Features affecting Cas9-Induced Editing Efficiency and Patterns in Tomato: Evidence from a Large CRISPR Dataset

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,666 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract CRISPR/Cas9 is a cornerstone of genome editing, yet the determinants of editing efficiency and DNA Double Strand Break (DSB) repair outcomes remain poorly understood, particularly in plants. To address this gap, we generated a dataset of 420 sgRNAs targeting promoters, exons, and introns of 137 genes in tomato protoplasts and quantified editing efficiencies together with ATAC-seq–derived chromatin accessibility and transcriptional states in the same cellular system. Editing efficiency was consistently higher at open chromatin sites and modestly elevated in promoters and introns relative to exons, whereas transcriptional activity did not measurably influence editing outcomes. Additionally, we identified a local genomic effect resulting in less variable editing between sgRNAs targeting the same compared to different genes. A distinct subset of sgRNAs achieved nearly complete editing, producing long deletions with extended microhomology tracts. These repair footprints closely parallel those observed for high-efficiency guides in human datasets, implicating conserved sequence-driven biases and a predominant role for microhomology-mediated end joining at these sites. Yet, widely used human-trained prediction models failed to rank sgRNA performance in plants, underscoring the limits of cross-species generalization. This dataset defines how chromatin accessibility, genomic context, and intrinsic sequence characteristics shape Cas9 activity in plants, and provides a resource for improving guide design and advancing mechanistic understanding of plant DNA repair. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00