Spatially-resolved single cell atlas of liposarcoma reveals lineage hierarchies, immune niches, and regulatory circuits

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS and DDLPS) exhibit markedly different clinical behaviors, with DDLPS showing greater aggressiveness, higher recurrence and metastasis rates, and worse outcomes. Using single-nucleus multiome sequencing, epigenomic profiling, and spatial transcriptomics, we characterized cellular and epigenetic heterogeneity between these subtypes at single-cell and spatial resolution. We found distinct phenotypic states reflecting altered lineage differentiation and plasticity: DDLPS is dominated by early-differentiated progenitor-like cells, sclerotic WDLPS displays broader mesenchymal lineage plasticity, and adipocytic WDLPS contains abundant committed adipocytes. The DDLPS immune microenvironment was dominated by immunosuppressive macrophages, whereas WDLPS harbored more T cells and inflammatory macrophages. Notably, sclerotic WDLPS displayed intermediate cellular and molecular features, suggesting it may represent a distinct WDLPS subtype. Importantly, we identified novel gene regulatory circuits underlying each state, including FABP4/PPARG programs in adipocytic WDLPS, GLI2/TCF7L2/RBPJ/KLF7 programs in sclerotic WDLPS, and KLF7/FOSL2/SP3/GLI2/RBPJ programs in DDLPS. H3K27ac-marked enhancers were enriched near adipocytic marker genes in WDLPS and mesenchymal markers in DDLPS. Together, these findings reveal the cellular heterogeneity of tumor and immune compartments across liposarcoma subtypes and identify regulatory programs driving their differentiation states. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
Full text 2,920 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS and DDLPS) exhibit markedly different clinical behaviors, with DDLPS showing greater aggressiveness, higher recurrence and metastasis rates, and worse outcomes. Using single-nucleus multiome sequencing, epigenomic profiling, and spatial transcriptomics, we characterized cellular and epigenetic heterogeneity between these subtypes at single-cell and spatial resolution. We found distinct phenotypic states reflecting altered lineage differentiation and plasticity: DDLPS is dominated by early-differentiated progenitor-like cells, sclerotic WDLPS displays broader mesenchymal lineage plasticity, and adipocytic WDLPS contains abundant committed adipocytes. The DDLPS immune microenvironment was dominated by immunosuppressive macrophages, whereas WDLPS harbored more T cells and inflammatory macrophages. Notably, sclerotic WDLPS displayed intermediate cellular and molecular features, suggesting it may represent a distinct WDLPS subtype. Importantly, we identified novel gene regulatory circuits underlying each state, including FABP4/PPARG programs in adipocytic WDLPS, GLI2/TCF7L2/RBPJ/KLF7 programs in sclerotic WDLPS, and KLF7/FOSL2/SP3/GLI2/RBPJ programs in DDLPS. H3K27ac-marked enhancers were enriched near adipocytic marker genes in WDLPS and mesenchymal markers in DDLPS. Together, these findings reveal the cellular heterogeneity of tumor and immune compartments across liposarcoma subtypes and identify regulatory programs driving their differentiation states. Competing Interest Statement EpiCypher is a commercial developer and supplier of the CUTANA platform used in this study and holds a patent (#WO2020132388A1) for related technologies. J.L.M., A.S., L.M.A.-S., D.N.M., C.C.S., B.J.V., C.L.W., and M.C.K., are or were employed by (and own shares in) EpiCypher, with M.-C.K. also a board member of same. EFNH reports consulting fees from Sonata therapeutics. AJL reports consulting and/or advisory board relationships with the following entities: AbbVie, Adaptimmune, AJCC, Astra-Zeneca, Bain Capital, Bayer, Bio-AI Health, BMS, CAP, Caris, Deciphera, Elsevier, Foghorn Therapeutics, Gothams, GSK, Illumina, Invitae / Archer DX, Iterion Therapeutics, Merck, Novartis, Nucleai, OncoKB (MSKCC), Paige, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche / Genentech, SpringerNature, SpringWorks, Tempus, ThermoFisher, USCAP. NS reports current clinical trial research funding/grant support through the institution from AstraZeneca, Ascentage, Deciphera, Cogent, Boehringer Ingelheim, IDRX, Ningo Newbay, and Bayer. Advisory Board consultant (last 2 yrs) for Aadi Biosciences, Adatimmune, Bayer, Deciphera, Ipsen, and Boehringer Ingelheim. KR reports research funding support through the institution from Cyclacel Inc, consulting and/or advisory agreements from Daiichi Sankyo and Jivanu Therapeutics, and equity in Jivanu Therapeutics and Koshika Therapeutics.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00