A shape-constrained regression and wild bootstrap framework for reproducible drug synergy testing

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

High-throughput drug combination screens require methods to identify synergistic pairs, yet widely used synergy scores lack statistical inference and can fail when parametric dose–response fits do not converge. We present SIR (Synergy via Isotonic Regression), a nonparametric framework that defines interaction as deviation from a monotone-additive null, fit by 2D isotonic regression. A degrees-of-freedom-corrected wild bootstrap yields calibrated p-values for each dose–response matrix. On DrugCombDB, SIR interaction surfaces achieve higher replicate concordance (median correlation 0.91 across 1,839 replicate pairs) than all baselines (0.53–0.74), while avoiding Loewe’s 20.9% and ZIP’s 3.6% failure rates. The fitted surface also predicts missing wells (median holdout RMSE 0.040). By replacing heuristic scores with calibrated effect sizes and p-values, SIR enables principled hit calling and error-rate control in large screens.
Full text 1,147 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract High-throughput drug combination screens require methods to identify synergistic pairs, yet widely used synergy scores lack statistical inference and can fail when parametric dose–response fits do not converge. We present SIR (Synergy via Isotonic Regression), a nonparametric framework that defines interaction as deviation from a monotone-additive null, fit by 2D isotonic regression. A degrees-of-freedom-corrected wild bootstrap yields calibrated p-values for each dose–response matrix. On DrugCombDB, SIR interaction surfaces achieve higher replicate concordance (median correlation 0.91 across 1,839 replicate pairs) than all baselines (0.53–0.74), while avoiding Loewe’s 20.9% and ZIP’s 3.6% failure rates. The fitted surface also predicts missing wells (median holdout RMSE 0.040). By replacing heuristic scores with calibrated effect sizes and p-values, SIR enables principled hit calling and error-rate control in large screens. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Substantial revision of the writing of the manuscript. Method renamed to SIR (Synergy via Isotonic Regression).

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00