Global epistasis in ecosystems arises from resource constraints

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Global epistasis refers to the observation that the effect of a mutation or modification depends on the state of a biological system, not its detailed composition. Such patterns have been reported across biological scales, from proteins to organisms and ecosystems. In its simplest form, global epistasis appears as a linear relationship between the change in function or fitness due to a perturbation, and the background level of function or fitness. The mechanistic basis of global epistasis, particularly in ecological systems, remains unresolved. Here, we propose that in microbial communities, global epistasis describing the impact of adding a species to a community on function arises generically from constraints imposed by shared resource pools. We illustrate this mechanism in a single-species system growing on multiple substitutable resources, where global epistasis follows directly from nutrient limitation by an essential non-substitutable resource. We then extend this framework to multi-species communities competing for a single resource and show that the marginal effect of adding a species depends linearly on background community function, with a slope determined by the fraction of the resource claimed by the added species. We show that global epistasis persists in trophic cascades, but that facilitation and niche partitioning qualitatively break the linear dependence. This study provides a simple explanation for the appearance of global epistasis in ecosystems, and suggests that global epistasis should be a null expectation in ecosystems governed by competition. Our results propose that coupling between perturbations and shared resource pools might also help explain global epistasis at the organismal level.
Full text 1,827 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Global epistasis refers to the observation that the effect of a mutation or modification depends on the state of a biological system, not its detailed composition. Such patterns have been reported across biological scales, from proteins to organisms and ecosystems. In its simplest form, global epistasis appears as a linear relationship between the change in function or fitness due to a perturbation, and the background level of function or fitness. The mechanistic basis of global epistasis, particularly in ecological systems, remains unresolved. Here, we propose that in microbial communities, global epistasis describing the impact of adding a species to a community on function arises generically from constraints imposed by shared resource pools. We illustrate this mechanism in a single-species system growing on multiple substitutable resources, where global epistasis follows directly from nutrient limitation by an essential non-substitutable resource. We then extend this framework to multi-species communities competing for a single resource and show that the marginal effect of adding a species depends linearly on background community function, with a slope determined by the fraction of the resource claimed by the added species. We show that global epistasis persists in trophic cascades, but that facilitation and niche partitioning qualitatively break the linear dependence. This study provides a simple explanation for the appearance of global epistasis in ecosystems, and suggests that global epistasis should be a null expectation in ecosystems governed by competition. Our results propose that coupling between perturbations and shared resource pools might also help explain global epistasis at the organismal level. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00