Modelling multicellular coordination by bridging cell-cell communication and intracellular regulation through multilayer networks

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

In multicellular organisms, cells with various roles and locations coordinate to provide systemic and cohesive response to perturbations. These complex behaviors emerge from a complex interplay between intracellular regulation and intercellular signals that mediate cell-cell communication. While single-cell technologies opened the possibility of studying both, most methods focus solely on one of these aspects. Thus, they are only able to partially recover in vivo and multicellular behaviors. We here introduce ReCoN (REconstruction of multicellular COordination Networks from single-cell data), a framework combining intracellular gene regulation and cell-cell communication to provide insights into multicellular coordination from single-cell data. First, ReCoN infers from single-cell data a heterogeneous multilayer network containing both cell-type-specific intracellular subnetworks and ligand-receptor interactions. Through random walk with restart explorations, ReCoN then infers the response of each cell type to both intra- and extracellular perturbations, such as a gene knock-out or a cytokine, respectively. ReCoN was evaluated on predicting the in vivo response of immune cell-types to different cytokines and on recovering cardiac cell-type response in heart failure. It highlighted the role of indirect effects, where cells emit secondary messengers in response to the initial perturbation to coordinate multicellular transcriptomic responses. Additionally, ReCoN predicted distinct fibroblast states emerging in different microenvironments reconstructed from spatial data. ReCoN provides an interpretable modeling framework for multicellular systems that allows for the simulation of perturbations, including the assessment of the cellular selectivity of these treatments in vivo . Ultimately, it can help design patient-specific molecular therapies. Graphical abstract
Full text 2,161 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract In multicellular organisms, cells with various roles and locations coordinate to provide systemic and cohesive response to perturbations. These complex behaviors emerge from a complex interplay between intracellular regulation and intercellular signals that mediate cell-cell communication. While single-cell technologies opened the possibility of studying both, most methods focus solely on one of these aspects. Thus, they are only able to partially recover in vivo and multicellular behaviors. We here introduce ReCoN (REconstruction of multicellular COordination Networks from single-cell data), a framework combining intracellular gene regulation and cell-cell communication to provide insights into multicellular coordination from single-cell data. First, ReCoN infers from single-cell data a heterogeneous multilayer network containing both cell-type-specific intracellular subnetworks and ligand-receptor interactions. Through random walk with restart explorations, ReCoN then infers the response of each cell type to both intra- and extracellular perturbations, such as a gene knock-out or a cytokine, respectively. ReCoN was evaluated on predicting the in vivo response of immune cell-types to different cytokines and on recovering cardiac cell-type response in heart failure. It highlighted the role of indirect effects, where cells emit secondary messengers in response to the initial perturbation to coordinate multicellular transcriptomic responses. Additionally, ReCoN predicted distinct fibroblast states emerging in different microenvironments reconstructed from spatial data. ReCoN provides an interpretable modeling framework for multicellular systems that allows for the simulation of perturbations, including the assessment of the cellular selectivity of these treatments in vivo. Ultimately, it can help design patient-specific molecular therapies. Competing Interest Statement JSR reports in the last 3 years funding from GSK and Pfizer & fees/honoraria from Travere Therapeutics, Stadapharm, Astex Therapeutics, Owkin, Pfizer, Grunenthal, Tempus, Vera Therapeutics, and Moderna. RT, LC, and RORF declare no conflict of interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00