Telegram @manmax90 buy cocaine in London By optimizing the computed tomography (CT) examination process and vial-sharing strategy, cost-effective solutions have been provided for both patients and hospitals

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background: This study optimized the computed tomography (CT) examination process through multi-departmental collaboration and changed the billing method for contrast agents from single vial billing to vial-sharing billing. And the objective of this study was to compare and analyse the differences in drug costs and drug wastes of the two mode, as well as to analyze and summarize the benefits and deficiencies to hospitals and patients. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Tongji Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei province, China. Data were extracted from the Hospital Information System (HIS) for preparations from July 2023 to June 2024. Data on prescription drugs wasted were collected from the Hospital Information System (HIS). We collected information on 9 types of drugs, including their names, unit prices per vial, drug specifications, actual dosages, etc. Microsoft Office Excel 2016 was used to compile and analyze the data in this study. The amount of saved, drug waste costs, and cost saved of drugs are collated and summed. Results: Optimizing the CT examination process through multi-departmental collaboration was completed. A total of 2906398.8 mL of contrast agent saved, with the cost of 9,181,958.83 CNY in a year by vial-sharing, and each prescription saved 66.93 CNY for patients on average. Conclusion: Vial-sharing strategy have reduced a significant amount of drug waste, reduced the economic burden on patients, improved drug utilization efficiency, and saved medical resources.
Full text 2,754 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background:This study optimized the computed tomography (CT) examination process through multi-departmental collaboration and changed the billing method for contrast agents from single vial billing to vial-sharing billing. And the objective of this study was to compare and analyse the differences in drug costs and drug wastes of the two mode, as well as to analyze and summarize the benefits and deficiencies to hospitals and patients. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Tongji Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei province, China. Data were extracted from the Hospital Information System (HIS) for preparations from July 2023 to June 2024. Data on prescription drugs wasted were collected from the Hospital Information System (HIS). We collected information on 9 types of drugs, including their names, unit prices per vial, drug specifications, actual dosages, etc. Microsoft Office Excel 2016 was used to compile and analyze the data in this study. The amount of saved, drug waste costs, and cost saved of drugs are collated and summed. Results: Optimizing the CT examination process through multi-departmental collaboration was completed. A total of 2906398.8 mL of contrast agent saved, with the cost of 9,181,958.83 CNY in a year by vial-sharing, and each prescription saved 66.93 CNY for patients on average. Conclusion: Vial-sharing strategy have reduced a significant amount of drug waste, reduced the economic burden on patients, improved drug utilization efficiency, and saved medical resources. Information & Authors Information Version history Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License.

Keywords

Authors Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 2687views 136downloads Citations Download citation YANCHAO YIN, Wei Fu, Lin Qiu, et al. Telegram @manmax90 buy cocaine in London By optimizing the computed tomography (CT) examination process and vial-sharing strategy, cost-effective solutions have been provided for both patients and hospitals. Authorea. 24 January 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.173771135.55855960/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.173771135.55855960/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00