Molecular characterization of capulet2 reveals the importance of ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX 6 maternal expression in endosperm development

Molecular characterization of capulet2 reveals the importance of ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX 6 maternal expression in endosperm development | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Molecular characterization of capulet2 reveals the importance of ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX 6 maternal expression in endosperm development View ORCID Profile Yuri S. van Ekelenburg , View ORCID Profile Ida V. Myking , Cathal Meehan , Morten P. Hauger , View ORCID Profile Shinichiro Komaki , Keiko Sugimoto , View ORCID Profile José Gutierrez-Marcos , View ORCID Profile Paul E. Grini doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.09.675171 Yuri S. van Ekelenburg a Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo , 0316 Oslo, Norway Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Yuri S. van Ekelenburg Ida V. Myking a Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo , 0316 Oslo, Norway Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Ida V. Myking Cathal Meehan b School of Life Science, University of Warwick , Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Morten P. Hauger a Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo , 0316 Oslo, Norway Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Shinichiro Komaki c Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Division of Biological Science , 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Shinichiro Komaki Keiko Sugimoto d RIKEN, Center for Sustainable Resource Science , Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site José Gutierrez-Marcos b School of Life Science, University of Warwick , Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for José Gutierrez-Marcos Paul E. Grini a Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo , 0316 Oslo, Norway Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Paul E. Grini For correspondence: paul.grini{at}ibv.uio.no Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Flowering plants are characterized by a double fertilization event, and the fertilized female gametes develop into the endosperm and embryo. Genomic imprinting promotes parental allele-specific gene expression in the endosperm by epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation. Similarly, gametophyte maternal effects influence gene function in the female gametophyte that affects development of the endosperm and embryo post-fertilization. While most imprinted genes do not display a seed phenotype upon mutation, gametophyte maternal effect mutants are characterized by distorted seed development upon maternal transmission of the mutant allele. Here, we have investigated the gametophyte maternal effect mutant capulet2 ( cap2 ). We have established CAP2 to be encoded by ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX 6 ( APC6 ), a subunit of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). Investigation of further cap2/apc6 alleles revealed female gametophyte maternal effects both in mutant segregation and seed phenotype, and both cap2 and apc6 phenotypes were rescued by an APC6 transgene. Furthermore, we demonstrate that APC6 is a maternally expressed imprinted gene, in line with the observed female gametophyte maternal effect phenotype. To this end, we observed irregular nuclear division of the endosperm coenocyte in cap2/apc6 mutants, suggesting a role for the APC/C in early endosperm development. We further demonstrate that similar endosperm defects are also produced by mutation of APC1 , another subunit of the APC/C. Similar to cap2/apc6, APC1 is imprinted and only expressed from the maternal allele, suggesting a maternal bias in the control of APC/C in the developing endosperm. Introduction Seed development in angiosperms is initiated by a double fertilization event forming the diploid embryo and triploid endosperm ( Nowack et al., 2010 ). The embryo develops into the next generation and receives nutrients from the mother plant through the endosperm. Due to the triploid nature of the endosperm, a balanced parental gene expression is important ( Barton et al., 1984 ; Birchler, 1993 ). While most genes are expressed equally from both parental alleles (biparentally expressed genes; BEGs), some genes have been found to be regulated in a parent-of-origin dependent manner ( Köhler and Grossniklaus, 2005 ; Nowack et al., 2010 ). Parent-of-origin specific gene expression, also called genomic imprinting, has been described in mammals, filamentous fungi and flowering plants ( Martienssen and Colot, 2001 ; Feil and Berger, 2007 ). In genomic imprinting, an epigenetic mark is established in the gametes, resulting in silencing of the allele post-fertilization ( Montgomery and Berger, 2021 ). Currently, two major epigenetic regulatory mechanisms are known to be involved in the establishment of imprinting, DNA methylation and histone modification. Maternally expressed genes (MEGs) are mainly hypothesized to be regulated by DNA methylation and removal of methylated cytosines by DNA glycosylases. Several DNA methyltransferases have been identified in Arabidopsis thaliana ( A. thaliana ), including DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE 1 (MET1) ( Finnegan et al., 1993 ), CHROMOMETHYLASE 3 (CMT3) ( Lindroth et al., 2001 ) and DOMAINS REARRANGED METHYLASE 1 & 2 (DRM1/DRM2) ( Cao and Jacobsen, 2002 ). It has been shown that DNA methylation marks established by MET1 ( Xiao et al., 2003 ; Kinoshita et al., 2004 ; Gehring et al., 2006 ; Shirzadi et al., 2011 ), DRM1/DRM2 ( Matzke and Mosher, 2014 ; Hornslien et al., 2019 ) and CMT3, guided by histone H3 lysine nine di-methylation (H3K9me2) ( Stroud et al., 2014 ; Moreno-Romero et al., 2019 ), can regulate the imprinting state of specific genes. In addition, RNA directed de novo DNA methylation (RdDM) guided by small RNAs has been demonstrated ( Vu et al., 2013 ; Hornslien et al., 2019 ; Satyaki and Gehring, 2019 ; Batista and Köhler, 2020 ). Paternally expressed genes (PEGs) are mainly considered to be regulated by silencing of the maternal allele in the central cell by the FERTILIZATION INDEPENDENT SEED 2-Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (FIS-PRC2) complex ( Gehring, 2013 ). Upon recruitment of FIS-PRC2 to DNA hypomethylated loci on the maternal allele, the histone methyltransferase subunit MEDEA (MEA) trimethylates histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3), a mark for gene repression ( Rodrigues and Zilberman, 2015 ; Moreno-Romero et al., 2016 ). Several genes have shown to exhibit maternal silencing by the FIS-PRC2 complex, including PHERES1 ( PHE1 ), and display interaction between DNA and histone methylation ( Köhler et al., 2005 ; Makarevich et al., 2008 ; Hornslien et al., 2019 ; Batista and Köhler, 2020 ). Similar to imprinted genes, gametophyte parental effect genes affect post fertilization seed development ( Johnston et al., 1992 ; Colombo et al., 1997 ). Although the outcome of parental effect genes and imprinted genes is relatively similar, they are distinct genetic phenomena and have different molecular origins ( Wolf and Wade, 2009 ). The epigenetic marks for imprinted genes are established prior to fertilization and affect gene expression post-fertilization ( Montgomery and Berger, 2021 ), whereas parental effects are caused by pre-fertilization products (i.e. mRNA and proteins) that become active and execute their effect post-fertilization, irrespective of gene expression ( Johnston et al., 1992 ; Colombo et al., 1997 ). Gametophyte maternal effect mutants have been characterized by normal gametophyte development, followed by disrupted embryo and/or endosperm development when the mutant allele is transmitted through the female parent ( Yadegari and Drews, 2004 ). Gametophyte maternal effect mutants have been identified in both Arabidopsis and maize ( Evans and Kermicle, 2001 ; Grini et al., 2002 ; Olsen, 2004 ; Pagnussat et al., 2005 ; Gutiérrez-Marcos et al., 2006 ; Phillips and Evans, 2011 ; Chettoor et al., 2016 ), including the capulet ( cap ) mutants ( cap1 and cap2 ), which show developmental arrest in the early developing embryo and endosperm ( Grini et al., 2002 ). The cap2 allele is only lethal when transmitted maternally, indicative of a gametophytic maternal effect mutant. Gametophyte maternal effects could be explained by maternally deposited RNA or protein or by genomic imprinting. It remains technologically challenging, however, to identify the origin of transcripts in the endosperm directly after fertilization, i.e. whether transcripts come from the female central cell as maternal carry-over or if they have been transcribed de novo ( Evans and Kermicle, 2001 ). In this study, we have identified the molecular nature of the gametophytic maternal effect mutant cap2 . Using whole genome sequencing and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis, we identified the causative cap2 SNP to be located in an intron splice donor site of the ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX 6 ( APC6 ), encoding a subunit of the ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX/CYCLOSOME (APC/C). Two independent T-DNA insertion lines, apc6-2 and apc6-3 were thoroughly analyzed and phenocopied cap2 , both in terms of seed phenotypes and frequency. Moreover, cap2, apc6-2 and apc6-3 could be rescued by molecular complementation using an APC6 transgene. In line with the gametophyte maternal effect phenotype, APC6 was shown to be a maternally expressed imprinted gene. To this end, we could demonstrate that mutation of APC1 , another subunit of the APC/C, displays a female gametophyte phenotype and enhances the frequency of disrupted endosperm development in an apc6 genetic background. Similar to cap2 / apc6, APC1 is imprinted and only expressed from the maternal allele, suggesting a maternal bias to the anaphase promoting complex (APC/C). Materials and methods Plant material and growth conditions Wild-type (WT) accessions Columbia (Col-0), Landsberg erecta (L er -1), Tsushima (Tsu-1), C24 and T-DNA mutant lines were obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC; ( Scholl et al., 2000 )). Seedlings were grown on MS-2 (Murashige and Skoog medium with 2% sucrose) plates in a 16-h-light / 8-h-dark cycle at 22°C for 10 days prior to transferring to soil. Plants were further grown in a 16-h-light / 8-h-dark cycle at 18°C. T-DNA mutant plant lines apc6-2 (SAIL_442_F11), apc6-3 (SALK_008789), apc1-2 (SALK_059826; g), SALK_002024C ( SRF5 ), SALK_070429C ( SRF5 ), SAIL_1280_D04 ( SRF5 ), SALK_120562 (intergenic), SALK_033225 (intergenic), cmt3-11 (SALK_148381; (Chan et al., 2006)), met1-7 (SALK_076522; ( Kanno et al., 2008 )) and drm1-2;drm2-2 (N16383; (Chan et al., 2006)) were in the Col-0 accession background (except apc6-3 ; Col-3). The triple drm1-2 ; drm2-2 ; cmt3-11 mutant was crossed with the hemizygous met1-7 mutant to generate a hemizygous met1-7 ; drm1-2 ; drm2-2 ; cmt3-11 quadruple mutant. Methyltransferase mutants were maintained hemizygous ( Mathieu et al., 2007 ). Endosperm marker lines used in crosses with apc6-2, proAT5G09370>>H2A-GFP ( EE-GFP ) and proAT4G00220>>H2A-GFP ( TE1-GFP ), were in Col-0 accession background ( van Ekelenburg et al., 2023 ). For all crosses, closed flower buds were emasculated 2 days prior to crossing to avoid self-pollination. Microscopy Crossed siliques were manually dissected and seeds were mounted on a microscopy slide in a clearing solution of glycerol and chloral hydrate as previously described ( Grini et al., 2002 ). Microscopic analyses were performed using an Axioplan2 Imaging microscope equipped with a Zeiss Axio cam HDR camera. For fluorescent phenotypic analyses, seeds were mounted on a microscopy slide in two drops of tap water or 0.1 % Tween in 1x phosphate buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) or 30% glycerol with 20 µg/ml Propidium Iodide (PI). Seeds were analyzed for GFP fluorescence using an Andor DragonFly Spinning Disk confocal microscope with a 488 nm wavelength diode laser (Oxford) and imaged with a Zyla4.2 sCMOS camera (Oxford). DNA isolation and whole genome sequencing Leaf and flower tissue from twelve individual cap2/CAP2 ( cap2 mut) and twelve CAP2/CAP2 ( cap2 wt) plants was collected in duplicate in a 2-ml round bottom tube containing a 5 mm metal bead and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The frozen tissue was ground using a Retsch homogenizer for 1 min at 30 s -1 . Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated as described in the ChargeSwitch gDNA Plant Kit (Invitrogen) manual and gDNA was eluted in 40 µl 10 mM Tris buffer (pH 8,5 at room temperature). Isolated gDNA was quality checked by Nanodrop and DNA concentrations were determined by Qubit dsDNA BR Assay Kit (Life Technologies). DNA libraries were prepared using the KAPA Hyper Kit (Roche) with 24 Unique Dual Indexes (Illumina) and sequenced 150 bp paired-end over two lanes on the Illumina HiSeq 4000 system. Identification of the cap2 causative single nucleotide polymorphism Sequencing reads were pre-processed using fastp with default settings and the overrepresentation analysis parameter to remove reads with low quality score, irregular GC content, short length, and sequencing adapters present ( Chen et al., 2018 ). Trimmed reads were then quality checked with outputs from fastp to ensure trimming had been successful. Trimmed reads were mapped to the TAIR10 reference genome using bowtie2 ( Langmead and Salzberg, 2012 ). Variant calling was performed on aligned and sorted BAM files using samtools mpileup and piped to bcftools to produce VCF files ( Li et al., 2009 ). VCF files were converted to SHOREmap format and analyzed using SHOREmap backcross and then annotated to output tables and plots of backcross SNPs ( Sun and Schneeberger, 2015 ). RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis RNA was isolated from plant tissue (seeds or flowers) as described in the Spectrum Total Plant RNA Kit and On-Column DNaseI Digestion Set (Sigma Aldrich) manual. The tubes were shaken in a MagNA Lyser Instrument (Roche) at 7000 rounds per minute (rpm) for 15 sec, centrifuged at 13000 rpm in 4 °C for 15 sec and then placed at -20 °C for 2 min. This procedure was repeated three times before proceeding with the protocol. cDNA was synthesized from 2.5 µl RNA as described in the SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) manual and cDNA was purified using Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega). Single nucleotide polymorphism analysis Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between accessions were identified using GabiPD GreenCards (The GABI Primary Database) or Polymorph 1001 (1001 Genomes) and SNPs were verified by sequencing. Parental-specific expression based on these SNPs was determined by restriction digestion. For APC1 , a SNP at position 6551 (G in L er -1; A in Col-0, Tsu-1 and C24) gains a restriction site for AlwI in the L er -1 accession. For APC6 , a SNP at position 1297 (C in L er -1; G in Col-0, Tsu and C24) results in the loss of the restriction recognition site for SacII for the L er -1 accession. No restriction recognition site was identified covering the SNP at position 1516 (T in Col-0; A in C24), and therefore a recognition site for BgIII was introduced in the C24 accession using the Derived Cleaved Amplified Polymorphic Sequences (dCAPS) Finder 2.0 tool ( Neff et al., 2002 ). The WT accessions Col-0, L er -1, Tsu-1 and C24 were crossed reciprocally, and L er -1 was crossed maternally to met1-7/+, ddc/+ and ddcm/+ . Siliques were dissected at 4 DAP using a stereomicroscope and seeds were harvested in MagNA Lyser Green Beads tubes (Roche) tubes were collected into liquid nitrogen. Seeds from three mother plants, four siliques each, were pooled for each biological replicate. RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis were performed as described above. The SNP-containing DNA region was amplified by PCR with TaKaRa Ex Taq DNA Polymerase on 50 ng cDNA template using specific primers (STable 3) and PCR products were verified by sequencing. Restriction digestion was performed on 400 ng PCR product with 10 U of enzyme in a final volume of 25 µl. Equal amounts of digested fragments were analyzed using DNA-1000-LabOnChip and 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Molecular cloning and genotyping Genotyping was performed using the KAPA3G Plant PCR kit (Roche) and gene- and T-DNA specific primers (STable 3). PCR products were sequenced by Eurofins Genomic and analyzed using Geneious software. To construct the proAPC6:APC6-GFP plasmid, a genomic fragment of the APC6 gene, including 2 kb of the 5’-upstream sequence, was amplified by PCR and cloned between the AscI and SmaI sites of the pGFP_NOSG vector ( Iwase et al., 2017 ). The resulting construct was then recombined into pGWB601 vector ( Nakamura et al., 2010 ) using LR Clonase II. Genetic constructs were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 strain and introduced into capulet2, apc6-3 and WT accession L er -1 using the floral dip method ( Clough and Bent, 1998 ). RNA sequencing analysis Raw reads from RNA Seq data were obtained from online resources ( Bjerkan et al., 2020 ). Trimmed reads were obtained using Cutadapt version 1.18 ( Martin, 2011 ), version TrimGalore 0.6.2 ( Krueger, 2012 ) and mapped to the Araport11 CDS reference transcriptome ( Cheng et al., 2017 ) using Bowtie version 2.3.5.1 ( Langmead and Salzberg, 2012 ) with parameters -- no-unal --no-mixed --no-discordant --sensitive --end-to-end -k 1 . Libraries were normalized using DESeq2 version 1.30.1 (Love et al., 2014). Statistical analysis was performed using ‘plyr’ version 1.8.6 ( Wickham, 2011 ) and visualized using RStudio with ‘ggplot2’ version 3.3.5 ( Wickham, 2016 ). For the analysis of parental ratios, mapped reads were extracted using SAMtools version 1.9 ( Li et al., 2009 ) and SNP counting was performed in Geneious Prime version 2021.1.1 ( http://www.geneious.com/ ) using 0.2 as variant (L er -1) frequency threshold (except AGL23 - variant frequency threshold). Reads from all timepoints were merged and aligned to the Col-0 reference sequence. SNP counting was performed to present an overview of reliable SNPs between L er -1 and Col-0 for each gene. The allele frequencies of each SNP for each timepoint (>10 coverage per SNP) were weighted for the coverage and visualized in Rstudio with ‘ggplot2’ version 3.3.5 ( Wickham, 2016 ) and ‘ggpattern’ version 0.2.0 (Mike FC and Trevor L Davis, 2022). Image Analysis and Figure Preparation Images were processed using Fiji ( Schindelin et al., 2012 ). Figures were assembled in Adobe Illustrator 2022 (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, USA). Accession Numbers All sequences generated in this study have been deposited to the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra ) with project number PRJNA808889. Supplemental data All supplemental data files have been deposited to GitHub ( https://github.com/PaulGrini/capulet2 ). Results capulet2 causative mutation is located in APC6 The capulet2 mutant was identified in an ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)-induced gametophytic mutant screen by a segregation distortion assay using the multi marker chromosome 1 (mm1) line ( Grini et al., 1999 ). The location of cap2 was determined between the flanking genetic markers ap1 and gl2 ( Figure 1a ) at a genome interval between ADH1 and gl2 using molecular markers ( Grini et al., 2002 ). To determine the causative mutation of the cap2 we employed whole genome sequencing. For this purpose, gDNA was isolated from twelve cap2/CAP2 ( cap2/+ ) and twelve CAP2/CAP2 (+/+) plants. We performed a nucleotide polymorphism analysis between pairs of cap2/ + and CAP2/CAP2 individuals, which revealed a clear linkage break on chromosome 1 (SFigure 1). We found between 100 and 180 candidate SNPs in the ADH1 and gl2 interval ( Figure 1b , SData 1). Candidate SNPs were further selected by their base alignment quality score (BAQ ≥70) ( Li, 2011 ), the presence of guanine to adenine conversion as the mutation arose in a population treated with EMS, an allele frequency between 0.25 and 0.75 (STable 1a) and conserved across all twelve comparisons (STable 1b). We found three SNPs that meet these requirements – one in the ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX 6 ( APC6 ), one in the STRUBBELIG RECEPTOR FAMILY 5 ( SRF5 ) and one in an intergenic region. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1: Identification of the causative cap2 mutation. a) Identification of candidate causative SNPs located on chromosome 1 between the visible mutant markers ap1 and gl2 of multiply marked chromosome 1 (mm1). Segregation analysis using molecular markers narrowed down the location of the cap2 mutation between ADH1 and gl2 . b) SNP analysis of twelve independent comparisons between a cap2 / CAP2 and a CAP2 / CAP2 individual. Representation of identified SNPs, the type of mutation and allele frequency in a region of 1.06 Mbp of comparison 3. c) Molecular analysis of cap2 and apc mutant alleles: The cap2 G → A conversion (red) abolishes splicing and intron translation leads to a stop codon directly after the cap2 SNP. The apc6-2 T-DNA insertion, located in exon 12, has a 10 bp deletion and an in-frame stop codon 68 bp into the T-DNA. The apc6-3 T-DNA insertion located in intron 2 has a 12 bp deletion. cDNA analysis revealed a cryptic splice acceptor site present in the T-DNA 70 bp inwards, resulting in splicing of intron 2 (up till the T-DNA insertion site) and part of the T-DNA, followed directly by an in-frame stop codon. Both apc6-2 and apc6-3 have at least two truncated T-DNA insertions at the same locus consecutively in opposite orientations. Exons and introns are highlighted by color and letter size (blue uppercase and green lowercase, respectively). Dotted line indicates splice event. Underlined nucleotides represent a stop codon. LB = T-DNA left border. APC6 mutants are defective in endosperm development We obtained three homozygous T-DNA insertion lines for SRF5 and two T-DNA insertion lines flanking the intergenic candidate SNP and found that homozygous mutant plants for these insertions had normal seed sets and were indistinguishable from wild-types plants ( data not shown ). Our genome sequencing analysis revealed that the cap2 mutant carries a splice site mutation in intron eight of APC6 , potentially resulting in an unspliced transcript, introducing an in-frame early stop codon ( Figure 1c ). We obtained two T-DNA insertion lines for APC6 , one that we named apc6-2 (SAIL_442_F11) carrying an insertion located in exon twelve that results in the formation of a premature stop codon, and a second named apc6-3 (SALK_008789) that carries an insertion located in the second intron, resulting in a cryptic splice acceptor site inside the T-DNA sequence leading to an in-frame stop codon ( Figure 1c ). We found that when heterozygous apc6-2 and apc6-3 were crossed with wild-type (WT) pollen, the resulting seeds displayed developmental defects that were apparent at four days after pollination (DAP) and that resembled the seed phenotype observed in cap2/+ ( Figure 2a ). To further characterize the endosperm phenotypes, we crossed apc6-2/+ with an Early Endosperm ( EE-GFP ) reporter line expressing GFP before endosperm cellularization and a Total Endosperm ( TE1-GFP ) reporter line expressing GFP after endosperm cellularization ( Bjerkan et al., 2023 ; van Ekelenburg et al., 2023 ). We found that a large proportion of seeds in apc6-2/+ ; EE-GFP plants had a reduced number and enlarged endosperm nuclei marked by a strong EE-GFP signal at 4 DAP ( Figure 2a ; SFigure 2). In apc6-2/+ ; TE1-GFP plants, however, the post-cellularization marker TE1-GFP was rarely detected in phenotypically mutant endosperm 4 DAP, suggesting that the mutant endosperm remain uncellularized (SFigure 2). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2: Seed phenotypes in cap2, apc6-2 and apc6-3 display gametophytic maternal effects. a) Endosperm phenotypes of cap2/+, apc6-2/+ and apc6-3/+ crossed maternally to Col-0 display arrested endosperm development at four days after pollination (DAP). A lower number of enlarged endosperm nuclei are observed compared to wild-type Col-0. Closed arrowheads indicate enlarged and abnormally shaped endosperm nuclei, arrows indicate smaller endosperm nuclei. A turquoise hue is added to highlight the endosperm, yellow hue highlights the embryo. Selfed EE-GFP compared to apc6-2/+;EE-GFP highlights enlarged and abnormally shaped endosperm nuclei. GFP-expressing seeds were counterstained with Propidium Iodide (red). Scale bar = 20 µm. b) Mutant seed phenotype frequencies for cap2/+, apc6-2/+ and apc6-3/+ at 4 DAP when selfed or crossed reciprocally to Col-0. n > 10 siliques per cross. Statistics was performed according to the Wilcoxon rank sum test; *** p-value < 0.001, **** p-value < 0.0001. Notably, the Arabidopsis nomega mutant, caused by transposon insertion in APC6 ( Kwee and Sundaresan, 2003 ) and an APC6 mutant in rice ( Awasthi et al., 2012 ) have both been reported to be gametophytic mutants displaying pre-fertilization developmental defects. To investigate this discrepancy, we analyzed unfertilized ovules of wild-type, cap2/+, apc6-2/+ and apc6-3/+ . We found that the embryo sac central cell and egg cell, and egg apparatus of mutant lines are indistinguishable from WT (STable 2), and the three independent mutant alleles that we have identified for APC6 show only post-fertilization seed defects. We previously reported that cap2 is a female gametophyte mutant, because seed defects are only observed when the mutant allele is transmitted maternally ( Grini et al.,2002 ). We carried out reciprocal crosses between cap2/+, apc6-2/+ and apc6-3/+ and WT plants and quantified defects in seed development ( Figure 2b , SData 2). We found that seeds failed to develop only when mutant lines were used as female parents (24.2%, 27.3% and 27.5% for cap2/+, apc6-2/+ and apc6-3/+ respectively), while seeds developed normally when wild-type plants were crossed with pollen from mutant lines. As initially reported for cap2 ( Grini et al., 2002 ), we did not find homozygous individuals in progenies of self-pollinated apc6-2/+ and apc6-3/+ plants (N = 47 and 42, respectively). Collectively, these findings indicate that mutations on APC6 result in a maternal gametophyte effect on seed development. Genetic complementation of mutants with APC6 To verify that cap2 is caused by mutation of APC6 , we transformed cap2/+ and apc6-3/+ plants with a proAPC6:APC6-GFP ( APC6-GFP ) transgene. The transgene was also transformed into WT L er -1 plants to confirm endosperm expression (SFigure 3). Plants from unique transformation events were genotyped for mutant alleles and APC6-GFP , and mutant seed phenotype frequencies were determined (SData 3). The frequency of mutant phenotypes was significantly reduced for the alleles tested, both in a hemizygous ( APC6-GFP/+ ) or homozygous ( APC6-GFP/APC6-GFP ) transgene background ( Figure 3 ; SFigure 4). Notably, homozygous cap2 genotypes were identified in the T2 generation ( Figure 3 ; SFigure 5a, b). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3: Complementation of cap2 with an APC6 transgene restores seed phenotype. Individuals heterozygous for the cap2 SNP ( cap2/+ ) were identified in both a hemizygous and homozygous transgenic background and homozygous individuals ( cap2 / cap2 ) were identified in a homozygous transgenic background. A significant reduction of the gametophyte maternal effect seed phenotype frequency is observed for cap2/+ in a hemizygous transgenic background. In a homozygous transgenic background, a significant reduction is observed for cap2/+ and cap2 / cap2 . Data from independent transgenic lines are merged for each box-plot: four independent rescue lines displayed significantly reduced phenotype frequency in a heterozygous APC6-GFP transgenic background, of which three segregated individuals with a homozygous construct background. Of these three lines, homozygous cap2 / cap2 mutants were identified in two. Statistics was performed according to the Wilcoxon rank sum test; **** p-value < 0.0001. Several homozygous apc6-3 individuals were detected in the T3 generation (SFigure 5c) and no mutant seed phenotypes were observed (SFigure 4). Homozygous apc6-3 mutants in a homozygous rescue construct background crossed to apc6-2 /+ plants, demonstrated several homozygous apc6-2 individuals in the F2, as well as trans-homozygous apc6-2 / apc6-3 (SFigure 5d). Collectively, these data show that all cap2/apc6 mutants can be rescued by a APC6-GFP transgene. Maternal penetrance and transmission of mutant alleles We found that when plants carrying the three different APC6 mutant alleles were pollinated with WT pollen, less than 50% of the seeds showed developmental abnormalities ( Figure 2b ), suggesting that these mutations were not fully penetrant. Therefore, we investigated in more detail the parental transmission of the different mutant alleles. To this aim, we selfed and crossed cap2/+, apc6-2/+ and apc6-3/+ reciprocally with WT plants and determined the transmission of the mutant alleles by molecular genotyping ( cap2 and apc6-3 ) or T-DNA herbicide resistance ( apc6-2 ) of seedlings ( Figure 4 , SData 4). Paternal transmission of cap2 (44.4%), apc6-2 (47.4%) and apc6-3 (46.7%) was not significantly different from the expected Mendelian transmission. Notably, the maternal transmission observed for cap2 (30.5%), apc6-2 (25.1%) and apc6-3 (20.2%) was significantly lower than the expected 1:1 ratio when crossed to WT and also significantly lower than the expected 3:1 ratio in self crosses. These data support that maternal, but not paternal cap2/apc6 alleles have significantly reduced transmission frequencies, suggesting a maternal bias in the role of APC6 . Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4: Genetic analysis shows reduced maternal transmission of cap2, apc6-2 and apc6-3 . Mutant alleles were selfed and crossed reciprocally to Col-0 and transmission was determined by genotyping ( cap2 and apc6-3 ) or using T-DNA herbicide resistance ( apc6-2 ). Maternal transmission was significantly reduced while paternal transmission was not significantly different from the expected (50%, dashed line). Selfed transmission frequency for all mutant alleles was significantly lower than expected (75%, dashed line). Statistics was performed according to the Chi square test; ** p-value < 0.01, *** p-value < 0.001, **** p-value < 0.0001. Expression of APC6 increases upon endosperm cellularization We investigated APC6 expression throughout seed development using publicly available RNA sequencing datasets ( Bjerkan et al., 2020 ). As controls, we used several MADS-box transcription factors known to be expressed only in the endosperm, either bi-parentally or showing parental allelic bias ( Colombo et al., 2008 ; Kang et al., 2008 ; Shirzadi et al., 2011 ). We found that APC6 was highly expressed between 1 and 2 DAP, decreasing between three and 4 DAP and increasing again at 6 DAP (SFigure 6). Since APC6 shows a dynamic pattern of expression during seed development, we carried out a phenotypic characterization at different stages of seed development (2, 4, 6 and 9 DAP) using cap2/+, apc6-2/+ and apc6-3/+ plants crossed with wild-type Col-0 pollen. Generally, we found that both embryo and endosperm development was delayed compared to wild-type plants (SFigure 7) and in this phenotypic class endosperm proliferation was arrested after a few rounds of nuclear division. We also observed another phenotypic class where the endosperm was not fully cellularized at late stages in seed development (6 to 9 DAP), while embryo development was normal, although delayed when compared to wild-type plants (SFigure 7). The occurrence of seed phenotypes and collapsed seeds at 4 DAP and 6 DAP was highly similar in all APC6 mutants (SFigure 7b, SData 5). APC6 is a maternally expressed imprinted gene Because all the APC6 mutants identified showed maternal gametophyte effects on endosperm development, we hypothesized that this could be caused by uniparental expression of APC6 transcripts. To test this hypothesis, we performed reciprocal crosses between different Arabidopsis accessions (L er -1, Col-0, C24 and Tsu-1) and analyzed the parental allele-specific expression of APC6 in developing seeds by taking advantage of SNPs between these accessions ( Figure 5a , SData 6). We found that at 4 DAP, the expression of APC6 was exclusively from the maternal allele in most of the accessions tested. We quantified the maternal:paternal allelic ratios for the different reciprocal crosses and found that the maternal allele was consistently expressed between 8 and 16-fold higher than the paternal allele ( Figure 5b , SData 6). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 5: APC6 is a maternally expressed imprinted gene. a) Imprinting analysis of APC6 using accession-specific restriction digestion of SNPs in reciprocal crosses of Col-0, C24, L er -1 and Tsu-1. cDNA was generated from four days after pollination (DAP) crossed seeds. One replicate of homozygous wild-type controls is included as accession-specific cDNA reference and three biological replicates for each reciprocal cross are shown. One of two bioanalyzer replicates is presented and the accession of the maternal contributor is named first. In all directions, except for C24 as female parent, APC6 is maternally expressed. Molarity ratios of maternal and paternal digested fragments from bioanalyzer profiles (a). Parental ratios are determined from all biological replicates and both bioanalyzer technical replicates. sd, standard deviation. To verify these results, we analyzed RNA-seq data of early developing seeds (1 to 6 DAP) from reciprocal crosses between L er -1 and Col-0 ( Shirzadi et al., 2011 ; Bjerkan et al., 2020 ). We identified several parental allele-specific SNPs, which we used to determine parental allele expression frequencies ( Figure 6 , SData 7). As controls we used MADS-box transcription factors, known to be expressed exclusively in the endosperm and biparentally ( AGL62 ), maternally biased ( AGL36 ) or paternally biased ( AGL23 ) ( Colombo et al., 2008 ; Kang et al., 2008 ; Shirzadi et al., 2011 ). We found that during early stages of seed development (1 to 4 DAP), APC6 displays a strong maternal expression bias, similar to AGL36 . The maternal bias of APC6 was highly concordant with the molarity ratios determined experimentally (11.1-fold and 8.4-fold, respectively; SData7). However, whereas AGL36 expression remains maternally biased at 6 DAP, the paternal expression of APC6 increased, which could be attributed to an increasing contribution of the developing embryo. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 6: Seed stage analysis of parent specific allelic expression of APC6 and imprinting control genes. Frequency of reads mapped to parental alleles of APC6, AGL36 (MEG control), AGL23 (PEG control) and AGL62 (BEG control) at different timepoints (one, two, three, four and six days after pollination (DAP)). Maternal:paternal read frequency ratios are plotted at respective timepoints. SNP analysis was performed with Geneious Prime version 2021.1.1 using 0.2 as variant (L er -1) frequency threshold (except AGL23 - 0.05 variant frequency threshold) and SNPs were weighted according to their coverage. We hypothesized that the silencing of the paternal APC6 allele may be caused by DNA methylation – a common characteristic of Arabidopsis MEGs ( Gehring and Satyaki, 2017 ; Hornslien et al., 2019 ; Batista and Köhler, 2020 ). To test this hypothesis, we pollinated WT L er -1 plants with pollen from met1-7/+ and drm1-2 ; drm2-2 ; cmt3-11 ( ddc/+ ) plants (SFigure 8a and b respectively). Due to possible DNA methyltransferase redundancy ( Zhang and Jacobsen, 2006 ), we also generated a quadruple met1-7 ; drm1-2 ; drm2-2 ; cmt3-11 ( ddcm/+ ) mutant and used as pollen donor (SFigure 8c). Depletion of DNA methylation in the pollen, using single, triple or quadruple mutants did not reactivate the silenced paternal expression of APC6 (SFigure 8a-c). Notably, the maternal:paternal expression ratios for all methyltransferase crosses were similar to the WT controls ( Figure 5b , SFigure 8d). Collectively, these data suggest that APC6 is a maternally expressed imprinted gene and that imprinting of APC6 is not mediated by canonical DNA methylation. Maternal expression of the APC/C The APC/C is a large, multi-subunit complex consisting of at least 14 subunits in Arabidopsis . These subunits can be divided into groups based on their structure and function, such as scaffolding, catalytic, substrate recognition and platform units ( Eloy et al., 2015 ). APC6 is a scaffolding unit consisting of tetratricopeptide repeats (TPRs), like APC3a and b, APC7 and APC8. In order to test whether members of other functional groups of the APC/C also display a maternal preference, we investigated APC1 , a platform subunit containing proteasome-cyclosome (PC) repeats. APC1 is the largest subunit of the APC/C, and has previously been described to be important for female gametogenesis and embryogenesis ( Wang et al., 2013 ). Heterozygous apc1-2/+ mutants displayed abnormalities in embryo sac formation, but no apparent reduction in seed set was found (SFigure 9a, SData 8). When apc1-2/+ was crossed maternally to Col-0, gametophyte maternal effect endosperm phenotypes highly reminiscent to cap2/apc6 were found, both in single apc1-2/+ mutants and in an apc1-2/+;apc6-2/+ double mutant ( Figure 7a ). Corresponding to mutants of apc6, apc1-2/+ mutants displayed endosperm defects only when crossed maternally to Col-0, with a phenotype frequency of 37.1 % ( Figure 7b ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 7: APC1 mutants display a cap2 / apc6 endosperm phenotype and is a maternally expressed imprinted gene. a) Seed phenotypes of apc1-2/+ and apc1-2/+;apc6-2/+ double mutant at four days after pollination (DAP) when crossed maternally to Col-0. A turquoise hue is added to highlight the endosperm, yellow hue highlights the embryo. Arrows indicate small nuclei, arrowheads indicate large nuclei. Scale bar = 20 µm. b) Seed phenotype frequencies of apc1-2/+ crossed reciprocally to Col-0 and apc6-2/+ and apc1-2/+;apc6-2+ crossed maternally to Col-0 at 4 DAP. No seed phenotype is present when apc1-2/+ is crossed paternally, significantly different from when it is crossed maternally. The phenotype frequency of maternally crossed apc1-2/+;apc6-2/+ double mutants is significantly increased compared to both single mutants. Statistics was performed according to Wilcoxon rank sum test; **** p-value < 0.0001. c) Imprinting analysis of APC1 using accession-specific restriction digestion of SNPs in reciprocal crosses between Col-0 and L er -1 at 4 DAP. One replicate of each homozygous wild-type control and three biological replicates for the reciprocal crosses are shown. One of two bioanalyzer replicates is presented and the accession of the maternal cross partner is named first. Mostly maternal APC1 expression was found in both directions of the reciprocal crosses shown. When crossing the apc1-2/+;apc6-2/+ double mutant maternally to Col-0 we observed a synergistic epistatic effect where the phenotype frequency of the double mutant (67.1 %) was significantly increased compared to both single mutants ( Figure 7b ). In addition, transmission of mutant alleles from a selfing apc1-2/+;apc6-2/+ double mutant was investigated. Using the phenotype frequencies of apc1-2/+ and the transmission frequency of apc6-2/+ , we calculated the expected transmission frequencies to be 60.9 % for the apc6-2 allele and 34.9 % for the apc1-2 and apc6-2 alleles together (SData 8). Notably, transmission of the apc6-2 allele deviated from this expectancy, with a significant decrease in offspring carrying the mutant allele (57.4 %; SFigure 9b). However, the transmission of both mutant alleles together was not significantly different from our expectation. Lastly, we investigated whether APC1 expression was maternally biased by genomic imprinting. To this end, we analyzed the parental allele-specific expression of APC1 in developing seeds using different Arabidopsis accessions (L er -1, Col-0, C24 and Tsu-1) as described previously. In 4 DAP seeds, APC1 was exclusively expressed from the maternal allele in all accessions and reciprocal crosses ( Figure 7c , SFigure 9c). Collectively, these data suggest that both APC1 and APC6 are maternally expressed imprinted genes that are required maternally both in the scaffolding and platform units of the APC/C for early endosperm development, suggesting a maternal bias in the role of the APC/C complex. Discussion In this study, we identified that mutation in APC6 is associated with the female gametophyte maternal effect mutant capulet2 ( cap2 ). Molecular characterization of cap2 has revealed that APC6 is a maternally expressed imprinted gene implicated in endosperm proliferation and cellularization. Our data reveals that the maternal contribution of the APC/C is critical for endosperm development in plants. capulet2 causative mutation is located in APC6 We have found that cap2 is caused by a splice donor mutation in APC6 . We were able to functionally complement cap2, apc6-2 and apc6-3 mutants with an APC6 transgene, allowing the generation of homozygous cap2, apc6-3 and apc6-2/apc6-3 mutant plants. Previous studies have revealed that mutations on several APC/C subunits result in female gametophyte defects (Saleme et al., 2021), including Arabidopsis nomega that carry a transposon insertion in APC6 ( Kwee and Sundaresan, 2003 ) and a mutant in rice OsAPC6 ( Awasthi et al., 2012 ). Notably, we have found that cap2, apc6-2 and apc6-3 mutations only display defects on early seed development. We found that the female gametophyte of cap2, apc6-2 and apc6-3 was indistinguishable from wild-type. APC6 is a maternally expressed imprinted gene Our analysis, using both allele-specific assays and RNA-seq allele-specific expression quantification has revealed that APC6 is an imprinted, maternally expressed gene. However, since we used whole seeds in the analysis, transcripts from the maternal seed coat or embryo could affect this interpretation ( Schon and Nodine, 2017 ). To address this caveat, we analyzed publicly available expression data from early developing seeds ( Belmonte et al., 2013 ), which showed that APC6 is primarily expressed in the endosperm. Due to the different genotypes of endosperm, embryo and seed coat (2:1; 1:1; 2:0, maternal:paternal respectively), a whole seed maternal:paternal ratio of ≈ 2:1 can be estimated if APC6 is equally expressed from both parental alleles. The maternal:paternal ratios in our analyses are at least >4-fold higher, ranging up to >50-fold higher, indicating that expression of APC6 is maternally biased in the endosperm. Our data also indicates that imprinting of APC6 is accession-specific, a phenomenon that also has been observed in previous studies of imprinted genes ( Wolff et al., 2011 ; Pignatta et al., 2014 ). It has been proposed that MEGs are regulated by DNA methylation through the activity of MET1 that silences gene expression in gametes and by DEMETER (DME) that removes methylation in the central cell and endosperm restoring the expression of maternal alleles ( Choi et al., 2002 ; Xiao et al., 2003 ; Gehring et al., 2006 ). Here, we have investigated the role of DNA methylation in imprinting of APC6 by crossing L er -1 with various DNA methyltransferase mutants in a Col-0 background and performed SNP digestion analysis to determine if expression of the paternal allele is reactivated. The single, triple and quadruple mutants of met1-7, drm1-2 ; drm2-2 ; cmt3-11 and met1-7;drm1-2 ; drm2-2 ; cmt3-11 were used to reduce redundancy by other methyltransferases. None of the mutant combinations showed an increased paternal expression and thus we concluded that imprinting of APC6 is not caused by these canonical DNA methyltransferases. This is consistent with previous reports where the majority of MEGs was not regulated by MET1 DNA methylation maintenance ( Hornslien et al., 2019 ). Further analysis of the epigenomic landscape of APC6 is thus required to determine if APC6 imprinting is guided by histone guided DNA methylation or other histone modifications. It is experimentally demanding to distinguish de novo transcripts after fertilization from transcripts originating from the central cell as maternal carry-over ( Evans and Kermicle, 2001 ). The APC6 expression profile is constructed from whole seed RNA (SFigure 5), and RNA originating from the seed coat or the embryo is present as discussed above. Compared to the endosperm-specifically expressed AGL36, AGL23 and AGL62 , overall expression of APC6 is higher at the early stages (1 and 2 DAP) of seed development and carry-over of transcripts from the maternal central cell, as described on a general basis ( Luo et al., 2014 ) cannot be excluded. However, at 4 DAP, allele-specific expression is mostly maternal, supporting the finding that APC6 is imprinted. Long-lived mRNAs in the endosperm have been described for endosperm maturation phase transcripts ( Matilla, 2022 ), but it seems unlikely that transcripts, originating from the maternal central cell, are abundant at the globular embryo stage. Moreover, microarray data indicated that expression of APC6 at the globular embryo stage is higher in the endosperm compared to the seed coat and embryo ( Belmonte et al., 2013 ). Additionally, the increase in paternal expression at 6 DAP could be due to a stronger impact of the growing embryo, as this coincides with consumption of the endosperm ( Nowack et al., 2010 ; Lafon-Placette and Köhler, 2014 ). As such, late-stage expression of APC6 is directed towards a parental expression ratio closer to the 1:1 diploid genotype of the embryo. Altogether, the findings of this study indicate that APC6 is a maternally expressed imprinted gene in the endosperm. The APC/C is maternally biased The APC/C is a large protein complex consisting of at least fourteen core subunits and essential for gamete development (Saleme et al., 2021). Genetic analyses have revealed that several subunits of the APC/C are essential for megagametogenesis ( APC2, APC3a/APC3b and APC10 ; ( Capron et al., 2003 ; Pérez-Pérez et al., 2008 ; Eloy et al., 2011 )) and male gametogenesis ( APC8 and APC13 ; ( Saze and Kakutani, 2007 ; Zheng et al., 2011 )). Furthermore, overexpression of APC8 displayed reduced seed set, suggesting that careful dosage regulation of APC subunits is essential for seed development ( Zheng et al., 2011 ). Here we have demonstrated that both APC6 and APC1 are imprinted and expressed predominantly from the maternal genome. Both APC/C loci lead to a gametophyte maternal effect phenotype when mutated, and double mutants suggest an additive effect on seed survival. The strong maternal expression bias of APC1 in all tested ecotypes further emphasize the importance of maternal control of the APC/C during early seed development. Interestingly, and in addition to APC6 and APC1 mutants, APC4 and APC11 also show gametophyte maternal effect phenotypes ( Kwee and Sundaresan, 2003 ; Wang et al., 2012 ; Wang et al., 2013 ; Guo et al., 2016 ), in line with the notion of APC/C being under maternal control. It remains unclear why subunits of such a crucial protein complex are subjected to parental allele-specific regulation, and the function of genomic imprinting in this regard remains to be determined. However, our data supports the gene dosage hypothesis for the evolution of genomic imprinting, which states that imprinting evolved as a mechanism to control and regulate gene expression levels ( Dilkes and Comai, 2004 ; Ferguson-Smith, 2011 ). For subunits of the APC/C, where too little or too much expression of a gene is detrimental for seed development, genomic imprinting could be a measure to balance gene expression contributing to this protein complex. Taken together, our observations propose a maternal bias to the control of endosperm proliferation. Author contributions P.E.G. designed the research; Y.S.vE., I.V.M., M.P.H., S.K. & C.M. performed the experiments; Y.S.vE., I.V.M., C.M., J.G-M & P.E.G. analyzed and discussed the data; Y.S.vE., I.V.M., J.G-M & P.E.G. wrote the article; All authors revised and approved the article. Supporting information The following supplemental materials are available. SFigure 1: Distribution of SNPs between cap2 / CAP2 and CAP2 / CAP2 . SFigure 2: GFP expression in apc6-2/+ with endosperm marker lines. SFigure 3: Verification of the APC6 transgene functionality using confocal microscopy. SFigure 4: An APC6 transgene can complement the apc6-3/+ mutant phenotype. SFigure 5: Identification of homozygous cap2, apc6-3 and apc6-2 plants after complementation with an APC6 transgene. SFigure 6: Relative expression of APC6 throughout seed development. SFigure 7: Seed development in APC6 mutants and wild-type. SFigure 8: Imprinting of APC6 is not regulated by canonical DNA methylation. SFigure 9: Characterization of apc1-2 ovules, apc1-2/+;apc6-2 mutant allele transmission and maternal expression of APC1 . STable 1: Identification of the candidate SNPs for capulet2 . STable 2: Phenotypic characterization of the embryo sac. STable 3: Primer name, sequence and comments. SData 1: SNP characterization comparison SData 2: Phenotype frequencies of capulet2, apc6-2 and apc6-3 SData 3: Phenotype frequencies of rescued capulet2 and apc6-3 SData 4: Transmission frequency capulet2, apc6-2 and apc6-3 SData 5: Extended phenotype frequencies of capulet2, apc6-2 and apc6-3 SData 6: Bioanalyzer data for APC6 in WT and methyltransferase mutants SData 7: Parental allele frequencies in APC6 and control genes SData 8: Genetic and phenotypic characterization of APC1 Footnotes Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. https://github.com/PaulGrini/capulet2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA808889 References ↵ Awasthi A , Paul P , Kumar S , Verma SK , Prasad R , Dhaliwal HS ( 2012 ) Abnormal endosperm development causes female sterility in rice insertional mutant OsAPC6 . Plant Sci 183 : 167 – 174 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Barton SC , Surani MA , Norris ML ( 1984 ) Role of paternal and maternal genomes in mouse development . Nature 311 : 374 – 376 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Batista RA , Köhler C ( 2020 ) Genomic imprinting in plants— revisiting existing models . Genes Dev . ↵ Belmonte MF , Kirkbride RC , Stone SL , Pelletier JM , Bui AQ , Yeung EC , Hashimoto M , Fei J , Harada CM , Munoz MD , et al. ( 2013 ) Comprehensive developmental profiles of gene activity in regions and subregions of the Arabidopsis seed . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110 : E435 – 44 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Birchler JA ( 1993 ) Dosage analysis of maize endosperm development . Annu Rev Genet 27 : 181 – 204 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Bjerkan KN , Alling RM , Myking IV , Brysting AK , Grini PE ( 2023 ) Genetic and environmental manipulation of Arabidopsis hybridization barriers uncovers antagonistic functions in endosperm cellularization . Front Plant Sci . doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1229060 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Bjerkan KN , Hornslien KS , Johannessen IM , Krabberød AK , van Ekelenburg YS , Kalantarian M , Shirzadi R , Comai L , Brysting AK , Bramsiepe J , et al. ( 2020 ) Genetic variation and temperature affects hybrid barriers during interspecific hybridization . Plant J 101 : 122 – 140 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Cao X , Jacobsen SE ( 2002 ) Role of the Arabidopsis DRM methyltransferases in de novo DNA methylation and gene silencing . Curr Biol 12 : 1138 – 1144 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Capron A , Serralbo O , Fülöp K , Frugier F , Parmentier Y , Dong A , Lecureuil A , Guerche P , Kondorosi E , Scheres B , et al. ( 2003 ) The Arabidopsis anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome: molecular and genetic characterization of the APC2 subunit . Plant Cell 15 : 2370 – 2382 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text Chan SW-L , Henderson IR , Zhang X , Shah G , Chien JS-C , Jacobsen SE ( 2006 ) RNAi, DRD1, and histone methylation actively target developmentally important non-CG DNA methylation in Arabidopsis . PLoS Genet 2 : e83 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Cheng C-Y , Krishnakumar V , Chan AP , Thibaud-Nissen F , Schobel S , Town CD ( 2017 ) Araport11: a complete reannotation of the Arabidopsis thaliana reference genome . Plant J 89 : 789 – 804 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Chen S , Zhou Y , Chen Y , Gu J ( 2018 ) fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor . Bioinformatics 34 : i884 – i890 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Chettoor AM , Phillips AR , Coker CT , Dilkes B , Evans MMS ( 2016 ) Maternal Gametophyte Effects on Seed Development in Maize . Genetics 204 : 233 – 248 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Choi Y , Gehring M , Johnson L , Hannon M , Harada JJ , Goldberg RB , Jacobsen SE , Fischer RL ( 2002 ) DEMETER, a DNA glycosylase domain protein, is required for endosperm gene imprinting and seed viability in Arabidopsis . Cell 110 : 33 – 42 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Clough SJ , Bent AF ( 1998 ) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant J 16 : 735 – 743 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Colombo L , Franken J , Van der Krol AR , Wittich PE , Dons HJM , Angenent GC ( 1997 ) Downregulation of Ovule-Specific MADS Box Genes from Petunia Results in Maternally Controlled Defects in Seed Development . The Plant Cell 9 : 703 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Colombo M , Masiero S , Vanzulli S , Lardelli P , Kater MM , Colombo L ( 2008 ) AGL23, a type I MADS-box gene that controls female gametophyte and embryo development in Arabidopsis . Plant J 54 : 1037 – 1048 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Dilkes BP , Comai L ( 2004 ) A differential dosage hypothesis for parental effects in seed development . Plant Cell 16 : 3174 – 3180 OpenUrl FREE Full Text ↵ van Ekelenburg YS , Hornslien KS , Van Hautegem T , Fendrych M , Van Isterdael G , Bjerkan KN , Miller JR , Nowack MK , Grini PE ( 2023 ) Spatial and temporal regulation of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the endosperm . Plant Physiol 191 : 986 – 1001 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Eloy NB , de Freitas Lima M , Ferreira PCG , Inzé D ( 2015 ) The role of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome in plant growth . CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 34 : 487 – 505 OpenUrl ↵ Eloy NB , de Freitas Lima M , Van Damme D , Vanhaeren H , Gonzalez N , De Milde L , Hemerly AS , Beemster GTS , Inzé D , Ferreira PCG ( 2011 ) The APC/C subunit 10 plays an essential role in cell proliferation during leaf development . Plant J 68 : 351 – 363 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Evans MM , Kermicle JL ( 2001 ) Interaction between maternal effect and zygotic effect mutations during maize seed development . Genetics 159 : 303 – 315 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Feil R , Berger F ( 2007 ) Convergent evolution of genomic imprinting in plants and mammals . Trends Genet 23 : 192 – 199 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Ferguson-Smith AC ( 2011 ) Genomic imprinting: the emergence of an epigenetic paradigm . Nat Rev Genet 12 : 565 – 575 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Finnegan EJ , Jean Finnegan E , Dennis ES ( 1993 ) Isolation and identification by sequence homology of a putative cytosine methyltransferase from Arabidopsis thaliana . Nucleic Acids Research 21 : 2383 – 2388 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Gehring M ( 2013 ) Genomic imprinting: insights from plants . Annu Rev Genet 47 : 187 – 208 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Gehring M , Huh JH , Hsieh T-F , Penterman J , Choi Y , Harada JJ , Goldberg RB , Fischer RL ( 2006 ) DEMETER DNA glycosylase establishes MEDEA polycomb gene self-imprinting by allele-specific demethylation . Cell 124 : 495 – 506 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Gehring M , Satyaki PR ( 2017 ) Endosperm and Imprinting, Inextricably Linked . Plant Physiol 173 : 143 – 154 OpenUrl FREE Full Text ↵ Grini PE , Jürgens G , Hülskamp M ( 2002 ) Embryo and endosperm development is disrupted in the female gametophytic capulet mutants of Arabidopsis . Genetics 162 : 1911 – 1925 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Grini PE , Schnittger A , Schwarz H , Zimmermann I , Schwab B , Jürgens G , Hülskamp M ( 1999 ) Isolation of ethyl methanesulfonate-induced gametophytic mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana by a segregation distortion assay using the multimarker chromosome 1 . Genetics 151 : 849 – 863 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Guo L , Jiang L , Zhang Y , Lu X-L , Xie Q , Weijers D , Liu C-M ( 2016 ) The anaphase-promoting complex initiates zygote division in Arabidopsis through degradation of cyclin B1 . Plant J 86 : 161 – 174 OpenUrl PubMed ↵ Gutiérrez-Marcos JF , Costa LM , Evans MMS ( 2006 ) Maternal gametophytic baseless1 is required for development of the central cell and early endosperm patterning in maize (Zea mays) . Genetics 174 : 317 – 329 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Hornslien KS , Miller JR , Grini PE ( 2019 ) Regulation of Parent-of-Origin Allelic Expression in the Endosperm . Plant Physiol 180 : 1498 – 1519 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Iwase A , Harashima H , Ikeuchi M , Rymen B , Ohnuma M , Komaki S , Morohashi K , Kurata T , Nakata M , Ohme-Takagi M , et al. ( 2017 ) WIND1 promotes shoot regeneration through transcriptional activation of ENHANCER OF SHOOT REGENERATION1 in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell 29 : 54 – 69 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Johnston DS , St Johnston D , Nüsslein-Volhard C ( 1992 ) The origin of pattern and polarity in the Drosophila embryo . Cell 68 : 201 – 219 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Kang I-H , Steffen JG , Portereiko MF , Lloyd A , Drews GN ( 2008 ) The AGL62 MADS domain protein regulates cellularization during endosperm development in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell 20 : 635 – 647 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Kanno T , Bucher E , Daxinger L , Huettel B , Böhmdorfer G , Gregor W , Kreil DP , Matzke M , Matzke AJM ( 2008 ) A structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain–containing protein is required for RNA-directed DNA methylation . Nat Genet 40 : 670 – 675 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Kinoshita T , Miura A , Choi Y , Kinoshita Y , Cao X , Jacobsen SE , Fischer RL , Kakutani T ( 2004 ) One-way control of FWA imprinting in Arabidopsis endosperm by DNA methylation . Science 303 : 521 – 523 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Köhler C , Grossniklaus U ( 2005 ) Seed development and genomic imprinting in plants . Prog Mol Subcell Biol 38 : 237 – 262 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Köhler C , Page DR , Gagliardini V , Grossniklaus U ( 2005 ) The Arabidopsis thaliana MEDEA Polycomb group protein controls expression of PHERES1 by parental imprinting . Nat Genet 37 : 28 – 30 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Krueger F ( 2012 ) Trim Galore: a wrapper tool around Cutadapt and FastQC to consistently apply quality and adapter trimming to FastQ files, with some extra functionality for MspI-digested RRBS-type (Reduced Representation Bisufite-Seq) libraries . URL http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/ . (Date of access: 28/04/2016 ) ↵ Kwee H-S , Sundaresan V ( 2003 ) The NOMEGA gene required for female gametophyte development encodes the putative APC6/CDC16 component of the Anaphase Promoting Complex in Arabidopsis . Plant J 36 : 853 – 866 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Lafon-Placette C , Köhler C ( 2014 ) Embryo and endosperm, partners in seed development . Curr Opin Plant Biol 17 : 64 – 69 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Langmead B , Salzberg SL ( 2012 ) Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2 . Nat Methods 9 : 357 – 359 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Li H ( 2011 ) Improving SNP discovery by base alignment quality . Bioinformatics 27 : 1157 – 1158 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Li H , Handsaker B , Wysoker A , Fennell T , Ruan J , Homer N , Marth G , Abecasis G , Durbin R , 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup ( 2009 ) The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools . Bioinformatics 25 : 2078 – 2079 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Lindroth AM , Cao X , Jackson JP , Zilberman D , McCallum CM , Henikoff S , Jacobsen SE ( 2001 ) Requirement of CHROMOMETHYLASE3 for maintenance of CpXpG methylation . Science 292 : 2077 – 2080 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Luo A , Shi C , Zhang L , Sun M-X ( 2014 ) The expression and roles of parent-of-origin genes in early embryogenesis of angiosperms . Front Plant Sci 5 : 729 OpenUrl PubMed ↵ Makarevich G , Villar CBR , Erilova A , Köhler C ( 2008 ) Mechanism of PHERES1 imprinting in Arabidopsis . J Cell Sci 121 : 906 – 912 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Martienssen RA , Colot V ( 2001 ) DNA methylation and epigenetic inheritance in plants and filamentous fungi . Science 293 : 1070 – 1074 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Martin M ( 2011 ) Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads . EMBnet.journal 17 : 10 – 12 OpenUrl ↵ Mathieu O , Reinders J , Caikovski M , Smathajitt C , Paszkowski J ( 2007 ) Transgenerational stability of the Arabidopsis epigenome is coordinated by CG methylation . Cell 130 : 851 – 862 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Matilla AJ ( 2022 ) Exploring Breakthroughs in Three Traits Belonging to Seed Life . Plants . doi: 10.3390/plants11040490 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Matzke MA , Mosher RA ( 2014 ) RNA-directed DNA methylation: an epigenetic pathway of increasing complexity . Nat Rev Genet 15 : 394 – 408 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Mike FC and Trevor L Davis ( 2022 ) ggpattern: “ggplot2” Pattern Geoms . https://github.com/coolbutuseless/ggpattern ↵ Montgomery SA , Berger F ( 2021 ) The evolution of imprinting in plants: beyond the seed . Plant Reprod 34 : 373 – 383 OpenUrl PubMed ↵ Moreno-Romero J , Del Toro-De León G , Yadav VK , Santos-González J , Köhler C ( 2019 ) Epigenetic signatures associated with imprinted paternally expressed genes in the Arabidopsis endosperm . Genome Biol 20 : 41 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Moreno-Romero J , Jiang H , Santos-González J , Köhler C ( 2016 ) Parental epigenetic asymmetry of PRC2-mediated histone modifications in the Arabidopsis endosperm . EMBO J 35 : 1298 – 1311 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Nakamura S , Mano S , Tanaka Y , Ohnishi M , Nakamori C , Araki M , Niwa T , Nishimura M , Kaminaka H , Nakagawa T , et al. ( 2010 ) Gateway binary vectors with the bialaphos resistance gene, bar, as a selection marker for plant transformation . Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 74 : 1315 – 1319 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Neff MM , Turk E , Kalishman M ( 2002 ) Web-based primer design for single nucleotide polymorphism analysis . Trends Genet 18 : 613 – 615 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Nowack MK , Ungru A , Bjerkan KN , Grini PE , Schnittger A ( 2010 ) Reproductive cross-talk: seed development in flowering plants . Biochem Soc Trans 38 : 604 – 612 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Olsen O-A ( 2004 ) Nuclear endosperm development in cereals and Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant Cell 16 Suppl: S214 – 27 OpenUrl FREE Full Text ↵ Pagnussat GC , Yu H-J , Ngo QA , Rajani S , Mayalagu S , Johnson CS , Capron A , Xie L-F , Ye D , Sundaresan V ( 2005 ) Genetic and molecular identification of genes required for female gametophyte development and function in Arabidopsis . Development 132 : 603 – 614 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Pérez-Pérez JM , Serralbo O , Vanstraelen M , González C , Criqui M-C , Genschik P , Kondorosi E , Scheres B ( 2008 ) Specialization of CDC27 function in the Arabidopsis thaliana anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C) . Plant J 53 : 78 – 89 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Phillips AR , Evans MMS ( 2011 ) Analysis of stunter1, a maize mutant with reduced gametophyte size and maternal effects on seed development . Genetics 187 : 1085 – 1097 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Pignatta D , Erdmann RM , Scheer E , Picard CL , Bell GW , Gehring M ( 2014 ) Natural epigenetic polymorphisms lead to intraspecific variation in Arabidopsis gene imprinting . Elife 3 : e03198 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Rodrigues JA , Zilberman D ( 2015 ) Evolution and function of genomic imprinting in plants . Genes Dev 29 : 2517 – 2531 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text Saleme M de LS , Andrade IR , Eloy NB ( 2021 ) The Role of Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) in Plant Reproduction . Front Plant Sci 12 : 642934 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Satyaki PRV , Gehring M ( 2019 ) Paternally Acting Canonical RNA-Directed DNA Methylation Pathway Genes Sensitize Arabidopsis Endosperm to Paternal Genome Dosage . Plant Cell 31 : 1563 – 1578 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Saze H , Kakutani T ( 2007 ) Heritable epigenetic mutation of a transposon-flanked Arabidopsis gene due to lack of the chromatin-remodeling factor DDM1 . EMBO J 26 : 3641 – 3652 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Schindelin J , Arganda-Carreras I , Frise E , Kaynig V , Longair M , Pietzsch T , Preibisch S , Rueden C , Saalfeld S , Schmid B , et al. ( 2012 ) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis . Nat Methods 9 : 676 – 682 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Scholl RL , May ST , Ware DH ( 2000 ) Seed and molecular resources for Arabidopsis . Plant Physiol 124 : 1477 – 1480 OpenUrl FREE Full Text ↵ Schon MA , Nodine MD ( 2017 ) Widespread Contamination of Arabidopsis Embryo and Endosperm Transcriptome Data Sets . Plant Cell 29 : 608 – 617 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Shirzadi R , Andersen ED , Bjerkan KN , Gloeckle BM , Heese M , Ungru A , Winge P , Koncz C , Aalen RB , Schnittger A , et al. ( 2011 ) Genome-Wide Transcript Profiling of Endosperm without Paternal Contribution Identifies Parent-of-Origin–Dependent Regulation of AGAMOUS-LIKE36 . PLoS Genet 7 : e1001303 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Stroud H , Do T , Du J , Zhong X , Feng S , Johnson L , Patel DJ , Jacobsen SE ( 2014 ) Non-CG methylation patterns shape the epigenetic landscape in Arabidopsis . Nat Struct Mol Biol 21 : 64 – 72 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Sun H , Schneeberger K ( 2015 ) SHOREmap v3.0: fast and accurate identification of causal mutations from forward genetic screens . Methods Mol Biol 1284 : 381 – 395 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Vu TM , Nakamura M , Calarco JP , Susaki D , Lim PQ , Kinoshita T , Higashiyama T , Martienssen RA , Berger F ( 2013 ) RNA-directed DNA methylation regulates parental genomic imprinting at several loci in Arabidopsis . Development 140 : 2953 – 2960 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Wang Y , Hou Y , Gu H , Kang D , Chen Z , Liu J , Qu L-J ( 2012 ) The Arabidopsis APC4 subunit of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is critical for both female gametogenesis and embryogenesis . Plant J 69 : 227 – 240 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Wang Y , Hou Y , Gu H , Kang D , Chen Z-L , Liu J , Qu L-J ( 2013 ) The Arabidopsis anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome subunit 1 is critical for both female gametogenesis and embryogenesis(F) . J Integr Plant Biol 55 : 64 – 74 OpenUrl PubMed ↵ Wickham H ( 2011 ) The Split-Apply-Combine Strategy for Data Analysis . J Stat Softw 40 : 1 – 29 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Wickham H ( 2016 ) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis . Springer-Verlag New York ↵ Wolff P , Weinhofer I , Seguin J , Roszak P , Beisel C , Donoghue MTA , Spillane C , Nordborg M , Rehmsmeier M , Köhler C ( 2011 ) High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the Arabidopsis Endosperm . PLoS Genet 7 : e1002126 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Wolf JB , Wade MJ ( 2009 ) What are maternal effects (and what are they not)? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364 : 1107 – 1115 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Xiao W , Gehring M , Choi Y , Margossian L , Pu H , Harada JJ , Goldberg RB , Pennell RI , Fischer RL ( 2003 ) Imprinting of the MEA Polycomb gene is controlled by antagonism between MET1 methyltransferase and DME glycosylase . Dev Cell 5 : 891 – 901 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Yadegari R , Drews GN ( 2004 ) Female gametophyte development . Plant Cell 16 Suppl: S133 – 41 OpenUrl FREE Full Text ↵ Zhang X , Jacobsen SE ( 2006 ) Genetic analyses of DNA methyltransferases in Arabidopsis thaliana . Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 71 : 439 – 447 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Zheng B , Chen X , McCormick S ( 2011 ) The anaphase-promoting complex is a dual integrator that regulates both MicroRNA-mediated transcriptional regulation of cyclin B1 and degradation of Cyclin B1 during Arabidopsis male gametophyte development . Plant Cell 23 : 1033 – 1046 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted September 11, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Molecular characterization of capulet2 reveals the importance of ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX 6 maternal expression in endosperm development Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Molecular characterization of capulet2 reveals the importance of ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX 6 maternal expression in endosperm development Yuri S. van Ekelenburg , Ida V. Myking , Cathal Meehan , Morten P. Hauger , Shinichiro Komaki , Keiko Sugimoto , José Gutierrez-Marcos , Paul E. Grini bioRxiv 2025.09.09.675171; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.09.675171 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Molecular characterization of capulet2 reveals the importance of ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX 6 maternal expression in endosperm development Yuri S. van Ekelenburg , Ida V. Myking , Cathal Meehan , Morten P. Hauger , Shinichiro Komaki , Keiko Sugimoto , José Gutierrez-Marcos , Paul E. Grini bioRxiv 2025.09.09.675171; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.09.675171 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Developmental Biology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7629) Biochemistry (17660) Bioengineering (13881) Bioinformatics (41911) Biophysics (21436) Cancer Biology (18578) Cell Biology (25482) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13371) Ecology (19887) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24302) Genetics (15599) Genomics (22483) Immunology (17728) Microbiology (40364) Molecular Biology (17163) Neuroscience (88537) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2830) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4821) Physiology (7637) Plant Biology (15129) Scientific Communication and Education (2045) Synthetic Biology (4290) Systems Biology (9817) Zoology (2269)