Clinical Value Analysis of Combined Vaginal Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Dispersion Weighted Imaging, and Multilayer Spiral CT in the Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer Using Deep VGG-16 AdaBoost Hybrid Classifier
article
OA: hybrid
CC0
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma is one of the most common disorders of the female reproductive system. Every year, around 76,000 women die from endometrial cancer around the world. Endometrial cancer is a significant factor in women's health, particularly in industrialized nations, where the prevalence of this tumor type is the greatest. It is an important concern in women's health because of disease mortality and the rising number of new diagnoses. The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical value of combined transvaginal ultrasound, magnetic resonance dispersion weighted imaging, and multilayer spiral computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of early-stage endometrial cancer. Initially, the dataset is collected that consisted of a total of 100 cases and split into the control group and experimental group of 50 cases in each group. The control group is diagnosed using conventional Doppler ultrasound diagnostic machine. The experimental group is diagnosed with combined ultrasound method. The ultrasound images thus obtained are preprocessed using the speckle-free adaptive wiener filter. The preprocessed images are segmented using the fuzzy clustering segmentation method. The features are extracted by the independent component analysis (ICA) method. We have proposed the deep VGG-16 AdaBoost hybrid classifier for classifying the normal and abnormal images. The clinical value of the diagnosis is analyzed using the parameters like diagnostic accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and kappa coefficient. It is observed that the clinical value is better for the experimental group than the control group.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (22)
- W1985262162 via openalex
- W2046150410 via openalex
- W2079085536 via openalex
- W2170352900 via openalex
- W2210737500 via openalex
- W2623649310 via openalex
- W2713621837 via openalex
- W2773358534 via openalex
- W2800343705 via openalex
- W2800947705 via openalex
- W2810695019 via openalex
- W2887690102 via openalex
- W2887706588 via openalex
- W2897596953 via openalex
- W2910435846 via openalex
- W2936256714 via openalex
- W2944152232 via openalex
- W2971379849 via openalex
- W2990485971 via openalex
- W3111312324 via openalex
- W3205219229 via openalex
- W3206086863 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK