The Best Timing of IVF-ET after Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation for Patients with Hydrosalpinx

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) at different time intervals after laparoscopic tubal ligation on pregnancy outcomes. Methods The main outcome measures included: ovarian response index, laboratory index and clinical pregnancy outcome. The indicators were analyzed by univariate and multivariate-Logistic regression. Our study was a retrospective cohort study and 976 patients were included (Group 1: 0–3 months after ligation, N = 186, Group 2: 3–6 months after ligation, N = 438, Group 3: 6–12 months after ligation, N = 352). Results The clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live birth rate (LBR) and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in group 1 were higher than those in group 2 and group 3 (61.36% vs. 52.89% vs. 56.61% for CPR, 53.79% vs. 43.93% vs. 47.93% for LBR, 76.34% vs. 69.41% vs. 65.91% for CLBR, P  < 0.05). In addition, the biochemical pregnancy abortion rate in group 1 was significantly lower (1.52% vs. 5.20% vs. 6.20%, P  < 0.05). In linear regression analysis, with the delay of IVF-ET treatment after ligation, the number of available D3 embryos, the rates of available blastocyst and high-quality blastocyst tended to decrease ( P  < 0.05). In logistic regression analysis, the CPR and LBR in group 1 were significantly higher than those in group 3 (OR: 578, 95%CI: 0.384, 0.870 for CPR, OR: 643, 95%CI: 0.436, 0.950 for LBR, P  < 0.05). For elderly patients, the different time intervals did not affect pregnancy outcomes. For patients with DOR, the LBR in group 1 was higher than that in group 2 and group 3 (69.23% vs. 32.43% vs. 60.0%, P   0.05). Conclusions For patients with hydrosalpinx, IVF-ET treatment within 3 months after laparoscopic tubal ligation would result in more potential embryos and better pregnancy outcomes.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00