Full text
92,465 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Phylogenomics and species delimitation in the brown snake Storeria dekayi (Natricidae) | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Phylogenomics and species delimitation in the brown snake Storeria dekayi (Natricidae) View ORCID Profile Victor Gabriel Castillo-Sanchez , View ORCID Profile Adrian Nieto-Montes de Oca , View ORCID Profile John J. Wiens , View ORCID Profile Marysol Trujano-Ortega , View ORCID Profile Uri O. García-Vazquez doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.30.685713 Victor Gabriel Castillo-Sanchez a Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Circuito de Posgrados, Cd. Universitaria , Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico b Laboratorio de Sistematica Molecular, Carrera de Biología, Unidad Multidisciplinaria de Investigación Experimental, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico , Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Victor Gabriel Castillo-Sanchez Adrian Nieto-Montes de Oca c Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico , Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Adrian Nieto-Montes de Oca John J. Wiens d Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona , Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A. Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for John J. Wiens Marysol Trujano-Ortega e Departamento de Conservación de la Biodiversidad, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Avenida Centenario Km 5.5 , AP 424, Chetumal, 77014, Quintana Roo, Mexico Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Marysol Trujano-Ortega Uri O. García-Vazquez b Laboratorio de Sistematica Molecular, Carrera de Biología, Unidad Multidisciplinaria de Investigación Experimental, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico , Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Uri O. García-Vazquez For correspondence: uri.garcia{at}zaragoza.unam.mx Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Preview PDF Abstract The brown snake, Storeria dekayi , is distributed across southeastern Canada, the eastern United States, and eastern Mexico, with isolated records in Central America. Despite its broad range, S. dekayi is currently recognized as a single species. Historically, eight subspecies were described based primarily on head coloration patterns, but subsequent genomic analyses of populations from the U.S.A led to their synonymization. Recently, a population discovered in the Cuatro Cienegas Basin, Coahuila, Mexico has been suggested to represent an undescribed endemic species. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationships within S. dekayi , with an emphasis on the previously unstudied populations from Mexico and Central America. To this end, we generated genomic data (ddRADseq) to conduct phylogenetic analyses, species-tree estimation, population-structure analyses, and species delimitation. Concatenated likelihood analyses estimated a tree in which populations of S. dekayi from the south-central U.S. were paraphyletic relative to an undescribed species from the Cuatro Cienegas Basin. Population structure and species delimitation analyses suggest the existence of three distinct species, including the populations from eastern North America (recognized as S. dekayi ), the population from Cuatro Cienegas, and the populations of S. dekayi from eastern Mexico and Central America. However, we conservatively recognize only two species. 1. Introduction The discovery of new species is essential for biodiversity conservation and understanding the speciation process ( Yi et al., 2023 ). Cryptic species are defined as genetically distinct lineages that are morphologically similar ( Bickford et al., 2007 ; Hending, 2025 ). However, substantial variation in coloration patterns may occur without corresponding genetic divergence ( Lifjeld, 2015 ; Pyron et al., 2016 ), potentially leading to misclassifications ( Cox and Davis Rabosky, 2013 ). The integration of molecular data in species delimitation has been crucial for uncovering cryptic species that are widely distributed across diverse taxonomic groups ( Nygren, 2014 ; Perez-Ponce de León and Poulin, 2016 ; Fišer et al., 2018 ; Li and Wiens, 2023 ; Hending, 2025 ). The discovery of cryptic species can be challenging when there is limited resolution of the tree based on certain molecular markers ( Quattrini et al., 2019 ). For instance, incomplete lineage sorting and historical hybridization can complicate species delimitation when relying on mitochondrial DNA data as the only type of evidence, particularly in recently diverged taxa ( Hickerson et al., 2006 ; Zheng et al., 2017 ; Steenwyk et al., 2023 ). Consequently, genome-wide data provide a powerful tool to detect gene-tree discordance and investigate the underlying causes of phylogenetic incongruence during rapid diversification events ( Arcila et al., 2017 ). Advances in genomic-scale DNA sequencing technologies have significantly increased the data available to help infer species boundaries ( Parker et al., 2022 ). Among these, Double Digest Restriction-Site Associated DNA Sequencing (ddRADseq) is a next-generation sequencing approach that enables the analysis of phylogeny, species limits, and population genetic structure by detecting thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome ( Rowe et al., 2011 ; Peterson et al., 2012 ; Wang et al., 2022 ). These data have been instrumental in helping to resolve species complexes using phylogenetic and species-delimitation methods ( Nieto-Montes de Oca et al., 2017 ; Barley et al., 2024 ; Burriel-Carranza et al., 2025 ). Furthermore, genomic data provide substantial power for detecting genetic structure within species, thereby enhancing our understanding of their genetic diversity ( Lavretsky et al., 2019 ; Piñeros et al., 2022 ). The brown snake ( Storeria dekayi ; Holbrook, 1839 ) has a broad distribution from Canada to Honduras. In eastern North America, it occurs from southern Ontario and Quebec in Canada and south to southern Florida, and west to eastern Texas in the United States. In Mexico, it occurs in the eastern part of the country, spanning from the northern states of Nuevo León and Tamaulipas to southern states including Veracruz, Puebla, and Chiapas. Additionally, isolated records have been reported from Central America, specifically in southern Guatemala and central Honduras ( Wallach et al., 2014 ; Uetz and Hosek, 2022). Eight subspecies of Storeria dekayi have been described across this range ( Fig. 1 ). These include (type localities in parentheses), S. d. anomala Dugès, 1888 (Orizaba, Veracruz, Mexico); S. d. dekayi (Massachusetts, U.S.A.); S. d. limnetes Anderson, 1961 (St. Charles Parish, Louisiana, U.S.A.); S. d. temporalineata Trapido, 1944 (San Rafael, Jicaltepec, Veracruz, Mexico); S. d. texana Trapido, 1944 (Kendall County, Texas, U.S.A.); S. d. tropica Cope, 1885 (Peten, Guatemala); S. d. victa Hay, 1892 (Florida, U.S.A.); and S. d. wrightorum Trapido, 1944 (Reelfoot Lake, Tennessee, U.S.A.). These subspecies were originally distinguished primarily based on coloration patterns and scale counts, with a general trend of higher ventral scale counts in more southern subspecies. Recent phylogenomic and morphological analyses have led to the synonymization of several of these taxa, with the exception of S. d. victa , which was elevated to a distinct species ( Pyron et al., 2016 ). However, no populations from Mexico and Central America were included in these analyses, making it unclear whether the subspecies occurring there should be synonymized or instead recognized as distinct species. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Type localities of Storeria dekayi subspecies (triangles) and the genetic samples used in this study (diamonds). The approximate geographic distributions of S . dekayi subspecies ( Trapido, 1944 ) are shaded to illustrate geographic coverage of sampling. Recently, García-Vazquez et al. (2019) reported the presence of an isolated Storeria population in the Cuatro Cienegas Basin (CCB) in Coahuila, Mexico, exhibiting a scale count pattern similar to that of S. dekayi . Based on phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial genes (ND2) and morphological differentiation, Vite-Hernandez (2023) concluded that this population represents a distinct lineage that is closely related to S. dekayi . This species has unique morphological characteristics relative to other Storeria , including a gray dorsum, a pale venter lacking dark spots, and a smaller body size. Consequently, he proposed recognizing this population as a new Storeria species, that was likely endemic to the CCB. This pattern of endemism has been observed in other reptile species, including Scincella kikaapoa García-Vazquez et al. 2010 , Gerrhonotus mccoyi García-Vazquez et al. 2018 , and Terrapene coahuila Schmidt and Owens, 1944 . This study aims to re-evaluate the species boundaries of Storeria dekayi populations, specifically those from Mexico and Central America. Previous studies addressing the taxonomy of this group relied on different types of molecular data and limited sampling, leading to inconclusive results regarding species limits. For example, Hernandez-Vite (2023) analyzed mitochondrial DNA sequences, whereas Pyron et al. (2016) used anchored hybrid enrichment (AHE) loci from North American populations. To address this gap, we use ddRADseq data from extensive sampling of S . dekayi populations and other Storeria species, to infer their phylogenetic relationships and species limits. Our working hypothesis is that Mexican and Central American populations may represent distinct evolutionary lineages, potentially warranting taxonomic recognition. 2. Methods 2.1. Taxon sampling To analyze the southernmost populations of Storeria dekayi , we focused our RADseq sampling on southern populations not included by Pyron et al. (2016) . We sampled 45 individuals from the genus ( Table 1 ; Fig. 1 ), including 38 specimens of S. dekayi sensu Pyron et al. (2016) representing the historical subspecies S. d. dekayi ( n =2 individuals) , S. d. texana ( n =29) , S. d. temporalineata ( n =6), and S. d. tropica ( n =1). Additionally, we included five individuals of S. occipitomaculata , four of S. storerioides , one of S. victa and two of Storeria sp. CCB ( Table 1 ). To root the phylogenetic tree, we used one sample of Thamnophis scalaris as an outgroup ( Nuñez et al., 2023 ). View this table: View inline View popup Table 1. Taxon sampling for ddRAD sequence data collection. Institutional abbreviations for museums and collections follow Sabaj (2023) , except for MZFZ (Museo de Zoología of the Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico); ANMO, AEVB, JAC and CIG numbers are field numbers for specimens to be catalogued in the MZFZ. 2.2. Molecular procedures 2.2.1. DNA extraction Whole genomic DNA was extracted from tissue samples using the Qiagen DNeasy Kit (Qiagen Inc.). Prior to library preparation, DNA concentration was quantified using a Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and quality was visually assessed on a 1% agarose gel. 2.2.2. ddRADseq libraries We generated ddRADseq libraries using a modified version of the protocol from Peterson et al. (2012) . Genomic DNA from each sample was digested using the restriction enzymes SbfI (recognition site 5′–CCTGCAGG–3′) and MspI (recognition site 5′–CCGG–3′). The digestion was performed by incubating the samples at 37°C for two hours in a thermocycler. The reaction mixture consisted of 26 μl of DNA (250 ng), 2.5 μl of 10× Cutsmart® buffer, 0.25 μl of MspI (20 U/μl), and 0.5 μl of SbfI (20 U/μl). The digestion products were then purified using 1.5× Sera-Mag Magnetic SpeedBeads. We then ligated the DNA fragments to specific adapters for SbfI and MspI. The ligation reaction was performed in a solution containing 30 μl of digested DNA, 1.5 μl of each specific adapter, 3.4 μl of 10× Ligase Buffer (NEB®), and 0.6 μl of T4 DNA Ligase (400 U/μl). This reaction was incubated at 22°C for 40 minutes, followed by 10 minutes at 65°C. The ligated products were purified using 1.5× Sera-Mag Magnetic SpeedBeads. We then amplified the restriction-ligation products using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primers specific for the Illumina sequencer. Each PCR reaction contained 20 μl of ligated DNA, 1.25 μM of specific adapters, 0.6 mM dNTPs, 6 μl of 5× Phusion Buffer HF, 0.3 μl of Phusion DNA Polymerase, and 0.6 μl of nuclease-free water. PCR conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 minutes, followed by 15 cycles of 94°C for 25 seconds, 57°C for 20 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes. Finally, the ddRADseq libraries were purified using 1.5× Sera-Mag Magnetic SpeedBeads. Library construction success was assessed using a Qubit Fluorometer, and DNA size selection (470–630 bp) was performed using a Pippin Prep automated size selector (Sage Science,®). The ddRADseq libraries were sequenced at Macrogen, Inc. using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. 2.2.3. Bioinformatic processing We processed the ddRADseq data using the ipyrad pipeline (version 0.7.19; Eaton and Overcast, 2020 ). Reads were filtered using a quality-score threshold of 28. Illumina adapters were removed using the trimming option, and the resulting de novo clusters were aligned with Muscle version 3.8.31 ( Edgar, 2004 ). To estimate the optimal clustering threshold (CT) that minimizes false homozygosity and heterozygosity (i.e., the optimal CT), we generated assemblies in ipyrad whit default values, using eight different CT values (set at increments of 0.2 between 0.84 and 0.98) and then evaluated five metrics based on population and landscape genetics, as proposed by McCartney-Melstad et al. (2019) . These five metrics were (Figs. S1 and S2): (1) percentage of loci inferred as paralogues; (2) per-individual percent heterozygosity; (3) total number of variable sites (single-nucleotide polymorphisms; SNPs); (4) cumulative variance explained by the first eight principal components of the genetic data (PCs); and (5) Pearson’s correlation coefficient between pairwise genetic dissimilarity and the percentage of missing data. Metrics 1 and 2 identified 94% as the optimal sequence similarity threshold for our dataset, while both Pearson’s correlation coefficient and the cumulative variance explained by the first eight PCs favored an 84% threshold. Metric 3, in turn, identified an optimal clustering threshold of 92%. Based on these results, and following the approach proposed by McCartney-Melstad et al. (2019) , we clustered and aligned the data using a 92% threshold (Figs. S1 and S2). We set the minimum number of samples per locus to 40% for phylogenetic analysis (Fig. S3). The final dataset comprised 875,462 base pairs and 8,519 unlinked SNPs, with 42.04% missing data. Raw Illumina reads are available in the GenBank sequence read archive (SRA) under the BioProject accession XXX. 2.2.4. Population structure For analyses that did not require an outgroup, we performed a de novo assembly of the Storeria dekayi samples. Excluding the outgroup increases the number of shared loci; therefore, we generated additional datasets using different clustering thresholds (Table S1, Supplementary Data), following McCartney-Melstad et al. (2019) . The resulting Variant Call Format (VCF) file was filtered using VCFtools version 0.1.17 (Danecek et al., 2011) to retain only unlinked, biallelic SNPs under the following criteria: --min-alleles 2, --max-alleles 2, --maf 0.1, and --max-missing 0.5. The filtered VCF file was then converted into a .str file for STRUCTURE analysis using the program PGDSpider version 2.1.1.5 ( Lischer and Excoffier, 2012 ). A second filtering was performed without applying the --maf option, since the influence of minor allele frequency (MAF) can affect the assignment of individuals to an ancestral cluster ( Linck and Battey, 2019 ). For this purpose, a file was generated using the --singletons option in VCFtools, which details the location of singletons across individuals. The filtering was then carried out with the criteria: - -min-alleles 2, --max-alleles 2, --exclude-positions, and --max-missing 0.5 to compare the efficiency of both filtering approaches. We implemented two approaches to investigate population structure. The first was based on non-parametric statistics using principal component analysis (PCA) in R with the package SNPrelate ( Zheng et al., 2012 ). Data visualization was performed with the R package tidyverse (version 1.3.0; Wickham et al., 2019 ). The second approach employed a Bayesian clustering algorithm implemented in the program STRUCTURE version 2.3.4 ( Pritchard et al., 2000 ) to determine the optimal number of genetic clusters (K). We ran 10 replicate analyses for each value of K, each with 300,000 generations and discarding the first 100,000 generations as burn-in. The optimal number of clusters (K) was estimated using the method of Evanno et al. (2005) , as implemented in the program Structure Harvester ( Earl and Vonholsdt, 2012 ), which determines the optimal K based on the lnPr(D|K) statistic ( Pritchard et al., 2000 ). Results from the replicate runs were summarized and visualized using CLUMPP version 1.1.2 ( Jakobsson and Rosenberg, 2007 ) and RStudio version 2024.12.1 (R Core Team, 2021). 2.2.5. Phylogenetic analyses Using the identified clustering threshold, we generated a series of assemblies by adjusting the minimum number of samples per locus parameter in ipyrad ( Eaton and Overcast, 2020 ). This parameter defines the minimum number of samples that must have data at a given locus for it to be retained in the final dataset (Table S2). Different data matrices were generated at the selected threshold, evaluating values from 30% to 80% of total number of taxa (in 10% increments) for the minimum number of samples per locus parameter ( Lara-Tufiño et al., 2025 ). We performed concatenated maximum likelihood (ML) analyses of the generated datasets using the software RAxML-NG v.1.2.0 ( Kozlov et al., 2019 ). The concatenated datasets included all loci, including both SNPs and invariant sites to improve branch length estimation and topological precision (Leache et al., 2015). We employed a GTR+Γ model and 100 starting trees (50 random and 50 parsimony) and assessed node support via a non-parametric bootstrap of 100 replicates, executed through CIPRES Sci., Gateway version 3.3 ( Miller et al., 2010 ). Then, to select the optimal tree, the average bootstrap (BS) values for each resulting tree were calculated using the R package ape version 5.7-1 ( Paradis and Schliep, 2019 ) and visualized with the function “boxplot()” in RStudio version 2024.12.1 interface ( RStudio Team, 2020 ). These results are shown in Fig. S3 (Supplementary Data). Phylogenetic trees were visualized and edited using FigTree version 1.4.4 ( Rambaut, 2018 ) and Inkscape version 1.2. 2.2.6. Species tree analyses The STRUCTURE analyses revealed that five samples from Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas (PAN 540, SMOMNH 42677, SMOMNH 42747, and TJL 2304–2305) likely exhibited introgression from the eastern and south-central U.S.A. populations, preventing their assignment to a single ancestral population. Consequently, we performed all subsequent analyses excluding samples with less than 60% assignment to any population, as we suspect that these individuals originated from each of the genetic clusters ( Barley et al., 2024 ; Pang and Zhang, 2024 ). Species trees for genetically distinct populations of Storeria dekayi were inferred using two methods, with samples assigned to putative species based on the results from the ML, STRUCTURE, and PCA analyses. First, we inferred a species tree topology using SVDquartets, implemented in PAUP version 4.0a (Swofford, 2001; Chifman and Kubatko, 2014 ), based on the “.usnps” output file generated by ipyrad, which contains unlinked SNPs. All possible quartets were evaluated, and node support was assessed via bootstrapping with 1,000 replicates. The sample of S. victa was excluded due to poor sequence quality and fewer loci recovered compared to other samples. Next, we estimated a species tree using Bayesian inference in BPP version 4.7 ( Yang, 2015 ; Yang and Rannala, 2010 , 2014 ). We performed two independent species-tree analyses (A01 analysis in BPP), each starting from a different initial topology. Because a larger number of loci showed poor admixture and failed to reach convergence (following Barley et al., 2024 ), a dataset comprising 500 loci was used. This reduced set of loci also helped balance computational demands. According to the results of the STRUCTURE analysis, we excluded individuals with less than 60% of their genetic ancestry derived from a single genetic group to avoid phylogenetic uncertainty arising from the inclusion of potential hybrids ( Pavón-Vazquez et al., 2024 ). Analyses used the “.alleles” file of ipyrad. Population size parameters (θ) were assigned an inverse-gamma prior IG (3, 0.0012), based on the mean uncorrected pairwise genetic distance (p-distance) within taxa. The divergence time at the root of the species tree (t₀) was assigned an inverse-gamma prior IG (3, 0.0303), based on the mean p-distance between the basal-most taxon ( S. occipitomaculata ) and the other taxa. Each analysis was set to take 200,000 samples with a burn-in of 20,000 samples and, a sampling frequency of 10. 2.2.7. Isolation by distance and species delimitation We compared geographic and genetic distances to test for evidence of isolation-by-distance (IBD) using SNP data and the R package BEDASSLE ( Bradburd et al., 2013 ). To calculate a matrix of geographic distances, we used the R package geosphere (Hijmans et al., 2024). For this analysis, samples were assigned to populations based on the results of the STRUCTURE analysis. When groups belong to the same species, then genetic and geographic distances typically exhibit a continuous relationship. In contrast, a discontinuous relationship between genetic and geographic distances, both within and between groups, can be indicative of the presence of distinct species ( Prates et al., 2024 ). We conducted two hierarchical heuristic species delimitation under the MSC-M model including and excluding the five admixed samples, using the program Hierarchical Heuristic Species Delimitations (hhsd) version 0.9.9 (Kornai et al., 2023) to automate the estimation of the genealogical divergence index (gdi) between populations in BPP ( Jackson et al., 2017 ; Leache et al., 2019 ). The species tree topology estimated in the BPP A01 analysis was used as the guide tree for delimitation. Bidirectional migration was allowed between all sister-species pairs in the phylogeny, including historical migration between common ancestors and their sister lineages. The migration rate prior was modeled using a gamma distribution G (0.1, 10), with a mean of 0.01 migrant individuals per generation following Kornai et al. (2023). To estimate species divergence times and population sizes under the multispecies coalescent model, we performed an A00 analysis in BPP version 4.7 ( Yang, 2015 ; Flouri et al., 2018 ). This analysis was based on 500 loci and employed inverse gamma priors for θ (IG (3, 0.0012)) and τ₀ (IG (3, 0.0303)). The posterior means of the parameters obtained from the analysis were then used to calculate the gdi ( Leache et al., 2019 ). 2.2.8. Hybridization To explore the possibility of gene flow as a cause of discordance between the ML and species trees, we used the PhyloNetworks program version 0.17 ( Solís-Lemus et al., 2017 ) to infer phylogenetic networks under the multispecies network coalescent model (MSNC). A SNP assembly (one SNP per locus) was generated in ipyrad, incorporating representatives of S. dekayi and S. sp. from CCB, including samples that exhibited less than 60% total ancestry. Using this assembly, we created a table of quartet-level concordance factors (CF) with the function “SNPs2CF” in R ( Olave and Meyer, 2020 ). The concordance factors and the previously inferred species tree were then used as input for PhyloNetworks to search for phylogenetic networks, allowing a maximum number of reticulation events (hmax) ranging from 0 to 3 ( Myers et al., 2022 ). For each search, 50 independent runs were conducted. To evaluate statistical support for the optimal network, defined as the network with the lowest negative log-likelihood score, we performed a bootstrap analysis with 100 replicates, each consisting of 20 runs. The functions tree Edges Bootstrap and hybrid Bootstrap Support were then used to map bootstrap proportions onto the edges and hybrid nodes of the best network ( Lara-Tufiño et al., 2025 ). 2.2.9. Divergence-time estimation We used the BPP software to estimate divergence times in the S. dekayi complex. We estimated population sizes of contemporary and ancestral populations (θs) and divergence times (τs) on the fixed species tree (A01 analysis in BPP). The same individuals were used as for the species tree analyses, to control for potential gene flow between populations. We also used the same inverse gamma priors for θ and τ0. Analyses were based on 500 loci. We transformed the coalescent times (highest posterior densities [HPDs]) calculated by BPP to geological times (Mya) using the equation t= τ/r ( Angelis and dos Reis, 2015 ; Dos Reis, 2016 ). In this equation, tau is the mean HPD of coalescent times and r is a neutral substitution rate, with a rate for natricids of 8.1x10 -10 substitutions per site per year ( Perry et al., 2018 ). 2.2.10. Morphological comparisons To investigate the morphological differentiation among the lineages identified within the complex using molecular data, we examined eight specimens from the CCB population, 11 specimens of S . dekayi from the U.S.A., and 65 specimens from Mexico and Central America. The list of specimens examined is provided in Table S3. The list of 18 morphological characters examined (16 morphometric, 2 meristic) is given in Table S4. Scale nomenclature followed Trapido (1944) . However, given the lack of variation in scalation among the reviewed specimens (variation was observed only in ventral and subcaudal scales), morphometric measurements of the scales were performed. These were observed using a stereomicroscope, and measurements were taken with a Lenfench digital caliper (0.01 mm precision) and recorded to the nearest 0.1 mm. Counts of ventral and subcaudal scales were also recorded (Table S4). To visualize morphological variation, we performed principal component analyses (PCA) on the data using the PCA function from the R package FactoMineR ( Lê et al., 2008 ). We considered there to be evidence for morphologically distinct species if there was no overlap among putative in the PCA plots from a given pair of PCs, for one or more pairs of axes. 3. Results 3.1. Population structure Filtering of the SNP dataset with the --maf option resulted in, 916 retained unlinked SNPs. The results obtained with STRUCTURE and SNPRelate are summarized in Figure 2 . In the second filtering, where singletons were excluded, a matrix comprising 1,998 SNPs was obtained, and the corresponding PCA and STRUCTURE results are presented in Figure S4. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. A. Population structure in Storeria dekayi inferred by means of Principal Component Analysis. Dots represent different individuals, colored by cluster. The five dots enclosed by the dashed line are highly admixed individuals from U.S.A. B. Population structure in Storeria dekayi inferred by STRUCTURE. Each vertical bar in the barplots represents an individual. K = 2 is the optimal K obtained with the delta K method, and K = 5 is the optimal K obtained with the ln Pr(D|k) method. The analyses of both datasets yielded, similar patterns of structure among individuals. Using the ΔK method, the optimal value of K for the dataset filtered with the –maf option peaked at two (ΔK = 3,521.0559; Fig. S5A), whereas the dataset excluding singletons also yielded an optimal value of K of two (ΔK = 6,367.0741; Fig. S5C). In contrast, the ln Pr(D|K) method indicated an optimal value of K of five for both datasets (Figs. S5B, S5D). The five clusters consisted of the samples from: (1) Mexico and Central America, (2) CCB, (3) south-central U.S.A. (Arkansas, Texas, Oklahoma), (4) eastern U.S.A. (Georgia, New York), and (5) the samples displaying high admixture. The south-central U.S.A. group exhibited high admixture among different clusters at K = 3–5. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the RADseq data segregated the samples into three distinct clusters, corresponding to S. dekayi from: (1) Mexico and Central America, (2) eastern U.S.A., and (3) south-central U.S.A. The CCB haplotypes clustered with the highly admixed samples ( Fig 2A ). In the PCA, the first three PCs together explained 52.49% of the total variance, with PC1, PC2, and PC3 explaining 37.67%, 10.16%, and 4.66% of this variance, respectively. 3.2. Phylogenetic analysis Our ML analysis of the concatenated data ( Fig. 3 ) showed that S. dekayi and the CCB samples formed a strongly supported monophyletic group that the sister taxon to S. victa . Within the S. dekayi clade, the sampled populations from the eastern U.S.A. are sister taxon to all other S. dekayi populations plus the S . sp. CCB samples. The samples from south-central U.S.A., including five admixed individuals from south-central U.S.A., were paraphyletic with respect to the sister clades with the samples from Mexico and Central America and the CCB. Many of the relationships among the S. dekayi populations from south-central U.S.A. are strongly supported (BS >90%), including those showing the south-central U.S.A. populations to be paraphyletic. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. A. Geographic distribution of population structure in Storeria dekayi inferred with STRUCTURE. Each pie represents an individual, with multiple colors indicating mixed ancestry. Note the presence of five highly admixed individuals (“Admixed”) from U.S.A. enclosed by a dashed line. B. Phylogenetic tree for Storeria estimated with RAxML with a clustering threshold of 90% and minimum percentage of samples with data per locus = 40%. Numbers on nodes are bootstrap support (bs) values. Nodes with bs > 70 are considered well supported ( Hillis and Bull, 1993 ). 3.3. Species tree analysis In the species tree generated by SVDquartets ( Fig. 4A ), the five admixed samples were excluded, and the remaining individuals were assigned to putative species based on the clades recovered in the ML tree, the STRUCTURE results, and clusters in the PCA results. In the SVDquartets tree, S. dekayi from south-central U.S.A. formed the sister group to the lineage from the CCB, although this relationship was weakly supported (bootstrap support [BS] = 55). Together, these two groups formed the sister clade to S. dekayi from Mexico and Central America (BS = 100), and all of these taxa comprised the sister taxon to S. dekayi from eastern U.S.A. (BS = 100). However, we recognize that it is potentially problematic to treat the samples from south-central U.S.A. as a clade. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. Species tree analyses. A. Species tree for Storeria estimated with SVDquartets from a ddRADseq dataset of unlinked SNPs assembled with a clustering threshold of 90%. Numbers indicate bootstrap support values. B. Species tree for Storeria estimated with BPP. Numbers on nodes represent posterior probabilities from the BPP A01 analyses. The species tree inferred with BPP ( Fig. 4B ) is congruent with the topology recovered by SVDquartets. However, the relationship between the south-central U.S.A. samples and those from the CCB was strongly supported, with a posterior probability of 1. Again, we recognize that it is potentially problematic to treat the samples from south-central U.S.A. as a clade. 3.4. Isolation-by-distance (IBD) and species delimitation The IBD analysis suggests that S. dekayi represents more than one distinct species. The genetic distances estimated within and among samples assigned to different groups from various geographic locations are discontinuous, with genetic differentiation being largely independent of geographic separation ( Fig. 5 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 5. Pairwise genetic distance (FST) between individuals assigned to the established populations, with gray representing FST within populations and black representing FST between different populations, as a function of the geographic distances among them. The relationship between genetic and geographic distances within and among groups is expected to be discontinuous in the presence of distinct species. The gdi values calculated from the parameters estimated by BPP ( Fig. 6A ), excluding admixed samples, suggest that the lineages from CCB and S. dekayi from Mexico and Central America each represent a distinct species (gdi = 0.997 and 0.873, respectively), whereas the eastern and south-central U.S.A. lineages fall within the zone of ambiguity (gdi = 0.338 and 0.265, respectively). In contrast, the estimates including admixed samples ( Fig. 6B ) indicate that only CCB represents an independent evolutionary lineage (gdi = 0.871), whereas the S. dekayi lineages from Mexico and Central America and from the eastern U.S.A. fall within the zone of ambiguity (gdi = 0.673 and 0.296, respectively). The south-central U.S.A. lineage falls below the 0.2 threshold (gdi = 0.068). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 6. Heuristic genealogical divergence index (gdi) values for Storeria occipitomaculata and putative species within S. dekayi . The gdis were calculated using the estimates for population sizes (theta) and divergence times (tau) from the analysis of 500 loci in BPP. The tree from a BPP 01 analysis was used as guide tree. Gdi values between gdi = 0.2 and gdi = 0.7 (dotted lines) indicate that species delimitation in this interval is ambiguous. A. gdi values excluding highly admixed samples. B. gdi values including highly admixed samples. Starting from a five-population species tree ( S. occipitomaculata , eastern U.S.A., south-central U.S.A., Mexico and Central America, and CCB), and excluding the highly admixed samples, the hhsd approach supported the recognition of five species, with a high migration rate (M = 0.190; Table S5) observed between the eastern U.S.A. and south-central U.S.A. lineages. In contrast, the split algorithm suggested that the entire S. dekayi complex should be considered a single species, with a high migration rate (M = 0.106; Table S6) between eastern U.S.A. and the combined group of populations from Mexico and Central America, CCB, and south-central U.S.A. On the other hand, when including the highly admixed samples and starting from the same five-population species tree ( S. occipitomaculata , eastern U.S.A., south-central U.S.A., Mexico and Central America, and CCB), the merge algorithm of hhsd recognized two distinct lineages within the S. dekayi complex: the eastern U.S.A. lineage and a combined group from Mexico and Central America, CCB, and south-central U.S.A. The split algorithm recovered the same lineages, and both algorithms showed high migration rates (merge M = 0.174; split M = 0.175; Tables S7 and S8. respectively) from the eastern U.S.A. populations to the group composed of Mexico and Central America, CCB, and south-central U.S.A. 3.5. Hybridization Phylonetworks analyses revealed that all models involving reticulation events (h > 0) fit the data better than models based on strictly bifurcating trees (h = 0). Negative pseudolikelihood scores decreased from h = 0 to h = 1 and remained essentially unchanged, or showed only minimal improvement, for h > 1 (Fig. S6), suggesting that the best-fitting phylogenetic model includes a single introgression event. This network indicates an introgression event from S. dekayi from south-central U.S.A. into those from eastern U.S.A., with an inheritance probability of 33.3% (γ = 0.333; Fig. 7 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 7. Phylogenetic network inferred by PhyloNetworks with hmax=1. Bootstrap values are based on 100 bootstrap replicates. The blue arrow indicates an inferred hybridization event and its direction. Red and blue numbers are the estimated proportions of genes (heritabilities) contributed by the major and minor hybrid edges, respectively, to the hybrid taxon. Black numbers are bootstrap support values for the non-hybrid nodes, and purple numbers are bootstrap support values for the major and minor parent edges of the hybrid taxon. 3.6. Divergence-time estimation The split between S . occipitomaculata and the S . dekayi complex ( Fig. 8 ; Table 2 ) was estimated at approximately 21.67 Mya (Node A; 95% HPD = 15.35–28.24). Within the S . dekayi complex, the earliest divergence occurred around 5.46 Mya (Node B; 95% HPD = 3.91–7.11), separating the eastern U.S.A. lineage from the clade comprising Mexico and Central America, south-central U.S.A. and S . sp. CCB. Subsequently, the divergence between the Mexican and Central American populations and the south-central U.S.A. and S . sp. CCB populations was estimated at 2.69 Mya (Node C; 95% HPD = 1.84–3.58). Finally, the split between the south-central U.S.A. populations of S . dekayi and S . sp. CCB was estimated at 2.40 Mya (Node D; 95% HPD = 1.64–3.24). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 8. Divergence time estimates from Multi Species Coalescent A00 analysis in BPP. Node labels correspond to those in Table 4. Node A: divergence between S . occipitomaculata and the S . dekayi complex. Node B: divergence between S . dekayi from eastern U.S.A. and S. dekayi from Mexico and Central America + S. sp. CCB + S. dekayi from south-central U.S.A. Node C: divergence between S. dekayi from Mexico and Central America and S. sp. CCB + S. dekayi from south-central U.S.A. Node D: divergence time between S. sp. CCB and S. dekayi from south-central U.S.A. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 2. Estimated divergence times using BPP. Node labels correspond to those in Fig. 8 . 3.7. Morphological comparisons Biplots of the first three principal components (PCs; Fig. 9 ) explained 70.83% of the total variation in the morphological characters (Table S9): the first (53.14% of variation) mainly represented variation in head length, mandible length, and maximum parietal scale length; the second (9.99% of variation) represented variation in the number of ventral and subcaudal scales and vertical eye diameter; and the third (7.69% of variation) was represented by the number of subcaudal scales and total length. The populations from CCB were fully separated from those in eastern and south-central U.S.A. along PC2 ( Fig. 9A ), but all three sets of populations were largely overlapping with those from Mexico and Central America on this axis. On PC1, there was both some separation and some overlap between populations from CCB, eastern U.S.A., and south-central U.S.A. and those from Mexico and Central America ( Fig. 9A, B ), Populations were largely overlapping on PC3 ( Fig. 9B, C ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 9. Results of PCA of morphological data. A) Biplot visualization of PC axes 1 and 2 and variable factor map illustrating variable loadings for PC axes 1 and 2. B) Biplot visualization of PC axes 1 and 3 and variable factor map illustrating variable loadings for PC axes 1 and 3. C) Biplot visualization of PC axes 2 and 3 and variable factor map illustrating variable loadings for PC axes 2 and 3. 4. Discussion Our analyses of RADseq and morphological data suggest that the S. dekayi complex consists of multiple lineages, but the number of lineages that are distinct varies across analyses. Our STRUCTURE and PCA analyses of the RADseq data ( Fig. 2 ) suggest that populations from Mexico and Central America are distinct from all others. Phylogenetic analyses of the concatenated RADseq data show that populations from Mexico and Central America form a strongly supported clade that is sister to the populations from the Cuatro Cienegas Basin (CCB), but that this clade is nested among populations from the eastern and south-central U.S.A. ( Fig. 3 ). Species-tree analyses show the CCB population as sister to those from south-central U.S.A. ( Fig. 4 ), with populations from Mexico and Central America and eastern U.S.A. as successive outgroups. Analyses using the gdi approach suggest that populations from CCB and those from Mexico and Central America are distinct species ( Fig. 6 ). Morphological analyses show that populations from CCB and those from eastern and south-central U.S.A. are distinct from each other, but not from those in Mexico and Central America ( Fig. 9 ). Overall, given the conflicts among these results, we tentatively recognize only two species: the CCB lineage and Storeria dekayi , which includes all remaining populations from the U.S.A., Mexico, and Central America. 4.1. Phylogenetic relationships, population structure and gene flow The phylogenetic relationships among Storeria species recovered in this study are consistent with previous species-level studies ( Pyron et al., 2016 ; Nuñez et al., 2023 ), which identified S. dekayi as the sister group to S. victa . However, our focus here was on relationships within S. dekayi , especially those populations from Mexico and Central America. Our ddRADseq-based analyses revealed that S. dekayi is paraphyletic with respect to S. sp. CCB, which is congruent with previous findings from mitochondrial data ( García-Vazquez, 2020 ; Vite-Hernandez, 2023 ). Similar patterns involving endemic taxa from Cuatro Cienegas have been observed in other reptiles (e.g., Terrapene coahuila , Gerrhonotus mccoyi and Scincella kikaapoa ), suggesting historical isolation followed by secondary contact ( Scheinvar et al., 2020 ; Blair et al., 2022 ) or paraphyly of the ancestors of the CCB endemics (e.g., S. dekayi ) due to incomplete lineage sorting. The STRUCTURE and PCA analyses of the RADseq data revealed three main clusters in the S. dekayi complex ( Fig. 2 ): one from the eastern U.S.A., another from south-central U.S.A., and a third from Mexico and Central America. However, there was clearly admixture between populations from eastern and south-central U.S.A., based on the PCA and STRUCTURE analyses (with K=3, 4, and 5) Subsequently, four groups were used as hypotheses in the species-tree analyses given that the CCB population was differentiated in the ML analyses and in STRUCTURE analyses with K=4 and 5. In the resulting species-tree estimates, the south-central U.S.A. samples were placed as the sister group to the CCB species ( Fig. 4 ). By contrast, in the concatenated ML tree ( Fig. 3B ), the eastern U.S.A. samples were strongly supported as the sister taxon to the other S. dekayi populations, the south-central U.S.A. populations were strongly supported as being paraphyletic with respect to the Mexican populations, and the population from CCB was strongly supported as sister to the populations from eastern Mexico and Central America. The discrepancy between the species trees and ML tree may be attributed to limited geographic sampling which can create the appearance of distinct genetic groups ( Barley et al., 2018 ). As Chambers and Hillis (2020) noted, restricted sampling combined with a strong conflicting signal of introgression can lead to an overestimation of the number of distinct lineages by several methods such as BPP or STRUCTURE. In our case, the results may reflect high admixture among genetic groups (as seen in STRUCTURE; Fig. 2A ), historical introgression (which can mislead phylogenetic inference; Esquerre et al., 2019 ), or incomplete lineage sorting. The group formed by the samples from the south-central U.S.A. includes individuals with genetic contributions from the eastern U.S.A. populations, which may be due to a zone of overlap between populations or an area of intergradation that indicates intraspecific variation ( Hillis et al., 2021 ). This may explain the paraphyly of the south-central U.S.A. populations with respect to the clade of CCB and the Mexican and Central American populations in the ML tree ( Fig. 3 ), as any degree of hybridization between species can lead to paraphyly ( Hillis, 2022 ). A broader sampling effort in the contact zones between the eastern and south-central U.S.A. populations would help clarify the relationships between them, whether they represent a case of failed speciation with two populations experiencing widespread gene flow ( Schield et al., 2015 ) or a “genetic sink” that restricts gene flow between species ( Yanchukov et al., 2006 ; Chambers and Hillis, 2020 ). Moreover, genomic data can reveal evidence of introgression over time ( San Jose et al., 2023 ). Our PhyloNetworks results suggested a hybridization event in which S. dekayi populations from the eastern U.S.A. received approximately one-third of their genomes (γ = 0.333) from the populations from the south-central U.S.A. (but note that this is based on only a sampling of the genome from RADseq data). A similar pattern was inferred between the snakes Lampropeltis gentilis and L . annulata ( Ruane et al., 2014 ). The geographically structured distribution of genetic variation observed in the STRUCTURE analysis is not unexpected, given the large geographic distances between populations. Additionally, the apparent lack of admixture between the lineages from Mexico and Central America and the U.S.A. could reflect a failure to sample intermediate populations in southern Texas, potentially leading to an overestimation of species diversity, as seen in the eastern and south-central U.S.A. populations. Therefore, an IBD analysis was used to determine whether geographic isolation alone is limiting gene flow. The genetic and geographic distances, both within and between lineages, showed a discontinuous pattern, and genetic distance is independent of geographic distance ( Fig. 5 ). This result may indicate mechanisms that restrict gene flow, such as reproductive isolation, supporting species delimitation and aligning with expectations of evolutionary divergence ( Prates et al., 2024 ). We also note that within the Mexico-Central America clade, the sister to all other populations is from Guatemala, not the populations adjacent to Texas in Tamaulipas ( Fig. 3B ). 4.2. Species limits and taxonomy We found substantial genetic divergence among populations traditionally referred to as Storeria dekayi . Historical morphological assessments distinguished Mexican and Central American populations from other populations based on characters such as the presence or absence of a black temporal line, a U-shaped orbital mark, and differences in ventral scale counts ( Trapido, 1944 ; Anderson, 1961 ). However, Sabath and Sabath (1969) noted the difficulty of identifying S. dekayi subspecies due to morphological overlap and potential hybridization, an observation corroborated here by the shared genetic variation and evidence of admixture among lineages. Storeria sp. CCB is morphologically distinguished from S. dekayi by its smaller size, lower number of ventral and subcaudal scales, and unique coloration pattern ( Vite-Hernandez, 2023 ). As noted by Trapido (1944) , there is a tendency for southern populations to have a higher number of ventral scales, which is consistent with the specimens examined here from Mexico and Central America ( S. dekayi south-central U.S.A. ( n =8): 123–142, x̅ = 133.00; S. dekayi eastern U.S.A. (n =3): 126–137, x̅ = 133.00; S. sp. CCB ( n =8): 129–137, x̅ = 133.25; S. dekayi Mexico and Central America ( n =65): 119–149, x̅ = 137.49). Nevertheless, further morphological analyses are warranted to identify consistent diagnostic traits among these lineages. Based on gdi values ( Fig. 6 ), only the CCB lineage was genetically distinct enough to be considered evolutionarily independent (gdi > 0.7), whereas the populations from Mexico and eastern U.S.A. fell within the ambiguity zone. The populations from south-central U.S.A. lineage were below the 0.2 threshold, suggesting that they are not a distinct species (Leache et al., 2017). Leache et al. (2019) identified two limitations of the gdi metric: (1) it may yield discordant species assessments between sister lineages with differing levels of genetic diversity, and (2) its estimates are sensitive to θ values (population sizes), with higher values in lineages exhibiting low intraspecific variation. The CCB lineage, being narrowly distributed, likely achieved genetic distinctiveness more rapidly, whereas the ambiguous (lower) gdi values for the populations from the eastern and south-central U.S.A. may reflect their broader distributions and thus larger effective population size. The paraphyly of the south-central U.S.A. populations with respect to the eastern U.S.A. populations observed in the concatenated ML analysis ( Fig. 3B ) may be due (in part) to admixture between these lineages. However, the strongly supported paraphyly of the south-central U.S.A. populations may also represent incomplete lineage sorting. It is well known that diverging sister species go through a life cycle in which alleles are initially polyphyletic, then paraphyletic, and then monophyletic, with the speed of these transitions depending on the population size (e.g. Rosenberg, 2003 ). Thus, it is unsurprising that the widely distributed S. dekayi populations in North America remain paraphyletic, whereas the more narrowly distributed lineages in Cuatro Cienegas and in eastern Mexico and Central America have each become monophyletic. We consider it unlikely that the paraphyletic series of lineages in south-central U.S.A. represent additional cryptic lineages, given that the putative cryptic species do not appear to be geographically coherent. The discrepancy between the results given by the merge and split algorithms in hhsd ( Kornai et al., 2024 ) may be due to the broad uncertainty interval in the gdi (0.2 < gdi < 0.7) and the high migration rate between the south-central U.S.A. and eastern U.S.A. populations. Taken together, our results support the recognition of two or possibly three distinct species. One of these is the undescribed species of Storeria endemic to the Cuatro Cienegas Basin. Based on our analyses here, this species was supported as a distinct lineage based on gdi ( Fig. 6 ), STRUCTURE analyses (with K=4 and 5; Fig. 2 ), and concatenated ML analyses ( Fig. 3 ). It was also morphologically distinct from populations in eastern and south-central U.S.A. based on PCA of the morphological data ( Fig. 9 ). In addition, it exhibits a set of unique characteristics that distinguish it from other Storeria species, including body size and color pattern, as well as its restricted distribution in the wetlands of the CCB region surrounded by desert ( Vite-Hernandez, 2023 ). Storeria dekayi is tentatively considered a single, widely distributed species. We think that there is little evidence to suggest that populations from eastern and south-central U.S.A. represent distinct species, since there appears to be extensive hybridization between them ( Figs. 2 , 3), given that the south-central populations do not form a monophyletic group ( Fig. 3 ), and given the non-significant gdi results ( Fig. 6 ). On the other hand, there is far more evidence for recognizing the populations from Mexico and Central America as distinct. These populations form a distinct cluster in the STRUCTURE and PCA of the RADseq data ( Fig. 2 ), are strongly supported as monophyletic in the concatenated ML analyses ( Fig. 3 ), and in the gdi analyses are significantly supported as distinct species ( Fig. 6A ) or are almost significantly supported ( Fig. 6B ). We did find morphological overlap between the populations from Mexico and Central America and other populations in the morphological PCA ( Fig. 9 ), but this merely indicates that these populations may represent a (semi-) morphologically cryptic species. Overall, we think that there is ample evidence to recognize populations of S. dekayi from Mexico and Central America as a distinct species (for which the name S. tropica ) is available. Although one could argue that more sampling is needed in the unsampled area between the Mexican and U.S. populations in northern Mexico ( Fig. 3 ), it is not clear if S. dekayi occurs there. The apparent paraphyly of Storeria dekayi may be due to the fact that our sampling did not include representatives of all described subspecies. A more comprehensive assessment will require broader geographic sampling. Therefore, we tentatively recognize only two species: S. dekayi and the distinct lineage from Cuatro Cienegas. 4.3. Divergence times Divergence time estimates from BPP suggest that the separation of populations in eastern and south-central U.S.A. occurred during the Pleistocene, possibly driven by an interglacial eluviation event that expanded the Mississippi River floodplain ( Thornbury, 1965 , Soltis et al., 2006 ). The Mississippi River has been recognized as a major phylogeographic barrier in numerous taxa ( Lemmon et al., 2007 ; Burbrink et al., 2008 ; Pyron et al., 2009). Divergence between the Mexico-Central America lineage and the south-central U.S.A. population may have occurred during the late Pliocene to early Pleistocene, associated with the establishment of the Rio Grande drainage system ( Gustavson, 1991 ). The split between the CCB and the south-central U.S.A. lineages also dates from the Pleistocene, a period conducive to range shifts and episodic gene flow due to glacial cycles and forest expansions and retractions ( Bryson et al., 2011 ). These climatic fluctuations over the past 2.5 million years played a significant role in shaping species distributions and genetic diversity in North America ( Gamez and Castellanos-Morales, 2019 ; Scheinvar et al., 2020 ). Populations were reduced and confined to Pleistocene refugia, where genetic drift and local adaptation promoted divergence ( Myers et al., 2019 ). Upon climate amelioration, range expansions from different refugia led to secondary contact, increasing intrapopulation variation and producing complex genetic patterns ( Myers et al., 2019 ). These refugia—documented in many taxa—are recognized as reservoirs of genetic diversity ( Morafka, 1977 ; Metcalf, 1977 ; Elias et al., 1995 ; Contreras-Balderas et al., 2007 ). Cuatro Cienegas is one such refugium and has been identified as a key genetic diversity reservoir for North American biota ( Gamez and Castellanos-Morales, 2019 ). We note that our estimate for the age of Storeria is substantially older than other recent estimates that incorporate broad species sampling and multiple fossil calibration. For example, Zheng and Wiens (2016) estimated that S. occipitomaculata and S. dekayi diverged 9.11 Mya, and that all North American natricines were only 15 Myr old (crown-group age). Here, we estimated that S. occipitomaculata and S. dekayi diverged 21.67 Mya ( Table 2 ). Nuñez et al. (2023) estimated the crown-group age of North American natricines at 21.57 Mya, with the crown-group age of Storeria <3 Mya. Thus, the ages estimated here should be taken with much caution, because they lack external fossil calibrations. Author contribution: CRediT Victor Gabriel Castillo-Sanchez: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Research, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Adrian Nieto-Montes de Oca: Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. John J. Wiens: Funding acquisition, Validation, Writing – review & editing. Marysol Trujano-Ortega: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. Uri O. García-Vazquez: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Acknowledgements This paper serves as a fulfillment of VGCS for obtaining a M.Sc. degree in the Posgrado en Ciencias Biólogicas from Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico. We thank the SECIHTI for funding and for the support of this research through a graduate scholarship to VGCS (CVU 1249510). Support for fieldwork was provided by grants from DGAPA, UNAM (PAPIIT-IN 218022 and PAPIME PE208422) to U. O. García-Vazquez, and Richard Glider Graduate School (Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Fund) to VGCS. MTO thanks the support from SECIHTI (Estancias Posdoctorales por Mexico para la Formación y Consolidación de las y los Investigadores por Mexico; CVU131802). For tissue and specimen loans we thank the following institutions: Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, University of Oklahoma, Museo de Zoología FES Zaragoza, UNAM, UTA Amphibian and Reptile Diversity Research Center, American Museum of Natural History, Texas Natural History Collections, Instituto Tecnológico de Huejutla, University of Florida, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute Herpetology Collection, Museo de Zoología Facultad de Ciencias UNAM. We thank C. Grünwald, A. E. Valdenegro-Brito, J. C. Sanchez-García, A. Garcia-Vinalay for assistance in the field and for donating several samples; and R. G. Martínez-Fuentes, J. C. Sanchez-García, D. I. Sanchez-Aguilar, A. E. Valdenegro-Brito, A. García-Vinalay, N. N. Avila-Jimenez, and A. Vite-Hernandez for their help with laboratory work. All contributors observed state, federal, and international laws concerning the collection and transport of live or preserved specimens. All specimens of Mexico were collected under a collecting permit provided by the Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (permit number FAUT-0243) to U. O. García-Vazquez. Funder Information Declared Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico References ↵ Anderson , P.K ., 1961 . Variation in populations of Brown Snakes, genus Storeria , bordering the Gulf of Mexico . Am. Midl. Nat . 66 , 235 – 249 . doi: 10.2307/2422879 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Angelis , K. , Dos Reis , M ., 2015 . The impact of ancestral population size and incomplete lineage sorting on Bayesian estimation of species divergence times . Curr. Zool . 61 , 874 – 885 . doi: 10.1093/czoolo/61.5.874 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Arcila , D. , Ortí , G. , Vari , R. , Armbruster , J.W. , Stiassny , M.L. , Ko , K.D. , Sabaj , M.H. , Lundberg , J. , Revell , L. J. , Betancur-R , R ., 2017 . Genome-wide interrogation advances resolution of recalcitrant groups in the tree of life . Nat. Ecol. and Evol . 1 , 0020 . doi: 10.1038/s41559-016-0020 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Barley , A.J. , Brown , J.M. , Thomson , R.C ., 2018 . Impact of model violations on the inference of species boundaries under the multispecies coalescent . Syst. Biol . 67 , 269 – 284 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syx073 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Barley , A. J. , Nieto-Montes de Oca , A. , Manríquez-Moran , N.L. , Thomson , R.C. , 2024 . Understanding species boundaries that arise from complex histories: gene flow across the speciation continuum in the spotted whiptail lizards . Syst. Biol . 73 , 901 – 919 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syae040 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Bickford , D. , Lohman , D.J. , Sodhi , N.S. , Ng , P.K. , Meier , R. , Winker , K. , Ingram , K.K. , Das , I ., 2007 . Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation . Trends in Ecol. and Evol . 22 , 148 – 155 . doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.004 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Blair , C. , Bryson Jr , R.W. , García-Vazquez , U.O. , Nieto-Montes de Oca , A. , Lazcano , D. , Mccormack , J.E. , Klicka , J. , 2022 . Phylogenomics of alligator lizards elucidate diversification patterns across the Mexican Transition Zone and support the recognition of a new genus . Biol. J. of the Linn. Soc . 135 , 25 – 39 . doi: 10.1093/biolinnean/blab139 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Bradburd , G. , Bradburd , M. G. , 2013 . Package ‘BEDASSLE’ . Comprehensive R Archive Network . Brandley , M.C. , Wang , Y. , Guo , X. , Nieto-Montes de Oca , A. , Feria-Ortiz , M. , Hikida , T. , Ota , H. , 2011 . Accommodating heterogenous rates of evolution in molecular divergence dating methods: an example using intercontinental dispersal of Plestiodon ( Eumece s) lizards . Syst. Biol . 60 , 3 – 15 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq045 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Bryson Jr , R.W. , Murphy , R.W. , Graham , M.R. , Lathrop , A. , Lazcano , D. , 2011 . Ephemeral Pleistocene woodlands connect the dots for highland rattlesnakes of the Crotalus intermedius group . J. of Biogeogr . 38 , 2299 – 2310 . doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02565.x OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Burbrink , F.T. , Fontanella , F. , Pyron , R.A. , Guiher , T.J. , Jimenez , C ., 2008 . Phylogeography across a continent: the evolutionary and demographic history of the North American racer (Serpentes: Colubridae: Coluber constrictor ) . Mol. Phylogenet. and Evol . 47 , 274 – 288 . doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.10.020 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Burriel-Carranza , B. , Tejero-Cicuendez , H. , Carne , A. , Mochales-Riaño , G. , Talavera , A. , Al Saadi , S. , Els , J. , Smíd J. , Tamar , K. , Tarroso , P. , Carranza , S. , 2025 . Integrating genomics and biogeography to unravel the origin of a mountain biota: The case of a reptile endemicity hotspot in Arabia . Syst. Biol. syae 032 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syae032 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Chambers , E.A. , Hillis , D.M ., 2020 . The multispecies coalescent over-splits species in the case of geographically widespread taxa . Syst. Biol . 69 , 184 – 193 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syz042 OpenUrl CrossRef Chen , X. , Lemmon , A.R. , Lemmon , E.M. , Pyron , R.A. , Burbrink , F.T ., 2017 . Using phylogenomics to understand the link between biogeographic origins and regional diversification in ratsnakes . Mol. Phylogenet. and Evol . 111 , 206 – 218 . doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.03.017 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Chifman , J. , Kubatko , L ., 2014 . Quartet inference from SNP data under the coalescent model . Bioinform . 30 , 3317 – 3324 . doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu530 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Contreras-Balderas , A.J. , Hafner , D.J. , Lopez-Soto , J.H. , Torres-Ayala , J.M. , Contreras-Arquieta , S ., 2007 . Mammals of the Cuatro Cienegas Basin, Coahuila, Mexico . Southwest. Nat . 52 , 400 – 409 . doi: 10.1894/0038-4909(2007)52[400:MOTCCB]2.0.CO;2 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Cope , E.D ., 1885 . Twelfth contribution to the herpetology of tropical America . Proc. of the Am. Philos. Soc . 22 , 167 – 194 [1884]. https://www.jstor.org/stable/982675 OpenUrl ↵ Cox , C.L. , Davis Rabosky , A.R ., 2013 . Spatial and temporal drivers of phenotypic diversity in polymorphic snakes . Am. Nat . 182 , E40 – E57 . doi: 10.1086/670988 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Dos Reis ., 2016 . How to calibrate coalescent trees to geological time . https://dosreislab.github.io/2016/07/03/coalescent-calibration.html (accessed 15 November 2024). ↵ Dugès , A. , 1888 . Description of Storeria dekayi, var. anomala . Proc. of the U. S. Natl. Mus. 10 , 9 . doi: 10.5479/si.00963801.11-678.9 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Earl , D.A. , VonHoldt , B.M ., 2012 . STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method . Conserv. Genet. Resour . 4 , 359 – 361 . doi: 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Eaton , D.A. , Overcast , I ., 2020 . ipyrad: Interactive assembly and analysis of RADseq datasets . Bioinform . 36 , 2592 – 2594 . doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz966 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Edgar , R.C ., 2004 . MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput . Nucleic Acids Research 32 , 1792 – 1797 . doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Elias , S.A. , Van Devender , T.R. , De Baca , R ., 1995 . Insect fossil evidence of late glacial and Holocene environments in the Bolson de Mapimi, Chihuahuan Desert, Mexico: comparisons with the paleobotanical record . Palaios , 454 – 464 . doi: 10.2307/3515047 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Esquerre , D. , Ramírez-Alvarez , D. , Pavón-Vazquez , C.J. , Troncoso-Palacios , J. , Garín , C.F. , Keogh , J.S. , Leache , A.D ., 2019 . Speciation across mountains: phylogenomics, species delimitation and taxonomy of the Liolaemus leopardinus clade (Squamata, Liolaemidae) . Mol. Phylogenet. and Evol . 139 , 106524 . doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106524 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Evanno , G. , Regnaut , S. , Goudet , J ., 2005 . Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study . Mol. Ecol . 14 , 2611 – 2620 . doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Fišer , C. , Robinson , C.T. , Malard , F ., 2018 . Cryptic species as a window into the paradigm shift of the species concept . Mol. Ecol . 27 , 613 – 635 . doi: 10.1111/mec.14486 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Flouri T. , Jiao X. , Rannala B. , Yang Z ., 2018 . Species tree inference with BPP using genomic sequences and the multispecies coalescent . Mol. Biol. and Evol . 35 , 2585 – 2593 . doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy147 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Alvarez F. and Ojeda M. Gamez , N. , Castellanos-Morales , G. , 2019 . Evaluating the hypothesis of Pleistocene refugia for mammals in the Cuatro Cienegas Basin . In Alvarez F. and Ojeda M. (Eds.), Animal Diversity and Biogeography of the Cuatro Cienegas Basin (pp. 203 – 224 ), Springer Cham .. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-11262-2_15 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ García-Vazquez , U.O. , 2020 . Origen y evolución de especies de reptiles endemicas al Valle de Cuatro Cienegas, Coahuila, Mexico . Tesis doctoral. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico , Mexico . ↵ García-Vazquez , U.O. , Canseco-Marquez , L. , Nieto Montes de Oca , A. , 2010 . A new species of Scincella (Squamata: Scincidae) from the Cuatro Cienegas Basin, Coahuila, Mexico . Copeia 2010 , 373 – 381 . doi: 10.1643/CH-09-045 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ García-Vazquez , U.O. , Contreras-Arquieta , A. , Trujano-Ortega , M. , Nieto Montes de Oca , A. , 2018 . A new species of Gerrhonotus (Squamata: Anguidae) from the Cuatro Cienegas Basin, Coahuila, Mexico . Herpetol . 74 , 269 – 278 . doi: 10.1655/HERPETOL.,-D-17-00013 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Alvarez F. and Ojeda M García-Vazquez , U.O. , Trujano-Ortega , M. , Contreras-Arquieta , A. , Avalos-Hernandez , O. , Escobedo-Correa , O. , Corcuera , P ., 2019 . Diversity of Amphibians and Reptiles in the Cuatro Cienegas Basin . In Alvarez F. and Ojeda M . (Eds.), Animal Diversity and Biogeography of the Cuatro Cienegas Basin (pp. 175 – 188 ). Springer , Cham . doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-11262-2_13 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Gustavson , T.C ., 1991 . Arid basin depositional system and paleosol: Fort Hancock and Camp Rice Formation (Pliocene-Pleistocene), Hueco Bolson, West Texas and adjacent Mexico. Bureau of Economic Geology , Report of Investigation , 198 . ↵ Hay , O.P ., 1892 . Descriptions of a supposed new species of Storeria from Florida , Storeria victa. Sci . 19 , 199 . doi: 10.1126/Sci.,.ns-19.479.199 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Hending , D . 2025 . Cryptic species conservation: a review . Biol. Rev . 100 , 258 – 274 . doi: 10.1111/brv.13139 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Hickerson , M.J. , Meyer , C.P. , Moritz , C ., 2006 . DNA barcoding will often fail to discover new animal species over broad parameter space . Syst. Biol . 55 , 729 – 739 . doi: 10.1080/10635150600969898 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Hijmans , R.J. , Williams , E. , Vennes , C ., 2017 . Package ‘geosphere’ . Sph. Trigonometry , 1 , 1 – 45 . OpenUrl ↵ Hillis , D.M. , Bull J.J ., 1993 . An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis . Syst. Biol . 42 , 182 – 192 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/42.2.182 OpenUrl CrossRef Web of Science ↵ Hillis , D.M. , Chambers , E.A. , Devitt , T.J ., 2021 . Contemporary methods and evidence for species delimitation . Ichthyol. and Herpetol . 109 , 895 – 903 . doi: 10.1643/h2021082 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Hillis , D.M ., 2022 . Species, clades, and their relationship to paraphyly and monophyly: Examples from the Pantherophis obsoletus complex . Herpetol. Rev . 53 , 47 – 53 . OpenUrl ↵ J. Dobson Holbrook , J.E. “1836” probably 1839 . North American herpetology; or, a description of the reptiles inhabiting the United States . First edition, Volume 1 ( 2nd version ). J. Dobson , Philadelphia , viii, 9 – 132 p. OpenUrl ↵ Jackson , N.D. , Carstens , B.C. , Morales , A.E. , O’Meara , B.C ., 2017 . Species delimitation with gene flow . Syst. Biol . 66 , 799 – 812 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw117 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Jakobsson , M. , Rosenberg , N.A ., 2007 . CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure . Bioinform . 23 , 1801 – 1806 . doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Jenkins , T.L ., 2024 . mapmixture: An R package and web app for spatial visualisation of admixture and population structure . Mol. Ecol. Resources 24 , e13943 . doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13943 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Kornai , D. , Flouri , T. , Yang , Z ., 2024 . Hierarchical heuristic species delimitation under the multispecies coalescent model with migration . Syst. Biol . 73 , 1015 – 1037 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syae050 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Kozlov , A.M. , Darriba , D. , Flouri , T. , Morel , B. , Stamatakis , A ., 2019 . RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference . Bioinform . 35 , 4453 – 4455 . doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Lara-Tufiño , J.D. , Meza-Lazaro , R.N. , Nieto-Montes de Oca , A. , 2025 . Phylogenomics and species delimitation in the Lepidophyma sylvaticum complex (Squamata: Xantusiidae) using ddRADseq and morphological data . Mol. Phylogenet. and Evol . 204 , 108288 . doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2025.108288 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Lavretsky , P. , DaCosta , J.M. , Sorenson , M.D. , McCracken , K.G. , Peters , J.L ., 2019 . ddRAD-seq data reveal significant genome-wide population structure and divergent genomic regions that distinguish the mallard and close relatives in North America . Mol. Ecol . 28 , 2594 – 2609 . doi: 10.1111/mec.15091 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Lê , S. , Josse , J. , Husson , F ., 2008 . FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis . J. of stat. softw . 25 , 1 – 18 . doi: 10.18637/jss.v025.i01 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Leache , A.D. , Zhu T. , Rannala , B. , Yang , Z ., 2019 . The spectre of too many species . Syst. Biol . 68 , 168 – 181 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syy051 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Lemmon , E.M. , Lemmon , A.R. , Cannatella , D.C ., 2007 . Geological and climatic forces driving speciation in the continentally distributed trilling chorus frogs ( Pseudacris ) . Evol . 61 , 2086 – 2103 . doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00181.x OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Li , X. , Wiens , J.J ., 2023 . Estimating global biodiversity: the role of cryptic insect species . Syst. Biol . 72 , 391 – 403 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syac069 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Lifjeld , J.T ., 2015 . When taxonomy meets genomics: lessons from a common songbird . Mol. Ecol . 24 , 2901 – 2903 . doi: 10.1111/mec.13244 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Linck , E. , Battey , C.J ., 2019 . Minor allele frequency thresholds strongly affect population structure inference with genomic data sets . Mol. Ecol. Resour . 19 , 639 – 647 . doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12995 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Lischer , H.E. , Excoffier , L ., 2012 . PGDSpider: an automated data conversion tool for connecting population genetics and genomics programs . Bioinform . 28 , 298 – 299 . doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr642 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ McCartney-Melstad , E. , Gidiş , M. , Shaffer , H.B. , 2019 . An empirical pipeline for choosing the optimal clustering threshold in RADseq studies . Mol. Ecol. Resour . 19 , 1195 – 1204 . doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13029 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Wauer RH , Riskind DH Metcalf , A.L ., 1977 . Some Quaternary molluscan faunas from the northern Chihuahuan Desert and their paleoecological implications . In: Wauer RH , Riskind DH (eds) Trans-actions of the Symposium on the Biological Resources of the Chihuahuan Desert, Proc Trans Ser, vol 3. Nat Park Serv , pp 1 – 658 ↵ Miller , M.A. , Pfeiffer , W. , Schwartz , T. , 2010 . Creating the CIPRES Sci., Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees . In 2010 gateway computing environments workshop (GCE) (pp. 1 – 8 ). Ieee . doi: 10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Nieto-Montes de Oca , A. , Barley , A.J. , Meza-Lazaro , R.N. , García-Vazquez , U.O. , Zamora-Abrego , J.G. , Thomson , R.C. , Leache , A.D. , 2017 . Phylogenomics and species delimitation in the knob-scaled lizards of the genus Xenosaurus (Squamata: Xenosauridae) using ddRADseq data reveal a substantial underestimation of diversity . Mol. Phylogenet. and Evol . 106 , 241 – 253 . OpenUrl ↵ Morafka , D.J. , 1977 Is there a Chihuahuan Desert? A quantitative evaluation through a herpetofaunal perspective . In Transactions of the Symposium on the Biological Resources of the Chihuahuan Desert Region, United States and Mexico . National Park Service , Washington, DC (pp. 437 – 454 ). ↵ Myers , E.A. , Mulcahy , D.G. , Falk , B. , Johnson , K. , Carbi , M. , de Queiroz , K. , 2022 . Interspecific gene flow and mitochondrial genome capture during the radiation of Jamaican Anolis lizards (Squamata; Iguanidae) . Syst. Biol . 71 , 501 – 511 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syab089 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Myers , E.A. , Xue , A.T. , Gehara , M. , Cox , C.L. , Davis Rabosky , A.R. , Lemos-Espinal , J. , Martinez-Gómez Burbrink , F.T. , 2019 . Environmental heterogeneity and not vicariant biogeographic barriers generate community-wide population structure in desert-adapted snakes . Mol. Ecol . 28 , 4535 – 4548 . doi: 10.1111/mec.15182 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Nuñez , L.P. , Gray , L.N. , Weisrock , D.W. , Burbrink , F.T ., 2023 . The phylogenomic and biogeographic history of the gartersnakes, watersnakes, and allies (Natricidae: Thamnophiini) . Mol. Phylogenet. and Evol . 186 , 107844 . doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107844 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Nygren , A ., 2014 . Cryptic polychaete diversity: A review . Zool. Scr . 43 , 172 – 183 . doi: 10.1111/zsc.12044 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Olave , M. , Meyer , A ., 2020 . Implementing large genomic single nucleotide polymorphism data sets in phylogenetic network reconstructions: a case study of particularly rapid radiations of cichlid fish . Syst. Biol . 69 , 848 – 862 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syaa005 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Pang , X.X. , Zhang , D.Y ., 2024 . A cautionary note on using STRUCTURE to detect hybridization in a phylogenetic context . BioRxiv 2024 – 02 . doi: 10.1101/2024.02.06.579057 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Paradis , E. , Schliep , K ., 2019 . ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R . Bioinform . 35 , 526 – 528 . doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Parker , E. , Dornburg , A. , Struthers , C.D. , Jones , C.D. , Near , T.J ., 2022 . Phylogenomic species delimitation dramatically reduces species diversity in an Antarctic adaptive radiation . Syst. Biol . 71 , 58 – 77 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syab057 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Pavón-Vazquez , C.J. , Rana , Q. , Farleigh , K. , Crispo , E. , Zeng , M. , Liliah , J. , Mulcahy , D. , Ascanio , A. , Jezkova , T. , Leache , A.D. , Flouri , T. , Yang , Z. , Blair , C ., 2024 . Gene flow and isolation in the arid Nearctic revealed by genomic analyses of desert spiny lizards . Syst. Biol . 73 , 323 – 342 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syae001 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Perez-Ponce de León , G. , Poulin , R. , 2016 . Taxonomic distribution of cryptic diversity among metazoans: Not so homogeneous after all . Biol. Lett . 12 , 20160371 . doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0371 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Perry , B.W. , Card , D.C. , McGlothlin , J.W. , Pasquesi , G.I. , Adams , R.H. , Schield , D.R. , Hales , N.R. , Corbin , A.B. , Demuth , J.P. , Hoffmann , F.G. , Vandewege , M.W. , Schott , R.K. , Bhattacharyya , N. , Chang , B.S.W. , Casewell , N.R. , Whiteley , G. , Reyes-Velasco , J. , Mackessy , S.P. , Gamble , T. , Storey , K.B. , Biggar , K.K. , Passow , C.N. , Kuo , C.H. , McGaugh , S.E. , Bronikowski , A.M. , de Koning , A.P.J. , Edwards , S.V. , Pfrender , M.E. , Minx , P. , Brodie , E.D . 3rd . ., Brodie , E.D. Jr . ., Warren , W. C. , Castoe , T.A. , 2018 . Molecular adaptations for sensing and securing prey and insight into amniote genome diversity from the garter snake genome . Genome Biol. and Evol. 10 , 2110 – 2129 . doi: 10.1093/gbe/evy157 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Peterson , B.K. , Weber , J.N. , Kay , E.H. , Fisher , H.S. , Hoekstra , H.E ., 2012 . Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species . PLoS One 7 , e37135 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037135 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Piñeros , V. J. , Pedraza-Marrón , C. del R. , Betancourt-Resendes , I. , Calderón-Cortes , N. , Betancur-R , R. , and Domínguez-Domínguez , O. , 2022 . Genome-wide species delimitation analyses of a silverside fish species complex in central Mexico indicate taxonomic over-splitting . BMC Ecol. and Evol . 22 , 108 . doi: 10.1186/s12862-022-02063-0 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Prates , I. , Hutchinson , M.N. , Singhal , S. , Moritz , C. , Rabosky , D.L ., 2024 . Notes from the taxonomic disaster zone: Evolutionary drivers of intractable species boundaries in an Australian lizard clade (Scincidae: Ctenotus ) . Mol. Ecol . 33 , e17074 . doi: 10.1111/mec.17074 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Pritchard , J.K. , Stephens , M. , Donnelly , P ., 2000 . Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data . Genet . 155 , 945 – 959 . doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Pyron , R.A. , Hsieh , F.W. , Lemmon , A.R. , Lemmon , E.M. , Hendry , C.R ., 2016 . Integrating phylogenomic and morphological data to assess candidate species-delimitation models in brown and red-bellied snakes ( Storeria ) . Zool. J. of the Linn. Soc . doi: 10.1111/zoj.12392 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Quattrini , A.M. , Wu , T. , Soong , K. , Jeng , M.S. , Benayahu , Y. , McFadden , C.S ., 2019 . A next generation approach to species delimitation reveals the role of hybridization in a cryptic species complex of corals . BMC Evol. Biol . 19 , 1 – 19 . doi: 10.1186/s12862-019-1427-y OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Rambaut , A. , 2018 . FigTree v1.4.4 . Available at: https://github.com/rambaut/figtree/releases/tag/v1.4.4 Ramírez-Barrera , S.M. , Velasco , J.A. , Orozco-Tellez , T.M. , Vazquez-López , A.M. , Hernandez-Baños , B.E. , 2019 . What drives genetic and phenotypic divergence in the Red-crowned Ant Tanager ( Habia rubica , Aves: Cardinalidae), a polytypic species? Ecol. and Evol. 9 , 12339 – 12352 . doi: 10.1002/ece3.5742 OpenUrl CrossRef Rannala , B. , Yang , Z ., 2013 . Improved reversible jump algorithms for Bayesian species delimitation . Genet . 194 , 245 – 253 . doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.149039 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Rosenberg , N.A ., 2003 . The shapes of neutral gene genealogies in two species: probabilities of monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly in a coalescent model . Evol . 57 , 1465 – 1477 . doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00355.x OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Rowe , K. C. , Aplin , K. P. , Baverstock , P. R. , Moritz , C ., 2011 . Recent and rapid speciation with limited morphological disparity in the genus Rattus . Syst. Biol . 60 , 188 – 203 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq092 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ RStudio Team , 2020 . RStudio: Integrated Development for R . RStudio, PBC , Boston, MA . URL: http://www.rstudio.com/ . ↵ Ruane , S. , Bryson Jr , R.W. , Pyron , R.A. , Burbrink , F.T ., 2014 . Coalescent species delimitation in milksnakes (genus Lampropeltis ) and impacts on phylogenetic comparative analyses . Syst. Biol . 63 , 231 – 250 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syt099 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Sabaj , M.H. , 2023 . Codes for Natural History Collections in Ichthyology and Herpetology (online supplement) . Version 9.5 (10 Nov 2023). Available at https://asih.org , American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists , Washington, DC . ↵ Sabath , M.D. , Sabath , L.E ., 1969 . Morphological intergradation in Gulf coastal brown snakes, Storeria dekayi and Storeria tropica . Am. Midl. Nat . 148 – 155 . doi: 10.2307/2423656 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ San Jose , M. , Doorenweerd , C. , Geib , S. , Barr , N. , Dupuis , J.R. , Leblanc , L. , Kauwe , A. , Morris , K.Y. , Rubinoff , D. , 2023 . Interspecific gene flow obscures phylogenetic relationships in an important insect pest species complex . Mol. Phylogenet. and Evol . 188 , 107892 . doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107892 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Mandujano M.C. , Pisanty I , Eguiarte L.E Scheinvar , E. , Gamez , N. , Moreno-Letelier , A. , Aguirre-Planter , E. , Eguiarte , L.E ., 2020 . Phylogeography of the Chihuahuan Desert: diversification and evolution over the Pleistocene . In Mandujano M.C. , Pisanty I , Eguiarte L.E , editors. Plant Diversity and Ecology in the Chihuahuan Desert: Emphasis on the Cuatro Cienegas Basin , Cham : Springer . 19 – 44 . doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-44963-6_2 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Schield , D.R. , Card , D.C. , Adams , R.H. , Jezkova , T. , Reyes-Velasco , J. , Proctor , F.N. , Spencer , C.L. , Herrmann H. , Mackessy , S. , Castoe , T.A ., 2015 . Incipient speciation with biased gene flow between two lineages of the Western Diamondback Rattlesnake ( Crotalus atrox ) . Mol. Phylogenet. and Evol . 83 , 213 – 223 . doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.12.006 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Schmidt , K.P. , Owens , D.W ., 1944 . Amphibians and reptiles of northern Coahuila , Mexico. Zool. Ser. of the Field Mus. of Nat. Hist . 29 , 97 – 115 . OpenUrl ↵ Solís-Lemus , C. , Bastide , P. , and Ane , C ., 2017 . Phylonetworks: A package for phylogenetic networks . Mol. Biol. and Evol . 34 , 3292 – 3298 . doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx235 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Soltis , D.E. , Morris , A.B. , McLachlan , J.S. , Manos , P.S. , Soltis , P.S ., 2006 . Comparative phylogeography of unglaciated eastern North America . Mol. Ecol . 15 , 4261 – 4293 . doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03061.x OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Steenwyk , J.L. , Li , Y. , Zhou , X. , Shen , X.X. , Rokas , A ., 2023 . Incongruence in the phylogenomics era . Nat. Rev. Genet . 24 834 – 850 . doi: 10.1038/s41576-023-00620-x OpenUrl CrossRef Swofford , D.L ., 1993 . PAUP, phylogenetic analysis using parsimony . Version 3.1. Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey . ↵ Thornbury , W.D ., 1965 . Regional geomorphology of the United States . Soil Sci . 100 , 148 . OpenUrl ↵ Trapido , H ., 1944 . The snakes of the genus Storeria . The Am. Midl. Nat . 31 , 1 – 84 . doi: 10.2307/2421382 OpenUrl CrossRef Uetz , P. , Freed , P. , Aguilar , R. , Reyes , F. , Kudera , J. , Hosek , J. , 2025 . The Reptile Database . Available at: http://www.reptile-database.org/ ↵ Vite-Hernandez , A. , 2023 . Evaluación taxonómica de una población de Storeria (Squamata: Natricidae) de Cuatro Cienegas, Coahuila, Mexico . Tesis licenciatura . Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico , Mexico . ↵ Wallach , V. , Williams , K.L. , Boundy , J ., 2014 . Snakes of the world: A catalogue of living and extinct species . CRC Press . ↵ Wang , X. , Lu , B. , Shao , L. , Li , Z. , Ali , A. , Yu , F. , Fu , Z. , Sun , F ., 2022 . Genome-wide SNPs reveal the fine-scale population structure of Laodelphax striatellus in China using double-digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing . Genom . 114 , 110329 . doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110329 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Wickham , H. , Averick , M. , Bryan , J. , Chang , W. , McGowan , L. D.A. , François , R. , Grolemund , G. , Hayes , A. , Henry , L. , Hester , J. , Kuhn , M. , Pedersen , T.L. , Miller , E. , Bache , S.M. , Muller , K. , Ooms , J. , Robinson , D. , Sidel , D.P. , Spinu , V. , Takahashi , K. , Vaughan , D. , Wilke , C. , Woo , K. , Yutani , H ., 2019 . Welcome to the Tidyverse . J. of Open Source Softw . 4 , 1686 . doi: 10.21105/joss.01686 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Yanchukov , A. , Hofman , S. , Szymura , J.M. , Mezhzherin , S.V. , Morozov-Leonov , S.Y. , Barton , N.H. , Nürnberger , B. , 2006 . Hybridization of Bombina bombina and B. variegata (Anura , Discoglossidae) at a sharp ecotone in western Ukraine: comparisons across transects and over time. Evol . 60 , 583 – 600 . doi: 10.1554/04-739.1 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Yang , Z ., 2015 . The BPP program for species tree estimation and species delimitation . Curr. Zool . 61 , 854 – 865 . doi: 10.1093/czoolo/61.5.854 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Yang , Z. , Rannala , B ., 2014 . Unguided species delimitation using DNA sequence data from multiple loci . Mol. Biol. and Evol . 31 , 3125 – 3135 . doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu279 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Yang , Z. , Rannala , B ., 2010 . Bayesian species delimitation using multilocus sequence data . Proc. of the Nat. Acad. of Sci. U. S. A ., 107 , 9264 – 9269 . doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913022107 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Yi , H. , Dong , S. , Yang , L. , Wang , J. , Kidner , C. , Kang , M ., 2023 . Genome-wide data reveal cryptic diversity and hybridization in a group of tree ferns . Mol. Phylogenet. and Evol . 184 , 107801 . doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107801 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Zheng , H. , Fan , L. , Milne , R. I. , Zhang , L. , Wang , Y. , Mao , K ., 2017 . Species delimitation and lineage separation history of a species complex of aspens in China . Front. in Plant Sci . 8 , 375 . doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00375 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Zheng , X.W. , Levine , D. , Shen , J. , Gogarten , S.M. , Laurie , C. , Weir , B.S ., 2012 . A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data . Bioinform . 28 , 3326 – 3328 . doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts606 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Zheng , Y. , Wiens , J.J ., 2016 . Combining phylogenomic and supermatrix approaches, and a time-calibrated phylogeny for squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) based on 52 genes and 4,162 species . Mol. Phylogenet. and Evol . 94 , 537 – 547 . doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.10.009 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted October 31, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Phylogenomics and species delimitation in the brown snake Storeria dekayi (Natricidae) Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Phylogenomics and species delimitation in the brown snake Storeria dekayi (Natricidae) Victor Gabriel Castillo-Sanchez , Adrian Nieto-Montes de Oca , John J. Wiens , Marysol Trujano-Ortega , Uri O. García-Vazquez bioRxiv 2025.10.30.685713; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.30.685713 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Phylogenomics and species delimitation in the brown snake Storeria dekayi (Natricidae) Victor Gabriel Castillo-Sanchez , Adrian Nieto-Montes de Oca , John J. Wiens , Marysol Trujano-Ortega , Uri O. García-Vazquez bioRxiv 2025.10.30.685713; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.30.685713 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Molecular Biology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7629) Biochemistry (17660) Bioengineering (13881) Bioinformatics (41911) Biophysics (21436) Cancer Biology (18578) Cell Biology (25482) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13371) Ecology (19887) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24302) Genetics (15599) Genomics (22483) Immunology (17728) Microbiology (40364) Molecular Biology (17163) Neuroscience (88537) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2830) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4821) Physiology (7637) Plant Biology (15129) Scientific Communication and Education (2045) Synthetic Biology (4290) Systems Biology (9817) Zoology (2269)
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.