Robust evidence for modest diversity loss across the K/Pg in neoselachians: Response to Guinot et al

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,411 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Summary We reconstructed the neoselachian diversity over the past 145 million years using new occurrence dataset and DeepDive1-3. We recovered a small decline through the K/Pg following a steady increase during the Cretaceous, and a prolonged, substantial decline towards the present following a mid-Eocene peak2. Guinot et al.4 argue that our conclusions are compromised by problems in the underlying data and by the way extinction magnitude across the K/Pg was quantified. They cast doubt particularly on the pattern across the K/Pg, which they consider to be at odds with all previous analyses. They raise no issue with the Cretaceous trend, even though it was recovered with the same dataset and methods. We audited the alleged data issues reported in Guinot et al.4 and found that they mostly reflect operational choices (see Supplementary Information). However, we applied their data treatment and ran sensitivity tests to evaluate how this approach affects our results, specifically around the K/Pg. None of our tests recovered a diversity collapse for neoselachians during this interval. As such, we demonstrate that our findings are robust and consistent across different data treatments. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes ↵10 Lead contact This version has been revised to include a citation to a preprint version of the commentary by Guinot et al.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00