Efficacy of Dienogest Versus GnRH Agonists After Endometriosis Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

meta-analysis OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This meta-analysis found dienogest and GnRH agonists had comparable efficacy for postoperative pain and lesion recurrence after endometriosis surgery, though dienogest increased bleeding risk and GnRH agonists increased hot flushes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy of dienogest (DNG) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists in the management of endometriosis-related symptoms following surgical intervention, their related adverse effects, and lesion recurrence. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central databases, encompassing publications from January 2000 to May 2025. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials comparing postoperative medical treatment with either DNG or a GnRH agonist were systematically reviewed for inclusion. Eligible participants were women aged 18 to 45 years who underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis excision. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Data from included studies were described using mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed variables and median and range for non-normally distributed variables. Statistical analyses utilized a random-effects model to compute pooled risk ratios (RR) and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Primary outcomes assessed included pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, lesion recurrence by imaging, and incidence of adverse events. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. No significant differences were observed between the groups concerning pelvic pain and dyspareunia Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at 3 and 6 months post-surgery. DNG was associated with a significantly higher risk of vaginal bleeding (RR 4.16, CI 1,98-8.75), and a lower incidence of hot flushes (RR 0.33, CI 0.11-0.98). No other adverse events demonstrated significant inter-group differences. Lesion recurrence at 6 months assessed by postoperative imaging was not statistically different between groups (RR 0.62, CI 0.23-1.70). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows that DNG and GnRH agonists demonstrate comparable efficacy in postoperative pain management and lesion recurrence after laparoscopic endometriosis excision. These findings, however, should be interpreted with caution due to the high risk of bias of the included studies. DNG appears to be more frequently associated with vaginal bleeding, whereas GnRH agonists are more often linked to hot flushes.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Outcome instruments

VAS-pain

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_paindysmenorrheadyspareunia

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-19T06:14:56.452680+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-06-19T06:11:02.908133+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine