Social implications of human food subsidies on wildlife populations

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,845 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Human activities—intentionally or not—generate a variety of novel food sources that wild animals exploit. On land and in water, human food sources can profoundly alter intraspecific interactions with cascading effects on population dynamics and ecosystem functioning. Yet, despite their growing ecological relevance, the role of human food subsidies in shaping intraspecific interactions remains underexplored. We propose a novel framework that highlights how key characteristics of human food—such as high abundance, predictability, increased proximity to humans, and dietary composition—shape social interactions. Specifically, we discuss how individual-level changes in fitness, time allocation, movement, and social choices can shape group size and composition, the quantity and quality of social interactions, as well as the social structure, with implications for social transmission (of stress, information, or diseases), selection, and development. Collectively, these alterations highlight the broad social implications that intentional and unintentional human food subsidies can have for ecological and evolutionary processes in wildlife populations. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X21D2T Subjects Life Sciences

Keywords

anthropogenic environmental change, food provisioning, human-wildlife interactions, foraging, social behaviour, Social structure, wildlife feeding, intraspecific interactions, human food subsidies Dates Published: 2025-09-23 09:05 Last Updated: 2025-09-23 09:05 License CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest Data and Code Availability Statement: No data were used for this article Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00