Unsupervised Representation Learning Generates Differentiable Neurophysiological Profiles

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Human brain activity contains stable, individual-specific features that persist over months to years, forming neurophysiological profiles. Most model-based profiling approaches use participant labels or supervised objectives, making it difficult to determine whether successful differentiation reflects stable biology or exploitable idiosyncrasies. We introduce a participant-agnostic autoencoder framework that derives profiles from brief resting-state magnetoencephalography (MEG) segments using reconstruction as sole training objective. Discriminative profiles emerged from the learned latent space without participant labels. Within-session, autoencoder profiles reached 93.3% accuracy at 120 s, exceeding functional-connectivity, spectral, and contrastive baselines with recordings as short as 14 s when participant-specific anatomy was withheld from source reconstruction. Differentiation generalized above chance across recording sessions (between-session accuracy 49.5% for the pretrained autoencoder). Profiles also predicted age more accurately than baselines (r^2=0.318), and the decoder enabled perturbation-based sensitivity analyses in spectral and connectivity spaces. This establishes participant-agnostic representation learning as a scalable and interpretable profiling.
Full text 1,380 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Recent neuroimaging research has shown that human brain activity expresses stable, individual-specific features that persist over months to years, defining neurophysiological profiles. Current model-based profiling relies on labeled data and supervised learning, leaving open whether they exploit idiosyncratic artifacts or genuine biology. We introduce a participant-agnostic autoencoder framework to derive differentiable profiles from brief segments of resting-state magnetoencephalography (MEG). Despite an unsupervised objective, discriminative profiles emerged naturally from the learned latent space, outperforming model-free and model-based baselines in participant differentiation. Reliable differentiation was achieved using recordings as short as 14 s, generalized across recording sessions, and remained robust without anatomical information. Beyond differentiation, learned profiles predicted age more accurately than baselines, and the decoder enabled perturbation-based sensitivity analyses directly in spectral and connectivity spaces. These results establish participant-agnostic modeling as a principled and interpretable framework for neurophysiological profiling that generalizes across sessions while preserving sensitivity to biologically relevant individual differences. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00