S1200 Symptom Overlap Between Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Gynecologic Conditions: A Missed Diagnostic Opportunity

In: American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2025 · vol. 120(10S2) , pp. S258 · doi:10.14309/01.ajg.0001132260.99578.19 · W4416070715
article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-17 · read from full text ⓘ

This retrospective cross-sectional study utilized the NIH All of Us database to evaluate the prevalence of fibroids and endometriosis among women diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome compared to those without. The analysis revealed a significantly higher odds ratio for both conditions in the IBS cohort, with odds ratios of 3.05 for fibroids and 5.30 for endometriosis relative to controls. Although the data showed no significant difference in diagnosis timing, the authors highlight that overlapping symptoms may lead to missed gynecologic diagnoses and increased healthcare costs due to misattribution of symptoms. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Introduction: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has been diagnosed in approximately 5%-7% of the US population, with women disproportionately affected. Its nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms, such as bloating, abdominal discomfort, and altered bowel habits, overlap with those of gynecologic conditions like fibroids and endometriosis, increasing the risk of a missed diagnosis. While endometriosis has been linked to higher IBS prevalence, the association with fibroids remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess whether women diagnosed with IBS are more likely to carry a concurrent diagnosis of fibroids or endometriosis, to evaluate the potential for missed gynecologic diagnoses in this population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study using data from the National Institutes of Health All of Us database to compare the prevalence of fibroids and endometriosis in women with and without a diagnosis of IBS. We identified women diagnosed with IBS (n = 11,625), fibroids (n = 15,189), and endometriosis (n = 5,508). Prevalence rates of fibroids and endometriosis were compared between those with and without IBS. Pearson chi-square tests were used to calculate odds ratios and assess statistical significance. Results: The odds ratio for fibroids in women with IBS versus those without was 3.05 (95% CI: 2.89–3.21, P < 0.001); for endometriosis, the odds ratio was 5.30 (95% CI: 4.94–5.68, P < 0.001). Additionally, we analyzed diagnosis timing to determine whether IBS diagnosis typically precedes fibroids diagnosis and found no significant difference. Conclusion: Our findings reveal a strong association between IBS and gynecologic conditions such as fibroids and endometriosis, raising concern for missed or delayed diagnoses in women presenting with nonspecific GI symptoms. In those with concurrent diagnoses, the data did not suggest that IBS was diagnosed more frequently before fibroids. While overlapping mechanisms like visceral hypersensitivity may explain some comorbidity with endometriosis, this mechanism would not explain the correlation with fibroids. IBS patients accumulate significantly higher healthcare costs and utilization and a misdiagnosis may lead to prolonged symptom burden, unnecessary GI testing, delayed gynecologic treatment, repeated provider visits, ineffective treatment plans and suboptimal patient outcomes. Even as GI guidelines promote a positive diagnosis of IBS, our findings suggest that providers should consider concurrent gynecologic conditions in female IBS patients.
Full text 2,550 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Introduction

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has been diagnosed in approximately 5%-7% of the US population, with women disproportionately affected. Its nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms, such as bloating, abdominal discomfort, and altered bowel habits, overlap with those of gynecologic conditions like fibroids and endometriosis, increasing the risk of a missed diagnosis. While endometriosis has been linked to higher IBS prevalence, the association with fibroids remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess whether women diagnosed with IBS are more likely to carry a concurrent diagnosis of fibroids or endometriosis, to evaluate the potential for missed gynecologic diagnoses in this population.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study using data from the National Institutes of Health All of Us database to compare the prevalence of fibroids and endometriosis in women with and without a diagnosis of IBS. We identified women diagnosed with IBS (n = 11,625), fibroids (n = 15,189), and endometriosis (n = 5,508). Prevalence rates of fibroids and endometriosis were compared between those with and without IBS. Pearson chi-square tests were used to calculate odds ratios and assess statistical significance.

Results

The odds ratio for fibroids in women with IBS versus those without was 3.05 (95% CI: 2.89–3.21, P < 0.001); for endometriosis, the odds ratio was 5.30 (95% CI: 4.94–5.68, P < 0.001). Additionally, we analyzed diagnosis timing to determine whether IBS diagnosis typically precedes fibroids diagnosis and found no significant difference.

Conclusion

Our findings reveal a strong association between IBS and gynecologic conditions such as fibroids and endometriosis, raising concern for missed or delayed diagnoses in women presenting with nonspecific GI symptoms. In those with concurrent diagnoses, the data did not suggest that IBS was diagnosed more frequently before fibroids. While overlapping mechanisms like visceral hypersensitivity may explain some comorbidity with endometriosis, this mechanism would not explain the correlation with fibroids. IBS patients accumulate significantly higher healthcare costs and utilization and a misdiagnosis may lead to prolonged symptom burden, unnecessary GI testing, delayed gynecologic treatment, repeated provider visits, ineffective treatment plans and suboptimal patient outcomes. Even as GI guidelines promote a positive diagnosis of IBS, our findings suggest that providers should consider concurrent gynecologic conditions in female IBS patients.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisirritable_bowel_syndrome

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK