“Be explicit to be educated ”: Using thematic analysis and co-design to investigate and understand sexuality education in Australian high schools

“Be explicit to be educated ”: Using thematic analysis and co-design to investigate and understand sexuality education in Australian high schools | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article “Be explicit to be educated ”: Using thematic analysis and co-design to investigate and understand sexuality education in Australian high schools Ava Medley, Emmalee A Ford, Shaila Dube, Sophie Maric, Sam Muller, and 7 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6606642/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 06 Mar, 2026 Read the published version in Reproductive Health → Version 1 posted 13 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background A comprehensive sexuality education is evidenced to provide youth with the skills and knowledge required to promote sexual and reproductive health. Comprehensive sexuality education is recommended globally as an effective intervention for a range of improved sexual health outcomes, including reducing sexually transmitted infections and teenage pregnancies. The Australian curriculum unsuccessfully attempts to provide a comprehensive sexuality education to Australian adolescents; observably, it is incohesive, with the relevance and delivery appearing to vary among students. Simultaneously in Australia, we sustain alarmingly high rates of sexually transmitted infections in young people and an adult population with increasing reliance on assisted reproductive technologies. The diverse identities of adolescents and the changing nature of sexuality in society warrant an in depth exploration into the ideas and issues of youth in order to provide sexuality education that is reflective of the population it serves and improve sexual and reproductive health outcomes nationally. Methods Utilising qualitative research methodology, focus group transcripts of 15–18-year-old Australians were analysed to better understand what is required within sexuality education. For increased validity and interpretation of data, this project utilised a Youth Advisory Group to validate the thematic analysis. The study’s Youth Advisory Group further engaged in the co-design and development of recommendations for delivering sexuality education in Australia that reflected the thematic findings from the focus groups and their own lived experience. Results Thematic analysis revealed three prominent themes within focus group participants’ experiences; “culture of sex”, “content of sexuality education” and “sources of sexuality education beyond formal education”. The qualitative analysis revealed evidence of the complex relationship between these themes and Australia’s underperforming sexuality education. While these results were objectively undesirable, they presented guidance for the recommendations, informing the co-design conducted by the Youth Advisory Group. Conclusion The findings of this study, together with relevant literature, provide evidence for the complexities of adolescent sexual experience and of comprehensive sexuality education in the context of contemporary Australian high schools, to ultimately promote improved sexual and reproductive outcomes in Australia, now and in the future. Comprehensive sexuality education adolescents sexual and reproductive health Figures Figure 1 Plain English Summary This study investigated how young Australians experience sexuality education in schools and what can be done to make it better. Sexuality education is important because it helps young people learn about sexual health, relationships, and how to protect themselves from things like sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and unplanned pregnancies. Although Australia's national curriculum tries to cover these topics, it often falls short. The quality and content of sex education seem to vary a lot depending on the school and the teacher, and many students feel it's not meeting their needs. At the same time, STIs remain common among young Australians, and more adults are needing help to have children through medical treatments. To better understand what young people want and need from sex education, researchers talked with teens aged 15–18 in focus groups. A Youth Advisory Group also helped analy s e the results and come up with practical suggestions based on both the focus group findings and their own experiences. Three main issues came up: the way sex is viewed in society, what's actually taught in sex ed classes, and where young people learn about sex outside of school. These areas are deeply connected and highlight why Australia’s current approach isn't working well. The study provides valuable insights into how sex education can be improved in Australia by making it more relevant, inclusive, and reflective of young people's real experiences. Background In adolescence, it is crucial that sexuality education is taught to promote and encourage positive sexual wellbeing with implications for future sexual health ( 1 ). The internationally recognised best practice in sexuality education is Comprehensive Sexuality Education ( 2 ), outlined by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) as a ‘curriculum-based process of teaching and learning about the cognitive, emotional, physical and social aspects of sexuality’ ( 3 ). A defining feature of a comprehensive sexuality education is to foster an accepting, positive and respectful outlook on a range of topics that are inclusive to all, regardless of culture, religion, socio-economic factors, race, sexual orientation, or identity. This includes topics such as Relationships, Violence and Staying Safe, The Human Body and Development, Sexuality and Sexual Behaviour and Sexual and Reproductive Health. Content should be staggered to ensure that age-appropriate content is being delivered during the various stages of development, allowing knowledge to be built upon over the span of their education to increase both understanding and retention of information ( 3 ). The delivery of sexuality education is also time-sensitive in the sense that it must be delivered prior to engagement in sexual activities for appropriate knowledge, attitudes and skills to be developed and implemented ( 4 ). Globally, extensive evidence highlights a positive link between comprehensive sexuality education and improved sexual health outcomes. Such outcomes include decreased unintended pregnancies, increased condom usage, decreased sexually transmitted infections (STIs), an improved understanding of the diversity of sexuality, prevention of domestic violence, prevention of child sex abuse and reduced infertility risk behaviour ( 1 , 5 – 8 ). Current sexuality education delivery in Australia varies between schools ( 9 ). The Australian curriculum stipulates that the responsibility for sexuality education delivery implementation falls to state and territory governments ( 10 ), thus fostering the varying execution, adoption and level of enforcement of sexuality education. Furthermore, the ability of non-government schools to modify the curriculum and adopt the curriculum at their discretion exposes further potential for sexuality education to be modified in the education of some students ( 11 – 13 ). The inference of the curriculum by states with further adaptations at a school level, may be a significant factor in the inconsistent teachings of sexuality education and subsequent variation in learning outcomes among students ( 14 ). These inconsistencies are reflected by the Australian adolescent population’s’ poor attitude and limited value they place on their sexuality education ( 15 ) ( 16 ). Investigation into the range of topics covered in sexuality education identified that there is a lack of coverage of specific topics, including safe sex for non-heteronormative couples, anal sex and having sex with someone who has a disability, suggesting the need for more inclusive topics and sexuality education “that is engaging, delivered more often, and covering a wide range of age-appropriate content” ( 15 ). It is therefore prudent to investigate why sexuality education is not meeting the expectations of adolescents to inform potential solutions and subsequently improve the programs and their relevance. The implementation of contemporary sexuality education, with the opportunity for regular appraisal and refinement, would serve to mitigate concerns raised by the adolescent community regarding its relevance, particularly within a rapidly changing society. The disordered execution of sexuality education in Australia is manifesting as alarmingly high sexually transmitted infection rates and less than desirable national reproductive outcomes. 69% of Chlamydia infections, 48% of Gonorrhoea and 31% of Syphilis infections are reported in those aged 15–29 years of age ( 17 ). These STI notification rates uncreased by 17% for Chlamydia, 79% for Gonorrhoea and 95% for Syphilis between 2015–2019 ( 18 ). Furthermore, The 7th National Survey of Secondary Students and Sexual Health identified that 60.6% of Year 10, 11 and 12 students reported that they were sexually active and of those who are sexually active, only 34.1% “always use a condom” ( 16 ). In conjunction with these statistics, Australia’s high rates of subfertility are reflected in the large reliance on assisted reproductive technology (ART) for conception; 100,039 ART treatment cycles were initiated in Australia in 2022 ( 19 ). Modifiable factors contributing to infertility include STI contraction, age, delayed child-bearing, and lifestyle factors ( 20 , 21 ). Increasing fertility knowledge therefore has power to reduce preventable infertility through encouraging protective behaviours ( 20 – 22 ). Despite both STI prevention and fertility education being recommended in comprehensive sexuality education, with significant existing evidence that the inclusion of these topics reduces these negative consequences ( 3 , 4 ), the outcomes being achieved nationally suggest large gaps in STI prevention and awareness of reproductive issues ( 15 , 16 ) ( 23 ). The inclusion of youth within a community-academic partnership is known to improve the contextuality of the content delivered, optimising engagement, as programs are representative of the experiences of the target audience ( 2 , 24 , 25 ). Without partnership of adolescents in the development of relevant educational programs, the level of participation and change in attitudes relies on the knowledge and assumptions of the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) ( 26 ). ACARA disclose consultation with “authorities, parent bodies, professional education associations, academics and business, industry and community groups” but fail to report any consultation with consumers; Australian students ( 26 ).Specifically, sexual health delivery in schools is more successful when it encourages input from the learners ( 3 , 4 , 27 ). Thus, within this study we aimed to investigate the needs and wants of Australia’s adolescents within sexuality education to allow for better representation of and inclusion of youth issues. The study also serves to address the gross lack of consultation with youth for programs fit to educate them by working collaboratively with consumers to develop recommendations for school-based sexuality education. Ultimately, with improved understanding and consultation with Australian youth, national sexual health education is optimised to prevent negative health outcomes and promote sexual and reproductive wellbeing. Methods Ethical approval for the focus groups was obtained in the original survey (23), through the University of Newcastle’s Human Research Ethics Committee, under the protocol number H-2020-0018 . Participants were previously recruited in a study surveying reproductive and sexual health knowledge (23). Participants were aged between 15-18 years old and attended or completed most of their secondary schooling in an Australian high school. This age group was selected under the assumption that Australian students should have been exposed to multiple sexuality education topics by this age, as per the Australian Curriculum (28) and are mature enough to reflect on this topic. At the survey's completion (23), participants could self-nominate to participate in focus groups for further investigation. Additional demographic data aligning with the Australian Bureau of Statistics sociodemographic factors was collected during the survey. Demographic data of the sample group can be found in Table 1. A total of 24 participants, over nine sessions (2-6 participants per session) engaged for up to 90 minutes with at least one researcher facilitating the sessions. The primary facilitator (EF) who conducted these focus sessions as part of an adjacent study did not complete the analysis in this study. The questions the facilitator asked aimed to explore the participants' opinions about their sexual health education, knowledge, opinions and suggestions (Appendix 1). It remained a priority within these focus group sessions not to ask leading questions to collect unbiased responses. All transcripts obtained from the focus group sessions were de-identified and transcribed verbatim. The participants additionally had the opportunity to confirm, review or withdraw their contributions following a review of their session's transcripts. These files were then uploaded to NVivo 14 software (Lumivero, Version 14) to complete the thematic analysis. Nvivo software was used to systematically organise and code the data, enabling the identification of themes and subthemes within the dataset. The method of thematic analysis used was that of the Braun and Clarke Reflexive Thematic Analysis Model. To meet the analysis aims within this study, a constructionist epistemology was adopted, recognising the importance of recurring themes but understanding this doesn't equate salience within a theme (29). Furthermore, following recommendations by the Reflexive Thematic Analysis model, an experimental orientation to data interpretation was used when ascribing the meaningfulness of responses given by participants, viewing responses as a direct reflection of the personal states held by the participant (Braun & Clarke, 2012). This reduced the likelihood of inferences to be made about the participants attitudes and opinions by choosing to ignore the potential social context and construct systems of meaning which offer interpretations rather than explicit communications by the participant. Table 1. Demographic data of members of the focus groups. Total of 24 participants. Demographic category n % Age 15 16 17 18 6 2 11 5 25% 8% 46% 21% State/Territory New South Wales Victoria South Australia Western Australia Queensland Northern Territory 11 5 4 2 1 1 46% 21% 17% 8% 4% 4% Identify as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander Yes No 1 23 4% 96% Born overseas Yes No 5 19 21% 79% Speak a language other than English at home Yes No 4 20 17% 83% Gender Man Woman Non-binary Agender 3 18 2 1 13% 75% 8% 4% Sexuality Heterosexual Bisexual Asexual Don’t know Prefer not to say 9 9 2 3 1 38% 38% 8% 13% 4% Gender incongruent to sex at birth Yes No 4 20 17% 83% Study’s Youth Advisory Group Ethical approval for the focus groups was obtained in the original survey through the University of Newcastle’s Human Research Ethics Committee, under the protocol number H-2020-0301. Members of the Youth Advisory Group were voluntarily recruited via word-of-mouth and physical flyers. The eligibility criteria included that participants were between 18-23 years old and were comfortable discussing issues pertaining to sexuality and reproduction. Additionally, participants ’ had to have completed the majority of their schooling in Australia. Demographic data of the study’s advisory group was recorded in a survey (Table 2). Each meeting with the advisory group was held virtually and was approximately one hour long, conducted on a monthly basis. The members were renumerated $40 AUD per hour for their time in line with NSW Health consumer remuneration guidelines (30). Prior to each meeting, a meeting agenda was disseminated for members to begin formulating ideas for discussion. The session agenda was dependent on the stage of research the project had achieved but was significantly guided by the desires of members and what they felt was an important topic for discussion. The advisory group members were considered co-researchers, their input was deemed as valuable as any another researcher, and their own individual lived experience recognises them as specifically informed about the topic. Table 2. Demographic data of members of the youth advisory group. Total of 4 participants. Demographic Category n Age 20 21 22 23 1 0 2 1 State/Territory New South Wales Australia Capital Territory 3 1 Identify as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander Yes No 0 4 Born overseas Yes No 2 2 Speak a language other than English at home Yes No 2 2 Gender Woman Non-binary 3 1 Sexuality Heterosexual Asexual biromantic 3 1 Gender incongruent to sex assigned at birth Yes No 1 3 Through the methodology of co-design (31), an iterative cycle of reflection, data collection and action was enacted as shown in Figure 1. The cyclic methodology allowed for rigorous representative research to be conducted that was better informed by consumers. Every member attended each of the six meetings, and the sessions ranged from one to two hours in length. the group discussions on issues, suggestions and recommendations were all guided by the members' contributions and priorities. The first meeting was centered on member introductions and, establishing an understanding of the study’s goals, and building rapport. In subsequent sessions, it was important for the facilitator to guide the reiterative nature of the methodology but refrain from guiding the opinions and suggestions made by members. At the commencement of each session, participants were provided with the meeting minutes and meeting recordings to allow for reflections on the outcomes and recommendations in the final meetings. . The recommendations made for Australian high schools regarding the delivery and content of their sexual and reproductive education were informed by the thematic analysis conducted in this project in conjunction with the Youth Advisory Group. Each recommendation was contextualised by thematic analysis data, alongside recommendations by the International Technical Guidance for Comprehensive Sexuality Education (UNESCO, 2018). These recommendations were discussed as part of the meetings; the key theme(s) being discussed, paired with the corresponding Key Concept (detailed in the International Technical Guidance for Comprehensive Sexuality Education (UNESCO, 2018)). Prior to the meeting, members were asked to review the UNESCO guidance and outcomes outlined in previous meeting minutes, with the opportunity to submit initial suggestions for recommendations via a poll open field response. This allowed members to give suggestions independent of each other in the meeting to minimise confirmation bias among members. Despite the existing guidance by UNESCO for sexuality education, the recommendations developed in this research project are specific to the Australian youth population, with clear appraisal for the needs and preferences of Australian youth. For accuracy, these recommendations were reviewed by two clinicians (AD and TD) who practice reproductive medicine to ensure the correct terms and phrases were used. Results Regardless of the diverse demographics and individual experiences of participants, universal themes became apparent across the data set. Three themes and eight subthemes were identified. The three themes were: Culture of sex, Content of sexuality education, and Sources of sexual health information beyond formal education. See Appendix 2 for evidence of these themes. Theme 1: Culture of sex Subtheme 1.1: Sex being taboo Participants recognised that there is a societal perception of any conversation about sex to be taboo, stating their parents, teachers and online community are inclined to avoid conversations of sex. They additionally introduced the notion that they “ copy ” their superiors in what is believed to be acceptable within society, perpetuating the practice of ignoring such issues because they are led to believe it is something that we “ should not talk about ”. I think we copy like adults and what they see is like acceptable and what they think is like okay to talk about and so like from that young age you see like your teachers don't want to talk about it. Your parents don't want to talk about it, people on the internet that you found on YouTube are a little bit awkward about talking about it too. Um it kind of just gives this idea that like it's not something that you should talk about (Female, 17, Bisexual) The shame around discussing sex broadly, was also relevant when discussing health issues resulting from sex, such as sexually transmitted infections. Infections and diseases they’re definitely like this massive taboo like if you have one just don't say anything, and don't talk about them and they don't exist (Female, 17, Bisexual) Subtheme 1.2: General poor sex culture Participants raised issues about the lack of consideration for the consequences of sex, particularly from males engaging in heteronormative sex. Among males, the gratification from others for engaging in sexual acts was discussed as being more important than the potential consequences that eventuate from sex. However, the same sexual acts and behaviours of females were detested and substantiated grounds for ‘slut-shaming’ despite the individual being subject to the same peer pressure. So I'm gonna have sex, don't care about the consequences because in the end, If I knock someone up I can leave. That that's their mentality. It's a lot of peer pressure, it's kind of that societal expectation to, again, guy sleeps with girl, guy gets, you know, a high five from his friends. Girls sleeps with guy, girl gets slut-shamed (Female, 17) This discrepancy in how different genders are viewed differently for the same behaviours was not only observed within focus group discussions, but was identified as a wider ideology that youth are keenly aware of. This phenomenon was epitomised by a male participant who used the term “ misogynistic ” to describe fellow male classmates. As boys we have a tendency to have, to be honest, a sort of misogynistic, very old, poor, I don’t know, behaviour (Male, 15, Heterosexual) Theme 2: Content of sexuality education Subtheme 2.1: Motives of sex for youth Youth reported that the understanding that youth are unlikely to be engaging in sexual acts for reproduction was not addressed in sexuality education. Participants expressed a desire for content angled towards the various contexts for engaging in sex through multiple expressions of curiosity towards sex for pleasure and intimacy, rather than for procreation. But I also think sex education really only teaches people what having sex is not how to have sex, because I feel like really just saying like a penis can go in a vagina that's, that's not the only way to have sex and also how to have pleasurable sex like not for reproduction. I feel like it's something that's not talked about, which people who are younger, are probably not doing it for reproduction (Nonbinary, 17, preferred not to state sexuality,) The whole idea of sex in terms of sex ed is for procreation rather than anyone's pleasure and being intimate with a partner, and the positives of that can generate, that idea - definitely not touched on (Female, 17, Bisexual) Subtheme 2.2: Lack of fertility content When reviewing focus group transcripts, it was evident that the convention in which school-based sexuality education addresses fertility falls short of participant expectations. Fertility content, or lack thereof, was described as “ never ” being taught to participants in their high school sexuality education, prioritising fearmongering to encourage abstinence. I have never been taught anything to do with fertility, because if they are to teach anything in sex ed it’s more just trying to scare us into not doing it since it is basically not teaching us anything about fertility because that will kind of like, they think it's encouraging us (Female, 15, Bisexual) With anticipation of their future parenting intentions, participants admitted to being concerned about infertility when progressing into adulthood. Yeah, we never touched on infertility at all or anything in regards to that which is something that I worry about personally like going into like my adult life (Female, 17, Bisexual) Subtheme 2.3: Lack of LGBTQIA + inclusive content Inclusive LGBTQIA + content was also overlooked in sexuality education of participants. Specifically, participants expressed curiosity about non-heteronormative forms of sexual interactions. However, this curiosity was often seemingly met with teachers who were either not knowledgeable in such topics or were reluctant to address them. Our male teacher didn't know pretty much anything about the female system or how to have like sex with it and so when I asked how two women could do it or how two men, he had no idea (Nonbinary, 17) This approach to sexuality education where female-with-male sexual interaction is exclusively taught, not only fails to address alternative mechanics of sex but additionally denies crucial safe sex information to students in non-heteronormative relationships. This naiveté leaves students vulnerable to sexually transmitted infections. We basically just got taught the examples of sex basically we only got taught just you know just, male and female. And then contraception just, yeah just, you got a male, female, like, um, yeah I didn't know about that whole, you know, how you’d have to use it for two men (Male, 18, Heterosexual) Subtheme 2.4: Sexually transmitted infection content Participants reported semantic understanding of sexually transmitted infections through their sexuality education but recognised a lack of deeper comprehension of the topic. Interestingly, participants repeatedly used rhetorical language, suggesting attempts to draw attention to their lack of understanding. I know what all the STIs are? Goodness no, like, do I understand them all? No, of course not. And the fact that they spread over so many, but didn't go into them in as much detail (Female, 16, Bisexual) This disconnect is further affirmed through the quote and question, by another participant. The manner in which participants articulate their experiences regarding this aspect of sexuality education is repeatedly positioned to persuade the focus group moderator of their lack of understanding and demonstrate their lack of depth in content. Chlamydia. of course, I know what I know what the word is, I don't really know what it is. I know it's an STI. Right? (Female, 17, did not yet know sexuality) Subtheme 2.5: Vague and inexplicit content The vague nature of sexuality education persisted across key learning areas, with content being taught superficially and without clear purpose. Multiple participant recounts described the method of teaching consent to be inadequate whereby schools utilised an analogy of offering someone a cup of tea when educating about sexual consent. I'm sure you've heard of it, the tea video for consent. And I feel like it's kind of it's kind of backwards, it defeats the purpose in my opinion because we have to be explicit to be educated. (Female, 16, Heterosexual) The maturity of participants was reflected through the recognition that using analogies of “ forcing tea down someone’s throat ” for something that has serious consequences is inappropriate and reduces the severity of an act of sexual assault. Generally, participants expressed a dissatisfaction with the avoidance of explicit discussion around sexuality education topics and their frustration with the use of far-stretched metaphors. The tea video like people don't want an analogy of like don't force it down to someone’s throat. No don't force somebody to have sex if they don't want to wait. We're like unintentionally glossing things over and in that sense we’re lessening the idea of the consequence, like, okay, forcing tea down someone's throat you're going to burn your throat but or forcing someone to have sex you could give them an STI. You couldn't leave them with permanent trauma, you can leave them with a child. (Female, 17) Theme 3: Sources of sexual health information beyond formal education Subtheme 3.1: Impact of digital media on sexuality understanding Participants discussed the plethora of media platforms accessible to youth, from which may glorify sex and sexual issues. Consequences of such consumption, whereby youth idolise content, was spoken about with particular concern regarding the romanticisation of sexual assault and abuse in an environment that doesn't “ have adequate consent education within schools ”. So I think a lot of the media like that, whether it be made movies, TV, pornography, whatever. A lot of the time they glorify and romanticise borderline assault and abuse and when we don't have adequate consent education within schools already, we can't see that when we're consuming it we consume it and idolise it (Female, 17) The reality of the media being where youth consume sexual content further highlights the potential for unhealthy expectations for sexual interactions. Obviously the media is a big portrayal even in movies that's where you first come across a lot of like interactions. And then the idea of consent is obviously not the core of a lot of these movies (Female, 17, Bisexual) And then people get very misinformed ideas when they consuming pornography and the way that relationships should work in terms of that I've seen people's ideas and things like that, and how skewed they are from reality type of thing, because of that, just not being able to separate that and, like, that's fiction, from like the real world type of thing (Female, 17, Bisexual) Subtheme 3.2: Sexual health misinformation When accessing sources of sexuality education, the legitimacy and accuracy of the source was questioned by participants. The “ grey area ” which is introduced when accessing sexual and reproductive health information online, is established when participants require additional information but are met with the chaotic counsel of the internet. Yeah, and the internet is also a very dangerous place in terms of talking about sexual stuff, because you don't know who the age of the person is who you're talking to, the validity of the article you're looking at. Even if the source, you have is serious or satire, you never know, like, it's a complete grey area (Agender, 17, Bisexual) Recommendations for sexuality education Recommendations for Australian sexuality education were co-designed with the Youth Advisory Group (Table 3 ). The recommendations were made in consideration of the results from the Thematic Analysis, each member's lived experience as a young person experiencing Australia’s sexuality education and elements from UNESCO’s International Technical Guidance for Sexuality Education ( 3 ). Additionally, these recommendations were reviewed by reproductive clinicians to ensure accuracy and clinical relevance. Table 3 Co-designed recommendations made with the Youth Advisory Group for Australian high schools when delivering sexuality education. Related Theme Recommendation General Recommendations • Ensure that sexuality education is taught consistently across all grade levels, covering age-appropriate content that aligns with current research and changing social environments. • Create platforms and safe spaces within schools for students to ask questions without fear of judgement or misinformation. • Promote training programs for educators to ensure they have access to up-to-date resources and information to effectively and confidently teach sexuality education. Culture of Sex • Address how societal and gender norms, peer pressure and expectations impact individual attitudes and behaviour. Sources of Sexuality Education beyond Formal Education • Educate students on the fictional portrayals of sexuality (including relationships, fertility, consent, STIs) within mass media and society, and how this is potentially harmful and misleading. • Develop critical thinking skills on how to evaluate the credibility and reliability of media sources providing sexual and reproductive health information. • Promote active involvement and support for parents, guardians, and community members in their children's sexuality education by providing resources, guidance, and opportunities for engagement. Content of Sexuality Education • Implement direct scenarios and explanations to describe sexual acts and consent, replacing vague language and euphemisms, to reduce uncertainty and convey consequences of non-consensual consent (e.g. trauma, STIs and unintended pregnancy) and the legal repercussions of such acts. • Explore current research regarding adolescent sexual behaviour, emphasising that many young people engage in sexual activities for a variety of reasons (e.g. pleasure, intimacy and self-exploration) other than for reproduction. • Incorporate and explore all genders and sexualities to expand understanding of LGBTQIA+. Use inclusive, non-gender specific terms when describing sexual intercourse, pleasure, contraception, sexual partners and consent. • Provide comprehensive education on all STIs, inclusive of all identities. Discuss prevalence, prevention and treatment relevant to current Australian statistics. • Provide comprehensive education on reproduction and fertility, and the role of contraceptives and their effective use. Consider factors that affect fertility in all genders and the limitations of reproduction. Discuss prevalence, prevention and treatment of reproductive issues and pathologies to include tubal and unexplained infertility, polycystic ovarian syndrome, PCOS, and endometriosis. Discussion In this study, a thematic analysis of focus group transcripts of Australian high school students was conducted to explore ideas and issues within their sexuality education. Our analysis revealed three prominent themes: “culture of sex”, “content of sexuality education” and “sources of sexuality education beyond formal education”. These themes maintain a dynamic relationship with one another, each independently influencing an adolescent's individual sexuality education experience and their understanding, illustrating evidence of a larger issue within society. Through the identification of this thematic data, informed, context-relevant recommendations developed with a Youth Advisory Group, emerged. The following discussion will attempt to explore these themes in parallel and as a fluid issue to understand the complexity of sexuality education in Australia, substantiating recommendations made. This study identified a pivotal discourse regarding the culture of sex, underpinned by sex as a taboo topic, modelled by those in positions of power. Despite the introduction of basic sexual health education in Australia prior to the Second World War in response to the perceived threat of sexually transmitted diseases, it was masked in conservative values ( 32 ), giving support to the idea that ‘secrecy and indecency are necessary associates of sex’ ( 32 ). Despite now being able to reflect on such naivety towards sexuality education, the results from this study suggest this outlook prevails in K-12 educational institutions today. It appears the need for improvement of sex education is influenced by a society in which conversations about sex are still being avoided and adolescents are considered to need “protecting” from the realities of sex, maintaining this cultural norm of sexual ignorance being equated with sexual innocence ( 33 ). This emphasis on “safety” and protecting adolescence from the risk of sex ( 34 ), is clear within the sexuality education experience of this study’s participants. This study highlights the asymmetry and irony within this idea, whereby those who would naturally be considered immature, young people, are more inclined to seek out understanding about a mature subject than mature community themselves. Through youth challenging the assumption that they will simply acquire an understanding of sexuality and reproductive issues within a nation’s habitual culture of ignorance and taboo, poses a defiant, contradictory stance on this culture. It is only through shifting the lens of sex to be something normal and developmental that we can begin to break down this enduring negative attitude towards sexuality education ( 35 ). Within this study, the justification for engaging in sex due to peer pressure, and the use of normalisation of sex to motivate others to also engage in sexual activities was observed. Both the perceived and experienced societal expectations to engage in sexual acts was sustained by youth, situating this study’s findings into the larger paradigm of the negative culture of sex. Within the literature, peer pressure has been identified as the “social influence of peers on an individual to conform to a particular way of acting or thinking” ( 36 ). Youth within this study contribute further evidence to this hypothesis; peers encouraging the dismissal of personal values to participate in the culturally accepted sexual behaviours other peers engage in. This practice was particularly strong within males engaging in heteronormative sex, contributing to normalisation of attitudes of misogynistic nature. Interestingly, misogyny was another key discourse within Australia’s enduring negative sex culture ( 37 ) that the youth in this study identified. Most alarmingly, males within this study admitted understanding the existence of this rudimentary culture, yet expressed no inclination to change their views, emphasising the power of Australia’s culture in modelling the norms adopted by our youth. This study’s recommendations sought to consider the impact of this culture on sexuality education, and consequently, multiple recommendations were developed to provide a more balanced view on sex liberated from misogyny and gender expectations. For a cultural shift to occur, it is necessary for youth to engage in their sexual and reproductive health education to develop the knowledge and skills of this educational content. This study revealed that this is dependent on both the ability of youth to relate to the content being taught, and, whether the content captures a comprehensive range of issues. The disconnect between one’s own sexual endeavours and what is being taught within sexuality education appears to be due partly to the inability of participants to associate with content that does not relate to the sexual practices and opinions held by youth themselves. There was a clear consensus that youth are not engaged in sex for reproduction, instead they engage for pleasure, yet their education disregards this motivation. The recommendation made with the advisory group, naturally, was to include these various motivations for sex. This study's findings align with international discourse of inclusion of pleasure for all individuals within sexuality education ( 38 , 39 ). The irrelevance youth perceive in their sexuality education is made worse through disparities and inadequacy in fertility education. Knowledge of fertility issues and content remains low in Australian adolescents ( 23 ), which, paired with this study reporting on the lack of fertility content within the Australian curriculum, is unsurprising ( 40 ). Logically this has led to a strong emphasis on improving fertility education with Australia ( 41 , 42 ). Yet it seems the Australian curriculum remains rooted in values of pregnancy prevention, with a clear priority to reduce teen pregnancy rates atop reproductive health ( 23 ). However paramount as reducing teen pregnancy may be, within the context of Australian teens this issue is of minor significance when adjacent to the prevalence of teenage mothers which has more than halved since 2011, representing only 1.5% of all mothers ( 43 ). It could be concluded that the conservative values of Australia’s past ( 32 ), as previously discussed, hold true with intimidation tactics that are overly concerned with “protecting” adolescents from the realities of sex. The prominent subtheme, lack of fertility content, that arose in the thematic analysis could be attributed to the original survey's ( 23 ) purpose to investigate fertility knowledge and thus influence the topic of fertility arising within focus groups. However, while the topic may have been introduced by the researcher, it does not influence the experience discussed by the students. The consequential interpretation of this theme and its salience could be argued, however within this study the Youth Advisory Group reduced this bias through consumer validation and recognised that fertility is a significant issue in Australia’s sexuality education. Inclusive sexuality education has long been sought after in Australia and this aspiration was voiced within this study, contributing to the consensus that Australia’s sexuality education is not considered inclusive of diverse genders and sexualities. Alongside the extensive dialogue and petition by the focus group participants, the study’s Youth Advisory Group felt it appropriate to explicitly incorporate inclusive language and LGBTQIA + recommendations made to Australian high schools. With 11% of Australians under the age of 25 identifying as LGBTQIA+, this is expected ( 44 ). However, the proclivity of current sexuality education to focus on solely reproductive, heteronormative, penetrative sex, over-exemplifies one instance of sexual activity and fails to address the plethora of sexual experiences and activities of a wide range of individuals beyond cis men and women ( 45 ). This ignorance for inclusion furthers unfamiliarity with key contraceptive and disease prevention information for those in non-heteronormative relationships, shaping inequitable opportunity for sexual health in youth. The desire for explicit inclusive LGBTQIA + content has repeatedly been met with dispute from religious and political groups concerned with content to be “undermining” traditional gender roles ( 46 ). As the curriculum reflects Australian political and social beliefs ( 47 ) either our society as a whole does not value inclusivity, which the study’s participants reject through focus group discussions, or the curriculum remains overly concerned with pacifying opposing educational values through ambiguity. The political convenience in remaining enigmatic shifts the onus to schools and teachers to tailor sexuality education to a diverse group of students ( 47 ). Educators dictating as to whether this occurs based upon their own motivation, leaves many adolescents without appropriate sexuality education, as was discerned within this study. In contrast to the minimal or lack of coverage in fertility and LGBTQIA + topics, the depth and transparency of sexually transmitted infection content was the primary concern for participants. This sentiment was shared among other Australian students, who reported that STI content was taught superficially ( 9 , 48 ). Up-to-date, comprehensive sexually transmitted infection education was thus another direct recommendation that emerged from this study. The large number of young people being diagnosed with preventable sexually transmitted diseases emphasises a clear lack of understanding of the transmission and awareness of STIs. In 2022, Australian 15–29-year-olds represented 69% of Chlamydia cases, 48% of Gonorrhoea cases and 31% of Syphilis cases ( 49 ). The overarching poor culture of sex within Australia and the direct hesitancy for a sex-positive education to be taught to Australia’s adolescents has been established as problematic within this study. Thus, it would not be presumptuous to assume that this lack of depth within STI content is a by-product of the taboo Australia holds for adolescent sex. Complementing this, without a broad range of contexts and scenarios considered when educating on sexually transmitted infections, a level of uncertainty regarding who the content is relevant to remains; particularly in non-heteronormative relationships ( 48 ). Independently, poor STI education manifests in broad, universal STI rates in adolescents. However, when paired alongside shortfalls in LGBTQIA + content, it could explain why gay and bisexual men are disproportionately overrepresented in STI rates ( 49 ). The inclusion of LGBTQIA + STI content presents a potential opportunity for both the depth of this content to be strengthened and the previous issue of diversity within sexuality education to be better addressed. This study’s findings indicate that some topics and concepts were not taught directly or with explicit language but rather with the use of analogies. For example, the use of “the tea video” ( 50 ) was discussed as a vessel for educating adolescents on consent education in this study. It is established that the use of analogies is not uncommon in education and can be a useful tool in increasing comprehension through well-constructed comparison ( 51 ). However, in the context of sexual health education, the juxtaposition of using the analogy of forcing someone to drink a cup of tea to explain sexual assault is not a well-constructed nor appropriate comparison. Optimistically, the tea video does allow for and encourage more nuanced discussion within the classroom and is potentially a great tool to introduce the concept of consent ( 52 ). Nevertheless, Australian youth find the context in which this video has been used, either independently or in an environment where there may be varying levels of understanding of consent, to be inadequate. Hence, a clear recommendation that specifically encouraged the dismissal of “vague language and euphemisms” within school-based sexuality education was endorsed by the Youth Advisory Group. Given this study’s position alongside the extensive literature, it is justified to affirm Australia’s sexuality education as insufficient according to youth. As this study further explored, an educational system that does not satisfy the standard for sexuality education, whether this be due to its lack of relevance or comprehensiveness, leaves adolescents to rely on alternate forms of information to source sexuality education. The influential potential of these informal sources of information on sex and sexuality understanding was regarded as substantive and contributed to young people being misinformed about sex and relationships and to adopt false perceptions of real-life sexual experiences. The unrealistic portrayal of sex and relationships in the media admittedly concerns youth, with worries that widely idolised stereotypes will continue, in alignment with existing literature ( 53 ). The ability of adolescents to consume unhealthy portrayals of sex and relationships without a critically informed consciousness was brought forth given the familiar propensity for media to make sexual innuendos and imply sexual meaning. Whether consciously or subconsciously, it is understood that young adults will consume media as they progress to adulthood, and that this can have a key influence on their sexual socialisation ( 54 ). Generalisations made by participants regarding permissive sexual attitudes and the influence of media on their peers’ experiences align with published literature that positively associates social media use with these attitudes ( 55 ). This study did not attribute these unrealistic expectations with conscious media consumption, but rather highlighted the risks associated with the limited sexuality education and exposure to such content. Beyond media having the potential to influence adolescent ideas and attitudes, this study found other external sources of sexuality education to misinform youth. The current need to assess whether a source is accurate has been identified within Australian youth previously, which reported young people being required to distinguish factual sexual health knowledge from opinion or experience ( 56 ). The promotion of critical thinking skills in the context of sexuality education in media was for this reason, recommended within this study. Despite this uncertainty in youth when accessing sources of sexuality education, there is obvious potential for the internet to offer sexual and reproductive health information with its ease of access ( 57 ). Thus, to improve the ability of young people’s understanding of what an appropriate source of information is, would reduce the propagation of inaccurate ideas and false “facts” about sexuality and offer opportunity to strengthen one’s ability to critically consume sexuality information. Considering the inequities of access and exposure to appropriate sexuality content in school settings identified in this study, resources outside of formal education become essential to some youth when exploring this content. The capacity of such accessible sources to inform youth could compliment school-based education to strengthen understanding or alternatively provide a safe source of information for those in sheltered settings. Study limitations The use of focus group data that was collected by another researcher may have introduced the opportunity for bias. Researchers can introduce their own interpretation bias when collecting and analysing data, thus two sets of researcher bias may have influenced the data set used; one during data collection, one during analysis. However, due to the focus groups being conducted prior to this study it consequently reduced the likelihood of leading questions relative to this study’s outcomes to be asked as this study’s research question was not considered. This is not the case for the subtheme of fertility related content that arose, as this discussion point could be attributed the original study’s research question. Nevertheless, the use of an advisory group within this study that validated thematic analysis significantly reduced this bias. It is a limitation when using focus groups that the participants may not represent an accurate diversity of the population. The focus group participants within this study were reflective of the broader Australian population in terms of sexuality, age, language spoken at home, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status and location. However, the focus group participant population did not reflect the gender proportions within the Australian population. The inclusion of only four male participants to contribute to the thematic analysis reduces the representation of male ideas and values. Additionally, the small sample size of participants in the focus group population limits the ideas and experiences that are collected. A small sample bias increases the likelihood for incorrect assumptions to be concluded and disrupt a studies validity ( 58 ). This may contribute to the saturation of ideas however, the introduction of the Youth Advisory Group, a separate subgroup of Australian youth, reduces the likelihood for sample group biases as they independently validated the ideas of the focus groups. A further limitation of this study was the lack of diverse demographic representation of those who engaged in the co-design process; in this study, the Youth Advisory Group. As the Group had a total of four members, an accurate representation of the Australian youth population could not be achieved without the recruitment of additional members, highlighting recruitment challenges and consequent limitations. Specifically, we did not have any male participants to provide guidance and contribute to the recommendations for Australian high schools when delivering sexuality education. Arguably, despite the unbalanced spread of consumers, it is still favourable to have members of the youth community contribute to this study rather than none. To mitigate this in future investigations or recommendations, the opportunity to refine and validate these findings with a more diverse group is suggested. Conclusion Australia’s current sexuality education needs reform and refinement to ensure it is relevant to the wants and needs of its current youth population. This project aimed to provide insight into perceptions of youth about their sexuality education and to co-design recommendations to improve sexuality education. The study revealed that youth consider the prevailing attitudes towards sex, the quality and content of sexuality education offered at schools, and the influence of external sources like social media, the internet and peers as significant issues in their school-based education. Despite these themes capturing primarily negative experiences, it introduced direction into advancements. Through co-designing recommendations with the Youth Advisory Group, we were able to make relevant, unambiguous recommendations to refine and contextualise current sexuality education practice. This study highlights the complex dynamics influencing sexuality education in an Australian context. This contributes to an increasingly comprehensive understanding of these dynamics, essential to improve national sexual and reproductive health outcomes. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate This study was approved by University of Newcastle Human Ethics Committee under the protocol numbers H-2020-0301 and H-2020-0018. Written informed consent was obtained from study participants and from parents if the participant volunteered parental consent. Consent for publication Not applicable. Availability of data The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to identifiable participant data but are available from J.S on reasonable request. Competing interests The author’s declare no competing interests Funding This research was supported by a CSIRO grant (G2300405) and the John Hunter Hospital Charitable Trust Grant (G2300395). J.M.S is funded by a Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DECRA) fellowship (G2001133). Author contributions A.M wrote the main manuscript and conducted the analysis of the data. S.D, S.M, S.M and C.T assisted in the data analysis and development of recommendations. T.D and A.D reviewed the recommendations from a clinical perspective. E.F, T.B and J.S conducted the focus groups which gathered the data set used for analysis in this study. E.F, C.C, K.G.P were co-supervisors of this study. J.M.S was the primary supervisor of this study. All authors reviewed the manuscript. References Goldfarb ES, Lieberman LD. Three Decades of Research: The Case for Comprehensive Sex Education. J Adolesc Health. 2021;68(1):13–27. Family Planning Australia NSHiSAC. Sexuality and Sexual Health Education Best Practice Statement. 2023. UNESCO JUNPoHA, United Nations Population Fund. United Nations Children’s Fund, United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, World Health Organistaion. International technical guidance on sexual education: an evidence-informed approch2018. 138 p. UNESCO. Emerging evidence, lessons and practice in comprehensive sexuality education: a global review. 2015. Kim EJ, Park B, Kim SK, Park MJ, Lee JY, Jo AR, et al. A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Comprehensive Sexuality Education Programs on Children and Adolescents. Healthc (Basel). 2023;11:18. Maticka-Tyndale E, Tenkorang EY. A multi-level model of condom use among male and female upper primary school students in Nyanza, Kenya. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(3):616–25. Oringanje C, Meremikwu MM, Eko H, Esu E, Meremikwu A, Ehiri JE. Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2(2):Cd005215. Lim L, Hoppe M, Kennedy L, Gunderson A, Wang L, Etezadi-Amoli N. Young Adults’ Understanding of Modifiable Risk Factors of Infertility. Women's Health Rep. 2024;5(1):815–24. Ezer P, Kerr L, Fisher CM, Heywood W, Lucke J. Australian students’ experiences of sexuality education at school. Sex Educ. 2019;19(5):597–613. Australian Curriculum ACARA. AaRA. Implementation of the Australian Curriculum 2010 [. Education Act. NSW Government(1990). Government VS. About sexuality education 2023 [Available from: https://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/teachingresources/discipline/physed/Pages/about.aspx#link90 School Education Act. State of Western Australia(1999). Ezer PP, Jennifer; Jones T, Fisher. Christopher. 2nd National Survey of Australian Teachers of Sexuality Eductaion 2018. Australian Reasearch Centre in Sex, Health & Society; 2020. Fisher CW, Kerr A, Bellamy L. Rosalind; Ezer, Paulina. 6th National Survey of Australian Secondary Students and Sexual Health 2018. 2019. Power J, Kauer S, Fisher C. Chapman-Bellamy,. The 7th National Survey of Australian Secondary Students and Sexual Health. 2022. King J, McManus H, Kwon J, Gray R, McGregor S. HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia: Annual surveillance report 2023. Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney;; 2023. Australian Government DoHaAC. About sexual health 2023 [Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/topics/sexual-health/about#:~:text=about%2016%25%20of%20Australians%20have,95%25%20for%20infectious%20syphilis Newman JEKD, Paul RC, Chambers GM. Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand 2022. National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit. University of New South Wales; 2024. Rossi BV, Abusief M, Missmer SA. Modifiable Risk Factors and Infertility: What are the Connections? Am J Lifestyle Med. 2014;10(4):220–31. Sharma R, Biedenharn KR, Fedor JM, Agarwal A. Lifestyle factors and reproductive health: taking control of your fertility. Reproductive biology Endocrinol. 2013;11:1–15. Herbert DL, Lucke JC, Dobson AJ. Infertility, medical advice and treatment with fertility hormones and/or in vitro fertilisation: a population perspective from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2009;33(4):358–64. Ford EA, Chojenta C, Bagade T, Sweeney S, Sutherland JM. Fertility knowledge in a cohort of Australia’s adolescents: a cross-sectional study of reproductive and sexual health education. Sex Educ. 2023:1–19. Jacquez F, Vaughn LM, Wagner E. Youth as partners, participants or passive recipients: a review of children and adolescents in community-based participatory research (CBPR). Am J Community Psychol. 2013;51(1–2):176–89. Vanwesenbeeck I, Westeneng J, de Boer T, Reinders J, van Zorge R. Lessons learned from a decade implementing Comprehensive Sexuality Education in resource poor settings: The World Starts With Me. Sex Educ. 2016;16(5):471–86. Authority AACAR. Curriculum Development Process. 2012. Chavula MP, Zulu JM, Hurtig A-K. Factors influencing the integration of comprehensive sexuality education into educational systems in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Reproductive Health. 2022;19(1). Australian Curriculum AaRA. Australian Curriculum: Health and Physical Education Version 9.0 2022 [Available from: Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101. Health N. Consumer, carer and community member remuneration. 2023. Vargas C, Whelan J, Brimblecombe J, Allendera S. Co-creation, co-design and co-production for public health: a perspective on definitions and distinctions. Public Health Res Pract. 2022;32(2). Swain S, Warne E, Hillel M. Ignorance is not innocence: Sex education in Australia, 1890–1939. Sexual Pedagogies: Sex Education in Britain, Australia, and America, 1879–2000. Springer; 2004. pp. 33–52. Jackson S. How to make babies: Sexism in sex education. Women's Stud Int Q. 1978;1(4):341–52. Allen L. Pleasurable pedagogy’: young people's ideas about teaching ‘pleasure’ in sexuality education. Twenty-First Century Soc. 2007;2(3):249–64. Lehn EW, Chahboun S. Breaking taboos! From silence to support: understanding children’s sexuality in early childhood pedagogical practice. Front Educ. 2025;10. Dishion T, Piehler T, Myers MW. Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. 2008:72–93. Robinson KH. Reinforcing hegemonic masculinities through sexual harassment: issues of identity, power and popularity in secondary schools. Gend Educ. 2005;17(1):19–37. Alldred P. Introduction to special issue. Sex Education: Sexuality Soc Learn. 2012;12(4):375–81. Martino W, Frank B. The tyranny of surveillance: Male teachers and the policing of masculinities in a single sex school. Gend Educ. 2006;18(1):17–33. Martins MV, Koert E, Sylvest R, Maeda E, Moura-Ramos M, Hammarberg K, et al. Fertility education: recommendations for developing and implementing tools to improve fertility literacy†. Hum Reprod. 2023;39(2):293–302. Marson K. Legitimate sexpectations: The power of sex-ed. Scribe; 2022. Mitchell A, Smith A, Carman M, Schlichthorst M, Walsh J, Pitts M. Sexuality education in Australia in 2011. 2011. Health, AIo. Welfare. Australia's mothers and babies. Canberra: AIHW; 2024. Carman MF, Bourne C, Power A, Rosenberg J. S. Research Matters: How many people are LGBTIQ? La Trobe University; 2020. Kauer S, Power J, Bourne A, Fisher C. The diverse but common definitions of sex for young people in Australia. Sex Educ. 2024:1–17. Shannon B, Smith SJ. A lot more to learn than where babies come from’: Controversy, language and agenda setting in the framing of school-based sexuality education curricula in Australia. Sex Educ. 2015;15(6):641–54. Leahy D, Burrows L, McCuaig L, Wright J, Penney D. School health education in changing times: Curriculum. pedagogies and partnerships: Routledge; 2015. Waling A, Fisher C, Ezer P, Kerr L, Bellamy R, Lucke J. Please Teach Students that Sex is a Healthy Part of Growing Up: Australian Students’ Desires for Relationships and Sexuality Education. Sexuality Res Social Policy. 2021;18(4):1113–28. King J, McManus H, Kwon J, Gray R, McGregor S. HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia: Annual surveillance report 2023. Kirby Institute. UNSW Sydney: Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney; 2023. Police TV, Tea. and Consent Youtube2015 [Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZwvrxVavnQ Gray ME, Holyoak KJ. Teaching by Analogy: From Theory to Practice. Mind, Brain, and Education. 2021;15(3):250 – 63. Bragg S, Ponsford R, Meiksin R, Emmerson L, Bonell C. Dilemmas of school-based relationships and sexuality education for and about consent. Sex Educ. 2020. Ward LM. Does television exposure affect emerging adults' attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation. J Youth Adolesc. 2002;31:1–15. Zhang Y, Miller LE, Harrison K. The relationship between exposure to sexual music videos and young adults' sexual attitudes. J Broadcast Electron Media. 2008;52(3):368–86. Coyne SM, Ward LM, Kroff SL, Davis EJ, Holmgren HG, Jensen AC, et al. Contributions of Mainstream Sexual Media Exposure to Sexual Attitudes, Perceived Peer Norms, and Sexual Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64(4):430–6. Fraser S, Moore D, Waling A, Farrugia A. Making epistemic citizens: Young people and the search for reliable and credible sexual health information. Soc Sci Med. 2021;276:113817. Barak A, Fisher WA. Toward an Internet-driven, theoretically-based, innovative approach to sex education. J Sex Res. 2001;38(4):324–32. Faber J, Fonseca LM. How sample size influences research outcomes. Dent Press J Orthod. 2014;19(4):27–9. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files Appendices.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 06 Mar, 2026 Read the published version in Reproductive Health → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 26 Jun, 2025 Reviews received at journal 13 Jun, 2025 Reviews received at journal 13 Jun, 2025 Reviews received at journal 04 Jun, 2025 Reviews received at journal 03 Jun, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 28 May, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 26 May, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 26 May, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 25 May, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 23 May, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 07 May, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 07 May, 2025 First submitted to journal 06 May, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6606642","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":462137070,"identity":"6b0de5f5-c7f4-45df-8cb6-0d0cde875dbb","order_by":0,"name":"Ava Medley","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Newcastle Australia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ava","middleName":"","lastName":"Medley","suffix":""},{"id":462137071,"identity":"96ddc3c4-1da0-40b7-a356-65650cd6efa3","order_by":1,"name":"Emmalee A Ford","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Newcastle Australia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Emmalee","middleName":"A","lastName":"Ford","suffix":""},{"id":462137072,"identity":"4436a045-11c8-40c3-b628-7204803fe7d0","order_by":2,"name":"Shaila Dube","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Youth Advisory Group, University of Newcastle","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shaila","middleName":"","lastName":"Dube","suffix":""},{"id":462137073,"identity":"9b691991-f309-4434-8daf-a83c1b2e9863","order_by":3,"name":"Sophie Maric","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Youth Advisory Group, University of Newcastle","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sophie","middleName":"","lastName":"Maric","suffix":""},{"id":462137074,"identity":"5e9eb849-a830-44f3-b4be-d281738bf63c","order_by":4,"name":"Sam Muller","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Youth Advisory Group, University of Newcastle","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sam","middleName":"","lastName":"Muller","suffix":""},{"id":462137075,"identity":"074866b7-e2cc-465b-ab5f-5a9bf95df88f","order_by":5,"name":"Claire Taylor","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Youth Advisory Group, University of Newcastle","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Claire","middleName":"","lastName":"Taylor","suffix":""},{"id":462137076,"identity":"d13ce046-0e56-411c-96fa-13f06a580aca","order_by":6,"name":"Tania Day","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Newcastle Australia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tania","middleName":"","lastName":"Day","suffix":""},{"id":462137077,"identity":"1874ea7e-cbca-4e67-a5f8-538bc08a0964","order_by":7,"name":"Angela Dunford","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Newcastle Australia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Angela","middleName":"","lastName":"Dunford","suffix":""},{"id":462137078,"identity":"66196eb8-3927-4dd0-8a55-e9edd479f180","order_by":8,"name":"Tanmay Bagade","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Newcastle Australia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tanmay","middleName":"","lastName":"Bagade","suffix":""},{"id":462137079,"identity":"9ff0bcac-1710-4f95-b6d7-8c51bd3176fa","order_by":9,"name":"Catherine Chojenta","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Newcastle Australia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Catherine","middleName":"","lastName":"Chojenta","suffix":""},{"id":462137080,"identity":"9cba282e-4e3c-436d-910d-806c8fa9fb08","order_by":10,"name":"Kirsty Pringle","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Newcastle Australia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kirsty","middleName":"","lastName":"Pringle","suffix":""},{"id":462137081,"identity":"532aa782-223c-4dd3-9ab6-73ee52e11222","order_by":11,"name":"Jessie Sutherland","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Newcastle Australia","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jessie","middleName":"","lastName":"Sutherland","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-05-06 23:38:12","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6606642/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6606642/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-026-02288-y","type":"published","date":"2026-03-06T15:57:27+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":83623568,"identity":"30c8d288-cc99-40b2-a5e9-8456e5e72a87","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-29 15:56:07","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":135891,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eCo-design process utilised with the Youth Advisory Group when developing recommendations.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Picture1.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6606642/v1/eebe092c94f7ec339872f744.jpg"},{"id":104250615,"identity":"4400de95-bba9-4764-9ddd-8c39b81b5046","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-03-09 16:02:01","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":827407,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6606642/v1/80a23f7f-9232-4579-a959-e53655352c6d.pdf"},{"id":83623566,"identity":"3cb898a2-0d30-49ff-8d8d-e7db0403430b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-29 15:56:07","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":26542,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Appendices.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6606642/v1/68e6eb2d480b207e27254797.docx"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"“Be explicit to be educated ”: Using thematic analysis and co-design to investigate and understand sexuality education in Australian high schools ","fulltext":[{"header":"Plain English Summary","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study investigated how young Australians experience sexuality education in schools and what can be done to make it better. Sexuality education is important because it helps young people learn about sexual health, relationships, and how to protect themselves from things like sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and unplanned pregnancies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlthough Australia's national curriculum tries to cover these topics, it often falls short. The quality and content of sex education seem to vary a lot depending on the school and the teacher, and many students feel it's not meeting their needs. At the same time, STIs remain common among young Australians, and more adults are needing help to have children through medical treatments.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo better understand what young people want and need from sex education, researchers talked with teens aged 15–18 in focus groups. A Youth Advisory Group also helped analy\u003cins cite=\"mailto:Ava%20Medley\" datetime=\"2025-04-15T09:25\"\u003es\u003c/ins\u003ee the results and come up with practical suggestions based on both the focus group findings and their own experiences.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThree main issues came up: the way sex is viewed in society, what's actually taught in sex ed classes, and where young people learn about sex outside of school. These areas are deeply connected and highlight why Australia’s current approach isn't working well.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe study provides valuable insights into how sex education can be improved in Australia by making it more relevant, inclusive, and reflective of young people's real experiences.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Background","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn adolescence, it is crucial that sexuality education is taught to promote and encourage positive sexual wellbeing with implications for future sexual health (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). The internationally recognised best practice in sexuality education is Comprehensive Sexuality Education (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e), outlined by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) as a \u0026lsquo;curriculum-based process of teaching and learning about the cognitive, emotional, physical and social aspects of sexuality\u0026rsquo; (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). A defining feature of a comprehensive sexuality education is to foster an accepting, positive and respectful outlook on a range of topics that are inclusive to all, regardless of culture, religion, socio-economic factors, race, sexual orientation, or identity. This includes topics such as Relationships, Violence and Staying Safe, The Human Body and Development, Sexuality and Sexual Behaviour and Sexual and Reproductive Health. Content should be staggered to ensure that age-appropriate content is being delivered during the various stages of development, allowing knowledge to be built upon over the span of their education to increase both understanding and retention of information (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). The delivery of sexuality education is also time-sensitive in the sense that it must be delivered prior to engagement in sexual activities for appropriate knowledge, attitudes and skills to be developed and implemented (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). Globally, extensive evidence highlights a positive link between comprehensive sexuality education and improved sexual health outcomes. Such outcomes include decreased unintended pregnancies, increased condom usage, decreased sexually transmitted infections (STIs), an improved understanding of the diversity of sexuality, prevention of domestic violence, prevention of child sex abuse and reduced infertility risk behaviour (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR6 CR7\" citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCurrent sexuality education delivery in Australia varies between schools (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e). The Australian curriculum stipulates that the responsibility for sexuality education delivery implementation falls to state and territory governments (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e), thus fostering the varying execution, adoption and level of enforcement of sexuality education. Furthermore, the ability of non-government schools to modify the curriculum and adopt the curriculum at their discretion exposes further potential for sexuality education to be modified in the education of some students (\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR12\" citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e). The inference of the curriculum by states with further adaptations at a school level, may be a significant factor in the inconsistent teachings of sexuality education and subsequent variation in learning outcomes among students (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese inconsistencies are reflected by the Australian adolescent population\u0026rsquo;s\u0026rsquo; poor attitude and limited value they place on their sexuality education (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e). Investigation into the range of topics covered in sexuality education identified that there is a lack of coverage of specific topics, including safe sex for non-heteronormative couples, anal sex and having sex with someone who has a disability, suggesting the need for more inclusive topics and sexuality education \u0026ldquo;that is engaging, delivered more often, and covering a wide range of age-appropriate content\u0026rdquo; (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e). It is therefore prudent to investigate why sexuality education is not meeting the expectations of adolescents to inform potential solutions and subsequently improve the programs and their relevance. The implementation of contemporary sexuality education, with the opportunity for regular appraisal and refinement, would serve to mitigate concerns raised by the adolescent community regarding its relevance, particularly within a rapidly changing society.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe disordered execution of sexuality education in Australia is manifesting as alarmingly high sexually transmitted infection rates and less than desirable national reproductive outcomes. 69% of \u003cem\u003eChlamydia\u003c/em\u003e infections, 48% of \u003cem\u003eGonorrhoea\u003c/em\u003e and 31% of \u003cem\u003eSyphilis\u003c/em\u003e infections are reported in those aged 15\u0026ndash;29 years of age (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e). These STI notification rates uncreased by 17% for Chlamydia, 79% for Gonorrhoea and 95% for Syphilis between 2015\u0026ndash;2019 (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e). Furthermore, The 7th National Survey of Secondary Students and Sexual Health identified that 60.6% of Year 10, 11 and 12 students reported that they were sexually active and of those who are sexually active, only 34.1% \u0026ldquo;always use a condom\u0026rdquo; (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e). In conjunction with these statistics, Australia\u0026rsquo;s high rates of subfertility are reflected in the large reliance on assisted reproductive technology (ART) for conception; 100,039 ART treatment cycles were initiated in Australia in 2022 (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e). Modifiable factors contributing to infertility include STI contraction, age, delayed child-bearing, and lifestyle factors (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e). Increasing fertility knowledge therefore has power to reduce preventable infertility through encouraging protective behaviours (\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR21\" citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e). Despite both STI prevention and fertility education being recommended in comprehensive sexuality education, with significant existing evidence that the inclusion of these topics reduces these negative consequences (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e), the outcomes being achieved nationally suggest large gaps in STI prevention and awareness of reproductive issues (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe inclusion of youth within a community-academic partnership is known to improve the contextuality of the content delivered, optimising engagement, as programs are representative of the experiences of the target audience (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e). Without partnership of adolescents in the development of relevant educational programs, the level of participation and change in attitudes relies on the knowledge and assumptions of the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e). ACARA disclose consultation with \u0026ldquo;authorities, parent bodies, professional education associations, academics and business, industry and community groups\u0026rdquo; but fail to report any consultation with consumers; Australian students (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e).Specifically, sexual health delivery in schools is more successful when it encourages input from the learners (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e). Thus, within this study we aimed to investigate the needs and wants of Australia\u0026rsquo;s adolescents within sexuality education to allow for better representation of and inclusion of youth issues. The study also serves to address the gross lack of consultation with youth for programs fit to educate them by working collaboratively with consumers to develop recommendations for school-based sexuality education. Ultimately, with improved understanding and consultation with Australian youth, national sexual health education is optimised to prevent negative health outcomes and promote sexual and reproductive wellbeing.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003eEthical approval for the focus groups was obtained in the original survey (23), through the University of Newcastle\u0026rsquo;s Human Research Ethics Committee, under the protocol number H-2020-0018\u003cins cite=\"mailto:Ava%20Medley\" datetime=\"2025-04-08T10:05\"\u003e.\u003c/ins\u003e\u003cdel cite=\"mailto:Ava%20Medley\" datetime=\"2025-04-08T10:05\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/del\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eParticipants were previously recruited in a study surveying reproductive and sexual health knowledge\u0026nbsp;(23). Participants were aged between\u003cins cite=\"mailto:Ava%20Medley\" datetime=\"2025-03-31T10:05\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/ins\u003e15-18 years old and attended or completed most of their secondary schooling in an Australian high school. \u0026nbsp;This age group was selected under the assumption that Australian students should have been exposed to multiple sexuality education topics by this age, as per the Australian Curriculum (28) and are mature enough to reflect on this topic. At the survey\u0026apos;s completion (23), participants could self-nominate to participate in focus groups for further investigation.\u003cins cite=\"mailto:Ava%20Medley\" datetime=\"2025-04-08T09:08\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/ins\u003e Additional demographic data aligning with the Australian Bureau of Statistics sociodemographic factors was collected during the survey. Demographic data of the sample group can be found in Table 1.\u003cins cite=\"mailto:Ava%20Medley\" datetime=\"2025-04-01T10:05\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/ins\u003eA total of 24 participants, over nine sessions (2-6 participants per session) engaged for up to 90 minutes with at least one researcher facilitating the sessions. The primary facilitator (EF) who conducted these focus sessions as part of an adjacent study did not complete the analysis in this study. The questions the facilitator asked aimed to explore the participants\u0026apos; opinions about their sexual health education, knowledge, opinions and suggestions (Appendix 1). It remained a priority within these focus group sessions not to ask leading questions to collect unbiased responses.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll transcripts obtained from the focus group sessions were de-identified and transcribed verbatim. The participants additionally had the opportunity to confirm, review or withdraw their contributions following a review of their session\u0026apos;s transcripts. These files were then uploaded to NVivo 14 software (Lumivero, Version 14) to complete the thematic analysis. Nvivo software was used to systematically organise and code the data, enabling the identification of themes and subthemes within the dataset. The method of thematic analysis used was that of the Braun and Clarke \u003cem\u003eReflexive Thematic Analysis Model.\u003c/em\u003e To meet the analysis aims within this study, a constructionist epistemology was adopted, recognising the importance of recurring themes but understanding this doesn\u0026apos;t equate salience within a theme (29). Furthermore, following recommendations by the Reflexive Thematic Analysis model, an experimental orientation to data interpretation was used when ascribing the meaningfulness of responses given by participants, viewing responses as a direct reflection of the personal states held by the participant (Braun \u0026amp; Clarke, 2012). This reduced the likelihood of inferences to be made about the participants attitudes and opinions by choosing to ignore the potential social context and construct systems of meaning which offer interpretations rather than explicit communications by the participant.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 1. Demographic data of members of the focus groups. Total of 24 participants.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"624\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 272px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDemographic category\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 180px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003en\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 172px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 272px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAge\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 180px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 172px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e25%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e46%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e21%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 272px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eState/Territory\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNew South Wales\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVictoria\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSouth Australia\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWestern Australia\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eQueensland\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNorthern Territory\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 180px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 172px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e46%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e21%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 272px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIdentify as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 180px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 172px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e96%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 272px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBorn overseas\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 180px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 172px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e21%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e79%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 272px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSpeak a language other than English at home\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 180px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 172px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e83%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 272px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGender\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMan\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWoman\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNon-binary\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAgender\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 180px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 172px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e75%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 272px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSexuality\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHeterosexual\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBisexual\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAsexual\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDon\u0026rsquo;t know\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePrefer not to say\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 180px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 172px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e38%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e38%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 272px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGender incongruent to sex at birth\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 180px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 172px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e83%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eStudy\u0026rsquo;s Youth Advisory Group\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEthical approval for the focus groups was obtained in the original survey through the University of Newcastle\u0026rsquo;s Human Research Ethics Committee, under the protocol number H-2020-0301.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMembers of the Youth Advisory Group were voluntarily recruited via word-of-mouth and physical flyers. The eligibility criteria included that participants were between 18-23 years old and were comfortable discussing issues pertaining to sexuality and reproduction. Additionally, participants\u003cdel cite=\"mailto:[email protected]\" datetime=\"2025-04-04T03:48\"\u003e\u0026rsquo;\u003c/del\u003e had to have completed the majority of their schooling in Australia. Demographic data of the study\u0026rsquo;s advisory group was recorded in a survey (Table 2). Each meeting with the advisory group was held virtually and was approximately one hour long, conducted on a monthly basis. The members were renumerated $40 AUD per hour for their time in line with NSW Health consumer remuneration guidelines\u003cins cite=\"mailto:Ava%20Medley\" datetime=\"2025-03-31T08:30\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/ins\u003e(30). Prior to each meeting, a meeting agenda was disseminated for members to begin formulating ideas for discussion. The session agenda was dependent on the stage of research the project had achieved but was significantly guided by the desires of members and what they felt was an important topic for discussion. The advisory group members were considered co-researchers, their input was deemed as valuable as any another researcher, and their own individual lived experience recognises them as specifically informed about the topic.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 2. Demographic data of members of the youth advisory group. Total of 4 participants.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 301px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDemographic Category\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 326px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003en\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 301px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAge\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e21\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 326px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 301px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eState/Territory\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNew South Wales\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAustralia Capital Territory\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 326px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 301px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIdentify as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 326px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 301px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBorn overseas\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 326px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 301px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSpeak a language other than English at home\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 326px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 301px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGender\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWoman\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNon-binary\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 326px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 301px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSexuality\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHeterosexual\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAsexual biromantic\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 326px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 301px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGender incongruent to sex assigned at birth\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 326px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThrough the methodology of co-design (31), an iterative cycle of reflection, data collection and action was enacted as shown in Figure 1. The cyclic methodology allowed for rigorous representative research to be conducted that was better informed by consumers. \u0026nbsp;Every member attended each of the six meetings, and the sessions ranged from one to two hours in length. the group discussions on issues, suggestions and recommendations were all guided by the members\u0026apos; contributions and priorities. \u0026nbsp;The first meeting was centered on member introductions and, establishing an understanding of the study\u0026rsquo;s goals, and building rapport. In subsequent sessions, it was important for the facilitator to guide the reiterative nature of the methodology but refrain from guiding the opinions and suggestions made by members. At the commencement of each session, participants were provided with the meeting minutes and meeting recordings to allow for reflections on the outcomes and recommendations in the final meetings.\u003cdel cite=\"mailto:Ava%20Medley\" datetime=\"2025-04-07T10:04\"\u003e.\u003c/del\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe recommendations made for Australian high schools regarding the delivery and content of their sexual and reproductive education were informed by the thematic analysis conducted in this project in conjunction with the Youth Advisory Group. Each recommendation was contextualised by thematic analysis data, alongside recommendations by the \u003cem\u003eInternational Technical Guidance for Comprehensive Sexuality Education\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(UNESCO, 2018). These recommendations were discussed as part of the meetings; the key theme(s) being discussed, paired with the corresponding \u003cem\u003eKey Concept\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(detailed in the \u003cem\u003eInternational Technical Guidance for Comprehensive Sexuality Education\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(UNESCO, 2018)). Prior to the meeting, members were asked to review the UNESCO guidance and outcomes outlined in previous meeting minutes, with the opportunity to submit initial suggestions for recommendations via a poll open field response. This allowed members to give suggestions independent of each other in the meeting to minimise confirmation bias among members. Despite the existing guidance by UNESCO for sexuality education, the recommendations developed in this research project are specific to the Australian youth population, with clear appraisal for the needs and preferences of Australian youth. For accuracy, these recommendations were reviewed by two clinicians (AD and TD) who practice reproductive medicine to ensure the correct terms and phrases were used.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eRegardless of the diverse demographics and individual experiences of participants, universal themes became apparent across the data set. Three themes and eight subthemes were identified. The three themes were: Culture of sex, Content of sexuality education, and Sources of sexual health information beyond formal education. See Appendix 2 for evidence of these themes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTheme 1: Culture of sex\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSubtheme 1.1: Sex being taboo\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e Participants recognised that there is a societal perception of any conversation about sex to be taboo, stating their parents, teachers and online community are inclined to avoid conversations of sex. They additionally introduced the notion that they \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003ecopy\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo; their superiors in what is believed to be acceptable within society, perpetuating the practice of ignoring such issues because they are led to believe it is something that we \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eshould not talk about\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo;.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI think we copy like adults and what they see is like acceptable and what they think is like okay to talk about and so like from that young age you see like your teachers don't want to talk about it. Your parents don't want to talk about it, people on the internet that you found on YouTube are a little bit awkward about talking about it too. Um it kind of just gives this idea that like it's not something that you should talk about\u003c/em\u003e (Female, 17, Bisexual)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe shame around discussing sex broadly, was also relevant when discussing health issues resulting from sex, such as sexually transmitted infections.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eInfections and diseases they\u0026rsquo;re definitely like this massive taboo like if you have one just don't say anything, and don't talk about them and they don't exist\u003c/em\u003e (Female, 17, Bisexual)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSubtheme 1.2: General poor sex culture\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipants raised issues about the lack of consideration for the consequences of sex, particularly from males engaging in heteronormative sex. Among males, the gratification from others for engaging in sexual acts was discussed as being more important than the potential consequences that eventuate from sex. However, the same sexual acts and behaviours of females were detested and substantiated grounds for \u0026lsquo;slut-shaming\u0026rsquo; despite the individual being subject to the same peer pressure.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eSo I'm gonna have sex, don't care about the consequences because in the end, If I knock someone up I can leave. That that's their mentality. It's a lot of peer pressure, it's kind of that societal expectation to, again, guy sleeps with girl, guy gets, you know, a high five from his friends. Girls sleeps with guy, girl gets slut-shamed\u003c/em\u003e (Female, 17)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis discrepancy in how different genders are viewed differently for the same behaviours was not only observed within focus group discussions, but was identified as a wider ideology that youth are keenly aware of. This phenomenon was epitomised by a male participant who used the term \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003emisogynistic\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo; to describe fellow male classmates.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eAs boys we have a tendency to have, to be honest, a sort of misogynistic, very old, poor, I don\u0026rsquo;t know, behaviour\u003c/em\u003e (Male, 15, Heterosexual)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTheme 2: Content of sexuality education\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSubtheme 2.1: Motives of sex for youth\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eYouth reported that the understanding that youth are unlikely to be engaging in sexual acts for reproduction was not addressed in sexuality education. Participants expressed a desire for content angled towards the various contexts for engaging in sex through multiple expressions of curiosity towards sex for pleasure and intimacy, rather than for procreation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eBut I also think sex education really only teaches people what having sex is not how to have sex, because I feel like really just saying like a penis can go in a vagina that's, that's not the only way to have sex and also how to have pleasurable sex like not for reproduction. I feel like it's something that's not talked about, which people who are younger, are probably not doing it for reproduction\u003c/em\u003e (Nonbinary, 17, preferred not to state sexuality,)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eThe whole idea of sex in terms of sex ed is for procreation rather than anyone's pleasure and being intimate with a partner, and the positives of that can generate, that idea - definitely not touched on\u003c/em\u003e (Female, 17, Bisexual)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSubtheme 2.2: Lack of fertility content\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhen reviewing focus group transcripts, it was evident that the convention in which school-based sexuality education addresses fertility falls short of participant expectations. Fertility content, or lack thereof, was described as \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003enever\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo; being taught to participants in their high school sexuality education, prioritising fearmongering to encourage abstinence.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI have never been taught anything to do with fertility, because if they are to teach anything in sex ed it\u0026rsquo;s more just trying to scare us into not doing it since it is basically not teaching us anything about fertility because that will kind of like, they think it's encouraging us\u003c/em\u003e (Female, 15, Bisexual)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWith anticipation of their future parenting intentions, participants admitted to being concerned about infertility when progressing into adulthood.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eYeah, we never touched on infertility at all or anything in regards to that which is something that I worry about personally like going into like my adult life\u003c/em\u003e (Female, 17, Bisexual)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSubtheme 2.3: Lack of LGBTQIA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;inclusive content\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInclusive LGBTQIA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;content was also overlooked in sexuality education of participants. Specifically, participants expressed curiosity about non-heteronormative forms of sexual interactions. However, this curiosity was often seemingly met with teachers who were either not knowledgeable in such topics or were reluctant to address them.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eOur male teacher didn't know pretty much anything about the female system or how to have like sex with it and so when I asked how two women could do it or how two men, he had no idea\u003c/em\u003e (Nonbinary, 17)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis approach to sexuality education where female-with-male sexual interaction is exclusively taught, not only fails to address alternative mechanics of sex but additionally denies crucial safe sex information to students in non-heteronormative relationships. This naivet\u0026eacute; leaves students vulnerable to sexually transmitted infections.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eWe basically just got taught the examples of sex basically we only got taught just you know just, male and female. And then contraception just, yeah just, you got a male, female, like, um, yeah I didn't know about that whole, you know, how you\u0026rsquo;d have to use it for two men\u003c/em\u003e (Male, 18, Heterosexual)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSubtheme 2.4: Sexually transmitted infection content\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e Participants reported semantic understanding of sexually transmitted infections through their sexuality education but recognised a lack of deeper comprehension of the topic. Interestingly, participants repeatedly used rhetorical language, suggesting attempts to draw attention to their lack of understanding.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI know what all the STIs are? Goodness no, like, do I understand them all? No, of course not. And the fact that they spread over so many, but didn't go into them in as much detail\u003c/em\u003e (Female, 16, Bisexual)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis disconnect is further affirmed through the quote and question, by another participant. The manner in which participants articulate their experiences regarding this aspect of sexuality education is repeatedly positioned to persuade the focus group moderator of their lack of understanding and demonstrate their lack of depth in content.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eChlamydia. of course, I know what I know what the word is, I don't really know what it is. I know it's an STI. Right?\u003c/em\u003e (Female, 17, did not yet know sexuality)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSubtheme 2.5: Vague and inexplicit content\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe vague nature of sexuality education persisted across key learning areas, with content being taught superficially and without clear purpose. Multiple participant recounts described the method of teaching consent to be inadequate whereby schools utilised an analogy of offering someone a cup of tea when educating about sexual consent.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI'm sure you've heard of it, the tea video for consent. And I feel like it's kind of it's kind of backwards, it defeats the purpose in my opinion because we have to be explicit to be educated.\u003c/em\u003e (Female, 16, Heterosexual)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe maturity of participants was reflected through the recognition that using analogies of \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eforcing tea down someone\u0026rsquo;s throat\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo; for something that has serious consequences is inappropriate and reduces the severity of an act of sexual assault. Generally, participants expressed a dissatisfaction with the avoidance of explicit discussion around sexuality education topics and their frustration with the use of far-stretched metaphors.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eThe tea video like people don't want an analogy of like don't force it down to someone\u0026rsquo;s throat. No don't force somebody to have sex if they don't want to wait. We're like unintentionally glossing things over and in that sense we\u0026rsquo;re lessening the idea of the consequence, like, okay, forcing tea down someone's throat you're going to burn your throat but or forcing someone to have sex you could give them an STI. You couldn't leave them with permanent trauma, you can leave them with a child.\u003c/em\u003e (Female, 17)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTheme 3: Sources of sexual health information beyond formal education\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSubtheme 3.1: Impact of digital media on sexuality understanding\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipants discussed the plethora of media platforms accessible to youth, from which may glorify sex and sexual issues. Consequences of such consumption, whereby youth idolise content, was spoken about with particular concern regarding the romanticisation of sexual assault and abuse in an environment that doesn't \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003ehave adequate consent education within schools\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo;.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eSo I think a lot of the media like that, whether it be made movies, TV, pornography, whatever. A lot of the time they glorify and romanticise borderline assault and abuse and when we don't have adequate consent education within schools already, we can't see that when we're consuming it we consume it and idolise it\u003c/em\u003e (Female, 17)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe reality of the media being where youth consume sexual content further highlights the potential for unhealthy expectations for sexual interactions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eObviously the media is a big portrayal even in movies that's where you first come across a lot of like interactions. And then the idea of consent is obviously not the core of a lot of these movies\u003c/em\u003e (Female, 17, Bisexual)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eAnd then people get very misinformed ideas when they consuming pornography and the way that relationships should work in terms of that I've seen people's ideas and things like that, and how skewed they are from reality type of thing, because of that, just not being able to separate that and, like, that's fiction, from like the real world type of thing\u003c/em\u003e (Female, 17, Bisexual)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSubtheme 3.2: Sexual health misinformation\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhen accessing sources of sexuality education, the legitimacy and accuracy of the source was questioned by participants. The \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003egrey area\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo; which is introduced when accessing sexual and reproductive health information online, is established when participants require additional information but are met with the chaotic counsel of the internet.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eYeah, and the internet is also a very dangerous place in terms of talking about sexual stuff, because you don't know who the age of the person is who you're talking to, the validity of the article you're looking at. Even if the source, you have is serious or satire, you never know, like, it's a complete grey area\u003c/em\u003e (Agender, 17, Bisexual)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecommendations for sexuality education\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecommendations for Australian sexuality education were co-designed with the Youth Advisory Group (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). The recommendations were made in consideration of the results from the Thematic Analysis, each member's lived experience as a young person experiencing Australia\u0026rsquo;s sexuality education and elements from UNESCO\u0026rsquo;s International Technical Guidance for Sexuality Education (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). Additionally, these recommendations were reviewed by reproductive clinicians to ensure accuracy and clinical relevance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCo-designed recommendations made with the Youth Advisory Group for Australian high schools when delivering sexuality education.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRelated Theme\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecommendation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGeneral Recommendations\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Ensure that sexuality education is taught consistently across all grade levels, covering age-appropriate content that aligns with current research and changing social environments.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Create platforms and safe spaces within schools for students to ask questions without fear of judgement or misinformation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Promote training programs for educators to ensure they have access to up-to-date resources and information to effectively and confidently teach sexuality education.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCulture of Sex\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Address how societal and gender norms, peer pressure and expectations impact individual attitudes and behaviour.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSources of Sexuality Education beyond Formal Education\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Educate students on the fictional portrayals of sexuality (including relationships, fertility, consent, STIs) within mass media and society, and how this is potentially harmful and misleading.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Develop critical thinking skills on how to evaluate the credibility and reliability of media sources providing sexual and reproductive health information.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Promote active involvement and support for parents, guardians, and community members in their children's sexuality education by providing resources, guidance, and opportunities for engagement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eContent of Sexuality Education\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Implement direct scenarios and explanations to describe sexual acts and consent, replacing vague language and euphemisms, to reduce uncertainty and convey consequences of non-consensual consent (e.g. trauma, STIs and unintended pregnancy) and the legal repercussions of such acts.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Explore current research regarding adolescent sexual behaviour, emphasising that many young people engage in sexual activities for a variety of reasons (e.g. pleasure, intimacy and self-exploration) other than for reproduction.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Incorporate and explore all genders and sexualities to expand understanding of LGBTQIA+. Use inclusive, non-gender specific terms when describing sexual intercourse, pleasure, contraception, sexual partners and consent.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Provide comprehensive education on all STIs, inclusive of all identities. Discuss prevalence, prevention and treatment relevant to current Australian statistics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Provide comprehensive education on reproduction and fertility, and the role of contraceptives and their effective use. Consider factors that affect fertility in all genders and the limitations of reproduction. Discuss prevalence, prevention and treatment of reproductive issues and pathologies to include tubal and unexplained infertility, polycystic ovarian syndrome, PCOS, and endometriosis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn this study, a thematic analysis of focus group transcripts of Australian high school students was conducted to explore ideas and issues within their sexuality education. Our analysis revealed three prominent themes: \u0026ldquo;culture of sex\u0026rdquo;, \u0026ldquo;content of sexuality education\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;sources of sexuality education beyond formal education\u0026rdquo;. These themes maintain a dynamic relationship with one another, each independently influencing an adolescent's individual sexuality education experience and their understanding, illustrating evidence of a larger issue within society. Through the identification of this thematic data, informed, context-relevant recommendations developed with a Youth Advisory Group, emerged. The following discussion will attempt to explore these themes in parallel and as a fluid issue to understand the complexity of sexuality education in Australia, substantiating recommendations made.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study identified a pivotal discourse regarding the culture of sex, underpinned by sex as a taboo topic, modelled by those in positions of power. Despite the introduction of basic sexual health education in Australia prior to the Second World War in response to the perceived threat of sexually transmitted diseases, it was masked in conservative values (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e), giving support to the idea that \u0026lsquo;secrecy and indecency are necessary associates of sex\u0026rsquo; (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e). Despite now being able to reflect on such naivety towards sexuality education, the results from this study suggest this outlook prevails in K-12 educational institutions today. It appears the need for improvement of sex education is influenced by a society in which conversations about sex are still being avoided and adolescents are considered to need \u0026ldquo;protecting\u0026rdquo; from the realities of sex, maintaining this cultural norm of sexual ignorance being equated with sexual innocence (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e). This emphasis on \u0026ldquo;safety\u0026rdquo; and protecting adolescence from the risk of sex (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e), is clear within the sexuality education experience of this study\u0026rsquo;s participants. This study highlights the asymmetry and irony within this idea, whereby those who would naturally be considered immature, young people, are more inclined to seek out understanding about a mature subject than mature community themselves. Through youth challenging the assumption that they will simply acquire an understanding of sexuality and reproductive issues within a nation\u0026rsquo;s habitual culture of ignorance and taboo, poses a defiant, contradictory stance on this culture. It is only through shifting the lens of sex to be something normal and developmental that we can begin to break down this enduring negative attitude towards sexuality education (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWithin this study, the justification for engaging in sex due to peer pressure, and the use of normalisation of sex to motivate others to also engage in sexual activities was observed. Both the perceived and experienced societal expectations to engage in sexual acts was sustained by youth, situating this study\u0026rsquo;s findings into the larger paradigm of the negative culture of sex. Within the literature, peer pressure has been identified as the \u0026ldquo;social influence of peers on an individual to conform to a particular way of acting or thinking\u0026rdquo; (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e). Youth within this study contribute further evidence to this hypothesis; peers encouraging the dismissal of personal values to participate in the culturally accepted sexual behaviours other peers engage in. This practice was particularly strong within males engaging in heteronormative sex, contributing to normalisation of attitudes of misogynistic nature. Interestingly, misogyny was another key discourse within Australia\u0026rsquo;s enduring negative sex culture (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e) that the youth in this study identified. Most alarmingly, males within this study admitted understanding the existence of this rudimentary culture, yet expressed no inclination to change their views, emphasising the power of Australia\u0026rsquo;s culture in modelling the norms adopted by our youth. This study\u0026rsquo;s recommendations sought to consider the impact of this culture on sexuality education, and consequently, multiple recommendations were developed to provide a more balanced view on sex liberated from misogyny and gender expectations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor a cultural shift to occur, it is necessary for youth to engage in their sexual and reproductive health education to develop the knowledge and skills of this educational content. This study revealed that this is dependent on both the ability of youth to relate to the content being taught, and, whether the content captures a comprehensive range of issues. The disconnect between one\u0026rsquo;s own sexual endeavours and what is being taught within sexuality education appears to be due partly to the inability of participants to associate with content that does not relate to the sexual practices and opinions held by youth themselves. There was a clear consensus that youth are not engaged in sex for reproduction, instead they engage for pleasure, yet their education disregards this motivation. The recommendation made with the advisory group, naturally, was to include these various motivations for sex. This study's findings align with international discourse of inclusion of pleasure for all individuals within sexuality education (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe irrelevance youth perceive in their sexuality education is made worse through disparities and inadequacy in fertility education. Knowledge of fertility issues and content remains low in Australian adolescents (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e), which, paired with this study reporting on the lack of fertility content within the Australian curriculum, is unsurprising (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e). Logically this has led to a strong emphasis on improving fertility education with Australia (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e). Yet it seems the Australian curriculum remains rooted in values of pregnancy prevention, with a clear priority to reduce teen pregnancy rates atop reproductive health (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e). However paramount as reducing teen pregnancy may be, within the context of Australian teens this issue is of minor significance when adjacent to the prevalence of teenage mothers which has more than halved since 2011, representing only 1.5% of all mothers (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e). It could be concluded that the conservative values of Australia\u0026rsquo;s past (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e), as previously discussed, hold true with intimidation tactics that are overly concerned with \u0026ldquo;protecting\u0026rdquo; adolescents from the realities of sex. The prominent subtheme, lack of fertility content, that arose in the thematic analysis could be attributed to the original survey's (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e) purpose to investigate fertility knowledge and thus influence the topic of fertility arising within focus groups. However, while the topic may have been introduced by the researcher, it does not influence the experience discussed by the students. The consequential interpretation of this theme and its salience could be argued, however within this study the Youth Advisory Group reduced this bias through consumer validation and recognised that fertility is a significant issue in Australia\u0026rsquo;s sexuality education.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInclusive sexuality education has long been sought after in Australia and this aspiration was voiced within this study, contributing to the consensus that Australia\u0026rsquo;s sexuality education is not considered inclusive of diverse genders and sexualities. Alongside the extensive dialogue and petition by the focus group participants, the study\u0026rsquo;s Youth Advisory Group felt it appropriate to explicitly incorporate inclusive language and LGBTQIA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;recommendations made to Australian high schools. With 11% of Australians under the age of 25 identifying as LGBTQIA+, this is expected (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e). However, the proclivity of current sexuality education to focus on solely reproductive, heteronormative, penetrative sex, over-exemplifies one instance of sexual activity and fails to address the plethora of sexual experiences and activities of a wide range of individuals beyond cis men and women (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e). This ignorance for inclusion furthers unfamiliarity with key contraceptive and disease prevention information for those in non-heteronormative relationships, shaping inequitable opportunity for sexual health in youth. The desire for explicit inclusive LGBTQIA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;content has repeatedly been met with dispute from religious and political groups concerned with content to be \u0026ldquo;undermining\u0026rdquo; traditional gender roles (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e). As the curriculum reflects Australian political and social beliefs (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e) either our society as a whole does not value inclusivity, which the study\u0026rsquo;s participants reject through focus group discussions, or the curriculum remains overly concerned with pacifying opposing educational values through ambiguity. The political convenience in remaining enigmatic shifts the onus to schools and teachers to tailor sexuality education to a diverse group of students (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e). Educators dictating as to whether this occurs based upon their own motivation, leaves many adolescents without appropriate sexuality education, as was discerned within this study.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn contrast to the minimal or lack of coverage in fertility and LGBTQIA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;topics, the depth and transparency of sexually transmitted infection content was the primary concern for participants. This sentiment was shared among other Australian students, who reported that STI content was taught superficially (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e). Up-to-date, comprehensive sexually transmitted infection education was thus another direct recommendation that emerged from this study. The large number of young people being diagnosed with preventable sexually transmitted diseases emphasises a clear lack of understanding of the transmission and awareness of STIs. In 2022, Australian 15\u0026ndash;29-year-olds represented 69% of Chlamydia cases, 48% of Gonorrhoea cases and 31% of Syphilis cases (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e). The overarching poor culture of sex within Australia and the direct hesitancy for a sex-positive education to be taught to Australia\u0026rsquo;s adolescents has been established as problematic within this study. Thus, it would not be presumptuous to assume that this lack of depth within STI content is a by-product of the taboo Australia holds for adolescent sex. Complementing this, without a broad range of contexts and scenarios considered when educating on sexually transmitted infections, a level of uncertainty regarding who the content is relevant to remains; particularly in non-heteronormative relationships (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e). Independently, poor STI education manifests in broad, universal STI rates in adolescents. However, when paired alongside shortfalls in LGBTQIA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;content, it could explain why gay and bisexual men are disproportionately overrepresented in STI rates (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e). The inclusion of LGBTQIA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;STI content presents a potential opportunity for both the depth of this content to be strengthened and the previous issue of diversity within sexuality education to be better addressed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study\u0026rsquo;s findings indicate that some topics and concepts were not taught directly or with explicit language but rather with the use of analogies. For example, the use of \u0026ldquo;the tea video\u0026rdquo; (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e) was discussed as a vessel for educating adolescents on consent education in this study. It is established that the use of analogies is not uncommon in education and can be a useful tool in increasing comprehension through well-constructed comparison (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e). However, in the context of sexual health education, the juxtaposition of using the analogy of forcing someone to drink a cup of tea to explain sexual assault is not a well-constructed nor appropriate comparison. Optimistically, the tea video does allow for and encourage more nuanced discussion within the classroom and is potentially a great tool to introduce the concept of consent (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e). Nevertheless, Australian youth find the context in which this video has been used, either independently or in an environment where there may be varying levels of understanding of consent, to be inadequate. Hence, a clear recommendation that specifically encouraged the dismissal of \u0026ldquo;vague language and euphemisms\u0026rdquo; within school-based sexuality education was endorsed by the Youth Advisory Group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGiven this study\u0026rsquo;s position alongside the extensive literature, it is justified to affirm Australia\u0026rsquo;s sexuality education as insufficient according to youth. As this study further explored, an educational system that does not satisfy the standard for sexuality education, whether this be due to its lack of relevance or comprehensiveness, leaves adolescents to rely on alternate forms of information to source sexuality education. The influential potential of these informal sources of information on sex and sexuality understanding was regarded as substantive and contributed to young people being misinformed about sex and relationships and to adopt false perceptions of real-life sexual experiences. The unrealistic portrayal of sex and relationships in the media admittedly concerns youth, with worries that widely idolised stereotypes will continue, in alignment with existing literature (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e). The ability of adolescents to consume unhealthy portrayals of sex and relationships without a critically informed consciousness was brought forth given the familiar propensity for media to make sexual innuendos and imply sexual meaning. Whether consciously or subconsciously, it is understood that young adults will consume media as they progress to adulthood, and that this can have a key influence on their sexual socialisation (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e). Generalisations made by participants regarding permissive sexual attitudes and the influence of media on their peers\u0026rsquo; experiences align with published literature that positively associates social media use with these attitudes (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e55\u003c/span\u003e). This study did not attribute these unrealistic expectations with conscious media consumption, but rather highlighted the risks associated with the limited sexuality education and exposure to such content.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBeyond media having the potential to influence adolescent ideas and attitudes, this study found other external sources of sexuality education to misinform youth. The current need to assess whether a source is accurate has been identified within Australian youth previously, which reported young people being required to distinguish factual sexual health knowledge from opinion or experience (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e). The promotion of critical thinking skills in the context of sexuality education in media was for this reason, recommended within this study. Despite this uncertainty in youth when accessing sources of sexuality education, there is obvious potential for the internet to offer sexual and reproductive health information with its ease of access (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e57\u003c/span\u003e). Thus, to improve the ability of young people\u0026rsquo;s understanding of what an appropriate source of information is, would reduce the propagation of inaccurate ideas and false \u0026ldquo;facts\u0026rdquo; about sexuality and offer opportunity to strengthen one\u0026rsquo;s ability to critically consume sexuality information. Considering the inequities of access and exposure to appropriate sexuality content in school settings identified in this study, resources outside of formal education become essential to some youth when exploring this content. The capacity of such accessible sources to inform youth could compliment school-based education to strengthen understanding or alternatively provide a safe source of information for those in sheltered settings.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudy limitations\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe use of focus group data that was collected by another researcher may have introduced the opportunity for bias. Researchers can introduce their own interpretation bias when collecting and analysing data, thus two sets of researcher bias may have influenced the data set used; one during data collection, one during analysis. However, due to the focus groups being conducted prior to this study it consequently reduced the likelihood of leading questions relative to this study\u0026rsquo;s outcomes to be asked as this study\u0026rsquo;s research question was not considered. This is not the case for the subtheme of fertility related content that arose, as this discussion point could be attributed the original study\u0026rsquo;s research question. Nevertheless, the use of an advisory group within this study that validated thematic analysis significantly reduced this bias.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIt is a limitation when using focus groups that the participants may not represent an accurate diversity of the population. The focus group participants within this study were reflective of the broader Australian population in terms of sexuality, age, language spoken at home, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status and location. However, the focus group participant population did not reflect the gender proportions within the Australian population. The inclusion of only four male participants to contribute to the thematic analysis reduces the representation of male ideas and values. Additionally, the small sample size of participants in the focus group population limits the ideas and experiences that are collected. A small sample bias increases the likelihood for incorrect assumptions to be concluded and disrupt a studies validity (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e). This may contribute to the saturation of ideas however, the introduction of the Youth Advisory Group, a separate subgroup of Australian youth, reduces the likelihood for sample group biases as they independently validated the ideas of the focus groups.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA further limitation of this study was the lack of diverse demographic representation of those who engaged in the co-design process; in this study, the Youth Advisory Group. As the Group had a total of four members, an accurate representation of the Australian youth population could not be achieved without the recruitment of additional members, highlighting recruitment challenges and consequent limitations. Specifically, we did not have any male participants to provide guidance and contribute to the recommendations for Australian high schools when delivering sexuality education. Arguably, despite the unbalanced spread of consumers, it is still favourable to have members of the youth community contribute to this study rather than none. To mitigate this in future investigations or recommendations, the opportunity to refine and validate these findings with a more diverse group is suggested.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eAustralia\u0026rsquo;s current sexuality education needs reform and refinement to ensure it is relevant to the wants and needs of its current youth population. This project aimed to provide insight into perceptions of youth about their sexuality education and to co-design recommendations to improve sexuality education. The study revealed that youth consider the prevailing attitudes towards sex, the quality and content of sexuality education offered at schools, and the influence of external sources like social media, the internet and peers as significant issues in their school-based education. Despite these themes capturing primarily negative experiences, it introduced direction into advancements. Through co-designing recommendations with the Youth Advisory Group, we were able to make relevant, unambiguous recommendations to refine and contextualise current sexuality education practice. This study highlights the complex dynamics influencing sexuality education in an Australian context. This contributes to an increasingly comprehensive understanding of these dynamics, essential to improve national sexual and reproductive health outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch3\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was approved by University of Newcastle Human Ethics Committee\u0026nbsp;under the protocol numbers H-2020-0301 and H-2020-0018. Written informed consent was obtained from study participants and from parents if the participant volunteered parental consent.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eAvailability of data\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to identifiable participant data but are available from J.S on reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe author’s declare no competing interests\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eFunding\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis research was supported by a CSIRO grant (G2300405) and the John Hunter Hospital Charitable Trust Grant (G2300395).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJ.M.S is funded by a Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DECRA) fellowship (G2001133).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eAuthor contributions\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA.M wrote the main manuscript and conducted the analysis of the data. S.D, S.M, S.M and C.T assisted in the data analysis and development of recommendations. T.D and A.D \u0026nbsp;reviewed the recommendations from a clinical perspective. E.F, T.B and J.S conducted the focus groups which gathered the data set used for analysis in this study. \u0026nbsp; E.F, C.C, K.G.P were co-supervisors of this study. J.M.S was the primary supervisor of this study. All authors reviewed the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGoldfarb ES, Lieberman LD. Three Decades of Research: The Case for Comprehensive Sex Education. J Adolesc Health. 2021;68(1):13\u0026ndash;27.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFamily Planning Australia NSHiSAC. Sexuality and Sexual Health Education Best Practice Statement. 2023.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUNESCO JUNPoHA, United Nations Population Fund. United Nations Children\u0026rsquo;s Fund, United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, World Health Organistaion. International technical guidance on sexual education: an evidence-informed approch2018. 138 p.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUNESCO. Emerging evidence, lessons and practice in comprehensive sexuality education: a global review. 2015.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim EJ, Park B, Kim SK, Park MJ, Lee JY, Jo AR, et al. A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Comprehensive Sexuality Education Programs on Children and Adolescents. Healthc (Basel). 2023;11:18.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMaticka-Tyndale E, Tenkorang EY. A multi-level model of condom use among male and female upper primary school students in Nyanza, Kenya. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(3):616\u0026ndash;25.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOringanje C, Meremikwu MM, Eko H, Esu E, Meremikwu A, Ehiri JE. Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2(2):Cd005215.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLim L, Hoppe M, Kennedy L, Gunderson A, Wang L, Etezadi-Amoli N. Young Adults\u0026rsquo; Understanding of Modifiable Risk Factors of Infertility. Women's Health Rep. 2024;5(1):815\u0026ndash;24.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEzer P, Kerr L, Fisher CM, Heywood W, Lucke J. Australian students\u0026rsquo; experiences of sexuality education at school. Sex Educ. 2019;19(5):597\u0026ndash;613.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAustralian Curriculum ACARA. AaRA. Implementation of the Australian Curriculum 2010 [.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEducation Act. NSW Government(1990).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGovernment VS. About sexuality education 2023 [Available from: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/teachingresources/discipline/physed/Pages/about.aspx#link90\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/teachingresources/discipline/physed/Pages/about.aspx#link90\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchool Education Act. State of Western Australia(1999).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEzer PP, Jennifer; Jones T, Fisher. Christopher. 2nd National Survey of Australian Teachers of Sexuality Eductaion 2018. Australian Reasearch Centre in Sex, Health \u0026amp; Society; 2020.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFisher CW, Kerr A, Bellamy L. Rosalind; Ezer, Paulina. 6th National Survey of Australian Secondary Students and Sexual Health 2018. 2019.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePower J, Kauer S, Fisher C. Chapman-Bellamy,. The 7th National Survey of Australian Secondary Students and Sexual Health. 2022.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKing J, McManus H, Kwon J, Gray R, McGregor S. HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia: Annual surveillance report 2023. Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney;; 2023.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAustralian Government DoHaAC. About sexual health 2023 [Available from: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.health.gov.au/topics/sexual-health/about#:~:text=about%2016%25%20of%20Australians%20have,95%25%20for%20infectious%20syphilis\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.health.gov.au/topics/sexual-health/about#:~:text=about%2016%25%20of%20Australians%20have,95%25%20for%20infectious%20syphilis\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNewman JEKD, Paul RC, Chambers GM. Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand 2022. National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit. University of New South Wales; 2024.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRossi BV, Abusief M, Missmer SA. Modifiable Risk Factors and Infertility: What are the Connections? Am J Lifestyle Med. 2014;10(4):220\u0026ndash;31.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSharma R, Biedenharn KR, Fedor JM, Agarwal A. Lifestyle factors and reproductive health: taking control of your fertility. Reproductive biology Endocrinol. 2013;11:1\u0026ndash;15.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHerbert DL, Lucke JC, Dobson AJ. Infertility, medical advice and treatment with fertility hormones and/or in vitro fertilisation: a population perspective from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2009;33(4):358\u0026ndash;64.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFord EA, Chojenta C, Bagade T, Sweeney S, Sutherland JM. Fertility knowledge in a cohort of Australia\u0026rsquo;s adolescents: a cross-sectional study of reproductive and sexual health education. Sex Educ. 2023:1\u0026ndash;19.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJacquez F, Vaughn LM, Wagner E. Youth as partners, participants or passive recipients: a review of children and adolescents in community-based participatory research (CBPR). Am J Community Psychol. 2013;51(1\u0026ndash;2):176\u0026ndash;89.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVanwesenbeeck I, Westeneng J, de Boer T, Reinders J, van Zorge R. Lessons learned from a decade implementing Comprehensive Sexuality Education in resource poor settings: The World Starts With Me. Sex Educ. 2016;16(5):471\u0026ndash;86.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAuthority AACAR. Curriculum Development Process. 2012.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChavula MP, Zulu JM, Hurtig A-K. Factors influencing the integration of comprehensive sexuality education into educational systems in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Reproductive Health. 2022;19(1).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAustralian Curriculum AaRA. Australian Curriculum: Health and Physical Education Version 9.0 2022 [Available from: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.acara.edu.au\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBraun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2006;3:77\u0026ndash;101.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHealth N. Consumer, carer and community member remuneration. 2023.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVargas C, Whelan J, Brimblecombe J, Allendera S. Co-creation, co-design and co-production for public health: a perspective on definitions and distinctions. Public Health Res Pract. 2022;32(2).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSwain S, Warne E, Hillel M. Ignorance is not innocence: Sex education in Australia, 1890\u0026ndash;1939. Sexual Pedagogies: Sex Education in Britain, Australia, and America, 1879\u0026ndash;2000. Springer; 2004. pp. 33\u0026ndash;52.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJackson S. How to make babies: Sexism in sex education. Women's Stud Int Q. 1978;1(4):341\u0026ndash;52.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAllen L. Pleasurable pedagogy\u0026rsquo;: young people's ideas about teaching \u0026lsquo;pleasure\u0026rsquo; in sexuality education. Twenty-First Century Soc. 2007;2(3):249\u0026ndash;64.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLehn EW, Chahboun S. Breaking taboos! From silence to support: understanding children\u0026rsquo;s sexuality in early childhood pedagogical practice. Front Educ. 2025;10.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDishion T, Piehler T, Myers MW. Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. 2008:72\u0026ndash;93.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRobinson KH. Reinforcing hegemonic masculinities through sexual harassment: issues of identity, power and popularity in secondary schools. Gend Educ. 2005;17(1):19\u0026ndash;37.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlldred P. Introduction to special issue. Sex Education: Sexuality Soc Learn. 2012;12(4):375\u0026ndash;81.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMartino W, Frank B. The tyranny of surveillance: Male teachers and the policing of masculinities in a single sex school. Gend Educ. 2006;18(1):17\u0026ndash;33.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMartins MV, Koert E, Sylvest R, Maeda E, Moura-Ramos M, Hammarberg K, et al. Fertility education: recommendations for developing and implementing tools to improve fertility literacy\u0026dagger;. Hum Reprod. 2023;39(2):293\u0026ndash;302.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMarson K. Legitimate sexpectations: The power of sex-ed. Scribe; 2022.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMitchell A, Smith A, Carman M, Schlichthorst M, Walsh J, Pitts M. Sexuality education in Australia in 2011. 2011.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHealth, AIo. Welfare. Australia's mothers and babies. Canberra: AIHW; 2024.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCarman MF, Bourne C, Power A, Rosenberg J. S. Research Matters: How many people are LGBTIQ? La Trobe University; 2020.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKauer S, Power J, Bourne A, Fisher C. The diverse but common definitions of sex for young people in Australia. Sex Educ. 2024:1\u0026ndash;17.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShannon B, Smith SJ. A lot more to learn than where babies come from\u0026rsquo;: Controversy, language and agenda setting in the framing of school-based sexuality education curricula in Australia. Sex Educ. 2015;15(6):641\u0026ndash;54.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLeahy D, Burrows L, McCuaig L, Wright J, Penney D. School health education in changing times: Curriculum. pedagogies and partnerships: Routledge; 2015.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWaling A, Fisher C, Ezer P, Kerr L, Bellamy R, Lucke J. Please Teach Students that Sex is a Healthy Part of Growing Up: Australian Students\u0026rsquo; Desires for Relationships and Sexuality Education. Sexuality Res Social Policy. 2021;18(4):1113\u0026ndash;28.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKing J, McManus H, Kwon J, Gray R, McGregor S. HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia: Annual surveillance report 2023. Kirby Institute. UNSW Sydney: Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney; 2023.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePolice TV, Tea. and Consent Youtube2015 [Available from: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZwvrxVavnQ\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZwvrxVavnQ\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGray ME, Holyoak KJ. Teaching by Analogy: From Theory to Practice. Mind, Brain, and Education. 2021;15(3):250\u0026thinsp;\u0026ndash;\u0026thinsp;63.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBragg S, Ponsford R, Meiksin R, Emmerson L, Bonell C. Dilemmas of school-based relationships and sexuality education for and about consent. Sex Educ. 2020.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWard LM. Does television exposure affect emerging adults' attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation. J Youth Adolesc. 2002;31:1\u0026ndash;15.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang Y, Miller LE, Harrison K. The relationship between exposure to sexual music videos and young adults' sexual attitudes. J Broadcast Electron Media. 2008;52(3):368\u0026ndash;86.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCoyne SM, Ward LM, Kroff SL, Davis EJ, Holmgren HG, Jensen AC, et al. Contributions of Mainstream Sexual Media Exposure to Sexual Attitudes, Perceived Peer Norms, and Sexual Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64(4):430\u0026ndash;6.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFraser S, Moore D, Waling A, Farrugia A. Making epistemic citizens: Young people and the search for reliable and credible sexual health information. Soc Sci Med. 2021;276:113817.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBarak A, Fisher WA. Toward an Internet-driven, theoretically-based, innovative approach to sex education. J Sex Res. 2001;38(4):324\u0026ndash;32.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFaber J, Fonseca LM. How sample size influences research outcomes. Dent Press J Orthod. 2014;19(4):27\u0026ndash;9.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"reproductive-health","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"reph","sideBox":"Learn more about [Reproductive Health](http://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com)","snPcode":"12978","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/12978/3","title":"Reproductive Health","twitterHandle":"@Reprod_Health","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Comprehensive sexuality education, adolescents, sexual and reproductive health","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6606642/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6606642/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003ch2\u003eBackground\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA comprehensive sexuality education is evidenced to provide youth with the skills and knowledge required to promote sexual and reproductive health. Comprehensive sexuality education is recommended globally as an effective intervention for a range of improved sexual health outcomes, including reducing sexually transmitted infections and teenage pregnancies. The Australian curriculum unsuccessfully attempts to provide a comprehensive sexuality education to Australian adolescents; observably, it is incohesive, with the relevance and delivery appearing to vary among students. Simultaneously in Australia, we sustain alarmingly high rates of sexually transmitted infections in young people and an adult population with increasing reliance on assisted reproductive technologies. The diverse identities of adolescents and the changing nature of sexuality in society warrant an in depth exploration into the ideas and issues of youth in order to provide sexuality education that is reflective of the population it serves and improve sexual and reproductive health outcomes nationally.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eMethods\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eUtilising qualitative research methodology, focus group transcripts of 15\u0026ndash;18-year-old Australians were analysed to better understand what is required within sexuality education. For increased validity and interpretation of data, this project utilised a Youth Advisory Group to validate the thematic analysis. The study\u0026rsquo;s Youth Advisory Group further engaged in the co-design and development of recommendations for delivering sexuality education in Australia that reflected the thematic findings from the focus groups and their own lived experience.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResults\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThematic analysis revealed three prominent themes within focus group participants\u0026rsquo; experiences; \u0026ldquo;culture of sex\u0026rdquo;, \u0026ldquo;content of sexuality education\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;sources of sexuality education beyond formal education\u0026rdquo;. The qualitative analysis revealed evidence of the complex relationship between these themes and Australia\u0026rsquo;s underperforming sexuality education. While these results were objectively undesirable, they presented guidance for the recommendations, informing the co-design conducted by the Youth Advisory Group.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConclusion\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe findings of this study, together with relevant literature, provide evidence for the complexities of adolescent sexual experience and of comprehensive sexuality education in the context of contemporary Australian high schools, to ultimately promote improved sexual and reproductive outcomes in Australia, now and in the future.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"“Be explicit to be educated ”: Using thematic analysis and co-design to investigate and understand sexuality education in Australian high schools","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-05-29 15:56:03","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6606642/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2025-06-26T08:47:56+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-06-14T00:06:58+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-06-13T21:28:59+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-06-04T15:30:15+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-06-04T02:01:41+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"328954756491927916745371321377623676570","date":"2025-05-28T23:03:11+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"297679474684396540456425824866066396616","date":"2025-05-26T21:26:41+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"14954638081990018220527811334868486677","date":"2025-05-26T04:54:43+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"218165448897544104024589065029287086882","date":"2025-05-25T22:12:53+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-05-23T11:13:22+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-05-08T01:46:18+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-05-08T01:45:41+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Reproductive Health","date":"2025-05-06T23:24:21+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"reproductive-health","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"reph","sideBox":"Learn more about [Reproductive Health](http://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com)","snPcode":"12978","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/12978/3","title":"Reproductive Health","twitterHandle":"@Reprod_Health","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"4384bfe4-8df5-4444-b52c-daf4637cb3b1","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 29th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-03-09T16:00:48+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-6606642","link":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-026-02288-y","journal":{"identity":"reproductive-health","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Reproductive Health"},"publishedOn":"2026-03-06 15:57:27","publishedOnDateReadable":"March 6th, 2026"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-05-29 15:56:03","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1186/s12978-026-02288-y","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-026-02288-y","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6606642","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6606642","identity":"rs-6606642","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}