Bat eye movements resolve a long-standing question in gaze control

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,780 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Summary Eye movements enable visual information gathering and stabilize gaze via optokinetic (OKR) and vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) pathways.1 Echolocating bats, despite their rapid and agile flight maneuvers to land upside down and navigate 3D space, have long been thought not to move their eyes, an assumption originating from Walls’s influential assertion over 80 years ago2 but never tested with empirical measurements. Here we present quantitative analysis of eye movements driven by visual and vestibular signals in Seba’s short-tailed bat (Carollia perspicillata). Bats generated robust visually driven OKR with an oculomotor range of ∼±10°, and displayed strong otolith-mediated responses during off-vertical axis rotation. In contrast, they showed minimal semicircular canal–driven angular VOR (aVOR) for passive head rotations that elicit large, sustained responses in mice. Micro-CT reconstructions revealed that bats and mice have similar semicircular canal geometry, indicating that the weak aVOR does not reflect peripheral anatomical constraints. These findings provide the first empirical demonstration that bats make robust eye movements and exhibit strong visual and otolith-driven components of gaze stabilization. We propose that semicircular canal signals may be more strongly engaged during active flight and modulated by behavioral state–dependent tuning of vestibular pathways to support ecologically specialized behaviors. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Author contact: Hui Ho Vanessa Chang (changhhv{at}inha.ac.kr) Grace Capshaw (gcapshaw{at}jhu.edu), Dimitri Skandalis (dskanda1{at}jhu.edu) Cynthia F. Moss (cynthia.moss{at}jhu.edu) Lead contact Kathleen E. Cullen (kathleen.cullen{at}jhu.edu).

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00