Comparing the predictive value of plasma p-tau217 and CSF biomarkers (p-tau181, Aβ42) using amyloid positron emission tomography in Alzheimer's continuum

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 125,327 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Comparing the predictive value of plasma p-tau217 and CSF biomarkers (p-tau181, Aβ42) using amyloid positron emission tomography in Alzheimer's continuum | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Comparing the predictive value of plasma p-tau217 and CSF biomarkers (p-tau181, Aβ42) using amyloid positron emission tomography in Alzheimer's continuum Mohammad Hossein Azaraein, Elham Zarrazvand, Fatemeh Heydari, and 10 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7327653/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract INTRODUCTION: This study explores the diagnostic accuracy of different biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) using data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed on individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Key biomarkers assessed included plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181, CSF Aβ42, and amyloid PET imaging, alongside clinical assessments using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS). RESULTS: Plasma p-tau217 showed the strongest correlation with amyloid-β deposition and clinical scores (Adjusted R² = 0.53 for ADAS, 0.51 for CDR), outperforming CSF Aβ42 and CSF p-tau181. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that plasma p-tau217 may serve as a more accurate, cost-effective, and non-invasive alternative to CSF biomarkers and PET imaging. Its superior predictive power highlights its potential in routine clinical settings for early diagnosis and monitoring of AD progression, addressing key challenges in accessibility and patient compliance associated with current diagnostic methods. Health sciences/Biomarkers Health sciences/Neurology Biological sciences/Neuroscience Alzheimer’s Disease Positron emission tomography Phosphorylated-tau Plasma biomarker β-amyloid cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers cognitive impairment Figures Figure 1 1. Introduction Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent form of dementia, affecting approximately 50 million people worldwide, and this number is expected to triple by 2050, exacerbating the risks of disability, disease burden, and healthcare expenditure ( 1 ). AD is characterized by the abnormal accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides and hyperphosphorylation of tau. Aβ deposition, occurring decades before the onset of clinical symptoms of AD, represents the earliest detectable pathological hallmark ( 2 , 3 ). The Aβ hypothesis posits that the accumulation of Aβ peptides, primarily Aβ40 and Aβ42, is the principal factor in AD pathogenesis. The deposition of Aβ peptides occurs mainly in the hippocampus, neocortex, and cerebrovascular regions, correlating with the distribution of senile plaques ( 4 ). Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is an advanced non-invasive diagnostic method for AD is a utilizes radiopharmaceutical method performs by using several radiotracers such as 11C-Pittsburgh compound B and 18F-labeled compounds that selectively bind to Aβ plaques, evaluating Aβ plaque deposition in the brain's grey matter, which is one of the earliest detectable changes in AD diagnosis ( 5 , 6 ). Recent advances in AD diagnosis have introduced biomarkers capable of identifying AD pathologies, similarly to how accurate Aβ and tau burdens are detected via PET or CSF analysis. It has been proven that biomarkers derived from plasma, urine, or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are pivotal in disease diagnosis, prognosis, and contribute significantly to the advancement of new drug therapies ( 7 ). For instance, CSF biomarkers such as total tau (t-tau), phosphorylated tau (p-tau), and the 42-amino acid isoform of Aβ (Aβ1–42) are favorable, as elevated t-tau, p-tau181, p-tau217 levels and reduced Aβ1–42 are observed in many diagnosed patients ( 8 ). Blood-based biomarkers provide less invasive and more affordable options compared to neuroimaging and CSF biomarkers, while due to the invasiveness of lumbar punctures, considerable costs, and the specialized facilities required for PET imaging, these approaches are restricted and lead to major worries for patients and limited accessibility ( 9 , 10 ). It is noteworthy to mention that blood biomarkers are increasingly valuable for trial recruitment, diagnosis, and disease monitoring, potentially reducing the need for confirmatory CSF or PET scans ( 7 , 11 ). Moreover, because of minimal fold-change between amyloid PET-positive and -negative in patients, the reliability of the plasma Aβ42/40 ratio is inadequate for clinical investigations. In contrast, p-tau blood tests show a significant increase of 100–400% in AD patients, aligning with extracellular Aβ plaque pathology, which can be used as a defining hallmark of AD. This makes the p-tau one of the best contenders among novel AD blood tests, offering superior diagnostic accuracy and disease specificity to other known blood biomarkers. Therefore, p-tau, especially p-tau217, is recognized as the primary blood biomarker for AD pathology across all disease stages and exhibits high performance in distinguishing AD from other neurodegenerative diseases and detecting AD pathology in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) ( 12 – 14 ). This study aims to validate plasma p-tau217, specifically its accuracy as a predictive biomarker for Aβ burden in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease. We hypothesize that plasma p-tau217 outperforms classic CSF biomarkers in predicting cerebral amyloid levels. Utilizing the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis comparing CSF biomarkers (p-tau181, Aβ42) with p-tau217 in predicting Aβ deposition in the brain. 2. Method 2.1. Participants The data employed in this study were obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, which is available at ( http://adni.loni.usc.edu ). Launched in 2003, ADNI runs as a partnership between the public and private sectors under the guidance of Principal Investigator Michael W. Weiner, MD. The primary objective of ADNI has been to assess the PET and additional biological biomarkers alongside neuropsychological assessments to monitor the progression of MCI and early AD. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for ADNI participants are comprehensively detailed in other publications ( 15 , 16 ). In summary, eligible individuals, aged 55 to 90, underwent various assessments, including neuroimaging, lumbar punctures, and longitudinal follow-ups. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. For this investigation, we included participants classified as EMCI (early mild cognitive impairment) and LMCI (late mild cognitive impairment) from the ADNI cohort. We had access to all demographic information (such as gender, age, and education), CSF biomarkers (P-tau181 and Aβ42), plasma biomarker (p-tau217), and neuropsychological assessments, including the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale 11 (ADAS-11) and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Additionally, we collected data from individuals who had undergone comprehensive amyloid PET data using [18F] florbetapir (FBP) smoothed to a uniform resolution of 6 mm. All datasets used for this study and the corresponding access dates are listed in Table S1 . The study ultimately included a total of 30 participants, with 14 classified as EMCI and 16 as LMCI subjects. 2.2. Cognitive Assessments Our study utilized two assessment methods, CDR (Clinical Dementia Rating) ( 17 , 18 ) and ADAS-11 (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale) ( 19 , 20 ), to evaluate the extent of cognitive and non-cognitive dysfunction in individuals exhibiting signs of the dementia spectrum. CDR is a scale that can determine the degree of dysfunction in six domains of cognitive and non-cognitive performance associated with dementia spectrum disorders, such as AD. These domains are memory, orientation, problem-solving, home and hobbies, community affairs, and personal care. Each domain is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates no impairment and 3 indicates severe impairment in the assessed function. The only exception is personal care, which is assessed on a 4-point scale without a 0.5 rating. The ratings are derived from a semi-structured interview conducted by a professional with the patient and reliable informants. The ADAS-11 consists of two parts: cognitive and non-cognitive testing. It was originally designed to measure the severity of cognitive and non-cognitive dysfunction in individuals with AD. The cognitive subscale, known as ADAS-Cog, is more commonly used and apart from assessing memory, praxis, language, and orientation, it encompasses specific tasks such as word recall and recognition, object and finger naming, and following commands. The assessment typically requires up to 45 minutes to complete, and the total score ranges from 0 to 70, with a higher score indicating greater cognitive impairment. 2.3. Plasma p-tau217 and CSF Biomarkers Measurements Plasma p-tau217 was quantified in samples from the ADNI2/3 cohort using a standardized protocol developed with Janssen R&D. Measurements were performed on the Simoa HD-X platform with a three-step assay targeting p-tau217 and total tau, employing pT3 and hT43 antibodies specific to amino acids 210–220. The assay was calibrated with synthetic peptides (0.002–10 pg/mL) and used K2-EDTA plasma at a 1:2 dilution (linear up to 1:16). Validation confirmed high sensitivity, accuracy, and precision (intra-assay CV: 5.06 ± 4.09%; inter-assay CV: 4.16 ± 6.78%), along with sample stability across multiple conditions ( 21 ). CSF biomarkers—Aβ42 and p-tau181—were measured to assess brain amyloid and tau pathology. Reduced Aβ levels indicate amyloid plaque accumulation, a hallmark of AD, while elevated p-tau181 reflect neurofibrillary tangles and neurodegeneration, respectively. Concentrations were determined using the INNO-BIA AlzBio3 assay (Fujirebio Europe), a Research Use Only (RUO) multiplex immunoassay on the Luminex platform, enabling simultaneous and precise quantification. The assay’s performance was validated with non-ADNI CSF samples, showing reliable within-laboratory precision but variable inter-laboratory reproducibility with ADNI1 CSF. A linear regression-based rescaling method was applied to mitigate kit-to-kit variability, using fresh ADNI baseline CSF aliquots to align subsequent batch results with original values, ensuring consistency and reproducibility ( 21 ). 2.4. Amyloid PET Measurements Amyloid PET data were obtained using the Laboratory of Neuro Imaging (LONI) pipeline, incorporating tracers such as [18F] florbetapir (FBP). Amyloid burden was assessed in the cortical summary region, normalized by the whole cerebellum reference region. PET images were co-registered to compute regional Standardized Uptake Value Ratios (SUVRs). Amyloid positivity or negativity was determined using composite reference thresholds of 0.78 SUVR for FBP and 0.74 SUVR for FBB in 6-mm datasets 2.6. Statistical Analysis Data were matched based on exam dates, visit codes, and variable values (e.g., plasma p-tau217, Aβ PET, CDR). Outliers were removed, and data were standardized using z-score normalization prior to analysis. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted using Python (with pandas, NumPy, Matplotlib, and Seaborn packages). Six models were developed to assess the predictive value of plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181, and CSF Aβ42 for Aβ PET scores (SUVR/WC), with age, gender, and cognitive scores (CDR or ADAS) included as covariates. Each model evaluated one biomarker as the primary predictor, adjusting for the specified covariates, and results were compared across models to determine relative predictive performance. 3. Result 3.1. Data pre-processing A cross-sectional study was conducted to identify individuals with complete records of plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181, CSF Aβ42, and summary SUVR normalized with the whole cerebellum (WC) by considering CDR and ADAS as cognitive scores. Among all the participants, thirty contributors met our necessary inclusion criteria for the study. Due to the clinical significance of degeneration changes, Evaluations were conducted at either 48 or 60 months, with the majority of patients visited at 48 months from 2016 to 2017. 3.2. Demographic characteristics of participants We investigated patients containing 63% males and 37% females, diagnosed with either EMCI (47%) or LMCI (53%), with a mean age of 72 ± 6.4 years. Table 1 presents a summary of participants' demographic data comprising CDR and ADAS scores, plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181, and CSF Aβ42 levels. Table 1 Demographics and clinical features Variables Mean ± SD/frequency Age (years) 72 ± 6.4 Gender (Female, Male,%) 37%, 63% EMCI, LMCI (%) 47%, 53% CDR 1.59 ± 2.2 ADAS-11 9.34 ± 7.8 plasma p-tau217 0.076 ± 0.05 CSF Aβ42 1113.6 ± 649 CSF p-tau181 33.2 ± 17.6 SUVR/WC 1.2 ± 0.23 Abbreviations: EMCI: early mild cognitive impairment; LMCI: Late Mild Cognitive Impairment; CDR: The Clinical Dementia Rating; ADAS: The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale; p-tau: phosphorylated tau; SUVR: Standardized Uptake Value Ratios; WC: whole cerebellum. 3.3. CDR-adjusted Models After adjusting for age, gender and CDR, multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the predictive value of biomarkers, considering SUVR/WC as the dependent criterion (Table 2 ). Our analysis demonstrated that our three biomarkers, including plasma p-tau217 (p < 0.001, Adj-R²=0.51), CSF p-tau181 (p < 0.001, Adj-R²=0.43), and CSF Aβ42 (p < 0.001, Adj-R² =0.42), were significantly predictive for Aβ burden in the cognitively impaired Individuals. Table 2 Multiple Linear Regression Analysis using CDR Predictor variables Coeff SE P-value Adj-R² Model 1 Plasma p-tau217 0.81 0.20 < 0.001 0.51 Age 0.09 0.14 0.51 Gender -0.19 0.28 0.49 CDR -0.05 0.08 0.51 Intercept 0.19 0.24 0.45 Model 2 CSF p-tau181 0.03 0.01 < 0.001 0.42 Age 0.13 0.15 0.37 Gender -0.48 0.31 0.14 CDR 0.12 0.06 0.05 Intercept -1.00 0.31 0.00 Model 3 CSF Aβ42 -0.50 0.15 < 0.001 0.43 Age 0.14 0.15 0.35 Gender -0.01 0.31 0.98 CDR 0.12 0.06 0.05 Intercept -0.27 0.23 0.25 Abbreviation: Coeff; Coefficient, SE; Standard error, Adj-R²; Adjusted R-squared, CSF; Cerebrospinal fluid, CDR; Clinical Dementia Rating. 3.4. ADAS-adjusted Models In the following, by adjusting for age, gender and ADAS, multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess the prediction rate of biomarkers' effects on Aβ-pet scan score (Table 3 ). Our analyses showed that collected biomarkers were significantly predictive of Aβ deposition in the brain tissue [plasma p-tau217 (p < 0.001, Adj-R²=0.53), CSF Aβ42 (p < 0.001, Adj-R²=0.32), and CSF p-tau181 (p < 0.001, Adj-R²=0.37)]. Table 3 Multiple Linear Regression Analysis using ADAS Predictor variables Coeff SE P-value Adj-R² Model 4 Plasma p-tau217 0.82 0.16 < 0.001 0.53 Age 0.07 0.13 0.61 Gender -0.23 0.28 0.42 ADAS -0.19 0.16 0.25 Intercept 0.08 0.16 0.61 Model 5 CSF p-tau181 0.03 0.01 < 0.001 0.32 Age 0.17 0.16 0.30 Gender -0.60 0.35 0.09 ADAS 0.03 0.18 0.87 Intercept -0.84 0.35 0.02 Model 6 CSF Aβ42 -0.56 0.16 < 0.001 0.37 Age 0.18 0.15 0.26 Gender 0.01 0.33 0.98 ADAS 0.20 0.15 0.20 Intercept -0.00 0.19 0.99 Abbreviation: Coeff; Coefficient, SE; Standard error, Adj-R²; Adjusted R-squared, CSF; Cerebrospinal fluid, ADAS; Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale. 3.5. Predictive Accuracy of Plasma Tau217, CSF P-tau181 and CSF Aβ42 Biomarkers By performing multiple linear regression analyses, after adjusting for demographic features, we tested the predictive ability of plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181, and CSF Aβ42 for assessing the accumulation of Aβ plaques using Aβ PET (SUVR/WC score). As we found, collected biomarkers had a remarkable relation with the Aβ deposition, showing significant predictive value. According to the analyses, plasma p-tau217 with a higher level of determination was the most powerful predictor in these analyses (Adj-R²=0.53 for ADAS and Adj-R²=0.51 for CDR). As the figure shows, after adjusting for demographic features and cognition scores, Aβ deposition in the brain is meaningfully associated with the biomarkers. It indicates that an increase in plasma p-tau217 and CSF p-tau181 is correlated with enhancing the rate of Aβ burden in the brain tissue and CSF Aβ42 has an inverse concomitant with Aβ deposition. 4. Discussion 4.1. Interpretation This study evaluated the predictive accuracy of three biomarkers, including plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181, and CSF Aβ42 and brain Aβ deposition measured by SUVR/WC in individuals with EMCI and LMCI. We evaluated each biomarker’s value in indicating brain Aβ pathology and their respective roles in diagnosing and the progression of AD. Our findings demonstrated a strong positive correlation between each of the biomarkers (plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181 and CSF Aβ42) and brain Aβ burden (p < 0.001), highlighting their predictive value in Aβ pathology. Meanwhile, plasma p-tau217 emerged as the strongest predictor of brain Aβ deposition, showing the highest Adj-R² value after being adjusted for confounders, including age, gender, and cognitive scores (ADAS and CDR). These findings underscore plasma p-tau217's potential as a reliable indicator of AD pathology in the early stages, as supported by multiple regression models. As many studies have implied that CSF Aβ42 decreases during the development of AD, even preceding cognitive symptoms or Aβ-PET changes, its efficiency has been challenged by the research, demonstrating higher specificity for other biomarkers, such as tau proteins and neurofilament light chains in differentiating AD from other dementias ( 22 – 25 ). Moreover, CSF Aβ reduction can also occur in various neurodegenerative disorders, limiting its diagnostic precision, such as frontotemporal dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, vascular dementia, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and also it may also appear in individuals who never progress to AD clinical symptoms ( 26 , 27 ). The adversity of CSF Aβ as a specific AD biomarker has led to increased interest in p-tau markers. Tau staging shows site-specific phosphorylation changes correlating with disease progression, structural, metabolic, neurodegenerative, and clinical disease indicators. The accumulation of p-tau217 and p-tau181 may begin concurrently with early Aβ aggregation, up to two decades before tau pathology becomes apparent ( 28 ). Lai et al (2024) proved that plasma p-tau217 and p-tau181 have a great association with amyloid-PET status that can predict amyloid positivity. Besides, plasma epitopes of p-tau, such as 217 and 181, indicated a great relationship with their CSF levels, specifically for p-tau217. Due to the specificity and reliability of p-tau217 compared to other p-tau species found in previous studies, it can be used as the most suggestive predictor for diagnosis and progression analysis of AD ( 29 ), especially when plasma p-tau217 has the ability to predict long-term cognitive impairment in preclinical AD ( 30 , 31 ). Given these findings, plasma p-tau217 emerges as a clinically relevant biomarker. Unlike CSF biomarkers that require invasive lumbar punctures with associated risks such as infection and bleeding, or PET imaging, which are often impractical for routine use in primary care settings, plasma p-tau217 can be measured through a simple blood draw and lead to a reduction in the necessity for confirmatory testing. This minimally invasive approach significantly reduces patient discomfort while enabling more frequent and accessible monitoring of individuals at risk for AD ( 32 , 33 ). In the present study, the predictive value of CSF-Aβ42 and CSF p-tau181 were remarkable, as it was in line with previous studies ( 34 , 35 ). Furthermore, we found that plasma p-tau217 biomarker exhibited greater results than CSF p-tau181 and CSF Aβ42 biomarkers, considering their significancy and higher Adj-R² values for plasma p-tau217, which means plasma p-tau217 had stronger accuracy levels to be a stronger predictor of cognitive impairments and Aβ-PET positivity in the AD continuum. Our results were consistent with previous studies demonstrated that plasma p-tau217 accurately predicts abnormal Aβ status as well as CSF biomarkers in detecting Aβ burden in the brain and the upcoming onset of AD dementia in individuals with MCI ( 36 – 38 ). Likewise, in a meta-analysis, Qu et al (2021) confirmed the higher specificity of plasma p-tau217 in the diagnosis of AD compared to p-tau181 and p-tau231. It shows that plasma p-tau217 provided a superior indicator for AD detection and had better discriminative accuracy for MCI than p-tau181 and p-tau231 ( 38 , 39 ). 4.2. Limitations and strengths A relatively small sample size in our study may somewhat interfere with the generalizability of the results to a broader MCI population, particularly those outside the ADNI cohort. The cross-sectional design limits the ability to observe temporal changes in biomarker levels and disease progression over time, which would provide valuable insights into longitudinal dynamics. Additionally, our focus on MCI participants from the ADNI database may not capture the entire spectrum of cognitive decline associated with AD. Despite these limitations, our study’s strengths significantly bolster the validity of the results and underscore its contributions to AD research. The integration of plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181, and CSF Aβ biomarkers offers a multifaceted perspective on amyloid pathology, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of AD-related changes, and the inclusion of advanced neuroimaging techniques, such as amyloid PET with standardized SUVR/WC metrics and CL scaling across multiple tracers, provides a gold-standard measure of amyloid deposition while ensuring consistency and comparability across analyses. Furthermore, employing dual cognitive assessments (CDR and ADAS) enhances both the reliability of cognitive evaluations and their associations with biomarker levels. These methodological strengths help address the study's inherent limitations and support the conclusion that plasma p-tau217 demonstrates significant potential as a blood-based biomarker for evaluating amyloid deposition in individuals with MCI. In clinical practice, using blood-based biomarkers as a less-invasive and more cost-effective method could significantly impact disease assessment, especially in earlier stages, and streamline the process of patient follow-up. Moreover, the accuracy of plasma p-tau217 in diagnosing and predicting disease progression may complement conventional methods like CSF biomarkers and PET scans, potentially revolutionizing AD diagnostics and patient care. 4.3. Future direction Comparing plasma and CSF biomarkers with other neuroimaging techniques, such as fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography scans (FDG-PET), can provide researchers more practical evidence to determine the accuracy of biomarkers' prediction. Furthermore, combining plasma or CSF biomarkers with neuroimaging data can generate novel and more accurate methods of predicting AD. Besides, conducting longitudinal studies and including more diverse cohorts would enhance understanding of plasma p-tau217’s predictive accuracy and utility in early stage AD diagnosis, future studies should track biomarker changes over timeframes of 3 to 6 years, as these periods have been commonly used in previous longitudinal research on AD biomarkers to monitor disease progression and transitions from preclinical to symptomatic stages ( 40 ). While its high predictive value signifies the potential clinical applications, further validation across various contexts, including disease progression monitoring and treatment response evaluation, should be granted. Furthermore, studies should consider the cost-effectiveness, ease of use, and integration into current diagnostic workflows. 5. Conclusion Our findings indicated that predictive value of the plasma p-tau217 biomarker was stronger than CSF p-tau181 and CSF Aβ42. This suggests that p-tau217 is an accurate and non-invasive biomarker for early-stage AD diagnosis, pending further validation among various populations. Declarations Author contributions statements MHA and MB conceptualized the study. MHA, EZ, FH and NA wrote the original draft. ER did data curation and analyzing. DR, AM, KJ and MFS investigated the database and reviewed previous articles. SF and RZ designed the tables and figure. MB validated the results. MAA supervised the project. MB and MHA revised the manuscript and did editing. 6.1. Acknowledgments Data collection and sharing for this project was funded by the ADNI (National Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904) and DOD ADNI (Department of Defense award number W81XWH-12-2-0012). ADNI is funded by the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, and through generous contributions from the following: AbbVie, Alzheimer’s Association; Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation; Araclon Biotech; BioClinica, Inc.; Biogen; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; CereSpir, Inc.; Cogstate; Eisai Inc.; Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; EuroImmun; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and its affiliated company Genentech, Inc.; Fujirebio; GE Healthcare; IXICO Ltd.; Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development, LLC.; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC.; Lumosity; Lundbeck; Merck & Co., Inc.; Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC.; NeuroRx Research; Neurotrack Technologies; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer Inc.; Piramal Imaging; Servier; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; and Transition Therapeutics. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research is providing funds to support ADNI clinical sites in Canada. Private sector contributions are facilitated by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (www.fnih.org). The grantee organization is the Northern California Institute for Research and Education, and the study is coordinated by the Alzheimer’s Therapeutic Research Institute at the University of Southern California. ADNI data are disseminated by the Laboratory for Neuro Imaging at the University of Southern California. 6.2. Compliance with Ethical Standards The institutional review boards of all participating centers approved the study procedures (https://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uplo ads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf), and all participants or their authorized representatives provided written informed consent. Ethics approval was obtained from the institutional review boards of each institution involved: Oregon Health and Science University; University of Southern California; University of California—San Diego; University of Michigan; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Baylor College of Medicine; Columbia University Medical Center; Washington University, St. Louis; University of Alabama at Birmingham; Mount Sinai School of Medicine; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Johns Hopkins University; New York University; Duke University Medical Center; University of Pennsylvania; University of Kentucky; University of Pittsburgh; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical School; Emory University; University of Kansas, Medical Center; University of California, Los Angeles; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Indiana University; Yale University School of Medicine; McGill University, Montreal-Jewish General Hospital; Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Ontario; U.B.C. Clinic for AD & Related Disorders; and Cognitive Neurology—St. Joseph’s, Ontario; Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health; Northwestern University; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Stanford University; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Boston University; Howard University; Case Western Reserve University; University of California, Davis—Sacramento; Neurological Care of CNY; Parkwood Hospital; University of Wisconsin; University of California, Irvine—BIC; Banner Alzheimer’s Institute; Dent Neurologic Institute; Ohio State University; Albany Medical College; Hartford Hospital, Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Wake Forest University Health Sciences; Rhode Island Hospital; Butler Hospital; UC San Francisco; Medical University South Carolina; St. Joseph’s Health Care Nathan Kline Institute; University of Iowa College of Medicine; and Cornell University and University of South Florida: USF Health Byrd Alzheimer’s Institute. 6.3. Consent for Publication Not applicable. 6.4. Availability of Data and Materials Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (http://adni.loni.usc.edu). The ADNI data are publicly available to qualified investigators upon application and approval. Further details on data access and availability can be found at the ADNI website. The dataset analyzed during this study is not publicly available due to privacy concerns. However, these data can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. 6.5. Competing interest There are no competing interests to declare. 6.6. Funding Not applicable. References Chen GF, Xu TH, Yan Y, Zhou YR, Jiang Y, Melcher K, et al. Amyloid beta: structure, biology and structure-based therapeutic development. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017;38(9):1205-35, doi:10.1038/aps.2017.28. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28713158. Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TL, Fagan AM, Goate A, Fox NC, et al. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(9):795-804, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1202753. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22784036. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Craft S, Fagan AM, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):280-92, doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21514248. Gu L, Guo Z. Alzheimer's Abeta42 and Abeta40 peptides form interlaced amyloid fibrils. J Neurochem. 2013;126(3):305-11, doi:10.1111/jnc.12202. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23406382. Andersen ABA, Lehel S, Grove EK, Langkjaer N, Fuglo D, Huynh THV. Multicenter Experience with Good Manufacturing Practice Production of [(11)C]PiB for Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024;17(2), doi:10.3390/ph17020217. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38399432. D'Amico F, Sofia L, Bauckneht M, Morbelli S. Amyloid PET Imaging: Standard Procedures and Semiquantification. Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2785:165-75, doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-3774-6_11. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38427194. McGrowder DA, Miller F, Vaz K, Nwokocha C, Wilson-Clarke C, Anderson-Cross M, et al. Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Brain Sci. 2021;11(2), doi:10.3390/brainsci11020215. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33578866. Martino-Adami PV, Chatterjee M, Kleineidam L, Weyerer S, Bickel H, Wiese B, et al. Prognostic value of Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarkers in the oldest-old: a prospective primary care-based study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024;45:101030, doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101030. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39253733. Cullen NC, Leuzy A, Janelidze S, Palmqvist S, Svenningsson AL, Stomrud E, et al. Plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease improve prediction of cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired elderly populations. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3555, doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23746-0. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34117234. Arslan B, Zetterberg H, Ashton NJ. Blood-based biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease - moving towards a new era of diagnostics. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2024;62(6):1063-9, doi:10.1515/cclm-2023-1434. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38253262. Dulewicz M, Kulczynska-Przybik A, Mroczko P, Kornhuber J, Lewczuk P, Mroczko B. Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease in Clinical Practice: The Role of CSF Biomarkers during the Evolution of Diagnostic Criteria. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(15), doi:10.3390/ijms23158598. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35955728. Jonaitis EM, Janelidze S, Cody KA, Langhough R, Du L, Chin NA, et al. Plasma phosphorylated tau 217 in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Brain Commun. 2023;5(2):fcad057, doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcad057. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013174. Therriault J, Servaes S, Tissot C, Rahmouni N, Ashton NJ, Benedet AL, et al. Equivalence of plasma p-tau217 with cerebrospinal fluid in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19(11):4967-77, doi:10.1002/alz.13026. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37078495. Ashton NJ, Brum WS, Di Molfetta G, Benedet AL, Arslan B, Jonatis E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the plasma ALZpath pTau217 immunoassay to identify Alzheimer's disease pathology. medRxiv. 2023, doi:10.1101/2023.07.11.23292493. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502842. Petersen RC, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Donohue MC, Gamst AC, Harvey DJ, et al. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): clinical characterization. Neurology. 2010;74(3):201-9, doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181cb3e25. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20042704. Xie Y, Yang Q, Liu C, Zhang Q, Jiang J, Han Y, et al. Exploring the Pattern Associated With Longitudinal Changes of beta-Amyloid Deposition During Cognitively Normal Healthy Aging. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:617173, doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.617173. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33585514. Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43(11):2412-4, doi:10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8232972. Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1982;140:566-72, doi:10.1192/bjp.140.6.566. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7104545. Rc M. The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale; An instrument for assessing treatment efficacy. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1983;19:448-50. Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL. A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1984;141(11):1356-64, doi:10.1176/ajp.141.11.1356. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6496779. Weber CJ, Carrillo MC, Jagust W, Jack CR, Jr., Shaw LM, Trojanowski JQ, et al. The Worldwide Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: ADNI-3 updates and global perspectives. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021;7(1):e12226, doi:10.1002/trc2.12226. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35005206. Palmqvist S, Insel PS, Stomrud E, Janelidze S, Zetterberg H, Brix B, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarker trajectories with increasing amyloid deposition in Alzheimer's disease. EMBO Mol Med. 2019;11(12):e11170, doi:10.15252/emmm.201911170. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31709776. Vlassenko AG, McCue L, Jasielec MS, Su Y, Gordon BA, Xiong C, et al. Imaging and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in early preclinical alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2016;80(3):379-87, doi:10.1002/ana.24719. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27398953. Palmqvist S, Mattsson N, Hansson O, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging I. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis detects cerebral amyloid-beta accumulation earlier than positron emission tomography. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 4):1226-36, doi:10.1093/brain/aww015. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26936941. Nasiri H, Azaraein MH, Shakeri S, Sadeghi M, Sohrabi-Ashlaghi A, Berenjian S, et al. The polygenic hazard score mediates the association between plasma neurofilament light chain and brain morphometry in dementia spectrum. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2025;130:105703, doi:10.1016/j.archger.2024.105703. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39631103. Hansson O, Lehmann S, Otto M, Zetterberg H, Lewczuk P. Advantages and disadvantages of the use of the CSF Amyloid beta (Abeta) 42/40 ratio in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019;11(1):34, doi:10.1186/s13195-019-0485-0. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31010420. Skillback T, Farahmand BY, Rosen C, Mattsson N, Nagga K, Kilander L, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid tau and amyloid-beta1-42 in patients with dementia. Brain. 2015;138(Pt 9):2716-31, doi:10.1093/brain/awv181. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26133663. Barthelemy NR, Li Y, Joseph-Mathurin N, Gordon BA, Hassenstab J, Benzinger TLS, et al. A soluble phosphorylated tau signature links tau, amyloid and the evolution of stages of dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease. Nat Med. 2020;26(3):398-407, doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0781-z. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32161412. Lai R, Li B, Bishnoi R. P-tau217 as a Reliable Blood-Based Marker of Alzheimer's Disease. Biomedicines. 2024;12(8), doi:10.3390/biomedicines12081836. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39200300. Mattsson-Carlgren N, Salvado G, Ashton NJ, Tideman P, Stomrud E, Zetterberg H, et al. Prediction of Longitudinal Cognitive Decline in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease Using Plasma Biomarkers. JAMA Neurol. 2023;80(4):360-9, doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.5272. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745413. Mielke MM, Dage JL, Frank RD, Algeciras-Schimnich A, Knopman DS, Lowe VJ, et al. Performance of plasma phosphorylated tau 181 and 217 in the community. Nat Med. 2022;28(7):1398-405, doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01822-2. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35618838. Schoonenboom NS, Reesink FE, Verwey NA, Kester MI, Teunissen CE, van de Ven PM, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid markers for differential dementia diagnosis in a large memory clinic cohort. Neurology. 2012;78(1):47-54, doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823ed0f0. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22170879. Brum WS, Cullen NC, Janelidze S, Ashton NJ, Zimmer ER, Therriault J, et al. A two-step workflow based on plasma p-tau217 to screen for amyloid beta positivity with further confirmatory testing only in uncertain cases. Nat Aging. 2023;3(9):1079-90, doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00471-5. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653254. Struyfs H, Niemantsverdriet E, Goossens J, Fransen E, Martin JJ, De Deyn PP, et al. Cerebrospinal Fluid P-Tau181P: Biomarker for Improved Differential Dementia Diagnosis. Front Neurol. 2015;6:138, doi:10.3389/fneur.2015.00138. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26136723. Ewers M, Mattsson N, Minthon L, Molinuevo JL, Antonell A, Popp J, et al. CSF biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: A large-scale international multicenter study. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(11):1306-15, doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.12.006. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25804998. Groot C, Cicognola C, Bali D, Triana-Baltzer G, Dage JL, Pontecorvo MJ, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic performance to detect Alzheimer's disease and clinical progression of a novel assay for plasma p-tau217. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022;14(1):67, doi:10.1186/s13195-022-01005-8. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35568889. Janelidze S, Bali D, Ashton NJ, Barthelemy NR, Vanbrabant J, Stoops E, et al. Head-to-head comparison of 10 plasma phospho-tau assays in prodromal Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2023;146(4):1592-601, doi:10.1093/brain/awac333. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36087307. Chen L, Niu X, Wang Y, Lv S, Zhou X, Yang Z, et al. Plasma tau proteins for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:942629, doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.942629. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959295. Qu Y, Ma YH, Huang YY, Ou YN, Shen XN, Chen SD, et al. Blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;128:479-86, doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.07.007. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34245759. Mattsson-Carlgren N, Janelidze S, Palmqvist S, Cullen N, Svenningsson AL, Strandberg O, et al. Longitudinal plasma p-tau217 is increased in early stages of Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2020;143(11):3234-41, doi:10.1093/brain/awaa286. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33068398. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files Supplementaryfile.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7327653","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":518864241,"identity":"5f7405d4-7fbb-406f-8803-8ad2735585d2","order_by":0,"name":"Mohammad Hossein Azaraein","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mohammad","middleName":"Hossein","lastName":"Azaraein","suffix":""},{"id":518864242,"identity":"52c55507-b32f-47d1-a580-0184db2ecd2d","order_by":1,"name":"Elham Zarrazvand","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Tehran University of Medical Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Elham","middleName":"","lastName":"Zarrazvand","suffix":""},{"id":518864243,"identity":"4e193ed9-bfd3-4300-81de-3f1f8dedb95f","order_by":2,"name":"Fatemeh Heydari","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Qom Islamic Azad University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Fatemeh","middleName":"","lastName":"Heydari","suffix":""},{"id":518864244,"identity":"ededce92-6869-4386-a125-7d2618290bed","order_by":3,"name":"Nasim Asimi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Islamic Azad University, Tehran","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nasim","middleName":"","lastName":"Asimi","suffix":""},{"id":518864245,"identity":"49ca9711-95c3-4561-9cb5-10535c9e09b6","order_by":4,"name":"Elham Ramezannezhad","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Isfahan University of Medical Science","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Elham","middleName":"","lastName":"Ramezannezhad","suffix":""},{"id":518864246,"identity":"7db39838-5f56-45a0-a498-d044ca456f4e","order_by":5,"name":"Deniz Rahimipour","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Iran University of Medical Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Deniz","middleName":"","lastName":"Rahimipour","suffix":""},{"id":518864247,"identity":"9dda8345-81a6-495f-b91c-ecac7f157aaf","order_by":6,"name":"Kimia Janeshin","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kimia","middleName":"","lastName":"Janeshin","suffix":""},{"id":518864248,"identity":"8895f408-48ff-49b9-acc4-e0f256896bc2","order_by":7,"name":"Aida Mahdian","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Kashan University of Medical Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Aida","middleName":"","lastName":"Mahdian","suffix":""},{"id":518864249,"identity":"cf2e3382-87c0-48f5-a378-1e66df4b583d","order_by":8,"name":"Maryam Fallahpour Sichani","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Islamic Azad University, Tehran","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Maryam","middleName":"Fallahpour","lastName":"Sichani","suffix":""},{"id":518864250,"identity":"5d34b9f2-9cd8-4d42-8a20-d6a038cdce14","order_by":9,"name":"Shaghayegh Farhadi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Islamic Azad University Sanandaj Branch","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shaghayegh","middleName":"","lastName":"Farhadi","suffix":""},{"id":518864251,"identity":"5c865fbc-09cb-4eaa-9669-c1638c26a3a0","order_by":10,"name":"Razieh Zamiri","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Padua","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Razieh","middleName":"","lastName":"Zamiri","suffix":""},{"id":518864252,"identity":"e97dc059-518d-40b9-b17e-1ca58cf0f6ac","order_by":11,"name":"Mohammad Amir Amirian","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Kashan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mohammad","middleName":"Amir","lastName":"Amirian","suffix":""},{"id":518864253,"identity":"940f539a-043e-47a5-bd89-90818f49c504","order_by":12,"name":"Maryam Bemanalizadeh","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"NeuroTRACT Association, Tehran University of Medical Sciences","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Maryam","middleName":"","lastName":"Bemanalizadeh","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-08-08 13:23:23","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7327653/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7327653/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":92257590,"identity":"63bd9c20-5319-4b18-80c2-13faff1d17ab","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-26 11:53:30","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":208778,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ManuscriptRevised.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7327653/v1/17c5dfcaaab208be14252502.docx"},{"id":92257213,"identity":"10788b46-910e-4d3b-b314-424ca06a3f4f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-26 11:45:29","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":14579,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"f0a4539ebce04668904afbae37f1ae6b.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7327653/v1/98269848539aee3d4ea6b071.json"},{"id":92257587,"identity":"fa81cf1e-6306-4a48-b3b8-0cffbe3c4548","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-26 11:53:30","extension":"docx","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":15446,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Supplementaryfile.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7327653/v1/d03421c7a8e8bf99787c3a80.docx"},{"id":92257212,"identity":"bef67e6e-b6cd-40c9-8210-b1ac557a8a15","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-26 11:45:29","extension":"xml","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":106294,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"f0a4539ebce04668904afbae37f1ae6b1enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7327653/v1/937cb0c19b979e7dac7aa868.xml"},{"id":92257584,"identity":"a15fae0a-0a7b-4d35-8c4b-5f4a268e47f1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-26 11:53:29","extension":"jpeg","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":78080,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7327653/v1/fe16b10240b51cd73384aae0.jpeg"},{"id":92257210,"identity":"b3f72a29-5664-42f1-afb2-c5231bcdb0ba","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-26 11:45:29","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":34884,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7327653/v1/88b74ec56651d37d5f4cbf8d.png"},{"id":92257217,"identity":"174d838d-1b74-432f-8213-02b6dec45272","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-26 11:45:30","extension":"xml","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":102583,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"f0a4539ebce04668904afbae37f1ae6b1structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7327653/v1/f16d9c1b5b6a45c23ab689f8.xml"},{"id":92257216,"identity":"2ee921fe-d1b5-468d-96d1-687050cee1b7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-26 11:45:30","extension":"html","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":117468,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7327653/v1/f094b372ef51fbdac8ce0b3c.html"},{"id":92257207,"identity":"51f5a16c-ee3f-437f-b88e-ac060b2c7953","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-26 11:45:29","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":83066,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eScatter plot illustrating the correlations between biomarkers (plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181, and CSF Aβ42) and SUVR/WC scores, derived from multiple linear regression analyses.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7327653/v1/a1197864822df70b014b9f27.png"},{"id":93563052,"identity":"3cdc84b1-0de0-4cab-a329-598e38ef044e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-15 08:02:18","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":989396,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7327653/v1/eee9d471-2f0a-4d41-b3be-1365597e1d84.pdf"},{"id":92257208,"identity":"610b3c40-94c2-4f24-8554-ad1a4ab670a9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-26 11:45:29","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":15446,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Supplementaryfile.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7327653/v1/7de5d75cbf244e08cdd0909e.docx"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Comparing the predictive value of plasma p-tau217 and CSF biomarkers (p-tau181, Aβ42) using amyloid positron emission tomography in Alzheimer's continuum","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eAlzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent form of dementia, affecting approximately 50\u0026nbsp;million people worldwide, and this number is expected to triple by 2050, exacerbating the risks of disability, disease burden, and healthcare expenditure (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). AD is characterized by the abnormal accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides and hyperphosphorylation of tau. Aβ deposition, occurring decades before the onset of clinical symptoms of AD, represents the earliest detectable pathological hallmark (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe Aβ hypothesis posits that the accumulation of Aβ peptides, primarily Aβ40 and Aβ42, is the principal factor in AD pathogenesis. The deposition of Aβ peptides occurs mainly in the hippocampus, neocortex, and cerebrovascular regions, correlating with the distribution of senile plaques (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is an advanced non-invasive diagnostic method for AD is a utilizes radiopharmaceutical method performs by using several radiotracers such as 11C-Pittsburgh compound B and 18F-labeled compounds that selectively bind to Aβ plaques, evaluating Aβ plaque deposition in the brain's grey matter, which is one of the earliest detectable changes in AD diagnosis (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRecent advances in AD diagnosis have introduced biomarkers capable of identifying AD pathologies, similarly to how accurate Aβ and tau burdens are detected via PET or CSF analysis. It has been proven that biomarkers derived from plasma, urine, or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are pivotal in disease diagnosis, prognosis, and contribute significantly to the advancement of new drug therapies (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e). For instance, CSF biomarkers such as total tau (t-tau), phosphorylated tau (p-tau), and the 42-amino acid isoform of Aβ (Aβ1\u0026ndash;42) are favorable, as elevated t-tau, p-tau181, p-tau217 levels and reduced Aβ1\u0026ndash;42 are observed in many diagnosed patients (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e). Blood-based biomarkers provide less invasive and more affordable options compared to neuroimaging and CSF biomarkers, while due to the invasiveness of lumbar punctures, considerable costs, and the specialized facilities required for PET imaging, these approaches are restricted and lead to major worries for patients and limited accessibility (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e). It is noteworthy to mention that blood biomarkers are increasingly valuable for trial recruitment, diagnosis, and disease monitoring, potentially reducing the need for confirmatory CSF or PET scans (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMoreover, because of minimal fold-change between amyloid PET-positive and -negative in patients, the reliability of the plasma Aβ42/40 ratio is inadequate for clinical investigations. In contrast, p-tau blood tests show a significant increase of 100\u0026ndash;400% in AD patients, aligning with extracellular Aβ plaque pathology, which can be used as a defining hallmark of AD. This makes the p-tau one of the best contenders among novel AD blood tests, offering superior diagnostic accuracy and disease specificity to other known blood biomarkers. Therefore, p-tau, especially p-tau217, is recognized as the primary blood biomarker for AD pathology across all disease stages and exhibits high performance in distinguishing AD from other neurodegenerative diseases and detecting AD pathology in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR13\" citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis study aims to validate plasma p-tau217, specifically its accuracy as a predictive biomarker for Aβ burden in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease. We hypothesize that plasma p-tau217 outperforms classic CSF biomarkers in predicting cerebral amyloid levels. Utilizing the Alzheimer\u0026rsquo;s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis comparing CSF biomarkers (p-tau181, Aβ42) with p-tau217 in predicting Aβ deposition in the brain.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Method","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.1. Participants\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe data employed in this study were obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, which is available at (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://adni.loni.usc.edu\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://adni.loni.usc.edu\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003e).\u003c/span\u003e Launched in 2003, ADNI runs as a partnership between the public and private sectors under the guidance of Principal Investigator Michael W. Weiner, MD. The primary objective of ADNI has been to assess the PET and additional biological biomarkers alongside neuropsychological assessments to monitor the progression of MCI and early AD. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for ADNI participants are comprehensively detailed in other publications (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e). In summary, eligible individuals, aged 55 to 90, underwent various assessments, including neuroimaging, lumbar punctures, and longitudinal follow-ups. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFor this investigation, we included participants classified as EMCI (early mild cognitive impairment) and LMCI (late mild cognitive impairment) from the ADNI cohort. We had access to all demographic information (such as gender, age, and education), CSF biomarkers (P-tau181 and Aβ42), plasma biomarker (p-tau217), and neuropsychological assessments, including the Alzheimer\u0026rsquo;s Disease Assessment Scale 11 (ADAS-11) and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Additionally, we collected data from individuals who had undergone comprehensive amyloid PET data using [18F] florbetapir (FBP) smoothed to a uniform resolution of 6 mm. All datasets used for this study and the corresponding access dates are listed in Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e. The study ultimately included a total of 30 participants, with 14 classified as EMCI and 16 as LMCI subjects.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.2. Cognitive Assessments\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eOur study utilized two assessment methods, CDR (Clinical Dementia Rating) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e) and ADAS-11 (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e), to evaluate the extent of cognitive and non-cognitive dysfunction in individuals exhibiting signs of the dementia spectrum. CDR is a scale that can determine the degree of dysfunction in six domains of cognitive and non-cognitive performance associated with dementia spectrum disorders, such as AD. These domains are memory, orientation, problem-solving, home and hobbies, community affairs, and personal care. Each domain is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates no impairment and 3 indicates severe impairment in the assessed function. The only exception is personal care, which is assessed on a 4-point scale without a 0.5 rating. The ratings are derived from a semi-structured interview conducted by a professional with the patient and reliable informants. The ADAS-11 consists of two parts: cognitive and non-cognitive testing. It was originally designed to measure the severity of cognitive and non-cognitive dysfunction in individuals with AD. The cognitive subscale, known as ADAS-Cog, is more commonly used and apart from assessing memory, praxis, language, and orientation, it encompasses specific tasks such as word recall and recognition, object and finger naming, and following commands. The assessment typically requires up to 45 minutes to complete, and the total score ranges from 0 to 70, with a higher score indicating greater cognitive impairment.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.3. Plasma p-tau217 and CSF Biomarkers Measurements\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003ePlasma p-tau217 was quantified in samples from the ADNI2/3 cohort using a standardized protocol developed with Janssen R\u0026amp;D. Measurements were performed on the Simoa HD-X platform with a three-step assay targeting p-tau217 and total tau, employing pT3 and hT43 antibodies specific to amino acids 210\u0026ndash;220. The assay was calibrated with synthetic peptides (0.002\u0026ndash;10 pg/mL) and used K2-EDTA plasma at a 1:2 dilution (linear up to 1:16). Validation confirmed high sensitivity, accuracy, and precision (intra-assay CV: 5.06\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.09%; inter-assay CV: 4.16\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.78%), along with sample stability across multiple conditions (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCSF biomarkers\u0026mdash;Aβ42 and p-tau181\u0026mdash;were measured to assess brain amyloid and tau pathology. Reduced Aβ levels indicate amyloid plaque accumulation, a hallmark of AD, while elevated p-tau181 reflect neurofibrillary tangles and neurodegeneration, respectively. Concentrations were determined using the INNO-BIA AlzBio3 assay (Fujirebio Europe), a Research Use Only (RUO) multiplex immunoassay on the Luminex platform, enabling simultaneous and precise quantification. The assay\u0026rsquo;s performance was validated with non-ADNI CSF samples, showing reliable within-laboratory precision but variable inter-laboratory reproducibility with ADNI1 CSF. A linear regression-based rescaling method was applied to mitigate kit-to-kit variability, using fresh ADNI baseline CSF aliquots to align subsequent batch results with original values, ensuring consistency and reproducibility (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.4. Amyloid PET Measurements\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAmyloid PET data were obtained using the Laboratory of Neuro Imaging (LONI) pipeline, incorporating tracers such as [18F] florbetapir (FBP). Amyloid burden was assessed in the cortical summary region, normalized by the whole cerebellum reference region. PET images were co-registered to compute regional Standardized Uptake Value Ratios (SUVRs). Amyloid positivity or negativity was determined using composite reference thresholds of 0.78 SUVR for FBP and 0.74 SUVR for FBB in 6-mm datasets\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.6. Statistical Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eData were matched based on exam dates, visit codes, and variable values (e.g., plasma p-tau217, Aβ PET, CDR). Outliers were removed, and data were standardized using z-score normalization prior to analysis. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted using Python (with pandas, NumPy, Matplotlib, and Seaborn packages). Six models were developed to assess the predictive value of plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181, and CSF Aβ42 for Aβ PET scores (SUVR/WC), with age, gender, and cognitive scores (CDR or ADAS) included as covariates. Each model evaluated one biomarker as the primary predictor, adjusting for the specified covariates, and results were compared across models to determine relative predictive performance.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3. Result","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e3.1. Data pre-processing\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eA cross-sectional study was conducted to identify individuals with complete records of plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181, CSF Aβ42, and summary SUVR normalized with the whole cerebellum (WC) by considering CDR and ADAS as cognitive scores. Among all the participants, thirty contributors met our necessary inclusion criteria for the study. Due to the clinical significance of degeneration changes, Evaluations were conducted at either 48 or 60 months, with the majority of patients visited at 48 months from 2016 to 2017.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e3.2. Demographic characteristics of participants\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe investigated patients containing 63% males and 37% females, diagnosed with either EMCI (47%) or LMCI (53%), with a mean age of 72\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.4 years. Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e presents a summary of participants' demographic data comprising CDR and ADAS scores, plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181, and CSF Aβ42 levels.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDemographics and clinical features\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eVariables\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD/frequency\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"1\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAge (years)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e72\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.4\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"1\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eGender (Female, Male,%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e37%, 63%\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"1\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eEMCI, LMCI (%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e47%, 53%\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"1\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCDR\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.59\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.2\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"1\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eADAS-11\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e9.34\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.8\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"1\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eplasma p-tau217\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.076\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.05\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"1\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCSF Aβ42\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1113.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;649\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"1\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCSF p-tau181\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e33.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;17.6\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"1\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSUVR/WC\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.23\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"1\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAbbreviations: EMCI: early mild cognitive impairment; LMCI: Late Mild Cognitive Impairment; CDR: The Clinical Dementia Rating; ADAS: The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale\u0026ndash;Cognitive Subscale; p-tau: phosphorylated tau; SUVR: Standardized Uptake Value Ratios; WC: whole cerebellum.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"1\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e3.3. CDR-adjusted Models\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAfter adjusting for age, gender and CDR, multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the predictive value of biomarkers, considering SUVR/WC as the dependent criterion (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). Our analysis demonstrated that our three biomarkers, including plasma p-tau217 (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001, Adj-R\u0026sup2;=0.51), CSF p-tau181 (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001, Adj-R\u0026sup2;=0.43), and CSF Aβ42 (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001, Adj-R\u0026sup2; =0.42), were significantly predictive for Aβ burden in the cognitively impaired Individuals.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMultiple Linear Regression Analysis using CDR\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePredictor variables\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCoeff\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSE\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eP-value\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAdj-R\u0026sup2;\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"5\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eModel 1\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePlasma p-tau217\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.81\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.20\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\" morerows=\"4\" rowspan=\"5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.51\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAge\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.09\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.14\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.51\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eGender\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e-0.19\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.28\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.49\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCDR\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e-0.05\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.08\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.51\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eIntercept\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.19\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.24\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.45\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"5\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eModel 2\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCSF p-tau181\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.03\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.01\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\" morerows=\"4\" rowspan=\"5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.42\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAge\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.13\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.15\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.37\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eGender\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e-0.48\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.31\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.14\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCDR\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.12\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.06\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.05\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eIntercept\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e-1.00\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.31\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.00\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"5\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eModel 3\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCSF Aβ42\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e-0.50\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.15\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\" morerows=\"4\" rowspan=\"5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.43\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAge\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.14\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.15\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.35\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eGender\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e-0.01\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.31\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.98\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCDR\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.12\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.06\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.05\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eIntercept\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e-0.27\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.23\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.25\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"5\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAbbreviation: Coeff; Coefficient, SE; Standard error, Adj-R\u0026sup2;; Adjusted R-squared, CSF; Cerebrospinal fluid, CDR; Clinical Dementia Rating.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e3.4. ADAS-adjusted Models\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn the following, by adjusting for age, gender and ADAS, multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess the prediction rate of biomarkers' effects on Aβ-pet scan score (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). Our analyses showed that collected biomarkers were significantly predictive of Aβ deposition in the brain tissue [plasma p-tau217 (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001, Adj-R\u0026sup2;=0.53), CSF Aβ42 (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001, Adj-R\u0026sup2;=0.32), and CSF p-tau181 (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001, Adj-R\u0026sup2;=0.37)].\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMultiple Linear Regression Analysis using ADAS\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePredictor variables\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCoeff\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSE\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eP-value\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAdj-R\u0026sup2;\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"5\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eModel 4\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePlasma p-tau217\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.82\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.16\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\" morerows=\"4\" rowspan=\"5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.53\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAge\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.07\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.13\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.61\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eGender\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e-0.23\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.28\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.42\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eADAS\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e-0.19\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.16\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.25\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eIntercept\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.08\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.16\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.61\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"5\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eModel 5\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCSF p-tau181\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.03\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.01\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\" morerows=\"4\" rowspan=\"5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.32\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAge\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.17\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.16\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.30\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eGender\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e-0.60\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.35\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.09\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eADAS\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.03\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.18\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.87\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eIntercept\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e-0.84\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.35\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.02\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"5\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eModel 6\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCSF Aβ42\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e-0.56\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.16\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\" morerows=\"4\" rowspan=\"5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.37\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAge\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.18\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.15\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.26\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eGender\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.01\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.33\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.98\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eADAS\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.20\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.15\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.20\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eIntercept\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e-0.00\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.19\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.99\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"5\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAbbreviation: Coeff; Coefficient, SE; Standard error, Adj-R\u0026sup2;; Adjusted R-squared, CSF; Cerebrospinal fluid, ADAS; Alzheimer\u0026rsquo;s Disease Assessment Scale.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e3.5. Predictive Accuracy of Plasma Tau217, CSF P-tau181 and CSF Aβ42 Biomarkers\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eBy performing multiple linear regression analyses, after adjusting for demographic features, we tested the predictive ability of plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181, and CSF Aβ42 for assessing the accumulation of Aβ plaques using Aβ PET (SUVR/WC score). As we found, collected biomarkers had a remarkable relation with the Aβ deposition, showing significant predictive value. According to the analyses, plasma p-tau217 with a higher level of determination was the most powerful predictor in these analyses (Adj-R\u0026sup2;=0.53 for ADAS and Adj-R\u0026sup2;=0.51 for CDR).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAs the figure shows, after adjusting for demographic features and cognition scores, Aβ deposition in the brain is meaningfully associated with the biomarkers. It indicates that an increase in plasma p-tau217 and CSF p-tau181 is correlated with enhancing the rate of Aβ burden in the brain tissue and CSF Aβ42 has an inverse concomitant with Aβ deposition.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4. Discussion","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e4.1. Interpretation\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis study evaluated the predictive accuracy of three biomarkers, including plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181, and CSF Aβ42 and brain Aβ deposition measured by SUVR/WC in individuals with EMCI and LMCI. We evaluated each biomarker\u0026rsquo;s value in indicating brain Aβ pathology and their respective roles in diagnosing and the progression of AD. Our findings demonstrated a strong positive correlation between each of the biomarkers (plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181 and CSF Aβ42) and brain Aβ burden (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001), highlighting their predictive value in Aβ pathology. Meanwhile, plasma p-tau217 emerged as the strongest predictor of brain Aβ deposition, showing the highest Adj-R\u0026sup2; value after being adjusted for confounders, including age, gender, and cognitive scores (ADAS and CDR). These findings underscore plasma p-tau217's potential as a reliable indicator of AD pathology in the early stages, as supported by multiple regression models.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAs many studies have implied that CSF Aβ42 decreases during the development of AD, even preceding cognitive symptoms or Aβ-PET changes, its efficiency has been challenged by the research, demonstrating higher specificity for other biomarkers, such as tau proteins and neurofilament light chains in differentiating AD from other dementias (\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR23 CR24\" citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e). Moreover, CSF Aβ reduction can also occur in various neurodegenerative disorders, limiting its diagnostic precision, such as frontotemporal dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, vascular dementia, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and also it may also appear in individuals who never progress to AD clinical symptoms (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e). The adversity of CSF Aβ as a specific AD biomarker has led to increased interest in p-tau markers. Tau staging shows site-specific phosphorylation changes correlating with disease progression, structural, metabolic, neurodegenerative, and clinical disease indicators. The accumulation of p-tau217 and p-tau181 may begin concurrently with early Aβ aggregation, up to two decades before tau pathology becomes apparent (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eLai et al (2024) proved that plasma p-tau217 and p-tau181 have a great association with amyloid-PET status that can predict amyloid positivity. Besides, plasma epitopes of p-tau, such as 217 and 181, indicated a great relationship with their CSF levels, specifically for p-tau217. Due to the specificity and reliability of p-tau217 compared to other p-tau species found in previous studies, it can be used as the most suggestive predictor for diagnosis and progression analysis of AD (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e), especially when plasma p-tau217 has the ability to predict long-term cognitive impairment in preclinical AD (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eGiven these findings, plasma p-tau217 emerges as a clinically relevant biomarker. Unlike CSF biomarkers that require invasive lumbar punctures with associated risks such as infection and bleeding, or PET imaging, which are often impractical for routine use in primary care settings, plasma p-tau217 can be measured through a simple blood draw and lead to a reduction in the necessity for confirmatory testing. This minimally invasive approach significantly reduces patient discomfort while enabling more frequent and accessible monitoring of individuals at risk for AD (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn the present study, the predictive value of CSF-Aβ42 and CSF p-tau181 were remarkable, as it was in line with previous studies (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e). Furthermore, we found that plasma p-tau217 biomarker exhibited greater results than CSF p-tau181 and CSF Aβ42 biomarkers, considering their significancy and higher Adj-R\u0026sup2; values for plasma p-tau217, which means plasma p-tau217 had stronger accuracy levels to be a stronger predictor of cognitive impairments and Aβ-PET positivity in the AD continuum. Our results were consistent with previous studies demonstrated that plasma p-tau217 accurately predicts abnormal Aβ status as well as CSF biomarkers in detecting Aβ burden in the brain and the upcoming onset of AD dementia in individuals with MCI (\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR37\" citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e). Likewise, in a meta-analysis, Qu et al (2021) confirmed the higher specificity of plasma p-tau217 in the diagnosis of AD compared to p-tau181 and p-tau231. It shows that plasma p-tau217 provided a superior indicator for AD detection and had better discriminative accuracy for MCI than p-tau181 and p-tau231 (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e4.2. \u003cem\u003eLimitations and strengths\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eA relatively small sample size in our study may somewhat interfere with the generalizability of the results to a broader MCI population, particularly those outside the ADNI cohort. The cross-sectional design limits the ability to observe temporal changes in biomarker levels and disease progression over time, which would provide valuable insights into longitudinal dynamics. Additionally, our focus on MCI participants from the ADNI database may not capture the entire spectrum of cognitive decline associated with AD.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDespite these limitations, our study\u0026rsquo;s strengths significantly bolster the validity of the results and underscore its contributions to AD research. The integration of plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181, and CSF Aβ biomarkers offers a multifaceted perspective on amyloid pathology, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of AD-related changes, and the inclusion of advanced neuroimaging techniques, such as amyloid PET with standardized SUVR/WC metrics and CL scaling across multiple tracers, provides a gold-standard measure of amyloid deposition while ensuring consistency and comparability across analyses. Furthermore, employing dual cognitive assessments (CDR and ADAS) enhances both the reliability of cognitive evaluations and their associations with biomarker levels. These methodological strengths help address the study's inherent limitations and support the conclusion that plasma p-tau217 demonstrates significant potential as a blood-based biomarker for evaluating amyloid deposition in individuals with MCI. In clinical practice, using blood-based biomarkers as a less-invasive and more cost-effective method could significantly impact disease assessment, especially in earlier stages, and streamline the process of patient follow-up. Moreover, the accuracy of plasma p-tau217 in diagnosing and predicting disease progression may complement conventional methods like CSF biomarkers and PET scans, potentially revolutionizing AD diagnostics and patient care.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e4.3. \u003cem\u003eFuture direction\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eComparing plasma and CSF biomarkers with other neuroimaging techniques, such as fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography scans (FDG-PET), can provide researchers more practical evidence to determine the accuracy of biomarkers' prediction. Furthermore, combining plasma or CSF biomarkers with neuroimaging data can generate novel and more accurate methods of predicting AD.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBesides, conducting longitudinal studies and including more diverse cohorts would enhance understanding of plasma p-tau217\u0026rsquo;s predictive accuracy and utility in early stage AD diagnosis, future studies should track biomarker changes over timeframes of 3 to 6 years, as these periods have been commonly used in previous longitudinal research on AD biomarkers to monitor disease progression and transitions from preclinical to symptomatic stages (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e). While its high predictive value signifies the potential clinical applications, further validation across various contexts, including disease progression monitoring and treatment response evaluation, should be granted. Furthermore, studies should consider the cost-effectiveness, ease of use, and integration into current diagnostic workflows.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"5. Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eOur findings indicated that predictive value of the plasma p-tau217 biomarker was stronger than CSF p-tau181 and CSF Aβ42. This suggests that p-tau217 is an accurate and non-invasive biomarker for early-stage AD diagnosis, pending further validation among various populations.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor contributions statements\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMHA and MB conceptualized the study. MHA, EZ, FH and NA wrote the original draft. ER did data curation and analyzing. DR, AM, KJ and MFS investigated the database and reviewed previous articles. SF and RZ designed the tables and figure. MB validated the results. MAA supervised the project. MB and MHA revised the manuscript and did editing.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e6.1. Acknowledgments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eData collection and sharing for this project was funded by the ADNI (National Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904) and DOD ADNI (Department of Defense award number W81XWH-12-2-0012). ADNI is funded by the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, and through generous contributions from the following: AbbVie, Alzheimer\u0026rsquo;s Association; Alzheimer\u0026rsquo;s Drug Discovery Foundation; Araclon Biotech; BioClinica, Inc.; Biogen; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; CereSpir, Inc.; Cogstate; Eisai Inc.; Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; EuroImmun; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and its affiliated company Genentech, Inc.; Fujirebio; GE Healthcare; IXICO Ltd.; Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research \u0026amp; Development, LLC.; Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson Pharmaceutical Research \u0026amp; Development LLC.; Lumosity; Lundbeck; Merck \u0026amp; Co., Inc.; Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC.; NeuroRx Research; Neurotrack Technologies; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer Inc.; Piramal Imaging; Servier; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; and Transition Therapeutics. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research is providing funds to support ADNI clinical sites in Canada. Private sector contributions are facilitated by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (www.fnih.org). The grantee organization is the Northern California Institute for Research and Education, and the study is coordinated by the Alzheimer\u0026rsquo;s Therapeutic Research Institute at the University of Southern California. ADNI data are disseminated by the Laboratory for Neuro Imaging at the University of Southern California.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e6.2. Compliance with Ethical Standards\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe institutional review boards of all participating centers approved the study procedures (https://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uplo ads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf), and all participants or their authorized representatives provided written informed consent. Ethics approval was obtained from the institutional review boards of each institution involved: Oregon Health and Science University; University of Southern California; University of California\u0026mdash;San Diego; University of Michigan; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Baylor College of Medicine; Columbia University Medical Center; Washington University, St. Louis; University of Alabama at Birmingham; Mount Sinai School of Medicine; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Johns Hopkins University; New York University; Duke University Medical Center; University of Pennsylvania; University of Kentucky; University of Pittsburgh; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical School; Emory University; University of Kansas, Medical Center; University of California, Los Angeles; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Indiana University; Yale University School of Medicine; McGill University, Montreal-Jewish General Hospital; Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Ontario; U.B.C. Clinic for AD \u0026amp; Related Disorders; and Cognitive Neurology\u0026mdash;St. Joseph\u0026rsquo;s, Ontario; Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health; Northwestern University; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women\u0026rsquo;s Hospital; Stanford University; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Boston University; Howard University; Case Western Reserve University; University of California, Davis\u0026mdash;Sacramento; Neurological Care of CNY; Parkwood Hospital; University of Wisconsin; University of California, Irvine\u0026mdash;BIC; Banner Alzheimer\u0026rsquo;s Institute; Dent Neurologic Institute; Ohio State University; Albany Medical College; Hartford Hospital, Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Wake Forest University Health Sciences; Rhode Island Hospital; Butler Hospital; UC San Francisco; Medical University South Carolina; St. Joseph\u0026rsquo;s Health Care Nathan Kline Institute; University of Iowa College of Medicine; and Cornell University and University of South Florida: USF Health Byrd Alzheimer\u0026rsquo;s Institute.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e6.3. Consent for Publication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e6.4. Availability of Data and Materials\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eData used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer\u0026rsquo;s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (http://adni.loni.usc.edu). The ADNI data are publicly available to qualified investigators upon application and approval. Further details on data access and availability can be found at the ADNI website. The dataset analyzed during this study is not publicly available due to privacy concerns. However, these data can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e6.5. Competing interest\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThere are no competing interests to declare.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e6.6. Funding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eChen GF, Xu TH, Yan Y, Zhou YR, Jiang Y, Melcher K, et al. Amyloid beta: structure, biology and structure-based therapeutic development. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017;38(9):1205-35, doi:10.1038/aps.2017.28. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28713158.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TL, Fagan AM, Goate A, Fox NC, et al. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(9):795-804, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1202753. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22784036.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Craft S, Fagan AM, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer\u0026apos;s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):280-92, doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21514248.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGu L, Guo Z. Alzheimer\u0026apos;s Abeta42 and Abeta40 peptides form interlaced amyloid fibrils. J Neurochem. 2013;126(3):305-11, doi:10.1111/jnc.12202. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23406382.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAndersen ABA, Lehel S, Grove EK, Langkjaer N, Fuglo D, Huynh THV. Multicenter Experience with Good Manufacturing Practice Production of [(11)C]PiB for Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024;17(2), doi:10.3390/ph17020217. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38399432.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eD\u0026apos;Amico F, Sofia L, Bauckneht M, Morbelli S. Amyloid PET Imaging: Standard Procedures and Semiquantification. Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2785:165-75, doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-3774-6_11. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38427194.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMcGrowder DA, Miller F, Vaz K, Nwokocha C, Wilson-Clarke C, Anderson-Cross M, et al. Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers of Alzheimer\u0026apos;s Disease: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Brain Sci. 2021;11(2), doi:10.3390/brainsci11020215. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33578866.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMartino-Adami PV, Chatterjee M, Kleineidam L, Weyerer S, Bickel H, Wiese B, et al. Prognostic value of Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease plasma biomarkers in the oldest-old: a prospective primary care-based study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024;45:101030, doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101030. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39253733.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCullen NC, Leuzy A, Janelidze S, Palmqvist S, Svenningsson AL, Stomrud E, et al. Plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease improve prediction of cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired elderly populations. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3555, doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23746-0. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34117234.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eArslan B, Zetterberg H, Ashton NJ. Blood-based biomarkers in Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease - moving towards a new era of diagnostics. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2024;62(6):1063-9, doi:10.1515/cclm-2023-1434. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38253262.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDulewicz M, Kulczynska-Przybik A, Mroczko P, Kornhuber J, Lewczuk P, Mroczko B. Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer\u0026apos;s Disease in Clinical Practice: The Role of CSF Biomarkers during the Evolution of Diagnostic Criteria. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(15), doi:10.3390/ijms23158598. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35955728.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eJonaitis EM, Janelidze S, Cody KA, Langhough R, Du L, Chin NA, et al. Plasma phosphorylated tau 217 in preclinical Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease. Brain Commun. 2023;5(2):fcad057, doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcad057. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013174.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTherriault J, Servaes S, Tissot C, Rahmouni N, Ashton NJ, Benedet AL, et al. Equivalence of plasma p-tau217 with cerebrospinal fluid in the diagnosis of Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19(11):4967-77, doi:10.1002/alz.13026. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37078495.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAshton NJ, Brum WS, Di Molfetta G, Benedet AL, Arslan B, Jonatis E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the plasma ALZpath pTau217 immunoassay to identify Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease pathology. medRxiv. 2023, doi:10.1101/2023.07.11.23292493. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502842.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePetersen RC, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Donohue MC, Gamst AC, Harvey DJ, et al. Alzheimer\u0026apos;s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): clinical characterization. Neurology. 2010;74(3):201-9, doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181cb3e25. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20042704.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eXie Y, Yang Q, Liu C, Zhang Q, Jiang J, Han Y, et al. Exploring the Pattern Associated With Longitudinal Changes of beta-Amyloid Deposition During Cognitively Normal Healthy Aging. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:617173, doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.617173. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33585514.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMorris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43(11):2412-4, doi:10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8232972.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1982;140:566-72, doi:10.1192/bjp.140.6.566. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7104545.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRc M. The Alzheimer\u0026apos;s Disease Assessment Scale; An instrument for assessing treatment efficacy. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1983;19:448-50.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL. A new rating scale for Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1984;141(11):1356-64, doi:10.1176/ajp.141.11.1356. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6496779.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWeber CJ, Carrillo MC, Jagust W, Jack CR, Jr., Shaw LM, Trojanowski JQ, et al. The Worldwide Alzheimer\u0026apos;s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: ADNI-3 updates and global perspectives. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021;7(1):e12226, doi:10.1002/trc2.12226. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35005206.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePalmqvist S, Insel PS, Stomrud E, Janelidze S, Zetterberg H, Brix B, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarker trajectories with increasing amyloid deposition in Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease. EMBO Mol Med. 2019;11(12):e11170, doi:10.15252/emmm.201911170. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31709776.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eVlassenko AG, McCue L, Jasielec MS, Su Y, Gordon BA, Xiong C, et al. Imaging and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in early preclinical alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2016;80(3):379-87, doi:10.1002/ana.24719. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27398953.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePalmqvist S, Mattsson N, Hansson O, Alzheimer\u0026apos;s Disease Neuroimaging I. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis detects cerebral amyloid-beta accumulation earlier than positron emission tomography. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 4):1226-36, doi:10.1093/brain/aww015. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26936941.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eNasiri H, Azaraein MH, Shakeri S, Sadeghi M, Sohrabi-Ashlaghi A, Berenjian S, et al. The polygenic hazard score mediates the association between plasma neurofilament light chain and brain morphometry in dementia spectrum. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2025;130:105703, doi:10.1016/j.archger.2024.105703. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39631103.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHansson O, Lehmann S, Otto M, Zetterberg H, Lewczuk P. Advantages and disadvantages of the use of the CSF Amyloid beta (Abeta) 42/40 ratio in the diagnosis of Alzheimer\u0026apos;s Disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019;11(1):34, doi:10.1186/s13195-019-0485-0. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31010420.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSkillback T, Farahmand BY, Rosen C, Mattsson N, Nagga K, Kilander L, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid tau and amyloid-beta1-42 in patients with dementia. Brain. 2015;138(Pt 9):2716-31, doi:10.1093/brain/awv181. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26133663.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBarthelemy NR, Li Y, Joseph-Mathurin N, Gordon BA, Hassenstab J, Benzinger TLS, et al. A soluble phosphorylated tau signature links tau, amyloid and the evolution of stages of dominantly inherited Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease. Nat Med. 2020;26(3):398-407, doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0781-z. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32161412.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLai R, Li B, Bishnoi R. P-tau217 as a Reliable Blood-Based Marker of Alzheimer\u0026apos;s Disease. Biomedicines. 2024;12(8), doi:10.3390/biomedicines12081836. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39200300.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMattsson-Carlgren N, Salvado G, Ashton NJ, Tideman P, Stomrud E, Zetterberg H, et al. Prediction of Longitudinal Cognitive Decline in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease Using Plasma Biomarkers. JAMA Neurol. 2023;80(4):360-9, doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.5272. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745413.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMielke MM, Dage JL, Frank RD, Algeciras-Schimnich A, Knopman DS, Lowe VJ, et al. Performance of plasma phosphorylated tau 181 and 217 in the community. Nat Med. 2022;28(7):1398-405, doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01822-2. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35618838.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSchoonenboom NS, Reesink FE, Verwey NA, Kester MI, Teunissen CE, van de Ven PM, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid markers for differential dementia diagnosis in a large memory clinic cohort. Neurology. 2012;78(1):47-54, doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823ed0f0. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22170879.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBrum WS, Cullen NC, Janelidze S, Ashton NJ, Zimmer ER, Therriault J, et al. A two-step workflow based on plasma p-tau217 to screen for amyloid beta positivity with further confirmatory testing only in uncertain cases. Nat Aging. 2023;3(9):1079-90, doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00471-5. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653254.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eStruyfs H, Niemantsverdriet E, Goossens J, Fransen E, Martin JJ, De Deyn PP, et al. Cerebrospinal Fluid P-Tau181P: Biomarker for Improved Differential Dementia Diagnosis. Front Neurol. 2015;6:138, doi:10.3389/fneur.2015.00138. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26136723.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eEwers M, Mattsson N, Minthon L, Molinuevo JL, Antonell A, Popp J, et al. CSF biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease: A large-scale international multicenter study. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(11):1306-15, doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.12.006. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25804998.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGroot C, Cicognola C, Bali D, Triana-Baltzer G, Dage JL, Pontecorvo MJ, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic performance to detect Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease and clinical progression of a novel assay for plasma p-tau217. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022;14(1):67, doi:10.1186/s13195-022-01005-8. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35568889.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eJanelidze S, Bali D, Ashton NJ, Barthelemy NR, Vanbrabant J, Stoops E, et al. Head-to-head comparison of 10 plasma phospho-tau assays in prodromal Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease. Brain. 2023;146(4):1592-601, doi:10.1093/brain/awac333. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36087307.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eChen L, Niu X, Wang Y, Lv S, Zhou X, Yang Z, et al. Plasma tau proteins for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:942629, doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.942629. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959295.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eQu Y, Ma YH, Huang YY, Ou YN, Shen XN, Chen SD, et al. Blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;128:479-86, doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.07.007. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34245759.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMattsson-Carlgren N, Janelidze S, Palmqvist S, Cullen N, Svenningsson AL, Strandberg O, et al. Longitudinal plasma p-tau217 is increased in early stages of Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease. Brain. 2020;143(11):3234-41, doi:10.1093/brain/awaa286. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33068398.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Alzheimer’s Disease, Positron emission tomography, Phosphorylated-tau; Plasma biomarker, β-amyloid, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, cognitive impairment","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7327653/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7327653/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eINTRODUCTION: This study explores the diagnostic accuracy of different biomarkers for Alzheimer\u0026rsquo;s disease (AD) using data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMETHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed on individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Key biomarkers assessed included plasma p-tau217, CSF p-tau181, CSF Aβ42, and amyloid PET imaging, alongside clinical assessments using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRESULTS: Plasma p-tau217 showed the strongest correlation with amyloid-β deposition and clinical scores (Adjusted R\u0026sup2; = 0.53 for ADAS, 0.51 for CDR), outperforming CSF Aβ42 and CSF p-tau181.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDISCUSSION: These results suggest that plasma p-tau217 may serve as a more accurate, cost-effective, and non-invasive alternative to CSF biomarkers and PET imaging. Its superior predictive power highlights its potential in routine clinical settings for early diagnosis and monitoring of AD progression, addressing key challenges in accessibility and patient compliance associated with current diagnostic methods.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Comparing the predictive value of plasma p-tau217 and CSF biomarkers (p-tau181, Aβ42) using amyloid positron emission tomography in Alzheimer's continuum","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-09-26 11:45:25","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7327653/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"81728f59-4bf6-4340-b09e-2542858ea896","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 26th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":55136971,"name":"Health sciences/Biomarkers"},{"id":55136972,"name":"Health sciences/Neurology"},{"id":55136973,"name":"Biological sciences/Neuroscience"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-10-15T07:54:08+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-09-26 11:45:25","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7327653","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7327653","identity":"rs-7327653","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00