A Global Review of Wetland Biodiversity and Carbon Connections

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,018 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. As human actions have degraded global ecosystems over time, communities have often combated ecosystem function loss through restoration with a singular focus, falling on one side of the habitat and biodiversity protection or carbon sequestration dichotomy. Wetlands are no exception to this trend, and the large global push to protect and restore wetlands has widely ignored multiple-benefit practices. This scoping review aimed to determine whether this historic restoration dichotomy was also represented in studies of wetlands and to what extent the potential biodiversity and carbon synergy differs between taxonomic groups. Of the 106 studies included in this review, a majority did not investigate this synergy despite many studies reporting metrics of both biodiversity and carbon cycling. In studies that included synergy comparisons, floral diversity increased carbon sequestration overall while microbial diversity could increase or decrease carbon sequestration depending on which functional groups were present. We discuss limitations in metric selection, wetland types, restoration stage, and time scales that prevent current work from improving the ability for restored wetlands to support multiple benefits and take advantage of the synergy seen in other wetlands. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2DD3M Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Sciences, Natural Resources and Conservation, Natural Resources Management and Policy wetland, biodiversity, carbon sequestration, multi-benefit restoration, management Published: 2026-03-11 17:07 Last Updated: 2026-03-11 17:07 Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00