erosion and accretion hotspots. Second, it critically evaluates the spatial relationship between these hotspots, patterns of urban development, and the location of hard-engineering interventions, providing empirical evidence of maladaptive outcomes. Third, based on this evidence, it proposes a conceptual shift towards a resilience-based framework for coastal management in the Nile Delta, advocating for integrated sediment management and adaptive governance as pathways to a more sustainable urban future. 2. Methods and Data 2.1 Study Area: The Urbanized Coast of the Nile Delta The study area encompasses the entire Mediterranean coastline of the Nile Delta (Fig. 1 ), a classic arcuate delta extending approximately 270 km from Alexandria in the west to Port Said in the east. This coastal zone is characterized by a low-lying, gently sloping coastal plain, with large portions lying less than 2 m above mean sea level (Darwish et al., 2017 ; Sestini, 1992 ). Key morphological features include the two main active river promontories at Rosetta and Damietta, extensive coastal lagoons (Idku, Burullus, and Manzala) separated from the sea by narrow sand barriers, and a series of sandy beaches interspersed with rocky headlands, particularly in the western sector (Ali and El-Magd, 2016 ). The region is densely populated and heavily developed, hosting major urban centers such as Alexandria, Rosetta, Damietta, and Port Said, alongside intensive agricultural lands that rely on a complex network of irrigation canals and drains (Agrawala et al., 2004 ; Williams et al., 2018 ). For analytical purposes, the coastline was segmented into distinct Coastal Units (CUs) and sub-cells based on established geomorphological and hydrodynamic characteristics, allowing for a structured assessment of regional variability in shoreline dynamics. 2.2 Observational Analysis of Shoreline Change 2.2.1 Data Acquisition and Pre-processing To capture recent shoreline dynamics with high spatiotemporal fidelity, this study utilized a comprehensive dataset derived from the European Space Agency's (ESA) Sentinel-2 mission. The dataset comprises Level-1C products from the twin Sentinel-2A and Sentinel-2B satellites, downloaded from the ESA SciHub portal. These satellites provide multispectral imagery with a high temporal resolution (a combined 5-day revisit period) and a spatial resolution of 10 m in the visible and near-infrared (NIR) bands, which is ideal for detailed shoreline mapping. The temporal scope of the analysis spans a five-year period from January 4, 2017, to January 18, 2022 Due to the data availability in the study area. This period was selected to provide a contemporary baseline of coastal dynamics, reflecting the interplay of current environmental drivers and management interventions. The pre-processing workflow involved several key steps. First, all available images within the study period were screened, and only those with less than 20% cloud cover over the coastal zone were selected for further processing to ensure high data quality. These selected images then underwent atmospheric correction to convert top-of-atmosphere reflectance values to surface reflectance. The entire study area was covered by mosaicking four adjacent Sentinel-2 tiles (100×100 km) for each acquisition date. 2.2.2 Automated Shoreline Extraction A robust and repeatable methodology was employed for the automated extraction of the land-water interface from the pre-processed satellite imagery. This approach is critical for efficiently handling the large volume of data in the time-series analysis. The core of the method is the calculation of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), a spectral index that maximizes the contrast between open water bodies and terrestrial features. The NDWI is calculated using the green and NIR bands as follows: NDWI= (Green + NIR)(Green − NIR)​ The resulting grayscale NDWI images, where water features have high positive values, were then subjected to an automated thresholding procedure. The Otsu method, a well-established algorithm in image processing, was applied to each NDWI image. This method automatically determines an optimal threshold value to segment the image into two classes (land and water) by minimizing the intra-class variance. The resulting binary raster was then converted into a vector polyline, representing the extracted shoreline for that specific date. This automated workflow minimizes subjective operator bias and ensures consistency across the entire time series, although minor inaccuracies can arise from transient features like breaking waves or unmasked clouds. The reliance on a large number of extracted shorelines, however, helps to minimize the impact of such individual errors on the final trend analysis. 2.2.3 Shoreline Change Analysis using DSAS Quantitative analysis of shoreline change was conducted using the Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) version 5.0, a widely used software extension for Esri ArcGIS developed by the U.S. Geological Survey (Thieler et al., 2017 ; NIRAS, 2022 ). DSAS provides a standardized statistical framework for calculating rates of change from a time series of shoreline positions. The analytical process involved three main steps. First, a continuous baseline was digitized offshore, roughly parallel to the general trend of the shoreline series. Second, DSAS was used to automatically cast perpendicular transects from this baseline toward the shore at a regular interval of 200 m along the entire delta coastline. This high density of transects ensures a detailed spatial analysis of shoreline behavior. Third, the software calculated the intersection points of each transect with the multiple vector shorelines, generating a time series of shoreline positions for each of the thousands of transects. From these intersection data, several statistical metrics were computed to quantify the rate and magnitude of shoreline change. The primary metric used in this study is the Linear Regression Rate (LRR). The LRR is determined by fitting a least-squares regression line to all available shoreline positions for a given transect over the study period. The slope of this line represents the average annual rate of change (in meters per year) and is considered a robust indicator of the long-term trend as it utilizes all available data points (Dolan, Fenster and Holme, 1991 ; Genz et al., 2007 ; NIRAS, 2022 ). To assess the statistical robustness of the LRR, the Coefficient of Determination ( LR 2) was also calculated for each transect. The LR 2 value, ranging from 0.0 to 1.0, indicates the proportion of variance in the shoreline positions that is explained by the linear regression model. A high LR 2 value suggests a strong, consistent linear trend, while a low value indicates that the linear trend is small relative to other sources of variability, such as seasonal fluctuations or measurement noise. Other metrics, including the End Point Rate (EPR), which calculates the rate based only on the oldest and newest shorelines, and the Shoreline Change Envelope (SCE), which measures the total distance between the most landward and seaward shorelines, were also calculated for comparative purposes. 2.3 Methodological Uncertainty The accuracy of satellite-derived shoreline analysis is subject to several sources of uncertainty. These can be broadly categorized as positioning errors, which relate to physical phenomena, and measurement errors, which relate to data processing. Positioning errors include transient effects such as tidal variations and wave run-up, which can alter the water line at the time of image acquisition. Measurement errors include image resolution, orthorectification errors, and potential inaccuracies during the automated shoreline digitization process. While DSAS allows for the statistical quantification of some of these uncertainties, this study primarily uses the Coefficient of Determination ( LR 2) as an indicator of the robustness of the calculated trend. A low LR 2 value signifies that the multi-year linear trend is small compared to other sources of variability, including seasonal cycles and the aforementioned uncertainties. 2.4 Process-Based Morphodynamic Analysis 2.4.1 Coastal Classification and Characterization To provide a geomorphological and hydrodynamic context for the observed shoreline changes, a coastal classification system was employed. DHI's coastal classification system characterizes sandy coastlines based on two primary parameters: the angle of wave incidence relative to the shore-normal orientation and the level of wave exposure. The angle of incidence is categorized into five classes, from perpendicular (Type 1) to nearly coast-parallel (Type 5), while wave exposure is categorized as Protected (P), Moderately exposed (M), or Exposed (E) based on the significant wave height exceeded 12 hours per year. This classification is critical for understanding inherent coastal stability; for instance, coastlines with a very oblique wave approach (Type 4E) are prone to instabilities that manifest as large-scale sand spits, a feature observed along the eastern Nile Delta. 2.4.2 Numerical Modeling of Littoral Transport To move beyond a descriptive analysis and explain the physical drivers of erosion and accretion, this study utilized DHI's LITPACK numerical modeling system. LITPACK is an integrated modeling suite that simulates non-cohesive sediment transport along quasi-uniform coastlines. The model resolves wave propagation and breaking in the surf zone, calculates wave-generated longshore currents, and quantifies the resulting littoral sediment transport. Model simulations were conducted along representative cross-shore profiles for each sub-cell, using nearshore wave conditions derived from a hindcast study as boundary conditions. Based on an analysis of available sediment data, which showed considerable scatter, a constant mean grain size (D50) of 0.3 mm was used along the entire coastline to ensure consistency in the regional model. The model outputs provide quantitative estimates of the annual net and gross littoral drift (in m³/year), allowing for the establishment of a coastal sediment balance and the identification of transport gradients that drive erosion and accretion. 2.5 Future Scenario Projections To provide a forward-looking assessment of coastal risk, this study incorporated projections of future shoreline retreat based on climate change scenarios. The analysis utilized two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs): RCP4.5, representing a moderate greenhouse gas emissions scenario, and RCP8.5, representing a high-emissions pathway. Shoreline retreat was calculated for a near-term (2030–2040) and a long-term (2050–2070) horizon, relative to a 1986–2005 baseline. The shoreline retreat calculations are based on the Bruun rule concept, which relates shoreline retreat to sea-level rise, considering the active beach profile and closure depth, which is in turn influenced by projected changes in wave heights. Table 1 Methodological Framework Summary Parameter Specification Data Source Data Source ESA Sentinel-2A & 2B Multispectral Instrument (MSI) (ICZM Numerical Model Report, 2024 ) Temporal Coverage 4 January 2017–18 January 2022 Spatial Resolution 10 m (Bands 2, 3, 4, 8 used for NDWI) Shoreline Extraction Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) with Otsu automated thresholding Analysis Software Esri ArcGIS with USGS Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) v5.0 (Thieler et al., 2017 ; NIRAS, 2022 ) Transect Spacing 200 m Primary Change Metric Linear Regression Rate (LRR) (m/year) (Dolan, Fenster and Holme, 1991 ; NIRAS, 2022 ) Uncertainty Metric Coefficient of Determination ( LR 2) Numerical Model DHI LITPACK (ICZM Numerical Model Report, 2024 ) Sediment Size (D50) 0.3 mm (assumed constant) Future Scenarios RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 (2030–2040 and 2050–2070) 3. Results 3.1 Observational Analysis of Shoreline Change (2017–2022) 3.1.1 Regional Overview of Shoreline Dynamics The analysis of shoreline change across the entire Nile Delta from 2017 to 2022 reveals a coastline in a state of significant flux, characterized by a dominant, yet highly variable, erosional trend (Fig. 2 ). The overall median Linear Regression Rate (LRR) for the entire study area was calculated to be − 0.8 m/year, indicating a net landward retreat of the shoreline. However, this regional median masks profound spatial heterogeneity. The mean LRR of + 0.6 m/year and a large standard deviation of 27.5 underscore the presence of extreme local variations, with areas of intense erosion being counterbalanced by zones of significant accretion. Figure 1 provides a spatial visualization of these dynamics, illustrating a mosaic of coastal change where stable or accreting segments are punctuated by severe erosion hotspots. A notable finding is that many transects exhibit low LR 2 values, suggesting that in many areas, the multi-year linear trend is smaller than the inherent seasonal or cyclical variability of the shoreline. Conversely, the highest rates of both erosion and accretion are often associated with areas of anthropogenic intervention, such as the construction of harbors and coastal protection structures, where changes are more pronounced and unidirectional. 3.1.2 Heterogeneity across Coastal Units (CUs) Disaggregating the results by the predefined Coastal Units (CUs) provides a clearer picture of the regional variability in shoreline behavior (Table 2 ). The analysis demonstrates that the coastal dynamics are far from uniform, with distinct patterns emerging in different geomorphological settings. For instance, some sub-cells, such as CU2-SUB1 (Alexandria), show a near-stable or slightly accretional median LRR of + 0.09 m/year, likely influenced by extensive coastal engineering and urban development. In stark contrast, the coastal units encompassing the historic river promontories exhibit alarming rates of erosion. CU3-SUB2, which includes the Rosetta promontory, stands out as the most erosional sub-cell, with a median LRR of − 3.63 m/year and a relatively high median LR 2 of 0.21, indicating a strong and consistent erosional trend. Similarly, sub-cells CU4-SUB2 and CU4-SUB3, located around the Damietta promontory, also show significant median erosion rates of − 2.66 m/year and − 2.85 m/year, respectively. This quantitative comparison confirms that the delta's promontories, once the primary zones of sediment deposition and land building, have now become the epicenters of coastal retreat. Table 2 Regional Shoreline Change Rates (2017–2022) for Nile Delta Coastal Units Subarea Median LRR (m/year) Median LR 2 Number of Transects CU1-SUB-6 -0.44 0.06 149 CU2-SUB-1 + 0.09 0.03 496 CU3-SUB-1 + 0.08 0.09 296 CU3-SUB-2 -3.63 0.21 348 CU3-SUB-3 -2.08 0.17 292 CU4-SUB-1 -0.40 0.22 97 CU4-SUB-2 -2.66 0.05 118 CU4-SUB-3 -2.85 0.16 237 CU5-SUB-1 -0.80 0.21 254 CU6-SUB-1 -1.50 0.17 306 3.2 Analysis of Extreme Erosion and Accretion Hotspots Zooming in on specific "detailed areas" within the highly dynamic CUs reveals catastrophic rates of change that are orders of magnitude greater than the regional average (Table 3 ). These hotspots represent critical points of failure in the coastal system and are often directly linked to either the natural process of deltaic lobe erosion or the localized impacts of human structures. The Rosetta Promontory (CU3-SUB2) is the most severely eroding region. Within this sub-cell, Detailed Area 18 exhibits a staggering median LRR of − 15.66 m/year. The exceptionally high median LR 2 of 0.72 confirms that this is not a transient fluctuation but a powerful, persistent erosional trend, representing the rapid dismantling of the historic delta lobe in the absence of sediment replenishment from the Nile. The area around the Burullus Lagoon outlet (CU3-SUB3) is also highly dynamic, with pockets of extreme erosion. Detailed Area 40, for example, displays a median LRR of − 21.72 m/year, one of the highest rates recorded in the entire delta. This intense erosion highlights the vulnerability of the narrow sand barriers that protect the vital lagoon ecosystems. The Damietta Promontory (CU4-SUB2 and CU4-SUB3) shows a complex pattern of erosion and accretion heavily influenced by engineering works. In CU4-SUB2, Detailed Area 54, located immediately downdrift (east) of a series of large T-shaped groins, is eroding at a median rate of − 6.67 m/year. This provides clear quantitative evidence of downdrift erosion caused by coastal protection structures that interrupt the natural longshore sediment transport. Further east, the large sandspit at the mouth of the Damietta branch (CU4-SUB3) exhibits extreme volatility, with annual changes in area fluctuating between net erosion of over 300,000 m 2 and net accretion of over 450,000 m 2 in consecutive years, illustrating its highly unstable nature . Conversely, areas of major anthropogenic intervention also create hotspots of accretion. Near the Suez Canal entrance (CU5-SUB1), recent changes to the harbor layout and the construction of new groins have induced rapid accretion in Detailed Area 67. This accretion, however, comes at a direct cost to the adjacent coastline. Just to the west, Detailed Area 60 is experiencing catastrophic erosion with a median LRR of − 18.33 m/year and a near-perfect LR 2 of 0.86, demonstrating a direct and immediate link between the updrift accretion caused by the structures and severe downdrift sediment starvation. This pattern quantitatively confirms that many hard-engineering "solutions" do not solve erosion but merely redistribute it, often intensifying the problem in a new location. Table 3 Analysis of Extreme Erosion and Accretion Hotspots (2017–2022) Subarea Median LRR (m/year) Median LR 2 Primary Driver/Observation CU3-SUB-2 -15.66 0.72 Extreme erosion of the Rosetta promontory CU3-SUB-3 -12.21 0.51 Significant erosion west of Burullus outlet CU3-SUB-3 -21.72 0.54 Catastrophic erosion near Burullus outlet CU4-SUB-2 -8.43 0.19 High erosion west of Damietta promontory CU4-SUB-2 -6.67 0.46 Downdrift erosion caused by coastal groins CU5-SUB-1 -18.33 0.86 Severe downdrift erosion west of Port Said 3.3 Modeled Sediment Dynamics and Model Validation The numerical modeling results provide a process-based explanation for the observed shoreline changes by quantifying the littoral drift and establishing a coastal sediment balance. The model shows a clear divergence of sediment transport around the Nile's promontories. West of the Rosetta mouth (in CU3-1), the potential net littoral transport is directed westward at a rate of approximately 180,000 m³/year, while east of the mouth (in CU3-2), it is directed eastward at a rate of around 200,000 m³/year. This divergence, in the absence of fluvial sediment supply, creates a significant sediment deficit and drives the chronic erosion observed in the satellite data. Similarly, east of the Damietta mouth (in CU4-3), the model calculates a net eastward transport of approximately 370,000 m³/year, explaining the severe erosion at the base of the Damietta spit. The model's outputs were validated against observed shoreline changes. For example, in the area west of Rosetta (CU3-1), the total volume of sand eroded between 2003 and 2023, as estimated from satellite imagery, corresponds to an average sediment loss of approximately 190,000 m³/year. This figure shows strong agreement with the modeled potential transport rate of 180,000 m³/year for the same area, lending high confidence to the model's ability to represent the dominant coastal processes. 3.4 Projected Future Shoreline Retreat Projections of future shoreline retreat under different climate scenarios highlight the escalating risk to the delta's urbanized coast. The analysis indicates that shoreline retreat is expected to continue and likely accelerate, particularly under the high-emissions RCP8.5 scenario. For the long-term horizon (2050–2070), projections show expected shoreline retreat of several tens of meters across many parts of the delta, with the most vulnerable sandy coastlines potentially retreating by over 100 meters. These projections underscore the long-term unsustainability of current coastal configurations and the increasing threat to coastal infrastructure, agriculture, and urban settlements. 4. Discussion 4.1 The Legacy of Sediment Starvation and the Modern Drivers of Change The quantitative results presented in this study provide a high-resolution snapshot of a coastal system in profound disequilibrium. The foundational driver of this instability is the regional sediment deficit initiated by the construction of the Aswan High Dam in the mid-twentieth century (Stanley, 1988 ; Ali and El-Magd, 2016 ; Darwish et al., 2017 ). By trapping virtually all of the Nile's sediment load, the dam transformed the delta from a prograding, river-dominated system into a retreating, wave-dominated one (Agrawala et al., 2004 ). The extreme erosion rates observed at the Rosetta and Damietta promontories (− 15.66 m/year and − 6.67 m/year in hotspots, respectively) are a direct manifestation of this legacy. These promontories, which were the primary depocenters for millennia, are now being actively eroded by marine forces. In the absence of new fluvial sediment, the coastal system is effectively cannibalizing its own landmass; wave energy erodes the most exposed and historically sediment-rich deltaic lobes to supply the longshore transport system. This pre-existing vulnerability is now being amplified by the accelerating impacts of global climate change. Rising global sea levels, combined with significant local land subsidence due to sediment compaction and groundwater extraction, are causing an accelerated rate of relative sea-level rise (RSLR) across the delta (Agrawala et al., 2004 ; Becker and Sultan, 2009 ; Darwish et al., 2017 ; IPCC, 2022 ). This RSLR increases water depths in the nearshore zone, allowing more powerful waves to reach the coast, and permanently inundates the lowest-lying areas, exacerbating the erosional pressure on the shoreline. The littoral drift, driven by the prevailing northwesterly wave climate, acts as the relentless conveyor belt in this system, transporting the limited available sediment eastward and ensuring that eroded material is permanently lost from the hotspots. 4.2 Coastal Squeeze and the Maladaptation of Urban Development The physical processes of erosion and sediment transport are unfolding in a landscape of intense and expanding urbanization, creating a classic "coastal squeeze" scenario (Agrawala et al., 2004 ). As the natural shoreline retreats landward, it encounters an increasingly rigid line of human development, including cities, agricultural lands, and critical infrastructure like the international coastal highway (Darwish et al., 2017 ; Sestini, 1992 ; Williams et al., 2018 ). This dynamic places immense pressure on urban systems and has prompted a widespread response based on a paradigm of "holding the line" through the construction of hard-engineering defenses (Eldeberky, 2011 ; Williams et al., 2018 ; El-Asmar and Taha, 2022 ). However, the results of this study strongly suggest that this approach often constitutes a form of maladaptation—an action taken to reduce vulnerability that inadvertently increases it in the long term or shifts it to other locations. The stark contrast between accretion updrift of structures and catastrophic erosion downdrift, as quantified in areas like CU4-SUB2 and CU5-SUB1, provides compelling evidence for this phenomenon. The construction of a groin or breakwater to protect a specific resort or section of a city creates a sediment trap, interrupting the natural longshore transport system (Ali and El-Magd, 2016 ). While this may stabilize the shoreline locally, it starves the downdrift coast of its sediment supply, triggering or accelerating erosion there. This leads to a domino effect, where the community newly affected by erosion is then compelled to build its own protective structures, propagating the problem further along the coast. This cycle reflects a profound "scale mismatch" in governance: the problem of sediment deficit is regional, spanning the entire delta, yet the responses are hyper-local, uncoordinated, and competitive. This mismatch ensures the long-term failure of current strategies, perpetuating a cycle of environmental degradation and systematically redistributing risk rather than reducing it. 4.3 Conceptualizing Resilience: From Hard Defenses to Socio-Ecological Integration Achieving long-term urban resilience in the Nile Delta requires a fundamental shift away from the failing paradigm of localized, hard protection toward a holistic, socio-ecological systems approach (Gunderson and Holling, 2002 ; Adger et al., 2005 ). True resilience cannot be built by erecting ever-higher concrete walls against natural processes; it must be cultivated by working with these processes to restore a more balanced and sustainable coastal system (Leichenko, 2011 ; Kirshen, Ruth and Anderson, 2008 ). This requires a multi-pronged strategy that addresses the root causes of vulnerability and embraces a broader portfolio of adaptation options. First, an Integrated Sediment Management strategy is paramount. This involves treating sediment not as a nuisance to be dredged and disposed of, but as a vital natural resource for coastal defense. This could involve feasibility studies for engineering solutions to bypass a fraction of the sediment trapped behind the Aswan High Dam or, more pragmatically, the sustainable mining of offshore sand deposits—remnants of the ancient Nile fan—for large-scale, strategic beach nourishment programs (Eldeberky, 2011 ). Second, there is a need to prioritize Nature-Based Solutions (NbS). The restoration and protection of natural coastal features like sand dunes and wetlands can provide effective and adaptive buffers against storm surge and erosion, while also delivering co-benefits such as habitat preservation and carbon sequestration (Leichenko, 2011 ; Williams et al., 2018 ; De Graaf-van Dinther, 2021). Projects like the construction of sand dikes stabilized with native vegetation represent a step in this direction, offering a lower-cost, more environmentally integrated alternative to hard structures (Williams et al., 2018 ). Finally, these physical interventions must be embedded within a framework of Adaptive Governance and Planning. This requires the development and stringent enforcement of a national Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) plan for the entire North Coast (Abdrabo and Hassaan, 2015 ). Such a plan should be informed by scientific evidence, like that presented in this study, to establish legally binding setback zones that restrict new development in high-erosion areas. It must also strengthen inter-agency coordination among the ministries responsible for water resources, environment, and urban planning to overcome the fragmented, project-by-project decision-making that currently prevails (Agrawala et al., 2004 ). By managing the coast as a single, interconnected system, such a governance framework can begin to break the cycle of maladaptation and steer the Nile Delta toward a more resilient and sustainable future. 5. Conclusion This study has provided a high-resolution, quantitative assessment of contemporary shoreline dynamics across the urbanized Nile Delta, revealing a system under severe stress. The primary findings are threefold. First, the delta is experiencing a net erosional trend, with a regional median shoreline retreat of − 0.8 m/year between 2017 and 2022. Second, this regional average conceals a pattern of extreme spatial heterogeneity, with catastrophic erosion hotspots—particularly at the Rosetta and Damietta promontories—experiencing retreat rates exceeding − 20 m/year. Third, these hotspots of extreme change are strongly correlated with anthropogenic factors: the foundational driver is the basin-scale sediment deficit caused by the Aswan High Dam, while the most intense local gradients of erosion and accretion are directly linked to the proliferation of hard-engineering coastal structures. These findings collectively demonstrate that the current coastal management paradigm, which relies on fragmented, localized protection, is often maladaptive, redistributing risk and exacerbating erosion in adjacent areas rather than building systemic resilience. The evidence presented in this paper points toward the urgent need for a strategic reorientation of coastal management in Egypt. To move from a cycle of reactive crisis management to a proactive strategy of building long-term urban resilience, the following policy and planning actions are recommended: Adopt an Integrated Sediment Management Strategy: The Government of Egypt should elevate sediment management to a national strategic priority. This requires treating sediment as a finite and valuable resource for coastal defense. A national-level task force should be commissioned to conduct feasibility studies on innovative solutions to address the sediment deficit, including the potential for sediment bypassing around upstream dams and the sustainable exploitation of offshore sand deposits for large-scale, strategically planned beach nourishment projects (Eldeberky, 2011 ). Implement and Enforce a Climate-Resilient Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) Plan: The development of a national ICZM plan is a critical step that must be followed by robust implementation and enforcement (Abdrabo and Hassaan, 2015 ). This plan must be legally empowered to establish and enforce science-based coastal setback lines to guide future urban development away from high-risk zones. It should also mandate a shift in preference from hard structures to nature-based solutions where ecologically and economically viable, and require comprehensive environmental impact assessments for any new coastal project that considers its effect on the entire coastal sediment cell, not just the immediate vicinity. Strengthen Governance and Institutional Capacity: Effective coastal management requires overcoming institutional fragmentation. This involves strengthening coordination mechanisms between key government bodies, such as the Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation, the Ministry of Environment, and the General Organization for Physical Planning (Agrawala et al., 2004 ). Empowering a single lead agency with the authority and resources to oversee the implementation of the ICZM plan and manage the coastline as an integrated system is essential to break the current cycle of uncoordinated, and often counterproductive, local interventions. While this study provides a crucial baseline, charting a resilient future for the Nile Delta requires ongoing research to address remaining knowledge gaps. Future research should prioritize three key areas: Coupled Socio-Ecological Modeling There is a need for integrated assessment models that couple coastal morphodynamic projections with socio-economic vulnerability data. Such models would allow for a more nuanced understanding of the cascading impacts of shoreline change on urban infrastructure, agricultural productivity, livelihoods, and population displacement, enabling more targeted and equitable adaptation planning. Comparative Analysis of Adaptation Pathways Rigorous, long-term cost-benefit analyses are needed to compare the full life-cycle costs (economic, social, and environmental) of different adaptation pathways. These studies should compare traditional hard protection against nature-based solutions, nourishment strategies, and options for managed retreat or relocation in the most vulnerable areas to inform evidence-based investment decisions. Governance and Social Science Research Technical solutions alone are insufficient. Future research must investigate the social and political barriers to implementing integrated and adaptive management. This includes studying community perceptions of risk, understanding the political economy of coastal development decisions, and identifying governance models that can foster collaboration, ensure equity, and facilitate the societal transformations necessary for long-term resilience in the face of profound environmental change (Sestini, 1992 ; Leichenko, 2011 ). Declarations Ethics Statement This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author. Competing Interests The author declares no competing interests. Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Author Contributions T.O. is the sole author of this work and was responsible for the conception, design, analysis, interpretation, and writing of the manuscript. Acknowledgements Not applicable. Data Availability The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the author on reasonable request. Consent to Participate Not applicable. Consent for Publication Not applicable. References Abdrabo, M.A. and Hassaan, M.A. (2015) ‘An integrated framework for urban resilience to climate change - Case study: Sea level rise impacts on the Nile Delta coastal urban areas’, Urban Climate , 14, pp. 554–565. Adger, W.N., Hughes, T.P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S.R. and Rockström, J. (2005) ‘Social-Ecological Resilience to Coastal Disasters’, Science , 309(5737), pp. 1036–1039. Agrawala, S., et al. (2004) Development and Climate Change in Egypt: Focus on Coastal Resources and the Nile . Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Alberti, M., et al. (2003) ‘The Impact of Urban Patterns on Ecosystem Function’, Urban Ecosystems , 7(3), pp. 241–265. Ali, E.M. and El-Magd, I.A. (2016) ‘Impact of human interventions and coastal processes along the Nile Delta coast, Egypt during the past twenty-five years’, Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research , 42(1), pp. 1–10. Allison, I., et al. (2021) The Cryosphere in a Changing Climate . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Andersson, E. (2006) ‘Urban landscapes and sustainable cities’, Ecology and Society , 11(1), art29. Antrobus, G.G. (2007) ‘Resilience and vulnerability in a small, coastal, rural community’, Journal of Rural and Community Development , 2(2), pp. 1-20. Battjes, J.A. and Janssen, J.P.F.M. (1978) ‘Energy Loss and Set-Up due to Breaking of Random Waves’, in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Coastal Engineering . Hamburg, Germany: ASCE, pp. 569–587. Becker, R.H. and Sultan, M. (2009) ‘Land subsidence in the Nile Delta: Inferences from radar interferometry’, The Holocene , 19(6), pp. 949–954. Bianchi, T.S. and Allison, M.A. (2009) ‘Large-river delta-front estuaries as natural “recorders” of global environmental change’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 106(20), pp. 8085–8092. Bruneau, M., et al. (2003) ‘A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities’, Earthquake Spectra , 19(4), pp. 733–752. Chachavalpongpun, P. (2011) ‘Thailand’s 2011 Floods: A Turning Point for the Country?’, Southeast Asian Affairs , 2012, pp. 325–343. Darwish, M., et al. (2017) ‘Assessment of shoreline changes along the Nile Delta coast, Egypt’, Journal of Coastal Conservation , 21(4), pp. 547–560. De Graaf-van Dinther, R. (2021) Climate Resilient Urban Areas: Governance, Design and Development in Coastal Delta Cities . Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Dolan, R., Fenster, M.S. and Holme, S.J. (1991) ‘Temporal analysis of shoreline recession and accretion’, Journal of Coastal Research , 7(3), pp. 723–744. El-Asmar, H.M. and Taha, M.M.N. (2022) ‘Monitoring Coastal Changes and Assessing Protection Structures at the Damietta Promontory, Nile Delta, Egypt, to Secure Sustainability in the Context of Climate Changes’, Sustainability , 14(22), p. 15415. Eldeberky, Y. (2011) ‘Coastal adaptation to sea level rise along the Nile delta, Egypt’, in Coastal Processes II . WIT Press, pp. 41–52. Elfrink, B., et al. (2003) ‘Stability of a straight sandy coast with a dominant oblique wave climate’, in Coastal Sediments '03 . Clearwater Beach, Florida: World Scientific, pp. 1–14. Ernstson, H., et al. (2010) ‘Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: The case of Stockholm’, Ecology and Society , 15(4), art28. Folke, C., et al. (2002) ‘Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations’, Ambio , 31(5), pp. 437–440. Fredsøe, J. (1984) ‘Turbulent boundary layer in wave-current motion’, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering , 110(8), pp. 1103–1120. Fredsøe, J. and Deigaard, R. (1992) Mechanics of Coastal Sediment Transport . Singapore: World Scientific. Frihy, O.E., Dewidar, K.M., Nasr, S.M. and El Raey, M. (1998) ‘Change detection of the northeastern Nile Delta of Egypt: shoreline changes, Spit evolution, margin changes of Manzala lagoon and its islands’, International Journal of Remote Sensing , 19(10), pp. 1901–1912. Genz, A.S., et al. (2007) ‘The predictive accuracy of shoreline change rate methods and alongshore beach variation on Maui, Hawaii’, Journal of Coastal Research , 23(1), pp. 87–105. Gunderson, L.H. and Holling, C.S. (eds.) (2002) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems . Washington, D.C.: Island Press. Holling, C.S. (1973) ‘Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics , 4, pp. 1–23. ICZM Impacts Annex (2022) Annex II: Impacts . Deliverable for the project Development of Climate Resilient Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) Plan for the North Coast of Egypt . ICZM Numerical Model Report (2024) Deliverable 1.2.2: Numerical model for simulating sediment transport and coastal erosion/sedimentation . Deliverable for the project Development of Climate Resilient Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) Plan for the North Coast of Egypt . IPCC (2019) IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate . IPCC (2022) Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability . Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Kirshen, P., Ruth, M. and Anderson, W. (2008) ‘Interdependencies of urban climate change impacts and adaptation strategies: a case study of metropolitan Boston USA’, Climatic Change , 86(1-2), pp. 105–122. Leichenko, R. (2011) ‘Climate change and urban resilience’, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability , 3(3), pp. 164–168. Lima, C.H.R., et al. (2021) ‘Recent increase in oceanic cyclone heat potential in the North Atlantic and its impact on hurricane intensification rates’, Geophysical Research Letters , 48(12), e2021GL093798. Little, R.G. (2002) ‘Controlling cascading failure: Understanding the vulnerabilities of interconnected infrastructures’, Journal of Urban Technology , 9(1), pp. 109–123. Macklin, M.G., et al. (2013) ‘A new model of river-delta evolution: The Nile Delta and its wider biogeomorphic context’, Geology , 41(7), pp. 755–758. Nienhuis, J.H., et al. (2020) ‘Global-scale human impact on delta morphology has led to net land gain’, Nature , 577(7791), pp. 514–518. NIRAS (2022) Shoreline Evolution Analysis based on Satellite Images . Deliverable 1.2.2.2 for the project Development of Climate Resilient Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) Plan for the North Coast of Egypt . Nutalaya, P., et al. (1996) ‘Land subsidence in Bangkok, Thailand’, in Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Subsidence . Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 171–206. O'Rourke, T.D. (2007) ‘Critical infrastructure, interdependencies, and resilience’, The Bridge , 37(1), pp. 22–29. Sestini, G. (1992) ‘Implications of climatic changes for the Nile Delta’, in Jeftic, L., Milliman, J.D. and Sestini, G. (eds.) Climatic Change and the Mediterranean . London: Edward Arnold, pp. 535–601. Singh, O.P., et al. (2000) ‘Tropical cyclone frequency in the north Indian Ocean in relation to sea surface temperature and upper-ocean heat content’, Mausam , 51(3), pp. 217–228. Stanley, D.J. (1988) ‘Subsidence in the northeastern Nile Delta: Rapid rates, possible causes, and consequences’, Science , 240(4851), pp. 497–500. Stanley, D.J. and Warne, A.G. (1994) ‘Worldwide initiation of Holocene marine deltas by deceleration of sea-level rise’, Science , 265(5169), pp. 228–231. Sweet, W.V., et al. (2022) Global and Regional Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United States . Silver Spring, MD: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Thieler, E.R., et al. (2017) Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) version 4.0—An ArcGIS extension for calculating shoreline change (ver. 4.4, July 2017) . U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1278. Williams, A.T., Rangel-Buitrago, N., Pranzini, E. and Anfuso, G. (2018) ‘The management of coastal erosion’, Ocean & Coastal Management , 156, pp. 4–20. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8007558","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":577508233,"identity":"a688f79e-d958-4aec-b3e2-a8bd3900218f","order_by":0,"name":"Taher Osman","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Cairo University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Taher","middleName":"","lastName":"Osman","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-11-01 19:08:12","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8007558/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8007558/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":100795552,"identity":"d185df47-1fce-43d5-be82-1fc4ae12763a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:26:03","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":11115738,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ManuscriptAuthor.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/34ad478e9e1a3ec527079c3c.docx"},{"id":100797144,"identity":"677da3a4-4096-4132-ad3e-8de06f25936f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:47:25","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":3822,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"eef42cbd54f04f2ba63ce1c270dee094.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/9a7a9ecb9a0988f27fa2e849.json"},{"id":100797177,"identity":"963c9651-b309-4b06-83cc-e83256ec456a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:47:37","extension":"xml","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":110515,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"eef42cbd54f04f2ba63ce1c270dee0941enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/98d6e7b7871932c9da2f75a6.xml"},{"id":100798465,"identity":"9b3ebac8-409a-4d55-839c-74430a8fa6d9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:54:25","extension":"jpeg","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":724666,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/4de217dc6e0d96786fb86935.jpeg"},{"id":100795553,"identity":"dd07f91c-07ab-4b83-ac5e-470e8dd20e6c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:26:03","extension":"jpeg","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1910985,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/2f3ee3978c932818ecf11032.jpeg"},{"id":100795568,"identity":"8a41c029-6c3b-4d1f-a61a-b11537ee4e35","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:26:04","extension":"jpeg","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":2595149,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/f6eb05f4fb36207c8e44f072.jpeg"},{"id":100795565,"identity":"e1d0b9b1-e8b3-491f-bfbb-747b16e88a7a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:26:04","extension":"jpeg","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":2298405,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/06bc767e51123b667119142b.jpeg"},{"id":100795562,"identity":"391623fe-8627-47c3-92d8-7f5dce86d4e1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:26:03","extension":"jpeg","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":2192013,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage5.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/ba8bcfd2b93e40cad8300407.jpeg"},{"id":100795559,"identity":"10985490-7074-49c6-85a4-0671c39a0347","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:26:03","extension":"jpeg","order_by":8,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1862429,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage6.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/35b57cd6ab5ef46131c1927f.jpeg"},{"id":100795555,"identity":"603aed91-4a6a-4870-960c-607f55dffc86","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:26:03","extension":"png","order_by":9,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":183808,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/5b427a17a76c925856369b73.png"},{"id":100797143,"identity":"091d5a8c-e177-4791-a175-6135f13fa6f4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:47:25","extension":"png","order_by":10,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":545105,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/b778f27615d9c5fbc84ab0d2.png"},{"id":100795560,"identity":"bc149d86-a20c-4058-bac3-fad25e74bfa9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:26:03","extension":"png","order_by":11,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":905806,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/ad2d249b9610a4ef5228a71a.png"},{"id":100795566,"identity":"b80cd176-74ce-426b-b7ac-38afd03f6491","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:26:04","extension":"png","order_by":12,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":739637,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/a10ab2212130149f01d15b8b.png"},{"id":100795564,"identity":"0854b138-0377-4a5d-b973-dbfd43ae46a9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:26:04","extension":"png","order_by":13,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":666699,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/97fa8b39c7d5c60770801d2a.png"},{"id":100795563,"identity":"8f4a2b3a-375c-46e1-88be-f1620fed611e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:26:03","extension":"png","order_by":14,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":508065,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/3544c7f05d1cf770aba4ed7e.png"},{"id":100795561,"identity":"725a65b3-1e6b-4a2d-a37f-6f08651d9df9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:26:03","extension":"xml","order_by":15,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":108473,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"eef42cbd54f04f2ba63ce1c270dee0941structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/b9d40c3a302167e6d15526c3.xml"},{"id":100795557,"identity":"8199c17a-e205-4f61-a640-6a974d819beb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:26:03","extension":"html","order_by":16,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":119712,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/7158ba282757250e3005ce97.html"},{"id":100795551,"identity":"ba81932a-6434-412a-8399-c851f7c5320c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:26:03","extension":"jpeg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":724666,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eThe study area\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/c40fae4ccc6331e9e6ec6d02.jpeg"},{"id":100797124,"identity":"744736f3-9929-4a53-81ff-8f93326c0fb9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 13:47:14","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2601787,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eCoastal Dynamics for the Egyptian Mediterranean Region\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/eabdc193553bbccf3463414d.png"},{"id":106751395,"identity":"f9c11f0d-fd8a-4c96-b578-c8bb01c88979","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-13 06:58:39","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":4259269,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8007558/v1/c102a13a-c10b-430c-a41a-303c28971e18.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Assessing Nile Delta Coastal Region shoreline dynamics to inform urban resilience planning","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eRiver deltas represent some of the most productive and dynamic landscapes on Earth. As critical interfaces between terrestrial and marine systems, they host immense biodiversity, support fertile agricultural lands, and are hubs of global commerce and population (Bianchi and Allison, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Nienhuis et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Macklin et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). Nearly half a billion people reside in deltaic regions, which are characterized by their low-lying topography and rich natural resources (Nienhuis et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). However, these vital socio-ecological systems are facing a global predicament, increasingly recognized as a \"triple threat\" that jeopardizes their long-term viability. First, anthropogenic alterations to river basins, most notably the construction of upstream dams, have drastically reduced the fluvial sediment supply that is essential for maintaining deltaic landmass against natural subsidence (Bianchi and Allison, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Stanley and Warne, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1994\u003c/span\u003e; Williams et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). Second, this sediment starvation is compounded by accelerated relative sea-level rise (RSLR), a combination of eustatic sea-level rise driven by global warming and localized land subsidence from sediment compaction and groundwater extraction (IPCC, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Sweet et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; Allison et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Third, intensifying urbanization and agricultural development lead to \"coastal squeeze,\" where natural coastal habitats are trapped between rising seas and fixed inland infrastructure, eliminating their capacity to adapt naturally (Agrawala et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e; De Graaf-van Dinther, 2021). This convergence of pressures has pushed many of the world's major deltas, including the Mekong, Mississippi, and Indus, into a state of crisis, characterized by land loss, increased flood risk, and shoreline retreat (Bianchi and Allison, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Nienhuis et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; IPCC, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Nile Delta stands as a stark paradigm of this global challenge. It is one of the world's most anciently settled and intensely modified deltaic systems, and it is now considered among the most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and human intervention (Agrawala et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e; Sestini, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e; Stanley, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e; IPCC, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Historically, the annual flooding of the Nile River deposited vast quantities of nutrient-rich sediment, building and sustaining the delta for millennia (Nienhuis et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Macklin et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). This natural process was abruptly terminated following the completion of the Aswan High Dam in 1970. The dam, while providing critical benefits such as flood control and hydroelectric power, trapped over 90% of the Nile's sediment load in Lake Nasser, effectively starving the delta of its lifeblood (Ali and El-Magd, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Stanley, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e; Sestini, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e). This sudden shift from an accretional to an erosional regime initiated a phase of widespread coastal retreat and disequilibrium that continues to this day (Darwish et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe socio-economic stakes of this transformation are immense. The Nile Delta, comprising just 2.3% of Egypt's land area, is home to nearly half of its population and is the nation's agricultural heartland and industrial engine (Agrawala et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e; Abdrabo and Hassaan, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Sestini, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e). Major urban centers, including the metropolis of Alexandria and the port cities of Damietta and Port Said, are situated directly on this vulnerable coastline, concentrating critical infrastructure and economic assets in areas of high physical risk (Darwish et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). Projections of RSLR, combining global sea-level rise with local subsidence rates of up to 8 mm/year in some areas, suggest that a significant portion of the delta could be inundated by the end of the century, displacing millions of people and threatening trillions of dollars in economic value (Agrawala et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e; Becker and Sultan, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Sestini, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn response to these threats, coastal management in the Nile Delta has historically followed a \"coastal protection\" paradigm, characterized by the deployment of hard-engineering structures such as seawalls, revetments, groins, and breakwaters at specific erosion hotspots (Eldeberky, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Williams et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; El-Asmar and Taha, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). While these interventions can provide localized, short-term stability, they often fail to address the root cause of the problem\u0026mdash;the regional sediment deficit\u0026mdash;and can trigger unintended negative consequences, such as accelerated erosion in adjacent, downdrift areas (Ali and El-Magd, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). This fragmented approach highlights the limitations of a purely engineering-focused framework and underscores the need for a more holistic and integrated perspective.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis paper adopts an \"urban resilience\" framework to re-examine the challenge of coastal change in the Nile Delta. Urban resilience is defined not merely as the ability to resist shocks, but as the capacity of complex urban systems\u0026mdash;encompassing their social, economic, ecological, and physical components\u0026mdash;to absorb disturbances, reorganize while retaining essential functions, and adapt and transform in the face of chronic stresses and acute events (Holling, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1973\u003c/span\u003e; Folke et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e; Bruneau et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e; Adger et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e). Within this framework, shoreline dynamics are not viewed as an isolated physical problem but as a critical driver of urban vulnerability. Persistent erosion directly threatens urban resilience by undermining critical infrastructure (roads, ports, power plants), degrading economic livelihoods (agriculture, fisheries, tourism), and increasing the social vulnerability of coastal communities to flooding and storm surges (Ali and El-Magd, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Darwish et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Leichenko, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Kirshen, Ruth and Anderson, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e). The response to this erosion is itself a critical component of the system. A sequence of poorly planned, localized interventions can create a negative feedback loop, where solving one problem creates another, progressively undermining the resilience of the entire coastal system. This process is evident in the Nile Delta, where the initial shock of the Aswan Dam has been followed by decades of urban expansion into vulnerable areas and the implementation of fragmented coastal defenses that disrupt natural sediment pathways, ultimately amplifying risk across the region.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile the general vulnerability of the Nile Delta is well-established in the scientific literature, there remains a critical gap in high-resolution, spatiotemporally explicit analyses that quantitatively link shoreline dynamics to the efficacy of current management strategies and the broader goals of urban resilience. Many existing studies rely on decadal-scale analyses with limited spatial detail, which can obscure the highly localized and rapid nature of coastal change. This study aims to fill this gap by providing a robust, up-to-date quantitative assessment of erosion and accretion hotspots using a dense time-series of high-resolution satellite imagery. The novel contribution of this paper is threefold: first, it delivers a detailed, quantitative baseline of recent shoreline change rates (2017\u0026ndash;2022) across the entire delta at a 200 m spatial interval, identifying and quantifying the most extreme erosion and accretion hotspots. Second, it critically evaluates the spatial relationship between these hotspots, patterns of urban development, and the location of hard-engineering interventions, providing empirical evidence of maladaptive outcomes. Third, based on this evidence, it proposes a conceptual shift towards a resilience-based framework for coastal management in the Nile Delta, advocating for integrated sediment management and adaptive governance as pathways to a more sustainable urban future.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Methods and Data","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1 Study Area: The Urbanized Coast of the Nile Delta\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study area encompasses the entire Mediterranean coastline of the Nile Delta (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e), a classic arcuate delta extending approximately 270 km from Alexandria in the west to Port Said in the east. This coastal zone is characterized by a low-lying, gently sloping coastal plain, with large portions lying less than 2 m above mean sea level (Darwish et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Sestini, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e). Key morphological features include the two main active river promontories at Rosetta and Damietta, extensive coastal lagoons (Idku, Burullus, and Manzala) separated from the sea by narrow sand barriers, and a series of sandy beaches interspersed with rocky headlands, particularly in the western sector (Ali and El-Magd, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). The region is densely populated and heavily developed, hosting major urban centers such as Alexandria, Rosetta, Damietta, and Port Said, alongside intensive agricultural lands that rely on a complex network of irrigation canals and drains (Agrawala et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e; Williams et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). For analytical purposes, the coastline was segmented into distinct Coastal Units (CUs) and sub-cells based on established geomorphological and hydrodynamic characteristics, allowing for a structured assessment of regional variability in shoreline dynamics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2 Observational Analysis of Shoreline Change\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2.1 Data Acquisition and Pre-processing\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo capture recent shoreline dynamics with high spatiotemporal fidelity, this study utilized a comprehensive dataset derived from the European Space Agency's (ESA) Sentinel-2 mission. The dataset comprises Level-1C products from the twin Sentinel-2A and Sentinel-2B satellites, downloaded from the ESA SciHub portal. These satellites provide multispectral imagery with a high temporal resolution (a combined 5-day revisit period) and a spatial resolution of 10 m in the visible and near-infrared (NIR) bands, which is ideal for detailed shoreline mapping.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe temporal scope of the analysis spans a five-year period from January 4, 2017, to January 18, 2022 Due to the data availability in the study area. This period was selected to provide a contemporary baseline of coastal dynamics, reflecting the interplay of current environmental drivers and management interventions. The pre-processing workflow involved several key steps. First, all available images within the study period were screened, and only those with less than 20% cloud cover over the coastal zone were selected for further processing to ensure high data quality. These selected images then underwent atmospheric correction to convert top-of-atmosphere reflectance values to surface reflectance. The entire study area was covered by mosaicking four adjacent Sentinel-2 tiles (100\u0026times;100 km) for each acquisition date.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2.2 Automated Shoreline Extraction\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA robust and repeatable methodology was employed for the automated extraction of the land-water interface from the pre-processed satellite imagery. This approach is critical for efficiently handling the large volume of data in the time-series analysis. The core of the method is the calculation of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), a spectral index that maximizes the contrast between open water bodies and terrestrial features. The NDWI is calculated using the green and NIR bands as follows:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNDWI= (Green\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NIR)(Green\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;NIR)​\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe resulting grayscale NDWI images, where water features have high positive values, were then subjected to an automated thresholding procedure. The Otsu method, a well-established algorithm in image processing, was applied to each NDWI image. This method automatically determines an optimal threshold value to segment the image into two classes (land and water) by minimizing the intra-class variance. The resulting binary raster was then converted into a vector polyline, representing the extracted shoreline for that specific date. This automated workflow minimizes subjective operator bias and ensures consistency across the entire time series, although minor inaccuracies can arise from transient features like breaking waves or unmasked clouds. The reliance on a large number of extracted shorelines, however, helps to minimize the impact of such individual errors on the final trend analysis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2.3 Shoreline Change Analysis using DSAS\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuantitative analysis of shoreline change was conducted using the Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) version 5.0, a widely used software extension for Esri ArcGIS developed by the U.S. Geological Survey (Thieler et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; NIRAS, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). DSAS provides a standardized statistical framework for calculating rates of change from a time series of shoreline positions. The analytical process involved three main steps. First, a continuous baseline was digitized offshore, roughly parallel to the general trend of the shoreline series. Second, DSAS was used to automatically cast perpendicular transects from this baseline toward the shore at a regular interval of 200 m along the entire delta coastline. This high density of transects ensures a detailed spatial analysis of shoreline behavior. Third, the software calculated the intersection points of each transect with the multiple vector shorelines, generating a time series of shoreline positions for each of the thousands of transects.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom these intersection data, several statistical metrics were computed to quantify the rate and magnitude of shoreline change. The primary metric used in this study is the Linear Regression Rate (LRR). The LRR is determined by fitting a least-squares regression line to all available shoreline positions for a given transect over the study period. The slope of this line represents the average annual rate of change (in meters per year) and is considered a robust indicator of the long-term trend as it utilizes all available data points (Dolan, Fenster and Holme, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1991\u003c/span\u003e; Genz et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e; NIRAS, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). To assess the statistical robustness of the LRR, the Coefficient of Determination (\u003cem\u003eLR\u003c/em\u003e2) was also calculated for each transect. The \u003cem\u003eLR\u003c/em\u003e2 value, ranging from 0.0 to 1.0, indicates the proportion of variance in the shoreline positions that is explained by the linear regression model. A high \u003cem\u003eLR\u003c/em\u003e2 value suggests a strong, consistent linear trend, while a low value indicates that the linear trend is small relative to other sources of variability, such as seasonal fluctuations or measurement noise. Other metrics, including the End Point Rate (EPR), which calculates the rate based only on the oldest and newest shorelines, and the Shoreline Change Envelope (SCE), which measures the total distance between the most landward and seaward shorelines, were also calculated for comparative purposes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3 Methodological Uncertainty\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe accuracy of satellite-derived shoreline analysis is subject to several sources of uncertainty. These can be broadly categorized as positioning errors, which relate to physical phenomena, and measurement errors, which relate to data processing. Positioning errors include transient effects such as tidal variations and wave run-up, which can alter the water line at the time of image acquisition. Measurement errors include image resolution, orthorectification errors, and potential inaccuracies during the automated shoreline digitization process. While DSAS allows for the statistical quantification of some of these uncertainties, this study primarily uses the Coefficient of Determination (\u003cem\u003eLR\u003c/em\u003e2) as an indicator of the robustness of the calculated trend. A low \u003cem\u003eLR\u003c/em\u003e2 value signifies that the multi-year linear trend is small compared to other sources of variability, including seasonal cycles and the aforementioned uncertainties.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.4 Process-Based Morphodynamic Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.4.1 Coastal Classification and Characterization\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo provide a geomorphological and hydrodynamic context for the observed shoreline changes, a coastal classification system was employed. DHI's coastal classification system characterizes sandy coastlines based on two primary parameters: the angle of wave incidence relative to the shore-normal orientation and the level of wave exposure. The angle of incidence is categorized into five classes, from perpendicular (Type 1) to nearly coast-parallel (Type 5), while wave exposure is categorized as Protected (P), Moderately exposed (M), or Exposed (E) based on the significant wave height exceeded 12 hours per year. This classification is critical for understanding inherent coastal stability; for instance, coastlines with a very oblique wave approach (Type 4E) are prone to instabilities that manifest as large-scale sand spits, a feature observed along the eastern Nile Delta.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.4.2 Numerical Modeling of Littoral Transport\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo move beyond a descriptive analysis and explain the physical drivers of erosion and accretion, this study utilized DHI's LITPACK numerical modeling system. LITPACK is an integrated modeling suite that simulates non-cohesive sediment transport along quasi-uniform coastlines. The model resolves wave propagation and breaking in the surf zone, calculates wave-generated longshore currents, and quantifies the resulting littoral sediment transport. Model simulations were conducted along representative cross-shore profiles for each sub-cell, using nearshore wave conditions derived from a hindcast study as boundary conditions. Based on an analysis of available sediment data, which showed considerable scatter, a constant mean grain size (D50) of 0.3 mm was used along the entire coastline to ensure consistency in the regional model. The model outputs provide quantitative estimates of the annual net and gross littoral drift (in m\u0026sup3;/year), allowing for the establishment of a coastal sediment balance and the identification of transport gradients that drive erosion and accretion.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.5 Future Scenario Projections\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo provide a forward-looking assessment of coastal risk, this study incorporated projections of future shoreline retreat based on climate change scenarios. The analysis utilized two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs): RCP4.5, representing a moderate greenhouse gas emissions scenario, and RCP8.5, representing a high-emissions pathway. Shoreline retreat was calculated for a near-term (2030\u0026ndash;2040) and a long-term (2050\u0026ndash;2070) horizon, relative to a 1986\u0026ndash;2005 baseline. The shoreline retreat calculations are based on the Bruun rule concept, which relates shoreline retreat to sea-level rise, considering the active beach profile and closure depth, which is in turn influenced by projected changes in wave heights.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMethodological Framework Summary\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eParameter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSpecification\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eData Source\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eData Source\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eESA Sentinel-2A \u0026amp; 2B Multispectral Instrument (MSI)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(ICZM Numerical Model Report, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTemporal Coverage\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4 January 2017\u0026ndash;18 January 2022\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSpatial Resolution\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10 m (Bands 2, 3, 4, 8 used for NDWI)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eShoreline Extraction\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNormalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) with Otsu automated thresholding\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnalysis Software\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEsri ArcGIS with USGS Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) v5.0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Thieler et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; NIRAS, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTransect Spacing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e200 m\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrimary Change Metric\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLinear Regression Rate (LRR) (m/year)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Dolan, Fenster and Holme, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1991\u003c/span\u003e; NIRAS, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUncertainty Metric\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCoefficient of Determination (\u003cem\u003eLR\u003c/em\u003e2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNumerical Model\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDHI LITPACK\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\" morerows=\"2\" rowspan=\"3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(ICZM Numerical Model Report, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSediment Size (D50)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.3 mm (assumed constant)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFuture Scenarios\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRCP4.5 and RCP8.5 (2030\u0026ndash;2040 and 2050\u0026ndash;2070)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3. Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.1 Observational Analysis of Shoreline Change (2017\u0026ndash;2022)\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.1.1 Regional Overview of Shoreline Dynamics\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe analysis of shoreline change across the entire Nile Delta from 2017 to 2022 reveals a coastline in a state of significant flux, characterized by a dominant, yet highly variable, erosional trend (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). The overall median Linear Regression Rate (LRR) for the entire study area was calculated to be \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.8 m/year, indicating a net landward retreat of the shoreline. However, this regional median masks profound spatial heterogeneity. The mean LRR of +\u0026thinsp;0.6 m/year and a large standard deviation of 27.5 underscore the presence of extreme local variations, with areas of intense erosion being counterbalanced by zones of significant accretion. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e provides a spatial visualization of these dynamics, illustrating a mosaic of coastal change where stable or accreting segments are punctuated by severe erosion hotspots. A notable finding is that many transects exhibit low \u003cem\u003eLR\u003c/em\u003e2 values, suggesting that in many areas, the multi-year linear trend is smaller than the inherent seasonal or cyclical variability of the shoreline. Conversely, the highest rates of both erosion and accretion are often associated with areas of anthropogenic intervention, such as the construction of harbors and coastal protection structures, where changes are more pronounced and unidirectional.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.1.2 Heterogeneity across Coastal Units (CUs)\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eDisaggregating the results by the predefined Coastal Units (CUs) provides a clearer picture of the regional variability in shoreline behavior (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). The analysis demonstrates that the coastal dynamics are far from uniform, with distinct patterns emerging in different geomorphological settings. For instance, some sub-cells, such as CU2-SUB1 (Alexandria), show a near-stable or slightly accretional median LRR of +\u0026thinsp;0.09 m/year, likely influenced by extensive coastal engineering and urban development. In stark contrast, the coastal units encompassing the historic river promontories exhibit alarming rates of erosion. CU3-SUB2, which includes the Rosetta promontory, stands out as the most erosional sub-cell, with a median LRR of \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;3.63 m/year and a relatively high median \u003cem\u003eLR\u003c/em\u003e2 of 0.21, indicating a strong and consistent erosional trend. Similarly, sub-cells CU4-SUB2 and CU4-SUB3, located around the Damietta promontory, also show significant median erosion rates of \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2.66 m/year and \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2.85 m/year, respectively. This quantitative comparison confirms that the delta's promontories, once the primary zones of sediment deposition and land building, have now become the epicenters of coastal retreat.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegional Shoreline Change Rates (2017\u0026ndash;2022) for Nile Delta Coastal Units\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSubarea\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMedian LRR (m/year)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMedian\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLR\u003c/em\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNumber of Transects\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCU1-SUB-6\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.44\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.06\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e149\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCU2-SUB-1\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e+\u0026thinsp;0.09\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.03\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e496\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCU3-SUB-1\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e+\u0026thinsp;0.08\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.09\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e296\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCU3-SUB-2\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-3.63\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.21\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e348\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCU3-SUB-3\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-2.08\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e292\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCU4-SUB-1\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.40\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.22\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e97\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCU4-SUB-2\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-2.66\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.05\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e118\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCU4-SUB-3\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-2.85\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e237\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCU5-SUB-1\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.80\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.21\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e254\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCU6-SUB-1\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-1.50\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e306\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.2 Analysis of Extreme Erosion and Accretion Hotspots\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eZooming in on specific \"detailed areas\" within the highly dynamic CUs reveals catastrophic rates of change that are orders of magnitude greater than the regional average (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). These hotspots represent critical points of failure in the coastal system and are often directly linked to either the natural process of deltaic lobe erosion or the localized impacts of human structures.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Rosetta Promontory (CU3-SUB2) is the most severely eroding region. Within this sub-cell, Detailed Area 18 exhibits a staggering median LRR of \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;15.66 m/year. The exceptionally high median \u003cem\u003eLR\u003c/em\u003e2 of 0.72 confirms that this is not a transient fluctuation but a powerful, persistent erosional trend, representing the rapid dismantling of the historic delta lobe in the absence of sediment replenishment from the Nile.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe area around the Burullus Lagoon outlet (CU3-SUB3) is also highly dynamic, with pockets of extreme erosion. Detailed Area 40, for example, displays a median LRR of \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;21.72 m/year, one of the highest rates recorded in the entire delta. This intense erosion highlights the vulnerability of the narrow sand barriers that protect the vital lagoon ecosystems.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Damietta Promontory (CU4-SUB2 and CU4-SUB3) shows a complex pattern of erosion and accretion heavily influenced by engineering works. In CU4-SUB2, Detailed Area 54, located immediately downdrift (east) of a series of large T-shaped groins, is eroding at a median rate of \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;6.67 m/year. This provides clear quantitative evidence of downdrift erosion caused by coastal protection structures that interrupt the natural longshore sediment transport. Further east, the large sandspit at the mouth of the Damietta branch (CU4-SUB3) exhibits extreme volatility, with annual changes in area fluctuating between net erosion of over 300,000 \u003cem\u003em\u003c/em\u003e2 and net accretion of over 450,000 \u003cem\u003em\u003c/em\u003e2 in consecutive years, illustrating its highly unstable nature .\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConversely, areas of major anthropogenic intervention also create hotspots of accretion. Near the Suez Canal entrance (CU5-SUB1), recent changes to the harbor layout and the construction of new groins have induced rapid accretion in Detailed Area 67. This accretion, however, comes at a direct cost to the adjacent coastline. Just to the west, Detailed Area 60 is experiencing catastrophic erosion with a median LRR of \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;18.33 m/year and a near-perfect \u003cem\u003eLR\u003c/em\u003e2 of 0.86, demonstrating a direct and immediate link between the updrift accretion caused by the structures and severe downdrift sediment starvation. This pattern quantitatively confirms that many hard-engineering \"solutions\" do not solve erosion but merely redistribute it, often intensifying the problem in a new location.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnalysis of Extreme Erosion and Accretion Hotspots (2017\u0026ndash;2022)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSubarea\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMedian LRR (m/year)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMedian\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLR\u003c/em\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrimary Driver/Observation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCU3-SUB-2\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-15.66\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.72\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExtreme erosion of the Rosetta promontory\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCU3-SUB-3\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-12.21\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.51\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSignificant erosion west of Burullus outlet\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCU3-SUB-3\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-21.72\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.54\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCatastrophic erosion near Burullus outlet\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCU4-SUB-2\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-8.43\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.19\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh erosion west of Damietta promontory\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCU4-SUB-2\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-6.67\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.46\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDowndrift erosion caused by coastal groins\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCU5-SUB-1\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-18.33\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.86\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSevere downdrift erosion west of Port Said\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.3 Modeled Sediment Dynamics and Model Validation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe numerical modeling results provide a process-based explanation for the observed shoreline changes by quantifying the littoral drift and establishing a coastal sediment balance. The model shows a clear divergence of sediment transport around the Nile's promontories. West of the Rosetta mouth (in CU3-1), the potential net littoral transport is directed westward at a rate of approximately 180,000 m\u0026sup3;/year, while east of the mouth (in CU3-2), it is directed eastward at a rate of around 200,000 m\u0026sup3;/year. This divergence, in the absence of fluvial sediment supply, creates a significant sediment deficit and drives the chronic erosion observed in the satellite data. Similarly, east of the Damietta mouth (in CU4-3), the model calculates a net eastward transport of approximately 370,000 m\u0026sup3;/year, explaining the severe erosion at the base of the Damietta spit.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe model's outputs were validated against observed shoreline changes. For example, in the area west of Rosetta (CU3-1), the total volume of sand eroded between 2003 and 2023, as estimated from satellite imagery, corresponds to an average sediment loss of approximately 190,000 m\u0026sup3;/year. This figure shows strong agreement with the modeled potential transport rate of 180,000 m\u0026sup3;/year for the same area, lending high confidence to the model's ability to represent the dominant coastal processes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.4 Projected Future Shoreline Retreat\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eProjections of future shoreline retreat under different climate scenarios highlight the escalating risk to the delta's urbanized coast. The analysis indicates that shoreline retreat is expected to continue and likely accelerate, particularly under the high-emissions RCP8.5 scenario. For the long-term horizon (2050\u0026ndash;2070), projections show expected shoreline retreat of several tens of meters across many parts of the delta, with the most vulnerable sandy coastlines potentially retreating by over 100 meters. These projections underscore the long-term unsustainability of current coastal configurations and the increasing threat to coastal infrastructure, agriculture, and urban settlements.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4. Discussion","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1 The Legacy of Sediment Starvation and the Modern Drivers of Change\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe quantitative results presented in this study provide a high-resolution snapshot of a coastal system in profound disequilibrium. The foundational driver of this instability is the regional sediment deficit initiated by the construction of the Aswan High Dam in the mid-twentieth century (Stanley, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e; Ali and El-Magd, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Darwish et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). By trapping virtually all of the Nile's sediment load, the dam transformed the delta from a prograding, river-dominated system into a retreating, wave-dominated one (Agrawala et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e). The extreme erosion rates observed at the Rosetta and Damietta promontories (\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;15.66 m/year and \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;6.67 m/year in hotspots, respectively) are a direct manifestation of this legacy. These promontories, which were the primary depocenters for millennia, are now being actively eroded by marine forces. In the absence of new fluvial sediment, the coastal system is effectively cannibalizing its own landmass; wave energy erodes the most exposed and historically sediment-rich deltaic lobes to supply the longshore transport system.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis pre-existing vulnerability is now being amplified by the accelerating impacts of global climate change. Rising global sea levels, combined with significant local land subsidence due to sediment compaction and groundwater extraction, are causing an accelerated rate of relative sea-level rise (RSLR) across the delta (Agrawala et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e; Becker and Sultan, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Darwish et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; IPCC, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). This RSLR increases water depths in the nearshore zone, allowing more powerful waves to reach the coast, and permanently inundates the lowest-lying areas, exacerbating the erosional pressure on the shoreline. The littoral drift, driven by the prevailing northwesterly wave climate, acts as the relentless conveyor belt in this system, transporting the limited available sediment eastward and ensuring that eroded material is permanently lost from the hotspots.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec22\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.2 Coastal Squeeze and the Maladaptation of Urban Development\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe physical processes of erosion and sediment transport are unfolding in a landscape of intense and expanding urbanization, creating a classic \"coastal squeeze\" scenario (Agrawala et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e). As the natural shoreline retreats landward, it encounters an increasingly rigid line of human development, including cities, agricultural lands, and critical infrastructure like the international coastal highway (Darwish et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Sestini, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e; Williams et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). This dynamic places immense pressure on urban systems and has prompted a widespread response based on a paradigm of \"holding the line\" through the construction of hard-engineering defenses (Eldeberky, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Williams et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; El-Asmar and Taha, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHowever, the results of this study strongly suggest that this approach often constitutes a form of maladaptation\u0026mdash;an action taken to reduce vulnerability that inadvertently increases it in the long term or shifts it to other locations. The stark contrast between accretion updrift of structures and catastrophic erosion downdrift, as quantified in areas like CU4-SUB2 and CU5-SUB1, provides compelling evidence for this phenomenon. The construction of a groin or breakwater to protect a specific resort or section of a city creates a sediment trap, interrupting the natural longshore transport system (Ali and El-Magd, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). While this may stabilize the shoreline locally, it starves the downdrift coast of its sediment supply, triggering or accelerating erosion there. This leads to a domino effect, where the community newly affected by erosion is then compelled to build its own protective structures, propagating the problem further along the coast. This cycle reflects a profound \"scale mismatch\" in governance: the problem of sediment deficit is regional, spanning the entire delta, yet the responses are hyper-local, uncoordinated, and competitive. This mismatch ensures the long-term failure of current strategies, perpetuating a cycle of environmental degradation and systematically redistributing risk rather than reducing it.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec23\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.3 Conceptualizing Resilience: From Hard Defenses to Socio-Ecological Integration\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAchieving long-term urban resilience in the Nile Delta requires a fundamental shift away from the failing paradigm of localized, hard protection toward a holistic, socio-ecological systems approach (Gunderson and Holling, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e; Adger et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e). True resilience cannot be built by erecting ever-higher concrete walls against natural processes; it must be cultivated by working \u003cem\u003ewith\u003c/em\u003e these processes to restore a more balanced and sustainable coastal system (Leichenko, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Kirshen, Ruth and Anderson, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e). This requires a multi-pronged strategy that addresses the root causes of vulnerability and embraces a broader portfolio of adaptation options.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFirst, an Integrated Sediment Management strategy is paramount. This involves treating sediment not as a nuisance to be dredged and disposed of, but as a vital natural resource for coastal defense. This could involve feasibility studies for engineering solutions to bypass a fraction of the sediment trapped behind the Aswan High Dam or, more pragmatically, the sustainable mining of offshore sand deposits\u0026mdash;remnants of the ancient Nile fan\u0026mdash;for large-scale, strategic beach nourishment programs (Eldeberky, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSecond, there is a need to prioritize Nature-Based Solutions (NbS). The restoration and protection of natural coastal features like sand dunes and wetlands can provide effective and adaptive buffers against storm surge and erosion, while also delivering co-benefits such as habitat preservation and carbon sequestration (Leichenko, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Williams et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; De Graaf-van Dinther, 2021). Projects like the construction of sand dikes stabilized with native vegetation represent a step in this direction, offering a lower-cost, more environmentally integrated alternative to hard structures (Williams et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinally, these physical interventions must be embedded within a framework of Adaptive Governance and Planning. This requires the development and stringent enforcement of a national Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) plan for the entire North Coast (Abdrabo and Hassaan, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). Such a plan should be informed by scientific evidence, like that presented in this study, to establish legally binding setback zones that restrict new development in high-erosion areas. It must also strengthen inter-agency coordination among the ministries responsible for water resources, environment, and urban planning to overcome the fragmented, project-by-project decision-making that currently prevails (Agrawala et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e). By managing the coast as a single, interconnected system, such a governance framework can begin to break the cycle of maladaptation and steer the Nile Delta toward a more resilient and sustainable future.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"5. Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study has provided a high-resolution, quantitative assessment of contemporary shoreline dynamics across the urbanized Nile Delta, revealing a system under severe stress. The primary findings are threefold. First, the delta is experiencing a net erosional trend, with a regional median shoreline retreat of \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.8 m/year between 2017 and 2022. Second, this regional average conceals a pattern of extreme spatial heterogeneity, with catastrophic erosion hotspots\u0026mdash;particularly at the Rosetta and Damietta promontories\u0026mdash;experiencing retreat rates exceeding \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;20 m/year. Third, these hotspots of extreme change are strongly correlated with anthropogenic factors: the foundational driver is the basin-scale sediment deficit caused by the Aswan High Dam, while the most intense local gradients of erosion and accretion are directly linked to the proliferation of hard-engineering coastal structures. These findings collectively demonstrate that the current coastal management paradigm, which relies on fragmented, localized protection, is often maladaptive, redistributing risk and exacerbating erosion in adjacent areas rather than building systemic resilience.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe evidence presented in this paper points toward the urgent need for a strategic reorientation of coastal management in Egypt. To move from a cycle of reactive crisis management to a proactive strategy of building long-term urban resilience, the following policy and planning actions are recommended:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdopt an Integrated Sediment Management Strategy: The Government of Egypt should elevate sediment management to a national strategic priority. This requires treating sediment as a finite and valuable resource for coastal defense. A national-level task force should be commissioned to conduct feasibility studies on innovative solutions to address the sediment deficit, including the potential for sediment bypassing around upstream dams and the sustainable exploitation of offshore sand deposits for large-scale, strategically planned beach nourishment projects (Eldeberky, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImplement and Enforce a Climate-Resilient Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) Plan: The development of a national ICZM plan is a critical step that must be followed by robust implementation and enforcement (Abdrabo and Hassaan, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). This plan must be legally empowered to establish and enforce science-based coastal setback lines to guide future urban development away from high-risk zones. It should also mandate a shift in preference from hard structures to nature-based solutions where ecologically and economically viable, and require comprehensive environmental impact assessments for any new coastal project that considers its effect on the entire coastal sediment cell, not just the immediate vicinity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStrengthen Governance and Institutional Capacity: Effective coastal management requires overcoming institutional fragmentation. This involves strengthening coordination mechanisms between key government bodies, such as the Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation, the Ministry of Environment, and the General Organization for Physical Planning (Agrawala et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e). Empowering a single lead agency with the authority and resources to oversee the implementation of the ICZM plan and manage the coastline as an integrated system is essential to break the current cycle of uncoordinated, and often counterproductive, local interventions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile this study provides a crucial baseline, charting a resilient future for the Nile Delta requires ongoing research to address remaining knowledge gaps. Future research should prioritize three key areas:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eCoupled Socio-Ecological Modeling\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere is a need for integrated assessment models that couple coastal morphodynamic projections with socio-economic vulnerability data. Such models would allow for a more nuanced understanding of the cascading impacts of shoreline change on urban infrastructure, agricultural productivity, livelihoods, and population displacement, enabling more targeted and equitable adaptation planning.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eComparative Analysis of Adaptation Pathways\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eRigorous, long-term cost-benefit analyses are needed to compare the full life-cycle costs (economic, social, and environmental) of different adaptation pathways. These studies should compare traditional hard protection against nature-based solutions, nourishment strategies, and options for managed retreat or relocation in the most vulnerable areas to inform evidence-based investment decisions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eGovernance and Social Science Research\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eTechnical solutions alone are insufficient. Future research must investigate the social and political barriers to implementing integrated and adaptive management. This includes studying community perceptions of risk, understanding the political economy of coastal development decisions, and identifying governance models that can foster collaboration, ensure equity, and facilitate the societal transformations necessary for long-term resilience in the face of profound environmental change (Sestini, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e; Leichenko, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch4\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics Statement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting Interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe author declares no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor Contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eT.O. is the sole author of this work and was responsible for the conception, design, analysis, interpretation, and writing of the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData Availability\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the author on reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent to Participate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for Publication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAbdrabo, M.A. and Hassaan, M.A. (2015) \u0026lsquo;An integrated framework for urban resilience to climate change - Case study: Sea level rise impacts on the Nile Delta coastal urban areas\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eUrban Climate\u003c/em\u003e, 14, pp. 554\u0026ndash;565.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAdger, W.N., Hughes, T.P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S.R. and Rockstr\u0026ouml;m, J. (2005) \u0026lsquo;Social-Ecological Resilience to Coastal Disasters\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eScience\u003c/em\u003e, 309(5737), pp. 1036\u0026ndash;1039.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAgrawala, S., et al. (2004) \u003cem\u003eDevelopment and Climate Change in Egypt: Focus on Coastal Resources and the Nile\u003c/em\u003e. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAlberti, M., et al. (2003) \u0026lsquo;The Impact of Urban Patterns on Ecosystem Function\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eUrban Ecosystems\u003c/em\u003e, 7(3), pp. 241\u0026ndash;265.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAli, E.M. and El-Magd, I.A. (2016) \u0026lsquo;Impact of human interventions and coastal processes along the Nile Delta coast, Egypt during the past twenty-five years\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEgyptian Journal of Aquatic Research\u003c/em\u003e, 42(1), pp. 1\u0026ndash;10.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAllison, I., et al. (2021) \u003cem\u003eThe Cryosphere in a Changing Climate\u003c/em\u003e. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAndersson, E. (2006) \u0026lsquo;Urban landscapes and sustainable cities\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEcology and Society\u003c/em\u003e, 11(1), art29.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAntrobus, G.G. (2007) \u0026lsquo;Resilience and vulnerability in a small, coastal, rural community\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Rural and Community Development\u003c/em\u003e, 2(2), pp. 1-20.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBattjes, J.A. and Janssen, J.P.F.M. (1978) \u0026lsquo;Energy Loss and Set-Up due to Breaking of Random Waves\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Coastal Engineering\u003c/em\u003e. Hamburg, Germany: ASCE, pp. 569\u0026ndash;587.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBecker, R.H. and Sultan, M. (2009) \u0026lsquo;Land subsidence in the Nile Delta: Inferences from radar interferometry\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eThe Holocene\u003c/em\u003e, 19(6), pp. 949\u0026ndash;954.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBianchi, T.S. and Allison, M.A. (2009) \u0026lsquo;Large-river delta-front estuaries as natural \u0026ldquo;recorders\u0026rdquo; of global environmental change\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences\u003c/em\u003e, 106(20), pp. 8085\u0026ndash;8092.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBruneau, M., et al. (2003) \u0026lsquo;A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEarthquake Spectra\u003c/em\u003e, 19(4), pp. 733\u0026ndash;752.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eChachavalpongpun, P. (2011) \u0026lsquo;Thailand\u0026rsquo;s 2011 Floods: A Turning Point for the Country?\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSoutheast Asian Affairs\u003c/em\u003e, 2012, pp. 325\u0026ndash;343.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDarwish, M., et al. (2017) \u0026lsquo;Assessment of shoreline changes along the Nile Delta coast, Egypt\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Coastal Conservation\u003c/em\u003e, 21(4), pp. 547\u0026ndash;560.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDe Graaf-van Dinther, R. (2021) \u003cem\u003eClimate Resilient Urban Areas: Governance, Design and Development in Coastal Delta Cities\u003c/em\u003e. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDolan, R., Fenster, M.S. and Holme, S.J. (1991) \u0026lsquo;Temporal analysis of shoreline recession and accretion\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Coastal Research\u003c/em\u003e, 7(3), pp. 723\u0026ndash;744.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eEl-Asmar, H.M. and Taha, M.M.N. (2022) \u0026lsquo;Monitoring Coastal Changes and Assessing Protection Structures at the Damietta Promontory, Nile Delta, Egypt, to Secure Sustainability in the Context of Climate Changes\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainability\u003c/em\u003e, 14(22), p. 15415.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eEldeberky, Y. (2011) \u0026lsquo;Coastal adaptation to sea level rise along the Nile delta, Egypt\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eCoastal Processes II\u003c/em\u003e. WIT Press, pp. 41\u0026ndash;52.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eElfrink, B., et al. (2003) \u0026lsquo;Stability of a straight sandy coast with a dominant oblique wave climate\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eCoastal Sediments \u0026apos;03\u003c/em\u003e. Clearwater Beach, Florida: World Scientific, pp. 1\u0026ndash;14.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eErnstson, H., et al. (2010) \u0026lsquo;Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: The case of Stockholm\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEcology and Society\u003c/em\u003e, 15(4), art28.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFolke, C., et al. (2002) \u0026lsquo;Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eAmbio\u003c/em\u003e, 31(5), pp. 437\u0026ndash;440.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFreds\u0026oslash;e, J. (1984) \u0026lsquo;Turbulent boundary layer in wave-current motion\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Hydraulic Engineering\u003c/em\u003e, 110(8), pp. 1103\u0026ndash;1120.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFreds\u0026oslash;e, J. and Deigaard, R. (1992) \u003cem\u003eMechanics of Coastal Sediment Transport\u003c/em\u003e. Singapore: World Scientific.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFrihy, O.E., Dewidar, K.M., Nasr, S.M. and El Raey, M. (1998) \u0026lsquo;Change detection of the northeastern Nile Delta of Egypt: shoreline changes, Spit evolution, margin changes of Manzala lagoon and its islands\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Remote Sensing\u003c/em\u003e, 19(10), pp. 1901\u0026ndash;1912.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGenz, A.S., et al. (2007) \u0026lsquo;The predictive accuracy of shoreline change rate methods and alongshore beach variation on Maui, Hawaii\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Coastal Research\u003c/em\u003e, 23(1), pp. 87\u0026ndash;105.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGunderson, L.H. and Holling, C.S. (eds.) (2002) \u003cem\u003ePanarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems\u003c/em\u003e. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHolling, C.S. (1973) \u0026lsquo;Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics\u003c/em\u003e, 4, pp. 1\u0026ndash;23.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eICZM Impacts Annex (2022) \u003cem\u003eAnnex II: Impacts\u003c/em\u003e. Deliverable for the project \u003cem\u003eDevelopment of Climate Resilient Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) Plan for the North Coast of Egypt\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eICZM Numerical Model Report (2024) \u003cem\u003eDeliverable 1.2.2: Numerical model for simulating sediment transport and coastal erosion/sedimentation\u003c/em\u003e. Deliverable for the project \u003cem\u003eDevelopment of Climate Resilient Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) Plan for the North Coast of Egypt\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eIPCC (2019) \u003cem\u003eIPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eIPCC (2022) \u003cem\u003eClimate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability\u003c/em\u003e. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKirshen, P., Ruth, M. and Anderson, W. (2008) \u0026lsquo;Interdependencies of urban climate change impacts and adaptation strategies: a case study of metropolitan Boston USA\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eClimatic Change\u003c/em\u003e, 86(1-2), pp. 105\u0026ndash;122.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLeichenko, R. (2011) \u0026lsquo;Climate change and urban resilience\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\u003c/em\u003e, 3(3), pp. 164\u0026ndash;168.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLima, C.H.R., et al. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Recent increase in oceanic cyclone heat potential in the North Atlantic and its impact on hurricane intensification rates\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eGeophysical Research Letters\u003c/em\u003e, 48(12), e2021GL093798.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLittle, R.G. (2002) \u0026lsquo;Controlling cascading failure: Understanding the vulnerabilities of interconnected infrastructures\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Urban Technology\u003c/em\u003e, 9(1), pp. 109\u0026ndash;123.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMacklin, M.G., et al. (2013) \u0026lsquo;A new model of river-delta evolution: The Nile Delta and its wider biogeomorphic context\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eGeology\u003c/em\u003e, 41(7), pp. 755\u0026ndash;758.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eNienhuis, J.H., et al. (2020) \u0026lsquo;Global-scale human impact on delta morphology has led to net land gain\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eNature\u003c/em\u003e, 577(7791), pp. 514\u0026ndash;518.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eNIRAS (2022) \u003cem\u003eShoreline Evolution Analysis based on Satellite Images\u003c/em\u003e. Deliverable 1.2.2.2 for the project \u003cem\u003eDevelopment of Climate Resilient Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) Plan for the North Coast of Egypt\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eNutalaya, P., et al. (1996) \u0026lsquo;Land subsidence in Bangkok, Thailand\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eSea-Level Rise and Coastal Subsidence\u003c/em\u003e. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 171\u0026ndash;206.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eO\u0026apos;Rourke, T.D. (2007) \u0026lsquo;Critical infrastructure, interdependencies, and resilience\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eThe Bridge\u003c/em\u003e, 37(1), pp. 22\u0026ndash;29.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSestini, G. (1992) \u0026lsquo;Implications of climatic changes for the Nile Delta\u0026rsquo;, in Jeftic, L., Milliman, J.D. and Sestini, G. (eds.) \u003cem\u003eClimatic Change and the Mediterranean\u003c/em\u003e. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 535\u0026ndash;601.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSingh, O.P., et al. (2000) \u0026lsquo;Tropical cyclone frequency in the north Indian Ocean in relation to sea surface temperature and upper-ocean heat content\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eMausam\u003c/em\u003e, 51(3), pp. 217\u0026ndash;228.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eStanley, D.J. (1988) \u0026lsquo;Subsidence in the northeastern Nile Delta: Rapid rates, possible causes, and consequences\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eScience\u003c/em\u003e, 240(4851), pp. 497\u0026ndash;500.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eStanley, D.J. and Warne, A.G. (1994) \u0026lsquo;Worldwide initiation of Holocene marine deltas by deceleration of sea-level rise\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eScience\u003c/em\u003e, 265(5169), pp. 228\u0026ndash;231.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSweet, W.V., et al. (2022) \u003cem\u003eGlobal and Regional Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United States\u003c/em\u003e. Silver Spring, MD: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eThieler, E.R., et al. (2017) \u003cem\u003eDigital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) version 4.0\u0026mdash;An ArcGIS extension for calculating shoreline change (ver. 4.4, July 2017)\u003c/em\u003e. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1278.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWilliams, A.T., Rangel-Buitrago, N., Pranzini, E. and Anfuso, G. (2018) \u0026lsquo;The management of coastal erosion\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eOcean \u0026amp; Coastal Management\u003c/em\u003e, 156, pp. 4\u0026ndash;20.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Urban Resilience, Coastal Erosion, Nile Delta, Sediment Management, Remote Sensing, Numerical Modeling, Climate Adaptation","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8007558/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8007558/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThe urbanized coast of the Nile Delta, a region of immense socio-economic importance, faces escalating threats from coastal erosion and accretion, driven by a confluence of anthropogenic pressures and climate change. This study presents an integrated, multi-method assessment of shoreline dynamics to analyze their implications for urban resilience. The research combines a high-resolution observational analysis of shoreline change using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery (2017\u0026ndash;2022) with a process-based numerical model (LITPACK) to quantify the underlying drivers of littoral sediment transport and establish a regional sediment balance. Furthermore, future shoreline retreat is projected under IPCC RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios for near-term (2030\u0026ndash;2040) and long-term (2050\u0026ndash;2070) horizons. The findings reveal a complex pattern of coastal change, with a regional median erosion rate of \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.8 m/year masking localized hotspots where erosion exceeds \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;20 m/year. The numerical model quantifies the severe sediment deficit and transport gradients responsible for this erosion, particularly around the Rosetta and Damietta promontories, and validates these findings against observed shoreline changes. Projections indicate continued and potentially accelerated shoreline retreat, directly threatening critical urban infrastructure. The results demonstrate a critical disconnect between localized, hard-engineering adaptation strategies and the regional scale of the sediment deficit, which often exacerbates vulnerability in downdrift locations. This paper argues for a paradigm shift in coastal management, moving from a reactive, site-specific protection approach towards a proactive, integrated framework that prioritizes regional sediment management and nature-based solutions to build long-term socio-ecological resilience for the delta's urban centers.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Assessing Nile Delta Coastal Region shoreline dynamics to inform urban resilience planning","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-01-21 13:25:58","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8007558/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"d93f97ca-ce4c-40f5-a26c-814074ff70a2","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 21st, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":61441902,"name":"Earth and environmental sciences/Climate sciences"},{"id":61441903,"name":"Scientific community and society/Developing world"},{"id":61441904,"name":"Earth and environmental sciences/Environmental sciences"},{"id":61441905,"name":"Social science/Environmental studies"},{"id":61441906,"name":"Scientific community and society/Geography"},{"id":61441907,"name":"Social science/Geography"},{"id":61441908,"name":"Earth and environmental sciences/Natural hazards"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-13T06:57:53+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-01-21 13:25:58","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8007558","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8007558","identity":"rs-8007558","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}