Variant Scientists in Genomic Medicine: Survey of Demographics, Training, Duties, and Professional Development

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 3,219 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose Genomic testing has proven utility in disease diagnostics, guiding clinical management and improving outcomes. Use of high throughput sequencing by clinical laboratories has generated opportunities and challenges in data analysis resulting in the emergence of a laboratory role termed Variant Scientist. The aim of this study was to characterize this laboratory role.

Methods

We developed a thirty-item survey to collect information describing the current demographic landscape, salary ranges, work environments, training options, and professional development of Variant Scientists. The survey was disseminated to individuals conducting variant analysis in the United States from November 6, 2023, to March 15, 2024.

Results

Survey responders (n=87) are predominantly female (78%), age 40 or less (64%), hold advanced degrees (92%), and report four or more years of experience (75%). Responders report involvement in a diverse set of laboratory tasks and received relevant training on the job (78%). This workforce is satisfied with their career path (70%) and reports adequate support from employers. They note that resources and recognition from professional organizations are currently lacking.

Conclusions

Variant Scientists are a group of diverse genetics professionals that are highly educated and perform a variety of complex tasks within a clinical genomics laboratory. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement This project was supported by the Department of Pathology and Immunology at the Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The review board at the Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine (IRB ID: 202310106) approved and monitored the study. Completion of the survey by participants was considered implied consent. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00