Abstract
A bstract Biosafety risk assessment traditionally relies on categorical scales embodied by the four WHO Risk Groups and biocontainment levels. Mapping such categories to quantitative metrics is an open problem for the field: the classifications are too coarse for operational decision-making, yet strictly probabilistic language remains inaccessible to most safety professionals, laboratory managers, and decision-makers. To bridge these gaps, the present work develops a quantitative Bayesian framework for laboratory risk management that combines WHO Risk Group classification as a prior with a Markov chain model of the incident–disaster escalation chain. Risk is reported on a log-risk scale that transforms multiplicative probabilities into additive quantities, mirroring the decibel scale in acoustics. The framework accommodates longitudinal updating with local incident data and quantifies the separate contributions of training, preventive maintenance, and inspection to system-level safety. Resource allocation recommendations are derived that complement existing compliance frameworks with auditable, evidence-based prioritisation. The framework is illustrated on synthetic BSL-3 scenarios and shifts the perspective of biorisk governance from static compliance assessment to dynamic risk and resource management.
Full text
1,401 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Biosafety risk assessment traditionally relies on categorical scales embodied by the four WHO Risk Groups and biocontainment levels. Mapping such categories to quantitative metrics is an open problem for the field: the classifications are too coarse for operational decision-making, yet strictly probabilistic language remains inaccessible to most safety professionals, laboratory managers, and decision-makers. To bridge these gaps, the present work develops a quantitative Bayesian framework for laboratory risk management that combines WHO Risk Group classification as a prior with a Markov chain model of the incident–disaster escalation chain. Risk is reported on a log-risk scale that transforms multiplicative probabilities into additive quantities, mirroring the decibel scale in acoustics. The framework accommodates longitudinal updating with local incident data and quantifies the separate contributions of training, preventive maintenance, and inspection to system-level safety. Resource allocation recommendations are derived that complement existing compliance frameworks with auditable, evidence-based prioritisation. The framework is illustrated on synthetic BSL-3 scenarios and shifts the perspective of biorisk governance from static compliance assessment to dynamic risk and resource management.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.