Substantial genomic and methylation variability between MCF-7 sublines

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Cancer cell lines have long been used as in vitro models for molecular assays in diagnostic and therapeutic development due to their accessibility as a well-controlled system. MCF-7 cell lines are the most widely studied cell lines in human breast cancer research, and its sublines have been reported to exhibit clonal, cytogenetic, and transcriptomic variability. However, allele-specific methylation alterations in cancer genomes remain inadequately explored, largely due to limitations in sequencing methods. Here, we applied nanopore sequencing technology to characterise the genomic and epigenomic landscapes of two MCF-7 sublines. We identified global and local DNA methylation differences as well as structural variants (SVs), and single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) between and within the sublines. Our analysis revealed substantial divergence in methylation patterns between the sublines, with ∼3% of the differentially methylated regions (DMRs) overlapping with known cancer driver genes. These DMRs overlap breast cancer-associated genes, including ERBB2, CDH1, SALL4, GATA2, GATA3, HMGA2, and FBLN2. We find that the majority of differentially methylated sites are explained by differential allelic methylation, and that allele-specific DMRs often overlap points where antisense non-coding RNAs overlap protein-coding genes. Transposable elements in both sublines also showed distinct methylation profiles, with one subline having hypomethylated L1 elements compared to the other, which correlated with the amount of apparent insertional mutagenesis attributable to L1 between the sublines. Our study demonstrates the utility of nanopore sequencing in providing novel insights into genomic and methylomic differences within cell lines, in addition to insight into the nature of differential allelic methylation.
Full text 3,475 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Cancer cell lines have long been used as in vitro models for molecular assays in diagnostic and therapeutic development due to their accessibility as a well-controlled system. MCF-7 cell lines are the most widely studied cell lines in human breast cancer research, and its sublines have been reported to exhibit clonal, cytogenetic, and transcriptomic variability. However, allele-specific methylation alterations in cancer genomes remain inadequately explored, largely due to limitations in sequencing methods. Here, we applied nanopore sequencing technology to characterise the genomic and epigenomic landscapes of two MCF-7 sublines. We identified global and local DNA methylation differences as well as structural variants (SVs), and single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) between and within the sublines. Our analysis revealed substantial divergence in methylation patterns between the sublines, with ∼3% of the differentially methylated regions (DMRs) overlapping with known cancer driver genes. These DMRs overlap breast cancer-associated genes, including ERBB2, CDH1, SALL4, GATA2, GATA3, HMGA2, and FBLN2. We find that the majority of differentially methylated sites are explained by differential allelic methylation, and that allele-specific DMRs often overlap points where antisense non-coding RNAs overlap protein-coding genes. Transposable elements in both sublines also showed distinct methylation profiles, with one subline having hypomethylated L1 elements compared to the other, which correlated with the amount of apparent insertional mutagenesis attributable to L1 between the sublines. Our study demonstrates the utility of nanopore sequencing in providing novel insights into genomic and methylomic differences within cell lines, in addition to insight into the nature of differential allelic methylation. Competing Interest Statement A.E. has received reimbursement for travel, accommodation, and conference fees to speak at events organised by Oxford Nanopore Technologies. The remaining authors declare no competing interests. List of Abbreviations - 5mC/5mCpG/5mCG - 5-methyl cytosine, 5-methyl cytosine-guanine - AS - Antisense - ASE - Antisense expression - ATCC - American Type Culture Collection - CDH1 - Cadherin-1 / Epithelial Cadherin - CDK6 - Cyclin-dependent kinase 6 - COL2A1 - Collagen type II alpha 1 chain - CpG - Cytosine followed by Guanine in a DNA context - CRE - cis-regulatory element - DMR - Differentially Methylated Region - EBF1 - Early B-cell factor 1 - ECACC - European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures - ERBB2 - Erb-B2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 2, aka HER2 - FBLN2 - Fibulin-2 - FGFR2 - Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 - GATA2 - GATA-binding protein 2 - GATA3 - GATA-binding protein 3 - HC - High-confidence - HMGA2 - High mobility group AT-hook 2 - HOTAIR - HOX Antisense Intergenic RNA - HOXC11 - Homeobox C11 - L1 / LINE-1 - Long INterspersed Element-1 - LEF1 - Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 - mRNA - messenger RNA - MYCN - N-myc / basic helix-loop-helix protein 37 - ncRNA - non-coding RNA - NKX2-1 - NK2 homeobox 1 - PTEN - Phosphatase and tensin homolog - SALL4 - Spalt-like transcription factor 4 - SNV - Single-nucleotide variant - SV - Structural variant - TE - Transposable element - TF - Transcription factor - TFBS - Transcription factor binding site - VCF - Variant call format - VNTR - Variable number of tandem repeats - WT1 - Wilms’ tumour-1 - ZEB1 - Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00