[Clinical comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total laparoscopy hysterectomy (TLH) in women with benign disease of uterus--a prospective randomized study].
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This randomized study found that laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) was associated with shorter procedure times and less blood loss than total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for benign uterine disease.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare two techniques of hysterectomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised study. SETTING: Institute for the Mother and Child Care, Prague. METHODS: 85 patients randomized into two groups--laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). The criteria studied were length of the procedure, blood loss, complication rate, uterus weight, rate of conversions, consumption of analgesics, inflammatory response. RESULTS: Mean length of the procedure for LAVH, TLH was 85 and 111 min, respectivelly, the mean blood loss 306 and 184 ml. There was no difference in inflammatory response and use of antibiotics. Consumption of analgesics was higher in the TLH group. Conversions to laparotomy occurred only in the LAVH group. Only in the TLH group we noticed serious postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: LAVH seems to be the preferable technique of hysterectomy for benign diseases of the uterus.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-10T10:46:52.524674+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK