Canonical WNT signalling governs Echinococcus metacestode development

Canonical WNT signalling governs Echinococcus metacestode development | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Canonical WNT signalling governs Echinococcus metacestode development Ruth Herrmann , Luisa Schiegl , Michaela Herz , Kilian Rudolf , Akito Koike , Markus Spiliotis , Monika Bergmann , Nancy Holroyd , Uriel Koziol , View ORCID Profile Matt Berriman , View ORCID Profile Klaus Brehm doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.17.676774 Ruth Herrmann 1 Consultant Laboratory for Echinococcosis, Institute of Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg , Würzburg, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Luisa Schiegl 1 Consultant Laboratory for Echinococcosis, Institute of Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg , Würzburg, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Michaela Herz 1 Consultant Laboratory for Echinococcosis, Institute of Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg , Würzburg, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Kilian Rudolf 1 Consultant Laboratory for Echinococcosis, Institute of Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg , Würzburg, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Akito Koike 1 Consultant Laboratory for Echinococcosis, Institute of Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg , Würzburg, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Markus Spiliotis 1 Consultant Laboratory for Echinococcosis, Institute of Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg , Würzburg, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Monika Bergmann 1 Consultant Laboratory for Echinococcosis, Institute of Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg , Würzburg, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Nancy Holroyd 2 Parasite Genomics, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus , Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Uriel Koziol 1 Consultant Laboratory for Echinococcosis, Institute of Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg , Würzburg, Germany 3 Sección Biología Celular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República , Montevideo, Uruguay Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Matt Berriman 2 Parasite Genomics, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus , Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Matt Berriman Klaus Brehm 1 Consultant Laboratory for Echinococcosis, Institute of Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg , Würzburg, Germany Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Klaus Brehm For correspondence: klaus.brehm{at}uni-wuerzburg.de Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Preview PDF Abstract Alveolar echinococcosis (AE) is a lethal zoonosis caused by infiltrative growth of the metacestode larva of the tapeworm Echinococcus multilocularis in host organs. We previously showed that the Echinococcus metacestode is an evolutionarily unique, broadly posteriorized tissue, leading us to hypothesize that canonical WNT (cWNT) signalling—which patterns the body axis across metazoans—might be critical for metacestode formation. Here, we report effective RNAi-mediated knockdown of the E. multilocularis β-catenin gene ( bcat-1 ), the central effector of cWNT signalling, in a primary parasite cell culture system that produces metacestode vesicles. bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures were markedly impaired in vesicle formation, exhibited stem-cell hyperproliferation, and displayed disrupted muscle-fibre organisation. Genome-wide transcriptomics revealed a general anteriorization of gene expression, and in situ hybridization showed an overproduction of cells expressing head-inducing factors such as sfrp upon bcat-1 knockdown. Conversely, metacestode-specific genes—including the tegumental factors muc-1 , TNFR , and antigen B—as well as the posterior marker post2b were significantly downregulated, consistent with the observed vesicle-formation defects. In situ analyses further identified anterior markers— frizzled-10 , nou-darake , notum , and follistatin —that were overexpressed in bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures and localized to the future anterior pole at the earliest stages of protoscolex formation. Finally, pharmacological inhibition of WNT signalling with pyrvinium pamoate caused complete loss of posterior tissue in Echinococcus protoscoleces, killed metacestode vesicles, and reduced stem-cell proliferation at nanomolar concentrations. Together, these findings establish a central role for cWNT signalling in directing Echinococcus body-axis formation and the posteriorization events driving metacestode growth within the host, providing insight into asexual parasite proliferation mediated by this biologically unique larval stage and pointing to potential targets for chemotherapy against AE. Author Summary Alveolar echinococcosis (AE) is a lethal disease caused by the cancer-like growth of the metacestode larva of the tapeworm Echinococcus multilocularis . From a developmental perspective, the Echinococcus metacestode is an unusual biological structure and even atypical among tapeworms. Previous work indicated that metacestode formation involves re-patterning of the body axis, eliminating head structures and producing broadly posteriorized tissue. How this is controlled at the molecular and cellular levels, however, was unknown. In this study, we perturbed expression of the β-catenin gene ( bcat-1 ), a central regulator of canonical WNT signalling, using RNA interference (RNAi). bcat-1 (RNAi) parasite cultures failed to generate metacestode vesicles and instead showed stem-cell hyperproliferation and muscle-cell distortion. Genes required for posteriorized metacestode tissue were downregulated, whereas genes directing head formation in adult worms ( follistatin , sfrp , fz10 , ndk ) were upregulated, indicating a general anteriorization of the culture system. Pharmacological inhibition of WNT signalling with pyrvinium pamoate caused complete loss of posterior structures in protoscoleces, reduced stem-cell proliferation, and killed metacestode tissue. These findings identify β-catenin and the canonical WNT pathway as crucial regulators of the posteriorization that underlies metacestode formation. Given that WNT signalling is deregulated in many human cancers and that small-molecule inhibitors are available, our results suggest new avenues for anti-AE drug development. INTRODUCTION The metacestode larval stage of the fox tapeworm Echinococcus multilocularis causes alveolar echinococcosis (AE), a lethal zoonosis prevalent across the Northern Hemisphere [ 1 ]. In the intermediate host, parasite development is exclusively driven by a population of undifferentiated stem cells termed germinative cells (GC) [ 2 , 3 ]. A small number of GC enter the host as part of the oncosphere contained within infectious eggs, which are shed by the definitive host and ingested by the intermediate host [ 3 ]. After hatching in the intestine and crossing the intestinal wall, the oncosphere reaches the liver, where GC drive a metamorphosis into the metacestode: a network of fluid-filled vesicles that infiltratively grows and expands into surrounding tissue, akin to a malignant tumor [ 4 , 5 ]. Proliferation is exclusively GC-driven; as in other flatworm stem cell systems, these are the only mitotically active cells and give rise to all differentiated lineages (e.g., muscle, nerve, and glycogen/lipid-storing cells) [ 2 ]. In natural intermediate hosts (rodents), GC in the germinal layer ultimately generate brood capsules, culminating in the formation of protoscoleces—juvenile, unsegmented forms that infect the definitive host upon predation [ 5 ]. In human infections, by contrast, protoscolex formation is rare [ 6 ]. Human AE is generally difficult to treat; albendazole/mebendazole chemotherapy targeting parasite β-tubulin often requires prolonged—sometimes lifelong—administration and is associated with adverse effects [ 7 ]. In typical tapeworm development, the oncosphere develops directly into scolex-bearing structures, such that a single invading oncosphere yields one juvenile metacestode with a single scolex [ 5 ]. By contrast, the Echinococcus metacestode is a highly derived structure that can generate numerous protoscoleces from a single oncosphere, enabling asexual multiplication within the intermediate host [ 8 ]. As shown previously [ 5 ], metacestode formation reflects a modification of the primary anterior–posterior (A–P) axis during the oncosphere–metacestode transition. Upon entry into the intermediate host, the oncosphere appears to transiently suppress the anterior pole—marked by expression of the WNT antagonist sfrp (secreted frizzled-related protein)—and subsequently develops into a fully posteriorized metacestode tissue broadly expressing the posterior markers wnt1 , wnt11a , and post-2 [ 5 ]. Late in infection, the anterior pole is re-established at multiple sites within the metacestode, giving rise to numerous protoscoleces that express sfrp anteriorly and wnt1 posteriorly [ 5 ]. This mirrors axis-formation mechanisms in related free-living planarians, where anterior and posterior poles are likewise marked by sfrp and wnt1 , respectively [ 9 ]. Thus, establishment of the A–P axis is highly conserved among flatworms and, as shown in planarians [ 10 ], is under the direct control of WNT signaling, whose central component is the transcriptional regulator β-catenin [ 11 ]. Accordingly, RNAi-mediated knockdown of β-catenin in planarians yields strikingly anteriorized phenotypes: (a) during regeneration, heads form at wounds that would normally regenerate tails; and (b) during homeostatic tissue turnover, ectopic heads arise along the body axis [ 10 , 12 , 13 ]. Maintenance and regeneration of the correct body plan in planarians are therefore governed by specific WNT ligands expressed in posterior-to-anterior gradients and WNT antagonists released from the anterior [ 14 ]. Notably, in both planarians [ 15 ] and tapeworms [ 5 ], these ligands are produced by muscle cells and act as positional control genes (PCGs) that instruct stem cells to differentiate into correctly patterned tissues [ 14 ]. In tapeworms, WNT signaling also appears to contribute to A– P axis establishment during segmentation and adult development [ 16 ]. We recently characterized β-catenin orthologs in E. multilocularis and identified bcat-1 as the one-to-one ortholog of the planarian β-catenin gene involved in WNT signaling [ 17 ]. Here, we test the hypothesis that bcat-1 (EmuJ_001007700) is a central regulator of A–P axis formation in Echinococcus and directs development toward the metacestode. To this end, we used a primary parasite cell culture system previously established to recapitulate the oncosphere–metacestode transition in vitro [ 18 , 19 ]. Within this system, we have developed functional genomic approaches to achieve targeted knockdown by RNAi [ 19 ] and, in the present work, applied them to manipulate expression of the bcat-1 gene. We show that bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures fail to produce mature metacestode vesicles from stem cells and exhibit a broadly anteriorized gene-expression profile. We further demonstrate that several factors essential for metacestode function are not formed by these cells, whereas anterior pole markers are significantly overexpressed. Finally, treatment with pyrvinium pamoate (PP), a known WNT signaling inhibitor, induces posterior defects in protoscoleces, reduces stem-cell proliferation, and kills metacestode vesicles in vitro. These findings indicate that, as in planarians, canonical WNT signaling is instructive for establishing the correct A–P axis in Echinococcus and identify β-catenin as a central regulator of metacestode formation and growth. RESULTS bcat-1 (RNAi) impairs metacestode development We previously showed that the Echinococcus metacestode constitutes broadly posteriorized tissue, with widespread expression of flatworm posterior markers such as wnt1 and silencing of anterior markers such as sfrp [ 5 ]. Because anterior–posterior (A–P) axis formation in flatworms is directed by WNT signalling [ 13 , 20 ], we hypothesized that this pathway acts as a master regulator of metacestode formation and asexual proliferation. The central effector of cWNT signalling is the transcriptional regulator β-catenin, and we previously identified one of the three Echinococcus β-catenin-encoding genes ( bcat-1 ) as a likely participant in canonical WNT (cWNT) signalling in this parasite [ 17 ]. Using an established RNAi protocol for Echinococcus primary cell cultures [ 19 ], we therefore targeted bcat-1 for knockdown to assess its role in development. As shown in Fig 1A/B , we achieved a stable bcat-1 knockdown to <50% of control levels for at least 14 days in primary cell culture. In contrast to cells electroporated with control siRNAs, bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures were markedly impaired in metacestode vesicle formation: after 14 days, control cultures yielded ∼120 mature vesicles, whereas bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures produced only ∼40 vesicles. In controls, aggregates initially contained red-stained cavities that progressively cleared during cultivation and ultimately formed mature vesicles [ 18 , 19 ]. By contrast, bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures appeared arrested at the early cavity stage, with most cavities retaining a red stain from phenol red in the medium—hereafter termed the “red-dot phenotype” ( Fig 1G ). Download figure Open in new tab Fig 1. bcat-1 (RNAi) inhibits metacestode formation by Echinococcus cell cultures. (A) Formation of mature metacestode vesicles by control cultures (ctrl) and bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures (bCAT(RNAi)) after knockdown with siRNAs. Results of four biological replicates with three technical replicates each. (student’s t-test, **** p < 0,0001). (B) bcat-1 transcript levels after RNAi knockdown with siRNAs. Relative expression of bcat-1 (grey) and control gene elp (black) from three biological replicates after 3 (3d), 7 (7d), and 14 (14 d) days of culture. Shown is standard deviation. (C) Same as in (B) for RNAi knockdown approach using siPOOLs. (D) Same as in (C) for RNAi knockdown approach using siPOOLs. (E) Proportion of proliferating stem cells after 5 h EdU pulse (red) in control (ctrl) and bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures (siRNA approach) after 2 weeks of incubation. Three biological replicates with three technical replicates. (student’s t-test, p < 0,0001). (F) Cell aggregates and emerging metacestode vesicles in control cultures after 2 weeks . (G) Cell aggregates and red dot phenotype in bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures after 2 weeks. (H) Cell aggregates of 2-week-old control cultures stained for nuclei (blue) and muscle fibres (red). (I) Cell aggregates of 2-week-old bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures stained for nuclei (blue) and muscle fibres (red). (J) Cell aggregates of control cultures (2 weeks) stained for nuclei (blue), muscle fibres (red), and nerve cells (green). (K) Cell aggregates of bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures (2 weeks) stained for nuclei (blue), muscle fibres (red), and nerve cells (green). (L) Cell aggregates of control cultures (2 weeks) stained for proliferative stem cells (5h EdU pulse, red). (M) Cell cultures of bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures stained for proliferative stem cells (5h EdU pulse, red). Size bar represents 100 µm in (A) and (B), 50 µm in (C) - (H). Channels in H - K were blue (DAPI, nuclei), red (phalloidin, muscle fibres), green (α-acTub, nerve cells). cav = central cavity. To independently validate the knockdown and minimize off-target effects, we employed the siPOOL system, which uses pooled dsRNAs spanning the entire transcript [ 21 ]. This approach again produced a stable reduction of bcat-1 expression to <50% for ≥14 days ( Fig 1C/D ) and recapitulated the intense red-dot phenotype with developmental arrest at the cavity stage. Under these conditions, formation of mature vesicles was almost completely abolished ( Fig 1C ). To investigate the cellular basis of the red-dot phenotype, bcat-1 (RNAi) aggregates were fixed and stained for muscle and nerve cells [ 22 ], and EdU incorporation was used to assess stem-cell proliferation. As shown in Fig 1E , bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures consistently—and statistically significantly—displayed stem-cell hyperproliferation: ∼32% of cells were in S-phase versus ∼15% in controls. Moreover, muscle fibres in bcat-1 (RNAi) aggregates were disorganized and only rarely accumulated around central cavities, a pattern typically observed during vesicle formation in this system ( Fig 1J-M ). Taken together, bcat-1 knockdown led to a pronounced reduction in metacestode vesicle formation from Echinococcus primary cells, accompanied by stem-cell hyperproliferation and altered muscle-fibre organization. bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures display anteriorized gene-expression patterns To further characterize primary cell cultures after bcat-1 knockdown, we performed genome-wide transcriptome profiling on control aggregates and bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures after 7 days of cultivation (i.e., when the red-dot phenotype was evident). In total, 1,314 genes (12.3%) were significantly upregulated and 1,513 (14.2%) were downregulated in bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures relative to controls (p < 0.05; S1 Table). Consistent with qRT-PCR, read counts confirmed a significant reduction of bcat-1 expression to ∼40% of control levels (S1 Table). Given the observed stem-cell hyperproliferation in bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures, we asked whether stem-cell-associated genes were over-represented among induced transcripts. Using a previously defined set of 1,853 stem-cell-associated genes (reduced in hydroxyurea-treated vesicles) [ 23 ], we found that 661 (35.7%) were significantly upregulated after bcat-1 (RNAi), whereas only 139 (7.5%) were downregulated (S1 Table). These data indicate that the increased number of EdU⁺ cells reflect a general over-representation of stem cells in culture, not merely a short-term increased proliferation rate of otherwise constant numbers of stem cells. Because bcat-1 (RNAi) was expected to affect body-axis formation, we also generated datasets for the protoscolex (PS)—which exhibits an A–P axis [ 5 ]—and for metacestode vesicles devoid of brood capsules, which represent posteriorized tissue [ 5 ]. We defined genes significantly enriched in PS versus metacestode (MC) as PSe (PS-enriched) and those enriched in MC as MCe (MC-enriched). Because positional control genes (PCGs) in flatworms are largely associated with differentiated muscle and nerve cells [ 15 ], we focused on genes not enriched in stem cells (i.e. excluding the earlier 1,853 set). Among 651 genes upregulated after bcat-1 knockdown, 364 were also differentially expressed between PS and MC; of these, 261 (72%) were PSe and 103 (28%) were MCe. Conversely, of 1,374 genes downregulated after bcat-1 (RNAi), 941 were differentially expressed between PS and MC; of these, 255 (27%) were PSe and 686 (73%) were MCe. Thus, upregulated genes after bcat-1 (RNAi) were roughly three times more likely to be PSe than MCe, whereas downregulated genes were roughly three times more likely to be MCe than PSe ( Fig 2B ). Correlation analysis further supported this trend, revealing a significant association between PSe status and upregulation in bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures (Pearson’s r = 0.4546, p < 0.0001; Fig 2C ). We next examined the induced gene set in more detail ( Fig 2A ; S1 Table). Notably, it included sfrp (EmuJ_000838700; 3.3-fold induced), a strict anterior-pole marker previously identified as a head-inducing factor [ 5 ], suggesting that overexpression of head-inducing programmes underlies the general anteriorization of bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures. Among the most induced transcripts (∼10-fold) was frizzled-10 ( fz10 ; EmuJ_000085700), a homolog of planarian frizzled receptors with anterior expression domains [ 24 ]. Additional WNT-pathway components upregulated after bcat-1 (RNAi) included homologs of pangolin/TCF-LEF (EmuJ_000188500), dishevelled ( dsh ; EmuJ_000423700), and a second frizzled receptor, fz1 (EmuJ_000682100). We also identified modulators of WNT signalling among the highly induced genes, such as SERPINA3K (EmuJ_000824000), which inhibits canonical WNT in Xenopus [ 25 ], Glypican-1 (EmuJ_000544900), a regulator of WNT/HH/FGF/BMP pathways [ 26 ], and the homeobox factor aristaless (EmuJ_000574000), reported as a wound-induced negative regulator of WNT signalling [ 27 ]. Download figure Open in new tab Fig 2. bcat-1 knockdown induces anteriorization of Echinococcus cell cultures. (A) Heatmap depicting transcriptional changes of selected genes upon bcat-1 (RNAi). Indicated are the gene IDs of selected E. multilocularis genes alongside annotation. ‘LFC bcat/ctrl’ indicates average log-fold change of bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures versus control cultures, ‘LFC PS/MC’ indicates log-fold changes of PSe versus MCe genes. Positive values are marked in blue, negative values in red. (B) Pie charts indicating relations between differential transcription profiles of genes that are up/down-regulated after bcat-1 (RNAi)(as indicated) and PSe (red) or MCe (blue) genes. ns diff (green) indicates genes that are not significantly differentially expressed between PS and MC. (C) Correlation analysis plot visualizing relationships between genes that are up/down-regulated after bcat-1 (RNAi) (x-axis) and genes enriched in PS versus MC (y-axis) (Pearson’s r = 0.46, p < 0.0001). In addition to posteriorly acting cWNT signalling, the planarian A–P axis is critically shaped by anterior FGF components, notably the FGF receptor-like morphogen nou-darake ( ndk ) and several ndl (nou-darake-like) factors [ 14 ]. The E. multilocularis genome encodes three such genes (EmuJ_000770900, EmuJ_000816800, and EmuJ_000842900; S1 Figure), and all three were 3- to 4-fold induced after bcat-1 (RNAi) ( Fig 2A ; S1 Table). Likewise, both Echinococcus FoxD homologs (EmuJ_000620400; EmuJ_000446500), required for anterior-pole regeneration in planarians [ 28 ], were induced, as was a homolog of the morphogenic transcription factor hunchback (EmuJ_000448000), anteriorly expressed in Drosophila [ 29 ]. Altogether, the bcat-1 (RNAi) expression profile reveals broad upregulation of WNT- and FGF-pathway genes that, in planarians and other metazoans, function as head organizers or anterior PCGs. Beyond WNT and FGF, bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures also overexpressed components of other axis-patterning systems. These included homologs of hedgehog ligands (EmuJ_001200300) and a Gli-like transcription factor (EmuJ_000711000), TGFβ signalling components emact (EmuJ_000178100) [ 30 ] and follistatin ( fst ) (EmuJ_000278400; S2 Figure), and Delta/Notch components identified recently [ 31 ], such as jagged-like ligands (EmuJ_000392700; EmuJ_000851300) and a hairy/enhancer-of-split-like repressor (EmuJ_001041200). Notably, among the most strongly (>20-fold) induced transcripts were genes encoding EG95 (EmuJ_000710400; EmuJ_000368620) and gp50 antigens (EmuJ_000512300; EmuJ_000049700; EmuJ_000295100), whose cellular functions in Echinococcus remain unknown. As a quality control, we validated several up- and downregulated targets by qRT-PCR in independently performed bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures and confirmed significant up- or down-regulation in all cases (S3 Figure). Finally, in situ hybridization for ndk (EmuJ_000770900), fz10 , sfrp , and fst revealed substantially more gene-positive cells in bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures than in controls (S4 Figure), indicating that elevated read counts primarily reflect an increased number of expressing cells, rather than uniform per-cell upregulation. In summary, bcat-1 knockdown drives a pronounced shift toward protoscolex-enriched programmes and robust induction of putative anterior axis regulators and head organizers, while metacestode-enriched genes are broadly reduced. These transcriptomic changes align with the cellular phenotypes observed after bcat-1 (RNAi). bcat-1 (RNAi) primary cells fail to express key factors required for metacestode development We next examined genes that were significantly repressed in primary cells following bcat-1 (RNAi). As shown in S1 Table, one of the most strongly reduced transcripts was muc-1 (EmuJ_000742900; >40-fold reduced), which encodes a member of an Echinococcus -specific apomucin family and a major component of the laminated layer [ 32 ]. In our primary cell culture system, we recently demonstrated that metacestode vesicles initially arise as inside-out vesicles—central cavities encircled by muc-1 – positive tegumental structures—from which mature, outside-in vesicles later develop [ 23 ]. By in situ hybridization, we confirmed this here for RNAi control cultures ( Fig 3A ), which showed intense muc-1 staining around central cavities. In bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures, by contrast, muc-1 expression around cavities was rarely detected and was in most aggregates entirely absent, despite comparable aggregate size ( Fig 3B ). Download figure Open in new tab Fig 3. bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures fail to express metacestode -specific genes. Shown are representative WISH analyses for selected E. multilocularis genes (indicated above to the right) in cell aggregates of control cultures (control, A, E,I,C,G,K) and bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures (bcat-1(RNAi), B,F,J,D,H,L). Shown are merge pictures (single confocal slices) of all three channels: blue (nuclei, DAPI), red (proliferative cells, EdU+), green (gene-specific probe). Scale bar represents 50 µm in all panels except I where it is 20 µm. A second, as yet uncharacterized mucin gene, muc-2 (EmuJ_000938200; S5 Figure), was likewise >13-fold repressed after bcat-1 (RNAi). In controls, muc-2 strongly labelled a cellular layer adjacent to central cavities, whereas no staining was observed in bcat-1 knockdown aggregates ( Fig 3C/D ). Beyond mucins of the laminated layer, another hallmark of Echinococcus metacestode vesicles is robust expression of antigen B lipoproteins, major constituents of hydatid fluid [ 33 ]. These isoforms are encoded by a cluster of five genes in the Echinococcus genome [ 34 ], and all five were strongly suppressed after bcat-1 (RNAi) (S1 Table). Additional metacestode-specific factors with significantly reduced expression included a tumour necrosis factor receptor family member ( TNFR ; EmuJ_000990500) recently described by us [ 23 ]; the WNT morphogen wnt11b (EmuJ_000010400); the posterior marker post2b (EmuJ_000959700) [ 5 ]; and an axin ortholog ( axin-1 ; EmuJ_000624800), previously shown to be expressed in the metacestode and in posterior regions of the developing protoscolex [ 17 ]. Notably, among the most strongly reduced transcripts we also identified an ortholog of ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 ( S6K1 ; EmuJ_000297700), which has been reported to enhance oncogenic WNT signalling by promoting formation of the β-catenin transcriptional complex in HEK293T cells [ 35 ], as well as an uncharacterized inhibitory Smad (iSmad) family member ( smadF ; EmuJ_001052400; S6 Figure). As with bcat-1 (RNAi)-induced genes, we validated repression by in situ hybridization: muc-1 , muc-2 , post2b , wnt11b , TNFR , and smadF were readily detected in control cultures but were strongly reduced or absent in bcat-1 (RNAi) aggregates ( Fig 3 ). Taken together, these analyses show that multiple hallmark components crucial for metacestode vesicle development and physiology are profoundly suppressed in primary cell cultures upon bcat-1 knockdown. FGF- and WNT-signalling head organizers are induced during protoscolex development Given (i) our previous observation of clear homologies in gene-expression patterns between cestode larval metamorphosis and late planarian development [ 5 ], and (ii) the fact that many bcat-1 (RNAi)-induced genes belong to the planarian positional-control toolkit that specifies body axes [ 36 ], we hypothesized that these genes are activated at the onset of brood-capsule formation and during protoscolex development. We further posited that their expression domains within the protoscolex would mirror those of their planarian homologs. To test this, we performed in situ hybridization on metacestode vesicles across defined stages of protoscolex production. For fz10 , no expression was detected in metacestode vesicles lacking brood capsules (not shown), but clear signals appeared at the onset of brood-capsule formation, centred on the cell accumulations that mark early capsule development ( Fig 4A ). Throughout protoscolex development, fz10 was expressed in two domains immediately lateral to the anterior pole ( Fig 4B-D ), whereas expression ceased in fully developed protoscoleces (not shown). Based on this pattern—and on the strong repression of fz10 under functional WNT signalling—we conclude that fz10 is likely among the earliest Echinococcus genes acting as an anterior head inducer to promote protoscolex formation; its expression appears dispensable once the larva is fully formed. Download figure Open in new tab Fig 4. FGF- and Wnt-signalling components are expressed in brood capsules and anteriorly during PS development. (A) – (D) Expression of fz10 in early brood capsule (A) and during different phases of PS development (B – D). Dashed lines indicate brood capsule structure. Note the expression domains lateral to the anterior pole (arrow). (E) - (H) Expression of ndk in early brood capsules (E), the developing PS (F, G), and mature PS (H). Arrow indicates anterior pole, r indicates rostellum. (I,J) Expression of ndl1 in early brood capsule (I) and mature PS (J). r indicates rostellum. (K,L) Expression of ndl2 in mature PS. (K) side view, (L) view from anterior pole. R indicates rostellum. All images (except J-L) are merge pictures (single confocal slices) of three channels: blue (nuclei, DAPI), red (proliferating stem cells, EdU), green (gene specific probe). (J) – (L) are merge pictures of DAPI and gene specific probe only. Scale bars are 30 µm in A, E, F, I and 50 µm in B, C, D, G, H, J, K, L. Similarly, ndk was undetectable in vesicles without brood capsules, then became induced in early brood capsules and remained close to the anterior pole until protoscolex development was complete ( Fig 4 ). It should be noted that prior to the formation of the rostellum (hooked structure at the anterior end), ndk was still expressed at the anterior pole, whereas in fully mature protoscoleces we observed a collar-like expression pattern surrounding the rostellum ( Fig 4E-H ). Unlike fz10 , ndk expression persisted after protoscolex completion. ndl1 and ndl2 were likewise induced early near the anterior pole. In mature protoscoleces, ndl2 formed a collar-like domain adjacent to ndk but slightly more posterior ( Fig 4K/L ), and ndl1 was expressed in a domain around the suckers, immediately posterior to ndl2 ( Fig 4I/J ). Because orthologs of fz10 , ndk , ndl1 , and ndl2 pattern anterior domains in planarians [ 37 ], we infer that these genes are strongly repressed in metacestode vesicles during infiltrative growth but become induced at the onset of brood-capsule formation to establish a head-organizing centre maintained throughout protoscolex development. Whereas fz10 is no longer expressed once the protoscolex is complete, the FGF-signalling components ndk , ndl1 , and ndl2 remain expressed in the anterior region. notum and TGF-β signalling components are expressed in the metacestode and anteriorly during protoscolex formation Previous work has shown that re-establishment of the anterior pole during planarian regeneration requires the WNT antagonist notum and the TGF-β signalling components follistatin ( fst ) and activin [ 38 , 39 ]. We previously found that an Echinococcus activin ortholog ( emact ; EmuJ_000178100) is expressed in the metacestode during infiltrative growth and is strongly upregulated near the anterior pole during brood-capsule and protoscolex formation [ 40 ]. Consistent with this, emact was induced more than three-fold in bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures relative to controls ( Fig 2A ; S1 Table). We also identified a single fst ortholog in the E. multilocularis genome (EmuJ_000278400; S2 Figure), which—like emact —was induced about three-fold in bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures ( Fig 2A ; S1 Table). By contrast, the only notum ortholog in the genome (EmuJ_000652800; S7 Figure) was not induced after bcat-1 (RNAi) (S1 Table). To assess the involvement of these factors in anterior-pole re-establishment in Echinococcus , we therefore performed additional in situ hybridizations for notum and fst . As shown in Fig 5 , both notum and fst were expressed in post-mitotic cells throughout the germinal layer of vesicles lacking brood capsules. notum transcripts were detected in 4.4 ± 0.5% of all germinal-layer cells, whereas 9.9 ± 1.0% stained positive for fst . Double-positive cells for the gene-specific probe and EdU were rare (< 0.1% for both genes), indicating that expression is confined to post-mitotic cells. For fst we observed expression in cells immediately beneath the tegument ( Fig 5G ) at a location where muscle cells are found [ 22 ], suggesting that muscle is the principal fst -expressing cell type. Download figure Open in new tab Fig 5. Expression of notum and fst in metacestode, brood capsules, and developing PS. (A) – (E) Expression of notum in metacestode tissue (A), early brood capsule (B,C), developing PS (D), and nearly complete PS (E). (A,B) show merge pictures of single confocal slices of all three channels (blue, DAPI, nuclei; red, EdU+, proliferating stem cells; green, gene specific probe) after 5 h EdU pulse. (C-E) show merge pictures of single confocal slices of two channels (blue, green, as in A/B). (F – J) Expression of fst in metacestode tissue (F,G), early brood capsule (H), developing protoscolex (I), and mature protoscolex (J). (F,G) show merge picture of single confocal slices of all three channels (as in A,B) after 5 h EdU pulse. (H,I) show merge pictures of single confocal slices of two channels (as in C-E). (J) shows z projection of several confocal slices of single (activated) protoscolex with two channels (blue, nuclei, DAPI; green, gene specific probe). BC, brood capsule; LL, laminated layer; teg, tegument, r, rostellum, s, sucker. Size bars represent 20 µm in G, 200 µm in J, and 50 µm in all others. At the onset of brood-capsule formation, notum expression appeared in single cells at the anterior pole and remained detectable there throughout protoscolex development ( Fig 5B-D ). In almost fully developed protoscoleces, a faint notum signal persisted near the rostellum ( Fig 5E ), whereas no expression was observed in fully mature, activated protoscoleces (not shown). fst likewise showed strong induction at the start of brood-capsule formation ( Fig 5H ). During protoscolex development, fst was expressed in three domains: two lateral to the anterior pole and one extending centrally from the anterior to the posterior pole ( Fig 5I ), closely resembling the pattern of the FGF-receptor gene emfr2 [ 41 ]. In mature (activated) protoscoleces, fst —like emfr2 — remained expressed within and around the sucker region ( Fig 5J ). Thus, in contrast to fz10 , ndk , ndl1 , and ndl2 , which are absent from metacestode tissue and become strongly induced only upon brood-capsule formation, emact [ 40 ], notum , and fst display expression profiles consistent with roles in anterior-pole formation while also being broadly expressed in post-mitotic cells of the germinal layer in vesicles that have not yet initiated brood-capsule development. PP induces a tailless phenotype in protoscoleces As a complementary approach to our bcat-1 RNAi experiments, we sought to pharmacologically perturb the WNT signalling pathway in Echinococcus . PP, originally identified as a potent anthelmintic against pinworms and adult cestodes [ 42 ], was more recently shown in mammals to inhibit WNT signalling by stimulating casein kinase 1α, a component of the β-catenin destruction complex [ 11 ]. Very recently, PP was also reported to affect WNT signalling in the related trematode Fasciola hepatica [ 20 ]. When applied to protoscoleces at 20–2000 nM, PP produced a striking, concentration-dependent phenotype indicative of WNT inhibition in Echinococcus . After a single dose, we observed loss of major posterior tissue—hereafter referred to as the “tailless” phenotype—in a substantial fraction of protoscoleces ( Fig 6 ). At 2 µM, ∼80% of protoscoleces were tailless after 2 days of incubation, and even at 200 nM, more than 50% were tailless after 7 days ( Fig 6 ). At 20 nM, protoscoleces retained some posterior tissue but had lost the posterior pole, which we previously characterized by wnt1 expression in terminal cells [ 5 ]. Instead, additional wnt1 -expressing cells appeared at the wound site, indicating an attempt to compensate for the loss of the original posterior pole. At 200 nM, nearly all tissue posterior to the sucker region was absent, yet wnt1 expression again emerged in cells at the wound site. At 2000 nM, protoscoleces were largely disintegrated even at the sucker region, and wnt1 -expressing cells were rarely observed ( Fig 6 ). Download figure Open in new tab Fig 6. PP induces tailless phenotype in PS. (A) – (D) Microscopic images of pyrvinium pamoate effects on PS at 0 (A), 20 (B), 200 (C), and 2000 (D) nM. Note intact invaginated and evaginated PS in (A). Intact and tailless (arrow) PS in (B), tailless PS in (C), and disintegrated PS in (D). r indicates rostellum, s indicates suckers. (E) - (H) wnt1-specific WISH on PS after treatment with 0 (E), 20 (F), 200 (G), and 2000 (H) µM PP. All images are merge pictures (single confocal slices) of all three channels: blue (nuclei, DAPI), red (muscle, hmw-tpm), green ( wnt1 ). r indicates rostellum, s indicates suckers. Scale bars represent 100 µm in A-D, 50 µm in E – H. (I) Percentages of tailless phenotypes of PS after treatment with 0, 20, 200, and 2000 nM PP (as indicated) after 2 (d2), 4 (d4), and 7 (d7) days as indicated. Shown are results (SD) of three independent experiments with technical triplicates each. At day 2, differences between 0 and 2000 nM were statistically significant (***, p = 0.0002) and remained significant till day 7. At day 7, differences between 0 nM and 200 nM were statistically significant (*, p = 0.0118). Taken together, the prominent, rapidly induced tailless phenotype demonstrates that PP perturbs β-catenin-dependent WNT signalling in Echinococcus . PP compromises metacestode vesicle integrity and suppresses stem-cell proliferation Having shown that PP affects posterior structures in the Echinococcus protoscolex, we next examined its impact on metacestode vesicles in culture. As shown in Fig 7 , the drug produced clear, concentration-dependent effects on vesicle integrity, most prominently at 2 µM. After 7 days of incubation, 2 µM PP reduced the proportion of structurally intact vesicles to ∼30% (significant), and by 11 days all vesicles had disintegrated ( Fig 7 ). Download figure Open in new tab Fig 7. Effects of pyrvinium pamoate on metacestode vesicle integrity and stem cell proliferation. (A) – (D) Microscopic images of metacestode vesicles after treatment for 14 days with 0 (A), 20 (B), 200 (C), and 2000 (D) uM pyrvinium pamoate. Note structural impairment of germinal layer in C and complete detachment of germinal layer in D. Arrow indicates detached cell mass, LL indicates remaining laminated layer. (E) - (G) Effect of pyrvinium pamoate on germinal layer stem cells. Metacestode vesicles were treated for 7 days with pyrvinium pamoate at 0 (E), 20 (F), and 200 (G) uM followed by one day recovery and a 5 h EdU pulse. Shown are merge pictures of two channels (DAPI, nuclei, blue; EdU, red) of single confocal slices. Size bar indicates 50 um. (H) Effect of pyrvinium pamoate on metacestode vesicle integrity after 1 week treatment with 0 (black), 20 (blue), 200 (green), and 2000 (red) uM. Experiments were carried out in three biological triplicates with three technical triplicates each. After 7 days, differences between 0 and 2000 uM were statistically significant (student#s t-test, p = 0.0018) and remained significant till end of experiment. (I) Effect of pyrvinium pamoate on metacestode stem cells. Indicated are percentages of EdU+ stem cells after 1 week treatment with 0, 20, and 200 nM pyrvinium pamoate (as indicated). Experiments were carried out in three biological replicates with three technical replicates each. Effects were statistically significant between 0 and 20 nM (p = 0.0045) as well as 0 and 200 nM (p = 0.0050) according to student’s t-test. At sublethal concentrations (20 and 200 nM), we also assessed effects on stem-cell proliferation. As shown in Fig 7 , the number of EdU⁺ cells fell significantly to ∼30% in the presence of 20 nM PP and declined even further at 200 nM. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the WNT-inhibitory compound pyrvinium pamoate exerts strong, dose-dependent effects on metacestode vesicle integrity and markedly suppresses stem-cell proliferation. Discussion A defining feature of tapeworms of the genus Echinococcus is the formation of large metacestodes—tumour-like tissue in E. multilocularis and massive cysts in E. granulosus —arising from extensive growth of the germinal layer and enabling prolific asexual multiplication in the intermediate host. Our previous work suggested that metacestode development reflects extensive modification of larval body axes during the oncosphere-to-metacestode transition [ 5 ]. We showed that protoscoleces display opposing poles of cells expressing posterior WNT ligands (e.g., wnt1 ) and anterior WNT antagonists (e.g., sfrp ), indicating that fundamental mechanisms of anteroposterior axis formation known from free-living flatworms [ 9 ] also apply to parasitic species. In sharp contrast, the Echinococcus metacestode constitutes fully posteriorized tissue, with wnt1 -expressing muscle cells dispersed across the germinal layer and complete suppression of the WNT antagonist sfrp [ 5 ]. Expression of sfrp resumes later in infection at sites where brood capsules and protoscoleces form. Based on these findings, we proposed WNT signalling as a central control mechanism for metacestode formation in Echinococcus [ 5 , 43 ]. Here, we functionally interrogated canonical WNT (cWNT) signalling during developmental transitions of E. multilocularis . Using a primary culture system for Echinococcus stem cells [ 18 , 19 ], which recapitulate the oncosphere–metacestode transition in vitro, and RNA interference, we employed both short interfering RNAs and siPOOLs spanning the entire transcript. Both approaches yielded a robust and reproducible developmental phenotype—the “red-dot phenotype”—clearly implicating the targeted gene, bcat-1 , in metacestode formation. This contrasts with earlier RNAi efforts against cytoskeletal or glycolytic genes in the same system, which did not elicit detectable phenotypes [ 19 ]. We attribute the difference to the inherent instability of β-catenin: in the cytoplasm, it is rapidly degraded by the β-catenin destruction complex [ 13 ], making it highly sensitive to even modest reductions in transcript abundance. Moreover, bcat-1 encodes the sole β-catenin of the canonical pathway in Echinococcus [ 17 ], precluding compensation by alternative isoforms. To our knowledge—and aside from attempts targeting protoscolex genes [ 44 , 45 ] or an Echinococcus microRNA [ 46 ]—this is the first report of a robust phenotype following RNAi-mediated knockdown of a protein-coding E. multilocularis gene essential for the metacestode. Notably, we previously observed a similar red-dot phenotype after morpholino-based knockdown of microRNA mir-71 , one cellular target of which is fz10 [ 46 ]. The phenotypic similarity between mir-71 and β-catenin knockdowns may thus, at least in part, reflect upregulation of a single gene— fz10 —which we identify here as strongly induced upon WNT inhibition. Our results reinforce the view that larval metamorphosis in tapeworms and embryonic development in planarians represent phylotypic stages within their respective flatworm clades, with cWNT signalling crucial for establishing the anteroposterior axis in tapeworms. Building on conserved expression of wnt1 and sfrp at posterior and anterior poles [ 5 ], we now show that the nou-darake -like FGF signalling family (orthologs of mammalian FGFRL) also contributes instructively to head patterning in Echinococcus . Our study adds ndk , ndl1 , ndl2 , and fz10 to the catalogue of Echinococcus patterning factors strongly upregulated during brood-capsule formation, alongside sfrp and sfl previously characterized [ 5 ]. Because these factors are absent from metacestode tissue, we propose that they do not trigger brood-capsule initiation; rather, they act in head patterning once the decision for brood-capsule formation has already been made. In contrast, we find three genes— notum , fst , and activin —to be broadly expressed in metacestode tissue before brood-capsule formation and subsequently at or near the anterior pole during protoscolex development. Importantly, these same factors act upstream of sfrp during re-establishment of the anterior pole in planarian regeneration. notum and fst are co-expressed in precursors of sfrp -positive anterior-pole cells [ 28 , 38 , 39 ], and activin collaborates with notum to set regeneration polarity [ 47 ]. We therefore propose that the interplay among notum , fst , and activin within metacestode tissue during infiltrative growth determines the onset of brood-capsule formation, which is then followed by expression of sfrp , fz10 , and ndk to drive head patterning. The molecular and cellular events by which notum , fst , and activin induce brood capsules remain unknown and, as in planarians, will require extensive future experimentation. Of note, we recently showed that mammalian TGF-β induces brood-capsule formation in vitro [ 40 ], suggesting that host-derived factors must also be considered. In addition to emact upregulation after bcat-1 (RNAi), we observed strong downregulation of a previously uncharacterized inhibitory Smad ( smadF ). iSmads are TGF-β/BMP signalling factors that form complexes with regulatory Smads and receptor intracellular domains and, at least in mammals, can also interact with β-catenin [ 48 , 49 ]. Decisions governing brood-capsule induction in Echinococcus may therefore involve not only extracellular interactions between fst , emact , and host TGF-β but also substantial intracellular WNT/TGF-β crosstalk. A key finding of our study is that bcat-1 (RNAi) primary cultures are profoundly compromised in forming mature metacestode vesicles. This defect coincides with significant downregulation of posterior markers (e.g., wnt11b , post2 , axin1 ) and of factors essential for metacestode structure and function. Chief among these is muc-1 , encoding the protein component of a major glycoprotein of the acellular laminated layer, which surrounds the tegument and protects the parasite from host immune cells [ 6 , 50 ]. We likewise observed reduced expression of a tegument-specific alkaline phosphatase isoform [ 2 ] and of all genes encoding Antigen B isoforms, which are critical for lipid uptake from the intermediate host [ 51 ]. Together, these data indicate a diminished capacity of bcat-1 (RNAi) primary cultures to generate tegumental and hydatid-fluid components, supporting the hypothesis that proper metacestode development requires functional cWNT signalling. Previously, we characterized metacestode-specific WNT ligands— wnt11b , wnt11a , and wnt1 —as prominently expressed across the germinal layer of mature vesicles and at the posterior pole of protoscoleces [ 5 ]. As in planarians, these ligands likely help maintain the posteriorized identity of the metacestode [ 13 ]. Because wnt11b and wnt1 are expressed by numerous cells in developing primary cultures, they likely drive stem-cell differentiation toward posterior fates necessary to establish vesicles [ 40 ]. Their marked downregulation in bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures can thus be considered a principal cause of the developmental arrest. Whether wnt11b and wnt1 are direct transcriptional targets of β-catenin/TCF-LEF or are induced indirectly remains unresolved: we did not detect canonical WNT-responsive elements from Drosophila or mammals within proximal promoter regions [ 52 ], implying indirect control, distal regulatory elements, or divergent β-catenin binding motifs in Echinococcus . Our PP experiments indicate that cWNT signalling is required not only for metacestode development but also for maintenance and growth. PP is an allosteric activator of casein kinase 1α (CK1α), a component of the β-catenin destruction complex and therefore a negative regulator of WNT signalling [ 53 ]. The Echinococcus genome encodes three CK1α genes (EmuJ_000637900, EmuJ_000815700, EmuJ_000820700), all expressed in metacestode vesicles and protoscoleces (S1 Table). Given the conserved role of CK1α in β-catenin turnover across metazoans, one or more of these enzymes likely participate in the Echinococcus destruction complex targeting the bcat-1 product. That PP indeed engages flatworm cWNT signalling is supported by recent data showing partial phenocopy of β-catenin RNAi in Fasciola hepatica [ 20 ] and by our observation of a tailless phenotype in Echinococcus protoscoleces. Notably, short-term exposure of in vitro vesicles to relatively low doses of PP not only caused vesicle disintegration but also significantly reduced stem-cell proliferation. Thus, functional cWNT signalling is crucial not only for vesicle formation from stem-cell cultures but also for vesicle integrity and proliferative capacity. Interestingly, the stem-cell phenotype differed depending on the mode and context of WNT inhibition. Direct bcat-1 knockdown in the primary cell system led to stem-cell overproliferation, whereas PP inhibited proliferation in mature vesicles. We propose that Echinococcus stem cells are regulated in a context-dependent manner. In vesicles without brood capsules—characterized by a wnt1 -high environment—cWNT signalling appears necessary for stem-cell proliferation/maintenance. Consistent with this, Nanista et al. [ 54 ] reported severely impaired stem-cell maintenance upon β-catenin knockdown in the wnt1 -high neck region of Hymenolepis diminuta . After the onset of protoscolex formation in Echinococcus brood capsules—which occurs in a wnt1 -low environment and is associated with increased proliferation [ 2 ]—additional factors normally repressed by cWNT signalling may stimulate stem cells. Flatworm neuropeptides, for example, can promote stem-cell proliferation [ 55 – 57 ], and at least three E. multilocularis neuropeptides ( npp-36 , EmuJ_000853400; npp-41 , EmuJ_000205200; npp-37 , EmuJ_000665800) [ 58 ] are strongly upregulated in brood capsules after bcat-1 (RNAi) (S1 Table). Whether these neuropeptides directly act on the stem-cell compartment remains to be determined. Alternatively—or additionally— CK1α, the direct target of PP, may regulate stem-cell proliferation through WNT-independent pathways, for example via crosstalk with Hippo signalling. Ongoing experiments in our laboratory are exploring neuropeptide effects on Echinococcus stem cells and characterizing the parasite Hippo pathway, which likely interacts closely with WNT. In summary, we establish that cWNT signalling directs body-axis patterning in Echinococcus and is required not only for formation of metacestode vesicles from stem-cell cultures but also for maintenance of vesicle integrity and stem-cell proliferation. We identify Echinococcus genes under WNT control, including parasite-specific factors crucial for successful infection, such as muc-1 and genes encoding Antigen B. Finally, we show that the Echinococcus WNT pathway is amenable to pharmacological intervention, suggesting that enzymatic components of the β-catenin destruction complex (e.g., CK1α or glycogen synthase kinase) represent promising targets for novel anti-infectives. Materials and Methods Parasite material and in vitro cultivation Experiments were carried out using parasite isolates Ingrid, GH09, MS1010, GT10, J2012, DDD16, MB17, and TM19 that all derive from Old World Monkey species naturally infected in a breeding enclosure [ 59 ]. Isolate H95 derived from a naturally infected fox of the Swabian mountains, Germany [ 18 ]. Metacestode tissue was continuously propagated by intraperitoneal passage in Mongolian jirds ( Meriones unguiculatus ) essentially as previously described [ 60 ]. At the time point of these experiments, all isolates except H95 were capable of brood capsule and protoscolex production both in vitro and in vivo . Isolation and cultivation of parasite primary cell cultures was performed essentially as previously described [ 18 , 19 , 60 ]. Axenic cultivation was performed using conditioned medium from rat Reuber cells, nitrogen gas phase, and reducing conditions as previously described [ 60 ] with medium changes every 3 – 4 days. Protoscoleces were isolated from in vivo cultivated parasite material as previously described [ 22 ] and activated by low pH/pepsin/taurocholate treatment as described by Ritler et al. [ 61 ]. Nucleic acid isolation, cloning, and sequencing Total RNA was isolated from specimen using the RNEasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and cDNA was generated using oligonucleotide CD3-RT essentially as previously described [ 23 ]. PCR products were cloned employing the the TOPO TA cloning kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and sequenced by the Sanger method using primers binding to vector sequences adjacent to the cloning sites. In cases of newly described genes, cDNA regions spanning the entire coding region plus 5’ and 3’ non-translated regions, as predicted according to transcriptome data, were PCR amplified using gene specific primers (listed in S2 Table). The corrected full-length sequences of all genes newly characterized in this study were submitted to the GenBank database and are available under the accession numbers listed in S2 Table. In situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry and EdU labelling Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) was performed on in vitro cultivated metacestode vesicles or protoscoleces according to previously established protocols [ 2 , 5 ]. Digoxygenin (DIG)-labeled probes were synthesized by in vitro transcription with T7 and SP6 polymerase (New England Biolabs) using the DIG RNA labelling kit (Roche) from cDNA fragment cloned into vector pJET1.2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Amplification primers for all probes used in this study are listed in S2 Table. After hybridization, all fluorescent specimens were processed and analysed as described [ 40 , 62 ]. Control experiments using labeled sense probes were always negative. In vitro staining of S-phase stem cells was carried out as previously described [ 2 ] using 50 µM 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine (EdU) for a pulse of 5 h after vesicle isolation, followed by fluorescent detection with Alexa Fluor 555 azide as described previously [ 40 , 62 ]. For in situ hybridization on primary cell preparations, the established protocol for metacestode vesicles [ 5 ] was slightly modified by including additional sedimentation steps during washing to avoid material loss. RT-qPCR Total RNA was isolated from primary cell aggregates as described above and cDNA was synthesized as described previously [ 2 ]. qPCR was then performed according to a previously established protocol [ 46 , 63 ] on a StepOne Plus Realtime PCR cycler (Applied Biosystems). Primer sequences for all genes analyzed in this study are listed in S2 Table. The constitutively expressed gene elp (EmuJ_000485800) was used as a control. Cycling conditions were 15 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 sec at 95°C, 20 sec of 58°C, and 20 sec of 72°C. PCR efficiencies were calculated using LinRegPCR [ 64 ], amplification product specificity was assessed by melting curve analysis and gel electrophoresis. Expression levels were calculated by the efficiency correction method using cycle threshold (Ct) values according to [ 63 ]. RNA interference and RNA-Seq sample preparation bcat1 -specific RNAi was carried out on E. multilocularis (isolate: Ingrid) primary cells using a previously established protocol [ 19 ] and siRNAs as listed in S2 Table. siRNAs directed against green fluorescent protein were used as a control. After 7 days of incubation, when the ‘red-dot-phenotype’ was apparent in bcat-1 (RNAi) cultures, samples were collected and further processed for RNA isolation. In a complimentary approach to bcat-1 siRNAs, transient knockdown of bcat-1 gene expression was conducted by electroporation of primary cells using siRNA pools (siTOOLs Biotech GmbH, Martinsried, Germany) which contain up to 30 siRNAs to achieve maximal transcript coverage and minimize off target effects [ 21 ], employing random siRNAs (siTOOLs) as control. In the case of protoscolex preparations, in vivo cultivated parasite material (isolates: MS1010, Ingrid, GH09) was isolated from Mongolian jirds [ 60 ] and protoscoleces were isolated essentially as previously described [ 60 ]. All samples were washed three times with ice-cold PBS (phosphate buffered saline). Samples were then transferred to TRIZOL ®-Reagent (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) and stored at −80°C. Tissue samples were washed with ice-cold PBS before being mechanically homogenized in TRIZOL for 10 seconds. 200 µl of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1) was added and the samples were mixed thoroughly. Phase separation was carried out by centrifugation at 16,000 g at 4°C. 0.5X Isopropanol and 4 µl of glycogen (5mg/ml) were added to the aqueous phase, and the RNA was pelleted by centrifugation at 16,000 g at 4°C for 30 minutes. The resulting pellet was washed with 70% ethanol, air dried, and re-suspended in nuclease-free water. All samples of RNAi treated primary cells, metacestode vesicles, and protoscoleces were set up as three independently prepared biological replicates (n = 3). Library preparation and sequencing Library preparation and sequencing were performed at the Wellcome Sanger Institute essentially as recently described [ 23 ] using the Illumina TruSeq kit. Briefly, polyadenylated mRNA was purified from total RNA using oligo-dT dynabead selection followed by fragmentation by metal ion hydrolysis. First strand synthesis (using random oligonucleotides) was followed by 2nd strand synthesis with RNaseH and DNApolI. Template DNA fragments were end-repaired with T4 and Klenow DNA polymerases and blunt-ended with T4 polynucleotide kinase. A single 3’ adenosine was added to the repaired ends using Klenow exo- and dATP to reduce template concatemerization and adapter dimer formation, and to increase the efficiency of adapter ligation. Adapters containing primer sites for sequencing and index sequences were then ligated. Libraries made with the TruSeq protocol were amplified by PCR to enrich for properly ligated template strands, to generate enough DNA, and to add primers for flow-cell surface annealing, using Kapa HiFi enzyme. AMPure SPRI beads were used to purify amplified templates before pooling based on quantification using an Agilent Bioanalyser chip. Pooled TruSeq libraries were then pooled, and size selected (300 - 400bp fragments) using the Caliper. After adaptor ligation, individual libraries made with the Illumina mRNA-seq kit were size selected using the Caliper before PCR amplification followed by AMPure SPRI bead clean up and removal of adaptors with a second Caliper run. Kapa Illumina SYBR Fast qPCR kit was used to quantify the Illumina mRNA-seq libraries before pooling. Libraries were denatured with 0.1 M sodium hydroxide and diluted to 6 or 8 pM in a hybridization buffer to allow the template strands to hybridize to adapters attached to the flow cell surface. Cluster amplification was performed on the Illumina cBOT using the V4 cluster generation kit following the manufacturer’s protocol and then a SYBR Green QC was performed to measure cluster density and determine whether to pass or fail the flow cell for sequencing, followed by linearization, blocking and hybridization of the R1 sequencing primer. The hybridized flow cells were loaded onto the Illumina sequencing platforms for sequencing-by-synthesis (100 cycles) using the V5 SBS sequencing kit then, in situ , the linearization, blocking and hybridization step was repeated to regenerate clusters, release the second strand for sequencing and to hybridize the R2 sequencing primer followed by another 100 cycles of sequencing to produce paired end reads. These steps were performed using proprietary reagents according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. Data was analysed from the Illumina GAIIx or HiSeq sequencing machines using the RTA1.8 analysis pipelines. Gene finding, annotation, RNA-Seq mapping, and expression level calculation Gene finding, annotation, and mapping of sequencing reads has been performed essentially as recently described [ 23 ]. Mapping of sequencing reads was performed with Hisat2 v2.0.5 [ 65 ] using a maximum intron length of 40,000 base pairs. The number of uniquely mapped reads per transcript was calculated using HTSeqCount v0.7.1 [ 66 ] with a minimum quality score of 30. TPM values (Transcripts Per kilobase Million) were calculated for all transcripts. Differential expression was calculated pairwise between datasets using DESeq2 v1.16.1 [ 67 ] on statistical computation platform R v3.4.3 [ 68 ] with an adjusted p-value cut-off of 0.05. Adjustment for multiple testing was performed using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure after independent filtering with genefilter v1.58.1 [ 68 ] (false discovery rate 0.05). To ascertain quality and correctness of differential expression analysis, fitting of the dispersion curve and outlier detection was assessed by plotting the dispersions (using plotDispEsts function) and the Cook’s distances for each comparison. For improved estimation of actual log2fold changes (FLC), function lfcShrink was used to calculate shrunken maximum a posteriori (MAP) LFCs. For quality control, both unshrunk maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) LFCs and MAP LFCs were visualized by plotting. Unless otherwise indicated, LFC in this work are MAP LFCs. Inhibitor studies Inhibitor studies were performed on mature metacestode vesicles and protoscoleces according to previously established protocols [ 69 ]. To vesicles of about 5 mm diameter, pyrvinium pamoate (MedChemExpress) was added at final concentrations of 20, 200 and 2000 nM (stock solution 100 mM in DMSO). Medium was changed and new inhibitor was added every 2-3 d for up to 7 or 14 d of incubation. In negative controls, only DMSO was added. Structural integrity of the vesicles was monitored daily by light microscopy. For cell proliferation assays, new medium without inhibitor was added at day 7 and the vesicles were allowed to recover for 24 h before undergoing a 5 h EdU incorporation pulse, as previously described [ 69 ]. Protoscoleces were isolated from in vivo cultivated parasite material and activated by low pH/pepsin/taurocholate treatment as previously described [ 60 , 61 ]. After activation, protoscoleces cultures were prepared with media changes and addition of pyrvinium pamoate every 2-3 d for up to 7 d. Morphological changes of protoscoleces were monitored by light microscopy. After treatment protoscoleces were used for WMISH or immunohistochemistry. All experiments were carried out with three biological triplicates and three technical triplicates per metacestode or protoscolex cell culture. Bioinformatic procedures and statistical analyses BLASTP searches were carried out against the E. multilocularis genome (version 5, January 2016) [ 70 ] on WormBase ParaSite [ 71 ] as well as against the SwissProt database as available at GenomeNet ( https://www.genome.jp/ ). Protein domain structure analysis was carried out using SMART 8.0 ( http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/ ). Multiple sequence alignments were performed using Clustal Omega ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/ ) and MEGA 11 software. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (version 9) employing one-way t-test. For statistical analyses on RNAi primary cell cultures, 9 setups of electroporated primary cells (deriving from 3 different primary cell preparations) were analysed and treated as 9 independent biological samples (N = 9). In the case of pyrvinium pamoate treated protoscoleces and metacestode vesicles, 3 independently established cultures (N = 3) were set up in technical triplicates each (n = 3). Mean values of technical triplicates were then used for statistical analysis of biological triplicates. Calculation of EdU+ cells after pyrvinium pamoate treatment was performed as previously described [ 2 ] using vesicles from biological triplicates (N = 3) and counting of EdU+/DAPI+ cells 3 random microscopic fields from 5 vesicles each. Supplementary material captions S1 Figure. Structure and homologies of Echinococcus ndk and ndl ( ndk -like) factors. S2 Figure. Structure and homologies of Echinococcus fst . S3 Figure. qRT-PCR analysis of gene expression after siPOOL RNAi. S4 Figure. Induction of anterior markers in bcat-1 (RNAi) culture aggregates. S5 Figure. Structural features of Echinococcus MUC2. S6 Figure. Structure and homologies of Echinococcus SmadF. S7 Figure. Structure and homologies of Echinococcus Notum. S1 Table. Transcriptomic analyses on bcat-1(RNAi) cultures, protoscoleces, and metacestode vesicles. S2 Table. Oligonucleotide primer sequences for WISH/qRT-PCR and GenBank accession numbers of newly characterized genes. Acknowledgements This work was funded in part supported by the Wellcome Trust grants 206194 and 107475/Z/15/Z as well as a grants from the Wellhöfer foundation (Schwarzenbruck, Germany; grant 824000). MH and KR were supported by personal grants of the German Excellence Initiative to the Graduate School of Life Sciences (GSLS), University of Würzburg. The authors are indebted to Raphael Duvoisin and Dirk Radloff for excellent technical assistance. Funder Information Declared Wellcome Sanger Institute , 206194 , 107475/Z/15/Z Wellhöfer Foundation , 824000 References 1. ↵ Romig T , Deplazes P , Jenkins D , Giraudoux P , Massolo A , Craig PS , et al. Ecology and Life Cycle Patterns of Echinococcus Species . Adv Parasitol . 2017 ; 95 : 213 – 314 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 2. ↵ Koziol U , Rauschendorfer T , Zanon Rodríguez L , Krohne G , Brehm K . The unique stem cell system of the immortal larva of the human parasite Echinococcus multilocularis . Evodevo . 2014 ; 5 ( 1 ): 10 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Brehm K , Koziol U . Echinococcus-Host Interactions at Cellular and Molecular Levels . Adv Parasitol . 2017 ; 95 : 147 – 212 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. ↵ Thompson RCA . Biology and Systematics of Echinococcus . Adv Parasitol . 2017 ; 95 : 65 – 109 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 5. ↵ Koziol U , Jarero F , Olson PD , Brehm K . Comparative analysis of Wnt expression identifies a highly conserved developmental transition in flatworms . BMC Biol . 2016 ; 14 : 10 . 6. ↵ Gottstein B , Soboslay P , Ortona E , Wang J , Siracusano A , Vuitton DΑ. Immunology of Alveolar and Cystic Echinococcosis (AE and CE) . Adv Parasitol . 2017 ; 96 : 1 – 54 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 7. ↵ Kern P , Menezes da Silva A , Akhan O , Müllhaupt B , Vizcaychipi KA , Budke C , et al. The Echinococcoses: Diagnosis, Clinical Management and Burden of Disease . Adv Parasitol . 2017 ; 96 : 259 – 369 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 8. ↵ Slais J . Functional morphology of cestode larvae . Adv Parasitol . 1973 ; 11 : 395 – 480 . OpenUrl PubMed 9. ↵ Rink JC. Stem Cells, Patterning and Regeneration in Planarians: Self-Organization at the Organismal Scale . Methods Mol Biol . 2018 ; 1774 : 57 – 172 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 10. ↵ Gurley KA , Rink JC , Sánchez Alvarado A . Beta-catenin defines head versus tail identity during planarian regeneration and homeostasis . Science . 2008 ; 319 : 323 – 7 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 11. ↵ Almuedo-Castillo M , Sureda-Gómez M , Adell T . Wnt signaling in planarians: new answers to old questions . Int J Dev Biol . 2012 ; 56 : 53 – 65 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 12. ↵ Petersen CP , Reddien PW . Smed-betacatenin-1 is required for anteroposterior blastema polarity in planarian regeneration . Science . 2008 ; 319 : 327 – 30 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 13. ↵ Petersen CP , Reddien PW . Wnt signaling and the polarity of the primary body axis . Cell . 2009 ; 139 : 1056 – 68 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 14. ↵ Scimone ML , Cote LE , Rogers T , Reddien PW . Two FGFRL-Wnt circuits organize the planarian anteroposterior axis . Elife . 2016 ; 5 : e12845 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 15. ↵ Witchley JN , Mayer M , Wagner DE , Owen JH , Reddien PW . Muscle Cells Provide Instructions for Planarian Regeneration . Cell Reports . 2013 ; 4 : 633 – 41 . OpenUrl PubMed 16. ↵ Jarero F , Baillie A , Riddiford N , Montagne J , Koziol U , Olson PD . Muscular remodeling and anteroposterior patterning during tapeworm segmentation . Dev Dyn . 2024 ; 253 : 998 – 1023 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 17. ↵ Montagne J , Preza M , Castillo E , Brehm K , Koziol U . Divergent Axin and GSK-3 paralogs in the beta-catenin destruction complexes of tapeworms . Dev Genes Evol . 2019 ; 229 : 89 – 102 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 18. ↵ Spiliotis M , Lechner S , Tappe D , Scheller C , Krohne G , Brehm K . Transient transfection of Echinococcus multilocularis primary cells and complete in vitro regeneration of metacestode vesicles . Int J Parasitol . 2008 ; 38 : 1025 – 39 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 19. ↵ Spiliotis M , Mizukami C , Oku Y , Kiss F , Brehm K , Gottstein B . Echinococcus multilocularis primary cells: improved isolation, small-scale cultivation and RNA interference . Mol Biochem Parasitol . 2010 ; 174 : 83 – 7 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 20. ↵ Armstrong R , Marks NJ , Geary TG , Harrington J , Selzer PM , Maule AG . Wnt/β-catenin signalling underpins juvenile Fasciola hepatica growth and development . PLoS Pathog. Februar 2025 ; 21 : e1012562 . OpenUrl 21. ↵ Hannus M , Beitzinger M , Engelmann JC , Weickert MT , Spang R , Hannus S , et al. siPools: highly complex but accurately defined siRNA pools eliminate off-target effects . Nucleic Acids Res . 2014 ; 42 : 8049 – 61 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 22. ↵ Koziol U , Krohne G , Brehm K . Anatomy and development of the larval nervous system in Echinococcus multilocularis . Front Zool . 2013 ; 10 ( 1 ): 24 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 23. ↵ Herz M , Zarowiecki M , Wessels L , Pätzel K , Herrmann R , Braun C , et al. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of Echinococcus multilocularis larvae and germinative cell cultures reveals genes involved in parasite stem cell function . Front Cell Infect Microbiol . 2024 ; 14 : 1335946 . OpenUrl PubMed 24. ↵ Hill EM , Petersen CP . Wnt/Notum spatial feedback inhibition controls neoblast differentiation to regulate reversible growth of the planarian brain . Development . 2015 ; 142 : 4217 – 29 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 25. ↵ Zhang B , Abreu JG , Zhou K , Chen Y , Hu Y , Zhou T , et al. Blocking the Wnt pathway, a unifying mechanism for an angiogenic inhibitor in the serine proteinase inhibitor family . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2010 ; 107 : 6900 – 5 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 26. ↵ Filmus J , Capurro M . The role of glypican-3 in the regulation of body size and cancer . Cell Cycle . 2008 ; 7 : 2787 – 90 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 27. ↵ Akheralie Z , Scidmore TJ , Pearson BJ. aristaless-like homeobox-3 is wound induced and promotes a low-Wnt environment required for planarian head regeneration . Development . 2023 ; 150 : dev201777 . OpenUrl PubMed 28. ↵ Vogg MC , Owlarn S , Pérez Rico YA , Xie J , Suzuki Y , Gentile L , et al. Stem cell-dependent formation of a functional anterior regeneration pole in planarians requires Zic and Forkhead transcription factors . Dev Biol . 2014 ; 390 : 136 – 48 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 29. ↵ Perry MW , Bothma JP , Luu RD , Levine M . Precision of hunchback expression in the Drosophila embryo . Curr Biol . 2012 ; 22 : 2247 – 52 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 30. ↵ Nono JK , Lutz MB , Brehm K . Expansion of Host Regulatory T Cells by Secreted Products of the Tapeworm Echinococcus multilocularis . Front Immunol . 2020 ; 11 : 798 . OpenUrl PubMed 31. ↵ Speicher C , Bergmann M , Brehm K . Echinococcus multilocularis delta/notch signalling components are expressed in post-mitotic cells . Parasitol Res . 2024 ; 123 ( 12 ): 418 . OpenUrl PubMed 32. ↵ Díaz A , Casaravilla C , Irigoín F , Lin G , Previato JO , Ferreira F . Understanding the laminated layer of larval Echinococcus I: structure . Trends Parasitol . 2011 ; 27 : 204 – 13 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 33. ↵ Folle AM , Kitano ES , Lima A , Gil M , Cucher M , Mourglia-Ettlin G , et al. Characterisation of Antigen B Protein Species Present in the Hydatid Cyst Fluid of Echinococcus canadensis G7 Genotype . Casulli A , Herausgeber . PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2017 ; 11 : e0005250 . OpenUrl PubMed 34. ↵ Olson PD , Zarowiecki M , Kiss F , Brehm K . Cestode genomics - progress and prospects for advancing basic and applied aspects of flatworm biology . Parasite Immunol . 2012 ; 34 : 130 – 50 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 35. ↵ Lee MG , Oh H , Park JW , You JS , Han JW . Nuclear S6K1 Enhances Oncogenic Wnt Signaling by Inducing Wnt/β-Catenin Transcriptional Complex Formation . Int J Mol Sci . 18. Dezember 2022 ; 23 ( 24 ): 16143 . OpenUrl PubMed 36. ↵ Reddien PW . The Cellular and Molecular Basis for Planarian Regeneration . Cell . 2018 ; 175 : 327 – 45 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 37. ↵ Lander R , Petersen CP. Wnt, Ptk7, and FGFRL expression gradients control trunk positional identity in planarian regeneration . eLife . 2016 ; 5 : e12850 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 38. ↵ Gaviño MA , Wenemoser D , Wang IE , Reddien PW . Tissue absence initiates regeneration through follistatin-mediated inhibition of activin signaling . Elife . 2013 ; 2 : e00247 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 39. ↵ Roberts-Galbraith RH , Newmark PA . Follistatin antagonizes activin signaling and acts with notum to direct planarian head regeneration . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2013 ; 110 ( 4 ): 1363 – 8 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 40. ↵ Kaethner M , Epping K , Bernthaler P , Rudolf K , Thomann I , Leitschuh N , et al. Transforming growth factor-β signalling regulates protoscolex formation in the Echinococcus multilocularis metacestode . Front Cell Infect Microbiol . 2023 ; 13 : 1153117 . OpenUrl PubMed 41. ↵ Förster S , Koziol U , Schäfer T , Duvoisin R , Cailliau K , Vanderstraete M , et al. The role of fibroblast growth factor signalling in Echinococcus multilocularis development and host-parasite interaction . PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2019 ; 13 : e0006959 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 42. ↵ Schultz CW , Nevler A. Pyrvinium Pamoate: Past, Present, and Future as an Anti-Cancer Drug . Biomedicines . 2022 ; 10 : 3249 . OpenUrl PubMed 43. ↵ Koziol U . Evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) of cestodes . Exp Parasitol . 2017 ; 180 : 84 – 100 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 44. ↵ Mizukami C , Spiliotis M , Gottstein B , Yagi K , Katakura K , Oku Y . Gene silencing in Echinococcus multilocularis protoscoleces using RNA interference . Parasitol Int . 2010 ; 59 : 647 – 52 . OpenUrl PubMed 45. ↵ Shi Q , Liu C , Huo L , Tao Y , Zhang H . Silencing TUBB3 Expression Destroys the Tegument and Flame Cells of Echinococcus multilocularis Protoscoleces . Animals (Basel ). 2022 ; 12 ( 18 ): 2471 . OpenUrl PubMed 46. ↵ Pérez MG , Spiliotis M , Rego N , Macchiaroli N , Kamenetzky L , Holroyd N , et al. Deciphering the role of miR-71 in Echinococcus multilocularis early development in vitro . PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2019 ; 13 : e0007932 . OpenUrl PubMed 47. ↵ Cloutier JK , McMann CL , Oderberg IM , Reddien PW. activin-2 is required for regeneration of polarity on the planarian anterior-posterior axis . PLoS Genet . 2021 ; 17 : e1009466 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 48. ↵ Tang Y , Liu Z , Zhao L , Clemens TL , Cao X . Smad7 stabilizes beta-catenin binding to E-cadherin complex and promotes cell-cell adhesion . J Biol Chem . 2008 ; 283 : 23956 – 63 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 49. ↵ Xie Z , Chen Y , Li Z , Bai G , Zhu Y , Yan R , et al. Smad6 promotes neuronal differentiation in the intermediate zone of the dorsal neural tube by inhibition of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2011 ; 108 : 12119 – 24 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 50. ↵ Díaz Á , Fernández C , Pittini Á , Seoane PI , Allen JE , Casaravilla C . The laminated layer: Recent advances and insights into Echinococcus biology and evolution . Exp Parasitol . 2015 ; 158 : 23 – 30 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 51. ↵ Silva-Álvarez V , Franchini GR , Pórfido JL , Kennedy MW , Ferreira AM , Córsico B . Lipid-free antigen B subunits from echinococcus granulosus: oligomerization, ligand binding, and membrane interaction properties . PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2015 ; 9 : e0003552 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 52. ↵ Cadigan KM , Waterman ML . TCF/LEFs and Wnt signaling in the nucleus . Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol . 2012 ; 4 : a007906 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 53. ↵ van Kappel EC , Maurice MM . Molecular regulation and pharmacological targeting of the β-catenin destruction complex . Br J Pharmacol . 2017 ; 174 : 4575 – 88 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 54. ↵ Nanista EM , Poythress LE , Skipper IR , Haskins T , Cora MF , Rozario T . Anterior-posterior polarity signals differentially regulate regeneration-competence of the tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta . bioRxiv . 2025 ; 2025.03.11.642590 . 55. ↵ Kreshchenko ND . Functions of flatworm neuropeptides NPF, GYIRF and FMRF in course of pharyngeal regeneration of anterior body fragments of planarian, Girardia tigrina . Acta Biol Hung . 2008 ; 59 Suppl : 199 – 207 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 56. Collins JJ , Hou X , Romanova EV , Lambrus BG , Miller CM , Saberi A , et al. Genome-wide analyses reveal a role for peptide hormones in planarian germline development . PLoS Biol . 2010 ; 8 : e1000509 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 57. ↵ Saberi A , Jamal A , Beets I , Schoofs L , Newmark PA . GPCRs Direct Germline Development and Somatic Gonad Function in Planarians . PLoS Biol . 2016 ; 14 : e1002457 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 58. ↵ Koziol U , Koziol M , Preza M , Costábile A , Brehm K , Castillo E . De novo discovery of neuropeptides in the genomes of parasitic flatworms using a novel comparative approach . Int J Parasitol . 2016 ; 46 : 709 – 21 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 59. ↵ Tappe D , Brehm K , Frosch M , Blankenburg A , Schrod A , Kaup FJ , et al. Echinococcus multilocularis infection of several Old World monkey species in a breeding enclosure . Am J Trop Med Hyg . 2007 ; 77 : 504 – 6 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 60. ↵ Spiliotis M , Brehm K . Axenic in vitro cultivation of Echinococcus multilocularis metacestode vesicles and the generation of primary cell cultures . Methods Mol Biol . 2009 ; 470 : 245 – 62 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 61. ↵ Ritler D , Rufener R , Sager H , Bouvier J , Hemphill A , Lundström-Stadelmann B . Development of a movement-based in vitro screening assay for the identification of new anti-cestodal compounds . PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2017 ; 11 : e0005618 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 62. ↵ Koike A , Becker F , Sennhenn P , Kim J , Zhang J , Hannus S , et al. Targeting Echinococcus multilocularis PIM kinase for improving anti-parasitic chemotherapy . PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2022 ; 16 : e0010483 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 63. ↵ Ancarola ME , Lichtenstein G , Herbig J , Holroyd N , Mariconti M , Brunetti E , et al. Extracellular non-coding RNA signatures of the metacestode stage of Echinococcus multilocularis . PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2020 ; 14 : e0008890 . OpenUrl PubMed 64. ↵ Untergasser A , Ruijter JM , Benes V , van den Hoff MJB . Web-based LinRegPCR: application for the visualization and analysis of (RT)-qPCR amplification and melting data . BMC Bioinformatics . 2021 ; 22 : 398 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 65. ↵ Kim D , Langmead B , Salzberg SL . HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements . Nat Methods . 2015 ; 12 : 357 – 60 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 66. ↵ Anders S , Pyl PT , Huber W . HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data . Bioinformatics . 2015 ; 31 : 166 – 9 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 67. ↵ Love MI , Huber W , Anders S . Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2 . Genome Biol . 2014 ; 15 : 550 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 68. ↵ Huber W , Carey VJ , Gentleman R , Anders S , Carlson M , Carvalho BS , et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor . Nat Methods . 2015 ; 12 : 115 – 21 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 69. ↵ Schubert A , Koziol U , Cailliau K , Vanderstraete M , Dissous C , Brehm K . Targeting Echinococcus multilocularis stem cells by inhibition of the Polo-like kinase EmPlk1 . PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2014 ; 8 : e2870 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 70. ↵ Tsai IJ , Zarowiecki M , Holroyd N , Garciarrubio A , Sánchez-Flores A , Brooks KL , et al. The genomes of four tapeworm species reveal adaptations to parasitism . Nature . 2013 ; 496 : 57 – 63 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 71. ↵ Howe KL , Bolt BJ , Cain S , Chan J , Chen WJ , Davis P , et al. WormBase 2016: expanding to enable helminth genomic research . Nucleic Acids Res . 2016 ; 44 : D774 – 780 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted September 17, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Canonical WNT signalling governs Echinococcus metacestode development Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Canonical WNT signalling governs Echinococcus metacestode development Ruth Herrmann , Luisa Schiegl , Michaela Herz , Kilian Rudolf , Akito Koike , Markus Spiliotis , Monika Bergmann , Nancy Holroyd , Uriel Koziol , Matt Berriman , Klaus Brehm bioRxiv 2025.09.17.676774; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.17.676774 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Canonical WNT signalling governs Echinococcus metacestode development Ruth Herrmann , Luisa Schiegl , Michaela Herz , Kilian Rudolf , Akito Koike , Markus Spiliotis , Monika Bergmann , Nancy Holroyd , Uriel Koziol , Matt Berriman , Klaus Brehm bioRxiv 2025.09.17.676774; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.17.676774 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Developmental Biology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7629) Biochemistry (17660) Bioengineering (13881) Bioinformatics (41911) Biophysics (21436) Cancer Biology (18578) Cell Biology (25482) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13371) Ecology (19887) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24302) Genetics (15599) Genomics (22483) Immunology (17728) Microbiology (40364) Molecular Biology (17163) Neuroscience (88537) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2830) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4821) Physiology (7637) Plant Biology (15129) Scientific Communication and Education (2045) Synthetic Biology (4290) Systems Biology (9817) Zoology (2269)