Full text
30,626 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Factors Influencing Hospital Nurses Performance In Accordance With Clinical Authority: A Literature Review | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Factors Influencing Hospital Nurses Performance In Accordance With Clinical Authority: A Literature Review View ORCID Profile Menik Kustriyani , View ORCID Profile Arief Yanto doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.11.25335258 Menik Kustriyani 1 Nursing Program, Universitas Widya Husada Semarang , Jl. Subali Raya No.12, Krapyak, Semarang, Central Java 50146 Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Menik Kustriyani Arief Yanto 2 Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang , Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18 Semarang, Central Java 50273 Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Arief Yanto For correspondence: arief.yanto{at}unimus.ac.id Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Background Hospital nurses performance within their clinical authority is pivotal to patient safety and care quality. Recent scholarship (2021-2025) indicates that performance is not solely a function of individual competence but is shaped by a dynamic interplay of organizational, individual, and environmental factors. Purpose This literature review aimed to synthesize current evidence on the determinants that facilitate or impede hospital nurses performance in accordance with their clinical authority, and to highlight gaps for future research. Methods A systematic search of peer-reviewed articles published between 2021 and 2025 was conducted across major nursing and health services databases. Inclusion criteria comprised empirical studies (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods) that examined factors influencing nurses performance, leadership, empowerment, workload, or environmental considerations. Selected articles were screened, coded, and thematically analyzed to identify recurring determinants, barriers, and facilitators. Results The synthesis revealed four core determinants: (1) supportive clinical leadership, which exerts the strongest direct and indirect influence on performance (0.35); (2) manageable workloads, mitigating role conflict between patient care priority and environmental stewardship; (3) structural empowerment and professional autonomy, linked to innovative behaviours (0.63) mediated by organizational climate; and (4) positive organizational climate/team climate, fostering collaboration. Prominent barriers included hierarchical cultures, resource shortages, and insufficient mentorship. Environmental awareness, while present, was often subordinated to immediate clinical duties due to time constraints and lack of institutional support. Conclusion Hospital nurses performance under clinical authority is governed by a complex nexus of leadership, workload, empowerment, and climate factors. Targeted organizational interventions, coupled with rigorous research in diverse contexts, are essential to optimize nursing performance and sustain high-quality patient care. Introduction Hospital nurses’ performance, particularly in exercising their clinical authority, is a cornerstone of healthcare quality and patient safety. Adhering to clinical authority allows nurses to deliver care that matches their training and credentialed competencies, leading to improved patient outcomes and satisfaction. Empowering nurses with appropriate clinical authority is consistently linked to better patient care and more effective health systems, as it enables timely, evidence-based decision-making and interventions (Pujianti et al., 2024; Yanto and Kustriyani, 2023). When nurses operate within their defined scope, patient safety is enhanced, and the risk of errors or adverse events is reduced (Supri et al., 2019). Clinical authority refers to the scope and autonomy nurses possess to make clinical decisions and perform interventions within their professional competencies. Working within clinical authority fosters professionalism and confidence among nurses. Nurses who practice according to their competencies are more likely to feel confident, satisfied, and motivated, which in turn positively affects their performance and patient satisfaction (Supri et al., 2019). Structured career paths and clear clinical authority also promote responsibility, adherence to standards, and mutual trust within healthcare teams (Pujianti et al., 2024). Understanding the factors that influence nurses’ ability to perform in accordance with their clinical authority is critical, as it directly impacts patient outcomes, staff satisfaction, and organizational effectiveness (Hyun and Lee, 2021; Kalogirou et al., 2021). The researcher aims to conduct a literature review on the topic “Factors Influencing Hospital Nurses’ Performance in Accordance With Clinical Authority.” The review will synthesize evidence on nine core determinants organizational structure, individual nurse characteristics, work-environment conditions, professional regulation, clinical leadership, advanced education, inter-professional collaboration, motivational aspects, and performance evaluation systems. An additional impetus for this review is that the enactment of clinical authority by nurses in Indonesia remains considerably limited, potentially compromising the quality of nursing care, reducing nurses’ participation in clinical decision-making, and adversely affecting patient safety and outcomes. Method This research uses a literature review approach the databases used are Scopus, Science Direct, PubMed, and Dimensions. The strategy used to search the literature by enter the keywords: nurse* OR nursing OR “registered nurse*” OR RN AND performance* OR outcome* OR effectiveness OR quality OR productivity OR efficiency AND authority* OR empower* OR autonom* OR “decision making” OR leadership OR power. Inclusion criteria were: articles published in English between 2021 and 2025, full-text availability, and relevance to the themes of nurses performance clinical authority. Exclusion criteria were: publications older than five years, review articles, and studies published in Indonesian. There were 4,868 articles from the Scopus database, 10 articles from Sciencedirect, 89 articles from PubMed, and 10 articles from Dimensions, so the total articles obtained are 4,977 articles. After screening based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 23 research articles were obtained consisting international articles. View this table: View inline View popup Table 1. PICOS Table for Article Screening Results 1. Organizational Context Patient-care priority vs. environmental stewardship: Kalogirou et al. revealed that nurses view patient outcomes as the primary duty, relegating environmental considerations to a secondary concern when workload is high. Implications for performance: When organisational policies do not integrate sustainability into routine workflows, nurses experience role conflict, potentially diminishing overall performance quality. 2. Clinical Leadership, Team Climate & Structural Empowerment Leadership’s central role: Kuşcu Karatepe & Türkmen demonstrated that clinical leadership exerts the strongest standardized influence (β =.35) on performance, both directly and via a supportive creative team climate (β =.23) and structural empowerment (β =.19). Variance explained: Together these factors account for 39 % of performance variability, underscoring leadership as a lever for improvement. 3. Empowerment, Autonomy & Innovation Head-nurse empowerment: Lu et al. found a robust positive relationship (β = 0.635) between head-nurse empowerment and nurses’ innovative behaviour, mediated heavily (≈ 71 %) by organizational climate and professional autonomy. Practical takeaway: Empowering senior nurses and fostering autonomy creates a fertile ground for innovative practice, which in turn enhances performance aligned with clinical authority. 4. Environmental Awareness & Sustainable Behaviour Awareness-behaviour link: Luque-Alcaraz et al. showed that nurses with higher environmental awareness are significantly more likely to engage in sustainable actions (p < 0.05). Barriers: Time constraints, insufficient resources (e.g., recycling bins), and limited leadership advocacy hinder translation of awareness into practice. 5. Data-Driven Staffing & Complexity Prediction Bürgin et al. illustrated how routine administrative data can predict case complexity, informing needs-based staff planning. Although predictive accuracy is modest, calibrated models can support managers in aligning staffing levels with patient acuity, indirectly affecting nurse performance through workload balance. View this table: View inline View popup Table 2. Results of Data Synthesis Discussion 1. Clinical Leadership and Structural Empowerment The empirical evidence consistently underscores clinical leadership as the most potent driver of nursing performance. Kuşcu Karatepe & Türkmen (2023) reported a standardized coefficient of β = 0.35, indicating that transformational leadership alone accounts for 39 % of the variance in nurse performance. Moreover, this effect is partially mediated through a creative team climate (β = 0.23) and structural empowerment (β = 0.19) (Kuşcu Karatepe and Türkmen, 2023). Conflict of Theory Two dominant theoretical frameworks clash in interpreting these findings: 1.1. Transformational Leadership Theory (Bass, 1990) Leaders inspire shared vision, foster intrinsic motivation, and empower followers to exceed routine expectations. Strongly supported: high β values, indirect pathways via empowerment and team climate. 1.2. Transactional Leadership Theory (Burns, 1978) Leadership is based on contingent reward-punishment mechanisms that focus on extrinsic incentives. Weaker association (Lee et al., 2022) suggests limited impact on innovative nursing behaviors. Implications for Nursing Practice 1.1. Leadership Development Programs Curricula for nurse managers should prioritize transformational competencies (vision-casting, coaching, individualized consideration) and include simulation-based training that demonstrates how to translate vision into concrete policies. 1.2. Organizational Architecture Healthcare institutions must institutionalize mechanisms for structural empowerment transparent access to clinical data, participation in decision-making forums, and robust mentorship pathways. 1.3. Performance Measurement Appraisal systems should incorporate validated instruments such as the Leadership Climate Survey and Kanter’s Empowerment Scale as predictive indicators of nursing performance alongside traditional clinical metrics. 2. Environmental Sustainability as a Dimension of Nursing Performance The convergence of green nursing initiatives with traditional patient-care imperatives remains contested. Kalogirou (2021) identified a role-conflict where nurses prioritize direct patient care over environmentally sustainable actions, despite moderate environmental awareness. Conversely, Luque-Alcaraz (2024) highlighted the potential synergy that emerges when structural resources (e.g., automated waste-segregation systems) are provided. Conflict of Theory 2.1. Green Nursing Paradigm (McGain & Naylor, 2020) Sustainability and quality care are complementary; nurses will adopt green practices when they recognize ecological benefits. Luque-Alcaraz (2024) demonstrate increased green behaviors when institutional support is present. 2.2. Task-Priority Model (Kahn et al., 1964) High clinical workload monopolizes cognitive resources, diminishing capacity for additional tasks such as recycling. Kalogirou (2021) show reduced green actions in high acuity units. Implications for Nursing Practice 2.1. Policy Integration Embed sustainability protocols directly into standard operating procedures (e.g., use of recyclable infusion sets, electronic documentation to reduce paper waste) so that green actions become part of routine care rather than an optional add-on. 2.2. Educational Enrichment Revise undergraduate and continuing-education curricula to include Sustainability Science for Nurses, emphasizing evidence-based environmental interventions that do not compromise patient safety. 2.3. Outcome Metrics Introduce sustainability indicators (e.g., kilograms of medical waste diverted, energy consumption per patient day) into the nursing performance dashboard, aligning incentives with environmental stewardship. 3. Innovation, Professional Autonomy, and Self-Determination (Lu et al., 2025) demonstrated that head-nurse empowerment predicts innovative behavior (β = 0.635) with a mediation effect of 71 % through an empowering organizational climate and professional autonomy. This finding resonates with Self-Determination Theory (SDT) (Deci & Ryan, 2000), which posits that fulfillment of the basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness fuels intrinsic motivation and creative output. Conflict of Theory 3.1. SDT-Based Innovation Model Autonomy and supportive climates directly stimulate innovation. Strong empirical support (high β, high mediation). 3.2. Resource-Constraint Model (Herzberg, 1966) Innovation is inhibited when nurses face excessive workload and limited material resources. Evident in settings lacking adequate staffing or equipment, where empowerment does not translate into innovation. Implications for Nursing Practice 3.1. Empowerment Structures Create formalized clinical practice councils where head nurses and frontline staff co-design workflow improvements, ensuring that decision-making authority is distributed. 3.2. Resource Allocation Guarantee access to simulation labs, evidence-based practice tools, and time allowances for quality-improvement projects, mitigating the resource-constraint barrier. 3.3. Recognition Systems Develop award programs that celebrate innovative nursing solutions, reinforcing the link between autonomy, competence, and professional identity. 4. Synthesis and Future Directions The converging evidence delineates a triadic nexus: 4.1. Leadership that is transformational and structurally empowering 4.2. Sustainability integrated into clinical routines 4.3. Professional autonomy nurtured within a resource-rich, supportive climate When these elements co-exist, they produce synergistic effects on nursing performance enhancing patient outcomes, fostering environmentally responsible practices, and catalyzing innovation. Conversely, the absence or misalignment of any component precipitates theoretical conflicts that manifest as performance deficits. Future research should adopt multilevel longitudinal designs to examine how fluctuations in leadership style, empowerment policies, and sustainability initiatives jointly influence nurses’ intrinsic motivation and performance over time. Practically, health-care organizations are encouraged to holistically redesign their governance, operational, and educational frameworks to operationalize the integrated model presented herein. Conclusion Recent literature (2021–2025) underscores that hospital nurses’ performance within their clinical authority is shaped by a dynamic interplay of organizational, individual, and environmental factors. Key determinants include supportive leadership, manageable workloads, empowerment, and a positive organizational climate. Barriers such as hierarchical culture, resource shortages, and lack of support persist, but can be mitigated through comprehensive leadership development, mentorship, and culture change interventions. There is an urgent need for validated, context-sensitive measurement tools and research in diverse settings, particularly LMICs, to optimize nurse performance and clinical authority. Data Availability All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript References 1. Alanazi , F.J. , Mersal , F.A ., 2025 . A Descriptive Exploratory Study on the Role of Leadership Styles in Fostering Work Performance and Autonomy in Nurses’ Decision-Making. Salud , Ciencia y Tecnologia 5 . doi: 10.56294/SALUDCYT20251525 OpenUrl CrossRef 2. Alaseeri , R. , Rajab , A. , Banakhar , M ., 2021 . Do personal differences and organizational factors influence nurses’ decision making? A qualitative study . Nurs Rep 11 , 714 – 727 . doi: 10.3390/NURSREP11030067 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. Alexander , C. , Tschannen , D. , Argetsinger , D. , Hakim , H. , Milner , K.A ., 2022 . A qualitative study on barriers and facilitators of quality improvement engagement by frontline nurses and leaders . J Nurs Manag 30 , 694 – 701 . doi: 10.1111/JONM.13537 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. Alharbi , A. , Alkubati , S.A. , Albaqawi , H. , Ali , A.Z. , Hamed , L.A. , Mohammed , S. , Cornejo , L.T.O. , Pasay-an , E ., 2025 . Relationship between nursing work environment and clinical decision-making among Saudi nurses: psychological empowerment as mediator . BMC Nurs 24 . doi: 10.1186/S12912-025-03482-2 OpenUrl CrossRef 5. Atashi , V. , Movahedi Najafabadi , M. , Afshari , A. , Ghafari , S ., 2024 . Barriers to effective clinical supervision from the perspective of nurses: A descriptive qualitative study . Nurs Open 11 . doi: 10.1002/NOP2.2028 OpenUrl CrossRef 6. Bartmess , M.P. , Myers , C.R. , Thomas , S.P ., 2022 . Original Research: “It Would Be Nice to Think We Could Have a Voice”: Exploring RN Involvement in Hospital Staffing Policymaking . American Journal of Nursing 122 , 22 – 31 . doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000884564.75005.A9 OpenUrl CrossRef 7. Beiboer , C. , Andela , R. , Hafsteinsdóttir , T.B. , Weldam , S. , Holtrop , T. , van der Cingel , M. , 2023 . Teamwork, clinical leadership skills and environmental factors that influence missed nursing care – A qualitative study on hospital wards . Nurse Educ Pract 68 . doi: 10.1016/J.NEPR.2023.103603 OpenUrl CrossRef 8. Bürgin , R. , Ranegger , R. , Baumberger , D. , Jagfeld , G ., 2024 . Predictor Selection for Case Complexity Based on Routine Data for Needs-Based and Competence-Based Staff Planning . Stud Health Technol Inform 315 , 332 – 336 . doi: 10.3233/SHTI240164 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 9. Casales-Hernández , M.G. , Reyes-Morales , H. , Nigenda , G. , García-Saisó , S ., 2023 . Exploring facilitators and barriers to implementing expanded nursing roles in Mexico . Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica/Pan American Journal of Public Health 47 . doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2023.142 OpenUrl CrossRef 10. Crawford , C.L. , Rondinelli , J. , Zuniga , S. , Valdez , R.M. , Tze-Polo , L. , Titler , M.G ., 2023 . Barriers and facilitators influencing EBP readiness: Building organizational and nurse capacity . Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 20 , 27 – 36 . doi: 10.1111/WVN.12618 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 11. Dunlap , E. , Fitzpatrick , S ., 2023 . Mentorship Education for Advanced Practice Registered Nurses . J Dr Nurs Pract 16 , 220 – 228 . doi: 10.1891/JDNP-2023-0015 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 12. Harlan , M.D. , Skrovanek , E. , Torgerson , S. , Perpetua , Z. , O’Loughlin , V. , Hudack , C. , Yen , A. , Ren , D. , Sherwood , P ., 2025 . Meaningful mentorship Evaluation of a Mentorship Program to Reduce Burnout in Nursing Students and Graduate Nurses . Nurse Educ 50 , 231 – 235 . doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001915 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. Hyun , S. , Lee , T ., 2021 . Effects of Professional Autonomy and Teamwork on Clinical Performance of Nurses in Tertiary Hospitals . Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration 27 , 301 – 310 . doi: 10.11111/JKANA.2021.27.5.301 OpenUrl CrossRef 14. Kalogirou , M.R. , Dahlke , S. , Davidson , S. , Yamamoto , S ., 2021 . How the hospital context influences nurses’ environmentally responsible practice: A focused ethnography . J Adv Nurs 77 , 3806 – 3819 . doi: 10.1111/JAN.14936 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 15. Kõrgemaa , U. , Sisask , M. , Ernits , Ü ., 2025 . Nurses’ assessments of the work environment, organisational culture and work arrangements: a cross-sectional study of Estonian hospitals in 1999, 2009 and 2021 . BMC Nurs 24 . doi: 10.1186/S12912-025-03292-6 OpenUrl CrossRef 16. Kourouche , S. , Considine , J. , Li , L. , Murphy , M. , Shaban , R.Z. , Lam , M.K. , Berendsen Russell , S. , Fry , M. , Aggar , C. , Dinh , M.M. , Shetty , A. , Shaw , T. , Seimon , R. V. , Aryal , N.R. , Hughes , J.A. , Varndell , W. , Curtis , K ., 2025 . Identifying Barriers and Enablers for Nurse-Initiated Care for Designing Implementation at Scale in Australian Emergency Departments: A Mixed Methods Study . J Clin Nurs 34 , 2718 – 2736 . doi: 10.1111/JOCN.17693 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 17. Kuşcu Karatepe , H. , Türkmen , E. , 2023 . Nurse performance: A path model of clinical leadership, creative team climate and structural empowerment . J Clin Nurs 32 , 584 – 596 . doi: 10.1111/JOCN.16419 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 18. Lu , Y. , Zhai , S. , Liu , Q. , Liu , J. , Chen , C ., 2025 . The impact of head nurse empowerment on clinical nurses’ innovative behavior: the mediating role of organizational climate and professional autonomy . BMC Nurs 24 . doi: 10.1186/S12912-025-03214-6 OpenUrl CrossRef 19. Luque-Alcaraz , O.M. , Aparicio-Martínez , P. , Gomera , A. , Vaquero-Abellán , M ., 2024 . The environmental awareness of nurses as environmentally sustainable health care leaders: a mixed method analysis . BMC Nurs 23 . doi: 10.1186/S12912-024-01895-Z OpenUrl CrossRef 20. Mundie , C. , Donelle , L ., 2022 . The Environment as a Patient: A Content Analysis of Canadian Nursing Organizations and Regulatory Bodies Policies on Environmental Health . Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 54 , 464 – 473 . doi: 10.1177/08445621211035913 OpenUrl CrossRef 21. O’Neill , A. , Hooker , L. , Edvardsson , K ., 2025 . Clinical Supervision Practices With Australian Child and Family Health Nurses: Exploring Facilitators and Barriers . J Adv Nurs . doi: 10.1111/JAN.16962 OpenUrl CrossRef 22. Patarrù , F. , Purwanza , S.W ., 2024 . The development of transformational leadership model based on caring as an effort to increase nursing performance . Healthc Low Resour Settings 12 . doi: 10.4081/HLS.2023.11779 OpenUrl CrossRef 23. Pujianti , R. , Bandur , A. , Dedi , B ., 2024 . Implications Of The Implementation Of Clinical Authority On Improving The Quality Of Nursing Services . Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development 2 . doi: 10.55324/ENRICHMENT.V2I7.167 OpenUrl CrossRef 24. Schorn , M.N. , Myers , C. , Barroso , J. , Hande , K. , Hudson , T. , Kim , J. , Kleinpell , R ., 2022 . Results of a National Survey: Ongoing Barriers to APRN Practice in the United States . Policy Polit Nurs Pract 23 , 118 – 129 . doi: 10.1177/15271544221076524 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 25. Supri , A. , Rachmawaty , R. , Syahrul , S ., 2019 . Nurses’ Performance Assessment Based On Nursing Clinical Authority: A Qualitative Descriptive Study . Journal of Nursing Practice 2 , 80 – 90 . doi: 10.30994/JNP.V2I2.48 OpenUrl CrossRef 26. Tamura , T. , Bapitani , D.B.J. , Kahombo , G.U. , Minagawa , Y. , Matsuoka , S. , Oikawa , M. , Egami , Y. , Honda , M. , Nagai , M ., 2023 . Comparison of the clinical competency of nurses trained in competency-based and object-based approaches in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: A cross-sectional study . Glob Health Med 5 , 142 – 150 . doi: 10.35772/GHM.2023.01026 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 27. Yanto , A. , Kustriyani , M ., 2023 . Systematic Review on Clinical Authority of Nurses Worldwide . South East Asia Nursing Research 5 , 33 . doi: 10.26714/SEANR.5.1.2023.33-38 OpenUrl CrossRef View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted September 12, 2025. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Factors Influencing Hospital Nurses Performance In Accordance With Clinical Authority: A Literature Review Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Factors Influencing Hospital Nurses Performance In Accordance With Clinical Authority: A Literature Review Menik Kustriyani , Arief Yanto medRxiv 2025.09.11.25335258; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.11.25335258 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Factors Influencing Hospital Nurses Performance In Accordance With Clinical Authority: A Literature Review Menik Kustriyani , Arief Yanto medRxiv 2025.09.11.25335258; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.11.25335258 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Nursing Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (568) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (299) Cardiovascular Medicine (4425) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (443) Dermatology (382) Emergency Medicine (607) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1507) Epidemiology (15221) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1123) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6588) Geriatric Medicine (667) Health Economics (997) Health Informatics (4524) Health Policy (1368) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1612) Hematology (540) HIV/AIDS (1264) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15910) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (623) Medical Ethics (145) Nephrology (667) Neurology (6588) Nursing (346) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1143) Occupational and Environmental Health (956) Oncology (3331) Ophthalmology (970) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (435) Palliative Medicine (129) Pathology (663) Pediatrics (1690) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (691) Primary Care Research (710) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5440) Public and Global Health (9219) Radiology and Imaging (2195) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1369) Respiratory Medicine (1196) Rheumatology (593) Sexual and Reproductive Health (710) Sports Medicine (529) Surgery (710) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9ffcb16a0b09f047',t:'MTc3OTQ2MjA1Mw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.