A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Chronic Stress on the Prefrontal Transcriptome in Animal Models and Convergence with Existing Human Data

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background Chronic stress is a major risk factor for psychiatric disorders, including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Chronic stress can cause structural alterations like grey matter atrophy in key emotion-related areas such as the prefrontal cortex (PFC). To identify biological pathways affected by chronic stress in the PFC, researchers have performed transcriptional profiling (RNA-sequencing, microarray) to measure gene expression in rodent models. However, transcriptional signatures in the PFC that are shared across different chronic stress paradigms and laboratories remain relatively unexplored. Methods We performed a meta-analysis of publicly available transcriptional profiling datasets within the Gemma database. We identified six datasets that characterized the effects of either chronic social defeat stress (CSDS) or chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) on gene expression in the PFC in mice ( n =117). We fit a random effects meta-analysis model to the chronic stress effect sizes (log(2) fold changes) for each transcript ( n =21,379) measured in most datasets. We then compared our results with two other published chronic stress meta-analyses, as well as transcriptional signatures associated with psychiatric disorders. Results We identified 133 genes that were consistently differentially expressed across chronic stress studies and paradigms (false discovery rate (FDR)<0.05). Fast Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (fGSEA) revealed 53 gene sets enriched with differential expression (FDR<0.05), dominated by glial and neurovascular markers ( e.g., oligodendrocyte, astrocyte, endothelial/vascular) and stress-related signatures ( e.g., major depressive disorder, hormonal responses). Immediate-early gene markers of neuronal activity ( Fos, Junb, Arc, Dusp1 ) were consistently suppressed. Many of the identified effects resembled those seen in previous meta-analyses characterizing stress effects (CSDS, early life stress), despite minimal overlap in included samples. Moreover, some effects resembled previous observations from psychiatric disorders, including alcohol abuse disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that chronic stress induces a robust, cross-paradigm PFC signature characterized by down-regulation of glia/myelin and vascular pathways and suppression of immediate-early gene activity, highlighting cellular processes linking chronic stress exposure, PFC dysfunction, and psychiatric disorders. Graphical Abstract Key Points Chronic stress is linked to many human psychiatric disorders involving the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Meta-analysis showed that stressed mice had less gene expression for glia and neural activity in the PFC. PFC gene expression in chronically stressed mice mirrors patterns seen in psychiatric patients. Plain Language Summary Chronic stress has been shown to have lasting effects on the brain, contributing to cognitive impairments and the risk of psychiatric disorders such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The prefrontal cortex, a brain region that is important for behavioral and attentional control, is sensitive to chronic stress. We combined information from six public mouse datasets to identify consistent effects of chronic stress on gene expression (mRNA) in the prefrontal cortex. In these studies, mice that had experienced chronic stress showed a decreased amount of mRNA related to a variety of non-neuronal support cells (glia) and blood vessels, and general neural activity. The mouse chronic stress signature overlapped with gene-activity patterns reported in human psychiatric conditions, suggesting a biological bridge between chronic stress and the onset of psychopathology.
Full text 90,666 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Chronic Stress on the Prefrontal Transcriptome in Animal Models and Convergence with Existing Human Data | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Chronic Stress on the Prefrontal Transcriptome in Animal Models and Convergence with Existing Human Data View ORCID Profile Jinglin Xiong , View ORCID Profile Megan H. Hagenauer , View ORCID Profile Cosette A. Rhoads , View ORCID Profile Elizabeth Flandreau , Nancy Rempel-Clower , View ORCID Profile Erin Hernandez , View ORCID Profile Duy Manh Nguyen , View ORCID Profile Annaka Saffron , View ORCID Profile Toni Duan , View ORCID Profile Stanley Watson Jr. , View ORCID Profile Huda Akil doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.23.683091 Jinglin Xiong 1 Grinnell College , Grinnell, IA USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Jinglin Xiong Megan H. Hagenauer 2 Michigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI USA Ph.D. Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Megan H. Hagenauer For correspondence: hagenaue{at}umich.edu Cosette A. Rhoads 1 Grinnell College , Grinnell, IA USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Cosette A. Rhoads Elizabeth Flandreau 4 Grand Valley State University , Allendale, MI USA Ph.D. Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Elizabeth Flandreau Nancy Rempel-Clower 1 Grinnell College , Grinnell, IA USA Ph.D. Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Erin Hernandez 1 Grinnell College , Grinnell, IA USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Erin Hernandez Duy Manh Nguyen 1 Grinnell College , Grinnell, IA USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Duy Manh Nguyen Annaka Saffron 3 Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, MD USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Annaka Saffron Toni Duan 1 Grinnell College , Grinnell, IA USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Toni Duan Stanley Watson Jr. 2 Michigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI USA M.D., PhD. Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Stanley Watson Jr. Huda Akil 2 Michigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI USA Ph.D. Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Huda Akil Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Background Chronic stress is a major risk factor for psychiatric disorders, including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Chronic stress can cause structural alterations like grey matter atrophy in key emotion-related areas such as the prefrontal cortex (PFC). To identify biological pathways affected by chronic stress in the PFC, researchers have performed transcriptional profiling (RNA-sequencing, microarray) to measure gene expression in rodent models. However, transcriptional signatures in the PFC that are shared across different chronic stress paradigms and laboratories remain relatively unexplored. Methods We performed a meta-analysis of publicly available transcriptional profiling datasets within the Gemma database. We identified six datasets that characterized the effects of either chronic social defeat stress (CSDS) or chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) on gene expression in the PFC in mice ( n =117). We fit a random effects meta-analysis model to the chronic stress effect sizes (log(2) fold changes) for each transcript ( n =21,379) measured in most datasets. We then compared our results with two other published chronic stress meta-analyses, as well as transcriptional signatures associated with psychiatric disorders. Results We identified 133 genes that were consistently differentially expressed across chronic stress studies and paradigms (false discovery rate (FDR)<0.05). Fast Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (fGSEA) revealed 53 gene sets enriched with differential expression (FDR<0.05), dominated by glial and neurovascular markers ( e.g., oligodendrocyte, astrocyte, endothelial/vascular) and stress-related signatures ( e.g., major depressive disorder, hormonal responses). Immediate-early gene markers of neuronal activity ( Fos, Junb, Arc, Dusp1 ) were consistently suppressed. Many of the identified effects resembled those seen in previous meta-analyses characterizing stress effects (CSDS, early life stress), despite minimal overlap in included samples. Moreover, some effects resembled previous observations from psychiatric disorders, including alcohol abuse disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that chronic stress induces a robust, cross-paradigm PFC signature characterized by down-regulation of glia/myelin and vascular pathways and suppression of immediate-early gene activity, highlighting cellular processes linking chronic stress exposure, PFC dysfunction, and psychiatric disorders. Download figure Open in new tab Key Points Chronic stress is linked to many human psychiatric disorders involving the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Meta-analysis showed that stressed mice had less gene expression for glia and neural activity in the PFC. PFC gene expression in chronically stressed mice mirrors patterns seen in psychiatric patients. Plain Language Summary Chronic stress has been shown to have lasting effects on the brain, contributing to cognitive impairments and the risk of psychiatric disorders such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The prefrontal cortex, a brain region that is important for behavioral and attentional control, is sensitive to chronic stress. We combined information from six public mouse datasets to identify consistent effects of chronic stress on gene expression (mRNA) in the prefrontal cortex. In these studies, mice that had experienced chronic stress showed a decreased amount of mRNA related to a variety of non-neuronal support cells (glia) and blood vessels, and general neural activity. The mouse chronic stress signature overlapped with gene-activity patterns reported in human psychiatric conditions, suggesting a biological bridge between chronic stress and the onset of psychopathology. Introduction Stress is defined as the psychophysiological response triggered by an actual or perceived threat ( Schneiderman et al., 2005 ). Acute stress usually does not pose a significant health risk - indeed, some activation of the stress system is essential at the neurobiological and functional level ( McEwen & Akil, 2020 ). Chronic stress, however, can exceed the system’s capacity to return to homeostasis, resulting in high allostatic load coupled with structural alterations in key brain regions ( Schneiderman et al., 2005 ; McEwen et al., 2016), cognitive impairment ( Lupien et al., 2009 ), and the development of psychiatric disorders, including major depressive disorder (MDD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) ( Musazzi et al., 2023 ; Westfall et al., 2021 ). To study chronic stress, researchers use diverse paradigms in laboratory rodent models including, but not limited to, social isolation, chronic mild stress, repeated restraint stress, chronic social defeat stress (CSDS), social instability stress, and chronic unpredictable/variable stress (CUMS)( Becker et al., 2021 ; Touchant & Labonté, 2022 ). Animals subjected to these different stress paradigms can manifest different responses but also show common behavioral phenotypes. For example, CSDS, social isolation, early life stress, and CUMS have all been shown to induce anxiety-like and depression-like behaviors ( Nestler & Hyman, 2010 ; Touchant & Labonté, 2022 ), and both the CSDS and CUMS paradigms are widely used models for MDD (Gururajan et al., 2019; Nestler & Hyman, 2010 ). These models have revealed that susceptibility and resilience to stress-related emotional disorders are likely affected by an interaction of genetic inborn differences, epigenetic programs, and environmental factors ( Clinton et al., 2022 ). A key brain region in stress regulation is the prefrontal cortex (PFC). PFC is involved in emotional processing and cognition ( Gray et al., 2002 ). Chronic stress causes structural and functional changes in the PFC, including retraction in the dendrites of pyramidal cells ( Arnsten, 2009 ). Therefore, analyzing stress-induced changes in gene expression within the PFC may improve our understanding of the etiology of stress-sensitive disorders. Transcriptional profiling, such as RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) and microarray, can yield a large volume of information about the functional effects of stress-related interventions, yet also present many challenges, including large-scale technical noise ( Hicks et al., 2018 ). These studies are often conducted with small sample sizes, which increases the likelihood of false negative and false positive results due to low statistical power ( Button et al., 2013 ). To draw a more conclusive picture of stress-induced gene expression changes in the PFC, we conducted a meta-analysis of transcriptional profiling data from publicly available datasets investigating the effect of chronic stress in laboratory rodents. To minimize bias, we used standardized and systematic methods to identify, extract, and exclude datasets and run the meta-analysis. These methods enabled us to identify PFC transcriptional signatures related to chronic stress that are consistent across experiments and chronic stress paradigms. To strengthen the validity of our findings, we compared our results with recent related meta-analyses and systematic reviews that employed different methodological approaches ( Duan et al., 2025 ; Gururajan, 2022 ; Reshetnikov et al., 2022 ; Stankiewicz et al., 2022a ). Additionally, we explored the relationship between chronic stress-induced transcriptional changes and those observed in psychiatric disorders by comparing our findings with large-scale meta-analyses of data from human cortical tissue ( Gandal et al., 2018 ; Piras et al., 2022 ). These comparisons allowed us to examine the translational relevance of our findings and identify convergent stress-related molecular signatures. Methods Meta-Analysis Methods General Overview This meta-analysis was conducted as part of the Brain Data Alchemy Project, a collective effort to improve the reliability and generalizability of transcriptional profiling findings using meta-analyses of public datasets. This guided effort uses a standardized pipeline for dataset identification, inclusion/exclusion, and meta-analysis (protocol for 2022: (M. Hagenauer et al., 2024 ), example validation: ( Rhoads et al., 2025 ), not pre-registered ). It capitalizes on the data curation, preprocessing, and analysis efforts of the Gemma database ( Lim et al., 2021 ; Zoubarev et al., 2012 ). Gemma currently houses >19,000 re-analyzed transcriptional profiling datasets, with preprocessing that includes up-to-date microarray probe alignment and RNA-Seq read mapping, sample and gene-level quality control, and identification of potential batch confounds. Within Gemma, differential expression analyses are performed using the limma (microarray) or limma-voom (RNA-Seq) pipeline, providing users with outputs from omnibus (full dataset) tests and individual contrasts. Our analysis code (R v.4.2.0, R studio v.2022.02.4) is released at: https://github.com/Jinglin0320/Metaanalysis_GemmaOutput_CSDS_PFC_Jinglin . Dataset Identification and Selection Potential datasets were identified in the Gemma database ( https://gemma.msl.ubc.ca/home.html ) using pre-specified search terms related to chronic stress paradigms ( n =174 datasets), and narrowed using standardized inclusion/exclusion criteria ( Figure 1 ). To keep the project manageable, we narrowed the datasets further to CSDS and CUMS paradigms because they are well-established and widely used to model MDD (Gururajan et al., 2019; Nestler & Hyman, 2010 ). Both paradigms have particularly strong construct validity for the chronic uncontrollable, unpredictable stress that increases risk for depression in humans, consistently resulting in depression-like symptoms that can be reversed by chronic administration of SSRIs ( Deslauriers et al., 2018 ; Gyles et al., 2024 ). These two models have also been shown to exhibit overlapping effects on the transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome in other brain areas ( Gui et al., 2021 ; Gyles et al., 2024 ). We excluded one study that used a novel CSDS paradigm tailored to females ( Deonaraine et al., 2020 ), and one study that used a non-standard CSDS protocol with males, exposing a single intruder to three resident mice for 2 h/day for 6 days ( Wang et al., 2019 ). Preprocessed gene expression data was confirmed to fall into a range typical for log(2) expression (RNA-seq: -5 to 12, microarray: 4 to 15). One dataset (GSE114224, ( Chae et al., 2021 )) was excluded because it had a highly restricted range (2.5-4), suggesting that the log-transformation was performed incorrectly when the dataset was imported into the Gemma database. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. PRISMA diagram illustrating the dataset search terms and selection criteria used for the meta-analysis. Abbreviations: ROI=Region of Interest, Log2FC=Log(2)Fold Change, n= number of datasets. Characteristics of the Selected Datasets Six studies survived our criteria ( n =8 stress vs. control contrasts, Table 1 ). Three studies utilized the CUMS paradigm, with animals exposed to alternating stressors for either three weeks ( Ma et al., 2016 ; Labonté et al., 2017 ) or four weeks ( Yu et al., 2021 ), one of which used behavioral testing to screen for stress susceptible animals ( Ma et al., 2016 ). The other three studies employed the CSDS paradigm followed by a social interaction test to classify the mice into either a stress susceptible or stress resilient group. One of these studies administered CSDS for 14 days ( Lehmann et al., 2017 ) and the other two studies applied CSDS for 10 days ( Bagot et al., 2017 ; Laine et al., 2018 ). One study used 10-minutes of daily contact with the aggressor ( Laine et al., 2018 ) and the other two used 5-minutes ( Bagot et al., 2017 ; Lehmann et al., 2017 ). As our goal was to characterize generalized chronic stress responses, we included the effects of stress derived from both stress susceptible and stress resilient animals in our meta-analysis. However, due to common interest in the topic and potential clinical relevance ( Nestler & Russo, 2024 ), we maintained separate effect size estimates for the susceptible and resilient groups, allowing readers to view any related heterogeneity in forest plots and clustering analyses. In general subjects were overwhelmingly male, with the one study that included both sexes ( Labonté et al., 2017 ) coded with the reference level for sex set as male in the differential expression model in Gemma . Altogether, there was a final sample size of n =117 subjects, which should be sufficiently powered (80% power at alpha=0.05) to detect medium effect sizes. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1. Overview of the datasets included in the meta-analysis. The table lists the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) ID for the dataset, sample size (n) for the PFC experiment, authors and year of publication ( Bagot et al., 2016 ; Labonté et al., 2017 ; Laine et al., 2018 ; Lehmann et al., 2017 ; Ma et al., 2016 ; Yu et al., 2021 ), and transcriptional profiling platform. Study details include the species, strain, age, and sex of the subjects, brain region examined, the type of chronic stress, the duration of stress, specific experimental groups included in the statistical comparisons (contrasts) extracted for inclusion in the meta-analysis, delay between stress and tissue collection, and housing condition during the stress or control intervention. Abbreviations: PFC (prefrontal cortex, not otherwise defined), mPFC (medial PFC), vmPFC (ventromedial PFC), CSDS (chronic social defeat stress), CUMS (chronic unpredictable mild stress or chronic variable stress), Min: minute, P: postnatal age. Result Extraction The differential expression results for each of the relevant eight stress-related statistical contrasts (stress vs. control) were imported into R. Rows with probes or transcript sequences that mapped to multiple gene annotations (official gene symbol) were excluded, and gene-level average effect sizes (log(2) fold change or Log2FC), standard errors (SE), and sampling variances (SV) were calculated and aligned across datasets by gene symbol. Meta-Analysis To perform the meta-analysis, we used the metafor package (v.3.4.0, (Viechtbauer, 2010)) to fit a random effects model to the effect sizes of chronic stress (Log2FC values) and accompanying SV for each gene represented in at least five stress vs. control statistical contrasts ( n =21,379 genes). A minimum of five stress vs. control contrasts was chosen to ensure that a minimum of at least three studies were represented in the meta-analysis, to increase the power and generalizability of the results. Random effects modelling was chosen to account for the heterogeneous methods and sample characteristics across the included studies that might introduce variability amongst their true effects. To fit the random effects model, we used the function rma() from the metafor package, which treats this heterogeneity as purely random (normally distributed), estimated using restricted maximum-likelihood estimation (REML). The function uses the inverse-variance method, which treats the precision of each study’s estimated effect as inversely related to the study’s SV. Due to limited dataset availability, we used a simple, intercept-only model as our main outcome. The resulting p-values were corrected for false discovery rate (FDR) using the Benjamini-Hochberg method ( multtest package: v.2.8.0, ( Pollard et al., 2005 )). Functional Ontology To identify functional patterns, fast Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ( fGSEA: ( Sergushichev, 2016 )) was performed on the meta-analysis results, ranked by estimated Log2FC, using Brain.GMT (M. H. Hagenauer et al., 2024 ). Brain.GMT is a curated database of gene sets related to nervous system function, tissue, and cell types, packaged with traditional gene ontology gene sets (MSigDB “C5”: 14,996 gene sets). Comparison of Meta-Analysis Results to Related Studies Other Meta-Analyses Examining Chronic Stress Effects on the Rodent PFC While conducting our study, several meta-analyses were published addressing the effects of chronic stress on the PFC. These included a meta-analysis of the effects of either 10 days or 30 days of CSDS ( Reshetnikov et al., 2022 ), a small meta-analysis of stress-susceptibility vs. stress resilience ( Reshetnikov et al., 2022 ), and a meta-analysis of the effects of chronic stress, more broadly defined (CSDS, CUMS, or chronic restraint) ( Gururajan, 2022 ). Although these meta-analyses used public data, due to focusing exclusively on RNA-Seq datasets and differing inclusion/exclusion criteria they showed either only small partial overlap with our own sample ( 10 days CSDS : n=56, overlap 15%: n=18 of our 117; stress susceptibility vs. resilience: overlap 15%: n=18 of our 117; Chronic Stress: n=101, overlap 32%: 37 of our 117) or no overlap ( 30 days CSDS: n=20), and therefore could provide some independent insight into our findings. Results from the CSDS meta-analyses were extracted from Table STS3A ( 10 Days CSDS ), Table STS3C (stress susceptibility vs. resilience), and Table STS3B ( 30 Days CSDS ) ( Reshetnikov et al., 2022 ), which only contained results for genes surviving a nominal p <0.05 threshold. Results from the chronic stress meta-analysis were extracted from Suppl Table 1G ( “Combined Analysis” ) ( Gururajan, 2022 ), which only contained results for genes surviving an FDR<0.05 threshold. Other Large Studies Characterizing Stress Effects on the Rodent Brain We also compared our results to other studies examining stress effects on the brain using large sample sizes. These included a meta-analysis of the effects of early life stress on the PFC transcriptome (( Duan et al., 2025 ): n =89, full results for all genes extracted from Table S1 ) and a large study examining the effects of chronic daily corticosterone on the hippocampal transcriptome (( Juszczak et al., 2025 ): n =48, full results for all genes extracted from Suppl Data 2 (“All”)). The supplement for ( Juszczak et al., 2025 ) also provided a comprehensive database including results from large “vote-counting”- style literature reviews characterizing the direction of effect (up, down, mixed effects) for genes showing reported effects of acute and chronic stress in brain transcriptomic studies (Stankiewicz et al., 2022): 79 studies reviewed). We also ran several exploratory analyses that are more tangential and relegated to the supplement: We ran comparisons with the effects of acute stress and corticosterone treatment ( Jaszczyk et al., 2023 ; Juszczak et al., 2025 ; Stankiewicz et al., 2022a ) and acute sleep deprivation ( Diessler et al., 2018 ; Rhoads et al., 2025 ). We also conducted a small follow-up analysis to explore whether our meta-analysis findings might be male-specific using comparisons to published differential expression results broken down by sex ( Deonaraine et al., 2020 ; Labonté et al., 2017 ; Shao et al., 2025 ). Large Studies Characterizing the Effects of Psychiatric Disorders on the Cortex We compared our results to the effects of multiple psychiatric disorders on the cortical transcriptome. These included several large meta-analyses examining the effects of suicide in different regions of the PFC ( orbitofrontal PFC, dorsolateral PFC, PFC region unspecified , ( Piras et al., 2022 ): n =380). Results were extracted from Table S1 , which contained results for genes surviving an FDR<0.05 threshold in any of the four meta-analyses. We also referenced large microarray meta-analyses characterizing the effects of multiple psychiatric disorders on the cortex (MDD (BA9, BA25, BA46: n =176), Bipolar Disorder (BA46, parietal: n= 197), and Schizophrenia (BA46, BA10, parietal: n =314)), and a re-analysis of the effects of Alcohol Abuse Disorder on the superior frontal cortex (n=32) ( Table S1 in ( Gandal et al., 2018 ): results for all genes), as well as two large validation meta-analyses of RNA-Seq data characterizing the effects of Bipolar Disorder ( n =171) and Schizophrenia ( n =384) in the frontal cortex ( Table S2 in ( Gandal et al., 2018 ): results for all genes). It is important to note that the results of these psychiatric meta-analyses can only be considered partially independent: the Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia microarray meta-analyses share an overlapping set of control subjects, which also partially overlap the MDD microarray meta-analysis. Likewise, the Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia RNA-Seq meta-analyses share an overlapping set of control subjects. In contrast, there was no overlap between the samples included in the large meta-analyses of ( Gandal et al., 2018 ) and ( Piras et al., 2022 ). We also compared our meta-analysis results to a review of reported PTSD effects on the PFC transcriptome ((Stankiewicz et al., 2022): n =121), summarized in terms of categorical direction of effect ( Suppl Data 2 of ( Juszczak et al., 2025 )). To compare our results with human findings, we extracted information about human and mouse gene orthology from “HCOP: Orthology Predictions Search” ( https://www.genenames.org/tools/hcop/ , bulk download: 8-21-2025). This information was filtered down to 1) one-to-one mouse-to-human mapped orthologs, 2) orthologs with matching gene symbols, and 3) orthologs with multiple-to-one mouse-to-human mappings that had the most databases supporting the orthology ( column: “support” , ties broken by row index). Statistical Methods for Result Comparisons To conduct these comparisons, we extracted all available results for our 133 differentially expressed genes (“DEGs” FDR<0.05). If there were Log2FC values available, we examined the correlation with the Log2FC estimated from our chronic stress meta-analysis using both parametric (regression, Pearson’s correlation) and non-parametric (Spearman’s correlation) methods (functions: summary.lm, cor.test ). Results Meta-Analysis Overview Of the 21,379 genes included in the meta-analysis, 21,296 produced stable meta-analysis estimates ( full results: Table S1 ). Our meta-analysis revealed 133 DEGs (FDR<0.05), 97 of which were downregulated and 36 upregulated. A hierarchically-clustered heatmap of the top DEGs did not reveal a clear pattern related to stress paradigm or stress susceptibility, but potentially some clustering by platform ( Figure 2 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Heatmap of the top 50 differentially expressed genes across all 8 chronic stress vs. control comparisons. Rows correspond to the 50 genes with the smallest FDR, columns indicate the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) dataset ID (GSE#…) and specific chronic stress vs. control comparison. Columns are ordered by unsupervised hierarchical clustering of log2 fold-change (Log2FC) values so that chronic stress vs. control comparisons (contrasts) with similar results appear adjacent. The dendrogram at the top of the figure represents that similarity: the most similar items are joined at lower levels (“branches”), and less similar groups are joined higher up on the tree. Within the heatmap, pink indicates upregulation (positive Log2FC), and blue indicates down-regulation (negative Log2FC). Grey indicates that the gene lacks representation in the study. Example DEGs are illustrated with forest plots, showing the consistency of differential expression across studies and paradigms ( Figures 3 & 4 ). Chronic stress broadly downregulated gene expression important for glial development and function in the PFC ( Figure 3 ), including Aquaporin 4 ( Aqp4 ), S100 calcium-binding protein B ( S100b ), Fatty Acid 2-Hydroxylase ( Fa2h ), P2X purinoceptor 7 ( P2rx7 ), ELOVL fatty acid elongase 5 ( Elovl5 ), and Hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule ( Hepacam ). Chronic stress also suppressed immediate early gene (IEG) responses linked to neuronal activity and plasticity in the PFC ( Figure 4 ), including Fos proto-oncogene, AP-1 transcription factor subunit ( Fos ), JunB proto-oncogene, AP-1 transcription factor subunit ( Junb ), Activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein ( Arc ), and Dual specificity phosphatase 1 ( Dusp1 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Genes related to glial development and function are down-regulated in the PFC in chronic stress models. Forest plots illustrate the consistency of the down-regulation across datasets and conditions. Rows illustrate Log2FC (squares) with 95% confidence intervals (whiskers) for each of the datasets and the meta-analysis random effects model (RE Model). (A) Forest plot for Aquaporin 4 (Aqp4). (B) Forest plot for S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100b). (C) Forest plot for Fatty acid 2-hydroxylase (Fa2h). (D) Forest plot for P2X purinoceptor 7 (P2rx7). (E) Forest plot for ELOVL fatty acid elongase 5 (Elovl5). (F) Forest plot for hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule (Hepacam). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. Immediate early genes (IEGs) are down-regulated in the PFC in chronic stress models. Forest plots illustrate the consistency of the down-regulation across datasets and conditions. Formatting follows the conventions of Figure 3 . (A) Forest plot for Fos proto-oncogene, AP-1 transcription factor subunit (Fos). (B) Forest plot for JunB proto-oncogene, AP-1 transcription factor subunit (Junb). (C) Forest plot for Activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc). (D) Forest plot for Dual specificity phosphatase 1 (Dusp1). Functional Patterns We performed a fast gene set enrichment analysis ( fGSEA ) using a database containing both brain-related ( Brain.GMT ) and traditional gene ontology gene sets. Of the 10,847 gene sets included in the results, 49 were enriched with down-regulation following chronic stress and 4 enriched with upregulation (FDR<0.05, Table S2 ). Chronic stress altered gene sets that are associated with several brain cell types ( Table 2 ), with glial cells appearing to be central responders. The most prominent changes involved oligodendrocytes (8 out of 53) and developing oligodendrocytes (4 out of 53), which were uniformly downregulated. Gene sets related to astrocytes and astrocytic functions (4 out of 53), radial-glia-like signatures (3 out of 53), and vasculature (4 out of 53) were also downregulated after chronic stress. Only one neuronal-related gene set was affected, and one gene set broadly related to cell differentiation was downregulated. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 2. Functional gene sets that are enriched with the effects of chronic stress are related to various cell types. Size: Size of gene set. Leading genes: A list of the leading genes in the gene set that were significantly differentially expressed following chronic stress (FDR < 0.05) in the meta-analysis. Abbreviations: ES, enrichment score; FDR, false discovery rate; NES, normalized enrichment score. Gene set names have been reformatted for clarity. Our meta-analysis results showed an enrichment of differential expression in gene sets representing a variety of stress paradigms ( Table 3 ), providing some cross-validation. Notably, we observed enrichment in gene sets derived from CSDS experiments that were not included in our meta-analysis ( GSE72343, PFC-specific results unavailable within the Gemma database ( Bagot et al., 2016 ); GSE149195: PFC not profiled ( DiSabato et al., 2021 )). This convergence suggests that the molecular program we identified captures core elements of the brain’s chronic stress response that can be generalized to other brain regions. There was also enrichment in gene sets from other stress paradigms, including contextual fear conditioning, trace fear conditioning, forced swim stress, restraint stress, and novel stress. Some gene sets showed an enrichment of differential expression in our meta-analysis that showed the same direction of effect as the original experiment, whereas other stress gene sets were enriched but shifted in the opposite direction. These oppositely shifting gene sets were largely driven by classic IEGs including Fos , Arc , Dusp1 , Egr1. We also observed an enrichment in gene sets related to hormonal response and MDD, highlighting the relevance of our findings to stress-related psychopathology. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 3. Functional gene sets that are enriched with the effects of chronic stress are related to various types of stress, hormonal response, and MDD. Size: Size of gene set. Leading genes: A list of the leading genes in the gene set that were significantly differentially expressed following chronic stress (FDR<0.05) in the meta-analysis. Abbreviations: ES, enrichment score; FDR, false discovery rate; NES, normalized enrichment score. Gene set names have been reformatted for clarity. Similarities with Previous Studies Examining the Effects of Stress & Glucocorticoids Some of our DEGs showed effects resembling those reported in previous meta-analyses examining the effects of chronic stress on the PFC transcriptome. For example, a meta-analysis of the effects of 10 days of CSDS (( Reshetnikov et al., 2022 ): n =56) provided results for 1968 genes surviving a nominal p <0.05 threshold, including 21 of our 133 DEGs. For these 21 genes, there was a strong positive correlation with the Log2FCs from our meta-analysis ( R =0.73, p =0.000147; Rho =0.78, p =4.32e-05, Figure 5A ), despite minimal overlap in included samples (15%: n =18 of our 117 subjects). Whether this strong positive correlation would persist for our DEGs with unavailable results is unknown. This study also included a smaller meta-analysis comparing the subset of animals identified as stress susceptible vs. stress resilient (( Reshetnikov et al., 2022 ): n =18 subjects) which provided results for 2614 genes that survived a nominal p<0.05 threshold, including 30 of our 133 DEGs. For these 30 genes, there was also a strong positive correlation with the Log2FCs from our chronic stress meta-analysis (R=0.74, p=3.05e-06, Rho=0.77, p=2.16e-06, Figure 5C ), providing preliminary evidence suggesting that susceptible animals may have generalized stress effects in the PFC that are amplified compared to resilient animals. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 5. The DEGs from our current meta-analysis show similar effects in previous large studies characterizing the effects of chronic stress and glucocorticoids on the brain transcriptome. A-D: Scatterplots illustrate the correlation between the effects of chronic stress within our meta-analysis (Log2FC: x-axis) and the effects of stress within previous studies (Log2FC: y-axis) for any of our 133 identified DEGs (FDR<0.05) that had results available in the referenced publication. Data points are shaded grey if the effects within the previous publication were nominally significant (p<0.05). Trend lines illustrate the relationship between the two sets of results as identified by simple linear regression. A. Differential expression results were available for 21 of our DEGs within a previously published meta-analysis of the effects of 10 days of CSDS on the PFC (( Reshetnikov et al., 2022 ): n=56 subjects, only nominally significant results available). For these genes, there was a strong positive correlation with the Log2FCs in our meta-analysis (R=0.73, Rho=0.78). B. Differential expression results were available for 14 of our DEGs within a small previously published meta-analysis of the effects of 30 days of CSDS on the PFC (( Reshetnikov et al., 2022 ): n=20 subjects, only nominally significant results available). For these genes, there was minimal correlation between the Log2FCs from the two meta-analyses (R=-0.021, Rho=0.068). C. Differential expression results were available for 30 of our DEGs within a small previously published meta-analysis comparing animals identified as stress susceptible vs. stress resilient (( Reshetnikov et al., 2022 ): n=18 subjects, only nominally significant results available). For these genes, there was a strong positive correlation with the Log2FCs from our chronic stress meta-analysis (R=0.74, Rho=0.77). D. Differential expression results were available for 110 of our DEGs within a large study of the effects of chronic daily corticosterone on the hippocampal transcriptome (( Juszczak et al., 2025 ): n=48 subjects). For these genes, there was a small positive correlation with the Log2FCs in our meta-analysis (R=0.13, Rho=0.31). E. Differential expression results were available for 92 of our DEGs within a meta-analysis of the long-term effects of early life stress on the prefrontal transcriptome (( Duan et al., 2025 ): n=89 subjects). For these genes, there was a positive correlation with the Log2FCs in our meta-analysis (R=0.52, Rho=0.35). Similar parallels were not observed with the results from a small meta-analysis of the effects of 30 days of CSDS (( Reshetnikov et al., 2022 ), n =20). Only 14 DEGs from our meta-analysis were represented in their provided results (3132 genes surviving a p <0.05 threshold), and their associated Log2FCs showed minimal correlation with our findings ( R =-0.021, p =0.944; Rho =0.068, p =0.820, Figure 5B ). We also observed limited overlap with the results from a meta-analysis of the effects of chronic stress more broadly defined (CSDS, CUMS, or chronic restraint) (( Gururajan, 2022 ), n =101). For this study, only results for genes surviving a stricter FDR<0.05 threshold were available (160 genes), of which only one ( Xdh ) was included in our DEGs, making comparison difficult. We were able to more unambiguously document a positive correlation with results from large studies related to chronic stress with result reporting for more genes. For example, results were available for 92 of our DEGs within a meta-analysis of the long-term effects of early life stress on the prefrontal transcriptome (( Duan et al., 2025 ): n =89), eleven of which showed nominal significance ( p <0.05). The Log2FCs for these genes correlated positively with the Log2FCs in our meta-analysis (92 genes: R =0.52, p =1.44e-07; Rho =0.35, p =0.000795, Figure 5E ). Our results were also weakly correlated with the effects of chronic daily corticosterone on the hippocampal transcriptome (( Juszczak et al., 2025 ): n =48, Figure 5D ), with 110 of our genes represented in their results, 48 of which showed nominal significance ( p <0.05). For these genes, the Log2FCs showed a small positive correlation with the Log2FCs in our meta-analysis (110 genes: R =0.13, p =0.179; Rho =0.31, p =0.00103). Additional DEGs had previous relationships with chronic stress (either medium duration or prolonged stress) documented in a large review of the literature characterizing the effects of stress on the brain transcriptome (Stankiewicz et al., 2022) ( Table S3 ). Altogether, these comparisons suggest that our findings add to a growing body of results documenting the effects of stress on brain gene expression. Similarities with Previous Studies Examining the Effects of Stress-Related Psychiatric Disorders Chronic stress contributes to the onset and the exacerbation of many psychiatric disorders ( Davis et al., 2017 ) and can induce anxiety-like and depression-like behaviors in animals ( Deslauriers et al., 2018 ; Gyles et al., 2024 ). Chronic stress is also a consistent feature of life with a serious psychiatric disorder. Therefore, we decided to compare our meta-analysis results to previous findings from subjects with a variety of psychiatric disorders. We found that some of our DEGs showed effects resembling those reported in previous meta-analyses examining the effects of stress-related psychiatric disorders on the PFC transcriptome. Of 221 genes previously found to be differentially expressed in meta-analyses of the effects of suicide in the PFC ( Piras et al., 2022 ), seven were amongst our 133 DEGs, all of which showed the same direction of effect. Amongst 40 genes that had previously shown consistent differential expression in association with PTSD in the PFC (Stankiewicz et al., 2022), three were amongst our DEGs, all of which also showed the same direction of effect. When examining the Log2FCs for our DEGs, we also found a consistent positive correlation with the Log2FCs identified in previous meta-analyses examining the effects of multiple psychiatric disorders on the cortex, more broadly defined ( Figure 6 ). Across diagnoses, this relationship appeared to be primarily driven by a small group of downregulated IEGs, such that the strong correlations disappeared when using non-parametric methods. This included effects of Alcohol Abuse Disorder (AAD, n =32, Figure 6A ), MDD ( n =176, Figure 6B ), Bipolar Disorder (BPD, n =197, Figure 6C ), and Schizophrenia (SCHIZ, n =314, Figure 6E ) in the cortex as measured by microarray (( Gandal et al., 2018 ), MDD: R =0.32, p =0.0011, Rho =0.04, p =0.702, 20 of 102 genes p <0.05; BPD: R =0.22, p =0.0655 *trend , Rho =-0.074, p =0.531, 26 of 74 genes p <0.05; SCHIZ : R =0.40, p =0.000363; Rho =0.11, p =0.314; 35 of 74 genes p <0.05; AAD: R =0.21, p =0.0368, Rho =0.15, p =0.142, 18 of 98 genes p <0.05), and effects of BPD ( n =171, Figure 6D ) and SCHIZ ( n =384, Figure 6F ) on the frontal cortex as measured by RNA-Seq (( Gandal et al., 2018 ), BPD: R =0.58, p =7.60e-09; Rho =0.11, p =0.328; 15 of 85 genes p <0.05; SCHIZ: R =0.37, p =0.000505; Rho =0.033, p =0.766; 23 of 85 genes p <0.05). In contrast, the DEGs driving the correlations between our meta-analysis results and other animal chronic stress studies, and similarities with PTSD and Suicide effects in the PFC, seemed to more closely reflect glial dysregulation ( Table S3 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 6. Some of the DEGs from our current meta-analysis show similar effects in previous large studies characterizing the effects of psychiatric disorders on the cortical transcriptome. A-F) Scatterplots illustrate the correlation between the effects of chronic stress within our meta-analysis (Log2FC: x-axis) and the effects of multiple psychiatric disorders in previous studies (Log2FC: y-axis) for any of our 133 identified DEGs (FDR<0.05) that had results available in the referenced publication. Data points are shaded grey if the effects within the previous publication were nominally significant (p<0.05). Trend lines illustrate the relationship between the two sets of results as identified by simple linear regression. Across diagnoses, these positive findings appeared to be primarily driven by a small group of downregulated IEGs, such that the strong correlations typically disappeared when using non-parametric methods. A-C, E) These scatterplots illustrate the relationship between the effects of chronic stress within our meta-analysis and the effects of each psychiatric disorder on the cortical transcriptome as measured by microarray ( Gandal et al., 2018 ). Note that the Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia meta-analyses share overlapping control subjects and thus cannot be considered fully independent. D, F) These scatterplots illustrate the relationship between the effects of chronic stress within our meta-analysis and the effects of each psychiatric disorder on the frontal cortical transcriptome as measured by RNA-Seq ( Gandal et al., 2018 ). Note that the Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia meta-analyses share overlapping control subjects and thus cannot be considered fully independent. A) Alcohol Abuse Disorder (n=32: R=0.21, Rho=0.15), B) MDD (n=176: R=0.32, Rho=0.04), C) Bipolar Disorder (n=197: R=0.22, Rho=-0.074), D) Bipolar Disorder (n=171: R=0.58, Rho=0.11), E) Schizophrenia (n=314: R=0.40, Rho=0.11), F) Schizophrenia (n=384: R=0.37, Rho= 0.033). Discussion Our results documenting the effects of chronic stress on prefrontal gene expression add to growing evidence that the PFC remains plastic and vulnerable to stress into adulthood ( Algaidi, 2025 ). To identify effects of chronic stress that were consistent across laboratories and models, we performed a meta-analysis of six independent mouse studies using chronic social defeat (CSDS) and chronic unpredictable stress (CUMS) paradigms (total n =117). Across studies 97 transcripts were consistently downregulated and 36 upregulated. The downregulated genes were highly enriched for markers of glial cells (especially astrocytes and oligodendrocytes), neurovasculature, myelination, and inflammatory or immune processes, suggesting that chronic stress broadly disrupts glial and vascular support functions in the PFC in a manner that seems to parallel previous observations from the PFC of patients with stress-related disorders such as PTSD and suicide. We also observed consistent down-regulation of IEGs across multiple datasets, paralleling what has been observed in broader cortical dissections from patients with multiple human neuropsychiatric disorders, including those that are traditionally considered stress-related (MDD) as well as those that are accompanied and exacerbated by chronic stress (AAD, BPD, SCHIZ). Astrocyte and Neurovascular Function Our meta-analysis revealed that chronic stress causes consistent down-regulation of gene sets associated with astrocytic function and neurovascular integrity in the PFC, with Aqp4 , S100b, and Hepacam amongst the leading contributors. Evidence from both clinical and preclinical studies supports the down-regulation of these genes under chronic stress. Aqp4 encodes aquaporin-4, a water channel protein enriched in astrocytic endfeet that is related to blood-brain barrier water homeostasis and glymphatic clearance ( Mader & Brimberg, 2019 , Papadopoulos & Verkman, 2013 ). Similar to our results, Aqp4 was downregulated in the anterior cortex of mice following CUMS ( Wei et al., 2019 ) and in the hippocampus following chronic corticosterone ( Juszczak et al., 2025 ). This finding may be clinically relevant, as AQP4 expression is reduced in the post-mortem orbitofrontal cortex ( Rajkowska et al., 2013 ) and hippocampus ( Medina et al., 2016 ) of patients with MDD, and in the PFC of subjects who died of suicide ( Piras et al., 2022 ). Gene expression related to astrocyte development was downregulated. S100b is an astrocyte-derived calcium binding protein that promotes glial and neuronal proliferation, survival, and differentiation ( Hernández-Ortega et al., 2024 ). Similar to our results, CUMS reduced S100b mRNA and associated protein in the PFC ( Bollinger et al., 2025 ; Luo et al., 2010 ), resembling the down-regulation produced by chronic corticosterone ( Juszczak et al., 2025 ). Hepacam encodes an astroglial adhesion molecule regulating astrocyte territory and morphological complexity ( Baldwin et al., 2021 ). Hepacam expression in the PFC has not been previously linked to chronic stress. However, Hepacam is sensitive to glucocorticoids ( Juszczak & Stankiewicz, 2018 ) and HEPACAM shows a gene-based association with suicidality, moderated by environmental factors ( Wendt et al., 2021 ). The down-regulation of S100b and Hepacam we observed may indicate stress-induced astrocytic structural remodeling. Disrupted astrocytic and neurovascular gene expression following chronic stress may underlie impaired astrocyte network function. Prior work shows that chronic stress induces astrocytic atrophy without reducing cell number ( Tynan et al., 2013 ), weakening astrocyte syncytial networks ( Aten et al., 2023 ), dysregulating astrocyte-neuron metabolic coupling ( Descalzi, 2020 ); and altering blood-brain barrier integrity ( Dudek et al., 2020 ; Menard et al., 2017 ). These mechanisms are increasingly thought to be related to mood disorders (e.g, ( Nestler & Russo, 2024 )). Oligodendrocytes Chronic stress produced down-regulation in gene sets representing mature oligodendrocytes, oligodendrocyte precursor cells, and myelination processes in the PFC. This included down-regulation of two enzymes, Fa2h and Elovl5, that are responsible for the synthesis of critical myelin components ( Hoxha et al., 2021 ; Potter et al., 2011 ). Consistent with our results, Fa2h was downregulated in the hippocampus following chronic corticosterone ( Juszczak et al., 2025 ), and in the PFC following CSDS ( Cathomas et al., 2019 ) in stress susceptible animals ( Reshetnikov et al., 2022 ), and also potentially after early life stress ( Duan et al., 2025 ). Elovl5 was also down-regulated following chronic corticosterone ( Juszczak et al., 2025 ). These findings could be clinically important, as Fa2h was decreased in patients with PTSD ( Stankiewicz et al., 2022a ), and ELOVL5 is reduced in the postmortem frontal cortex in patients with MDD ( McNamara & Liu, 2011 ), alcohol abuse disorder ( Gandal et al., 2018 ), and suicide ( Piras et al., 2022 ). These molecular changes align with a broader pattern of oligodendrocyte and myelination abnormalities reported in the PFC of stressed animals ( Laine et al., 2018 ; Lehmann et al., 2017 ) and patients with stress-related disorders, including MDD and BD ( Czéh & Nagy, 2018 ). Glial Communication Chronic stress suppressed genes related to glial communication, including P2rx7 . P2rx7 encodes a purinergic receptor, P2X7R, that is activated by stress-elevated extracellular ATP, triggering downstream neuroinflammation linked to depression ( Adinolfi et al., 2018 ; von Muecke-Heim et al., 2021 ). In chronic stress models, P2X7R antagonists consistently blunted depressive-like behaviors and reversed immune changes ( Ribeiro et al., 2019 ). P2rx7 down-regulation in our meta-analysis and in patients with MDD ( Aston et al., 2005 ) might reflect a homeostatic or compensatory response to chronic overstimulation of this pathway, limiting excessive inflammation. Overall, the down-regulation of multiple glial-driven gene sets suggests that chronic stress may alter glial-neuron communication and neuroimmune signaling within PFC circuits. Immediate Early Genes Chronic stress suppressed immediate early genes (IEGs) linked to neuronal activity and plasticity, such as Fos , Junb , Arc , Egr1, and Dusp1 ( Figure 4 ) ( Abate et al., 1991 ; Chen et al., 2019 ; Korb & Finkbeiner, 2011 ). A comprehensive review reported that these IEGs are reliably induced by acute stressors but down-regulated after chronic stress across multiple regions, including the hippocampus and PFC ( Flati et al., 2020 ) in a manner important for social behavioral stress responses in susceptible animals ( Inaba et al., 2023 ). However, this down-regulation of IEGs following chronic stress may be context dependent, as some studies have found the opposite pattern ( e.g., ( Deonaraine et al., 2020 ; Zhao et al., 2017 ), Fig S2 C&D ). As a similar down-regulation of IEG expression was observed in the cortex across a variety of psychiatric disorders, including alcohol abuse disorder, MDD, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia ( Gandal et al., 2018 ), this complex relationship between IEG expression and chronic stress is worth investigating further. Upregulation of Xdh Finally, we observed an upregulation of Xdh that was consistent with nominal findings from other meta-analyses of chronic stress ( Gururajan, 2022 ; Reshetnikov et al., 2022 ) and stress susceptibility ( Reshetnikov et al., 2022 ), and large studies of chronic corticosterone ( Juszczak et al., 2025 ) and prolonged stress ( Stankiewicz et al., 2022a ). Upregulation of Xdh was also associated with schizophrenia ( Gandal et al., 2018 ) ( Table S3 ). Xdh encodes the protein xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR), the terminal enzyme of purine catabolism ( Furuhashi, 2020 ). Chronic stress increases cortical XOR activity, resulting in cerebrovascular dysfunction and cognitive deficits ( Burrage et al., 2023 ). Upregulation of Xdh following chronic stress exposure may similarly promote a shift towards increased oxidative stress at the neurovascular interface. Strengths and Limitations Compared to the original studies, our meta-analysis provides greater statistical power, allowing more robust identification of DEGs, and better generalizability of findings. However, our analysis has several limitations. First, the limited number of comparisons between stress susceptible and resilient groups did not allow us to properly examine how stress susceptibility affects PFC gene expression. However, a recent meta-analysis of CSDS effects on the PFC did pursue this question ( Reshetnikov et al., 2022 ). When compared with our meta-analysis, their results suggest that susceptible animals may have generalized stress effects that are amplified compared to resilient animals, such as greater down-regulation of myelin-related genes ( Reshetnikov et al., 2022 ). These findings are an interesting complement to previous work, which revealed active compensatory mechanisms bolstering stress resilience ( Nestler & Russo, 2024 ). Second, behavioral responses to chronic stress have been shown to be sex-specific (e.g., ( Hodes et al., 2015 )). Since our datasets were derived predominantly from male mice, our findings may be limited to males. To explore this possibility, we conducted a small follow-up analysis comparing our meta-analysis results to published differential expression results broken down by sex ( Deonaraine et al., 2020 ; Labonté et al., 2017 ; Shao et al., 2025 ). These comparisons suggested that the chronic stress DEGs identified by our meta-analysis show similar effects in males and females ( Figure S2 ). However, these conclusions are based on limited published results from small studies and should be followed up with a meta-analysis designed to characterize sex differences. Finally, our findings reflect samples encompassing a variety of prefrontal cortical regions. These regions are likely to serve different roles in stress responses and exhibit prominent variation across species (Preuss & Wise, 2022). They also include a variety of cell types with divergent stress responses (Kwon et al., 2022; Shao et al., 2025 ) which may not be fully reflected in our results derived from bulk dissections. Future research will be necessary to explore the regional and cell type specificity of our identified effects. Conclusion Chronic stress is a significant public health concern in the United States, contributing to the onset and exacerbation of psychiatric conditions ( Davis et al., 2017 ). Human studies often have modest effect sizes and complex designs, making it difficult to identify targets. By releasing our full meta-analysis results (Table S1 : 21,379 genes, with 133 DEGs) and gene set enrichment results ( Table S2 : 10,847 gene sets, 53 with FDR<0.05), we provide a useful reference database that can be compared to the transcriptional profiling results from psychiatric and neurological conditions to distinguish stress-associated factors. Moreover, our convergent analyses with prior human transcriptomic reports highlighted patterns that are consistent across species, providing insight for mechanistic and translational follow-up. CRediT Statement JX: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing, Visualization MHH: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing, Validation, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration CAR: Methodology, Writing - Review & Editing NRC: Writing - Review & Editing EIF: Methodology, Writing - Review & Editing EH: Methodology, Writing - Review & Editing DMN: Methodology, Writing - Review & Editing AS: Methodology, Writing - Review & Editing TQD: Writing - Review & Editing SJW: Writing - Review & Editing, Funding acquisition HA: Writing - Review & Editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition Competing Interests The authors declare no potential conflict of interests. Several authors are members of the Pritzker Neuropsychiatric Disorders Research Consortium (MHH, HA, SJW), which is supported by the Pritzker Neuropsychiatric Disorders Research Fund L.L.C. A shared intellectual property agreement exists between this philanthropic fund and the University of Michigan, Stanford University, the Weill Medical College of Cornell University, the University of California at Irvine, and the HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology to encourage the development of appropriate findings for research and clinical applications. Data Availability Statement All datasets used in this publication are publicly available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) repository Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ ) under the accession numbers GSE84572, GSE109315, GSE81672, GSE81587, GSE102556, and GSE151807. Acknowledgements This work was completed as part of the Brain Data Alchemy Project and supported by the Hope for Depression Research Foundation (HDRF: HA), Grinnell College Center for Careers, Life, and Service (JX, CAR, EH, DMN, TQD), the International Brain Research Organization (IBRO) and Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience (FUN) (DMN, TQD), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA U01 DA043098: HA & SJW), and the Pritzker Neuropsychiatric Disorders Research Foundation (HA & SJW). Funders and sponsors had no active role in the review. Funder Information Declared Hope for Depression Research Foundation, https://ror.org/01mcwn339 , NA Grinnell College Center for Careers, Life, and Service , NA International Brain Research Organization, https://ror.org/0040b6869 , NA Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience , NA National Institute on Drug Abuse , NIDA U01 DA043098 Pritzker Neuropsychiatric Disorders Research Foundation , NA Footnotes ↵ * Shared first authorship This manuscript has been revised to include several follow-up exploratory analyses comparing our findings to previous studies examining the effects of stress susceptibility and sex differences in stress responses on gene expression in the prefrontal cortex. We have also added documentation and clarification to methods and results, and provided additional interpretation in the discussion section. http://github.com/Jinglin0320/Metaanalysis_GemmaOutput_CSDS_PFC_Jinglin http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE84572 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE109315 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE81672 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE81587 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE102556 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE151807 http://www.protocols.io/view/brain-data-alchemy-project-meta-analysis-of-re-ana-j8nlk84jxl5r/v1 References ↵ Abate , C. , Luk , D. , & Curran , T . ( 1991 ). Transcriptional regulation by Fos and Jun in vitro: Interaction among multiple activator and regulatory domains . Molecular and Cellular Biology , 11 ( 7 ), 3624 – 3632 . doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.7.3624-3632.1991 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Adinolfi , E. , Giuliani , A. L. , De Marchi , E. , Pegoraro , A. , Orioli , E. , & Di Virgilio , F. ( 2018 ). The P2X7 receptor: A main player in inflammation . Biochemical Pharmacology , 151 , 234 – 244 . doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.12.021 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Algaidi , S. A . ( 2025 ). Chronic stress-induced neuroplasticity in the prefrontal cortex: Structural, functional, and molecular mechanisms from development to aging . Brain Research , 1851 , 149461 . doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149461 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Arnsten , A. F. T . ( 2009 ). Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function . Nature Reviews Neuroscience , 10 ( 6 ), 410 – 422 . doi: 10.1038/nrn2648 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Aston , C. , Jiang , L. , & Sokolov , B. P . ( 2005 ). Transcriptional profiling reveals evidence for signaling and oligodendroglial abnormalities in the temporal cortex from patients with major depressive disorder . Molecular Psychiatry , 10 ( 3 ), 309 – 322 . doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001565 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Aten , S. , Du , Y. , Taylor , O. , Dye , C. , Collins , K. , Thomas , M. , Kiyoshi , C. , & Zhou , M . ( 2023 ). Chronic Stress Impairs the Structure and Function of Astrocyte Networks in an Animal Model of Depression . Neurochemical Research , 48 ( 4 ), 1191 – 1210 . doi: 10.1007/s11064-022-03663-4 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Bagot , R. C. , Cates , H. M. , Purushothaman , I. , Lorsch , Z. S. , Walker , D. M. , Wang , J. , Huang , X. , Schlüter , O. M. , Maze , I. , Peña , C. J. , Heller , E. A. , Issler , O. , Wang , M. , Song , W. , Stein , Jason. L. , Liu , X. , Doyle , M. A. , Scobie , K. N. , Sun , H. S. , … Nestler , E. J. ( 2016 ). Circuit-wide Transcriptional Profiling Reveals Brain Region-Specific Gene Networks Regulating Depression Susceptibility . Neuron , 90 ( 5 ), 969 – 983 . doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.015 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Bagot , R. C. , Cates , H. M. , Purushothaman , I. , Vialou , V. , Heller , E. A. , Yieh , L. , LaBonté , B. , Peña , C. J. , Shen , L. , Wittenberg , G. M. , & Nestler , E. J . ( 2017 ). Ketamine and Imipramine Reverse Transcriptional Signatures of Susceptibility and Induce Resilience-Specific Gene Expression Profiles . Biological Psychiatry , 81 ( 4 ), 285 – 295 . doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.012 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Baldwin , K. T. , Tan , C. X. , Strader , S. T. , Jiang , C. , Savage , J. T. , Elorza-Vidal , X. , Contreras , X. , Rülicke , T. , Hippenmeyer , S. , Estévez , R. , Ji , R.-R. , & Eroglu , C . ( 2021 ). HepaCAM controls astrocyte self-organization and coupling . Neuron , 109 ( 15 ), 2427 – 2442 .e10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.05.025 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Becker , M. , Pinhasov , A. , & Ornoy , A . ( 2021 ). Animal Models of Depression: What Can They Teach Us about the Human Disease? Diagnostics , 11 ( 1 ), 123 . doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11010123 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Bollinger , J. L. , Johnsamuel , S. , Vollmer , L. L. , Kuhn , A. M. , & Wohleb , E. S . ( 2025 ). Stress-induced dysfunction of neurovascular astrocytes in the prefrontal cortex contributes to sex-dependent deficits in cognition and behavior . Molecular Psychiatry , 1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-02993-3 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Burrage , E. N. , Coblentz , T. , Prabhu , S. S. , Childers , R. , Bryner , R. W. , Lewis , S. E. , DeVallance , E. , Kelley , E. E. , & Chantler , P. D . ( 2023 ). Xanthine oxidase mediates chronic stress-induced cerebrovascular dysfunction and cognitive impairment . Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism , 43 ( 6 ), 905 – 920 . doi: 10.1177/0271678X231152551 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Button , K. S. , Ioannidis , J. P. A. , Mokrysz , C. , Nosek , B. A. , Flint , J. , Robinson , E. S. J. , & Munafò , M. R . ( 2013 ). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience . Nature Reviews Neuroscience , 14 ( 5 ), 365 – 376 . doi: 10.1038/nrn3475 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Cathomas , F. , Azzinnari , D. , Bergamini , G. , Sigrist , H. , Buerge , M. , Hoop , V. , Wicki , B. , Goetze , L. , Soares , S. , Kukelova , D. , Seifritz , E. , Goebbels , S. , Nave , K.-A. , Ghandour , M. S. , Seoighe , C. , Hildebrandt , T. , Leparc , G. , Klein , H. , Stupka , E. , … Pryce , C. R. ( 2019 ). Oligodendrocyte gene expression is reduced by and influences effects of chronic social stress in mice . Genes, Brain and Behavior , 18 ( 1 ), e12475 . doi: 10.1111/gbb.12475 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Chae , S. , Hong , J. , Kang , K. , Shin , A. , Kim , D.-G. , Lee , S. , Kim , M.-Y. , Jung , I. , & Kim , D . ( 2021 ). Molecular laterality encodes stress susceptibility in the medial prefrontal cortex . Molecular Brain , 14 ( 1 ), 92 . doi: 10.1186/s13041-021-00802-w OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Chen , H.-F. , Chuang , H.-C. , & Tan , T.-H . ( 2019 ). Regulation of Dual-Specificity Phosphatase (DUSP) Ubiquitination and Protein Stability . International Journal of Molecular Sciences , 20 ( 11 ), 2668 . doi: 10.3390/ijms20112668 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Clinton , S. M. , Unroe , K. A. , Shupe , E. A. , McCoy , C. R. , & Glover , M. E . ( 2022 ). Resilience to Stress: Lessons from Rodents about Nature versus Nurture. The Neuroscientist: A Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology , Neurology and Psychiatry , 28 ( 3 ), 283 – 298 . doi: 10.1177/1073858421989357 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Czéh , B. , & Nagy , S. A . ( 2018 ). Clinical Findings Documenting Cellular and Molecular Abnormalities of Glia in Depressive Disorders . Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience , 11 . doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00056 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Davis , M. T. , Holmes , S. E. , Pietrzak , R. H. , & Esterlis , I . ( 2017 ). Neurobiology of Chronic Stress-Related Psychiatric Disorders: Evidence from Molecular Imaging Studies. Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks , Calif .) , 1 , 2470547017710916 . doi: 10.1177/2470547017710916 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Deonaraine , K. K. , Wang , Q. , Cheng , H. , Chan , K. L. , Lin , H.-Y. , Liu , K. , Parise , L. F. , Cathomas , F. , Leclair , K. B. , Flanigan , M. E. , Li , L. , Aleyasin , H. , Guevara , C. , Hao , K. , Zhang , B. , Russo , S. J. , & Wang , J . ( 2020 ). Sex-specific peripheral and central responses to stress-induced depression and treatment in a mouse model . Journal of Neuroscience Research , 98 ( 12 ), 2541 – 2553 . doi: 10.1002/jnr.24724 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Descalzi , G . ( 2020 ). Cortical Astrocyte-neuronal Metabolic Coupling Emerges as a Critical Modulator of Stress-induced Hopelessness . Neuroscience Bulletin , 37 ( 1 ), 132 – 134 . doi: 10.1007/s12264-020-00559-7 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Deslauriers , J. , Toth , M. , Der-Avakian , A. , & Risbrough , V. B . ( 2018 ). Current Status of Animal Models of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Behavioral and Biological Phenotypes, and Future Challenges in Improving Translation . Biological Psychiatry , 83 ( 10 ), 895 – 907 . doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.11.019 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Diessler , S. , Jan , M. , Emmenegger , Y. , Guex , N. , Middleton , B. , Skene , D. J. , Ibberson , M. , Burdet , F. , Götz , L. , Pagni , M. , Sankar , M. , Liechti , R. , Hor , C. N. , Xenarios , I. , & Franken , P . ( 2018 ). A systems genetics resource and analysis of sleep regulation in the mouse . PLOS Biology , 16 ( 8 ), e2005750 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005750 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ DiSabato , D. J. , Nemeth , D. P. , Liu , X. , Witcher , K. G. , O’Neil , S. M. , Oliver , B. , Bray , C. E. , Sheridan , J. F. , Godbout , J. P. , & Quan , N . ( 2021 ). Interleukin-1 receptor on hippocampal neurons drives social withdrawal and cognitive deficits after chronic social stress . Molecular Psychiatry , 26 ( 9 ), 4770 – 4782 . doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0788-3 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Duan , T. Q. , Hagenauer , M. H. , Flandreau , E. I. , Bader , A. , Nguyen , D. M. , Maras , P. M. , Lima , R. M. S. D. , Gyles , T. , Mclain , C. , Meaney , M. J. , Nestler , E. J. , Watson , S. J. , & Akil , H . ( 2025 ). A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Early Life Stress on the Prefrontal Cortex Transcriptome Reveals Long-Term Downregulation of Myelin-Related Gene Expression . Brain and Behavior , 15 ( 6 ), e70608 . doi: 10.1002/brb3.70608 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Dudek , K. A. , Dion-Albert , L. , Lebel , M. , LeClair , K. , Labrecque , S. , Tuck , E. , Ferrer Perez , C. , Golden , S. A. , Tamminga , C. , Turecki , G. , Mechawar , N. , Russo , S. J. , & Menard , C . ( 2020 ). Molecular adaptations of the blood–brain barrier promote stress resilience vs. Depression . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 117 ( 6 ), 3326 – 3336 . doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914655117 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Flati , T. , Gioiosa , S. , Chillemi , G. , Mele , A. , Oliverio , A. , Mannironi , C. , Rinaldi , A. , & Castrignanò , T . ( 2020 ). A gene expression atlas for different kinds of stress in the mouse brain . Scientific Data , 7 ( 1 ), 437 . doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-00772-z OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Furuhashi , M . ( 2020 ). New insights into purine metabolism in metabolic diseases: Role of xanthine oxidoreductase activity . American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism , 319 ( 5 ), E827 – E834 . doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00378.2020 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Gandal , M. J. , Haney , J. R. , Parikshak , N. N. , Leppa , V. , Ramaswami , G. , Hartl , C. , Schork , A. J. , Appadurai , V. , Buil , A. , Werge , T. M. , Liu , C. , White , K. P. , CommonMind Consortium , PsychENCODE Consortium , iPSYCH-BROAD Working Group , Horvath , S. , & Geschwind , D. H. ( 2018 ). Shared molecular neuropathology across major psychiatric disorders parallels polygenic overlap . Science (New York, N.Y.) , 359 ( 6376 ), 693 – 697 . doi: 10.1126/science.aad6469 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Gray , J. R. , Braver , T. S. , & Raichle , M. E . ( 2002 ). Integration of emotion and cognition in the lateral prefrontal cortex . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 99 ( 6 ), 4115 – 4120 . doi: 10.1073/pnas.062381899 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Gui , S. , Liu , Y. , Pu , J. , Song , X. , Chen , X. , Chen , W. , Zhong , X. , Wang , H. , Liu , L. , & Xie , P . ( 2021 ). Comparative analysis of hippocampal transcriptional features between major depressive disorder patients and animal models . Journal of Affective Disorders , 293 , 19 – 28 . doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.007 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Gururajan , A . ( 2022 ). The impact of chronic stress on the PFC transcriptome: A bioinformatic meta-analysis of publicly available RNA-sequencing datasets . Stress (Amsterdam, Netherlands) , 25 ( 1 ), 305 – 312 . doi: 10.1080/10253890.2022.2111211 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Gyles , T. M. , Nestler , E. J. , & Parise , E. M . ( 2024 ). Advancing preclinical chronic stress models to promote therapeutic discovery for human stress disorders . Neuropsychopharmacology , 49 ( 1 ), 215 – 226 . doi: 10.1038/s41386-023-01625-0 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Hagenauer , M. H. , Sannah , Y. , Hebda-Bauer , E. K. , Rhoads , C. , O’Connor , A. M. , Flandreau , E. , Watson , S. J. , & Akil , H . ( 2024 ). Resource: A curated database of brain-related functional gene sets (Brain.GMT) . MethodsX , 13 , 102788 . doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.102788 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Hagenauer , M. , Rhoads , C. , Xiong , J. , Nguyen , D. M. , Hernandez , E. , Saffron , A. , Kondur , A. , & Flandreau , E . ( 2024 , August 22 ). Brain Data Alchemy Project: Meta-Analysis of Re-Analyzed Public Transcriptional Profiling Data in the Gemma Database . Protocols.io. doi: 10.17504/protocols.io.j8nlk84jxl5r/v1 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Hernández-Ortega , K. , Canul-Euan , A. A. , Solis-Paredes , J. M. , Borboa-Olivares , H. , Reyes-Muñoz , E. , Estrada-Gutierrez , G. , & Camacho-Arroyo , I . ( 2024 ). S100B actions on glial and neuronal cells in the developing brain: An overview . Frontiers in Neuroscience , 18 . doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1425525 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Hicks , S. C. , Townes , F. W. , Teng , M. , & Irizarry , R. A . ( 2018 ). Missing data and technical variability in single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments . Biostatistics , 19 ( 4 ), 562 – 578 . doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx053 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Hodes , G. E. , Pfau , M. L. , Purushothaman , I. , Ahn , H. F. , Golden , S. A. , Christoffel , D. J. , Magida , J. , Brancato , A. , Takahashi , A. , Flanigan , M. E. , Ménard , C. , Aleyasin , H. , Koo , J. W. , Lorsch , Z. S. , Feng , J. , Heshmati , M. , Wang , M. , Turecki , G. , Neve , R. , … Russo , S. J . ( 2015 ). Sex Differences in Nucleus Accumbens Transcriptome Profiles Associated with Susceptibility versus Resilience to Subchronic Variable Stress . Journal of Neuroscience , 35 ( 50 ), 16362 – 16376 . doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1392-15.2015 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Hoxha , E. , Balbo , I. , Parolisi , R. , Audano , M. , Montarolo , F. , Ravera , F. , Guglielmotto , M. , Muratori , L. , Raimondo , S. , DiGregorio , E. , Buffo , A. , Brusco , A. , Borroni , B. , Mitro , N. , Caruso , D. , & Tempia , F . ( 2021 ). Elovl5 is required for proper action potential conduction along peripheral myelinated fibers . Glia , 69 ( 10 ), 2419 – 2428 . doi: 10.1002/glia.24048 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Inaba , H. , Li , H. , Kawatake-Kuno , A. , Dewa , K.-I. , Nagai , J. , Oishi , N. , Murai , T. , & Uchida , S . ( 2023 ). GPCR-mediated calcium and cAMP signaling determines psychosocial stress susceptibility and resiliency . Science Advances , 9 ( 14 ), eade5397 . doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade5397 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Jaszczyk , A. , Stankiewicz , A. M. , Goscik , J. , Majewska , A. , Jezierski , T. , & Juszczak , G. R . ( 2023 ). Overnight Corticosterone and Gene Expression in Mouse Hippocampus: Time Course during Resting Period . International Journal of Molecular Sciences , 24 ( 3 ), 2828 . doi: 10.3390/ijms24032828 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Juszczak , G. R. , & Stankiewicz , A. M . ( 2018 ). Glucocorticoids, genes and brain function . Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry , 82 , 136 – 168 . doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.11.020 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Juszczak , G. R. , Stankiewicz , A. M. , Starzyński , R. R. , Ogłuszka , M. , & Jaszczyk , A . ( 2025 ). Effect of Corticosterone on Gene Expression in the Context of Global Hippocampal Transcription . International Journal of Molecular Sciences , 26 ( 10 ), 4889 . doi: 10.3390/ijms26104889 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Korb , E. , & Finkbeiner , S . ( 2011 ). Arc in synaptic plasticity: From gene to behavior . Trends in Neurosciences , 34 ( 11 ), 591 – 598 . doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.08.007 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Labonté , B. , Engmann , O. , Purushothaman , I. , Menard , C. , Wang , J. , Tan , C. , Scarpa , J. R. , Moy , G. , Loh , Y.-H. E. , Cahill , M. , Lorsch , Z. S. , Hamilton , P. J. , Calipari , E. S. , Hodes , G. E. , Issler , O. , Kronman , H. , Pfau , M. , Obradovic , A. L. J. , Dong , Y. , … Nestler , E. J . ( 2017 ). Sex-specific transcriptional signatures in human depression . Nature Medicine , 23 ( 9 ), 1102 – 1111 . doi: 10.1038/nm.4386 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Laine , M. A. , Trontti , K. , Misiewicz , Z. , Sokolowska , E. , Kulesskaya , N. , Heikkinen , A. , Saarnio , S. , Balcells , I. , Ameslon , P. , Greco , D. , Mattila , P. , Ellonen , P. , Paulin , L. , Auvinen , P. , Jokitalo , E. , & Hovatta , I . ( 2018 ). Genetic Control of Myelin Plasticity after Chronic Psychosocial Stress . eNeuro , 5 ( 4 ), ENEURO.0166-18.2018. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0166-18.2018 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Lehmann , M. L. , Weigel , T. K. , Elkahloun , A. G. , & Herkenham , M . ( 2017 ). Chronic social defeat reduces myelination in the mouse medial prefrontal cortex . Scientific Reports , 7 , 46548 . doi: 10.1038/srep46548 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Lim , N. , Tesar , S. , Belmadani , M. , Poirier-Morency , G. , Mancarci , B. O. , Sicherman , J. , Jacobson , M. , Leong , J. , Tan , P. , & Pavlidis , P . ( 2021 ). Curation of over 10 000 transcriptomic studies to enable data reuse . Database: The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation , 2021 , baab006 . doi: 10.1093/database/baab006 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Luo , K.-R. , Hong , C.-J. , Liou , Y.-J. , Hou , S.-J. , Huang , Y.-H. , & Tsai , S.-J . ( 2010 ). Differential regulation of neurotrophin S100B and BDNF in two rat models of depression . Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry , 34 ( 8 ), 1433 – 1439 . doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.07.033 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Lupien , S. J. , McEwen , B. S. , Gunnar , M. R. , & Heim , C . ( 2009 ). Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition . Nature Reviews. Neuroscience , 10 ( 6 ), 434 – 445 . doi: 10.1038/nrn2639 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Ma , K. , Guo , L. , Xu , A. , Cui , S. , & Wang , J.-H . ( 2016 ). Molecular Mechanism for Stress-Induced Depression Assessed by Sequencing miRNA and mRNA in Medial Prefrontal Cortex . PloS One , 11 ( 7 ), e0159093 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159093 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Mader , S. , & Brimberg , L . ( 2019 ). Aquaporin-4 Water Channel in the Brain and Its Implication for Health and Disease . Cells , 8 ( 2 ), 90 . doi: 10.3390/cells8020090 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ McEwen , B. S. , & Akil , H . ( 2020 ). Revisiting the Stress Concept: Implications for Affective Disorders . The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience , 40 ( 1 ), 12 – 21 . doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0733-19.2019 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ McNamara , R. K. , & Liu , Y . ( 2011 ). Reduced expression of fatty acid biosynthesis genes in the prefrontal cortex of patients with major depressive disorder . Journal of Affective Disorders , 129 ( 1–3 ), 359 – 363 . doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.08.021 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Medina , A. , Watson , S. J. , Bunney , W. , Myers , R. M. , Schatzberg , A. , Barchas , J. , Akil , H. , & Thompson , R. C . ( 2016 ). Evidence for alterations of the glial syncytial function in major depressive disorder . Journal of Psychiatric Research , 72 , 15 – 21 . doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.10.010 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Menard , C. , Pfau , M. L. , Hodes , G. E. , Kana , V. , Wang , V. X. , Bouchard , S. , Takahashi , A. , Flanigan , M. E. , Aleyasin , H. , LeClair , K. B. , Janssen , W. G. , Labonté , B. , Parise , E. M. , Lorsch , Z. S. , Golden , S. A. , Heshmati , M. , Tamminga , C. , Turecki , G. , Campbell , M. , … Russo , S. J . ( 2017 ). Social stress induces neurovascular pathology promoting depression . Nature Neuroscience , 20 ( 12 ), 1752 – 1760 . doi: 10.1038/s41593-017-0010-3 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Musazzi , L. , Mingardi , J. , Ieraci , A. , Barbon , A. , & Popoli , M . ( 2023 ). Stress, microRNAs, and stress-related psychiatric disorders: An overview . Molecular Psychiatry , 28 ( 12 ), 4977 – 4994 . doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02139-3 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Nestler , E. J. , & Hyman , S. E . ( 2010 ). Animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders . Nature Neuroscience , 13 ( 10 ), 1161 – 1169 . doi: 10.1038/nn.2647 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Nestler , E. J. , & Russo , S. J . ( 2024 ). Neurobiological basis of stress resilience . Neuron , 112 ( 12 ), 1911 – 1929 . doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.05.001 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Papadopoulos , M. C. , & Verkman , A. S . ( 2013 ). Aquaporin water channels in the nervous system . Nature Reviews. Neuroscience , 14 ( 4 ), 265 – 277 . doi: 10.1038/nrn3468 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Piras , I. S. , Huentelman , M. J. , Pinna , F. , Paribello , P. , Solmi , M. , Murru , A. , Carpiniello , B. , Manchia , M. , & Zai , C. C . ( 2022 ). A review and meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in suicide . European Neuropsychopharmacology: The Journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology , 56 , 39 – 49 . doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.12.003 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Pollard , K. S. , Dudoit , S. , & Laan , M. J. van der . ( 2005 ). Multiple Testing Procedures: The multtest Package and Applications to Genomics . In Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions Using R and Bioconductor (pp. 249 – 271 ). Springer, New York , NY . doi: 10.1007/0-387-29362-0_15 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Potter , K. A. , Kern , M. J. , Fullbright , G. , Bielawski , J. , Scherer , S. S. , Yum , S. W. , Li , J. J. , Cheng , H. , Han , X. , Venkata , J. K. , Khan , P. A. A. , Rohrer , B. , & Hama , H . ( 2011 ). Central nervous system dysfunction in a mouse model of FA2H deficiency . Glia , 59 ( 7 ), 1009 – 1021 . doi: 10.1002/glia.21172 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Rajkowska , G. , Hughes , J. , Stockmeier , C. A. , Javier Miguel-Hidalgo , J. , & Maciag , D . ( 2013 ). Coverage of Blood Vessels by Astrocytic Endfeet Is Reduced in Major Depressive Disorder . Biological Psychiatry , 73 ( 7 ), 613 – 621 . doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.09.024 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Reshetnikov , V. V. , Kisaretova , P. E. , & Bondar , N. P . ( 2022 ). Transcriptome Alterations Caused by Social Defeat Stress of Various Durations in Mice and Its Relevance to Depression and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Humans: A Meta-Analysis . International Journal of Molecular Sciences , 23 ( 22 ), 13792 . doi: 10.3390/ijms232213792 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Rhoads , C. A. , Hagenauer , M. H. , Xiong , J. , Hernandez , E. , Nguyen , D. M. , Saffron , A. , Flandreau , E. , Watson , S. , & Akil , H . ( 2025 ). A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Acute Sleep Deprivation on the Cortical Transcriptome in Rodent Models . Journal of Sleep Research , e70205 . doi: 10.1111/jsr.70205 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Ribeiro , D. E. , Roncalho , A. L. , Glaser , T. , Ulrich , H. , Wegener , G. , & Joca , S . ( 2019 ). P2X7 Receptor Signaling in Stress and Depression . International Journal of Molecular Sciences , 20 ( 11 ), 2778 . doi: 10.3390/ijms20112778 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Schneiderman , N. , Ironson , G. , & Siegel , S. D . ( 2005 ). Stress and health: Psychological, behavioral, and biological determinants . Annual Review of Clinical Psychology , 1 , 607 – 628 . doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144141 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Sergushichev , A . ( 2016 ). An algorithm for fast preranked gene set enrichment analysis using cumulative statistic calculation . bioRxiv , 060012 . doi: 10.1101/060012 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Shao , M. , Botvinov , J. , Banerjee , D. , Girirajan , S. , & Lüscher , B . ( 2025 ). Transcriptome signatures of the medial prefrontal cortex underlying GABAergic control of resilience to chronic stress exposure . Molecular Psychiatry , 30 ( 5 ), 2197 – 2209 . doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02832-x OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Stankiewicz , A. M. , Jaszczyk , A. , Goscik , J. , & Juszczak , G. R . ( 2022a ). Stress and the brain transcriptome: Identifying commonalities and clusters in standardized data from published experiments . Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry , 119 , 110558 . doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110558 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Stankiewicz , A. M. , Jaszczyk , A. , Goscik , J. , & Juszczak , G. R . ( 2022b ). Stress and the brain transcriptome: Identifying commonalities and clusters in standardized data from published experiments . Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry , 119 , 110558 . doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110558 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Touchant , M. , & Labonté , B . ( 2022 ). Sex-Specific Brain Transcriptional Signatures in Human MDD and Their Correlates in Mouse Models of Depression . Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience , 16 , 845491 . doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.845491 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Tynan , R. J. , Beynon , S. B. , Hinwood , M. , Johnson , S. J. , Nilsson , M. , Woods , J. J. , & Walker , F. R . ( 2013 ). Chronic stress-induced disruption of the astrocyte network is driven by structural atrophy and not loss of astrocytes . Acta Neuropathologica , 126 ( 1 ), 75 – 91 . doi: 10.1007/s00401-013-1102-0 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ von Muecke-Heim , I.-A. , Ries , C. , Urbina , L. , & Deussing , J. M. ( 2021 ). P2X7R antagonists in chronic stress-based depression models: A review . European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience , 271 ( 7 ), 1343 – 1358 . doi: 10.1007/s00406-021-01306-3 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Wang , X. , Ma , S. , Mao , M. , Li , C. , Shen , X. , Xu , S. , & Yang , J . ( 2019 ). RNA-Sequencing and Bioinformatics Analysis of Long Noncoding RNAs and mRNAs in the Prefrontal Cortex of Mice Following Repeated Social Defeat Stress . BioMed Research International , 2019 , 7505260 . doi: 10.1155/2019/7505260 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Wei , F. , Song , J. , Zhang , C. , Lin , J. , Xue , R. , Shan , L.-D. , Gong , S. , Zhang , G.-X. , Qin , Z.-H. , Xu , G.-Y. , & Wang , L.-H . ( 2019 ). Chronic stress impairs the aquaporin-4-mediated glymphatic transport through glucocorticoid signaling . Psychopharmacology , 236 ( 4 ), 1367 – 1384 . doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5147-6 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Wendt , F. R. , Pathak , G. A. , Levey , D. F. , Nuñez , Y. Z. , Overstreet , C. , Tyrrell , C. , Adhikari , K. , De Angelis , F. , Tylee , D. S. , Goswami , A. , Krystal , J. H. , Abdallah , C. G. , Stein , M. B. , Kranzler , H. R. , Gelernter , J. , & Polimanti , R. ( 2021 ). Sex-stratified gene-by-environment genome-wide interaction study of trauma, posttraumatic-stress, and suicidality . Neurobiology of Stress , 14 , 100309 . doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100309 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Westfall , S. , Caracci , F. , Estill , M. , Frolinger , T. , Shen , L. , & Pasinetti , G. M . ( 2021 ). Chronic Stress-Induced Depression and Anxiety Priming Modulated by Gut-Brain-Axis Immunity . Frontiers in Immunology , 12 , 670500 . doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.670500 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Yu , S.-L. , Chu , S. S.-T. , Chien , M.-H. , Kuo , P.-H. , Yang , P.-C. , & Su , K.-Y . ( 2021 ). Transthyretin as a Biomarker to Predict and Monitor Major Depressive Disorder Identified by Whole-Genome Transcriptomic Analysis in Mouse Models . Biomedicines , 9 ( 9 ), 1124 . doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9091124 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Zhao , Y. , Wang , S. , Chu , Z. , Dang , Y. , Zhu , J. , & Su , X . ( 2017 ). MicroRNA-101 in the ventrolateral orbital cortex (VLO) modulates depressive-like behaviors in rats and targets dual-specificity phosphatase 1 (DUSP1) . Brain Research , 1669 , 55 – 62 . doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.05.020 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Zoubarev , A. , Hamer , K. M. , Keshav , K. D. , McCarthy , E. L. , Santos , J. R. C. , Van Rossum , T. , McDonald , C. , Hall , A. , Wan , X. , Lim , R. , Gillis , J. , & Pavlidis , P. ( 2012 ). Gemma: A resource for the reuse, sharing and meta-analysis of expression profiling data . Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) , 28 ( 17 ), 2272 – 2273 . doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts430 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted December 16, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Chronic Stress on the Prefrontal Transcriptome in Animal Models and Convergence with Existing Human Data Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Chronic Stress on the Prefrontal Transcriptome in Animal Models and Convergence with Existing Human Data Jinglin Xiong , Megan H. Hagenauer , Cosette A. Rhoads , Elizabeth Flandreau , Nancy Rempel-Clower , Erin Hernandez , Duy Manh Nguyen , Annaka Saffron , Toni Duan , Stanley Watson Jr. , Huda Akil bioRxiv 2025.10.23.683091; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.23.683091 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Chronic Stress on the Prefrontal Transcriptome in Animal Models and Convergence with Existing Human Data Jinglin Xiong , Megan H. Hagenauer , Cosette A. Rhoads , Elizabeth Flandreau , Nancy Rempel-Clower , Erin Hernandez , Duy Manh Nguyen , Annaka Saffron , Toni Duan , Stanley Watson Jr. , Huda Akil bioRxiv 2025.10.23.683091; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.23.683091 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Neuroscience Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7635) Biochemistry (17697) Bioengineering (13895) Bioinformatics (41951) Biophysics (21456) Cancer Biology (18594) Cell Biology (25520) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13381) Ecology (19903) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24323) Genetics (15612) Genomics (22510) Immunology (17738) Microbiology (40401) Molecular Biology (17184) Neuroscience (88622) Paleontology (667) Pathology (2833) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4825) Physiology (7644) Plant Biology (15158) Scientific Communication and Education (2046) Synthetic Biology (4296) Systems Biology (9825) Zoology (2271)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00