Mechanical comparison of Escherichia coli biofilms with altered matrix composition: a study combining shear-rheology and microindentation

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,948 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The mechanical properties of bacterial biofilms depend on the composition and micro-structure of their extracellular matrix (ECM), which constitutes a network of extracellular proteins and polysaccharide fibers. In particular, E. coli macrocolony biofilms were suggested to present tissue-like elasticity due to a dense fiber network consisting of amyloid curli and phosphoethanolamine-modified cellulose (pEtN-cellulose). To understand the contribution of these two main ECM components to the emergent mechanical properties of E. coli biofilms, we performed shear-rheology and microindentation experiments on biofilms grown from E. coli strains that produce different ECM. We measured that biofilms containing curli fibers are stiffer in compression than curli-deficient biofilms. We further quantitatively demonstrate the crucial contribution of pEtN-cellulose, and especially of the pEtN modification, to the stiffness and structural stability of biofilms when associated with curli fibers. To compare the differences observed between the two methods, we also investigated how the structure and mechanical properties of biofilms with different ECM compositions are affected by the sample preparation method used for shear-rheology. We found that biofilm homogenization, used prior to shear-rheology, destroys the macroscale structure of the biofilm while the microscopic ECM architecture may remain intact. The resulting changes in biofilm mechanical properties highlight the respective advantages and limitations of the two complementary mechanical characterization techniques in the context of biofilm research. As such, our work does not only describe the role of the ECM on the mechanical properties of E. coli biofilms. It also informs the biofilm community on considering sample preparation when interpreting mechanical data of biofilm-based materials. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00