Une complication tardive méconnue de la césarienne : le nodule endométriosique pariétal : à partir d'une série de cas à la Polyclinique de Navarre de Pau et au CHU de Bordeaux, proposition d'une démarche diagnostique et thérapeutique appropriée pour sensibiliser les médecins généralistes

In: Médecine humaine et pathologie. 2017 · 2017 · W2780559805
article OA: green CC0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex
AI-generated deep summary by gpt-5.6-luna, 2026-08-11 · read from full text

The paper addresses abdominal wall endometriotic nodules occurring as a late complication of cesarean delivery, based on a case series from the Polyclinique de Navarre in Pau and Bordeaux University Hospital. It proposes a diagnostic and therapeutic approach intended to improve recognition of this condition by general practitioners, but the available text contains only an anti-scraping notice and does not provide the cases, methods, outcomes, or stated limitations. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically cesarean-scar or abdominal-wall endometriosis and its diagnosis and treatment.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objective: describe clinical manifestations of abdominal wall endometrioma of cesarean scar, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and evaluate the duration of misdiagnosis. Materials and Methods: after a retrospective review of two institutions' databases, a total of 18 cases were analyzed from medical information collected in an Excel file. Result: patients are women of childbearing age and they had at least one cesarean section. The mean latent period was 37 months. Patients suffered from chronic pelvic (94%) cyclic (88%) and focused (76%) pain with a pelvic mass (61%). One patient out of three visits a general practitioner in first intention. Physical examination revealed a palpable mass in 94% of cases. Diagnosis firstly evocated by general practitioners don't included abdominal wall endometrioma in cesarean scar. 61% of patients had an ultrasonography, 17% associated with an MRI and 6% had only a MRI. Three diagnosis are still evocated before surgery: muscular mass syndrome, granuloma and endometrioma. Three patients had a medical treatment without success. Every patients had an elective wide excision of the nodule by a gynecologist (76%), an abdominal surgeon (18%) or a general surgeon (6%). Diagnosis is confirmed and no complications noticed for 88% of cases. One recurrence was observed. All patients completely recovered without relapse of symptoms. We have a mean follow‐up period of 75 months. The mean period between the beginning of the symptoms and the surgical procedure was 5.35 years with a maximum of 21 years. Conclusion: when we see a woman of childbearing age who had a cesarean section and suffers from chronic pelvic cyclic pain in general practice: it's necessary to search a parietal mass in order to eliminate the diagnostic of endometrioma of the cesarean scar.
Full text 1,068 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Making sure you're not a bot! Loading... You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone. Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive. Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate. Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometrioma

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK