Full text
8,112 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Relationship between spatial and social phenotypes in an avian scavenger | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 4 February 2026 V2 Latest version Share on Relationship between spatial and social phenotypes in an avian scavenger Authors : Kaija Gahm 0000-0002-4612-4426 [email protected] , Marta Acácio , Nili Anglister , Gideon Vaadia , Orr Spiegel 0000-0001-8941-3175 , and Noa Pinter-Wollman 0000-0002-0448-8037 Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174644925.54956583/v2 330 views 248 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Animals may interact incidentally, by sharing space, or intentionally, by seeking out interactions. Understanding which elements of social interactions can be explained by spatial behavior and which cannot may uncover drivers of individual fitness and population functioning. In an avian scavenger, we tested how space use covaried with social position while flying, feeding, and roosting. We also identified the deviation of observed social centrality from chance and examined how this non-incidental social centrality covaried with space use. In flight, space use was positively associated only with observed social centrality, suggesting that interactions while flying emerge primarily from co-movement. In contrast, space use covaried with non-incidental social centrality while roosting, suggesting a stronger importance of social preferences when interacting at roost sites. Our work demonstrates that the role of animal movements in shaping social interactions differs across social situations. Such an understanding of the spatial-social interface is essential for predicting population responses to environmental changes and conserving threatened species. Animals may interact incidentally, by sharing space, or intentionally (by seeking out interactions). Untangling social and non-social interaction drivers is essential for understanding the spatial-social interface, which influences individual fitness and population functioning. In an avian scavenger, we tested how space use covaried with social position while flying, feeding, and roosting. We identified the deviation of observed sociality from chance and examined how this intentional sociality covaried with space use. Space use was positively associated only with observed social position in flight, suggesting these interactions emerge primarily from spatial overlap. In contrast, space use covaried with intentional roost sociality, indicating greater importance of social preferences at roosts. This work demonstrates how distinguishing intentional and incidental encounters reveals environmental and social drivers of behavior, and how those differ across social contexts. Such mechanistic understanding of the spatial-social interface is essential for predicting population responses to environmental changes and conserving threatened species. Supplementary Material File (gahm_etal_preprint.pdf) Download 4.33 MB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 05 May 2025 V2 Version 2 04 February 2026 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords behavior conspecific attraction environment movement social interactions social networks social preference space use spatial vulture Authors Affiliations Kaija Gahm 0000-0002-4612-4426 [email protected] UCLA View all articles by this author Marta Acácio Tel Aviv University School of Zoology View all articles by this author Nili Anglister Tel Aviv University View all articles by this author Gideon Vaadia Tel Aviv University School of Zoology View all articles by this author Orr Spiegel 0000-0001-8941-3175 Tel Aviv University View all articles by this author Noa Pinter-Wollman 0000-0002-0448-8037 UCLA View all articles by this author Funding Information National Science Foundation 2015662 Noa Pinter-Wollman and Orr Spiegel United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation 2019822 Orr Spiegel and Noa Pinter-Wollman National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program DGE-2034835 Kaija Gahm Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 330 views 248 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Kaija Gahm, Marta Acácio, Nili Anglister, et al. Relationship between spatial and social phenotypes in an avian scavenger. Authorea . 04 February 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174644925.54956583/v2 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.174644925.54956583/v2","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe1a9beff15c13d',t:'MTc3OTE3ODYyMw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.