[History of Romanian Surgery]

Review OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-10 ⓘ

This review analyzes hysteroscopic endometrial ablation compared to medical treatment for menorrhagia, concluding that hysteroscopic methods should be considered for dysfunctional uterine bleeding.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Hysterectomy begins to fail as an absolute treatment for menorrhagia, as new medical and conservative treatment occurs. The author analyzes literature data of efficiency of hysteroscopic endometrial ablation compared with medical treatment, as well as among different hysteroscopic techniques. In conclusion, considering the expansion of hysteroscopic methods, gynaecologists should consider revising the treatment option in dysfunctional uterine bleeding, and offer to the patients the option of endometrial ablation.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

General Surgery General Surgery History, 20th Century Humans Research Research Romania Schools, Medical Schools, Medical

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:00:31.392641+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK