Does size matter? Expectations and limitations in imaging diagnosis of deep endometriosis?
article
OA: closed
CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed
this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is
available through Endo Lab. The
publisher's page (linked below)
is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional
access, use "Find at my library".
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (4)
- Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis 2019
- Prevalence and incidence of endometriosis in Australian women: a data linkage cohort study 2020
- Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: An International Consensus Statement 2024
- Ultrasound as a noninvasive diagnostic tool to detect deep endometriosis using the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis terminology 2025
References (4)
- Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: An International Consensus Statement via openalex
- Prevalence and incidence of endometriosis in Australian women: a data linkage cohort study via openalex
- Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis via openalex
- Ultrasound as a noninvasive diagnostic tool to detect deep endometriosis using the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis terminology via openalex
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-24T06:10:11.469335+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-24T06:03:59.080206+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK