Plasma treated cattle slurry with modest fertilizer effect on grass.

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Plasma-based nitrogen enrichment of organic fertilizers is a process that utilizes plasma technology and electricity to infuse liquid biobased fertilizers with atmospheric Nitrogen (N), doubling plant-available N content. The final product is labeled as Nitrogen-Enriched Organic Fertilizer (NEO). This study investigates and compares the applicability of NEO against conventional fertilizers in grass production during 2020-2023 across two regions in Norway. Regarding different fertilizers' N efficacy, in the trials featuring only grasses, applying 210 kg N ha -1 in NEO yielded dry matter (DM) and N yield comparable to those achieved with 149 and 154 kg N ha -1 in mineral fertilizer, respectively. Besides, the untreated cattle slurry and mineral fertilizer combination containing 210 kg N ha -1 resulted in a DM and N yield equivalent to 178 and 180 kg N ha -1 in mineral fertilizer. In the grass-clover mixture trials, NEO and mineral fertilizers reduced the clover content, significantly influencing the overall yield. Merging the results from all trials (2021-2022), it was found that given identical N-min content, standalone mineral fertilizer, and the untreated slurry and mineral fertilizer combination resulted in ~19% and ~28%, and ~14% and ~13.5% higher DM and N yields than NEO, respectively. Further, NEO provided ~9% and ~25% higher DM and N yields than untreated slurry. Notably, NEO's N-min content was nearly double that of untreated slurry (210 vs. 107 kg N ha -1 ). Nonetheless, a supplementary trial (2023) employing different NEO variants with reduced nitrite and elevated nitrate levels returned more promising results than those examined in prior years. Still, ~9% and ~6% less DM and N yield than mineral fertilizer with identical 210 kg N ha -1 content. Our findings suggest that although a considerable N fraction of NEO did not translate to yields compared to other fertilization treatments, and given that NEO is an evolving product, the NEO's enhanced performance in the final study year highlights the necessity for continued research and optimization to fully unlock and utilize the potential advantages of NEO in future agriculture.
Full text 3,341 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Plasma treated cattle slurry with modest fertilizer effect on grass. Abstract Plasma-based nitrogen enrichment of organic fertilizers is a process that utilizes plasma technology and electricity to infuse liquid biobased fertilizers with atmospheric Nitrogen (N), doubling plant-available N content. The final product is labeled as Nitrogen-Enriched Organic Fertilizer (NEO). This study investigates and compares the applicability of NEO against conventional fertilizers in grass production during 2020-2023 across two regions in Norway. Regarding different fertilizers' N efficacy, in the trials featuring only grasses, applying 210 kg N ha-1 in NEO yielded dry matter (DM) and N yield comparable to those achieved with 149 and 154 kg N ha-1 in mineral fertilizer, respectively. Besides, the untreated cattle slurry and mineral fertilizer combination containing 210 kg N ha-1 resulted in a DM and N yield equivalent to 178 and 180 kg N ha-1 in mineral fertilizer. In the grass-clover mixture trials, NEO and mineral fertilizers reduced the clover content, significantly influencing the overall yield. Merging the results from all trials (2021-2022), it was found that given identical N-min content, standalone mineral fertilizer, and the untreated slurry and mineral fertilizer combination resulted in ~19% and ~28%, and ~14% and ~13.5% higher DM and N yields than NEO, respectively. Further, NEO provided ~9% and ~25% higher DM and N yields than untreated slurry. Notably, NEO's N-min content was nearly double that of untreated slurry (210 vs. 107 kg N ha-1). Nonetheless, a supplementary trial (2023) employing different NEO variants with reduced nitrite and elevated nitrate levels returned more promising results than those examined in prior years. Still, ~9% and ~6% less DM and N yield than mineral fertilizer with identical 210 kg N ha-1 content. Our findings suggest that although a considerable N fraction of NEO did not translate to yields compared to other fertilization treatments, and given that NEO is an evolving product, the NEO's enhanced performance in the final study year highlights the necessity for continued research and optimization to fully unlock and utilize the potential advantages of NEO in future agriculture. Formats available You can view the full content in the following formats: Indexing Terms Descriptors Organism Descriptor Geographical Locations Broader Terms Information & Authors Information Published In 2024 Applicable geographic locations Europe, Norway Copyright Open Access This preprint is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. History Issue publication date: 2024 Submitted: 1 July 2024 Published online: 1 July 2024 Language English Authors Metrics & Citations Metrics SCITE_ Citations Export citation Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication. EXPORT CITATIONSExport Citation View Options View options Login Options Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00